Response to Opposition

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Response to Opposition

    1/5

    BeforetheFEDERALCOMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION

    Washington,D.C.

    IntheMatterof )

    )

    ApplicationforRenewalof ) FileNumber:

    BroadcastStationLicenseof ) BRH20140130AGC

    )

    EmmisLicenseCorporationofNewYork )

    EmmisCommunications )

    )

    ForRenewal

    of

    Station

    License

    WQHT,

    )NewYork,NewYork )

    OnMay31,2014,IreceivedacopyofEmmisLicenseCorporationofNewYorksOPPOSITION

    TOPETITION

    TO

    DENY.

    This

    opposition

    fails

    to

    address

    key

    issues

    introduced

    in

    the

    original

    petitiontodeny,andinstead,seekstoredirectthecruxoftheoriginalobjectionintotheareaof

    contentasopposedtokeepingtheintendedfocusoncommunity.

    Assuch,IaskthattheCommissionconsiderthefollowing:

    Hiphop,asdemonstratedbyexamplesintheoriginalpetition,iswidelyrecognizedasa

    cultureandacommunitythatsubscribestothatculture.

    Hiphopcultureandcommunityarewidelyrecognizedasconsistingofseveralsubcultures,or

    elements,includingBboy/BGirl/danceculture,graffiti/artculture,rapmusicculture,DJ

  • 8/12/2019 Response to Opposition

    2/5

    cultureandaspecializedknowledge/understanding/perspectivethatcomesfromyearsofliving

    andparticipatinginalifestylewiththoseinfluencerseverpresent.

    ItisaratheruniquephenomenonofAmericana,anddeservestobetreatedassuch.

    Asstatedintheoriginalpetition,whileIcertainlyhaveobjectionsthatrelatetothecontentand

    programmingatWQHTHot97,itisnotthecruxoftheargument.

    Bystating,falsely,thathiscomplaintsrelatesolelytomattersthatarepursuanttotheFirst

    Amendment,theCommunicationsActandsettledprecedent,committedtoEmmiseditorial

    discretionand

    therefore

    outside

    of

    the

    Commissions

    proper

    inquiry

    in

    evaluation

    WQHTs

    licenserenewal,theapplicantattemptstomisleadthisCommissionintobelievingthatmy

    objectionrevolvesaroundmypersonalprogrammingpreferencesnotbeingmet.

    Thisisnotthecase.

    Emmisrecognizestheexactissuebysummarizingmysingularobjection:(1)doesnot

    provideadequateprogrammingdirectedatthehiphopculture,(2)focusesdisproportionately

    onhiphopmusicascomparedtotherelatedculture.

    Intheirentireresponse,theydonotrefutetheseclaims,norprovideanyadditionalinformation

    whichwoulddemonstrateotherwise.

    Thereremainsnorepresentationof,orattentiontotheBboy/Bgirl/danceaspectofhiphop

    cultureandcommunity.

    Thereremainsnorepresentationof,orattentiontotheartistic/visual/graffitiaspectsofhiphop

    cultureandcommunity.

  • 8/12/2019 Response to Opposition

    3/5

    Thereremainsnorepresentationof,orattentiontothesignificantDJaspectofhiphopculture

    andcommunity,otherthanthenarrowspectrumofradioandclubDJs.

    Thereremainsnexttonorepresentationof,orattentiontoanyissuesspecifictohiphop

    cultureandcommunityatlarge.

    Thereremainsextremelylimitedunderrepresentationof,orattentiontorapmusicoutsideofa

    verynarrowsliceoftheoverallspectrum.

    Thereremainsextremelylimitedunderrepresentationof,orattentionto,thelocalhiphop

    musicand

    cultural

    community

    within

    the

    broadcast

    radius

    of

    the

    station.

    Whileprogrammingchangescouldcertainlyensurethisbalanceismet,contentchoices,again,

    arenotthecruxoftheobjection.

    Toclarifyonceagain.

    Themostbasictenetofanapplicantmustfollowistoservethepublicinterest.

