Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Years 2015-2019 – Level 1
(Formally known as LCIP)
Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) UKRAINE
EUROCONTROL
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine Released Issue
DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET
LSSIP for Ukraine
Infocentre Reference: 15/01/12-41
Document Identifier Edition: Year 2014
LSSIP Year 2014Ukraine Edition Date: 15/06/15
LSSIP Focal Point - RuslanHutsan E-mail:
UkSATSE
LSSIP Contact Person – Ana Paula Frangolho E-mail: ana-paula. [email protected]
Unit DPS/PEPR
Status Intended for
Working Draft General Public
Draft Agency Stakeholders
Proposed Issue Restricted Audience
Released Issue
Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)
Path: Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Ukraine (UA) - APF\Year 2014\Released\LSSIP_2015_UA_Released.doc
LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
1 LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material
2 ESSIP Plan Edition 2013 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr
3 ESSIP Report 2012 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr
4 STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor
5 Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries
6 European ATM Master Plan https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/
7 LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
8 National AIP http://www.aisukraine.net
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine Released Issue
APPROVAL SHEET
The following authorities have approved all parts of LSSIP Years 2015-2019 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan. – Edition 2014.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine Released Issue
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1
Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4
Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Geographical Scope ................................................................................................................ 5
1.1.1 International Membership ......................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2 Geographical description of the UIR/FIR(s) .............................................................................. 5 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ................................................................................. 7 1.2 National Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 8
1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2 UkSATSE ................................................................................................................................ 10 1.2.3 Airports .................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.4 Military Authorities ................................................................................................................... 15 1.3 Air navigation services ........................................................................................................... 17
1.3.1 Current Situation ..................................................................................................................... 17 1.3.2 Air Traffic Flows above FL 275 ............................................................................................... 19 1.3.3 The conflict zones ................................................................................................................... 22 1.3.4 Safety Case ............................................................................................................................. 23
Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity ............................................................................................................ 26 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Ukraine ................................................................................................. 26 2.2 DNIPROPETROVSK ACC ..................................................................................................... 27
2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 27 2.2.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 27 2.2.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 – Summer ................................................................................... 27 2.3 KYIV ACC .............................................................................................................................. 30
2.3.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 30 2.3.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 30 2.3.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer ................................................................................... 30 2.4 LVIV ACC ............................................................................................................................... 33
2.4.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 33 2.4.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 33 2.4.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer ................................................................................... 34 2.5 ODESA ACC .......................................................................................................................... 35
2.5.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 35 2.5.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 36 2.5.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer ................................................................................... 36
Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations ........................................................................................ 39
Chapter 4 - National Projects ................................................................................................................. 41
Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination ....................................................................................................... 45 5.1 Cooperation ........................................................................................................................... 45 5.1.2. Common Aviation Area Agreement ......................................................................................... 45 5.1.3. Cooperation in the area of Satellite Based Augmentation Systems – EGNOS Extension in
Ukraine ............................................................................................................................................... 45 5.2 Regional cooperation ............................................................................................................. 47
5.2.1 MoC between DHMI and UkSATSE ....................................................................................... 47 5.2.2 UkSATSE- MoldATSA, UkSATSE - ROMATSA ..................................................................... 48
Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ....................................................................................... 49
ANNEXES
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 1 Released Issue
Executive Summary
National ATM Context
Due to the current situation in the Eastern part of Ukraine and Autonomous Republic of Crimea (ARC), there was an urgent need to introduce changes/reconfigurations (see Fig 4 and 5) of the Ukrainian air traffic management (ATM) system and to the air navigation services (ANS) provided by UkSATSE. Those ATM/ANS changes concerned both the Ukrainian national airspace and the airspace over the High Seas, where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements (hereinafter - airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine).
Ukraine in collaboration with EUROCONTROL developed the draft “Safety Case regarding provision of air navigation services within Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements” (hereafter - Safety Case) in response to the necessity to make changes in air navigation services provision by Ukrainian State Air Traffic Services Enterprise (hereinafter referred to as UkSATSE) within Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for air traffic services (ATS) provision is delegated to Ukraine by regional air navigation agreement approved by ICAO Council.
In order to minimize the effect of the identified hazards Ukraine is going to use a staged/phased approach to determine the airspace available for planning of civil aircraft flights over the High Seas (see Fig 12 for Phase Ia).The risk assessment procedure shows that the identified risks are acceptable.
Finally, the document contains the main conclusion that UkSATSE does not have any technical and procedural problems for service provision in the airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine.
Traffic and Capacity
Traffic in the Ukraine decreased by 44.4% during summer 2014 (May to October inclusive), when compared to summer 2013.
ESSIP Objective Implementation
There are plans for completion of the following objectives, due for:
● 2015 - AOP03, ATC16, FCM01, ITY-FMTP ITY,-SPI, SAF10, SRC-RLMK, SRC-SLRD.
● 2016 - AOM19, AOP05, ATC12, COM09, COM10, FCM03, ITY-COTR, NAV10.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 2 Released Issue
LSSIP 2014 - Ukraine
*FOC Date █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)
State-related ESSIP Objectives
<=
2008
20
09
2010
20
11
2012
20
13
2014
20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
2020
20
21
AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling
[IDP] [E] *
AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management [IDP] [E] *
AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace [IDP] [E] *
AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions [IDP] *
ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 [E] *
ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 [E] *
ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 [E] *
ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 [E] *
ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools [E] *
ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring [E] *
ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations
[IDP] [E] *
ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 *
ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer
[IDP] [E] *
COM09 Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP)
[IDP] *
COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS *
COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM *
FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services [E] *
FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning [IDP] [E] *
FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 [IDP] [E]
FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [IDP] [E] *
INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) *ITY-ACID Aircraft identification
ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information [E]
ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 [IDP] [E]
ITY-AGVCS2 Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195
ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes [E]
ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP] * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV [E] *
NAV10 Implement APV procedures [IDP] [E] *
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 3 Released Issue
LSSIP 2014 - Ukraine
*FOC Date █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)
SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements *
SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions *
SRC-RLMK Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs) *
SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies *
Airport-related ESSIP Objectives
<=
2008
20
09
2010
20
11
2012
20
13
2014
20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
2020
20
21
UKBB-Kiev
AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1
[E] *
AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 *
AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP] [E] *
ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements
[IDP] *
ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports *
Understanding the Table
Objective Completed No Plan
Objective Partly Completed Missing Data
Objective Planned Not Applicable (Ukraine does not participate in this obj.)
Late
E= Essential – Master Plan Reference IDP = Interim Deployment Programme
NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 4 Released Issue
Introduction
The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium termimplementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. TheLSSIP document – Year 2014 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2014.
The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter.
Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;
Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;
Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter;
Chapter 5deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned;
Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.
Note:Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.
Note:The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 5 Released Issue
Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment
1.1 Geographical Scope
1.1.1 International Membership
Ukraine is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:
Organisation Since
ECAC 15.12.1999
EUROCONTROL 01.05.2004
European Union No
EASA No *
ICAO 09.09.1992
NATO No
ITU
*1. Cooperation on the basis of Working Arrangements in the framework of the transition of the Joint Aviation Authorities and on collection and exchange of information on the safety of aircraft using community airports and airports of the relevant country (done at Brussels on 07 March 2007).
2. Working Arrangement between the SAAU and EASA (done at Paris 2009).
1.1.2 Geographical description of the UIR/FIR(s)
The geographical scope of this document addresses Kyiv UIR and Kyiv, Simferopol’, Dnipropetrovs’k, Odesa, L’viv FIRs.
The Ukrainian ATS Airspace is surrounded by 11FIRs of 9 different States namely, Minsk FIR (Republic of Belarus), Moscow FIR and Rostov–na-Don FIR (Russian Federation), Ankara FIR and Istanbul FIR (Republic of Turkey), SofiaFIR (Rebuplic of Bulgaria), Bucuresti FIR (Romania), Chisinau FIR (Republic of Moldova), Budapest FIR (Hungary), Bratislava FIR (Slovak Republic) and Warszawa FIR (Poland).
The Division Flight Level (DFL) separating upper from lower ATS airspace is FL 275.
Upper Information Region covers the whole Ukrainian ATS Airspace with vertical limits from FL 275 to UNL (fig 1).
The lateral boundaries of 5 existing FIRs of Ukraine are retained in the published boundaries in accordance with International Agreements and current edition of ICAO European Air Navigation Plan (ICAO Doc 7754) with vertical limits from ground to FL 275.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 6 Released Issue
Fig.1Upper Information Region
Fig.2 The lateral boundaries of 5 existing FIRs of Ukraine
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 7 Released Issue
1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation
The current classification of the airspace in Ukraine is shown in the following picture (fig 3):
Fig.3 Airspace classification Note: * Airspace is unclassified. ** If flights are carried out as GAT, then airspace is classified according to the surrounding ATS airspace classification, otherwise airspace is unclassified. The Airspace of Ukraine and Airspace over the high seas where the Air Traffic Services are provided by Ukraine consists of the following structural elements:
1 Upper Flight Information Region (Kyiv UIR); 5 Flight Information Regions (Dnipropetrovs’k FIR, Kyiv FIR, L’viv FIR, Odesa FIR and
Simferopol’ FIR); 6 UTAs; 6 CTAs; 19 TMAs; 20 Control Zones (CTRs) ; 4 Aerodrome Flight Information Zones (AFIZs); Aerodrome Traffic Zones (ATZs) – usually set up for each touchdown pad; 117 ATS routes and routes set up for crossing the state border of Ukraine; 35 Prohibited Areas; 223 Restricted Areas; 78 Danger Areas; 223 Training Areas, 64 of them are stated as temporary airspace reservation; Special rules zone airspace – set up along the state border.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 8 Released Issue
1.2 National Stakeholders
The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Ukraine are the following: - Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine - Ministry of Defence of Ukraine - The Regulator, the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU); - The ATM Service Provider, UkSATSE.
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the following diagram:
1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)
1.2.1.1 General information
The SAAU was created in accordance with Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 of 06.04.2011 -“Creation of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine” and its activity is regulated by the Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”. The SAAU is a separate and independent regulatory body. Activity of the SAAU is controlled and directed by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine through the Minister of Infrastructure of Ukraine.
The SAAU is institutionally separated from the Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE).
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 9 Released Issue
The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The SAAU is further detailed in the following sections.
Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible
Legal Basis
Rule-making MoI, SAAU “Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI dated19/05/2011 , Decree of the President of Ukraine N581/2011 dated 15/05/2011 "The Statute of Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine", Decrees of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine” and № 401 dated 29.03.2002 “Regulation on Utilisation of Airspace of Ukraine”
The aviation related regulatory acts are developed by the SAAU and approved at the level of MoI.
Safety Oversight SAAU Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”,
Order of MoTC "Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" № 320 dated 31/05/2010
Manual of Integrated management System of UkSATSE” approved by UkSATSE and agreed by SAAU on 25.12.2012.
Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements
SAAU “The Rules for Air Navigation Service Providers Certification’ approved by Order of the Ministry of Transport and Communications of Ukraine №42 dated 22/01/2007
Airspace SAAU “Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI dated19/05/2011, Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 401 dated 29.03.2002 “Regulation on Airspace Utilisation of Ukraine”.
Economic MoI Decree of the President of Ukraine № 581/2011 dated 15/05/2011 "The Statute of Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine".
Environment SAAU Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”
Security SAAU Low of Ukraine N545-IV dated 20/02/2003 "The State Security Programme in sphere of Civil Aviation",
Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”
Accident investigation The National Bureau of Air Accidents Investigation of Ukraine
“Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI dated 19/05/2011, Decree of Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 228 dated 21 March 2012 “The Statute of the National Bureau of Air Accidents Investigation of Ukraine”.
