Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
a
NOTESFROMTHELOOENEIGHBOURHOODPLANWORKSHOPEVENT12thJULY2016
LooeNeighbourhoodPlanWorkshopJuly2016Page2
LOOENEIGHBOURHOODPLANVISIONINGEVENT12thJULY2016@16.30THEMILLPOOLCENTRE,WESTLOOEINTRODUCTION
TheActingChairoftheLooeNeighbourhoodPlanSteeringGroup,EdwinaHannaford,welcomedtheattendeesandintroducedtheteam,andsetoutthebroadaimsofthemeetingwhichwere:
• Tolookattheresultsfromthelongperiodofwidespreadcommunityengagementthathadrecentlycompleted.
• IdentifythekeyissuesfacingLooethattheNeighbourhoodPlancouldaimtotackle.• DiscussdraftvisionsforthefutureofLooethatisbasedontheseresults.• Spendalittletimelookingathowwewilldotheworktocreatetheplanningpoliciesandproposals
thatwillachievethevision.LOOENEIGHBOURHOODPLANWORKSHOP12
THJULY2016
AGENDA4.00TO4.30PMArrival,sign-in,refreshments
4.30PMWelcomeandintroductionActingChairofLooeNeighbourhoodPlanSteeringGroup,CouncillorEdwinaHannaford.4.40PMSession1–WhatisaNeighbourhoodPlanandwhathavewebeendoing?
SteveBesford-Foster,NeighbourhoodPlanProjectManager4.50PMSession2–FeedbackreportontheLooeCommunitySurvey2016.
SteveBesford-Foster,NeighbourhoodPlanProjectManager5.10PMSession3–Tablediscussion:havingheardthefeedbackfromtheCommunitySurvey,whatarethetop3or4issuesfortheNeighbourhoodPlantodealwith?5.30PMFeedbackfromtablediscussions.
5.45PMBreak–refreshments.
6.00PMSession4–Tablediscussionofa‘futureLooevision’:Thiscouldberecordedintheformofa‘visionstatement’ORasamap/diagramdepictinghowthefuturelayoutofthetownmightbe,orhowitmight‘work’functionally.6.20PMFeedbackfromtablediscussions
6.35PMSession5–ThenextstepsincreatingtheLooeNeighbourhoodPlanActingChairofLooeNeighbourhoodPlanSteeringGroup,CouncillorEdwinaHannaford.6.45PMGeneralQandASession.
7.00PMChair’sSummary.7.05PMSign-uptoWorkingGroups,1-to-1discussions,refreshmentsanddispersal.
7.30PMWorkshopendsMembersoftheSteeringGroupwillassistattheTableDiscussions.Flipchartpaper,mapsandplans,pensandpost-itnotesavailabletorecordideas.
LooeNeighbourhoodPlanWorkshopJuly2016Page3
SESSION1-WHATISANEIGHBOURHOODPLANANDWHATHAVEWEBEENDOING?
TheActingChairsaidthattobegin,andbringeveryoneuptodate,SteveBesford-Foster,theLooeNPProjectManager,wouldgiveashortpresentationonwhatNeighbourhoodPlansare,whytheyareimportantandwhatLooehaddonesofar.TheslidesfromthispresentationaregivenasAppendix1.QuestionsraisedattheendofthissessionconcernedthestatusoftheNeighbourhoodPlan,andwhethertheLocalPlanningAuthoritywouldproperlyrespectitasaplanningtoolwhenmakingdecisionsonplanningapplicationsaffectingLooe.InreplytheprovisionsoftheLocalismAct2011andtheconsequentchangestothePlanningActs,whichmadeNeighbourhoodPlansaformalpartoftheplanningsystem,werereferredto,pointingoutthatifthePlanwassupportedatReferendumtheLocalPlanningauthorityhadnochoicebutto‘make’thePlan.ItwasalsonotedthatlocalmonitoringoftheuseoftheNeighbourhoodPlanwasdesirable,sothatanylackofuseormisinterpretationcouldberaisedasanissuewithCornwallCouncil.
SESSION2-FEEDBACKREPORTONTHELOOECOMMUNITYSURVEY2016
SteveBesford-Fosterthenpresentedarapidsummaryofthesurveyresults,notingthatacopyofthegraphswasoneachtable,andthatfullerdetailswerebeingpostedontheNeighbourhoodPlanwebsite.TheslidesfromthispresentationaregivenasAppendix2.
Heexplainedthat495returnshadbeenreceivedfromadultpopulation(17andabove)of4,321whichgaveaconfidenceintervalof4.15pointsataconfidencelevel95%,meaningthattheresultswereareasonablyfairexpressionoftheviewsofLooe’scommunity.Healsoexplainedhowthesurveyinvolved‘closedquestions’presentedusingaLikertScaleweightingorapercentageofthoserespondingtoaquestion,andalsoopenendedquestions.ItwasalsonotedthattheageprofileoftherespondentsdifferedalittlefromtheactualprofileforLooe,asolderpeopleweremoreinclinedandavailabletorespondtosuchsurveys.ThismeantthattheWorkingGroupswouldneedtoensurethatyoungerpeoplewereengagedwhentheydevelopedideasandsolutionstotheissuesraised.Keypointsarisinginthepresentationwere:
• Itwasnotablethatwhenaskedhowthetownmightbedescribedinthefuture,theharbourasasourceofworkandleisure,thetraditionalfeelandvaluesofthetown,andit’squiettranquilitywereallstronglysupported.
• Theprotectionofthelocalidentity,heritageandthehistoryofLooewasseenasanimportantsustainabilityissue,secondonlytoflooding.
• WhilstalmostallrespondentsidentifiedwithLooe,theyalsoidentifiedwith‘neighbourhoods’withinthetown,suchasBarbicanandHannafore
• AdditionalshoppingfacilitiesandbetterparkingarrangementstoppedthelistofthingsthatwouldmakeLooeabetterplacetolive.
• Ifanynewhousingwastobebuilt,respondentsfeltitshouldbesmallerstarterhomesforyoungpeople,affordablehousinganddwellingsbuilttotakeintoaccountchangingrequirementsthatcomewitholdage.
• TherewasstrongsupportfortheredevelopmentofPolean,withleisure,shoppingandhi-techindustryasthemostpopularuses.
• QuitealotofrespondentsalsowantedtoseeadevelopmentforshopsandjobsonthefieldsoppositetheschoolontheBarbican.
• Astowhatsortofjobsshouldbeprovided,respondentshadfavouredservicejobsintourismandcarerelatedwork,ITandcommunications,andarts/entertainmentasthetop4.
• Onthetowncentre,respondentswereinterestedinpedestrianpriority,beingabletoaccessmoreservices,havingmoreindependenttraders,andachangeinthebalanceofretailtomakeitmoreinteresting.
• Therewasstrongsupportfortheharboursideanditsroleineconomicwell-being.
LooeNeighbourhoodPlanWorkshopJuly2016Page4
SESSION3–TABLEDISCUSSION:HAVINGHEARDTHEFEEDBACKFROMTHECOMMUNITYSURVEY,WHAT
ARETHETOP3OR4ISSUESFORTHENEIGHBOURHOODPLANTODEALWITH?