    Indeed,intheFCCsPublicandBroadcastingguide,andinthedecisionscitedinthe

    applicantsopposition,itisclearthatalicenseegenerallyhasdiscretiontoselectwhatits

    stationbroadcastsandtootherwisedeterminehowitcanbestserveitscommunityoflicense.

    However,byattemptingtoredirectthecontextoftheobjectionssetforthinmyoriginal

    petitionas

    matters

    of

    content,

    the

    applicant

    is

    attempting

    to

    obfuscate

    the

    fact

    that

    they

    are

    in

    actualityattemptingtodefinetheirowncommunityoflicense.

    Byprovidingnoassurancesorexamplesthattheentiretyofhiphopswiderculturalcommunity

    isbeingserved,andinfact,hidingbehindtheirassertionthattheydontreallyhaveto,the

  • 8/12/2019 Response to Opposition

    4/5

    applicantcontinuestodemonstrateanegregiousviolationoftheveryfirstobligationofa

    licensee.

    Asevidencedbytheirowncitation:

    Licenseeshavebroaddiscretionbasedontheirrighttofreespeechtochoose,ingoodfaith,theprogrammingtheybelieveservestheneedsandinterestsoftheircommunities.BystatingthattheyareWhereHipHopLives,WQHTHot97isclearlydefiningtheirintended

    audience,clearlyclaimingwhichcommunitytheyarepurportingtoserve.Yet,theextreme

    lackof

    attention

    to

    wide

    swaths

    of

    that

    community,

    and

    therefore

    an

    enormous

    amount

    of

    its

    needsandinterests,demonstratesotherwise.

    Assuch,theyshouldnotingoodfaithbeallowedtocontinuetobroadcastwhile

    demonstratingsuchdiscriminatorybehavior.

    IftheFCCistoleaveprogrammingdiscretiontothelicensees,thenoneoftheonlyprotections

    citizenshaveagainstlicenseesabusingthepowerofthepublictrustisthattheymustserve

    thepublicinterestoftheircommunity.

    Butifthestations,andthecorporationswhorunthem,areallowedtodefinetheirown

    communities,asEmmisisattemptingtodointhiscasedespitewidelyaccepted,culturally

    acceptedstandards,thentheFCCwouldbeconcedinganenormousamountofcontrolintothe

    handsoftheentitiestheyarechargedwithregulating,erodingthatpublictrust,settinga

    potentialprecedentwhichcouldbeextremelydamagingtothepublic.

  • 8/12/2019 Response to Opposition

    5/5

    Asanindividualwhoisapartoftheactualhiphopcommunity,Ispeakformyselfandmany

    otherswhenIstatethatIshouldnothavethewideexpansivenessofmyculturalaffiliation

    stifledbyanentityofthepublictrust.Ishouldnothaveaspectsofmycultureandlifestyle

    ignoredbyanentitythatcapitalizesoffofafraudulentattachmenttomyculture.WithWQHT

    Hot97holdingsuchapowerfulvoiceinourarea,theiractionspresentanimminentand

    ongoingmenacetohiphopcultureandcommunityasawhole,myselfincluded.Theiractions

    aredamaginganddiscriminatory,anddiscountawellestablishedsegmentofthepopulationof

    NewYorkCityanditssurroundingareas,myselfincluded.

    Assuch,grantingofthechallengedapplicationwouldcontinuetocausedirectinjurytomyself

    andothers,injurywhichcanbedirectlytracedtothechallengedaction,injurywhichwouldbe

    preventedorredressedbythereliefrequested.

    ItisforthesereasonsthatIbelieveIhaveindeedestablishedaprimafaciecasethatthe

    renewalofWQHTslicensewouldbeinconsistentwithSection309(k),andattheveryleast,

    presentedenoughsubstantialandmaterialquestionoffacttowarrantahearing.

    BasedontheoriginalPETITIONTODENYandtheadditionalstatementsinthisresponse,Iagain

    requestthattheCommissiondenytheapplicantsrenewaltobroadcast.

    Respectfullysubmitted,

    By___________________________________