Upload
oilfieldmick
View
228
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
1/75
I.IHAT
IS PRODUCTION LOGGING ?
The
primary
objective
of Production
Loggjng
is the
analyss
of fl
ui
d
movement
systems, defi ni ng
'system'
as some type of
flow
regime
in
a well.
Production
Logging
js
a
method
that
measures
and
records
the
flow
of fluid, ol the effects of the flow
of fluid,
past
the
measuri ng i nstruments
pl
aced
at
varyi
ng
depths
i n
a
produc
ng
or
i
njecti
on wel I
.
Stated simply, a Producti
on Log
I
ocates
the
source of entry
or exit
of the flujd,
jdentfjes
the composition
of the fluid,
nd
quantifies
the
fluid
by
measuring
its rate.
The mai n dj fference
between
Producti on Logs and other
types
of
1ogs, such
as open-hole
or
cased-hole
1ogs,
is
that
Production
Logs
are run whjle
the well
is
under
its
dynamic or
'actjve'
condition, while the other logs
measure a
'fixed'
set of
parameters
usuay
under
statjc condjtjons.
Some of the
quest.i
ons
wh
j
ch
may be
answered
by Product
j
on
Loggng
are:
1.
t^lhat is the flow
profile?
2. trlhat
j
s
the
j
nject'i
on
profj
I
e?
3. Are
al
I
perforat'i
ons
producing
as
p
anned?
4.
Is
undesjred
water or
gas
coming from
a
s'i
ngle
zone?
If
So,
which
zone?
5. Did the
acidizing
or frac
job
perform
as
panned?
6.
Are
there casng,
tubing,
or
packer
leaks?
7 . Are zones effect
vel
y
i
sol
ated?
8. Are
thief zones
present?
9. Is
there
corrosion damage?
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
2/75
10. Are
there
zones that need
to
be
stmulated?
11.
Where
have
the st imulation
fluids
gone?
12. Is the reservojr
depletion
takjng
place
as
i ntended?
Production
Logging
can evaluate
the
behavior
of wells
and
reservoirs
producing
under
stabilized condjtjons.
It
is
often
vi tal ly
mportant
to study
the
performance
of the
j
ni
ti
al
completjon to assure
that
the
mechanical
system is
performing
as
pl
anned.
Subsequent
changes
in the
production/injecton
rates
of
a
gi
ven
wel
I
have
a
s igni
f
i
cant
beari
ng on
the
perf
ormance
of
both
wel I and
reservojr. These
changes
can seriousy affect
maxjmum
economic recovery of hydrocarbons
from the reservojr.
Varyng
permeabil
ities
jn
formations within a
reservo i r
can
lead
to select i ve
drainage
which may leave behind
oil thought
to
have been
produced.
Channels in cement
can
cause unsuspected
dra i
nage
of reserves
set aside for future
productjon.
Channels
can
al so I ead to thi evi
ng
of
producti
on
i
nto adiacent
f ormati
ons.
Production
Loggjng can verify the status
of
a
reserve,
and
keep
current the
p l
ans
f or opt imum reservoi r
dep et
j
on.
D agnosi s before a workover
wi
th Producti
on Loggi ng
can
assure optimum app l
cati on of
remedi
al
procedures.
Repai
rs
are
often
s
i
mp1 fi
ed
and
I
ess
harmful
to the wel I or
reservoi
r
when
the
problems
are
understood and
well defined.
Quite
often
some
types of
remed
j
al
work can be
performed
most economi
cai
I
y
by
using
ony wjrel
jne
services.
2
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
3/75
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
4/75
PRESSURE
CONTROL
In
order to survey
produci
ng and
i n
jecti
ng
wel I s
i
n
thei
r
dynamjc
state, it
js
necessary
to
enter
the well
while
it
is
under
pressure. In
these operations
where
high
pressure exsts,
reducti
on of wel I
head
pressure
to
a
mi
n imum
i
s essent
j
al
to
reduce
the
frictjon of the
wireljne
to
a minimum,
and
to effect a
complete
seal between
the wjreline and
the surround i ng
atmosphere.
Mai
ntenance
of
a
compl ete
seal
i
s
of
pri
me
importance
where the
operati on be
j
ng
perf
ormed w i
I I not
tol
erate
the I oss
of
fl
ui
d,
such
as a
gas
wel I where
venti
ng
to the
atmosphere
woul
d
present
a
safety
hazard,
and
al
so
woul
d
I
et
i ce
form
which
would
freeze-up
the
wirel ine.
The equ
pment
necessary
to
perf
orm
thi
s
operat i
on
i
s
collectivey
called
a
lubricator. A
w ireline
lubricator
system
cons i sts of an
appropri
ate
f
tti
ng
to
f
I
ange
up
to
the wel
I head,
a
wi rel i ne
bl owout
preventer,
a
ri
ser
p
i
pe,
a
control
head
wj
th
a
pressuri zed grease
system,
and
a
hydraul
j
c
packi
ng
g1
and.
In operat on,
the
bl owout
preventer
i s
attached
to the
wellhead
wjth enough
riser
pipe
to
accommodate
the ogging
i
nstruments.
A control
head i
s
attached
to the
top
of the ri
ser
p
j
pe
wh
jch
conta
jns
the well
f
luids
v ,hile allowing
the
instruments
to
be
moved
in
and
out of the
well.
The
heart
of
the
I
ubri
cator
system
i
s the control head.
The
control head
consj sts of two
or
more
fl ow-tube assembl
i
es
put
together i n
seri es,
and
the hydraul
j
c
packi
ng
gl
and.
A
fl
ow-
tube is
a
tube
which
fits t ightly
on
the wireline
and
is
pressure
4
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
5/75
sealed
on
both ends. A
sujtable
grease
js
pumped
jn
between
the
flow-tube
assembljes
at a
pressure
of 500
to
1000
PSI
greater
than
the
exi
st
ng
wel I head
pressure.
The
fl
ow
tubes
create
pressure
drops
across
the
wirel
ine,
wh'ile
the
grease
creates
an
effective
seal impervious
to the
passage
of
the
well fluids.
The
hydraulic
packing
gland
js
a
rubber
seal whjch is
attached
around
the wi rel
i ne
at
the
top of
the control head.
The
rubber
can be
hydraul
jca'l
1y
compressed
ejther
partial
ly
or completely
to
form a
part
a
or
compl ete
seal
around
the wi
rel'i ne.
An
exhaust
hose i s
normal
1
y
attached
between
the
packoff
gl
and
and
the
uppermost
fl ow
tube
assembly.
The
packoff
gl
and
serves
two
important
purposes.
It
al
I
ows
the
I
j
ne
to
be
enti rel
y
packed
off
i f the
grease
seal is Iost, oF
the too'l
s
have
to
be stopped
for
a Iength
of
t'ime. And second'ly, i
f the
rubber
seal
'i
s
iust
parti
al
y
compressed,
i t stri
ps
the
grease
of
f
of the l'ine and f
orces i
t
to
go
out
of the exhaust
hose
where
it can be
properly
dsposed
of
.
The
w'i
rel'ine
blowout
preventeli
s
jdent
jcal in
operation
to
a
gate-type
bl
owout
preventer
found
on rgs.
It consj
sts of two
rams opposite
one another
whjch
may be mechanically
closed
aganst
the wireline.
The
ends of the
rams
have rubber seals
which are
compressed
against
each other with
the
wirel
ine
posit'ioned
jn
the
mjddle.
This
procedure
forms
a
I00
effective
seal
around
the wireline.
The
primary purpose
of a
blowout
preventer
i s i ts use as a
safety
devj
ce
whj ch al
I
ows
the
wel I
head
connect
j
on
to
be seal ed
of f wi th wi rel
'i
ne
remai n i ng i n
the
well.