Afterlisteningtoabriefintroduction,thetablegroupsgotdowntodetaileddiscussionofwhatitallmeant,andwhatthekeyissueswere.Eachtable‘flip-charted’thediscussions,andfedthembacktotheworkshopviaspokesperson,andthesepointsaresummarizedinthetablebelow: SUMMARYOFSESSION3FLIPCHARTNOTESFORMEACHDISCUSSIONTABLE
Housing–lowcost–infill,bylocalbuilders,withlocaldesign–keepcontrolofaffordabilityLowcosthousingSafeEnvironmentasacrosscuttingthemeShoppingneedssupport-Retailoffer–mixtobesupported-Supermarket–whattypeandwhataboutimpactonTownCentre?Supermarket–butwhatimpactonTCandtrafficinfrastructureonTC–butsignificantproportionoftownsfolkwantmodernstandardsofsupermarketshoppingandchoiceGeography–LooehashalfacatchmentPoleanisanassetforthefuture-WorkingHarbour-Keepfishingindustry-Betterjobsforyouthtoretaintheminthecommunity-Poleandevelopment–whattypeandimpactonthetowncentre-Fishingindustry–canwesupporttheprotectionoftheindustryandprmoteitintheNP?EmploymentmustgrowTourism–dependentontraditionandheritageofarea–howcanwegetvisitorsmoreinvolvedintheindustry?Safeguardingtraditionalareasandharbour=‘essentialidentityofLooe’-Identity–cultural/industrialheritageiskeyEnvironmentcrosscuttingissues–flooding,coastaldefencesandinfrastructureCommunitySafetyMOREINFONEEDEDFROMOTHERSURVEYSTOPLAN
CLUESFORTHE‘VISION’
Harbour/Fishing/Beach/Maritimeeconomy/Opportunity/IdentityProsperity/shoppingSelf-supporting/Environment/Futureproof/pollutionfree/ResponsiveTimeless/preserving
SESSION4–TABLEDISCUSSIONOFA‘FUTURELOOEVISION’
Followingashortrefreshmentbreak,thetablediscussionreformed,thistimetodiscusswhatmightbeafuturevisionforLooe.Eachtablegroupwasaskedtorecordthisintheformofa‘visionstatement’orasamap/diagramdepictinghowthefuturelayoutofthetownmightbe,orhowitmight‘work’functionally.Eachtable‘flip-charted’thediscussions,andfedthembacktotheworkshopviaspokesperson,andthesepointsaresummarizedinthetablebelow:
SUMMARYOFSESSION4FLIPCHARTNOTESFORMEACHDISCUSSIONTABLE
‘Acommunitythathasrevitalizeditsmaritimeeconomyintoonethatcanbringprosperitytoallwhilstsignificantlyreducingitsimpactontheenvironment’AVennDiagramshowingfivecircles:1.Unchanged–timeless2.Culture–music–choirs3.Tourism–qualitydestination4.Opportunities–employmentbusiness5.Sustainability–futureproof:‘Live–work–rest–play–live’‘Preserving,respondingandshaping:WeareLooe’
LooeNeighbourhoodPlanWorkshopJuly2016Page5
‘DevelopLooe’scentrallocationasthetourismhubforSECornwall’
SESSION5–THENEXTSTEPSINCREATINGTHELOOENEIGHBOURHOODPLANThefinalsessionoftheeveningwasaplenarydiscussionofwhatthenextstepsshouldbetotaketheNeighbourhoodPlanforward.SlidesusedtoassistthisdiscussionaregivenasAppendix3.Therewasagreementthatthebestwayforwardmaybetoformshort-termworkinggroupsthatwillmeetafewtimesoversaya3-monthperiodtofocusonparticularthemesandworkupproposals.DuringthebreaktheActingChairandtheProjectManagerhadlookedatthefeedbackfromsession3,andproposedthefollowingworkinggroups:
• HousingandEnvironment• Shoppingandaccesstoservices• Economyjobs• Heritageandculture/tourism
Indealingwiththesethemes,eachgroupcouldlookatthecrosscuttingthemes–infrastructure,affordability,safety,geography/environment.Theworkshopfinishedontime,withattendees‘signingup’toassisttheWorkingGroupsastheyleft. DRAFTWORKING‘VISION’FORLOOENEIGHBOURHOODPLAN
AtthesubsequentLooeNeighbourhoodPlanSteeringGroupMeeting(11thAugust2016)thefollowingstatementwasadoptedasaninterimvisionpendingreviewfollowingtheworkinggroupactivityandreports:
Itwasalsoagreedthatastraplineshouldbeaddedtothisforpromotionalpurposes:
‘Preserving,respondingandshaping:weareLooe’
ATTENDANCE
NAME ORGANISATIONEdwinaHannaford LooeTownCouncil
ArmandToms LooeTownCouncil
AnneFrith LooeTownCouncil
SteveBesford-Foster PlanSupport–ProjectManager
AlisonFoulkes ParishChurch
AndrewLightfoot RiversideUnitedChurch
ChrisRoy U3A
DianeTrerise L.I.S.
‘Acommunitythathasrevitaliseditsmaritimeandcoastalbasedeconomyintoonethatbringsprosperitytoallandsignificantlyreducesitsimpactontheenvironment,whilstmaintainingitsspecialcharacter’
LooeNeighbourhoodPlanWorkshopJuly2016Page6
EdmundWilson LooeStrategyGroup
EdithColes SECTA
GregSpence SECTA
HeatherGarden LooeValleyU3A
JoyHiggs LooeValleyU3A
JustinSpreckley LooeDevelopmentTrust
JamesLundy
KateWhittington LooeValleyU3A
KathyLang LooeHarbourCommissionersMarkAllen OldBridgeSurgery
MarkCamp LooeTICMikeJackman LooeSailingGroup
MarkJoce LooeMusicFestival
PatMoore Lanteglos-by-FoweyPC
PaulWhitehouse U3APeterKing LOCS
TanyaBrittan LooeMusicFestival
VivieneWoodgate U3A
WORKINGGROUPSIGNUP(includingsign-upssubsequenttotheevent)
(notetheitalicizednamesaresuggestedrepresentativesfromtheSteeringGroup.*indicatespossiblelead.)
1. Economy NAME ORGANISATION EMAIL/TELNOMark Joce Looe Music Festival Joy Higgs Looe Valley U3A Viviene Woodgate U3A Diane Trerise L.I.S. John Martin Gwen Challoner Kathy Lang *Justin Spreckley Kate Jackman *Edmund Wilson Edwina Hannaford Armand Toms
2.HousingandEnvironment
NAME ORGANISATION EMAIL/TELNORoss Fisher Edwina Hannaford Armand Toms *James Lundy Laura Tansley David Gamblin (Research)
LooeNeighbourhoodPlanWorkshopJuly2016Page7
3.Shoppingandaccesstoservices
NAME ORGANISATION EMAIL/TELNOChris Roy U3A Jill Fleming Paul Penhaligan Sheila Brock *Mike Jackman Looe Sailing Group Armand Toms *Susannah Gill *Andrew Gill Mark Allen
4.Culture/heritage/tourism
NAME ORGANISATION EMAIL/TELNOPaul Whitehouse U3A Bob Fleming Tanya Brittan Looe Music Festival Edith Coles SECTA Greg Spence SECTA P Myles *Ross Fisher LOCS Chair LOCS Mark Camp
LooeNeighbourhoodPlanWorkshopJuly2016Page8
APPENDIX 1 – Slides for Session 1
Sess
ion
1 –
Wha
t is
a N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n an
d w
hat
have
we
been
doi
ng?
