Upload
orsin
View
58
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Muon news from Upgrades Week - I. GIF++: more coordination of planning needed Among CMS muon systems (shadowing?), in CMS, and LHC-wide CF4 as a greenhouse gas (GWP = 7390, lifetime 50000 yrs) GEMs: define baseline without CF4 (poorer timing) CSC: investigate R&D for eliminating CF4 (CF3I??) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
GIF++: more coordination of planning needed Among CMS muon systems (shadowing?), in CMS, and
LHC-wide CF4 as a greenhouse gas (GWP = 7390, lifetime
50000 yrs) GEMs: define baseline without CF4 (poorer timing) CSC: investigate R&D for eliminating CF4 (CF3I??)
CSCs and L1 trigger latency Tracker front-end hits an important boundary at 12.5 us CSC simulations at 10, 20 us: should repeat at 12.5 us;
then verify; can we live with these results (versus huge replacement program)?
RE3/1, RE4/1: bakelite RPC only need minor improvements Improvement factors only ~ 2 to 4 required No justification for ~100 ps timing given Tracker points
to vertex Need to check that RPC Splitter links (GOL) are
compatible with upgraded L1 Forward Muon Track Finder
Muon news from Upgrades Week - I
1
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
ME-0
ME-1/1
Muon simulation First plot showing ME0 background
rates (well, fluxes) Expected hit rates ~100 kHz/cm2
(10-3 of rate capability) More attention needed for
neutron, photon, charged background rates In order to understand existing
detectors In order to build confidence in
simulation for ME0 particularly Comparisons of data (CSC, RPC,
DT) hit rates to each other Compare data hit rates to FLUKA
and GEANT
Muon news from Upgrades Week - II
2
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
Importance of new muon detectors for L1 trigger not well understood with functional Track Trigger L1 momentum supplied by Tracker Muon system used primarily for
pointing to the Tracker
What needs to be understood: Rate limits for muon-only tracks to
matching? Muon system matching accuracy
needed? How good is TT efficiency at high
eta? Is high-eta TT simulation now stable? Difference between Associative
Memory (AM) versus FPGA designs for TT?
Muon news from Upgrades Week - III
3
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
Challenge from spokesperson on physics of muon upgrade See following slide – need workshop <June but when? Involve Upgrade Performance Studies group, muon
POG, muon DPG, and simulation teams
Muon news from Upgrades Week - IV
4
Some considerations from this week: muons
• We need to beef up the physics case• In the near future we will need to have a clear
view of how to reconcile the apparently parallel threads on the choices/options for muon upgrade description in the TP for Phase 2 and the GE1/1 ‘project’ that will reach “TDR level” by the fall