5
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
6/75
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
7/75
-
EXHA
LINE
FLOW TUBE
ASSEMBLIES
HYDNAULIC
PACKING
GLAND
SEAL
INLET
INSTRUMENTS
RISER
TUSE
ALOWOUT
PREVENTER
+WELLHEAD
PRESSURE
CONTROL EQUIPMENT
vTRELTNE
LuaarcATo+
7,
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
8/75
DEPTH
CONTROL
The
most
'important
aspect
of
any
type
of
wi rel'i ne
operati on
is
prec'i
se depth
control. Accurate
depth resolution
'i
s
essential
to all
the
phases
of well loggng.
0ne
must
be
able
to
correlate
the
'
oggi ng
j
nstruments
to the
perf
orati
ons
i
n the wel I
whi ch
are
in turn
correlated
to
the vary'ing
sands
jn
the
reservo'i
r.
l.lhen a well s
initially
dr11ed,
a
suite of open-hole
ogs
'i
s
usual
I
y
run.
0n
most
of
these 1ogs,
a Gamma
Ray
Log
i
s
usually run in
conjunction
with the
primary
log.
The
G-R
Log
measures the naturally-occurring
radioactivty
of formations
adjacent
to the
bore
hol
e. In
sedimentary
format
ons,
the
G-R
normaly indicates the shale
content of the format'i
on since
radi oacti ve el ements tend
to
concentrate
'i
n
shal e
and
cl
ay.
Although
radjoactive
salts
are
continuay
deposited
on
or washed
av',ay
f
rom
the wel I
bore
duri
ng i ts I f e, the
general
shal
e
characteri
st'i cs remai n
rel
at
ve'ly unchanged and are
easi
y
i
denti
fi ed
throughout
the
I
j
fe of the
wel
I
.
Because
the
formatjon
does
not
physica1y
move, the G-R Log
provides
an
excel I
ent
depth reference.
The first G-R
Log
run
js
referenced to
a
point
0n
surface
usual 1y
the
Kel ly-Bushi
ng wh'i
ch
i
s zero,
or
the start
of the
I
og.
Al
I subsequent I ogs run
are
then
referenced
to
th i s
orignal G-R Log.
After
cas'i
ng
is set
n
a well
and
cemented in
place,
a
Cement-Bond
Log
is usually run. A G-R
Log
is
run in
conjunctjon
w'i th the CBL
and
correlated
to the original
open-hole
G-R Log.
I
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
9/75
The CBL
also
records
the
casing collars
on depth
wjth respect
to
the
G-R
Log.
These
cas ng-col I
ars
provide
another
permanent,
non
-mov
ng,
reference
po
i nt . When
the
wel I
j
s
perforated,
a
collar locator is run in
conjunct i on
with the
perforating
guns.
A Collar Log
is
then
run
pror
to
perforating,
which
assures
that
the
perforatjons
wjll
be
on
depth
with
respect
to
the
open-hole
G-R Log,
which
is
usually
the
log
from which
the
perforated
i
nterval
s
are
p i
cked
.
When
Product ion Logs
are
run in cased hole, the
casing-
col
I
ars are
used f
or the depth
ref
erence.
The Col I ar- Log
i
s run
in
conjunction
wjth
the
different
Production
Logs
ye1dng
a
real
time
depth
control
wjth
each
log.
Usjng
the casing collars as a
permanent
reference,
one
i
s
abl
e to
prec i
sely
I ocate retri evabl e
compl
etj on equi
pment
such
as
packers,
pl
ugs,
fl ow-chokes, etc.
[^Jhen
an
injection
well is completed with
a
single-string-
multiple-packer type
i
nstallation,
it
s
not
possible
to
log the
casing
collars. In this
jnstance,
the injection
equipment
js
ogged with a
G-R
Tubing
Collar
Locator
pri
or to
sett i
ng
the
packers.
This
G-R Log is
then correlated
to the
original
open
hole G-R
Log.
The injection
equ i
pment
can then
be
adjusted
up
or
down
to
place
the
packers
jn
their
appropriate
postions.
Usng
a G-R Log enables one
to
place
the
injection
equpment
in the
wel I bore wi th
an
accuracy of approximately
one
foot. After
the
packers
are set,
we
are
I
eft
wi
th
a
permanent
record of
the
posi
ti on of
the injection equipment
wjth
respect
to the
perforatj
ons
i
n the
wel I
bore.
9
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
10/75
After
the
well has been
placed
on injectjon and an
injectjon
profile
needs to be run,
a
Collar
Log
js
run
in
the tubing
strng
to correl ate the
I
oggi ng
i
nstruments
to
the
wel
I
bore. Thus, al I
flujd losses can
be
accuratey assigned
to
individual
perforati
ons, or zones.
Although
it is surprisingly
simple, the collar-locator
tool
js
probaby
the single
most
valuable tool
jn
the Productjon
Loggi
ng
stri ng. There
are
two
basi
c
types
of Col I
ar
Locators:
1)
Logging
Collar
Locators;
and 2)
Shootng Collar Locators.
The di fference between
the two i s that the
Shoot
ng
Col
I
ar
Locator
js
a
passive
device
and
does
not
need
power
supplied
from
surface to operate. Power i
s
i ntenti
onal ly
kept
off of the
wjreline
during the logging
procedures
to
prevent
the
accidental/premature fjrjng
of the
perforating guns.
A Loggng
Col
I
ar
Locator
runs
para
el wi th
whatever
I
oggi
ng i
nstrument
i
s
current ly
bei
ng
used
and derives i ts
pou,er
f rom the
power
suppl
i
ed
to
the
I
ogg
ng
j
nstrument.
A
Collar
Locator
cons i sts of two cyindrical magnets
separated by
a
coi
l
of very f
ne wi
re v /ound
on
a
spool .
The
magnets
radiate
flux l inei
in
all
directons. tJhen these flux
I i nes
are
cut by
a
ferrous materj al
such
as tubi ng,
col 1
ars,
packers,
etc.,
a
voltage
is induced
across
the
co i l. Appropriate
circutry filters this
voltage
and
conditions
it for surface
recording. A separate circuit at
the
surface
selectvely
ampl
i
f i es any chanq
j
ng
vol
tage
I evel
and
causes the recorder to
respond
to
d i
fferences in
magnetic
mass.
This
response
enables
10
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
11/75
the
Col I ar
Locator
to
see
only
the col ars,
packers,
mandre l
s,
shoes,
etc.
,
rd
not
conti nuous
tubi ng or casi
ng.
lirlj
th
the
ga i
n
propery
adjusted,
a
Collar
Locator
is
sometimes
helpful
in
locating
holes
and
splits or
other
irregularities in
the
tubing
or cas i
ng.
MAGNET
PICKUP
COIL
IANET
LAR
COLLAR
-
LOCATON
CONFIGURATION
COLLAR
NECORDE
ON
SURFACE.
N
.9
.9
N
11
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
12/75
'|
I
I
I
a
a
(
8000
stoo
60
6to
coLLAR
LoG
lN
7 23tb.
cs
COLLAR
LOG IN SELECTIVE
INJECTION
EAUIPMENT
FIELD
EXAMPLES
OF
COLLAR
LOGS
l2
t
\
t
_>
I
I
I
t
t
T
,
-
-
t
t
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
13/75
TEI,IPERATU
E SURVEYS
A Temperature
Survey
i s the
ol
dest
f orm
of
Product i
on
Logging
i
n
existence
today.
There have
been more
techn i cal
papers
written
about
it,
more
loggng
techniques
impemented,
more
tool
s deve l oped, rd
probabl
y
more
ogs
run
than
any
other
type of
Product i
on
Log.
And
Yet,
because
of i ts
i nherent
compl
exi
ty,
t
remai
ns
the I
east
understood
of
al
I
Producti
on
Log s
.