•Anew
wayofh
elpinglocalcom
mun
itiesto
influ
enceth
ede
velopm
ento
fthe
areainwhich
theylive.
•Introdu
cedthroughtheLocalismAct201
1-ane
w
legalpow
erfo
rlocalpeo
pletom
akealand
-use
Planfo
rthe
irne
ighb
ourhoo
d.
•InCo
rnwall,the‘QualifyingBod
y’to
dothisisthe
ParishorTo
wnCo
uncil.
4
Typ
es o
f N
eig
hb
ou
rho
od
Pla
n
•Neighbo
urho
od(D
evelop
men
t)Plans
ØStatutoryDe
velopm
entP
lanthatfo
rmsp
arto
fthe
LocalD
evelop
men
tFramew
ork.
•Neighbo
urho
odDevelop
men
tOrders.
ØGrant‘automatic’plann
ingpe
rmissionforcertain
kind
sofd
evelop
men
twith
insp
ecified
area
•Com
mun
ityRightto
BuildOrders
ØGrante
xplicitplanningpermissionford
evelop
men
tsche
mes
5
Wh
ere
do
th
ey f
it i
n t
he
syst
em?
6
NAT
IONAL
PLA
NNINGPOLICY
FR
AMEW
ORK
Th
eGo
vernment’splann
ingpo
licyforE
ngland
isse
toutinth
eNationalPlann
ingPo
licyFram
ework(NPP
F).Thefocuso
fthis
policyistoensurethatdevelop
mentisc
arrie
dou
tinawayth
at
makesapositiveco
ntrib
utiontoourlivesb
utalso
leavesalasting
legacyfo
rourch
ildren.
CORN
WAL
LLO
CALPLAN
Co
rnwallCou
ncilho
ldsrespo
nsibilityfo
rsettin
gplanning
policyinth
eCo
rnwallLocalPlananddeterm
iningmost
planningapp
lications.A
Neighbo
urho
odPlanmustb
ein
compliancewith
boththestrategicp
oliciesse
toutinth
eNP
PFand
thepo
licieso
ftheCornw
allLocalPlan.
NEIGH
BOURH
OODPLAN
Neighbo
urho
odPlanareledbylocalcou
ncilsand
willenable
localresidentsand
businessestohaveagreatersa
yinth
eplanningand
develop
mento
ftheirTown.
Neighbo
urho
odPlansinNum
bers
7
Status
Num
ber
Applications
1852
Desig
natio
ns16
51
Subm
itted
toLP
A30
3
Exam
inations
208
Made
124
Asat2
9/3/16
The
Pro
cess
Five
mai
n st
ages
:1.
Agr
eein
g th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
2.Pr
epar
ing
the
Plan
3.In
depe
nden
t ch
eck
4.Com
mun
ity R
efer
endu
m5.
Mak
ing
the
Plan
8
9
Desig
natio
nof
Neighbo
urho
od
Area
Initialsc
opingof
them
esInitialCom
mun
ity
Engagement
Worksho
ps&
continuing
Commun
ity
Engagement
Form
Steering
Grou
p
Identifyissuesa
nd
aims
Developevidence
base
Developpo
licies&
prop
osals
Publish
Neighbo
urho
od
Plan
Statutory
Consultatio
n(6weeks)
Subm
ittoLP
A
Independ
entE
xamination
Mod
ificatio
ns
Referend
um
Planis‘M
ade’inlaw
Neighbo
urho
odPlanbecomes
partofstatutoryDevelop
ment
Plan
Creatin
gthePlan
Commun
ity
Engagemen
tAp
provingthe
Plan
InitialCom
mun
ity
Consultatio
n
Commun
ity
Mem
bershipof
Steerin
gGrou
p
Good
Neighbo
urho
odPlanshavean
explicit
andlogical'golden
thread
’
Co
mm
un
ity
Eng
agem
ent
E
vid
ence
Bas
e
Aim
s an
d O
bje
ctiv
es
Pol
icie
s an
d P
rop
osal
s
Imp
lem
enta
tion
10
Imp
orta
nt
limit
s.
§Neighbo
urho
odPlansca
n’tcoverth
ingsth
atca
nnotbe
obtained
throughland
-usepolicies(e.g.th
efre
quen
cyof
buses,streetcleansin
g,graffiticontrol,po
stboxprovisio
n,
commun
itygroup
activity
)§Bu
tthe
ycanbe
listed
assep
arateprojectsinase
parate
section
§An
dmaybe‘influ
enced’byde
sign(e.g.develop
erprovisio
nofbus-bays,spaceforcom
mun
ityhub
setc)
11
Imp
ort
ant
lim
its
•Neighbo
urho
odPlansca
n’treverseore
xten
dde
signationsm
ade
byotherprocesses,eg:
•Con
servationAreas
•SSSI
•Spe
cialAreasofC
onservation
•Butca
ninclud
eplanningpolicesto
beused
insid
esomeofth
ese
areas.
•Neighbo
urho
odPlansca
n’tinclude
:•M
ineralsa
ndW
aste
•NationallySignificantInfrastructureProject
12
Imp
ort
ant
lim
its
Mu
st fol
low
som
e ‘B
asic
Con
ditio
ns’:
•Hav
e ‘a
ppro
pria
te r
egar
d’ t
o na
tiona
l pol
icy
(suc
h as
the
Nat
iona
l Pla
nnin
g Po
licy
Fram
ewor
k)•B
e in
‘gen
eral
co
nfo
rmit
y’ w
ith
str
ateg
icel
emen
ts
of t
he
Loca
l Pla
n
(eg
hous
ing
and
empl
oym
ent
targ
ets
and
site
allo
catio
ns)
•Be
com
patib
le w
ith E
U o
blig
atio
ns (
chan
ges
on t
he
way
!)•C
ontr
ibu
te t
owar
d s
ust
ain
able
dev
elo
pm
ent
13
The
Ben
efit
s
•V
ery
loca
l pla
nnin
g po
licie
s gi
ven
stat
us in
law
•G
ives
a lo
cal s
lant
to
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent
•Pl
anni
ng A
utho
rity
mu
st u
se t
hem
•Bui
ld c
omm
unity
cons
ensu
s ar
ound
a p
ositiv
e vi
sion
for
th
e ne
xt t
en,
fifte
en,
twen
ty y
ears
•
Gen
erat
e ne
w p
roje
cts
and
idea
s, a
nd g
ives
the
m t
he
land
-use
sup
port
nee
ded
to d
eliv
er t
hem
•C
reat
e ne
w p
artn
ersh
ips
to g
et t
hing
s do
ne
•M
otiv
ates
mor
e pe
ople
to
beco
me
invo
lved
in c
omm
unity
activi
ty•
Hel
ps p
eopl
e m
ake
sens
e of
why
thi
ngs
are
the
way
the
y ar
e, a
nd h
ow t
o ch
ange
the
m:
redu
ces
cyni
cism
Thecommun
itylegacyca
nbe
asimpo
rtan
tasthe
conten
tofthe
Plan
.14
Imp
ort
ant
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
•Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
can
add
to S
trat
egic
pol
icy
•Can
‘alte
r’ d
etai
led
Loca
l Pla
n el
emen
ts•C
an m
ake
plan
ning
pol
icie
s de
sign
ed for
wid
er a
reas
m
ore
resp
onsi
ve t
o lo
cal c
ondi
tions
.•C
an a
dd p
olic
ies
for
deal
ing
with
dev
elop
men
t in
de
sign
ated
are
as (
e.g.