Although Single European Sky (SES) is not applicable to Ukraine (see also Chapter 2), ANSP certification is carried out in accordance with “The Rules for Air Navigation Service Providers Certification” approved by the order of the MoT № 42 dated 22/01/2007 (with amendments for requirements to ANSPs that provide MET services (order of MoI N575 dated on 28.11.2011) that was developed in line with the EC Regulation 1035/2011.
Website of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine (MoTC): http://www.mtu.gov.ua (in Ukrainian language).
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 10 Released Issue
Website ofState Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU): www.avia.gov.ua (in Ukrainian, Russian languages).
Website of Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise of Ukraine (UkSATSE): http://www.uksatse.ua/ (in Ukrainian, Russian and English languages).
1.2.1.2 State Aviation Administration of Ukraine
The Regulatory Body in the field of Civil Aviation in Ukraine is the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU), established by the Decree of the President of Ukraine No 398/2011 dated 06/04/2011. The activity of SAAU in sphere of Civil Aviation is regulated by the Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014.
It is a separate and independent regulatory body. It is institutionally separated from the ANSP.
The SAAU is composed of civil representatives only, but appropriate Military Authorities (MoD) are involved in the airspace planning process in accordance with the "Regulation on Airspace Utilisation of Ukraine". The SAAU is responsible for the provision of effective functioning of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System of Ukraine.
Annual Report published: Y The SAAU Annual Safety Report for 2014 was published in April 2015.
SAAU structure - Annex B (1).
1.2.2 UkSATSE
Name of the ANSP: Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise of Ukraine (UkSATSE)
Governance: State Enterprise Ownership: Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine
Services provided Y/N Comment
ATC en-route Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 24.12.2014 ref. AA №015106according to national legislation
ATC approach Y See comment above.
ATC Aerodrome(s) Y See comments above.
AIS Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 24.12.2014according to national legislation.
CNS Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 24.12.2014according to national legislation.
MET Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE on 24.12.2014for en-route/flight region meteorological service. Meteorological service at airports is provided by the State Hydro - meteorologicalService of Ministry of Emergency Situations.
ATCO training Y Training and Certification Centre of UkSATSE provides:initial training; unit training; continuation training (conversion training, training for unusual circumstances and emergencies, refresher training, language training); development training.
Others Y Flight Calibration Service.
Additional information:
Provision of services in other State(s):
Y 1. Part of the airspace of the Black Sea for which the provision of ATS is delegated to Ukraine according to international agreements. 2. In order to facilitate Approach Control Services for Uzhhorod Airport located close to the State Border, Air traffic services are delegated to Uzhhorod APP within part of airspace (Prohibited Area) of the Slovak Republic.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 11 Released Issue
Annual Report published: Y Ukrainian State Air Traffic Services Enterprise Annual Report 2013 (published in March 2014)
UkSATSE structure - Annex B (2).
1.2.2.1 ATC system in use
Location Supplier and Product
Scope Type Put in Ops
Systems and procedures for air traffic services, in particular flight data processing systems, surveillance data processing systems and human-machine interface systems
Lviv Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Kseniya”
ACC, APP, TWR 2001
Lviv, (replacement)
Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Roksolana”
ACC, APP, TWR MAR2015
Odesa Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Anastasiya-II”
ACC, APP, TWR 2003
Odesa, (replacement)
INDRA, Spain, “AIRCON 2100”
ACC, APP, TWR DEC2015
Kiev SELEX, Italy, “Strela – Alenia”
ACC, APP & TWR FEB2012
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 12 Released Issue
Kiev ALES, Chez Republic, “Letvis”
ACC, APP (Back-Up) OCT2012
Dnipropetrovs’k INDRA, Spain, “AIRCON 2000”
ACC, APP, TWR 2008
Dnipropetrovs’k, (upgrading to provide back-up facilities)
INDRA, Spain, “AIRCON 2100”
ACC, APP, TWR FEB 2014
Kharkiv INDRA, Spain, “AIRCON 2100”
APP, TWR AUG2013
Zaporizhzhya Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Irina”
TWR 2006
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 13 Released Issue
1.2.2.2 ATC units of UkSATSE
The following table lists the ACCs and APPs (with associated FIRs) in the Ukrainian ATS airspace, including the airspace where the provision of ATS is delegated to Ukraine.
ATC Unit Number of sectors
Associated FIR(s) Remarks
En-route
TMA
Kyiv ACC 7 5 UKBV Kyiv FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within Kyiv FIR
Odesa ACC 5 2 UKOV Odesa FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within Odesa FIR
L’viv ACC 4 1 UKLV L’viv FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within L’viv FIR
Dnipropetrovs’k ACC 6 1 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within south-west of Dnipropetrovs’k FIR, from FL265 to UNL north and south-east part of Dnipropetrovs’k FIR from FL265 to UNL
Kharkiv APP 3 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR ATC + FIS service: GND-FL265
within TMA
Ivano-Frankivs’k APP+TWR
1 UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service
Uzhhorod APP+TWR 1 UKLV L’viv FIR APP+PAR+TWR service
Zaporizhzhia APP+TWR
1 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
Chernivtsi TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service
Dnipropetrovs’k TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service
Kharkiv TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service
KryvyiRih TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
Kyiv/Boryspil’ TWR X UKBV Kyiv FIR TWR service
Kyiv/Zhuliany TWR X UKBV Kyiv FIR TWR service
L’viv TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR TWR service
Kherson X UKOV Odesa FIR TWR service
Mykolaiv TWR X UKOV Odesa FIR APP+TWR service
Odesa TWR X UKOV Odesa FIR TWR service
Rivne TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service
Vinnytsia/Gavrishivka TWR
X UKBV Kyiv FIR APP+TWR service
Kirovohrad TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
Poltava TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
Sumy TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 14 Released Issue
1.2.2.3 Air traffic control service
4 ACCs (Kyiv, L’viv, Odesa and Dnipropetrovs’k) provide area and approach control services, flight information and alerting services within CTAs. 4APPs (Kharkiv, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Zaporizhzhia and Uzhhorod) provide approach control service within TMAs. 18 TWRs provide aerodrome control service in civil aerodromes Chernivtsi, Dnipropetrovs’k, Uzhhorod, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Kharkiv, Kirovograd, Kryvyi Rih, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Kyiv (Zhuliany), L’viv, Poltava, Kherson, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Rivne, Sumy, Vinnytsia and Zaporizhzhia and within its CTRs.
1.2.2.4 Flight Information service
Flight information sectors of ACCs/APPs provide flight information service within FIRs. Flight information service (FIS) is provided:
within controlled airspace (class C, D) – by ATC units (ACCs/APPs/TWRs); outside controlled airspace (class G, GND-1500 AMSL) - by 6 flight information sectors which are
in 4 ACCs (Kyiv – 2 sectors, L’viv – 2 sectors, Odesa – 1 sector, Dnipropetrovs’k – 1 sector) and by 1 sector situated in Kharkiv APP .
1.2.2.5 Aerodrome flight information service
4 AFIS units provide flight information service in AFIS aerodromes: Zhytomyr (Ozerne), Ternopil’, Kaniv (Pekari) and Cherkasy.
1.2.2.6 Alerting Service
All ATS units are responsible to provide alerting service within its area of responsibility according to Ukrainian legislation. ACCs serve as the central point for collecting all information relevant to a state of emergency of an aircraft operating within the flight information region or control area concerned and for forwarding such information to appropriate regional Search and Rescue Co-ordination Centers of the Ministry of Emergencies of Ukraine that are situated in each ACC. In case of emergency in civil aerodromes concerned TWR informs appropriate service set up within the framework of the search and rescue units and other services and units specified in the related coordination instructions. To collect and share ATS messages, there are:
11 Air Traffic Service Reporting Offices (AROs) at airports: Chernivtsi, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Kirovograd, Kryvyi Rih, Poltava, Mykolaiv, Rivne, Sumy, Uzhhorod, Vinnytsia and Zaporizhzhia;
6 AROs, which belong to briefing offices: Dnipropetrovs’k, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Kyiv (Zhuliany), L’viv, Odesa, and Kharkiv.
1.2.3 Airports
1.2.3.1 General information
The airport network in Ukraine comprises 28 certified aerodromes of which 19 have international checkpoints.
Kyiv Boryspil International Airport, the only airport covered in this LSSIP edition, is the main international airport in Ukraine and accounts for over 45% of all IFR operations at Ukrainian airports/aerodromes.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 15 Released Issue
Aerodromes Odesa, Kyiv Zhuliany, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovs’k, and L’viv are strategic. Other aerodromes are domestic. In accordance with international standards, the service zone of strategic aerodromes is within 200-250km.
The airport covered in this LSSIP is Kiev Boryspil International Airport.
1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP
APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, AOP, ITY-ADQ and SAF11 and INF07.
In addition to the Annex B of the ESSIP Plan edition 2014, it is up to the individual State to decide which
additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives.
The airport covered in this LSSIP is Kiev Boryspil International Airport.
1.2.4 Military Authorities
The Military Authorities (the Ministry of Defence) in Ukraine are composed of:
- The General Staff; - The Armed Forces (Air Force, Ground Force and Naval).
The main responsibilities of the Air Force are:
- Air defence of airspace of Ukraine; - Monitoring of airspace usage; - Air Traffic Control within unclassified airspace (Within a special OAT route system (corridors),
TSA, TRA, R, D-zone, CTR and TMA of military aerodromes).
Air traffic control to OAT is ensured by a network of controlling military units that are responsible for providing services to OAT, planning and co-ordination the use of airspace with respective bodies of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System of Ukraine.
The controlling military units are a part of a common combat system of operation of the Armed Forces.
The controlling military units are provided OAT services in accordance with specific rules and procedures.
They report to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
1.2.4.1 Regulatory role
Regulatory framework and rule-making
OAT GAT
OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?
Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?
N/A
Level of such legal provision: Ministerial Decree, Air Force Regulation
Level of such legal provision :N/A
Authority signing such legal provision: Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force
Authority signing such legal provision :N/A
These provisions cover: These provisions cover:
Rules of the Air for OAT Y
Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A
OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination N/A
ATCO Training Y ATCO Training N/A
ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing N/A
ANSP Certification N/A ANSP Certification N/A
ANSP Supervision N/A ANSP Supervision N/A
Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N/A
Aircrew Licensing Y
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 16 Released Issue
Oversight
1.2.4.2 Service Provision role
Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?
N/A If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate:
N/A
Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?
N/A
Additional Information:
1.2.4.3 User role
Additional Information: OAT provided by Military ATC units
Additional Information: Military ATC units do not provide services to GAT
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
National AIP Y National AIP N/A
National Military AIP Y National Military AIP N/A
EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N/A
Other: N Other: N/A
OAT GAT
National oversight body for OAT: Ministry of Defence NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A
Additional information: Additional information: GAT is provided by respective ATS units (ACCs) of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System.
OAT GAT
Services Provided: Services Provided:
En-Route Y En-Route N
Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA N
Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND N
AIS Y AIS N
MET Y MET N
SAR Y SAR N
TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N
Other: N Other: N
Additional Information: Additional Information:
IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?
OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y
If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:
Free Routing Within specific corridors only Y
Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Y
Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 17 Released Issue
1.2.4.4 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
Remark:FUA requirements at the Levels 2 and 3are implemented by the military in the framework of the Integrated civil-military ATM system of Ukraine.
1.3 Air navigation services
1.3.1 Current Situation
Due to the current situation in the Eastern part of Ukraine and Autonomous Republic of Crimea (ARC), there was an urgent need to introduce changes/reconfigurations (see Fig 4, 5) of the Ukrainian air traffic management (ATM) system and to the air navigation services (ANS) provided by UkSATSE. Those ATM/ANS changes concerned both the Ukrainian national airspace and the airspace over the High Seas, where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements (hereinafter - airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine).
Those changes/reconfigurations were aimed at ensuring safe and continuous provision of air navigation services in the airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine.
The airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine is that within the boundaries of the Flight Information Regions (FIRs) and Upper Flight Information Region (UIR) in accordance with the basic principles of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Ukraine provides air traffic services in the airspace over the High Seas on the basis of valid bilateral and multilateral agreements with the neighbouring countries, including the Russian Federation, based on the ICAO Council Decision of February 17, 1997 (No. EUR/NAT96/38-ATS).
The provision of air navigation services is safe at all levels and is based on the implementation of the concept of constant and continuous service provision with the use of appropriate policies, procedures and equipment, including mutual ATM Centres contingency and back-up.
The concept of ATM Centres contingency and back-up started in the early 2000s, particularly in Simferopol' FIR, based on studies of seismic processes of the Crimean Peninsula, and their possible impact on the infrastructure of UkSATSE that was located there and the associated service provision.
Ukraine has determined that the seismic situation of the Crimean Peninsula is the source of unacceptable risks for the provision of air traffic services in Simferopol' FIR in the absence of backing-up of Simferopol’ ATM Centre by other ATM Centres.
The schemes of the general seismic zoning of Ukraine for the seismic gap of 100 and 1000 years (based on studies conducted by the Subotin Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine) and options of ATM Centres backing-up by other Centres (based on "Concept backing-up of ATC Centres of Ukraine", 2003) are given in Annex 1.The concept covered Ukrainian ACCs and auxiliary ACCsexisting at that time (in 2007 UkSATSE developed and established common contingency procedures for all its ATC units based on Amendment 42 to Annex 11 to Chicago Convention).
If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:
No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y
Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF
CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Mode S ACAS Y
Others: Some transport state aircraft are approved for flight in RVSM airspace.
Military in <Ukraine> applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y
FUA Level 1 implemented: Y
FUA Level 2 implemented: Y
FUA Level 3 implemented: Y
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 18 Released Issue
This concept was taken as a base for developing contingency measures but also as a major input for the UkSATSE modernisation plan. Those measures were used during the capture of Simferopol’ Centre and facilities of communication, navigation and surveillance in Crimea. The contingency procedures applied comply with the provisions and principles of EUROCONTROL, general requirements for air navigation service providers in the European region and the requirements of Annex 11 of the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation.
UkSATSE also developed a modernization plan based on the European ATM Master Plan and the EuropeanSingle Sky Implementation Plan (ESSIP) objectives. The planned modernisation steps will be performed according to Ukrainian Strategy of the Air Navigation system development for the years 2015-2025 that was elaboratedjointly by Ukraine and EUROCONTROL in framework of Project Management Plan (PMP) WP9 according to Agreement signed in 2009 between EUROCONTROL and SAA of Ukraine with the main goal of establishing a single ATM Centre.Prior to 2014, UkSATSE already had plans for the modernization of ATC Systems in all ATM Centres (ACCs) including reorganisation of air navigation services within Simferopol’ FIR. Those plans immediately were implemented during the Spring 2014.
Due to existence of the modernisation plan, UkSATSE was in the position to transferthe area control service fromSimferopol’ ACC to Odessa and Dnipropetrovs’k ACCs and, thus, to continue without any interruption in the safe air navigation services provision. The efficiency level of procedures, personnel and technical equipment operation, necessary for the provision of air navigation services, remained unchanged.
In order to fulfil the safety and security-related requirements concerning the conflict zones,Ukraine implemented additional measures, particularly setting airspace restrictions and prohibitions within various portions of the Ukrainian airspace.
Ukraine confirms its firm support, commitment and adherence to the principles of the Convention on International Civil Aviation by ensuring the safe operations within the airspace under responsibility of Ukraine.
Fig.4 Transfer of area control service of Simferopol’ ACC to Odessa and Dnipropetrovs’k ACCs
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 19 Released Issue
Fig.5 ATS sectors over the High Seas after transfer ofarea control service fromSimferopol’ ACC to Odessa and Dnipropetrovs’k ACCs
1.3.2 Air Traffic Flows above FL 275
After the transition to the new configuration of services, as a result of the crisis situation, the distribution of air traffic flows changed significantly during the year 2014.
The Figures 6-10 below reflect the changes of the air traffic flows and the traffic decrease.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 20 Released Issue
Fig.6 1977 IFR GAT flights, serviced in Ukraine FIR August 02, 2013
Fig.7 790 IFR GAT flights, serviced in Ukraine FIR August 01, 2014 (-60%)
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 21 Released Issue
Fig.8 Number of IFR GAT flights, serviced in Ukraine FIR in 2014 (per month)
The current air traffic flows above FL 275 are depicted in the pictures below. The traffic flows vary depending on the day of the week and/or the season.
Fig.9 Air Traffic Flows above FL 275 during DEC 19-20 2014 taking into account the established Ukrainian airspace prohibitions and restrictions.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 22 Released Issue
Fig.10 Air Traffic Flows above FL 275 during FEB 27-28 2015 taking into account the established Ukrainian airspace prohibitions and restrictions.
1.3.3 The conflict zones
In accordance with ICAO State letter № SMM 1/4-15/16 dated 20.03.2015 Ukraine submitted information regarding the conflict zones to ICAO (see fig 3).
“There are two portions of airspace within Ukrainian sovereign territory that could be considered as conflict zones in accordance with ‘conflict zone’ description laid down in the para 1.1. of the Interim procedure:
- temporary restricted area (SFC-UNL) is established over the conflict zone, including buffer zone in horizontal plane, within Dnipropetrovs’k FIR and UTA Dnipropetrovs’k-North by the decision of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine according to the request of the Air force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in order to provide flight safety for civil aircraft and to prevent operations of civil aircraft. The series of corresponding NOTAMs have been published since July 2014. The last NOTAM A0427/15 is dated 3rd March 2015 (attached);
- prohibited area UK-P35 (SFC-UNL) and the relevant buffer zone UK-P35Z (SFC-UNL) are
established within Simferopol’ FIR, UTA Dnipropetrovs’k-South and UTA Odesa-South over the temporary occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea by the decision of the State Aviation Administration in coordination with the General Headquarters of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Flights are not allowed within this area. Complete information regarding UK-P35 and UK-P35Z is published in AIP of Ukraine, ENR 5.1-4 and ENR 5.1-5 (attached).
There are no other risks to civil aviation in other parts of Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements.”.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 23 Released Issue
Fig.11 Temporary restricted area in the eastern part of Ukraine and UK-P35Z over temporary occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea
1.3.4 Safety Case
Safety Case regarding provision of air navigation services within Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements.
Ukraine in collaboration with EUROCONTROL developed the draft “Safety Case regarding provision of air navigation services within Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements” (hereafter - Safety Case) in response to the necessity to make changes in air navigation services provision by Ukrainian State Air Traffic Services Enterprise (hereinafter referred to as UkSATSE) within Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for air traffic services (ATS) provision is delegated to Ukraine by regional air navigation agreement approved by ICAO Council.
The main changes described in this document are related to the new configuration of services within Simferopol’ FIR resulting from the crisis situation in parts of the Ukrainian airspace.
The aim of this document is to provide evidence supporting the statements that the declared types of air navigation services within the airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine are and will be provided at acceptable safety levels.
Moreover, this Safety Case supports Aircraft Operator’s decision-making process for the operations within the airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine.
The document highlights UkSATSE’s capabilities to provide safe air navigation services in the airspace of Ukraine and airspace over the High Seas under responsibility of Ukraine:
– Ukraine continues to ensure full compliance with international and national requirements imposed on ANS providers and services specified in the certificates issued by State Aviation Administration of Ukraine and independent organisations and confirmed by the results of ICAO audit within USOAP/CMA program;
– Ukraine and UkSATSE successfully interact with national governmental bodies and co-operate with all parties involved at organizational, technical and procedural levels.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 24 Released Issue
– UkSATSE has fully safe, efficient and state-of-art infrastructure,operational procedures,civil-military coordination andairspace management, aeronautical information management, search and rescue and other components responding to all European requirements;
– UkSATSEhas sufficient and adequately trained personnel;
– UkSATSE has efficient and proven contingency procedures which correspond to recommendations of the international aviation organizations;
– UkSATSE developed additional measures for the provision of safe services under actual conditions to gradually restart the utilisation of the ATS route network over the High Seas;
The document was developed with consideration of the ICAO proposals moved forward within the framework of coordination meeting of representatives of ICAO, IATA, FAA, EUROCONTROL and Ukraine held in Montreal (Canada) on January 31, 2015. Those proposals can be summarised as follows:
In order to minimize the effect of the identified hazards Ukraine is going to use a staged/phased approach to determine the airspace available for planning of civil aircraft flights over the High Seas.
Only the following ATS route segments over the High Seas will be initially allowed for flight planning for the Phase 1a:
M860 KUGOS – DIGAM between FL330-660; L851 KUGOS – ADINA between FL330-660; M854 SUMOL – RASIL between FL290-320; M856 RAKUR – DIGAM between FL290-320;
under the following conditions:
provision of longitudinal separation in accordance with the most recent updates of the Letters of Agreement between Odesa ACC and Bucharest ACC and Ankara ACC, respectively;
change of flight level, speed and radar vectoring shall not be allowed, except when required for tactical or emergency purposes and for provision of separation;
notification of aircraft operators by issuing the corresponding Ukrainian NOTAM about the unavailability of the corresponding route segments in case of military activity which is of potential hazard to civil aviation even if such military activities are performed below the listed ATS routes;
publishing NOTAMs based on information issued by ICAO, EUROCONTROL, other international organizations, other States about unavailable airspace and associated ATS route segments in case of conducting military activity potentially hazardous to civil aviation;
full provision of air traffic control services within the determined area over the High Seas by Odesa ACC with full VHF, radar and other infrastructure available;
introduction of the corresponding changes to the LoA between Odesa ACC and Ankara ACC, Odesa ACC and Bucharest ACC concerning provision of the above-mentioned conditions;
EUROCONTROL/Network Manager ensures flight plans check and distribution based on the availability of the four ATS routes as described above.
It is considered that the availability of the four ATS routes in the western part of the airspace over the High Seas is not at all influencedby the hazards connected with Russian Federation activity as there are no common boundaries and coordination points between Odesa ACC and ATS units of the Russian Federation for those ATS routes, no incidents of any nature have been detected or reported within above mentioned airspace since March 2014 and, currently, a reasonably high number of flights continues to operate on those routes:
Phase І.b. Opening the utilisation of additional routes (М861 RAKUR - ROMOK – BIRMA, М435 LAROM – RASIL) in the western part of the airspace over the High Seas within UTA Odesa-South.
All the other existing ATS routes within Simferopol’ FIR, UTA Odesa-South and UTA Dnipropetrovs’k-
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 25 Released Issue
South over the High Seas will be unavailable for flight planning.
Stage ІІ: Deployment of the whole ATS route network in the western part and eastern part of the airspace over the High Seas within UTA Odesa-South and UTA Dnipropetrovs’k-South, for flight planning and operations of civil aircraft (in addition to the first stage).
Stage ІІІ: Opening of the whole airspace within Simferopol’ FIR, UTA Odesa-South and UTA Dnipropetrovs’k-South for flight planning and operations of civil aircraft.
The risk assessment procedure shows that the identified risks are acceptable.
Finally, the document contains the main conclusion that UkSATSE does not have any technical and procedural problems for service provision in the airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine.
Consultation process with airlines and ICAO related to the Safety Case issues is ongoing.