A
Temperature Survey
measures
the effects
that
produced
or
injected
fluids
have
on
the
geothermal
gradient
of
the
wellbore.
Temperature
oggi ng i
s
based on the
assumpti
on
that
the
formati on
surround i
ng
a
wel I
i
s a
1arge,
thermal
ly
stabl
e mass.
Natural
geothermal
gradjents
are
caused
by
the
continuous
flow
of
heat
outward and
upward
from
the
interior
of
the
earth.
Ths
flow
of
heat wi
I I
usual
ly
reach
some
state
of equi I
j
brj
um,
dependi
ng upon
the thermal
conducti
vi
ti
es of the
formati
ons and the
mean
surface
temperature.
t lhen
fIu ids
are
produced
from
or
iniected
into
the
formatj
ons,
the natural
,
or
normal
,
geothermal
gradi
ent
j
s
changed
because
of
the
dj
fferences
i n temperature
between
the
fl uids and
the
surroundi ng
wel I
bore. These
di fferences
between
the
geothermal
gradj
ent
of a
stabi
I
i
zed,
or
normal
we
,.
and
the
gradj
ent when
t
normal
condj
tj ons
have
been
changed,
are
of
ten
used
to
hel
p
i
nterpret
d i
f
f
erent
aspects
of a
wel
I s
beh av
i
or.
To
better
understand
the effects
of
product i
on on
the
geothermal
gradi
ent, both
extremes
must
be
consi
dered.
0ur
13
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
14/75
hypotheti
cal wel I
has
one i
nterval
from
whi
ch i
t
produces.
0ne
extreme
s
zero
fl ui
d
fl ow
from the
produci
ng
i nterval
.
Thi
s
extreme
woul
d
render a
temperature
I
og
wh
i
ch
i
s the
same
as the
normal geothermal
gradient.
The
other
extreme which can
only
be
theoretca1
is
jnfjnjte
flow.
If our well
were
to
produce
at
an
nfinite
rate
the
temperature
of
the
fl uid
when it
reached
the
surface
would
be
the
same
as
the
temperature
of the
fluid
when
it
entered
the wel
I bore.
Thi
s temperature
survey
woul
d
be a
straight
vertjc.al
line
from
surface
to the
bottom
of
the
producing
interval.
Therefore
any
well
condition
between
zero
and
infinity
jn
our hypothetical
we1
would
produce
a
temperature
survey
whose
grad
i
ent
s
ope
woul
d
be
between
the
two
extrettles.
FLOWNA
VELL
INFINITE
FLOW
SURFACE
t
I
t
I
1
t
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
t
I
t
I
\
t
t
PRODUCING
NTENVAL
TEuIPERATURE
INCREASES
ZERO
AND
INFINITE
FLOW
TO
./
14
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
15/75
SHUT-
IN TEMPERATURE
SURVEYS
A
very
important
aspect
of
temperature
I ogg
ng
j
s
the
shut-
in
temperature
survey.
When
a well
is
flow i ng,
the wellbore
temperature
gradjent
is
changed
by
the
f l
ow i
ng
fluids. If
a
well
is shut-jn
and
the
fluid
held
static,
the
wellbore
temperature
is
immediately
affected
by the
formatjon
temperature.
The
wel I
bore
temperatures
then
beg in
to
stabi
I
j
ze and
return
to
thei r
normal
grad ient
temperatures
.
SURFACE
\
PRODUCING
TEMPERATURE
SURVEY
SURVil.LOG
NO.
I
\
\
SHUT-IN
SURVEY.LOG
NO.
2
PRODUCING
INTERVAL
TD
\
NORMAL
GEOTHERAL
GRADIENT
TEITTPERATURE
//NCREASES.-\.
SHUT-IN
TEMPERATURE
SURVEY
In
our
has
built
hypothet
j
cal wel
I
at
up
from
productj
on
the
perf
orated
nterva l
,
The
format i
on
above
heat
the
15
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
16/75
perforations
has bujlt
up
because
the heat
carried
by
the flow
in
the
pipe
has
been
transferred
into
the
formatjon.
trlhen
the
welI
i
s
shut- i
n,
this
heat
js
carried away
from
the
wellbore
as
jt
returns to
gradi
ent. The rate of
gradj
ent
recovery,
or
stab i
I i
zati
on, i
s
dependent
on many
factors
such
as
producti
on
rates,
the amount
of
time the
wel I
has
produced,
d
the
heat
transfer abjljties
of
the rock
conducting
the
heat
away,
etc.
Al so, the
temperature
of the fl
uj
ds
as
they enter
the
wel I bore
i s
qui
te often
h
i
gher
than
that of the
stabj I
j
zed
gradj
ent.
Thj s
difference
in temperature
js
due
to the fact
that
the
fluids
origj
nate
j
n
areas
where
the
gradi
ent
has not
been
di sturbed.
Two
exampl
es
of
th i s temperature
di f f
erence
may
be
f ound
i n:
1.)
wel
I s
produci
ng
from fractured
reservoi
rs where
produced
fl
uids
have
mi
grated
from
deeper,
therefore
hotter
zones through
both
verti
cal
and
horj
zontal fractures,
2.) wel
I s
produci
ng
from
an
j
ncl i
ned
reservo
i r where
fl u
i
ds
tend
to travel upward
as
they
approach
the
wel I
bore.
As
js
evjdenced,
the
longer
the
well
js
left
shut
it, the
cl
oser
the temperature
survey
i s to
the
normal
gradi
ent.
At
the
producing
jnterval
the hot
iquids
jn
the
formatjon are
slowng
the
recovery
to
the
normal
grad
j
ent.
The reduced
recovery
rate
is
appearjng
as
a
heating anomaly at
the
production
zone.
COLD
FLUID INJECTION
fl u i ds downhol
e
from
surface
to
the depth
of
zero
fl
ow,
of
Injectng
normal
gradi
ent
wi
I
I di
sturb
16
no
fluid loss.
the
The
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
17/75
tenperature
gradi
ent and
the
degree
of
separati
on from
the
normal
gradj
ent are
determj
ned
by
the temperature
of the
i niected
flu ids,
the rate
of
iniect i
on,
the
length
of
time
of
jniecton,
and
many
other
varj
abl es.
In our
hypothetj
cal wel
I uJe
can
see
that
whi
I e fl
uids
are
bei ng
j
njected,
the
wel
I bore
above
the
perforati
ons has
been
cooled
by
the injectjon
fluds.
Thjs
cooing has
been
caused
by
the increased
rate
of heat
transfer from
the
formation
into
the
cooler
wellbore.
Below
the injection
interval,
jn
the
area
of
no
fluid
loss,
the
temperature
curve
i
s that
of
the normal
gradent.
When
the well
js
shut
jn
and
the flu id
held
statc,
the
shut-in
gradients
start to
stabjl
jze
and
return
to
the normal
gradjent.
SURHICE
\
\
\
I
9HUT-IN
\
TEMPERATURE
SURVEY.LOG
NO.
I
\
\
aHUT4N
TEUP.
sunuEY
\
SURUEY-LOO
to.
2
IwtECTlOt
INTERUAL
,rry
OEOTHERMAL
GRADIENT
\
\
TD
TEHPERATURE
INCREASES -_>
COLD
FLUID
INJECTION
t7
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
18/75
As
j
n
the case
of
the
produci
ng wel
l
,
the i
niecti
on
'i
nterval
remai ns
cool
er
and
sl ower
to
recover
to
the normal
grad
i ent
because
of
the
colder
fluids
stored in
the
formation.
The
mai
n
app
i
cati
on
for
temperature surveys
i
n
i
niecti
on
wells
js
to identify
the zones
where
'i
nject'i
on has
taken
place.