des
ign
crite
ria
in c
onse
rvat
ion
area
s)•C
an g
ive
a lo
cal
dim
ensi
on t
o th
e ‘p
resu
mp
tio
n
in f
avou
r of
su
stai
nab
le d
evel
opm
ent’
15
•Fo
cus
on s
up
po
rtin
g s
ust
ain
able
dev
elo
pm
ent
that
m
eets
the
nee
ds o
f th
e pe
ople
who
live
, w
ork
in a
nd v
isit
a to
wn
•Bri
ng a
lo
cal
dim
ensi
on
to
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent,
av
oidi
ng u
nsym
path
etic
nat
iona
l pre
scri
ptio
ns
•BU
T w
hat
is S
usta
inab
le D
evel
opm
ent?
16
Wh
y is
hav
ing
a N
eig
hb
ou
rho
od
Pla
n
imp
ort
ant?
Mak
ing
su
re w
e g
row
an
d d
evel
op i
n a
way
th
at
mee
ts o
ur
nee
ds,
is
safe
, an
d f
air
for
futu
re
gen
erat
ion
s.•
Livi
ng
wit
hin
th
e p
lan
et’s
en
viro
nm
enta
l li
mit
s –
by
prot
ecting
and
enh
anci
ng t
he n
atur
al a
nd m
an-m
ade
envi
ronm
ent,
and
res
pond
ing
to c
limat
e ch
ange
.
•E
nsu
rin
g a
str
on
g,
hea
lth
y an
d j
ust
so
ciet
y –
by
mee
ting
pre
sent
and
fut
ure
need
s fo
r th
e ho
usin
g, w
ork
and
serv
ices
tha
t su
ppor
t th
e w
ellb
eing
of
all t
he c
omm
unity.
•A
chie
vin
g a
su
sta
ina
ble
eco
no
my
–by
sup
port
ing
action
s th
at b
uild
pro
sper
ity
for
all a
nd u
se r
esou
rces
wis
ely.
•P
rom
oti
ng
go
od
go
vern
an
ce –
by e
nsur
ing
that
eve
ryon
e is
invo
lved
in c
reat
ing
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan.
•Bu
t w
hat
doe
s th
at m
ean
loc
ally
?17
SUSTAINAB
LEDEV
ELOPM
ENT
Wh
at c
an b
e in
clu
ded
?
En
viro
nm
ent
•D
esig
n gu
idan
ce &
pol
icie
s•
Prot
ectio
n of
Loc
al G
reen
Spa
ce•
Sm
all s
cale
ren
ewab
le e
nerg
y•
Impr
ovin
g bi
odiv
ersi
ty•
Con
trol
of
adve
rtis
emen
ts•
Prot
ectio
n of
tra
ditio
nal s
hop
fron
ts
Eco
no
my
•Allo
cation
of
empl
oym
ent
land
•D
evel
opm
ent
of w
orks
hops
•To
wn
cent
re o
r vi
llage
re
gene
ration
•En
cour
agem
ent
of ‘h
ome
wor
king
’
18
Wh
at c
an b
e in
clu
ded
?
Hou
sin
g•A
lloca
tion
of n
ew h
ousi
ng
land
•Mix
and
des
ign
•Car
par
king
sta
ndar
ds•M
eetin
g lo
cal h
ousi
ng
need
•Affor
dabl
e ho
usin
g •‘
Sel
f-bu
ild’ s
ites
•pro
pert
ies
Com
mu
nit
y Fa
cili
ties
•Pr
otec
tion
of a
llotm
ents
•Cyc
le &
ped
estr
ian
links
•Pr
otec
tion
of lo
cal s
hops
an
d pu
bs•
New
com
mun
ity f
acili
ties
•D
evel
oper
con
trib
utio
ns t
o im
prov
emen
t of
com
mun
ity
faci
litie
s
19
Wh
at c
an b
e in
clu
ded
?
Thro
ug
h a
n N
DO
:•
PD for
rep
lace
men
t w
indo
ws
that
acc
ord
with
spe
cific
de
sign
gui
danc
e in
Con
s Are
as•
PD for
C o
f U
of:
•gr
ound
flo
ors
of s
hops
and
of
fices
to
cafe
s in
a t
ouri
sm
dom
inat
ed t
own
squa
re•
desi
gnat
ed la
nd in
the
pub
lic
high
way
for
sea
ted
cons
umpt
ion
of foo
d an
d be
vera
ges
•up
per
floor
s ab
ove
shop
s an
d of
fices
to
crea
te r
esid
entia
l fla
ts•
Repl
acem
ent
ofsh
op
fron
tsfo
llow
ing
desi
gn g
uide
Thro
ug
h a
Com
mu
nit
y R
igh
t to
B
uild
Ord
er•
A vi
llage
co
mm
unity
hub
an
d sh
op•
An
affo
rdab
le h
ousi
ng
deve
lopm
ent
•Vill
age
wor
ksho
ps•
Use
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith t
he
Com
mun
ity R
ight
to
Bid
or
the
Com
mun
ity R
ight
to
Cha
lleng
e as
par
t of
a w
ider
pr
opos
al
20
2.
Pre
par
ing
th
e P
lan
Loca
l Cou
ncil
then
pre
pare
the
Pla
n
Nat
iona
l Pla
nnin
g Pr
actic
e G
uida
nce:
A q
ualif
ying
bod
y sh
ould
be
incl
usi
ve a
nd
op
en in
the
pr
epar
atio
n of
its
Nei
ghbo
urho
od p
lan
… a
nd e
nsur
e th
at t
he
wid
er c
omm
unity
:•
is k
ept
fully
info
rmed
•ab
le t
o m
ake
thei
r vi
ews
kno
wn
•
has
oppo
rtun
ities
to
be a
ctiv
ely
invo
lved
•
is m
ade
awar
e of
how
the
ir v
iew
s ha
ve in
form
ed t
he
draf
t ne
ighb
ourh
ood
plan
.
