96
Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Renewable Resource Economics

Peter BerckGöteborg, 2014

Page 2: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Outline

1. Open Access Intro. 2. ODE’s in the plane and the Schaefer model. 3. Optimal Renewable Resource Models. 4. Extinction. 5. Poaching.6. LP and Dual: A graphical tour. 7. The Forest Model8. Forest Policy. 9. Forest and Climate.

Page 3: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

OPEN ACCESS

Page 4: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Examples

Examples• Grazing• Pollution• Carbon Sink• Aquifers• Forest Charcoal• Fishing/poaching

Ideas• Anyone can come and take

the resource== open access• Zero price for the resource• Externality• Common Property and

cooperation, rules.• Coase, create a market.

Page 5: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Grazing

• Garret Hardin. Tragedy of the Commons.

Page 6: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Hardin

Page 7: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Common Property

• Hardin describes common property, the number of herdsman, E, is constant.

• The exploitation per herdsman, h, is variable.• They do not pay anything to increase h.

Page 8: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Common Property or Externality

• We often think of pollution as an externality. We do some worthwhile thing, h, and a side effect is that we get some pollution P(h).

• We can tell the same story as common property. Fixed number of people do good thing, h, which uses clean air services in amount P as an input. The input should be priced or restricted but it isn’t. Hence too much of P is used.

Page 9: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Pollution: Air as common property resource or an externality

• Max utility from economic activity, h, less costs of activity d* h, (private)

• Economic activity – emits pollution, P, (externality)– or uses up P units of air. (common property)

• P causes damage, D. • Max U(h)- d h private typical agent, one of E

such.• Max U(h) – d h – D(h E) public

Page 10: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

E and 1

• There are E people of which you are one.• Your damage is D /E.• Total damage summed across people is D .• So private is U(h) –dh-D(h E)/E• And as E gets large• The private objective is U(h) –dh.

Page 11: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Common Property and Open Access

• With E fixed and h variable we talk of this as a as common property. E people either overuse the resource or they cooperate.

• With E variable (whether or not h is variable) we talk of it as open access. This is less manageable as a new person can come in and do as they please. Even if the original people have good agreements on how to manage the resource.

Page 12: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Market solution

• Public FOCU’-d-D’=0

• Private FOCU’-d=0

• Make Private into public by charging D’ for access to clean air (aka garbage collection services). Coase type solution.

Page 13: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Pollution Example: Open Access

• Cigarette butt disposal in Gothenburg.– Costs me nothing to throw on ground. Costs two

steps to put it in the trash. Hence I enter the ciggie throwery.

– Doesn’t make big difference given all the other butts.

– When you add it up over all the individual rational people who do this you get

– GUNK*, a stinky, ugly mess that everyone including the smokers puts up with.

Page 14: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Carbon

• Carbon in the atmosphere is a stock pollutant. Or anyone can use the atmosphere’s CO2 removal services for free.– Y is gdp without carbon use– d is the gdp cost of using carbon (mining)– Social problem is

0

max ( ( )) ( ( )) rtE U E t Y dE D P t e dt

P E P

Page 15: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Hamiltonian with costate

• The social optimum is found from the maximum principle and the costate equation. The costate variable is the social value of atmospheric removal services.

• Open access is when the costate variable is set to zero. Now we operate as if atmospheric services were free.

( ( )) ( ( ))H U E t Y dE D P t E P

Page 16: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Water Pumping

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=3rSnf-u0bzc

• This is a real and very serious problem the world over. Pumping drives down the water table.

Page 17: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Water Model

• E is extraction which produces value U• P is depth• D(P) is the unit cost of pumping.• R is rainfall.

Page 18: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Water Over time, social problem

0

max ( ( )) ( ( )) rtE U E t E D P t e dt

P R E

Page 19: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

With open access to groundwater

• E(t) is given by U’(E)-D= 0.• Which drives up P, which drives up D until• U-D E = 0.• And thereafter E = R.• Show that this is not the optimal thing to do.

Page 20: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Forest

• Log stealing.• Charcoal making.• Open access means anyone can come and take.• Elinor Ostrom looked for solutions where only a

small group, perhaps a village, could come and take and the village would evolve rules. This is common property, E is limited. And if they cooperate, h, too will be limited.

Page 21: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Fish and Poaching

• x stock of fish• E number of boats (or hunters), effort.• p price, c cost per boat.• k catchability constant.• Catch h = kEx (special assumption to make it

easy, called a Schaeffer fishery. p. 68 C&C)

Page 22: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Entry rule.

• pkEx – cE is instantaneous profit• dE/dt is proportional to instantaneous profit

Page 23: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Stock rule

• dx/dt = f(x) - kEx

Page 24: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

What’s wrong?