Because
there are
so
many
uncontrol
I abl
e vari abl
es i n
a water
injection
system,
(e.9.,
flujd
characteristcs,
jniect'i
on rates,
thermal
properti
es of
formati
on
I
j
tho ogy,
thermal
propertj
es of
tubing,
packers,
cas'ing
cement,
etc.,
length
of shut-'in
times,
total
volumes
of
jniected
fluids at
varying
temperatures,
and
probably
a
host
of
othe s,)
OUANTITATIVE
IN
TFRPRFTATTON
OF
TN.IFTTTNN
T
EM
DtrD TTIIDF CIIDVFV TC N
OTP
D^rTTr^l
Al
so,
h
inject'i
on
well
js
usually
part
of
a
very large
flood
pr0gram.
There
are
arge
quantities
of fl uid
moving
through
the
reservo'ir
rock
from
several
di fferent
wel I s at
several
di fferent
pressures
and
temperatures.
0ften
these
wel
I
s i
nteract
and
i nfl uence
each
other,
making
a
quantitatjve
interpretat'ion'impossible.
CHANNELING
Quite
often in an
iniection
we'l
l, fluids
w'i ll
leave
the
wel
I
bore
from
the
perforated
i nterval
and
channel
ej ther
up
or
down
to some
other
po
nt i n
the wel I
bore.
Channel
j
ng
can
be
caused
by
poor
cement
bond,
fractures
cl
ose
to the
wel
1
bore,
corroded
cas'i ng,
etc. In a
produc'i
ng
well, unwanted
flu'ids
can
channel
from zones
other
than the
producing
zone
to the
producing
18
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
19/75
i
nterval .
Temperature
surveys
can be used
qu
te read
1y
to
locate
the
channe'l
ing.
In
the fol 1
ow ng
examp
e, the
i njecti
on
temperature
survey
does
not
return
to
the
normal
gradient
until
some
point
below
the
injectjon
jnterval.
This reaction
indicates
that
some
portions
of the i
n
ject'i
on f
I
u'ids
are
channel i ng
down
the wel I
bore to
a
di
f f erent
zone. The
shut-'in
surveys reveal
the
same
cool
i
ng
anomaly
across the
i nterval
where
the
njected
fl
ui
ds
are
stored.
SURFACE
t
\
t
SHUT.ilV
TELIPERATURE
\
SURUEY-
LOG
NO.
I
\
\
\
SHUT-IN
IHJECTION
INTERUAL
\
SUNVEY-LOG
NO.
2
l--
- f
ZONE:
\
\
\
\
\
\
NORTAL
I
AEOTHERUAL
GRADIENT
TAKI,IG FLUID
NJECTNG
TETAPERATURE
SURVEY
TD
TEnPERATURE
ilCREASES--L.
INJECTION
FLUID
CHANNELING DOWN
lllhen f I
uids
channel
up,
it
'i
s
necessary
to run
one or more
shut in temperature surveys
to identify
the
zone
takjng
the
fluid
19
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
20/75
because
the temperature
of the i ni
ected
fl u
j
ds wi I I mas
k any
anoma'ly
which
might
be
present.
0nce
the
wel I
js
shut-'i
n, it
is
evident
that the
anomaly
js.recovering
to
gradient
at a
reduced
rate.
Therefore,
jt
can be
concluded
that a portion of
the
injected
fl
uids are
exitng
the
perforated
interval and
channel
ing up.
SURFACE
I
\
\
\
9HUT-tw
\
\
SURVEY-LO
NO.
t
\
\
EONE/
\
\
TAKING
FLUIP
\
\
9HUT-1il
TET'PERATUPE
\
SURVEY- LOG
NO.
2
t&tEcTtot
NTERUAL
\
\
\
\
INUIECTING
TETIPERATURE
sunvEY
\
\
NORMAL
\
--GEOTHERbIAL
(
aRADnENT
\
n
\
TET'PERATURE
IICREASES
E.
INJECTION
FLUID
CHANNELING
UP
GAS
PRODUCING
Free
gas
producti
on
j
nto a
wel
I
temperature
anomal
y.
[,{hen
gas
j
n
a
w'i
ll result in a
definite
to a
lower
20
format
i on moves
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
21/75
pressure, it
undergoes
a
temperature-volume
change.
Th i
s
change
commony
occurs
jn
a
well where
there
are
perforat i
ons
in
a
cased
hole,
and
at
the
producing
formation
face
in
an
uncased
hole.
As
the
gas
enters
the
wellbore,
the
pressure
js
suddenly
dropped,
causing
an
increase
in vo l ume,
which
consequent ly
causes
a
drop
j
n
temperature.
The effect
that the
temperature
tool measures
j
s
a
cool
i
ng of the
gas
assoc i
ated
wi
th
j
ts expans
i on.
0ur f i rst
examp l
e shows a
gas
entry
i nto
the
wel I bore.
As
the
gas
leaves
the
pore
spaces
i
n the
formation
and
enters the
wel
I
bore,
i
t
expands,
creat
ng a
cool
i ng
ef f ect at
the
po i
nt
of
entry
and
above.
\
\
t
\
PRODUCING
SURVEY
NORMAL
\
GRADIENT
\
\
PRODUCIN6
NTERUAL
\
\
TD
T,EI|IPERATURE
INCREASES ->
GAS
ENTNY
2T
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
22/75
The
gas
i s then warmed,
crosses
the
geothermal
gradi
ent
I
i
ne, nd
cont'inues
upho
e
paral
l
el to
the normal
grad'i
ent,
but
at a
higher
temperature. The
temperature
change
at
such
an
entry
wjll
be
affected
by
the
amount
of
gS,
the
pressure
drop,
and
the
movement
of
other
fluids by
the
entry.
0ur second exampl e shows a
producj
ng
wel I wj
th
gas
bei
ng
produced
wi
th the
o
j
I .
The
produc'i
ng
temperature
I og
shows
normal
heating
due
to oil
production.
There are,
hotvever,
sl ight
cool i ng anomal i
es
across
the
produci
ng i nterval
caused
by
the
gas
enteri
ng the
wel I
bore
w'i
th the
o'i
I
.
l'lj
th the
wel
I shut- i n,
gradi
ent
recovery
temperature 1
ogs i ndi
cate secti
ons of the
perforat
j
on s cool
ng
due to the
gas product
i on
.
SURFACE
PRODUCING
TEMPERATURE
SURVET
gHUT.N
NORTIAL
GEOTHENMAL
6RAOEilT
/ ,
SURUEY.LOG
NO. I
SHUT.IN
TURE
SURVEY-LOG
NO.
2
TD
./
TEMPERATURE
INCREASES
OIL
WITH
GAS
ENTRY
?.2
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
23/75
SURFACE
I
t
I
I
I
I
SHUT.N
TEMPERATURE
TOP
OF
t
t
I
I
APPROX.
CEMENT
coLunU
12
HOURS
AFTER
CEIENT
IN
PLACE
t
t
t
t
t
NORMAL
I
GEOTHERMAL
GRAOENT
t
t
t
I
I
I
I
t
t
t
t
t
TD
TEnPERATURE
mCEASES
------\
LOCATING
TOP
OF CEMENT
LOCATING
CE].iIENT
TOPS
0ne of the
ol
dest
uses
of temperature
surveys
i
s to I ocate
the
cement
top
af
ter
a
stri
ng
of
cas i ng
has been
cemented i n
pl
ace.
As
the
cement sets,
oF
cures,
j
t
undergoes
an
exotherm ic
reaction
and
gjves
off
heat
to the surrounding
wellbore. If a
temperature
survey is run
while
this reactjon is
taking
place,
or
i
f the
cement
has
been
over-pl
aced,
the
survey
wi
I
I
show
h
i
gher
temperatures
at
the
depths corresponding
to the
cement column.
Thjs survey should
be run wjthin
24
hours after
the cement
job
to
obtajn
optimum
results.