21
2.
Pre
par
ing
th
e P
lan
-Ev
iden
ce
Nee
ds a
sou
nd e
vid
ence
ba
se:
•D
emog
raph
ic –
who
live
s he
re?
curr
ent
and
tren
ds
•Soc
io-e
cono
mic
–w
ho w
orks
? w
here
? &
at
wha
t?
•En
viro
nmen
tal i
ssue
s –
flood
ing,
air q
ualit
y,
sust
aina
bilit
y•
Des
igna
tions
-he
rita
ge,
land
scap
e, w
ildlif
e •
Tran
spor
t –
serv
ices
, ca
paci
ty,
usag
e •
Infr
astr
uctu
re –
capa
city
, fit
ness
for
pur
pose
, ne
ed
•H
ousi
ng s
tock
-ty
pe,
tenu
re,
cond
ition
, ne
ed
•La
nd u
ses
–po
tent
ial d
evel
opm
ent
site
s •
Exis
ting/
emer
ging
pla
nnin
g po
licie
s –
Cor
nwal
l Loc
al
Plan
, N
PPF
etc
22
2.
Pre
par
ing
th
e P
lan
•Cor
e Ste
erin
g G
roup
•W
orki
ng G
roup
s to
tac
kle
spec
ific
issu
es•E
ngag
ew
ith c
omm
unity
, in
fras
truc
ture
bo
dies
dur
ing
proc
ess
•Dra
w u
p Pl
an a
nd c
onsu
lt th
e co
mm
unity
•Am
end
and
subm
it to
Cor
nwal
l Cou
ncil
23
3.
Ind
epen
den
t C
hec
k
•C
ornw
all C
ouni
lche
cks
the
plan
mee
ts r
egul
ator
y re
quir
emen
ts
•Sub
mits
the
Plan
to
an i
nd
epen
den
t A
sses
sor
who
: ü
Che
cks
that
it m
eets
the
bas
ic c
ondi
tions
: ü
Con
form
ity w
ith E
U a
nd U
K la
w
üCon
form
ity w
ith t
he N
PPF
and
loca
l pol
icy
üCon
trib
utes
to
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent
•U
sual
ly b
y W
ritt
en R
epre
sent
atio
ns b
ut m
ay b
e a
hear
ing
if Ass
esso
r fe
els
it n
eces
sary
.
24
4.
Co
mm
un
ity
Ref
eren
du
m
•LP
A c
onsi
ders
Exa
min
er’s
Rec
omm
enda
tion
s an
d if
satisf
ied
basi
c co
nditio
ns &
EU
& h
uman
rig
hts
requ
irem
ents
met
a r
efer
endu
m m
ust
be h
eld
•N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
nnin
g (R
efer
endu
ms)
Reg
ulat
ions
201
3 co
ver
orga
nisi
ng &
con
duct
ing
the
poll:
•O
ne y
es/n
o qu
estio
n"D
o yo
u w
ant
Anyc
ityCou
ncil
to u
se
the
neig
hbou
rhoo
d pl
an for
Any
tow
nto
hel
p it
deci
de
plan
ning
app
licat
ions
in t
he n
eigh
bour
hood
are
a?"
•Li
mit
on ‘r
efer
endu
m c
ampa
ign’
exp
endi
ture
(det
erm
ined
by
pop
ulat
ion)
•Pu
blic
ity m
ater
ial c
orre
ctly
att
ribu
ted
•‘P
urda
h’ p
erio
d on
Cou
ncil
•N
o fly
post
ing,
def
amat
ory
info
rmat
ion,
or
offe
nce
to p
ublic
or
der
25
Co
mm
un
ity
Ref
eren
du
m
•Cor
nwal
l Cou
ncil
arra
nge
loca
l ref
eren
dum
•O
ne y
es/n
o qu
estio
n:
•"D
o yo
u w
ant
Cor
nwal
l Cou
ncil
to u
se t
he
neig
hbou
rhoo
d pl
an for
XXXX
to h
elp
it de
cide
pl
anni
ng a
pplic
atio
ns in
the
nei
ghbo
urho
od a
rea?
”•
No
min
imum
tur
n ou
t
•Pl
ans
with
mor
e th
an 5
0% Y
ES v
ote
are
‘mad
e’
•Th
e 50
% is
of th
ose
who
are
on
the
elec
tora
l rol
l and
vot
e on
the
day
–no
t th
ose
who
live
or
wor
k in
the
are
a
•M
ay in
clud
e el
ecto
rs fro
m a
djoi
ning
par
ish
if th
ey a
re
sign
ifica
ntly
impa
cted
by
the
Plan
26
Mak
ing
th
e P
lan
IfPlan
earnsam
ajority
voteitisfo
rmally‘M
ade’-no
t‘ad
opted’–the
LocalPlann
ingAu
thority
and
theQua
lifyingBod
yha
snochoice!
•Neighbo
urho
odPlansarelegallyre
cognize
dasparto
fthe
Develop
men
tPlan
•The
Neighbo
urho
odPlanmustb
etakenintoaccou
ntwhe
nplanning
applicationsaredetermined
with
thesameweighta
sthe
LocalPlan.
Then
itsu
ptoth
ecommun
ityand
thelocalcou
nciltose
ethatth
eirLocalPlann
ingAu
thority
useth
eNPprop
erly!
•Makereferencetoitsp
oliciesinrespon
seto
consutations
•Plantodeliveraspectslocally
•Useinpre-app
disc
ussio
ns27
Nex
t……
Ap
ply
ing
th
e P
lan
•M
onitor
ing
use
by t
he L
ocal
Pla
nnin
g Aut
hori
ty
•Bri
ngin
g fo
rwar
d pr
opos
als
•City
/Dis
tric
t/Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
or o
ther
bod
ies
•In
vest
ors
and
Dev
elop
ers
•In
terv
entio
ns b
y lo
cal C
ounc
il
•See
king
and
usi
ng C
omm
unity
Infr
astr
uctu
re L
evy
•Rev
iew
and
upd
ate
in li
ght
of c
hang
ing
circ
umst
ance
s….
28
Wo
rk s
o f
ar…
•Set
up
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Cor
e Ste
erin
g G
roup
-
Sep
tem
ber
2013
•Pub
licity
and
pre
sent
atio
ns t
o lo
cal o
rgan
isat
ions
(18)
-
Oct
ober
201
3 to
May
201
4•C
omm
unity
Sur
vey
–Fe
brua
ry t
o M
arch
201
5•P
roje
ct M
anag
er a
ppoi
nted
•L
ocal
ity G
rant
obt
aine
d•D
etai
led
Hou
seho
ld,
Bus
ines
s an
d Yo
uth
Sur
veys
Spr
ing/
Sum
mer
201
6•V
isio
ning
wor
ksho
p Ju
ly 2
016
•Wor
king
gro
ups
star
t w
ork…
29
DO
YO
U W
AN
T TO
GET
MO
RE
INV
OLV
ED?