• The entrant makes money but drives down the fish stock, which drives down everyone else's catch.

Page 25: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Fishery game

• Any “fish” you catch in the first minute are yours.

• Any “fish” you catch in the second minute are yours plus you are awarded two extra fish. As those are the baby fish that grew from the original fish in the first minute.

• Side payments, force majeure, coalitions, etc are perfectly acceptable.

Page 26: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

3 Take Aways

• Open access means the resource is unpriced. Take what you want for free. Pricing solves this.

• Open Access vs. Common Property– Limitation in user numbers opens the door for

cooperation.• Open access means that the user imposes a

negative externality on other users.– Takes stuff that should grow and now doesn’t grow– Leaves stuff that hurts everyone.

Page 27: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

ODEOrdinary Linear Differential Equations on the plane

Page 28: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Topics

• Two Equation System• Eigen values and vectors• General solution• Specific solution• Approximating a nonlinear

system• Phase plane• Nodes

Page 29: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Linear Ordinary Differential Equations (Linear ODE)

• Linear in x, derivative only w.r.t. one variable• We are looking for an x(t) that obeys the equation.

is a matrix, n x n

is a column n vector

the 'dot' means time derivative.

0 is an initial condition.

x Ax

A

x

x( ) = x*

Page 30: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Unproved theorems

• 1. Existence. There is a solution to a Linear ODE.*

• 2. Uniqueness. Through a point, x’, there is only one solution to a LODE

Page 31: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Eigen values and vectors.

• We restrict ourselves to considering only matrices A that have n distinct eigenvectors.

• There are n linearly independent vectors c and n constants λ s.t.

Ac c

Page 32: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

A solution

• ci and λi are an eigen vector value pair.• TRY IT. Show it is a solution.

( ) e iti it x c

Page 33: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

General Solution

1 1

( ) e i

n nt

i i i ii i

t b b

x x c

The b’s are n constants in the complex plane. Show this is still a solution!

Page 34: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Specific Solution

• Limit ourselves to an initial condition. • At t = 0, exp(λt) = 1.

1

1

1

1

*

define as the matrix ...

and ... ' a column vector

* and *

n

i ii

n

n

b

c c

b b

x

x c

C

b

x Cb b C

Page 35: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Complex λ• Euler’s theorem

cos( ) sin( )i te t i t

Suggests looking for solutions in terms of sin an cos if the solution is restricted to the real plane.

Page 36: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Indeed…

• One can show that the eigenvectors are a complex conjugate pair, call the real part w and the imaginary part v. These are both vectors. C= w+vi. Im is the imaginary part and re is the real part of λ. The two solutions restricted to the real plane are…

( )1

( )2

x (t) = e cos(im( ) ) sin(im( ) )

x (t) = e sin(im( ) ) cos(im( ) )

re t

re t

t t

t t

w v

w v

Page 37: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

The general solution

• Is just a linear combination of x1 and x2. That is where the parameters come from that one matches to the initial conditions.

• Notice also that the inside formula is periodic. Every t = 2 pi / im(λ) we are back where we started.

Page 38: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Equilibrium.

• Enlarge the model a little bit so the equilibrium is off of zero…

10 iff x= A

x Ax p

x p

Of course this still works if p=0. Now we have x* the equilibrium

Page 39: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

A non linear model

( ) with equilibrium 0 ( *)

is an n-vector.

x f x f x

x

Page 40: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Approximating a differential equation

( ) ( *) '( *) *

'( *)

( *)Note that: so..

( *)'( *) *

x f x f x f x x x

xf x

xd x x

xdt

d x xf x x x

dt

We use Taylors theorem to find the values of f(x)near the equilibrium

Page 41: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

THE SCHAEFER FISHERYIn which we introduce the phase space

Page 42: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Catch

• h = k E x– h is harvest– E is trips– x is biomass– k is a constant

• Empirical formula that relates catch to trips and biomass

• Could generalize with a power of x

Page 43: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Biology

• Stock next period =– Stock this period – Plus net growth (f(x) )

• Growth• Recruitment• Less natural mortality

– Less catch– dx/dt = f(x) - h

Page 44: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Stock …

f(x)growth

x stock

MSY

f(x)=gx(1-x/K)

Page 45: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Profits

• The profits from a boat are– Price times Catch – Cost– p k x – c

• When profits are positive, boats enter• When negative, they leave• So, in equilibrium profits are zero

Page 46: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

2 Equation Model

( )

E pkx c

x f x kEx

Page 47: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Steady State

• When the stock does not change over time the fishery is said to have reached steady state.

• We will investigate steady states.

