22
NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008

NECAP 2007: District Results

  • Upload
    marvin

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

NECAP 2007: District Results. Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008. What is NECAP?. Criterion-referenced standardized test State-mandated assessment of core content Reading Mathematics Writing (Grades 5, 8, and 11) Administered to all students Grades 3-8 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: NECAP 2007: District Results

NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and

Evaluation

February 25, 2008

Page 2: NECAP 2007: District Results

What is NECAP?

• Criterion-referenced standardized test

• State-mandated assessment of core content– Reading– Mathematics– Writing (Grades 5, 8, and 11)

• Administered to all students – Grades 3-8– Grade 11 (reported separately)

Page 3: NECAP 2007: District Results

Example:

340

Grade Level Scaled Score

Types of Scores Reported on NECAP• Achievement Levels

– Use to make comparisons about achievement of standards

– Reported in percent of n– Four proficiency levels

• Scaled scores– Use to make comparisons

among students, schools, and districts

– 3-digit number– 40 is the proficient cut score

Level Descriptor

4 Proficient with Distinction

3 Proficient

2 Partially Proficient

1 Substantially below Proficient

Page 4: NECAP 2007: District Results

Reading Results

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

District-wide (Achievement Levels):

• 40% of students scored proficient or higher as compared to 37% in 2006.

• 29% of students scored substantially below proficient in reading in 2007, the same as in 2006.

• A trend demonstrating an increase in percent proficient across a three-year period has emerged.

Page 5: NECAP 2007: District Results

Reading Results

Grade-level (Achievement Levels):

• Percent proficient ranged from 36% (gr. 6) to 43% (gr. 5)

• Percent substantially below proficient ranged from 22% (gr. 5) to 31% (gr. 4, 8)

• Grades 5, 7 & 8:

– Trend - more students proficient

– Trend - fewer students substantially below proficient

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Grade 3-5 Grade 6-8

Page 6: NECAP 2007: District Results

Reading Results

Scaled Scores:

• No grade displays a mean scaled score that attains Proficient (i.e., 40).

• Grades 5, 7, and 8:

– continuous gain in mean scaled sore across three years.

NECAP Reading Mean Scale Score

Grades 6, 7 and 8 - Total Population

323431

343436

38

35 36

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

2005 2006 2007

N-2005 2,005 1,984 1,933 N-2006 1,766 1,933 1,886N-2007 1,697 1,683 1,836

Grade 3-5 Grade 6-8

Page 7: NECAP 2007: District Results

Writing Results

District-wide (Achievement Levels):

• 28% of students scored proficient or higher as compared with 24% in 2006

• 34% of students scored substantially below proficient as compared with 42% in 2006

• Data is inconsistent for the district; trends do not emerge

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 8: NECAP 2007: District Results

Writing Results

Grade-level (Achievement Levels):

• Percent proficient ranged from 20% (gr. 8) to 36% (gr. 5)

• Percent substantially below proficient ranged from 31% (gr. 5) to 37% (gr. 8)

• Trends do not emerge

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 9: NECAP 2007: District Results

Writing Results

Scaled Scores:

• No grade displays a mean scaled score that attains Proficient (i.e., 40).

• Grade 8:

– Trend - continuous one-point gains in mean scaled sore across three years.

NECAP Writing Mean Scale Score

Grades 5 and 8 - Total Population

29

3330

32 31

35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Grade 5 Grade 8

2005 2006 2007

N-2005 1,795 1,886 N-2006 1,766 1,851 N-2007 1,727 1,816

Page 10: NECAP 2007: District Results

Math Results

District-wide (Achievement Levels):

• 28% of students scored proficient or higher as compared with 31% in 2006

• 44% of students scored substantially below proficient as compared with 43% in 2006

• Data is inconsistent for the district; trends do not emerge

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 11: NECAP 2007: District Results

Math Results

Grade Level (Achievement Levels):

• Percent proficient ranged from 25% (gr. 8) to 34% (gr. 5)

• Percent substantially below proficient ranged from 40% (gr. 3) to 48% (gr. 8).

• 2 of 6 grade levels demonstrate some degree of decline in the percent of students substantially below proficient from 2006 to 2007 – grades 7 and 8.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Grade 3-5 Grade 6-8

Page 12: NECAP 2007: District Results

Math Results

Scaled Scores:

• No grade displays a mean scaled score that attains Proficient (i.e., 40).