•Ke
ep u
p-to
-dat
e vi
a th
e w
eb-s
ite,
post
ers,
Tw
itter
, an
d th
e pr
ess
and
radi
o.
•Ta
lk a
bout
the
Pla
n w
ith f
rien
ds a
nd n
eigh
bour
s–
spre
ad t
he
wor
d!•
Con
trib
ute
your
idea
s an
d su
gges
tions
thr
ough
com
men
ts f
orm
s or
write
to
the
Tow
n Cou
ncil.
•Com
men
t on
the
dra
ft p
lan
befo
re it
goe
s of
f fo
r in
spec
tion
and
we
all v
ote
on it
.•
Volu
ntee
r pr
actic
al h
elp
to c
reat
e th
e Pl
an,
from
not
e-ta
king
to
phot
ocop
ying
, do
ing
surv
eys
and
deliv
erin
g le
afle
ts,
and
supp
ortin
g ex
hibi
tions
.
•Jo
in t
he
Ste
erin
g G
rou
p o
r a
Wor
kin
g G
rou
p t
hat
foc
use
s on
a p
arti
cula
r to
pic
to
hel
p d
evel
op o
pti
ons
for
the
futu
re.
30
LooeNeighbourhoodPlanWorkshopJuly2016Page9
APPENDIX 2 – Slides for Session 2
LO
OE
CO
MM
UN
ITY
S
UR
VE
Y A
NA
LYS
IS
July
201
6
Stat
isti
cal S
igni
fican
ce
•49
5 re
turn
s fr
om a
dult
popu
latio
n (1
7 an
d ab
ove)
of 4
,321
.
•89
% c
ompl
etio
n ra
te o
vera
ll
•C
onfid
ence
inte
rval
of 4
.15
poin
ts a
t a
conf
iden
ce le
vel 9
5%(If
you
use
a c
onfid
ence
inte
rval
of 4
and
a c
onfid
ence
leve
l of 9
5% a
nd 4
7%
perc
ent o
f sam
ple
pick
s an
ans
wer
you
can
be
"sur
e" th
at if
you
had
ask
ed t
he
ques
tion
of t
he e
ntir
e re
leva
nt p
opul
atio
n be
twee
n 43
% (4
7-4)
and
51%
(47+
4)
wou
ld h
ave
pick
ed t
hat
answ
er).
Clo
sed
Que
stio
ns
•Li
kert
Sca
le w
eigh
ted
aver
ages
1 =
Lea
st L
ike
or Im
port
ance
5
= M
ost
Like
or
Impo
rtan
ce o
r As
a %
age
of th
ose
resp
ondi
ng t
o qu
estio
n
Ope
n en
ded
ques
tion
s
•N
umbe
r of
‘men
tions
’ as
a %
age
of m
entio
ns fr
om t
hose
re
spon
ding
to
ques
tion
or a
s a
%ag
e of
all
resp
onde
nts.
1.94
2.402.
52
2.53
2.85
3.36
3.53
3.79
3.79
4.09
4.51
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
CO
MM
UT
ER C
ENT
RE
MO
DER
N
RET
IREM
ENT
D
EST
INA
TIO
N
EXC
LUSI
VE
&
ASP
IRA
TIO
NA
L
VIB
RA
NT
& E
XC
ITIN
G
AFF
OR
DA
BLE
TR
AN
QU
IL &
QU
IET
TO
UR
ISM
D
EST
INA
TIO
N
LEIS
UR
E H
AR
BO
UR
TR
AD
ITIO
NA
L
WO
RK
ING
HA
RB
OU
R
Q 1
. H
ow w
ould
you
like
Loo
e to
be
desc
ribe
d in
th
e fu
ture
?48
8 R
espo
nden
ts
2.93
3.30
3.333.413.46
3.50
3.53
3.57
3.603.703.78
3.81
3.85
3.853.90
3.91
3.934.00
4.044.134.184.
514.614.70
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
MO
RE
ALL
OT
ME
NT
SM
OR
E N
EIG
HB
OU
RH
OO
D S
HO
PP
ING
SIT
ES
FOR
AD
DIT
ION
AL
SCH
OO
LS A
ND
CH
ILD
CA
RE
MO
RE
GR
EE
N E
NE
RG
Y P
RO
DU
CT
ION
A M
OR
E B
ALA
NC
ED
VA
RIE
TY
OF
HO
USI
NG
MO
RE
LO
W IM
PA
CT
‘GR
EE
N’ T
OU
RIS
M D
EV
ELO
PM
ENT
A F
AR
ME
RS
MA
RK
ET
MO
RE
FO
RM
AL
LEIS
UR
E F
AC
ILIT
IES
(E.G
. PLA
YIN
G F
IELD
S, …
DE
FER
RIN
G T
HIN
GS
NO
W T
O P
RO
TE
CT
TH
E IN
TE
RES
TS …
MO
RE
LA
ND
FO
R IN
FOR
MA
L R
EC
RE
AT
ION
(E.G
. PA
RK
S …M
OR
E U
SE O
F R
EC
YC
LED
MA
TE
RIA
LSB
ET
TE
R E
NE
RG
Y E
FFIC
IEN
CY
BE
TT
ER
AC
CE
SS A
ND
FA
CIL
ITIE
S FO
R P
EO
PLE
WIT
H …
FAIR
LY M
EE
TIN
G C
OM
MU
NIT
Y N
EE
DS
WIT
HO
UT
RE
GA
RD
…B
ET
TE
R A
CIL
ITIE
S A
ND
SE
RV
ICE
S FO
R Y
OU
NG
PE
OP
LEM
OR
E O
PP
OR
TU
NIT
IES
FOR
SM
ALL
BU
SIN
ESS
ES
SIT
ES
FOR
AD
DIT
ION
AL
ME
DIC
AL
AN
D C
AR
E F
AC
ILIT
IES
MO
RE
USE
OF
LOC
AL
MA
TE
RIA
LSA
BE
TT
ER
MIX
OF
JOB
S O
PP
OR
TU
NIT
IES
GR
EA
TE
R IN
VE
STM
EN
T IN
RO
AD
AN
D T
RA
NSP
OR
T …
EN
CO
UR
AG
ING
CO
MM
UN
ITY
AN
D B
USI
NE
SS R
EC
YC
LIN
GP
RO
TE
CT
ION
OF
LOC
AL
GR
EE
N S
PA
CE
SP
RO
TE
CT
ION
OF
LOC
AL
IDE
NT
ITY
, HE
RIT
AG
E A
ND
TH
E …
DE
SIG
NIN
G T
O A
VO
ID IS
SUE
S SU
CH
AS
FLO
OD
ING
, …
Q 2
. Wit
h su
stai
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t in
min
d, w
hat d
o yo
u th
ink
are
the
mos
t im
port
ant b
enef
its t
he
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
shou
ld b
ring
to L
ooe?