Fig.12 Available ATS routes within the determined area over the High Seas (Phase І.а)
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 26 Released Issue
Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity
2.1 Evolution of traffic in Ukraine
0
100.000
200.000
300.000
400.000
500.000
600.000
2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F
IFR
flig
hts
Ukraine - Annual IFR Movements
IFR movements - Actuals
IFR movements - Baseline forecast
IFR movements - High forecast
IFR movements - Low forecast
International Dep/Arr
30%
Domestic flights 6%
Overflights 64%
Ukraine - Distribution (Ref. year 2013)
A = ActualF = Forecast
2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F
H -31.8% 2.5% 8.5% 8.3% 7.9% 8.0% 7.7%
B 5.5% 2.9% 6.0% -32.1% -0.1% 5.9% 6.2% 5.8% 6.2% 6.0%
L -32.4% -2.7% 3.3% 4.3% 4.4% 4.1% 3.7%
ESRA08 B 3.1% -2.4% -1.1% 1.8% 2.4% 2.8% 2.3% 2.3% 2.8% 3.1%
EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2014)IFR flights yearly growth
Ukraine
2014
Traffic in the Ukraine decreased by 44.4% during summer 2014 (May to October inclusive), when compared to summer 2013.
2015-2019
The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 2.7% and 7.0% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 4.8%.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 27 Released Issue
2.2 DNIPROPETROVSK ACC
2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Peak Day Traffic 527 577 703 645 476
Summer Traffic 443 488 522 540 200
Yearly Traffic 382 422 446 467 294
Summer Traffic Forecast 203 211 223 235 248
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 205 219 236 255 273
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 202 206 214 221 230
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
En
rout
e D
ela
y (m
inu
tes
pe
r fli
gh
t)
IFR
flig
hts
(D
aily
Ave
rag
e)
UKDVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014
2.2.2 Summer 2014 performance
Traffic Evolution 2014 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity
gap Ref value Actual
-63.0 % 54 (+10%) 0.29 0.00 No
Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.
Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments
Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives No
Implementation of FCM01 is partially implemented; the implementation of CPRs was temporally postponed (since April 2014) and then it was resumed. The related ATM system adjustments are in progress. Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)
ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL No
Training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL was suspended by UkSATSE since April 2014
Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes
Maximum configuration: 4 sectors No
The area of responsibility of Dnipropetrovsk ACC was changed which lead to change of maximum configuration (6 sectors)
Summer 2014 performance assessment
The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 54, 10% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 28 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 24.
2.2.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 – Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 28 Released Issue
2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.010.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesUKDVCTA
AnnualSummer
H 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0%
Ref. 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0%
L 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0%
Open 54 0% 55 2% 56 2% 58 4% 62 7%
C/R 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0%
UKDV 54
Capacity Profiles
ACC2014
baseline Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Capacity Plan
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Free Route Airspace
Free Route Airspace
Implementation (FRAU
Ukraine, Scenarios
1A/1B – Night operations)
Free Route Airspace Implementation (FRAU Ukraine, Scenario 2A – Day operations)
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
Implementation of Advanced
Airspace Management
(LSSIP AOM19)
Airport & TMA Network Integration
Cooperative Traffic Management
Implementation of enhanced tactical flow
management services (LSSIP
FCM01) and collaborative
flight planning (LSSIP FCM03)
Airspace Procedures
Staffing
Technical
Capacity Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development
Significant Events
Max sectors 6 6 6 6 6
Capacity increase p.a. Sufficient capacity to meet demand
Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Additional information
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 29 Released Issue
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2015‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 54 54 54 54 54
Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 54 55 56 58 62
Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 54 54 54 54 54
Capacity Profile ‐ High 54 54 54 54 54
Capacity Profile ‐ Low 54 54 54 54 54
Capacity Baseline 49 54
2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 54 55 56 58 62
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Cap
acity profile (movements per hour)
UKDVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook No capacity problems are foreseen for Dnipropetrovs’k ACC during the current planning cycle
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 30 Released Issue
2.3 KYIV ACC
2.3.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Peak Day Traffic 789 876 1099 1004 945
Summer Traffic 630 713 754 783 604
Yearly Traffic 549 626 650 666 586
Summer Traffic Forecast 610 645 690 736 778
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 622 678 738 797 861
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 603 617 647 676 711
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
En
rout
e D
ela
y (m
inu
tes
pe
r fli
gh
t)
IFR
flig
hts
(D
aily
Ave
rag
e)
UKBVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014
2.3.2 Summer 2014 performance
Traffic Evolution 2014 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity
gap Ref value Actual
-22.8 % 73 (+1%) 0.12 0.00 No
Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.
Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments
Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes
Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives Yes
Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)
ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL No
Training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL was suspended by UkSATSE since April 2014
Maximum configuration: 7 sectors Yes
Summer 2014 performance assessment
The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 73, 1% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 58 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 50.
2.3.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.010.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01
En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesUKBVCTA
SummerAnnual
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 31 Released Issue
H 73 0% 74 1% 76 3% 78 3% 81 4%
Ref. 73 0% 73 0% 74 1% 75 1% 76 1%
L 73 0% 73 0% 73 0% 73 0% 73 0%
Open 73 0% 73 0% 74 1% 76 3% 79 4%
C/R 73 0% 73 0% 74 1% 75 1% 76 1%
UKBV 73
ACC2014
baseline Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Capacity Plan
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Free Route Airspace
Free Route Airspace
Implementation (FRAU
Ukraine, Scenarios
1A/1B – Night operations)
Free Route Airspace Implementation (FRAU Ukraine, Scenario 2A – Day operations)
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
Implementation of Advanced
Airspace Management
(LSSIP AOM19)
Airport & TMA Network Integration
Cooperative Traffic Management
Implementation of enhanced tactical flow
management services (LSSIP
FCM01) and collaborative
flight planning (LSSIP FCM03)
Airspace Procedures
Staffing
Technical
Capacity Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development
Significant Events
Max sectors 7 7 7 7 7
Capacity increase p.a. Sufficient capacity to meet demand
Reference profile 0% 0% 1% 1% 1%
Additional information
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 32 Released Issue
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2015‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 73 73 74 75 76
Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 73 73 74 76 79
Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 73 73 74 75 76
Capacity Profile ‐ High 73 74 76 78 81
Capacity Profile ‐ Low 73 73 73 73 73
Capacity Baseline 72 73
2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 73 74 76 78 81
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90Cap
acity profile (movements per hour)
UKBVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook No capacity problems are foreseen for Kyiv ACC during the current planning cycle.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 33 Released Issue
2.4 LVIV ACC
2.4.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Peak Day Traffic 644 721 757 796 697
Summer Traffic 514 546 554 574 379
Yearly Traffic 451 486 488 503 408
Summer Traffic Forecast 387 398 416 439 462
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 392 415 447 475 507
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 381 381 393 400 420
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
En
rout
e D
ela
y (m
inu
tes
pe
r fli
gh
t)
IFR
flig
hts
(D
aily
Ave
rag
e)
UKLVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014
2.4.2 Summer 2014 performance
Traffic Evolution 2014 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity
gap Ref value Actual
-34.0 % 72 (0%) 0.00 0.00 No
Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.
Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments
Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes
ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL No
Training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL was suspended by UkSATSE since April 2014
Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives No
Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 (operational FSAs and CPRs) will be possible after the commencement of operations from the new ATM system.
Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)
Installation of new ATM system
(training and transition periods – from August to November 2014) No
The commencement of operations from the new ATM system was shifted to March 2015
Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes
Summer 2014 performance assessment
The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. The peak 1 hour demand was 45 flights, and the peak 3 hour demand was 40 flights.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 34 Released Issue
2.4.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.010.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
AnnualSummer
UKLVCTAEn-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values
H 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%
Ref. 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%
L 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%
Open 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%
C/R 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%
UKLV 72
Capacity Profiles
ACC2014
baseline Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Capacity Plan
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Free Route Airspace
Free Route Airspace
Implementation (FRAU
Ukraine, Scenarios
1A/1B – Night operations)
Free Route Airspace Implementation (FRAU Ukraine, Scenario 2A – Day operations)
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
Implementation of Advanced
Airspace Management
(LSSIP AOM19)
Airport & TMA Network Integration
Cooperative Traffic Management
Implementation of enhanced tactical flow
management services (LSSIP
FCM01) and collaborative
flight planning (LSSIP FCM03)
Airspace Procedures
Staffing
Technical Installation of
new ATM system
Capacity Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development
Significant Events
Max sectors 4 4 4 4 4
Capacity increase p.a. Sufficient capacity to meet demand
Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Additional information
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 35 Released Issue
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2015‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 72 72 72 72 72
Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 72 72 72 72 72
Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 72 72 72 72 72
Capacity Profile ‐ High 72 72 72 72 72
Capacity Profile ‐ Low 72 72 72 72 72
Capacity Baseline 72 72
2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 72 72 72 72 72
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80Cap
acity profile (movements per hour)
UKLVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
2.5 ODESA ACC
2.5.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Peak Day Traffic 416 450 480 543 556
Summer Traffic 307 324 332 387 361
Yearly Traffic 250 266 272 302 294
Summer Traffic Forecast 377 399 428 451 480
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 385 416 450 485 523
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 372 384 400 421 439
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
En
rout
e D
ela
y (m
inu
tes
pe
r fli
gh
t)
IFR
flig
hts
(D
aily
Ave
rag
e)
UKOVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014
2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook No capacity problems are foreseen for Lviv ACC during the current planning cycle.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 36 Released Issue
2.5.2 Summer 2014 performance
Traffic Evolution 2014 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity
gap Ref value Actual
-6.9 % 61 (+3%) 0.00 0.00 No
Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.
Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments
Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes
Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives No
Implementation of FCM01 is partially implemented; the implementation of CPRs was temporally postponed (since April 2014) and then it was resumed. Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)
ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL No
Training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL was suspended by UkSATSE since April 2014
Maximum configuration: 3 sectors No
The area of responsibility of Odesa ACC was changed which lead to change of maximum configuration (5 sectors)
Summer 2014 performance assessment
The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 61 in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 33 flights and the the peak 3 hour demand was 28 flights.
2.5.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.010.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01Summer
En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesUKOVCTA
Annual
H 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0%
Ref. 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0%
L 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0%
Open 65 7% 69 6% 74 7% 80 8% 84 5%
C/R 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0%
UKOV 61
Capacity Profiles
ACC2014
baseline Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 37 Released Issue
Capacity Plan
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Free Route Airspace
Free Route Airspace
Implementation (FRAU
Ukraine, Scenarios
1A/1B – Night operations)
Free Route Airspace Implementation (FRAU Ukraine, Scenario 2A – Day operations)
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
Implementation of Advanced
Airspace Management
(LSSIP AOM19)
Airport & TMA Network Integration
Cooperative Traffic Management
Implementation of enhanced tactical flow
management services (LSSIP
FCM01) and collaborative
flight planning (LSSIP FCM03)
Airspace Procedures
Staffing
Technical
Capacity Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development
Significant Events
Max sectors 5 5 5 5 5
Capacity increase p.a. Sufficient capacity to meet demand
Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Additional information
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 38 Released Issue
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2015‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 61 61 61 61 61
Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 65 69 74 80 84
Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 61 61 61 61 61
Capacity Profile ‐ High 61 61 61 61 61
Capacity Profile ‐ Low 61 61 61 61 61
Capacity Baseline 59 61
2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 65 69 74 80 84
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90Cap
acity profile (movements per hour)
UKOVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook No capacity problems are foreseen for Odesa ACC during the current planning cycle.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 39 Released Issue
Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations
Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2013 applicable to Ukraine for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.
Reference number
Recommendation Ownership
REC-2013-1 (1)
Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.
UA
State feedback: UkSATSE implementedFCM01 within Kyiv ACC.Odesa - FCM01 will be implemented after hardware (Entry Node) configuring by the producer
L’viv ACCs - FCM01 will be implemented after hardware (Entry Node) configuring by the producer and commencement of operations from the new ATM system.
Dnipropetrovsk ACC - FCM01 will be implemented after the modernization of the ATM system and after hardware (Entry Node) configuring by the producer.
Full FCM01 implementation will be finished by the end of 2015.
REC-2013-1 (2) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of SRC-RLMK to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.