• 34% of students scored substantially below proficient as compared with 42% in 2006

• Data is inconsistent for most grade levels; however, Grade 8 data reflects a positive trend in mean scaled sore

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Grade 3-5 Grade 6-8

Page 13: NECAP 2007: District Results

NECAP District Reading - Grade Level ComparisonPercent in Each Performance Level

Testing Years Results District and Grades 3, 4 and 5 - Fall 2005 - Fall 2007

3729 29

3528 30

39

2731 32 29

22

34

34 32

33

32 28

30

3533 33

32

34

2734

35

29

38 38

28

34 32 3234

36

3 3 5 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 5 7

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007

11,480 11,066 10,270 1,866 1,909 1,491 1,886 1,801 1,833 1,806 1,771 1,730

District (3-8) Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

N

Page 14: NECAP 2007: District Results

NECAP District Reading - Grade Level ComparisonPercent in Each Performance Level

Testing Years Results Grades 6, 7 and 8 - Fall 2005 - Fall 2007

3228 30

39

2925

42

34 31

38

3234

35

40

34

33

3331

27

37 32

2429

36

23

3133

3 3 4 2 2 51 3 4

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007

2,005 1,766 1,697 1,984 1,933 1,683 1,933 1,886 1,836

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

N

Page 15: NECAP 2007: District Results

NECAP Reading Mean Scale Score

Grades 3, 4 and 5 - Total Population

3335 35

373737

3636

38

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5

2005 2006 2007

N-2005 1,866 1,886 1,806 N-2006 1,909 1,801 1,771N-2007 1,491 1,833 1,730

Page 16: NECAP 2007: District Results

NECAP Reading Mean Scale Score

Grades 6, 7 and 8 - Total Population

323431

343436

38

35 36

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

2005 2006 2007

N-2005 2,005 1,984 1,933 N-2006 1,766 1,933 1,886N-2007 1,697 1,683 1,836

Page 17: NECAP 2007: District Results

NECAP District Writing - Grade Level ComparisonPercent in Each Performance Level

Testing Years Results Fall 2005 - Fall 2007

3642

34 32

41

31

4044

37

35

34

38

31

32

32

3836

43

2620

23

32

22

28

21 18 18

3 4 5 5 5 81 3 2

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007

3,681 3,617 3,543 1,795 1,766 1,724 1,886 1,851 1,816

District (5, 8) Grade 5 Grade 8

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

N

Page 18: NECAP 2007: District Results

NECAP Writing Mean Scale Score

Grades 5 and 8 - Total Population

29

3330

32 31

35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Grade 5 Grade 8

2005 2006 2007

N-2005 1,795 1,886 N-2006 1,766 1,851 N-2007 1,727 1,816

Page 19: NECAP 2007: District Results

NECAP District Mathematics - Grade Level ComparisonPercent in Each Performance Level

Testing Years Results District and Grades 3, 4 and 5 - Fall 2005 - Fall 2007

5243 44 47

3740

49

3843 44

3742

25

2527

30

3030

26

29

3125

26

23

21

2725

21

2827

2330

2427

33 30

3 4 3 26 3 2 2 2 4 4 4

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007

11,698 11,268 10,449 1,902 1,928 1,522 1,928 1,835 1,875 1,846 1,801 1,760

District (3-8) Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

N

Page 20: NECAP 2007: District Results

NECAP District Mathematics - Grade Level ComparisonPercent in Each Performance Level

Testing Years Results Grades 6, 7 and 8 - Fall 2005 - Fall 2007

52

4247

57

49 47

6154

48

26

25

24

23

23 27

19

2128

21

2825

17

25 2217

22 23

15 4 2 3 4 3 3 2

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007

2,048 1,818 1,730 2,019 1,960 1,711 1,955 1,926 1,851

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

N

Page 21: NECAP 2007: District Results

NECAP Mathematics Mean Scale Score

Grades 3, 4 and 5 - Total Population

323234

363435

3234 35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5

2005 2006 2007

N-2005 1,902 1,928 1,846 N-2006 1,928 1,835 1,801N-2007 1,522 1,875 1,760

Page 22: NECAP 2007: District Results

NECAP Mathematics Mean Scale Score

Grades 6, 7 and 8 - Total Population

313130

323334 3333 33

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

2005 2006 2007

N-2005 2,048 2,019 1,955 N-2006 1,818 1,960 1,926N-2007 1,730 1,711 1,851