Upload
trinhkhanh
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Regeneración urbana y eficiencia energética: hacia nuevos modelos de gestión Urban regeneration and
energy efficiency: Towards new management models
XXI Semana Europea de Gestión Avanzada
30 octubre 2015 Paraninfo de la ETS Arquitectura
Donostia-San Sebastián
Patricia Molina Costa Technical Coordinator (Tecnalia)
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Call: H2020-EE-2014-3-Market Uptake Topic: Enhancing the capacity of public authorities to plan and implement sustainable energy policies and measures (EE-07-2014) Type: Coordination and Support Actions (CSA) Title: Fostering public capacity to plan, finance and manage integrated urban regeneration for sustainable energy uptake Budget: 1,4 million € Duration: 2 years Partners: Tecnalia (coord.) Spain Surbisa Spain VISESA Spain EVE Spain TNO The Netherlands Gemeente Utrecht The Netherlands SDEWES Croatia Grad Osijek Croatia APN Croatia ASM Poland
Concept and Approach:
• Higher complexity when moving from EE building retrofitting to neighbourhood/district scale
• Integrated approach as the main driver of European urban strategy
• Need to integrate other dimensions and measures, and to find synergies: social, economic, over public space, mobility, etc.
• Many policies, plans and subsidies geared towards EE renovation, but not integrated within urban planning regulations.
• Misalignment of policies, plans and subsidies from different levels of government
• Key drivers for implementing EE measures at neighborhood level: engaging stakeholders, managing and financing renovation plans.
Global Objective: To enhance public capacity to plan, finance and manage integrated urban regeneration for sustainable energy uptake.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
OBJECTIVES
Consortium structure
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Eurocities CEMR UDN Cov. of Mayors
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Workplan structure
PROJECT OVERVIEW
PROJECT OVERVIEW
WP 1 – Management T 1.1 – Administrative & Financial Co-ordination T 1.2 – Monitoring & Reporting. T 1.3 – Participation in Common H2020 Activities WP 2 – Framework Design T 2.1 – Review of existing policies, planning, management and financing mechanisms T 2.2 – Stakeholder Mapping WP 3 – Collaborative analysis and proposals T 3.1 – Preparation of Workshop series and process design T 3.2 – Workshops in the National Clusters T 3.3 – Integration of Results and lessons for future application
WP 4 – Capacity Building T 4.1 – Capacity Building Planning and Content Creation T 4.2 – Training Activities WP 5 – Dissemination and Networking T 5.1 – Dissemination & Communication Plan, overall communication activities T 5.2 –Website and Social Media connection T 5.3 – Project Newsletters T 5.4 – Network Building and strengthening T 5.5 – Final Project Conference
Expected Impacts 1. Influence in public officers
2. New and improved plans and policies
• Strategy for implementing EE measures in an urban regeneration plan in each of the partner cities
• National strategy for multilevel coordination
3. Final consumers impacted
4. Acceleration of the Energy Efficiency Directive implementation • Art. 4 dedicated section in national workshops • Capacity building on financial aspects, such as EE obligation schemes
and EE National funds
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Gantt chart
Start End 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
WP 1 – Management 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
T 1.1 – Administrative & Financial Co-ordination. 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
T 1.2 – Monitoring & Reporting. 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
T 1.3 – Participation in Common H2020 Activities. 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
WP 2 – Framework Design 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 2.1 – Review of existing policies, planning, management and financing 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 2.2 – Stakeholder Mapping. 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WP 3 – Collaborative analysis and proposals 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 3.1 – Preparation of Workshop series and process design 1 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 3.2 – Workshops in the National Clusters 4 10 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 3.3 – Integration of Results and lessons for future application 10 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WP 4 – Capacity Building 13 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
T 4.1 – Capacity Building Planning and Content Creation 13 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 4.2 – Training Activities 16 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
WP 5 – Dissemination and Networking 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
T 5.1 – Dissemination & Communication Plan, overall communication activities 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
T 5.2 – Project website and Social Media connection 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 5.3 – Project Newsletters 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
T 5.4 – Network Building and strengthening 13 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
T 5.5 – Final Project Conference 19 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
Reporting periods: 1-12, 13-24Deliverables
fosterREG
Workpackages and Tasks
Year 1 Year 2Month
Project Milestones
D2.1
D2.3D2.2
MS3
D3.1
D3.2, D3.3, D3.4
MS2
D5.3
D5.4
D1.1
D1.2 D1.3
D4.2
D4.3
D3.5
D5.5
D5.1
D4.1
D5.6
MS4
MS1
D5.2
PROJECT OVERVIEW
WP2: Framework Design
WP2: Framework Design Lead partner: Tecnalia Timeframe: June-September 2015 Objectives: • To set up the appropriate framework for collaborative work between different
levels in the public sector to be carried out in WP3, and prepare the needed materials
• To identify the most appropriate stakeholders to get engaged in the collaborative analysis process
• To provide WP3 with initial analysis and perspective Deliverable
number Deliverable name
Short name of lead
participant
Delivery month
D2.1 Energy Efficiency in Urban Regeneration framework report
Tecnalia M4
D2.2 Stakeholder Mapping Report Visesa M4
WP2: Framework Design
Task 2.1: Analysis of existing policies, planning, management and financial mechanisms Task leader: TECNALIA Task participants: Tecnalia, Surbisa, Eve, Visesa, TNO, Utrecht, Sdewes, Osijek, APN • Analysis of current inclusion of Energy Efficient practices in urban regeneration plans, in relation
to: • policies • management procedures • funding sources and financial mechanisms
• The studies are focused in participating countries, and have been used to draw the appropriate conclusions both at National and European scales.
