Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Before any interven-ons were undertaken, a baseline was established for the first 5 weeks across the 4 inpa-ent service teams. Average lab orders was 2.8 labs/pa-ent/day. Following the first interven-on on week 6, a non random decrease in lab orders was witnessed as evidenced by a shiE of more than 6 data points below the established mean, reaching a new mean of 2.3 labs/pa-ent/day (a decrease of 18%). This decrease was sustained as further interven-ons were implemented on weeks 12 and 15, although no measureable further decline in lab orders was noted (Fig. 1).
The decline in daily orders was not uniform across all 4 teams, as different teams responded differently to our interven-ons. Team 2 showed the most substan-al decrease in lab orders from 2.6 labs/pa-ent/day to 1.6 labs/pa-ent/day -‐ a 38.5% decrease, well above our an-cipated target of 15% (Fig. 2). Similarly Teams 1 & 3 showed significant decreases in lab orders of 30.5% & 19.2% respec-vely. On the other hand, Team 4 showed no significant improvement maintaining an average lab order of 2.3 labs/pa-ent/day.
More extensive and inclusive data obtained from BMC’s data warehouse of all the labs ordered by all 6 inpa-ent general medicine teams was analyzed. A baseline was also obtained and a decrease of daily lab orders from 3.5 labs/pa-ent/day pre-‐interven-on to 3.1 labs/pa-ent/day post-‐interven-on was observed. This was a decrease of 11.4%. However, 3 weeks following our last interven-on, lab orders started increasing again reaching our original baseline of 3.5 labs/pa-ent/day (Fig. 3).
Introduc)on & Background
Aim
Methods
Our aim was to reduce the number of unnecessary lab orders per pa-ent per day by >15% within 3 months on the inpa-ent internal medicine service at BMC.
Measures: To measure our progress, real -me data was recorded of the number of rou-ne labs ordered per pa-ent by 4 inpa-ent general medicine teams at BMC. This was performed 3 -mes per week on a random sample of 5 pa-ents per team each day and the averages calculated for each team for the week (a total of 15 pa-ents per team per week). Data was recorded con-nuously for 23 weeks. The lab tests we were specifically monitoring were CBC, BMP, CMP, Magnesium and Phosphate. These labs were selected as they are the most frequently ordered labs and are considered rou-ne tests. Interven)ons: In order to accomplish our aim of reducing unnecessary lab orders, surveys were performed to develop root cause analysis driving unnecessary morning orders. Educa-onal interven-ons targe-ng residents involving large group and small group interac-ve teaching and reflec-on sessions were implemented. This provided educa-on about the financial as well as the pa-ent burden of unnecessary labs. Addi-onally, residents’ habits of rou-nely ordering labs without necessarily considering pa-ent impact, treatment strategy, and test cost were addressed. Our second interven-on was geared more towards the a`ending physicians. A`ending physicians were encouraged to conduct rounds dedicated to discussing daily lab orders as well as seang their expecta-ons from the residents. Our third and final interven-on was placing posters in the work rooms on the floors to remind interns and residents to be mindful of their pa-ents’ best interests and think about the benefits and risks before ordering morning labs. Interven-ons were spaced about a month apart in order to gauge both the effects of individual interven-ons, in addi-on to evalua-ng the compounded effect.
Daily labs are ordered rou-nely everyday by residents out of habit. Few wait to think about the benefit of these labs and whether it would have input on the pa-ent’s care. Our simple educa-onal interven-ons and reminders have had a significant impact on reducing unnecessary lab orders. Our interven-ons did not seem to have a cumula-ve effect; rather each subsequent interven-on maintained the same effect produced by the first educa-onal ini-a-ve. However, this effect was only sustainable for a few weeks following the final interven-on, aEer which daily lab orders returned to our original baseline.
This suggests that subsequent interven-ons acted as reminders to our ini-al educa-onal ini-a-ve, and once reminder ceased, residents returned back to usual habits.
We conclude that to be able to effec-vely reduce unnecessary daily lab orders, con-nuous reminders must be implemented following ini-al educa-on about the cost and poten-al harm of unnecessary lab tests.
Results
Conclusion
Excessive laboratory tes-ng contributes to the increasing cost of healthcare without enhancing pa-ent care. Studies have demonstrated increased adverse outcomes and decreased pa-ent sa-sfac-on associated with excessive daily blood draws. Furthermore, unnecessary laboratory tests may contribute to errors, lower pa-ent sa-sfac-on, pa-ent debt burden, hospital acquired anemia, physician informa-on overload, ignorance of crucial data, and need for further tes-ng to follow up on anomalous or incidental results.
Reducing Unnecessary Lab Orders on the Inpa-ent General Internal Medicine Service
Sherif Aly, BS; Faisal Rahman, MD; Alexandra Wong, MD; Mayank Sardana, MD; Tom Peteet, MD; Dane Miller, MPH; Karin Sloan, MD; James Moses MD MPH
Boston Medical Center, General Internal Medicine, Boston MA
Fig. 1: Number of lab tests ordered per pa)ent per day averaged over the week for the 4 inpa)ent internal medical service teams
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Lab
orde
rs
Week
Subgroup Center Target
0 0.5
1 1.5
2 2.5
3 3.5
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Lab
Ord
ers
Week
Subgroup Center Target
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Lab
Ord
ers
Week
Subgroup Center Target
Educa-onal interven-on
A`ending's interven-on
Posters Posted
Fig. 2: Number of lab tests ordered per pa)ent per day averaged over the week for internal medicine team 2 (the highest achieving team in lowering unnecessary lab orders).
Fig. 3: Total number of lab tests ordered per pa)ent per day averaged over the week and obtained from BMC’s data warehouse for all of the inpa)ent general internal medicine service teams.
References
Educa-onal interven-on
A`ending's interven-on
Posters Posted
Educa-onal interven-on
A`ending's interven-on
Posters Posted
Labs Mean
Labs Mean
Labs Mean
1. Salisbury, AC. et al. Diagnos-c blood loss from phlebotomy and hospital-‐acquired anemia during acute myocardial infarc-on. Arch Intern Med 171, 1646–1653 (2011).
2. Sorita, A. The Assessment of Stat Laboratory Test Ordering Prac-ce and Impact of Targeted Individual Feedback in an Urban Teaching Hospital. J Hosp Med 9, 13-‐18 (2014).
3. Thavendiranathan, P. et al. Do Blood Tests Cause Anemia in Hospitalized Pa-ents? Journal of General Internal Medicine 20, 520–524 (2005).