Page 48: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

When Stock Doesn’t Change

• The catch must be exactly the net growth.f(x) = k E x

Page 49: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Steady state E(x)

• gx(1-x/K) = kEx• E = (g/k)(1-x/K)

Page 50: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

How Can Profit Be Zero?

• The catch per trip depends upon the biomass of fishh / E = k x

• Lower biomass means less catch• Profit = Zero

p k x – c = 0xopen = c/(pk)

Page 51: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Equilibrium in the E-x Plane

c/(pk) x

E

E = (g/k)(1-x/K)

Page 52: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Finding Eopen

• E = (g/k)(1-x/K)• Eopen = (g/k)(1-c/(pkK) )

Page 53: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Recap…

• Since fishers will enter the fishery until profits are driven to zero,

• It must be the the steady state biomass of fish is such that the catch from a fishing trip just pays the costs of the trip.

Page 54: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Catch and Cost: Steady State

F(x)growthand catch

x stockc/(pk)

As Cost goes up the Catch rises and then falls

Page 55: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Adjustment-the Phase Space

• The fishery is described by E and X• Draw locus of E,X where E doesn’t change• Draw locus of E,X where X doesn’t change• Intersection is equilibrium• Find direction of motion at all other places.

Page 56: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Phase Space

• dx/dt = f(x) – kEx= 0– Is equation for one isocline– We assume f is gx(1-x/K) E = f/(xk) is linear and downward sloping

• dE/dt = pkx – c=0Is equation for other isoclineIt is vertical line at x = c/pk

Page 57: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Direction of dE/dt

E

x

dx/dt=0

dE/dt=0 When x > c/(pk) thendE/dt = pkx – c > 0So arrow goes up

Page 58: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Direction of dx/dt

E

x

dx/dt=0

dE/dt=0 Start on dx/dt = f(x) – kxEMake E biggerNow dx/dt < 0So above dx/dt=0dx/dt < 0

Page 59: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Spiral or direct approach?

The convergent.

E

x

dx/dt=0

dE/dt=0

Page 60: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Approx of dx/dt

• Find linear approx of system

(1 2 * / )

evaluated at x*= c/(pk) and

( *) ( / )(1 * / )

* / /( )

xg x K kE

x

E x g k x K

xgx K gc pkK

x

(1 / )x gx x K kxE

Page 61: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Approx of dx/dt wrt E

/ ( )x

kx kc pkE

(1 / )x gx x K kxE

Note that we evaluate at the equilibrium

Page 62: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Approx of dE/dt

0

Epk

x

E

E

E pkx c

Page 63: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Linear Approx to ODE

0 0

0 0

/ /

0

x x x xgc pkK c p

E E E Epk

Page 64: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Eigenvalues

2/ / 4gc pkK gc pkK kc

Two cases: real and negativeComplex conjugate pair with negative real part.

Page 65: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Lets look at te

Case 1: l is negative and real. Then exp(lt) goes toZero as t goes to infinity

Case 2: l is complex conjugate pair with negative real partRecall (from 11th grade trig.) exp (it) = cos(t)+ i sin(t)re is the real part and imag is the imaginary part

( ) ( )

( ) cos ( ) sin ( )

t re t imag it

re t

e e e

e imag t i imag t

Page 66: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Also goes to zero

( ) ( )

( ) cos ( ) sin ( )

t re t imag it

re t

e e e

e imag t i imag t

So long as re(lamda) is negative.The sin/cos part leads to a circle- so you get a circle with ever smaller radius, aka a spiral.

Page 67: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Theory of ODE’s in plane

• Find the eigenvalues of the linear approx, call them l1 and l2

• If they are real and negative then there is direct convergence to equilibrium

• If they are complex conjugate pair with negative real part, then there is a spiraling convergence to equilibrium

Page 68: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

North Sea Herring

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

0 200000 400000 600000 800000

Harvest metric tons

Sto

ck (

1000)

metr

ic t

ons

Source: Bjornal and Conrad

Page 69: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

North Sea Herring

1965

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 200000 400000 600000 800000

Catch (Metric Tons)

Num

ber

of Ves

sels

1969

1976

1963

Page 70: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Conclusion Open Access Fishery

• Schaeffer model• Stable• Can by cyclic• Not proved: has too few fish.

Page 71: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT OF RENEWABLE RESOURCES

The Hamiltonian and the exceptional control

Page 72: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Optimal management

• Suppose manager can control E directly and wishes to maximize PV of profits.

• How is this different from Open Access?

Page 73: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Word on Hamiltonians

Rules for current value Hamiltonian:

, , (whatever is under the integral sign less the )

+ (RHS of the differential equation)

1. Max

2. -r =-

3. lim 0

rt

h

rtt

H x h e

H

H

x

e x

Page 74: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Control

• We seek a function h(t) that tells us how much to harvest at any time.