23
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
24/75
SUNFACE
\
\
\
t
t
I
I
BASE
t
TETPENATURE
SURUEY
t
1
t
I
I
I
AFTER FRAC
I
\
I
I
TEiIPERATURE
SURVEY
NORMAL
I
ZONE
ACCEPTING
FRAC FLUID
GEO
t
GRADIENT
I
I
I
t
I
t
I
t
rD/
TURE
INCREASES
FNAC EVALUATION
FRAC
(AFTER
ACrp) EVALUATI0N
Temperature
I
ogs can
be
used
to
eval
uate
frac
iobs
i
n
much
the
same
way
as
they are
used
on water
j
n
ject i
on
wel
l
s, di f f eri ng
only
jn
the
fact
that
a
frac
usually
has hgh injection
rates
and
comparative ly
short
injection time.
A base temperature
survey i s
run
pr
or
to
the frac
to
gi
ve
a
normal
grad
j
ent
because
the
geothermal
grad
i ent
probabl
y
has
been
altered
by
production
or injection.
Interpretatjon
of
the
frac
eval
uati
on temperature log
depends on
a
measurable
dj fference
between
the
i
njected frac fl
uid
temperature
and the
ambi
ent temperature of
the
formati
on
pri
or
to
the frac.
24
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
25/75
If
the
frac
fl
ui
d i
s
hotter
than
the
formati
on temperature,
the entl
re wel
I
bore
wi I I have been
heated
above
normal
formati
on
temperatures. Also,
the
jntervals
that received
the
frac fluids
will exhibit a
slorder
recovery
rate in
returning
to
the
original
formation
temperature.
As
with
any
fl ud
iniection
system,
the
rate
of
recovery
js
dependent
upon
the
amount
of
frac
fluids
i
nvol
ved and
the
temperature
di
fferences
encountered.
lllhen
acjd
is
injected
into
a
well
for
stimulation
or other
purposes,
temperature
surveys
can
be used
to
identify
the
zones
takjng the
fluid, in much
the
same manner as
the
frac evaluaton
applicatjon.
There
may
be
minerals
present
wjthin the reservo in,
such as
carbonates,
whjch
have an
exothermal
reaction
wjth acd
which
will create
a measurable
increase in
temperature.
The
presence
of m inera l
s
ntroduces
an
add itional
f actor along
with
the
normal formati
on
temperature and
usual
1
y
cool er treatment
fl i
ds, thus maki ng
i
t even
more
crj
ti
cal to have a
base, or
reference
survey pri
or to
the
aci
d
treatment.
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
26/75
SURFACE
I
=
I
I
DIFFERENTIAL
I
TURE
I
SURUEY
\
AASOLUTE
I
\
SURVEY
\
\
\
t
I
I
I
ARGE SPONSE
I
STIIALL
STIALL
TETIPERATURE
ANOTIALIES
t
SLOPE
CHANGES
I
t
t
\
I
\
\
NORIAL
GEOTHERTAL
GRADIENT
I
t
^/
D
I
\
TEUPERATURE
INCREAS
DIFFERENTIAL
TEMPERATURE
SURVEY
I
DI FFERENTIAL
TEMPERATURE
0ne
type of survey
presentati
on
whi
ch i s
qu ite popu
ar
i n
many
areas
j
s
the
Di
fferentj
al
Temperature
Curve.
A
di
fferenti
al
temperature
survey measures
the
rate
of change of the
gradj
ent
curve. This
survey
allows
identification
or
amplfjcat ion
of
small anomal
jes
which
may not
appear
sgnjfjcant
on the
absolute
temperature
curve. D i
fferentj
al
temperature surveys
are normal ly
run when I
arge
s1 ope
changes
are not anti
ci
pated.
The
Di
fferent
i
al
Temperature
Curve
j
s
derj
ved
el
ectron
ca1 I
y
on
the
surface by
measuring
rates
of
temperature change
0ver
a
repetitive
time interval
. It
js
normal ly
run
simultaneously
w i th
the
absol
ute
temperature curve.
26
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
27/75
RADIOACTIVE
TRACER
SURVEYS
A
Radioactjve
Tracer
Survey evaluates
flow
characteristics
both
j
ns i de and
outsj
de the
wel I bore.
A
tracer
survey
i
nvol
ves
releasing a
dose
of
radjoact ive
materjal
in
the
wellbore
and
then
trackng
and
t imjng
its
movement
with a
gamma-ray
tool.
This
type
of
survey offers
versatil
ity
in fluid
flow
analysis
because
tracer
materials
can
be
selected
which
are
in
the same
phase
(o1,
water,
or
gas)
as
the
fluid
desired
to be
measured,
and
which
have
the
i
nherent abity
of
gamma
rays
to
penetrate
ayers
of
p
jpe
and
cement,
a l
I owing
tagged
f I uids
to be
traced
outs
jde
the
wel I bore.
By definjt i
on
a
gamma-ray
is
the
spontaneous
emjssion
of
energy
as
the nucleus
of an
unstable
atom
djsintegrates.
These
gamma-rays
can
be
detected
and measured
by
using
e ither
a
Geger-
Mueller
detector,
or a
sc i ntillat i
on detector.
In normal
ojl
field
use
the G-tvl
detector
js
preferred
because
of
jts
ruggedness, and
jts abity to
withstand
the
v i
brations
and
shock
f
ound
i n
a
produc i
ng or
i
niecti ng
wel
l
.
By far
the
most
common
radi
oacti
ve
tracer
used
j
s
the
isotope
Iodine-131.
I-131
is used
ma i n1y
for
jts
short
half-life
of
8.05
days.
Half
-l
ife
i
s the amount
of
time
required
for
the
isotope
to decay
to
one
half
of its
origna1
ntensty.
The
amount
of
rad
j
at
j
on
i
s
measured
j
n
Curi
es,
wi
th
one
Curi
e
equaling
3.7 X
1010
disintegrations
per
second.
For
tracer
survys,
a
Curie
is
a
large
amount,
so
the millicurje,
oF
i/1000
27
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
28/75
of
a Cur
e, i s used.
A
typ ica l
Radi
oacti
ve Tracer
Survey
uses
no
more
than
l0
mill i
curie of
radioactive
material
.
Another.important
property
wh i
ch
one must
cons i
der when
selecting a sujtable
R/A
tracer is jts
energy
level.
The
energy
level of a rad i
oactive
materi al
is measured
by
jts
penetrat i
ng
ab l
ity,
and
expressed
in unjts
of millions
of
electron
volts
(MEV).
The
hgher the
MEV level,
the
greater
the
energy
of
the
gamma-rays,
and
therefore
the
greater
the
penetrating
power.
I-
131
has
a
relatively medium
MEV
level of 0.364.
As stated
ear i
er,
tracer
materi al
can be
tai I ored
to match
whatever
phase
i
s
present
to
be
measured.
Actual I
y,
the carrj
er
of
the R/A material is
such
that it is
compat i ble with
the fluid
to be
analyzed.
There
are
water-based,
ol
-based,
and
gas-based
tracers
avai
I
abl
e. The tracer
materi al
must
be neutra
I
y
buoyant
in
the
fluid that
i
s to be measured.
There are
two methods
empl
oyed to transport
the
R/ A
materi
al to
the
po i
nt
i
n
the
wel
I
bore
where
the
survey
j
s
to
take
p1
ace.
The most
common method
i s to
use
a
downhol
e ejector
tool. The ejector
tool
can be
thought
of as
an
electro-
mechan
i cal
syri nge.
The
R/
A
tracer materi
al
j
s
stored
j
n
a
cyljnder
which has a
piston
ol
one end and
an
eiection
port
on
the other.
The
p i
ston
js
activated
by
a
motor
whjch
is
controlled at the surface by the operator.