UA
State feedback: The 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 ESARRs are fully implemented at the level of regulations. The second edition of "The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System" was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010). For ESARR 5, complementary national rules are still being drafted and foreseen to be ready by the end of 2015
REC-2013-1 (3) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of SRC-SLRD to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.
UA
State feedback: The acceptable level of safety and process of its constant review are established by SAAU ("Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" dated 31/05/2010 N 320). The Air Code was approved by the Ukrainian Parliament with establishment of the main principles of Just Culture.
REC-2013-1 (4) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOP04.1 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.
UA (UKBB)
State feedback: A contract has been signed to implement MLAT system and integrate it to the existing Kyiv ATC System to control surface movements. 2 SMRs will be installed and integrate into ATC System and A-SMGCS according to the implementation plan at UKBB
REC-2013-1 (8) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOP03 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.
UA
State feedback: The SAA of Ukraine has issued the Rules for certification of Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N796 dated 25.10.2005) and Certification requirements for Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N201 dated 17.03.2006) which describes procedures of safety oversight as well. The appropriate actions will be reviewed in accordance with new addition of EAPRI (Version 2.0). The initial steps have been taken.
The SAA of Ukraine developed the new drafts of Ukrainian regulations in accordance with ICAO provisions. The process of approval of the Ukrainian regulations still continues.
Implementation of SMS and certification of aerodromes in accordance with Annex 14 will be done after approval process in due course.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 40 Released Issue
Reference number
Recommendation Ownership
REC-2013-1 (13) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of COM10 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.
UA
State feedback: The equipment for AMHS centers were delivered but situation in Ukraine caused UkSATSE to postpone the implementation of centers. UkSATSE try to find the financimg to complete the project.
REC-2013-4 Ensure better planning reliability at local level. All States
State feedback: At UkSATSE level there are:
-Regulation for LSSIP updating and executive process;
- Strategy Plan;
- Business Plan;
- Financing Plan;
- Investment Plan.
All above mentioned planes are linked with each other (using LSSIP objectives abbreviations).
National Strategy of Air Navigation System development for 2015 -2025 years was prepared and currently is under review and endorsement in the SAAU.
REC-2013-5 The ANSPs should ensure synchronised system evolution between neighbouring States.
All ECAC ANSPs
State feedback: UkSATSE will take into account the around situation, collect needed data from partners and initiate the meetings with neighbouring States to insure synchronised system evolution.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 41 Released Issue
Chapter 4 - National Projects
The National projects currently ongoing in Ukraine are depicted in the table below.
Organisations Name Description Implementation Planning
EATM Links Status Performance Contribution1
UkSATSE (UA) ATC centres The upgrade of 4 ATC systems for L’viv ACC/APP/TWR, Kharkiv APP/TWR, Dnipropetrovsk ACC/APP/TWR, Odesa, ACC/APP/TWR consists on changing obsolete equipment to new one with extended functionality.
2010-2016 ESSIP: ATC02.2, ATC02.5, ATC02.6, ENV01, NAV03 OI-Steps: AOM-0601; AOM-0602; AOM-0701; CM-0801
Project is in progress ATC systems in Kyiv, Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovs’ have been implemented.. Planned dates for ATC systems upgrade completion: Lviv - 2015 Odesa - 2016
Safety and Capacity. The upgrade of ATC centres will allow to: - improve the reliability of ATM System operation by using modern computer and telecommunication technologies;- implement system functionality according to the EUROCONTROL and UkSATSE requirements to ATM System; - improve the capacity and air traffic safety in the area of UkSATSE's responsibility.
UkSATSE (UA)
BTN
Development (upgrade) of the fixed ground communication infrastructure of UkSATSE’s Backbone Telecommunication Network (BTN). The aim of development is to extend existing infrastructure (5 main nodes) to 23 regional units all over Ukraine.
2012-2016 ESSIP: COM09, COM10, COM11
Project is in progress. The Simferopol' main node was excluded from BTN structure.
Safety and Capacity Extension of BTN shall provide the possibility to exchange any type of ATC oriented information (data/voice) between any application within UkSATSE all over Ukraine.
Military Authority (UA), SAAU (UA), UkSATSE (UA)
FRA Ukraine Airspace Design WORKING PLAN
Edition Number: 1.0 Edition Date: 07.05.2013 Document approval by: Eurocontrol, Ministry of Defence of Ukraine, SAA of Ukraine and UkSATSE,
2017 ESSIP:AOM21 OI-Steps: AOM-0401: AOM-0402
Project is in progress. In accordance with FRA UKRAINE (FRAU) Airspace Design WORKING PLAN FRA implementation in Ukraine is planned to be implemented for 12/2017. The planning date of implementation the 1-step
Capacity: Increased through the better airspace utilisation. Safety: Some enhancement through reduction in controller workload. Environment: Reductions in emissions through use of more optimal routes. Cost-Efficiency: Savings in
1Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment – as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 42 Released Issue
(scenario 1a) of FRA in Ukraine is 05 March 2015.
route distances as well as fuel efficiency through increased use of preferred flight profiles.
UkSATSE (UA)
Implement measures to prevent air/ground communications induced safety occurrences
The SAAU made assessment of the European Action Plan for the prevention of air/ground communication induced safety occurrences. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.
2015 SAF05 UkSATSE has been completed all measures as ANSP. NSA shall perform the introduction of regulation within 2015.
-
UkSATSE (UA)
Implement measures to reduce the risk of level bust occurrences
The SAAU made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the prevention of level bust and of the level bust toolkit and related material. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.
2015 ESSIP:SAF04 UkSATSE has completed all measures as ANSP. NSA shall perform the introduction of regulation within 2015.
-
UkSATSE (UA)
Light Gun implementation
Purchase of equipment to replace the old-fashion signalling guns by modern light projectors for ATC Towers (12 sites).
2015 - The project will start from the beginning of 2015.
Safety: Provide the alternative method of communication between pilot on the ground and ATC Tower in case of radio communication failure according to ICAO Annex 14 «AERODROME DESIGN AND OPERATIONS».
UkSATSE (UA)
Rationalisation of navigation infrastructure (Phase 2)
Phase 2: Installation and implementation of 7 DME/(D)VOR/DME in UkSATSE’s regional branches.
2014-2015 - Project is in progress. Safety: Improvement of flight safety and navigation infrastructure on the airspace of Ukraine.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 43 Released Issue
UkSATSE (UA)
Registration facilities
Implementation of uniform video and audio registration and playback facilities in all ATC units of UkSATSE.
2015-2018 ESSIP:SAF10 It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT) procedure will be initiated in 2016.
Safety: The goal of this project is to improve the reliability and objectivity of the recorded information about controllers actions during the ATC.
UkSATSE (UA)
SMR's installation.
Installation of 2 Surface Movement Radars (SMR) for Kyiv (Boryspil’).
2016-2018 ESSIP: AOP04.2 OI-Steps: AO-0102
Project is in progress.It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT) procedure will be initiated by 2016.
Safety and Capacity: Implementation of SMRs will allow to improve the manoeuvring area awareness and to increase the responsiveness to ground situation changes in the absence of visual observation of all or part of the manoeuvring area due to: - providing radar monitoring of traffic on the manoeuvring area; - providing directional information to pilots and vehicle drivers as necessary; - providing advice and assistance for the safe and efficient movement of aircraft and vehicles on the manoeuvring area.
UkSATSE (UA)
SOFTWARE upgrade (ATIS)
Upgrading of software of ATIS systems in UkSATSE’s Regional Branches
2013-2016 - The project started at the end of 2013. It is expected that it will be finished in 2015 after implementation of the new national rules Of Met Service
Safety and Capacity: The upgrading of software will allow to increase the level of flight information service in TMA.
UkSATSE (UA)
SOFTWARE upgrade (VOLMET)
Upgrading of software of VOLMET in UkSATSEs Regional Branches
2013-2016 - The project started at the end of 2013. It is expected that it will be finished in 2015 after implementation of the new national rules Of Met Service
Safety and Capacity: The upgrading of software will allow to increase the level of flight information service.
UkSATSE (UA)
SOFTWARE TOOL
Procurement of instrument procedure design software tool to improve quality assurance in accordance with ICAO 9906 – “Quality Assurance Manual for Flight
2016-2017 ESSIP:NAV03 OI-Steps:AOM-0601; AOM-0602
Project will start at the beginning of 2016.
Safety and Cost-efficiency: Improvement of safety due to improvement in procedures design and cost effectiveness due to automation in the overall process.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 44 Released Issue
Procedure Design."
UkSATSE (UA)
TOWER Construction of new 3 Towers at civil aerodromes of Ukraine: Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovs'k and Kyiv (Boryspil’).
2010-2019 ESSIP:AOP03 OI-Steps: AO-0101
Project is in progress but time schedule reviewed. Kharkiv TWR is implemented.
Safety and Capacity: The construction of new Towers and procurement of new modular Tower will allow to re-equip them with new modern CNS aids in accordance with the EUROCONTROL requirements to TWR ATC units. The result of this activity will increase equipment reliability and maintainability and consequently – safety and capacity of air traffic
UkSATSE (UA)
USENET 5 nodes of USENET(surveillance data distribution network) are planned to be installed in UkSATSEs Regional Branches
2016-2018 - Project is in progress. Development of Technical Requirements is completed. It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT) procedure will be initiated by 2016.
Safety, Capacity, Cost-efficiency: Network shall provide a single ground transport environment between any resources and users, who are a part of the Surveillance System of Ukraine (SSU), and also between them and other authorised civil and military stakeholders on the territory of Ukraine.
UkSATSE (UA)
VSAT Installation of new equipment in Dnipropetrovs’k, and Odesa for modernization and extension of satellite communication system VSAT.
2012-2016 - It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT) procedure will be initiated soon.
VSAT equipment as a back-up means the provision of reliable voice communication between adjacent ACC of the Black Sea region States.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 45 Released Issue
Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination
5.1 Cooperation
No cross-border FAB project is envisaged in Ukraine for the moment.
5.1.1.Adjacent ACCs/UACs
In order to achieve some of the ESSIP objectives, Ukrainian ACC(s) will have to co-ordinate actions with a number of foreign adjacent ACCs/UAC, as indicated in the CIP Status Report.
The LSSIP document will help foster regional co-ordination with neighbouring states by identifying mutually dependent actions.
Co-operation has been established with Belarus, Poland, Hungary, the Slovak Republic, Romania, Moldova, Bulgaria, Turkey and the Russian Federation concerning airspace structure, ATS route planning, co-ordination methods and ATM procedures.
5.1.2. Common Aviation Area Agreement
Ukraine is not a Member of the European Union and presently is not in the applicability area of the Single European Sky however, Ukraine has the intention to conclude a Common Aviation Area Agreement with the European Union. By Presidential Decree dated 19 October, 2007 № 891/2007 a mandate was given to a specially established Delegation to negotiate an ECAA Agreement with the EU. To assist the Delegation, the SAAU organised 4 working groups (economics, environment, safety and industry) to prepare a draft for such an agreement. The EC established 4 working groups with the same subjects as well. For this reporting period eight high level meetings and a number of working meetings were organised in order to draft a text of the Agreement. Initiation of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between Ukraine and EU and its member states took place in Vilnius on 28 of November 2013.
The aim of the Agreement is the gradual creation of a Common Aviation Area between the European Union, its Member States and Ukraine, which is founded in particular on identical rules in the areas of safety, security, air traffic management, environment, consumer protection, computer reservation systems, as well as with regard to social aspects. For this purpose the Agreement sets out the rules, technical requirements, administrative procedures, basic operational standards, implementing rules applicable between the Parties under the conditions set out also hereafter. The Common Aviation Area Agreement is based on free access to the air transportation market and equal conditions of competition.