• Functions h(t) that fulfill conditions 1-3 are candidates for an optimal control.

• In our case, the conditions are also sufficient, but we do not delve into that.

Page 75: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Toy problem

• We start with a toy problem in which costs are either zero or constant. The problem will show the role of interest rates.

• Clark’s theorem is that really high interest rates make the optimal and open access equilibrium the same. In our case, zero fish.

• Note that in developing countries interest rates of 20% are not uncommon! Even Americans with maxed out credit cards have those interest rates.

Page 76: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Simplest problem: necessary conditions

00

max s.t. ( ) and 0 .rth h

phe dt x f x h x

0

( , , ) ( ( ) )

'( )

max

lim 0

h h

rtt

H h x ph f x h

Hr f x

xH

e x

Page 77: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Linearity

• H is linear in h. So finding the right h by setting dH/dh = 0 will not work. Remember, we want to maximize H and that can happen at an extreme value of h.

• So we introduce extreme values. Zero is a natural lower bound for h and we choose h with an over bar as an upper bound.

Page 78: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Solution

• We will construct the optimal h in pieces. First we will find a special x=x*. It is special because if that is the stock then the optimal control is to keep the stock at that level, forever.

• Then we will see what to do if x > x* and x < x*.

• The h that goes along with x* is called the exceptional control.

Page 79: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Find the exceptional control

• From the max principle we see that H is linear in h, so either the control is “all the way on” or “all the way off” or dH/dh is zero and h can be anything. Lets look at that case.

Page 80: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Exceptional Control

• So long as• Any value of• h will produce a maximum of H.• Only interesting if this is true for more than an

instant so•

0H

ph

0 0d H

dt h

Page 81: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Put that together with costate

• So if x = x*, best policy is to keep it there, so h* = f(x*).

'( ) and 0

'( *)

r f x

r f x

Page 82: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Claim

• When x != x*, then• drive x to x* as quickly as possible, so x > x*,

h= all the way on.• x< x*, h = all the way off.

Page 83: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Sketch

• x > x*, means f’(x) < f’(x*)=r

• So λ grows.• A solution that meets requirements 1-3 is that λ starts below p, hence dH/dh > 0, so h is set to h upper bar, which causes x to fall, and eventually reach x* when λ = p.

'( ) '( )r f x r f x

Page 84: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Optional exercise

• Expand this sketch into a proof. Can you rule out that λ does not start above P? Do you see how λ(0) is determined?

Page 85: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Interior problem

20

0

max ( ) s.t. ( ) and 0 .rth h

ph h e dt x f x h x

Page 86: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Finding the best policy for Schaefer

0

max

. . / ( )

( , , ) ( ( ) )

rzE e E pkx c dz

s t dx dt f x kEx

H x E pkEx cE f x kEx

Page 87: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Present value Max principle

'

( )

Hr pkE f kE

x

x f x kEx

Hpkx c kx

E

Page 88: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Most Rapid Approach

• Notice that H is linear in E (the control variable).

• Therefore to max H w.r.t. to E either– E = infinite (ok, we choose an upper limit Eh)– E = zero– E = any and dH/dE = 0

Page 89: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

We search for the exceptional control

• Where0

Hpkx c kx

E

And stays zero. So 0

0

d H

dt E

pk x k x kx

Eq. I

Eq. II

Page 90: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

What does

tell us?

• Price of fish in market, less unit (and marginal) cost per fish caught, less shadow price of fish in the sea = 0.

• Or P = MC of catching plus MC of in situ resource

0

/ ( ) 0

Hpkx c kx

Ep c kx

Page 91: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

How to find the exceptional control and its stock.

• Need to solve 4 equations to get rid of everything but constants and x.

0 '

( )

0

0

r pkE f kE

x f x kEx

pkx c kx

pk x k x kx

Page 92: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Let’s find the exceptional value for x

• And compare it to xopen • That’s your part of your homework!• Part II of your homework is to run the matlab

code fish2.m– What happens as you increase step size?– Choose one other parameter and find its effect of

the simulation.

Page 93: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Exhaustible

Pure Theory and a Comparison

Page 94: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Pure Exhaustible

• Growth function is f(x) = 0, so dx/dt = -h.

00

max s.t. and 0 .rth h

phe dt x h x

Page 95: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

Solution to this problem

• Is again a bang, bang control. Let’s work it out.

Page 96: Renewable Resource Economics Peter Berck Göteborg, 2014

But we want h >0 for more than

• The first few minutes.• We can do that by making p(t) adjust so that

dH/dh = 0.

• More on this problem, later.