Normal
tool
capacitjes
range
from 30 to 100
cc s.
Any sjze slug
may be
released
at
any
g i
ven time.
The
other
method
used
to
introduce
the
tracer
materi al
to the we I bore,
i s to
j
niect
i t from
the
28
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
29/75
surface.
The majn
d i
sadvantage
of
this
technique
is
that
usually
the
slug
is
widely
dissipated
by
the time
i
t
reaches
the
area
of interest;
nevertheless
this
method
is sometimes
the
ony
alternatjve
when
areas
such
as
an
annulus
need
to
be
surveyed.
Most
quant
i
tati
ve tracer
surveys
are
cal
cul ated
by
measurj
ng
the vel
oci
ty of the wel
I
fl
uj
d.
Vel
oc ty
can
be
defi
ned
as
distance
traveled/unit
of time,
(e.9.
miles/hour,
feet/second,
etc).
By i
ntroduci
ng
a
s
ug
of R/ A materi al
i
nto
the
fl owstream,
and
then
measuri
ng
the amount
of
t ime
requi
red
f
or
i
t to travel
a
gi
ven di
stance,
the
average
vel ocity
of
the
fl
owstream
can
be
calculated.
Typcally,
units
of barrels
per
day
are
used
n
f l
uid
prof
l
i ng.
By measuri
ng
the
ve
oc i ty of
the desi
red
f l
uid
we
can
calculate
jts
rate
in B/D by
the
following:
RATE_FACTORXDISTANCE
Where:
RATE=BARRELS/DAY
FACTOR=BARRELS
PER
LINEAL FOOT TI1 lES
THE
SECONDS
IN A
DAY
DISTANCE=DISTANCE
IN
FEET THE
RIA
SLUG TRAVELED
TIME=Al\4OUNT
OF TIME
IN
SECONDS FOR
R/A
SLUG
TO TRAVEL
DISTANCE
USED
For exampl
e:
seconds
A
R/ A
s
ug
travel ed
200
i n 2-3/8
tubi ng
i n 28
FxD
There are
several
velocities.
Some
are:
RATE
=
RAT
E
(
Factor
deri
ved
from
tab
e)
d
i fferent techn
i
ques
emp
oyed
to measure
333
x 200
______28-
RATE
=
2379
B/D
velocty
shots
eocity
shots
echnique
tor
rV
st
I
2
3
4
Sng
e
detec
Dual detecto
Multiple
pas
Drop check
29
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
30/75
Aj
though
i
t
j
s
not a ve oci
ty
measurement,
another
techni
que
that
w i I I
be dj scussed
i
s the
percent
I oss tracer method
.
30
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
31/75
SINGLE
DETECTOR VELOCITY
SHOTS
In ths method,
the tracer ejector
tool is
placed
a
known
d i
stance
above
the
gamma-ray
tool.
The
tool string is
paced
in
the wel
I
bore where the ve1
oc ty i s to
be obtaj
ned
and hel
d
stati
onary.
l^lhen
the R/
A materi
al
i
s rel eased f
rom the
e
jector
tool
,
i
t
mi xes
wi th the fl owstream and
i s
carri ed down
past
the
gamma-ray
tool . At the
surface the recorder
i s
p l
aced
on
ti
me-
drive. When
the slug is
ejected from
the
tool a mark
is recorded
whi
ch
s tme zero. The
recorder
then
moni
tors
background
radiation as
the slug
approaches
the detector.
As the
slug
passes
the
detector, ts
peak
intensty
is recorded.
Because
the
recorder
i
s
on time dri
ve, the I
og
i s
a
functi
on
of time.
The
i nterval
between the
two
peaks
i s measured and
correl
ated
to a
time
expressed
in
seconds. The
previous
equation
can
then be
used
to deri ve the rate
i n B/D.
To
obta i
n mul ti
p
e vel oc ty
shots
jn injectjon
we11s,
the
loggng
tools
are
lowered
to
the
I owest
zone
of i nterest
and
a
rate i s
obtai
ned.
The tool
str
ng
is then
rajsed
to
the next
station
and
the
process
repeated.
The
statjons chosen are usualy
sections
of blank
ppe
between
perforated
i nterval
s.
Pl
otti ng
these
vel
oc
i
ty shots of
rate
versus depth wjll
provjde
an njection
profile.
31
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
32/75
o
I
R/A
EJECTOR
DISTANCE
TRAVELED
GAI}IT} A-RAY
DETECTOR
SINGLE.DETECTOR
GAMMA.RAY
VELOCITY
SHOT
32
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
33/75
U DE
ECTO
VELOCI Y
The
dual
detector
method utjlizes
two
gamma-ray
detectors
whjch
are run
simultaneously
and
spaced
a
known
distance
apart
to
obtain
the travel distance.
The
detectors
have
opposite
output
pu l
ses
whi
ch
are
sel ectvey di
scriminated
on the surf ace.
Instead of recording
the
time
for a sug
to
leave the eiector and
pass
the detector, this method measures
the time
for
an aready
wel I
mj
xed
s
ug
to
pass
each of the two detectors.
Thi
s method
is
more
accurate
jn
lamjnar
flow s ituat i
ons, because
i
t
allows
the R/
A
materi al
to
become
better mi xed
j
n the fl
owstream.
The
logging appicatjon
is identical
to that of the
snge
detector
method, w i
th the tool
string
held statonary
at
the areas
to be
investgated,
fld
then
moved
to
the additional
stations.
0n
the
surf ace,
each
gamma-ray
curve i s
recorded on the
t ime
drive
independent of the
other. The time interval is measured
between
the two
gamma peaks.
33
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
34/75
o
I
I
R/A
EJECTOR
TOP
GAMMA-RAY
DETECON
TRAVELED
BOTTOTI
GAMMA.ftAY
DETECTOR
DUAL -ETECTOR
aAMMA.RAY
VELOCITY
SHOT
34
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
35/75
MIII TT PI F PASS TFCI{N TNIIF
In many wel I
compl etions
the
po'int
of
f I
uid
exit f rom
the
tub'i ng
is
below the
perforated
jntervals
in
the
wellbore.
Th'i
s
type
of
completion
makes
it
physically
impossible
to
place
the
survey
tool
s
between the
perforated
nterval
s. In a
compl etj
on
of
th
i
s
type, i t
'i
s necessary
to
empl
oy
the mul
ti
pl
e
pass
technque.
This
'l
ogging
procedure
is
based upon
following
a
sngle shot
of R/A material
'i
n the
flowstream
and
recording
ts
peak
intensities
on depth
versus
tme.
After the
s'l ug
is
rel eased
'i
nto
the f I
owstream,
the
gamma-
ray
tool
i
s
pul
l ed up
through
the slug with
the recorder
set
on
depth
drjve.
Subsequent
passes
through
the same slug
will
show the changing
depth
of the slug, rd
by carefully
noting
the total elapsed
times
of the
peak
radiatjon
intensjt'ies,
the fluid
veloc'itjes
can
be calculated
at
the various
depths in
the wellbore.
In
application,
the
slug
is
ejected
into
the
area
of 100 total
flow
and
a rate establjshed. All
subsequent
rates
are then
measured,
and an injection
profile
is
constructed.
The multiple
pass
technique is the method
whjch
is used
jn
obtaining
an
jnjection
profjle
jn
a
single-string-multiple-packer
type
compl eti
on. f.lhen surveyi ng
th s type
of compl et on,
the
slug is released into
the flowstream
above
the
mandrel
jnjecting
into
the
zone
to
be
logged.
The
sug
'i
s
then
logged
as
it
moves
up
or
down the
annulus.
35
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
36/75
The
wel I
bore
velocty
multp1e
pass
technque
js
also
used
in
areas
i
n
the
where the fluid flow
is too slow
to
ut i
l i
ze
detector
shots. It
i
s
al
so
used
to
confi rm areas
of
no
fl
ow.