48
2 Re
spon
dent
s
2%4%5%7%11%14
%16%
16%
17%
26%30
%33%
33%
56%
76%81
%
91%
93%
18%
10%
19%
5%
16%
33%
6%
57%
13%
49%
23%
11%
44%
14%
4%
10%
3%3%
26%
25%
66%
43%19
%
21%
22%
6%
33%
9%
21%
33%
9%
8%
2%
3%
2%0%
23%
46%
1%
26%
45%
13%
46%
14%
10%
1%
13%
1%
2%19%
3%
2%
2%
1
30%
15%9%
18%
9%
20%
10%7%
26%
15%13%
23%
11%
3%
14%
5%
2%
3%
Furn
iture
etc
Offi
ce s
uppl
ies
and
com
pute
rs
Hos
pita
l App
ts
Clo
thes
sho
ppin
g
Elec
tric
al g
oods
sho
ppin
g
DIY
& h
ardw
are
Book
s &
Gift
s
Wee
kly
food
sho
ppin
g
Furt
her
Educ
atio
n
Den
tistr
y
Adu
lt ed
ucat
ion
Opt
icia
ns/h
eari
ng a
ids
Mot
or V
ehic
le F
uel
Bank
s, B
uild
ing
Soci
etie
s et
c
Plac
e of
Wor
ship
Top
-up
or d
aily
food
sho
ppin
g
Che
mis
ts
GP
Serv
ices
Q 3
. Fir
st P
refe
renc
es L
ocat
ions
for
Shop
ping
and
Ser
vice
s
Looe
Lisk
eard
Plym
outh
Inte
rnet
Else
whe
re
455
Resp
onde
nts
65.7
%
34.3
%
Q4.
Do
you
cons
ider
that
you
bel
ong
to a
dis
tinc
t ‘n
eigh
bour
hood
’ in
Looe
?
Yes
No
446
Res
pond
ents
44.8
%
49.3
%
3.8%
2.1%
W L
OO
E
E L
OO
E
LOO
E
OO
A
Q 5
. Wha
t is
the
usua
l nam
e fo
r yo
ur n
eigh
bour
hood
?
Q 5
. Wha
t is
the
usua
l nam
e fo
r yo
ur n
eigh
bour
hood
?
289
Res
pond
ents
Q 6
. Wha
t add
itio
nal l
ocal
faci
litie
s wou
ld yo
u sa
y w
ould
m
ake
your
nei
ghbo
urho
od a
bet
ter
plac
e to
live
?
356
Res
pond
ents
Q 6
. Qua
lific
atio
ns u
sed
for
loca
l fa
cilit
ies…
Q 7
-W
HA
T S
ING
LE
CH
AN
GE
W
OU
LD
MO
ST
IM
PR
OV
E Y
OU
R
QU
AL
ITY
OF
LIF
E A
S A
RE
SID
EN
T
OF
LO
OE
?
•Q
6.do
cx37
9 R
espo
nden
ts
1.681.
82
2.232.312.
472.582.652.
842.94
2.963.
063.243.31
3.59
3.613.
71
3.733.
99
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
MO
BIL
E H
OM
E SI
TES
EXEC
UT
IVE
HO
MES
AC
CO
MM
OD
AT
ION
FO
R T
OU
RIS
TS
BA
RN
CO
NV
ERSI
ON
S
CO
NV
ERT
ING
HO
USE
S A
ND
OT
HER
BU
ILD
ING
S …
NEW
FLA
TS
AN
D A
PA
RT
MEN
TS
DW
ELLI
NG
S W
HIC
H C
OM
BIN
E LI
VIN
G S
PA
CE
AN
D …
SELF
-BU
ILD
& S
ELF-
FIN
ISH
SC
HEM
ES
SHA
RED
OW
NER
SHIP
HO
USI
NG
SOC
IAL
HO
USI
NG
REN
TA
L A
CC
OM
MO
DA
TIO
N
LOC
AL
CO
MM
UN
ITY
OW
NED
DEV
ELO
PM
ENT
S
SUP
PO
RT
ED (E
XT
RA
CA
RE)
LIV
ING
UN
ITS
FOR
…
SMA
LLER
HO
MES
FO
R O
LDER
MEM
BER
S O
F T
HE …
FAM
ILY
HO
MES
DW
ELLI
NG
S B
UIL
T T
O T
AK
E IN
TO
AC
CO
UN
T …
AFF
OR
DA
BLE
HO
USI
NG
SMA
LLER
ST
AR
TER
HO
MES
FO
R Y
OU
NG
PEO
PLE
Q 8
. Wha
t kin
d of
hou
sing
shou
ld b
e bu
ilt in
the
next
15
year
s?44
9 R
espo
nden
ts
Q 9
. Do
you
thin
k th
e P
olea
nsi
te a
t the
end
of t
he M
illpo
olca
r pa
rk b
y Je
wso
nssh
ould
be
rede
velo
ped?
Ye
s
No
445
Res
pond
ents
2.362.
432.52
2.87
3.44
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
Res
iden
tial
Ext
ra c
are/
Ass
iste
d liv
ing
Off
ice/
hi-t
ech
cam
pus
deve
lopm
ents
A s
hopp
ing
cent
re a
nd
para
de
Leis
ure
faci
litie
s
Q10
. Wha
t typ
es o
f red
evel
opm
ent s
houl
d be
pro
vide
d on
th
e P
olea
nsi
te?
432
Res
pond
ents
Q 1
1. C
an y
ou id
enti
fy a
ny o
ther
are
as th
at sh
ould
be
dev
elop
ed?
190
Res
pond
ents
2.862.
963.013.
19
3.213.
30
3.333.
49
3.52
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
Fin
an
cia
l an
d b
usi
ne
ss s
erv
ice
s
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Ma
nu
fact
urin
g -
low
tech
no
log
y
Pu
blic
ad
min
istr
atio
n a
nd
ed
uca
tion
Ma
nu
fact
urin
g -
Hig
h te
ch,
pro
fess
ion
al a
nd
sci
en
tific
Art
s a
nd
en
tert
ain
me
nt
Info
rma
tion
an
d c
om
mu
nic
atio
ns
Se
rvic
e jo
bs
(ca
re w
ork
, cle
an
ing
&
ma
inte
na
nce
, etc
)
Se
rvic
e jo
bs
(re
tail,
re
sta
ura
nts
, ba
r w
ork
, to
uris
m e
tc)
Q 1
2. W
hat t
ype
of jo
bs d
o yo
u th
ink
shou
ld b
e en
cour
aged
gen
eral
ly?
441
Res
pond
ents
1.61
1.962.
09
2.492.58
2.592.652.
75
2.772.
872.983.
123.203.
30
3.34
3.37
3.653.733.
83
3.854.
