Upload
sarah-ray
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
RISK ASSESSMENT The risk assessment was conducted as per the relevant sections of EPA publication (2011) – Licence Assessment Guidelines The methodology used required identification of the following; – Receptors – Pathways – Emissions Once these are identified, each item is looked at individually and assigned a level of risk based on no controls. An review into existing controls and other data (historical monitoring, precedent, likelihood etc) is conducted and a reviewed risk rating is applied. 3 What is this and how was it done?
Citation preview
PRESENTED BY DATE
CATEGORY C COVER TRIALEMP and Monitoring ProceduresStephanie Salinas 19 March, 2014
1
2
1. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
A plan which details the following information regarding the use of restricted Category C cover material at Taylors Road Landfill;
• A risk assesment
• Operational procedures
• Monitoring Program
What is it?
3
RISK ASSESSMENT
• The risk assessment was conducted as per the relevant sections of EPA publication 1321.2 (2011) – Licence Assessment Guidelines
• The methodology used required identification of the following;
– Receptors
– Pathways
– Emissions• Once these are identified, each item is looked at individually and
assigned a level of risk based on no controls.• An review into existing controls and other data (historical monitoring,
precedent, likelihood etc) is conducted and a reviewed risk rating is applied.
What is this and how was it done?
4
RISK ASSESSMENT
The table in Appendix 5 summarises the Risk Assessment process.
Aspects and Impacts Table
5
OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
• This section of the EMP details the operational methods and controls regarding the use of Category C soil as cover material;
– Restricted contaminants
– No double handling
– Dust mitigation as required
• These controls & procedures are derived from the risk assessment and address the identified risks.
• These operational procedures are what control the level of risk associated with the activity.
What is this and how was it done?
6
MONITORING PROGRAM
• Monitoring data will is used to measure whether the operational procedures are being effective in controlling the identified risks.
• As the predominant risk identified with the Category C cover trial is in relation to airborne dust and contaminants, the monitoring program in this management plan focuses on assessing these risks.
Why is this important?
7
MONITORING PROGRAM
• Daily visual post placement inspections of restricted Cat C cover by SITA staff, prior to close of business.
• VOC monitoring within the PIW cell to be conducted by SITA staff with the use of appropriate equipment.
• Ammonia monitoring within the PIW cell to be conducted by SITA staff with the use of appropriate equipment
• Directional dust monitoring gauges assessed by a third party NATA-accredited laboratory.
• Weather conditions (specifically wind)
What will it consist of? What is being monitored?
8
MONITORING PROGRAM
• 24 hour dust and contaminant monitoring events (including monitoring during non-operational periods)
• Conducted by a third party NATA-accredited consultant and laboratory with use of specialised equipment
• Assesses levels of dust being emitted from the PIW cell over 24 hours (operational & non-operational)
• Considers the impact of the weather conditions (wind, temperature, rain, etc)
• Assesses for contaminants within the restricted Cat C cover range such as metals, as well as for asbestos.
What will it consist of? What is being monitored?
9
AUDITOR REVIEW
• All monitoring results will be provided to the auditor as they are received by SITA during the trail period
• This does not mean any required action will not be taken until auditor review.
• At the conclusion of the trial period, the auditor will provide a report with an assessment on the use of Cat C cover and the results of the trial period.
How is the auditor involved in the process?
10
• an EMP has been developed
• Risk assessments have been conducted to BPEM standards
• Operational procedures have been developed
• Monitoring processes have been defined
• an independent Auditor will review
IN SUMMARY