The Agreement shall enter into force one month after the date of the last note in an exchange of diplomatic notes between the Parties confirming that all necessary procedures for entry into force of this Agreement have been completed. In the meantime, Ukraine is taking steps to harmonise its national legislation with the related EC Regulations and Directives.
5.1.3. Cooperation in the area of Satellite Based Augmentation Systems – EGNOS Extension in Ukraine
On 27 November 2013 the Joint Statement on cooperation in the area of Satellite Based Augmentation Systems – EGNOS Extension to Ukraine was signed between Government of Ukraine and European Commission. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) technologies, applications and services play a key role for economic and social development and industrial competitiveness in Ukraine and the European Union. Therefore, the Government of Ukraine and the European Commission decided to promote cooperation on GNSS applications and services. In this context, the Ukrainian Government and the European Commission have envisaged as a priority initiative to foster cooperation activities in the specific area of providing a satellite based augmentation service to Ukraine through the extension of the EGNOS system. Among these activities, two areas are mainly focused: research and development
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 46 Released Issue
program within the framework of Horizon 2020 EC program and further work on Institutional Agreement for the use of EGNOS in Ukraine with the support of GSA and Delegation of EU to Ukraine.
5.1.4. Project Management Plan for EUROCONTROL support
The Agreement for EUROCONTROL`s support to the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine has been signed on 22/10/2010 by DG of Eurocontrol and Chairman of SAAU.
The relevant Project Management Plan (PMP) was developed and approved on 30/06/2011.
The PMP includes the following working packages (WP):
WP0: Project Management - Completed (PMP V2.0 was signed by EUROCONTROL and Ukraine);
WP1:Assessment of the ATM/ANS regulations – Completed; WP2:Secondment of an SAAU expert to EUROCONTROL/DSS - in progress; WP3: Common development and production of a Strategic Business Plan in line with SIS
methodology: A 2-day courses were given by EUROCONTROL to Ukrainian UkSATSE and SAAU staff on 13-14 July and on 25-26 January 2012. A draft of Strategic Business Plan was developed.
WP4: Assessment of Service Provision - Completed; WP5: Assessment of civil-military component: Completed; WP6: Assessment of risks and their mitigation regarding fir’s borders with non-EUROCONTROL
MS airspace - Completed; WP7: Support in the development of a Ukrainian performance scheme - in progress; From
September to November 2012 two persons from UkSATSE were seconded to the PRU. They received training and elaborated draft of the RP1 Ukrainian Performance Plan. In a framework of deliverable D05b it is planned to develop Ukrainian Performance Plan for RP2.
WP8: Support during the establishment of the NSA –Completed. A 2-day course was given by EUROCONTROL to Ukrainian UkSATSE and SAAU staff on 25-26 January 2012.
WP9: The Agreement for EUROCONTROL`s support to the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine has been signed on 22/10/2010 by DG of Eurocontrol and Chairman of SAAU. The relevant Project Management Plan (PMP) was developed and approved .In the context of the “Agreement” EUROCONTROL will provide support to the Future ATM Development of Ukraine Project.WP9 investigated the feasibility of the Future ATM Development and the different tasks in WP9 will provide input to the feasibility study.
WP9 started on 1 January 2013 and each Task was completed. Deliverables such as a new operational concept, resectorisation options, cost benefit analysis, CNS considerations, a Safety assessment and Human Performance considerations including methods and know-how were concluded as follows:
Task 9.2 Preliminary Sectorisation Options. The deliverable (D10) with a revised proposal for sectorisation was delivered in September 2013, two months early. This task is closed.
Task 9.3 CNS Infrastructure Analysis: A CNS workshop was held in September 2013 where CNS issues were addressed. In March 2014 dedicated assistance was provided on the subject of surveillance, enabling the data sets prepared by UkSATSE to be made ready for simulation. Guidance and support, working methods and tools were provided to UkSATSE representatives. A further three days of dedicated support was provided by EUROCONTROL in May 2014 for surveillance coverage simulation. The proposed recommendations from this work will be considered by UkSATSE and included in the Feasibility report as required. In the next (planning) phase of the project in-depth work is required to develop a CNS strategy and deployment plan. Task 9.3 is closed for the feasibility phase.
Task 9.4 Human Performance considerations: An updated draft of Human Performance assessment method and subjects for consideration. This task is closed for the feasibility phase.
Task 9.5: Safety Assessment: The deliverable was distributed in January 2014. This task is considered closed.
Task 9.6: Business Case Development: EUROCONTROL delivered a toolkit to prepare a “business case straw-man” and a draft business case report in October 2013. Using the toolkit,
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 47 Released Issue
different scenarios can be built and costs and benefits compared to support decision making by executives. EUROCONTROL’s contribution to this task for the feasibility phase is closed.
Task 9.7: Operational Concept Definition: The final version was delivered to Ukraine in January 2014. This task is considered closed.
Knowledge was transferred to several UkSATSE representatives and options for more in-depth work made known for potential future developments. An internal UkSATSE feasibility analyses were expressed into National Strategy of air navigation system development for 2015 -2025 year. The National Strategy currently under review and endorsement process by SAA of Ukraine.
The Project Management Plan Version 4.0 was agreed and signed by EUROCONTROL and Ukraine in November 2014. The PMP V4.0 outlines the EUROCONTROL support until the end of 2017. According to the new version the EUROCONTROL will assist with:
development of a strategy for the migration from the current CNS structure which can be derived from CONOPs. EUROCONTROL will provide expertise, guidance material, best practices, assist with document structure and review;
assessment of the contribution of individual system components as described in the CONOPs to the overall business case;
development of a CONOPs validation plan. UkSATSE suggested to start this task with a quick assessment of the potential consequences of the current crisis in Ukraine on the CONOPs that was defined last year.
5.2 Regional cooperation
5.2.1 MoC between DHMI and UkSATSE
On 20th June 2012 the UkSATSE and DHMI have signed a Memorandum of Co-operation (MoC). This MoC should be evaluated in the context of and contributing to the regional co-operation in South-Eastern Europe and proposes actions to be taken by two Air Navigation Services Providers in order to enhance co-operation and co-ordination on ATM and CNS domains. There are two aspects at the MoC which define different cooperation lists:
1) Operational, consisting of:
- Harmonised ATM procedures and potential interface areas for improvements. - Airspace design and ATS route network. - Common operational activities. - ATC requirements for Flexible Use of Airspace.
2) Technical, consisting of:
- Technical activities in relation with the ATM systems. - Exchanging information and sharing experience on, equipment and technologies used. - Harmonising the procedures and training of technical staff.
The first bilateral meeting at operational level between representatives of DHMI and UkSATSE was held in Ankara, Turkey 6-7 November 2012.
During the meeting representatives of DHMI and UkSATSE discussed topics of common interest in terms of: harmonisation of ATM procedures in the interface of Turkish and Ukrainian airspace, development of the route network, improvement of co-ordination between technical staff, plans for development of the ATC systems and airports in Turkey etc.
The representatives of DHMI and UkSATSE also exchanged information concerning financial and economic issues.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 48 Released Issue
5.2.2 UkSATSE- MoldATSA, UkSATSE - ROMATSA
Within the framework of regional cooperation development, UkSATSE concluded the agreement with the Moldavian Air Traffic Services Authority (MoldATSA) in 2010 on reciprocal exchange of Chisinau (Moldova) and Odesa (Ukraine) Mode S MSSRs data. In addition, UkSATSE and Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration (ROMATSA) arrived at a joint decision to organize reciprocal exchange of Constantsa (Romania) and Odessa (Ukraine) Mode S MSSRs data to provide enhanced safety and efficiency of contingency planning on the regional basis and to ensure seamless and continuous services over the High Seas. It is expected that additional radar coverage will be provided.
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 49 Released Issue
Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation
Conventions
Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’:
o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and
o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.
Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**)
State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date
REG (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement
APO. Progress (**)
APO Impl. Date
ASP (By:mm-yyyy) ASP high level progress statement
ASP. Progress (**)
ASP Impl. Date
MIL (By:mm-yyyy) MIL high level progress statement
MIL. Progress (**)
MIL Impl. Date
APO (By:mm-yyyy) APO high level progress statement
APO. Progress (**)
APO Impl. Date
(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:
ECAC Completed No Plan
EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable
Multi-N Planned Missing Data
APT Late
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 50 Released Issue
AOM13.1
Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
[IDP] Planned
Common principles, rules and procedures for OAT/GAT handling in a mixed environment are in place but not fully compliant with relevant EUROAT Specification. Harmonisation of OAT/GAT handling taking into account EUROAT is considered for further application.
31/12/2018
REG (By:12/2018)
The revision of existing Regulations and development of regulatory material for implementation of new principles, rules and procedures for OAT/GAT handling in a mixed environment that comprise EUROAT is in the process.
Planned
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2018)
Common principles, rules and procedures for the OAT/GAT interface are applied but not fully compliant with EUROAT. Training competent ATS personnel to provide appropriate ATS to military is ongoing but not fully compliant with EUROAT as well. Harmonisation of OAT/GAT handling that comprises EUROAT is considered for further application.
Planned
31/12/2018
MIL (By:12/2018)
Common principles, rules and procedures for OAT/GAT handling in a mixed environment are in place. Harmonisation of OAT/GAT handling that comprises EUROAT is considered for further application. There is a special order of the MoD issued in 2011 to revise legislation concerning State Aviation in line with ECTL guidelines particularly.
Planned
31/12/2018
AOM19
Implement Advanced Airspace Management Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
[IDP]
Planned
FUA Level 1, 2 and 3 are all implemented. The implementation of the objective is expected to be completed in 2016.
31/12/2016
ASP (By:12/2016)
FUA Level 1, 2 and 3 are all implemented. The implementation of the objective is expected to be completed in 2016.
Planned
31/12/2016
AOM21
Implementation of Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
[IDP]
Planned
In accordance with FRA UKRAINE (FRAU) Airspace Design WORKING PLAN FRA implementation in Ukraine is planned to be implemented by 12/2017.
31/12/2017
ASP (By:12/2017)
In accordance with FRA UKRAINE (FRAU) Airspace Design WORKING PLAN FRA implementation in Ukraine is planned to be implemented for 12/2017. The planning date of implementation the 1‐step (scenario 1a) of FRA in Ukraine is 05 March 2015.
FRA Ukraine
Airspace Design
WORKING PLAN
Planned
31/12/2017
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 51 Released Issue
AOP03
Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/04/2003 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013
[IDP]
Late
The SAA of Ukraine has issued the Rules for certification of Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N796 dated 25.10.2005) and Certification requirements for Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N201 dated 17.03.2006) which describes procedures of safety oversight as well. The appropriate actions will be reviewed in accordance with new addition of EAPRI (Version 2.0). The initial steps have been taken. The SAA of Ukraine developed the new drafts of Ukrainian regulations in accordance with ICAO provisions. The process of approval of the Ukrainian regulations still continues. Implementation of SMS and certification of aerodromes in accordance with Annex 14 will be done after approval process in due course.
31/12/2015
REG (By:12/2013)
The SAA of Ukraine has issued the Rules for certification of Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N796 dated 25.10.2005) and Certification requirements for Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N201 dated 17.03.2006) which describes procedures of safety oversight as well. The appropriate actions will be reviewed in accordance with new addition of EAPRI (Version 2.0). The initial steps have been taken. The SAA of Ukraine developed the new drafts of Ukrainian regulations in accordance with ICAO provisions. The process of approval of the Ukrainian regulations still continues. Implementation of SMS and certification of aerodromes in accordance with Annex 14 will be done after approval process in due course.
Late
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2013)
The recommendations of the Runway Safety Action Plan are implemented by UkSATSE.
TOWER Completed
31/08/2012
APO (By:12/2013)
Boryspil' Airport has established a local Runway Safety Team in February 2007 (Updated Order of the DG of Boryspil' Airport H‐01‐07‐260 dated 22‐06‐2010). Safety Management Systems (SMS) Implemented in accordance with ICAO provisions.