01
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Mor
e fa
st-f
ood
and
take
-aw
ays
Mor
e pu
bs &
bar
sM
ore
café
s &
res
taur
ants
Res
iden
tial
flats
Ano
ther
sup
erm
arke
tM
ore
‘Hig
h S
tree
t N
ame’
sho
psE
lect
ric
Veh
icle
Cha
rgin
g po
ints
Few
er p
ubs
& b
ars
Off
ices
for
loca
l pro
fess
iona
l se
rvic
esF
ewer
caf
és &
res
taur
ants
Enc
oura
ge r
edev
elop
men
t an
d ad
ditio
nal …
Few
er f
ast-
food
and
tak
e-aw
ays
Sec
ure
cycl
e ra
cks
Less
veh
icul
ar a
cces
s?K
eep
it as
it is
?V
ehic
le b
ans
in to
wn
cent
re d
urin
g pe
ak …
Ope
n sp
ace
and
com
mun
ity f
acili
ties
Impr
oved
ped
estr
ian
rout
es l
inki
ng t
o th
e …
Mor
e In
depe
nden
t tr
ader
Sho
psA
cces
s to
ban
ks, b
uild
ing
soci
etie
s, e
stat
e, …
Impr
ovem
ents
to
mak
e th
e pe
dest
rian
…
Q13
. How
do
you
thin
k th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n sh
ould
dea
l wit
h th
e Tow
n C
entr
e?45
2 R
espo
nden
ts
Q 1
4. D
o yo
u th
ink
the
‘Eve
ning
Eco
nom
y’ o
f Loo
e sh
ould
be
mor
e de
velo
ped?
Ple
ase
tick
one
box.
Ye
s
No
413
Res
pond
ents
3.133.
23
3.68
3.95
4.51
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Pu
bs
& B
ars
A li
ve m
usi
c ve
nu
e
Re
gu
lar
eve
nin
g e
ven
ts
Re
sta
ura
nts
&
Ca
fes
Sa
fe
en
viro
nm
en
t
Q15
. Wha
t wou
ld b
e m
ost
likel
y to
att
ract
you
to L
ooe
in t
he e
veni
ng?
431
Res
pond
ents
2.33
3.36
3.924.
17
4.54
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Mo
re to
uris
m fa
cilit
ies
such
as
café
s,
rest
au
ran
ts a
nd
gift
sh
op
s
Ke
ep
it a
s it
is?
En
cou
rag
e e
nvi
ron
me
nta
l im
pro
vem
en
ts,
ad
diti
on
al w
alk
ing
rou
tes,
op
en
sp
ace
, and
co
mm
un
ity fa
cilit
ies?
Mo
re fa
cilit
ies
to s
up
po
rt m
arin
e/r
ive
r le
isu
re a
ctiv
itie
s
Me
asu
res
wh
ich
he
lp r
eta
in a
nd
su
pp
ort
fis
hin
g fl
ee
t
Q16
. How
do
you
thin
k th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n sh
ould
de
al w
ith
Looe
Har
bour
side
?45
4 R
espo
nden
ts
Q17
. Are
ther
e an
y ar
eas w
here
you
thi
nk a
ctio
n is
ne
eded
to
impr
ove
the
envi
ronm
ent (
e.g.
neg
lect
ed
land
and
bui
ldin
gs, p
oor
stre
et-s
cene
?)
Ye
s
No
401
Res
pond
ents
IF Y
ES
, PL
EA
SE
SA
Y W
HE
RE
:
•Q
uest
ion
18
IF Y
ES
, PL
EA
SE
SA
Y W
HA
T
TH
E P
RO
BL
EM
S A
RE
:
•Q
uest
ion
18
3.85
3.74
3.6
53
.70
3.7
53
.80
3.8
53
.90
Sm
all
sca
le r
ura
l w
ork
sho
ps
Allo
win
g b
arn
co
nve
rsio
ns
an
d
reu
se o
f su
itab
le
red
un
da
nt b
uild
ing
s fo
r h
om
es
an
d jo
b
cre
atio
n
Q20
. Whi
ch o
f the
follo
win
g do
you
thi
nk m
ight
bes
t hel
p lo
cal r
ural
are
as to
thriv
e?42
7 R
espo
nden
ts
0.2%
1.2%
7.0%
45.2
%
31.8
%
14.6
%14
.5%
6.7%
12.7
%
38.2
%
15.1
%
12.9
%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0
%
15.0
%
20.0
%
25.0
%
30.0
%
35.0
%
40.0
%
45.0
%
50.0
%
16 a
nd u
nder
17 –
2425
–40
41 –
6465
–75
76+
Age
Dis
trib
utio
n of
Res
pond
ents
Res
pons
e Pe
rcen
tA
ctua
l Dis
trib
iutio
n
431
Res
pond
ents
23
.2%
14
.3%
19
.1%
43
.4%
0%
5%
10
%
15
%
20
%
25
%
30
%
35
%
40
%
45
%
50
%
Up
to
5 y
ea
rs6
–1
0 y
ea
rs1
1-2
0 y
ea
rs2
1 y
ea
rs +
Q32
. How
long
hav
e yo
u liv
ed in
Loo
e?
LooeNeighbourhoodPlanWorkshopJuly2016Page10
APPENDIX 3 – Slides for Session 5
Sess
ion
5 -T
he n
ext s
teps
in c
reat
ing
the
Looe
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
SuggestedWorkingGroup
s•E
cono
my(in
cludingharbo
ur/Poleande
velopm
ent)
•Hou
sing
•Sho
ppingan
daccessto
service
s•C
ulture/herita
ge/tou
rism
•Meetbetw
eennowandOctober,workingtoabrief,toreviewthe
evidenceandworkupproposalsandpoliciestogointhe
NeighbourhoodPlan
32
Res
ourc
es:
Ou
tsid
eHel
p
33
Resourceneeds
CornwallCou
ncil
•Free,butworkingwith200+localcouncils
•Mappingetc–initialfreethenatcost
Consultants
•Cancoverplanning/designexpertiseorassistwithproject
management
•Buyone-offitemsoragreea‘bespokepackage’:Alwaysseekquotes,
useform
alorderingprocedures
•Localitycapof£500pd
Printin
g,m
aterialsetc
•Seekquotesinitially,whenyouhaveareliablesourcestickwithit!
Map
s,surveyse
tc•U
sewebresourcese.g.ParishOnlineGIS,SurveyMonkey
34
Resourceneeds
•Mapping-ParishOnline,CConlineGISM
apping
•Surveys–SurveyMonkeyorsim
ilar
•InternalComms–email,Dropbox,GoogleDrive,WeTransfer,Texting,
Messengeretc
•ExternalComms–website(WordPress),Facebook(Page,orForum),
Twitter(Hootsuite),Pintrest.
•Presentation–YouTubevideo,Wordle,Tawe,etc
•Generalsoftware–sticktoM
SW
ord,PowePointandExcelastheyae
mostcommoninuse.
35
Resourceneeds
•VolunteerstoserveontheW
orkingGroups
•A‘Convenor’andanotetakerforeach
•Training
•Meetingplaces
•Asmallbudget–say£250eachgroup
•Consumables–paper,flipcharts,post-itnotes,pens,printingetcetc
Trainingfo
rtheworkinggroup
s
•Session1–Toolsandm
odels:useofSWOT,PESTLE,stakeholder
analysis,programmem
anagement,evidenceresearching,GIS
mappingetc.
•Session2–Policies,proposalsandprojects:generatingaim
s,
objectivesandactions,planningpolicywriting,etc
•Session3–1hourforselectedvolunteersonusingParishOnline.