• We should probably plan for a dedicated workshop on this
April 2, 2014 CMS Upgrade week , T. Camporesi 5
From CB meeting: Tiziano
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
1. Phase 2 TP: next update for reader group Contact group meets Thursdays, next release planned
April 172. Costing: new estimate needed for Management
by April 31 Fabrizio will discuss about that next
3. Dedicated meeting on measured & Phase 2 background rates Week of April 22-25 after AGR? Summarize at GMM of April 28?
4. Workshop on “Physics of the Phase 2 muon upgrade” Hold it before June to motivate the upgrades included in
TP Possibly 2-3 days Seems that April is too soon, look for dates after Fermilab
workshop on upgrade physics, e.g. 12th-14th , starting afternoon of the 12th
Future Meetings
6
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
Backup
7
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
1. Consolidation of existing detectors DT, CSC, RPC To handle 6x more integrated and 5x more
instantaneous luminosity than design To last ~30 years To reduce or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions
2. Completion of the forward region 1.6<h<2.4 Redundancy as originally foreseen 1997 in the muon
TDR Improved high luminosity triggering (lowered
thresholds) New technologies that handle the high rates and
complements the CSC, i.e. thin & simple GEM and iRPC3. Muon tagging for h>2.4
One GEM station within a rebuilt endcap calorimeter Up to as high as 4.0 depending on the calorimetry
Areas of Phase 2 muon interest
8
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
Consolidation – GIF++ muon planning
RPCs High eta
RPCs consolidationRPC gas studies
CSC
GEM
DT
9
NB need additional infrastructure, need for CMS & CERN–wide coordination
Numerous chambers into GIF++ (ME1/1, ME1/2) starting late 2014/early 2015, ~8 months irradiation
Hands-on (–off!) opportunity for young scientists
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
GWPs - Global Warming Potentials http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_refrigerants SF6 is 23900; C2H2F4 is 1100, CF4 is 6500, other fluorocarbons typically ~5000-10000 Fluorocarbons to be ruled out in the EU after 2017
RPC gases Chambers are leaky (500 l/hr), and gas mix C2H2F4 + isoC4H10 + SF6 95/4/0.3% Fluorocarbons have been essential to good operation of RPCs – so a big problem
CF4 for GEMs and CSCs: GEMs typically 30% CF4 for optimal timing, but not essential when in conjunction with
CSC CSC contains ~4% of CF4 for anti-aging, little leakage, closed loop gas system and
recuperation (but not 100%)
Consolidation – gas mixtures
10
CERN can get EU derogation as a scientific institution, but will substantially reduce global warming components. What about gas availability >2017? For GEMs we will define the baseline without
use of CF4 Open question: do we need an anti-aging gas
R&D for CSC? Not anticipated
5→8 ns
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
“Old” CSC cathode front-end boards (CFEB) include switched capacitor arrays with 96 cells x 50 ns. These precious cells are used: Before a “pretrigger” based on
pattern of hits in the 6-layer chambers
After each pretrigger but before L1A, store 8 cells (follow fairly slow front-end signal for low noise / high precision)
Curves on right are simulation of the CSC cathode data loss versus L1A latency and rate. Data loss >2% for >10 msec
Cost and effort to replace CFEBs is enormous: 13.8 MChF and *12* months (AL) full-time use of the crane
Consolidation – L1 trigger latency
10 msec
1 MHz
• Noted this week that Tracker FE limit is 12.5 msec: will Track Trigger electronics (FPGA or AM solutions) push us as high as that value? Hope not…
• What is CSC situation at that latency? Is the data loss random, or not?
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
GEM detectors (proposed for GE1/1, GE2/1, and ME0 Chambers: well-advanced in context of GE1/1 Front-end electronics: VFAT3 needed for CMS
and under design Back-end, DAQ, and trigger electronics R&D:
under development for 40o GE1/1 slice test installed in YETS 2016
Slice test is a natural focus for 2014-2016 R&D Building 904 combined CSC-GE1/1 test stand
is a natural place for tests
New muon detector R&D
12
GE1/1 slice testYETS 2016
VFAT3
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
Need iRPC (Improved RPC) detectors
Modest 2-4 rate capability improvement factor is sufficient, easily within reach Using low-noise ATLAS-developed
electronics Using low-resistivity selection of
existing bakelite panels Straightforward build of RE3/1,
RE4/1 now seems acceptable No clear physics motivation yet
for ~100 ps resolution Glass RPC multigap Link to tracks that point at correct
vertex Would need R&D for fast CMS
electronics Need to check links compatible
with CSC Track Finder upgrade
New muon detectors: RE3/1 and RE4/1
New RPC electronics
13
“P
hase
2 m
uon
upgr
ade”
J
ay H
ause
r
A
pril
2014
New detectors now implemented Reconstruction software
development beginning Physics gains being quantified More attention needed for
neutron and other background rates: Comparisons of data (CSC, RPC, DT)
hit rates versus FLUKA and GEANT L1 trigger situation well
understood for GE1/1 addition to CSC
Trigger less well understood for Phase 2 era with the Track Trigger functional E.g. how good is high-eta efficiency? Is high-eta TT simulation stable? Muon system pointing accuracy
needed?
Muon simulation for Phase 2 upgrade
14
ME-0
ME-1/1