36
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
37/75
5900
PACKEN
PERFS
FLO}Y
MANREL
6000
PACKER
MULTIPLE
PASS
TECHNIQUE
IN
TB6 CS6
ANNULUS
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
38/75
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
39/75
ROP CHECK
9
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
40/75
PERCENT
LOSS TRACER
METHOD
Al
though the
percent
I
oss
tracer method
does not
measure
fluid velocties,
jt js
an
accurate,
guant itat ive
jnterpretatjon
of flujd loss. Also called the
self-method,
th i
s
technique
measures
fluid
losses
in
jnjectjon
wells
by measurjng
the
amount
of R/A material
lost
to the formation.
The
main
appcatjon
for
this method
js
to
obta in
jnjection
profjles
i
n uncased
or
open
hol
e compl etj
ons. Al I
of the fl ui
d vel oci ty measurement
methods
d i scussed
prev i
ously have assumed
that the
bore
hol
e
diameter
remain
constant across
the
i
ntervals
where the
measurements
are
being taken.
The self-method
i
s independent
of
borehole
diameter, making
it
most
su itable
for irreguary
shaped
borehol es.
The
appl
cation
of
thi s technique
i
s
identical
to
that of
the
multp1e
pass
technque.
A
singe
R/A
slug
i
s released
jnto
the
fl ow
above
the
fi rst i nterval
of fl u i d I
oss,
fld
repeatedl
y
logged
on
depth
drive until the
slug
either
disperses
into
the
format
on, or ceases to move.
Record
ng
the tjmes
of
peak
intensities
is
not
necessary
for
this
method.
After
the
sl ug has
been
I ogged unt
i I zero
fl ow
has
been
establ
i
shed,
the
chart
paper
j
s
removed
from
the
recorder.
Using a
straight edge,
the
ind i
vidual
R/A s l ugs are
trjanguated . First,
a
vertical line is
drawn
for
the
average
base line
of each run.
Next,
nes
are
drawn
along
the
sopes
of
the top
and
bottom
of the i ntens i
ty
peak.
These
I i
nes
are
extended
to i ntersect
at a
poi
nt to the r
ght
of the
j
ntens
i
ty
40
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
41/75
peak
and
the
base
I'ine. The
di stance f
rom
the
base I i ne
to
the
i
ntersecti
on
of the
i nterface
I i
nes
j
s
termed
the
'hei
ght'
.
The
di stance between
the
i
ntersecti
ons
of
the
'interf
ace
I
i nes
wi th
the
base
I
i
ne
i
s
termed
the
'base'
.
Start
ng wi
th the
fj rst
tracer
recordi
ng
after
the
radioactjve
material
js
dispersed
jn
the well
fluid,
the
heght
and
base
of the recorded
curve
are
added.
Because
the
first
og
is
conducted
pri
or to
any
fluid lossn
jt'i
s
a
100 flow'l
ogging
run.
As
fl uid
j
s I ost
to
the
formation,
the I oss
j
n radj
oactj
ve
jntensity
of the
gamma-ray
recordj ng
on sUcceeding
ogg ng runs
wjll
be
proportional
to
the
amount
of fluid
leavng
the
wel'lbore.
By uslng
the
I00
flow
logging
run as a
basjs
for
comparison,
the
sum of
the
helght
and
base
of the
reduced
intensity
recordings
can
be
def i ned as a
f racti
on
of the
total
i
ni
ected
s1
ug
.
Us'ing
these
amounts
of
R/A materials
'lost'
to
the
formation,
an
i
njecti
on
profi
I e
can
be
constructed.
41
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
42/75
PACKER
CSG
SHOE
5'
.-r-_;
-
I
)
?-
*-__,
I
(*
--__-
--)
FROM
-:
CALIPER
LOG
..
a
I
\
\,
t '
e'
al
'-'
\\-r
t
f'
'--i-
I
,
a-\\\\
\
t
NREaULAR
SHAPED
SOREHOLE
--\_
,:
t
I
,
PER-CENT
LOSS
TRACER
METHO
42
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
43/75
OTHER USES
Because of
the
tracer
materi al
s
abi l
ity
to
m
j
x
wi
th the
fluids
belng
measured, fluid movements
can
be
traced
anywhere in
the
wellbore
that flujd s
moving.
Tracers
are
commonly
used
to
check
the
mechan
jcal jntegrity
of f
I
u id
sol at ion
dev ices such
as
packers, plugs,
casing shoes, I iner
hangers,
water-shut-offs,
fl oat
co
1
ars,
cement
squeezes,
etc,
Tracers
are
very often
used
to
check
the extent
of
channeing and
fluid m igraton.
As long
as
a
small
quantity
of
R/A material
can
be
paced
jn
the
fluid
system
to
be
anayzed, a
quantitat ive
as well as
qual
jtatjve
conclusion
can usually
be
drawn.
43
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
44/75
SPINNER/FL0HI4ETER
The
spinner/flowmeter
js
a
logg ing
jnstrument
which
js
used
to
measure
the flow velocity
of
a
flujd within
the wellbore.
It
consj
sts of
an
mpel
I
er
mounted
on
a shaft
whi
ch
i
s
coupl
ed
to
some
type
of
sendng
device;
usuay
magnetic.
When the
tool
is
p1
aced
i n a
fl
ow-stream
movj
ng
above
a
certai n
mi
nimum
vel
oc
ty,
the
impeller
will
sp in
at a
rate I inearly
proportional
to
the
flow
velocity. The
mpeller, in
turn, cuses
the
sending
dev ice
to spn
at
the
same
rate
which
produces
an
electronjc
signa 1.
The
sgnal
js
then
amp l
ified,
condjtioned, and
sent
to
the
surface via
the wireline.
An
i
ncrease
or
decrease of
the
fl
u
i d
fl
ow
past
the
tool
i s
sensed by an
increase
or decrease
jn
the frequency
of the
output
sgna l
which
is directly
proportional
to the
RPM s
of
the
rotatng mpeller
blade. These
changes
in
RPM s
can be
d irectly
related to
changes
i
n the
amount
of
flu
jd
moving
jn
the well.
Knowing
where
the jntervals of fluid loss or
ga i
n are
jn
rel ati
onshi
p
to the
wel
I
bore
enabl
es one to
construct
the
fl
uid
prof
1e.
There are three
bas ic types
of
spinner
tools used
in flujd
profiling.
These are:
1) Inflatable
packer
flov lmeter;
2)
The
continuous
spinner/ f
lowmeter;
and
3) The full
-bore
sp i
nner/
fl
owmeter.
The i nfl
atabl
e
packer
fl
owmeter has
an
i nfl
atabl
e
bl
adder
affixed be l
ow
the
mpeller.
The tool
js
postioned
in
the
wel I
bore
where
the vel
oci
ty
readi
ng
i
s to
be
taken. The
tool s
44
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
45/75
are
hel
d
stati onary
whj I
e the bl
adder
i s
j
nfl ated.
When
the
bladder
is fully
inflated,
jt
forms a
'packer'
aganst
the
wel
I
bore.
Al
I
of the wel
I fl
ui
ds are
forced
through
the
bl
adder
and
across
the
meter
ng
sect
j
on
.
The
advantage
of
.
th
j
s tool
j
s
that 100
of the fluid flow
can be
measured at
any
g'i
ven
point
in
the
wellbore.
The disadvantages
of this tool are:
1)
it is very
ted ous
and
time consum'i ng;
2) the
bl
adder
i s of ten
damaged
by
bad
casng
and
rendered
inoperable; and
3)
the
tool has a
maximum
fl uid
vel
octy
that it
can
measure
without
bejng hydraul
jcal
ly
forced up the
hole.