• Revision of existing literature of policies, planning, management and financial mechanisms at European level, including interviews to validate and contrast this information with relevant stakeholders, such as experts from DG Energy and DG Regio.
Deliverable D2.1: Energy Efficiency in Urban Regeneration framework report [month 4]:
This deliverable summarizes the analysis carried out in Task 2.1, enlightening common key issues at European, national, regional and local levels as well as highlighting different understandings of directives across all levels. It will be used in the preparation of workshops with stakeholders, as well as in project dissemination.
WP2: Framework Design
Task 2.2: Stakeholder Mapping Task leader: VISESA Task participants: Tecnalia, Surbisa, Eve, Visesa, TNO, Utrecht, Sdewes, Osijek, Apn, ASM • Based on the analysis carried out in T2.1, partners have identified relevant stakeholders at
different stages of energy efficient urban regeneration projects, at local, regional, national and European levels.
• Analysis of competencies and relationships among stakeholders (who does what and when) • As a result of this task, a list of potential entities and responsible persons is available for its
use in surveys, interviews and participation in workshops in WP3. Informed consent procedures will be followed to engage participants.
Deliverable D2.2: Stakeholder Mapping Report It includes a list of relevant stakeholders and a description of their roles, as well as a diagram visualizing their relationships to the urban regeneration process for each of the participating countries.
WP2: Framework Design
DRIVERS & BARRIERS
FINANCIAL
Banks are not interested in financing EE retrofitting and regeneration
Public financing is focused mainly in specific and non-replicable cases
Long-term processes with no benefits in the short term for companies and owners
High risk level investment due to social profile (low income)
ESCOs not very active in residential retrofitting (not profitable)
TECHNICAL
Noninvasive solutions are difficult to find
Lack of suitable spaces for centralization of heating services
Difficult integration of renewable energy sources in buildings
It is difficult to implement district heating at urban scale
Difficult to manage works at urban level (scaffoldings, storage). Affections to public space
Certain building typologies are difficult to retrofit (historic core/ towns)
SOCIAL
Management of Communities of property owners is difficult to deal with
No legal structure exists for Communities of property owners, makes difficult to finance
(one-by-one basis)
Fragmented property structure
Lack of culture of maintenance of common spaces
Need to balance EE requirements for all stakeholders (utilities, owners, etc.)
Lack of initiative from owners, neighborhood associations, etc.
Low income profiles are the most need of retrofitting
WP2: Framework Design
DRIVERS & BARRIERS
LEGAL/
ORGANIZATIONAL
Difficult to make land-use changes in general. Although in Bilbao we have find easy to
make modifications to adapt Master Plan to urban regeneration plans
Ley 3R* (art. 91): new rules for agreements facilitate retrofitting
Ley 3R: allows to invade public space for EE and accessibility (but not for habitability)
Legal barriers (current regulations) hinder installation of RES and self-consumption
Need to compensate different areas of the city through urban regeneration (surplus
from some areas should finance regeneration of deprived areas). Also in terms of EE
and RES requirements.
Great influence of energy utilities in EE legislation/ politics
MULTI-LEVEL
COORDINATION
Lack of multilevel coordination and transversality (lack of cross-directional
coordination)
Competencies fragmentation (more actors involved, more complex management of
any retrofitting)
Lack of communication, departments working in silos,
WP2: Framework Design
DRIVERS & BARRIERS
Specific (priority) barriers to
address (which barriers should
be focused on in the country
workshops?):
Change legal structure and capabilities of Communities of property
owners
Foster social awareness and engagement for EE regeneration
Involve financial actors
Reduce management complexity
Specific (priority) drivers to
address (which drivers should be
focused on in the country
workshops?):
Fiscal incentives for EE retrofitting and urban regeneration
Short term (easy) wins
WP2: Stakeholder Mapping
WP2: Stakeholder Mapping
WP2: Stakeholder Mapping
• Real estate and urban legal model changed in 2013 (3R Act), new framework and intervention model is needed
• New intervention model implies new policy and management schemes need to be developed
• Previous public administration role (vertical intervention model) must swift to new ways of intervention based on the consensus and co-responsibility of all the stakeholders involved in the process through a bottom-up approach.
• New intervention models implies the challenge of the “collectiveness”, both in the urban scale (i.e. district heating), and the building scale (i.e. the joint retrofitting interventions to incorporate technological improvements and scale economy factors).
WP2: Stakeholder Mapping
• Need for new roles and awareness from all the stakeholders:
– Public administration: Moving from an impositive model to a public-private partnership model, where public administration assumes a supporting and guidance role.
– Owners: Awareness of their relation with the collective values and the nature of the real estate properties as investment goods (not only as shelter).
– Private companies: A non-aggressive speculation business model deployment.
– Banks and Financing agents: New products and financing mechanisms for urban interventions based on multiple owners operations.
– Non profit and NGOs: New legal regulations to enhance their urban management capabilities.
• Need to redefine the public participation in the urban processes (citizens, both owners and tenants). The real bottom-up approach is a new way of taking part in the urban intervention processes