For the military, airport procedures for UKBB are published in local Instructions in accordance with ICAO provisions, used and agrreed by MIL. Mil participates in work of the local Runway Safety Team established by Boryspil Airport.
Completed
30/06/2013
AOP04.1
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
Late
UKBB - KievMinistry of Infrastructure of Ukraine approved Rules of ATS surveillance services (Order N521 dated 07.11.2011)
31/12/2017
REG (By:12/2010)
Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine approved Rules of ATS surveillance services (Order N521 dated 07.11.2011)
Late
31/12/2017
ASP (By:12/2011)
MLAT was installed as a source of SSR surveillance information for ATC System and A‐SMGCS. 2 SMRs will be installed and integrate into ATC System and A‐SMGCS according to the implementation plan
Late
30/07/2017
APO (By:12/2010)
Installation of required A‐SMGCS control function equipment compatible to the MLAT system
Late
31/12/2016
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 52 Released Issue
AOP04.2
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
Planned
UKBB - KievA contract has been signed to implement MLAT system and integrate it to the existing Kyiv ATC System to control surface movements. 2 SMRs will be installed and integrate into ATC System and A‐SMGCS according to the implementation plan at UKBB
30/07/2017
ASP (By:12/2017)
MLAT system was implemented and integrated into existing ATC System at Kyiv (Borispil') TWR. 2 SMRs will be installed and integrate into ATC System and A‐SMGCS according to the implementation plan at UKBB.
SMR's
installation.
Planned
30/07/2017
APO (By:12/2017)
Installation of required A‐SMGCS control function equipment to the Ground Vehicles compatible to t the MLAT system.
Planned
31/12/2016
AOP05
Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/01/2016
[IDP]
Planned
UKBB - KievThe updated Order of the DG of Boryspil Airport H‐01‐07‐192 dated 02.03.2012 established the CDM Implementation Working Group. On the 14th Sept 2011 the Memorandum of Understanding was signed by main participants of A‐CDM. Existing implementation Plan is being updated and detailed now. According to the implementation plan testing of A‐CDM components in UKBB was started in May 2012.
31/01/2016
ASP (By:01/2016)
The updated Order of the DG of Boryspil Airport H‐01‐07‐260, dated 22.06.2010 established the CDM Implementation Working Group. On the 14th Sept 2011 the Memorandum of Understanding was signed by main participants of A‐CDM. Existing implementation Plan is updated and detailed now. According to the implementation plan testing of A‐CDM in UKBB started in May 2012.
Partly Completed
31/01/2016
APO (By:01/2016)
On the 14th Sept 2011 the Memorandum of Understanding was signed by main participants of A‐CDM. Existing implementation Plan is being updated and detailed now. According to the implementation plan testing of A‐CDM in KBP was started in May 2012. Updated Order of the DG of Boryspil' Airport H‐01‐07‐192 dated 02/03/2012, established the CDM Implementation Working Group.
Planned
31/01/2016
ATC02.2
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013
Completed
All ACCs are using STCA Level 1 and Level 2. The SAA conducts Safety oversight of the changes in accordance with procedures that are fully compatible with EC Regulation 1034/2011 (order of MoTC "Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" ‐ 320 dated 31/05/2010).
31/10/2013
ASP (By:01/2013) All ACCs are using STCA Level 1 and Level 2. ATC centres
Completed
31/10/2013
ATC02.5
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Completed
All ACCs are using APW Level 1 and Level 2. Ukraine formal policy for APW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011).
31/10/2013
ASP (By:12/2016)
APW function is implemented, documented and in operational use. The UkSATSE formal policy for APW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011).
ATC centres
Completed
31/10/2013
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 53 Released Issue
ATC02.6
Implement ground based safety nets ‐Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Completed
All ACCs are using MSAW Level 1 and Level 2. Ukraine formal policy for MSAW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011).
31/12/2013
ASP (By:12/2016)
MSAW function is implemented, documented and in operational use. The UkSATSE formal policy for MSAW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011).
ATC centres
Completed
31/10/2013
ATC02.7
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Completed
Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2 was implemented under Objective ATC02.6 31/12/2013
ASP (By:12/2016)
Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2 was implemented under Objective ATC02.6
Completed
31/12/2013
ATC07.1
Implement arrival management tools Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015
Completed
Initial arrival management tools are implemented in Kyiv ACC providing ATC for Kyiv TMA. Taking into account the arrival traffic density over the LSSIP timeframe the objective ATC07.1 is implemented for Kyiv TMA only.
31/03/2012
ASP (By:12/2015)
Initial arrival management tools are implemented in Kyiv ACC providing ATC for Kyiv TMA. Taking into account the arrival traffic density over the LSSIP timeframe the objective ATC07.1 is implemented for Kyiv TMA only.
Completed
31/03/2012
ATC12
Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Planned
The MTCD and conformance monitoring functions were approved by SAA within ATC System certification process. Guidance for MTCD and MONA and associated operational procedures will be approved by SAA in 2016
31/12/2016
ASP (By:12/2016)
Conflict detection and conformance monitoring tools have already implemented in all ACCs. Remaining actions will be implemented in 2016.
Planned
31/12/2016
ATC15
Implement, in En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
[IDP]
Not Applicable
Taking into account the traffic demand and capacity shortage issues the AMAN functionality will be implemented within Kiev TMA only. Kiev ACC and Kiev TMA use the same FDP database in this way the access for common flight data including AMAN sequence available at any working position. However HMI improvement for Kiev ACC sectors in respect to exact fulfilment of the task objective will be analyzed during 2015 year.
‐
ASP (By:12/2017)
Taking into account the traffic demand and capacity shortage issues the AMAN functionality will be implemented within Kiev TMA only. Kiev ACC and Kiev TMA use the same FDP database in this way the access for common flight data including AMAN sequence available at any working position. However HMI improvement for Kiev ACC sectors in respect to exact fulfilment of the task objective will be analyzed during 2015 year
Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 54 Released Issue
ATC16
Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015
Planned
Supervise compliance with regulatory provisions is planned to be done till 12/2015. A monitoring system of the performance of ACAS in the ATC environment is in place.
31/12/2015
REG (By:12/2015)
Supervise compliance with regulatory provisions is planned to be done till 12/2015.
Planned
31/12/2015
ASP (By:03/2012)
A monitoring system of the performance of ACAS in the ATC environment is in place. The training plan and package approved. All concerned personnel are trained.
Completed
30/04/2012
MIL (By:12/2015)
Requirements of EASA do not applicable to the state aircraft. Equipment with ACAS IIEASA to the state aircrafts of Ukraine is not planed.
Not Applicable
‐
ATC17
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
[IDP]
No Plan
The new ESSIP objective currently under review to define the scope of applicability ‐
ASP (By:12/2018)
The new ESSIP objective currently under review to define the scope of applicability
No Plan
‐
COM09
Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2006 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014
[IDP]
Late
SAA has mandated UkSATSE to migrate to IP The SAA has approved planned means & dates of compliance of UkSATSE to migrate to IPv6 (COM09‐ASP01, COM09‐ASP03). IP connections between main ACC centres are underway. Mil units do not provide services to general air traffic.
31/12/2016
ASP (By:12/2014)
IP connections between main ACC centres are underway. Development of the Plan for IP connections for outside Ukraine is in progress.
Mil units do not provide services to general air traffic. Migration to IP for the purposes of civil‐military coordination will be considered.
BTN
Late
31/12/2016
COM10
Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014
Late
Implementation has started. Deployment UkSATSEs segment of ATS AMHS service by means of implementation of the central AMHS system in Kyiv branch of UkSATSE equipped with an AFTN gateway is progressing. Installation of AMHS MTA is foreseen in the Dnipropetrovs'k and L'viv branches. The military users will continue to be connected to the network by AFTN Gateway.
31/08/2016
ASP (By:12/2014)
Deployment UkSATSEs segment of ATS AMHS service by means of implementation of the central AMHS system in Kyiv branch of UkSATSE equipped with an AFTN gateway is progressing. Installation of AMHS MTA is foreseen in the Dnipropetrovs'k and L'viv branches.
BTN
Late
31/08/2016
COM11
Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM
Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
Planned
The implementation of VoIP on VCS of ATC centers is included into the draft ANS development Strategy for 2015 ‐ 2025
31/12/2020
ASP (By:12/2020)
UkSATSE has planned the implementation of VoIP on VCS of ATC centers and include this issue into the UkSATSE investment Plan for 2014‐2018
BTN Planned
31/12/2020
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 55 Released Issue
ENV01
Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013
[IDP]
Completed
UKBB - KievUkraine is outside of the applicability area. Ukraine implemented CDO technique for UKBB.
31/10/2013
ASP (By:12/2013) Ukraine implemented CDO technique within Kyiv CTA and TMA for UKBB. ATC centres
Completed
31/10/2013
APO (By:12/2013) UKBB takes part in relevant actions of CDO Implementation Plan
Completed
31/10/2013
ENV02
Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) atAirports Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
Not Applicable
UKBB - Kiev(Outside Applicability Area)
Ukraine is outside of the applicability area. ‐ ASP (By:12/2016) Ukraine is outside of the applicability area.
Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2016) Ukraine is outside of the applicability area.
Not Applicable
‐
FCM01
Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006
Late
Ukraine fully joined EUROCONTROL in 2006. It is planned to implement ETFMS in all Ukrainian ACCs (ATC systems).
31/12/2015
ASP (By:07/2014)
It is planned to implement ETFMS in UkSATSE ATC systems of Dnipropetrovs'k, Kyiv, L'viv, and Odesa ACCs. Implementation will be executed after upgrading of ATC systems and installation of ETFMS Entry Node (EN) at Kyiv ACC. Standard Correlated Position Data from all Ukrainian ACCs will be provided to ETFMS via EN installed at Kyiv ACC.
Late
31/12/2015
FCM03
Implement collaborative flight planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015
[IDP]
Late
All Ukrainian ATC systems provide flight plan message processing in ICAO format and automatically process FPLs derived from RPLs. UkSATSE plans to process flight plan messages in ADEXP format as soon as Objective COM10 and ATM system modernisation is completed.
31/12/2016
ASP (By:12/2015)
All UkSATSE ATM systems provide flight plan message processing in ICAO format. UkSATSE plans to process flight plan messages in ADEXP format as soon as Objective COM10 and ATM systems modernisation is completed. The flight plan message processing in ADEXP format will be performed when objective COM10 is completed. The AFP message will be automatically provided by all ATC systems in ADEXP format according to systems installation/modernization schedule as follow: ‐Kiev ACC ‐ completed 02/2012, ‐Kharkiv APP, completed 08/2013, ‐Lviv ACC, replacement 05/2015, ‐Odesa ACC, partially completed 10/2012, ‐Dnipropetrovsk ACC, completed 02/2014. The operational flight plan message processing in ADEXP format will be performed when objective COM10 is completed.
Late
31/12/2016
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 56 Released Issue
FCM04
Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures ‐ phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
[IDP]
Not Applicable
Ukraine is outside of applicability area ‐ ASP (By:12/2015) Ukraine is outside of applicability area
Not Applicable
‐
FCM05
Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
[IDP]
No Plan
Implementation plan will be performed in 05/2015 31/12/2016 ASP (By:12/2016) Implementation plan will be performed in 05/2015
No Plan
31/12/2016
APO (By:12/2016) Implementation plan will be performed in 05/2015
No Plan
31/12/2016
INF04
Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012
Completed
Integrated briefing is implemented in UkSATSE and at the following international airports: Kyiv (Boryspil'), L'viv, Kyiv (Zhuliany), Kharkiv, Donets'k, Dnipropetrovs'k, Odesa and Simferopol'. Military AIS is under responsibility of Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. There are no plans to apply any international practices/procedures/guidelines in AIS operations for the time being.
