Upload
behavioral-gerontology
View
217
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
An aging presentation at the 37th Annual Association for Behavior Analysis International Conference in Denver, CO .
Citation preview
Amanda Ripley, MS BCBAImagine! Behavioral Health Services
Paula K. Davis, Ph.D.Southern Illinois University
2008: 38.7 million adults 65 and older
By 2050: 88.5 million adults 65 and older
By 2030: 1 in 5 Americans will be 80 and older
AD: cognitive disturbance and decline of memory
Current: 71 seconds
By 2050: 33 seconds
Make up 47% of residents of nursing home
ActivitiesChoice and Variety (Logsdon, 2000)Purposeful Activities (Basler, 2005)Ethical Obligations (Skinner, 1969)
Preference AssessmentsType (MSWO, paired-choice)Format (tangible, pictorial)Physical (reach, vision)
Compared Tangible and Pictorial Formats
Results: 5/7 did not show consistent preferences across the two formats
Conclusion: preference assessments are affected by presentation format
Compared choice formats to engagementPictorial, Tangible, Verbal, Textual
Results: tangible and verbal were predictive of engagement
Conclusion: implications for clinicians who need assessment that are quick and yield predictive results
Evaluate the consistency of preferences across presentation formatsEvaluate preferences between productive and leisure activities
3 Females76 to 88 years oldMMSE:11 to 20ADL dependentAll participants made a choice between pairs
12 activities were chosen from a list provided (Burket, 2008)
6 Leisure Activities6 Productive Activities
4 Preference Assessments were conducted:Informal (Questionnaire)
Tangible Paired-Choice
Verbal Paired-Choice
Single Stimulus Engagement
Each activity was asked 1 timeResponse Measurement:
Preferred: confirming statement (yes, sure)Not Preferred: declining statement (no, nope)
Verbal: Question onlyTangible: Question and Item Presented
1 minute contingent access to activityResponse Measurement:
Verbal: Participant said name of itemTangible: Participant said name of, approached, or touched item
Scheduled Breaks (every 20 minutes)
[activity] for up to 30 minutes while I do some
30 minute accessResponse Measurement:
Engaged: actively manipulating the item and/or looking at the materials without sleeping (i.e., shutting eyes for more than one second)
10s Whole Interval Recording
Taken 33% of SessionsTreatment Integrity: 100% for all sessionsInterobserver Agreement
Informal: 100%Verbal: 98% - 100% Tangible: 97% - 100%SSE: 98%-99%
Informal and systematic assessment not comparableSignificant correlation / similar hierarchies between tangible and verbal
No significant correlation for SSE and other assessments
Highest Engagement: first 10 minute blockPreferred both Leisure and Productive Activities
Choice and Variety are important
Length of Activities
Stimulus Control issues
Activities based upon previous life rolesEvaluate individualized activities vs. generic activities?
Attrition RatesWill other different types / formats avoid attrition rates?