13
Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005 Dan Goodin, Graham Flint, Ron Petzoldt, Neil Alexander

Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson,Jon Spalding

Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement

HAPL Project MeetingRochester, NY

8-9 November 2005

Dan Goodin, Graham Flint, Ron Petzoldt, Neil Alexander

Page 2: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

We are attempting to demonstrate the “pessimistic” version in-situ target

engagement system proposed by Flint 3/05 (Gen II)

Key Requirements:

•20 m accuracy in (x,y,z)

•1 ms response time

Goals:

Full integration of all key elements of target engagement

Benchtop demo first: identify and solve problems before investment in full-scale, high-performance demonstration

Page 3: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

Glint system: beamlet fine adjustmentto compensate drift

The system consists of Poisson spot detection, Doppler fringe counting, a

simulated driver with steering, and a glint-based alignment

The driver beam is simulated with a HeNe laser

Doppler fringe counting provides z and timing (v)

Poisson spot system measures (x,y)

Page 4: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

Initial Poisson spot results were reported at the previous HAPL

meeting*

We demonstrated Poisson spot detection with 5 µm accuracy in <1 ms using a translation stage and an ex-situ centroiding algorithm

* L. Carlson, M. Tillack, D. Goodin, G. Flint, “R&D Plan for Demonstrating Elements of a Target Engagement System”

Page 5: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

To perform real-time target engagement on the benchtop, we needed a target transport

method

CMOS camera

illumination laser

PSD

4-mm SS sphere

We are using various translation stages and rail systems

We’re still working on a more prototypical surrogate transport method

Page 6: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

Our in-line benchtop centroiding system now runs continuously at <20 ms per

measurement

– this allows us to begin real-time feedback to beam steering

– higher speed will require real-time OS and a faster camera

– 1 cm/s target speed over 1 m travel

– 100 fps Basler camera

– Labview running on Windows XP

Approximate Time (ms)

Image Processing Initialize/setup visualization subvi's 0.5 Acquire image from 100 fps CMOS camera via firewire 6 Search image and match Poisson spot pattern with memory 9 Set coordinate system to center of matched pattern 0.5 Find circular edge of the Poisson spot 0.5 Output centroid coordinates, convert pixels to distance 1

Total 17.5

Breakdown of times

Page 7: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

Integration of Poisson spot detection with a “fast” steering mirror was

implemented

We passed a pseudo driver beam through a 10x beam expander to magnify the range of motion of FSM (±1.5 mm)

Determining the location of the driver on the target is difficult – the accuracy of engagement is confirmed with an offset PSD as a surrogate target

Page 8: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

QuickTime™ and aMPEG-4 Video decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Open loop Poisson spot tracking: The Movie

±3 mm CMOS±1.5 mm PSD

white dot:Poisson spot

yellow dot:PSD

1. At t=0, PSD initialized at (0,0)

2. Start train moving

3. Measure Poisson spot (x,y)

4. Move FSM to follow sphere

5. Measure accuracy using PSD

Page 9: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

Engagement is performed in 23.5 ms, but dynamic errors are too

large

Sources of errors: • rocking of PSD & target• speed limitations in PC hardware/

software • overly simplistic gain curves • FSM quality

Approximate Time (ms)

Image Processing Same steps itemized above 17.5

Read DAQ Channels Read DAQ channels for PSD voltages, 2 convert to distance, graph, display

PID Control Apply PID algorithm to X and Y axies, 2 apply gain, graph, display

Write DAQ Channels Output voltages to FSM controller 2

Total 23.5

Breakdown of timesx-axis comparison of PS and PSD readings

Page 10: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

higher performance will require a better FSM

Beam deflection is nonlinear with drive voltage and exhibits

severe resonant behavior

595 Hz 617 Hz

1 ms

We characterized the Thorlabs piezo cage mirror mount using a signal generator

Page 11: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

Work has begun on Doppler fringe counting

• Restrictions on laser power limit the use of a metal sphere, so we’re using an n=2 sphere and flat mirror

• Single-wavelength (632.8 nm)

• Errors due to translation stage, vibration, air flow

Repeatability demo using micrometer: travel of 5 mm with 10 m increments

An N=2 ball lens is a retroreflector:

Page 12: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

We performed a fast tracking demo at 1000 Hz using a high-speed pellet and post-shot centroid analysis

1000 fps, 10 ms per frame video sequence of surrogate target coming into, then out of the camera’s FOV, at 150 m/s (Photron camera)

Curvature in the target trajectory allows us to avoid a shutter mirror for a range of velocities

Speed of gun is too fast, speed of tracking too slow:

work on the benchtop

Page 13: Mark Tillack, Lane Carlson, Jon Spalding Laboratory Demonstration of In-chamber Target Engagement HAPL Project Meeting Rochester, NY 8-9 November 2005

Next Steps: more integration and more

prototypical

Poisson system:Acquire a faster camera and real-time OS

Doppler system:

Demonstrate counting on metal spheres with longer pathsImplement dual-wavelength counting

Integration of Doppler and Poisson:On-axis demonstration (pseudo-integration)Off-axis demonstration (true integration)

Integration of Poisson and FSM:Improve control of the environment, acquire a high-end

FSM

Glint system Install glint laser and coincidence sensor, align 2 beamlets