Because
of
the
many
djsadvantages
assocjated
wi
th the
packer-fl
owmeter, i
t i s rarely used
and i
s
currently
bej ng
phased
out
j
n
most
areas.
The contnuous
spnner/flowmeter
is,
by far,
the
most
widely
used
spnner
today.
The
general
design of
thjs spinner
js
shown
'i
n
the illustration. The
tool
js
of
generally
simple
desgn,
rugged
construction,
fld
can
pass
read
y
through
most
types
of
tub
ng
compl
eti
ons.
The
impel
I
er
on thi
s tool
i
s
general
ly I/4'
smal I er
than
the maxj mum
0.
D.
of
the
tool
stri ng.
The
bow-
spri
ng
type centralizers ajd
in
the
centering
of
the impeller in
the
wel I bore where the area
of
most
tui.bul
ent f I
ow
oe e
u'rs.
As i
ts
name implies, thjs
spinner
is
run as
a
continuous,
uhinterrupted
survey across
the
j
nterval
to be
1 ogged. Advantages
of thj s
tool
are: 1)
i
ts
ruggedness;
2)
i
ts
f I
ex'i
bl
e
construct'i
on
al
I owi
ng
j
t to
pass
freely
through
tubi
ng
and
other
restri
ctj
ons;
3)
comparati
vel
y
I ow mai
ntenance;
and
4) reduced
ogg
ng
times
as
a
result
of bejng
able
to run a
c0nt'i
nuous
survey,
as
opposed to
45
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
46/75
one
jn
which
the tools must be stopped,
and
stationary
readngs
taken. Disadvantages
of thjs tool
are:
1.)
its relatively high
by-pass;
(
i
.e.
,
the
mi
njmum
amount of fl
ui
d fl
owi ng
past
the
impeller before it starts to turn); and 2.) it's lack
of
sensi ti
vi
ty
to
smal
I
changes
compared
to
the other types.
The
full-bore
spinner/flowmeteri
s
a
compromjse
of the two
previ
ous sp'i
nners. There are two types of
f ul I
-bore
sp'inners:
1.
)
basket-type
spi nners
;
2.
)
and
des'igns
impl ementi ng a I arge
diameter
impeller
blade.
The
basket-type
spnner is similar
to
the
packer-fl
owmeter,
but
i
t
uti I izes
a
co1
apsi
bl e basket
to
divert
neary
all of the flujd
past
the
mpeller
blade.
This
sp'i
nner has
the advantage
of be'i ng
abl
e to be
run conti nuously
across the wel
I bore. It
wi I I
al
so
co'l
apse
to
al
I ow
passage
through
restr
j
cted di
ameters. The
arge
di
ameterimpel
I er
type
utjlizes a spinnelimpeller
whose
sjze
is
80
to
90
of
the
insjde
diameter
of the
pipe
bejng
logged.
The desgn
of this spinner is
hghly
compl
icated
and
quite fragile
due
to
the
necessity
of
the
'impeller
blade
to fold
up while the
tool is being conveyed
through the
tubi
ng.
Advantages
of thi
s
tool
are: I
)
i
ncreased
sensjt'ivities
for better
response
at lower flow rates;
and ?)
tool
is faster
to
run as
a
contjnuous
type tool
as
opposed to
one
whi ch must
be
stopped
to take i
ndj vidual
read
ngs. Dj
sadvantages
are:
l) tool
is farly fragle,
and
great
care
must
be
taken
when the tools
are
passed
through small
restrictions
as
to
not
damage
the
blades;
and
2) tool
js
a
very
high maintenance item.
46
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
47/75
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
48/75
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
49/75
SPINNER
TOOL
CONFIGURATION
SPINNER
SURVEY
ONJECNON
VELL)
RPMs
INCREASES
PACKER
rAL
CASING
SPINIIER
15
RUN
OPPOS|w
OIRECTION
OF
FLUID
FLO U,
AREAS
N
VELLBONE
OF FLUID LOSS
OW-SPRING
CENTNALEER
o/o
FLUI FLOW
o
50
too
TD
SPINNER /
FLOWMETER
49
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
50/75
FLUID IDENTIFICATION
When
runnng
a
fluid-entry
survey,
jt
is necessary
to
i denti fy the type of fl ui
d
as
i t enters the wel I
bore. The
identifjcation
js
accomplshed
wjth the aid of Fluid
Identification tools,
these tools must
be
able
to
djfferentjate
between
the d i f f erent
phases
present
in
the wel
bore, such as
oi
l
-tntater,
o
j
l
-gS,
or
o i
l
-water
and
gas,
and
al
so
be
abl e
to
pi
npoj
nt
the
prec i
se
I
ocati
on of these entri
es
j
nto
the
wel.l
bore.
There
are
two types of these
.
tool
s current
y
j
n use today
the
capacitance
tool,
and
the fl ujd-densjty tool
.
CAPACITANCE TOOL
By defjnit i
on, capacjtance is the
property
of
an
electric
nonconductor wh
i
ch
perm i
ts the storage of
energy
as
a
resul t of
el ectri
c
di
spl
acement when
oppos i
te surfaces of the
nonconductor
are
maintajned at a djfference
of
potent i
al.
Stated
simply,
capac itance
j
s
the measure
of
the
ab
1
ty of
a
dev
j
ce, such
as
a
capacitor, to store
an
electrical charge. A
smpe
capacitor
consi sts of two conducti ng
pl
ates
separated
by some non-
conducting substance whjch is
called
dielectric
materjal.
When
one
of
these
pl
ates
j
s charged
w ith an
el
ectri
cal
f
orce,
and
the
other
pate
he. d at the
opposite
potential
,
jt
is sajd
to
have
capacity.
There
are
three
parameters
whj
ch
affect
the
capaci
ty of
any
capacj
tor:
I
)
The
type
of
dj
el
ectri c
materj
al
2)
The
size of the
conducting-plates
3) The
dstance
between
the
pates
50
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
51/75
P
L
A
T
E
NEOA
AELECTRrc
MATERIAL
POS|nVE
CHAR6E
CHARGE
EASIC
CAPACITOR
The
probe
of
the
capaci
tance
tool i s
des
i
gned
to
act as
a
capacjtor. It
consists
of
a
conductng cyindrjcal
probe
wh i ch
is
insulated
from the tool body.
This
probe
functons
as
one of
the
plates
of
the capacjtor.
Surrounding
thjs
probe
is
a
cage
which
allows the well flujds
to
pass
freely
through
jt.
This
cage
acts
as the opposjte
plate
of the capacitor. Sjnce ne i
ther
the size
nor
the djstance between
these plates change, the
ony
parameter
I ef t whi ch
determ i
nes the capacity
i
s the type
of
dielectric
matera1,
which
is
the
wellbore
flujds
flowing
between
the
probe
and
cage.
The
unit
of
th i
s
measurement is
termed
the
dielectric
constant of the flud(s) fowing between the
plates .
The d i electric constants for urellbore flujds are:
DI
ELECTRIC CONSTANTS
GAS 1.O
OIL
2.8
T0
3.0
WATER 60 TO
80
P
L
A
T
E
51
8/12/2019 Production Logging- Field Session
52/75
As can be
observed from
the chart, the
capaci tance
tool
j
s
most
sens
j
ti ve to
changes between
o
i I
and
water. A
eapacj tance
survey
actually neasures
the amount
of
hydrocarbons
present
in a
col
umn
of
water.
In
use,
the survey
js
started
in
an
area
above
the
producing
zones and
I
owered s'low1y
down. The
I og
j
s
run downward
to oppose
the djrectjon of
fluid
flow. Usua'l
ly
three
or more
logs
are
run
to
insure repeatability, 0d
to
make.ce ta'in
that
the well
is
produci
ng
under
stabl
e condi
ti
ons.
The
.tool
can be
cal'i
brated
using an
.i
n-