61
Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment

James A. ZagzebskiDepts. of Medical Physics, Radiology,

and Human Oncology

University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

Page 2: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Should we do routine performance testing in ultrasound?

Some say “It is not beneficial.”

Others believe there is not sufficient manpower, especially in physics and bme.

Phantoms are perceived to be expensive and inadequate.

Page 3: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Routine performance testing …

No established performance standards.Geometry, no problem; image quality is!

Lack of correlation between performance parameters and clinical performance.

Imaging is simple; specifying performance is complex.

Page 4: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

ContentsReview characteristics of equipment

Discuss factors related to physicists measurements of imaging performance

Recommend basic QA

Discuss role of medical physicists

Page 5: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 6: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 7: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 8: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 9: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 10: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 11: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 12: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 13: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 14: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 15: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 16: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Real-time imaging

JAZ tongue30 frames/s

Page 17: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Signal Processing

Page 18: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Harmonic Processing

Acousticfield

Afterprocessing

Tran

sduc

er

Tissue

Tran

sduc

er

Tissue

Frequency

Frequency

f1

f2

Page 19: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Gallbladder Polyp

Fundamental Harmonic

Page 20: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Amplify

CodedTransmit

Tx

Amplify

Transmit

Tx

Decode

Coded Excitation

Standard

Page 21: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

GE 548cStandard Transmit

GE 548cCoded Excitation

Page 22: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 23: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 24: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

GE Logiq 700Horizontal spacing: 2 mm, 1 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.25 mmVertical Spacing: 2 mm, 1 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.25 mm

4 MHz12 MHz

Page 25: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 26: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Multiple Transmit Focal Zones

Page 27: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 28: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 29: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

DF.R.L x λ=

F = focal distanceD = aperture (transducer) sizeλ = wavelength

(smaller for higher frequencies)

F = focal distanceD = aperture (transducer) sizeλ = wavelength

(smaller for higher frequencies)

Page 30: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Point targets in tm material

GE C548transducer

4 MHz 7 MHZ

Page 31: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 32: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University
Page 33: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

ConventionalTransducer

4 mm targets

Page 34: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Important Performance Features

Geometric accuracy(Not at levels considered previously when static scanners were used)

Resolution

Uniformity

Penetration and sensitivity

Low contrast detection

Page 35: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Common US phantoms

Page 36: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Gel Phantom Material Properties

FairWater-likeB/A

GoodLiver likeScatter

Good0.5 to 0.7 dB/cm-MHz

Attenuation

Very Good1,540 m/sSOS

Good103 kg/m3Density

Degree of ControlValueProperty

Page 37: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Water-based Gel PhantomsGel materials cannot be machined.

Even little bubbles cause big problems.

Care is needed to avoid desiccation.

Page 38: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Alternative Materials

Polyurethane rubberstable

SOS = 1455 m/s(Too low)

Attenuation changes too rapidly with freq.

QA tests only?(Goodsitt et al, 1998, Med Physics)

Page 39: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Vertical Distance Accuracy Horizontal Distance Accuracy

Page 40: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Prostate Implantphantom

Dots indicate templates forinsertion points.

Targets should align with template.

(Courtesy of CIRS)

Page 41: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Extended Fields

3-D

Page 42: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

3-D “Egg-Phantom”

Page 43: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

5 4 3 2 1 ½mm

21½¼(mm)

Axial Resolution Targets

Page 44: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Cautions Regarding Axial Resolution

Discrete target separationScanner performance may fall between target spacing

Window material causes reverberationsOccasionally see double images of a target

Only limited use of quantitationAxial response length (computer or manually)

Page 45: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Reverberations from Scanning Surface

Page 46: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Lateral Resolution

Page 47: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

2 3 4

Tubes (vessels)

2mm

4mm

Page 48: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

2mm

4mm

Page 49: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

“Standard Phantom”Attempt (ACR)

P CarsonE BooteT JohnsonA SiebertJ ZagzebskiE Madsen

RMI 408A

Page 50: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Spherical Mass

Page 51: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Low Contrast Detection

-1.5 dB -3 dB

Page 52: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Routine QA ProgramEquipment inspection

Penetration into a phantom

Gray scale photography (workstation monitor)

Image uniformity

Distance measurements (where needed) RMI 403

Page 53: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

InspectionTransducers free of cracks, delaminations

Cables in good shape

Transducers cleaned after each use

Viewing monitors clean

Air filters

Wheels, locks

Page 54: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Maximum Depth of Visualization

Page 55: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Photography (gray bar)

Page 56: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

2 3 4

Page 57: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Photography (SMPTE)

Page 58: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Image Uniformity (dead elements)

Page 59: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Role of The Medical Physicist

Page 60: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Be knowledgeable in functionality of ultrasound equipment.

Be aware of issues related to acoustic output levels.

Help establish QA programs.

Work beyond routine QA measurements.

Role of The Medical Physicist

Page 61: Medical Ultrasound Equipment Performance …Performance Testing Of Medical Ultrasound Equipment James A. Zagzebski Depts. of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology University

Mechanical and Thermal Indices(MI and TI)

1992 (US) Acoustic Output Display Std

Removed application specific intensity limits

Contrast agents (MI)

Research mode (NIH)