31/12/2007
ASP (By:12/2012)
Integrated briefing is implemented in UkSATSE and at the following international airports: Kyiv (Boryspil'), L'viv, Kyiv (Zhuliany), Kharkiv, Donets'k, Dnipropetrovs'k, Odesa and Simferopol'.
Completed
31/12/2007
INF07
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018
Planned
Action will be provided through the activity of the Working Group onTOD Implementation, created under the authority of the State Aviation Administration
31/05/2018
REG (By:05/2018)
Action will be provided through the activity of the Working Group on TOD Implementation, created under the authority of the State Aviation Administration
Planned
31/05/2018
ASP (By:05/2018)
ANSP roadmap on TOD provision will be prepared within the framework of the activities of the Working Group on TOD Implementation, created under the authority of the State Aviation Administration and after national TOD policy and implementation programme establishment.
Planned
31/05/2018
APO (By:05/2018)
The roadmap on TOD provision will be prepared within the framework of the activities of the Working Group on TOD Implementation, created under the authority of the State Aviation Administration and after national TOD policy and implementation programme establishment.
Planned
31/05/2018
ITY‐ACID
Aircraft identification (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
Planned
Ukraine is outside of applicable area. However, there is an intention to implement the objective. 30/09/2019 ASP (By:01/2020) UkSATSE accept the implementation of the objective.
Planned
30/09/2019
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 57 Released Issue
ITY‐ADQ
Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
Not Applicable
Ukraine is outside of applicable area (EU area) ‐ REG (By:06/2017) Ukraine is outside of applicable area
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:06/2017) Ukraine is outside of applicable area.
Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:06/2017) Ukraine is outside of applicable area (EU area)
Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐AGDL
Initial ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
[IDP]
Not Applicable
Ukraine is outside of applicable area ‐ REG (By:02/2016) Ukraine is outside of applicable area
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:02/2016)
Ukraine is outside of applicable area. However, there is an intention to implement AGDL .
Not Applicable
31/12/2018
MIL (By:01/2014) Ukraine is outside of applicable area
Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐AGVCS2
Implement air‐ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
Not Applicable
Ukraine is outside of applicable area ‐ REG (By:12/2018) Ukraine is outside of applicable area
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2018) Ukraine is outside of applicable area.
Not Applicable
‐
MIL (By:12/2020) Ukraine is outside of applicable area
Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2018) Ukraine is outside of applicable area
Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐COTR
Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
Late
The OLDI Standard version 2.3 (for basic coordination under objective ATC03.1) was implemented in all Ukrainian ATC systems). No impacts on safety, capacity and cost effectiveness are identified in comparison with OLDI Specification 4.2. NSA ensures oversight of all changes to Ukrainian ATS systems during its certification.
28/02/2016
ASP (By:02/2016)
The OLDI Standard version 2.3 (for basic coordination under objective ATC03.1) was implemented in all Ukrainian ATC systems. No impacts on safety, capacity and cost effectiveness are identified in comparison with OLDI Specification 4.2.
Late
28/02/2015
MIL (By:12/2012)
Coordination will be provided between Civil ATS Units and Ukraerocenter in framework of Integrated ATM Civil Military System
Late
28/02/2015
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 58 Released Issue
ITY‐FMTP
Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014
[IDP]
Late
Transfer from OLDI to FMTP to exchange data between flight data processing systems. 31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2014)
To perform migration from OLDI to FMTP to exchange information between flight data processing systems it is envisaged to upgrade the existing UkSATSE ATC systems and to use resources of both PENS and UkSATSE BTN, as a national part of PENS in order to create environment for data distribution by FMTP.
Late
31/08/2016
MIL (By:12/2014)
Military Units have ATC systems are not interoperable with current civil ATC Systems.
Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐SPI
Surveillance performance and interoperability (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
Planned
Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine approved Rules of ATS surveillance services (Order N521 dated 07.11.2011) and certification requirements for ground‐based CNS facilities for civil aviation of Ukraine (Order N122 dated 25.05.2011) in accordance with ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements.
30/06/2015
REG (By:02/2015)
Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine approved Rules of ATS surveillance services (Order N521 dated 07.11.2011) and certification requirements for ground‐based CNS facilities for civil aviation of Ukraine (Order N122 dated 25.05.2011) in accordance with ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements.
Late
30/06/2015
ASP (By:02/2015)
Procedures for the implementation of new ATS surveillance facilities include preparation of technical and operational requirements, safety assessment and staff training. UkSATSE upgraded all en‐route SSR in accordance with Ukrainian legislation, ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements regarding surveillance performance and interoperability.
Late
31/12/2015
MIL (By:06/2020)
Objective does not mandatory for Ukraine. There is no State Program for equipped MIL aircrafts and MIL ground Systems with Mode S
Not Applicable
‐
NAV03
Implementation of P‐RNAV Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012
Completed
The SAA has accredited a Lufthansa Systems AG (SAA Decision 28.03.2012) and an Aviation Accounting Centre Ltd (SAA Decision 22.02.2013) as Navigation database suppliers
31/12/2013
ASP (By:12/2012)
RNAV 1 (P‐RNAV) departure and arrival procedures have been implemented
ATC centres /
SOFTWARE TOOL
Completed
31/12/2013
NAV10
Implement APV procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
[IDP]
Planned
A Plan for the implementation of APV is expected for approval by SAA. 31/12/2016 REG (By:04/2016) A Plan for the implementation of APV is expected for approval by SAA.
Planned
30/04/2016
ASP (By:12/2016)
Introduction of APV procedures is a part of National PBN Implementation plan ‐Implementation of Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Ukraine strategy and roadmap 2013 ‐ 2025
Planned
31/12/2016
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 59 Released Issue
SAF10
Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
Late
The SAA made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the reduction of airspace infringements. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.
31/12/2015
REG (By:12/2011)
The SAA made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the reduction of airspace infringements. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.
Late
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2011) The action plan approved by the DG of UkSATSE is implemented.
Registration
facilities
Completed
31/12/2013
MIL (By:12/2011)
There are some specific procedures in place but not fully compliant with ECTL DOC.
Not Applicable
‐
SAF11
Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018
No Plan
Objective is under review. ‐ REG (By:01/2018) Objective is under review
No Plan
‐
ASP (By:12/2014)
The ANSP related recommendations of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions were analyzed and assessed. On the base of the work performed it should be noted that part of the proposed recommendations, which would be relevant for UkSATSE, are already implemented within the UkSATSE‐s projects initiated before SAF 11 was approved. Some of recommendations were implemented as a practice which is used at the permanent basis.
No Plan
‐
APO (By:12/2014) Objective is under review
No Plan
‐
SRC‐RLMK
Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs) Timescales: Entry into force of ESARR 3: 01/07/2000 Entry into force of ESARR 2: 01/11/2000 Entry into force of ESARR 4: 01/04/2001 Entry into force of ESARR 5: 01/04/2002 Entry into force of ESARR 6: 01/11/2003 Entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 550/2004: 20/04/2004 Entry into force of ESARR 1: 01/11/2004 Entry into force of Commission regulation (EC) No 1315/2007 repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011: 09/11/2007 Objective Implementation completion date: 31/12/2010
Late
The 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 ESARRs are fully implemented at the level of regulations. The second edition of "The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System" was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010). For ESARR 5, complementary national rules are still being drafted and foreseen to be ready by the end of 2015
31/12/2015
REG (By:12/2010)
The 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 ESARRs are fully implemented at the level of regulations. The second edition of "The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System" was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010). For ESARR 5, complementary national rules are still being drafted and foreseen to be ready by the end of 2015.
Late
31/12/2015
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 60 Released Issue
SRC‐SLRD
Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies Timescales: Entry into force of ESARR1: 01/11/2004 Entry into force of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1315/2007 repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011: 09/11/2007 Objective Implementation completion date: 31/12/2010
Late
The acceptable level of safety and process of its constant review are established by SAA ("Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" dated 31/05/2010 N 320). The Air Code was approved by the Ukrainian Parliament with establishment of the main principles of Just Culture. It is expected implementation of the new Rules for aircraft accidents and incidents investigation. The list of occurrences to be reported and investigated was updated by the SAA in accordance with Air Code requirements.
31/12/2015
REG (By:12/2010)
The acceptable level of safety and process of its constant review are established by SAA ("Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" dated 31/05/2010 N 320). The Air Code was approved by the Ukrainian Parliament with establishment of the main principles of Just Culture.
Late
31/12/2015
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 61 Released Issue
Annexes
Annex A –Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process
LSSIP Co-ordination
LSSIP Focal Point for Ukraine UkSATSE Ruslan HUTSAN
LSSIP Focal Point for SAAU SAAU Alina ZADOROZHNIA
LSSIP Focal Point for MoD Ukrainian Air Force Command
LSSIP Focal Point for UkSATSE ANSP (UkSATSE) Serhii PEREVEZENTSEV
LSSIP Focal Point for Kyiv Boryspil Airport
Kyiv Boryspil Airport Mykola SAVOSTIANOV
LSSIP Contact Person for Ukraine EUROCONTROL Ana Paula FRANGOLHO
ESSIP Objective Implementation
ESSIP Objective
EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator
National Stakeholder Specialist(s)
AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI (E. REUBER till 02/2015)
A. DYBOWSKA REG- Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr GNATIUK (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI
A. DYBOWSKA ASP - Oleksandr GNATIUK (UkSATSE) MIL- Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
AOM21
R. BUCUROIU
A. DYBOWSKA REG- Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr GNATIUK (UkSATSE)
MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
AOP03
T. LICU
P. VRANJKOVIC REG -Gregoriy GOLODNYAK (SAA) AOP -Mykola SAVOSTIANOV(Kyiv Boryspil Airport) ASP- Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE)
AOP04.1
P. ADAMSON
P. VRANJKOVIC REG - Gregoriy GOLODNYAK (SAA) AOP -Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport) ASP -Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL –Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)
AOP04.2
P. ADAMSON
P. VRANJKOVIC REG - Gregoriy GOLODNYAK (SAA) AOP - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport) ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE)
AOP05
P. ADAMSON
P. VRANJKOVIC AOP - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport) ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)
ATC02.2
B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI
I. FEIJT REG – Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)
ATC02.5
B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI
I. FEIJT REG - Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE) MIL - PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD)
ATC02.6
B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI
I. FEIJT REG -Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE) MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)
ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI
I. FEIJT REG - Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP – Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 62 Released Issue
ESSIP Objective
EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator
National Stakeholder Specialist(s)
MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)
ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)
ATC12 P. TERZIOSKI
L. DELL’ORTO REG Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)
ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI
L. DELL’ORTO REG - Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP- Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)
ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI
L. DELL’ORTO REG- Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)
ATC17 S. MORTON
L. DELL’ORTO REG -Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)
COM09
L. POPESCU
O. ALFARO REG- Roman LUKIIANCHUK ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU
A. KOKONA ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
COM11
L. POPESCU
A. KOKONA REG- Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
ENV01
C. FABER B. HILL APO – Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil
Airport) ASP - Vasyl LUHVISHCHYK (UkSATSE)
ENV02
S. MAHONY, A. WATT
B. HILL APO – Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport) ASP - Vasyl LUHVISHCHYK (UkSATSE) MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)
FCM01 H. KOOLEN
O. CIOARA ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
FCM03 S. SMIDT
O. CIOARA ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
FCM04
M. RICHARD
O. CIOARA REG - (SAAU) ASP Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
FCM05
P. MATERN
O. CIOARA REG - (SAAU) ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL – Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD) APO - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)
INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO ASP - Sergii Tkach (UkSATSE) MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)
INF07
A. PETROVSKY
A-P. FRANGOLHO REG – Oleksandr KAMASHAEV (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL – PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD) APO - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)
ITY-ACID
A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU)
ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD)
ITY-ADQ
M. UNTERREINER
A-P. FRANGOLHO REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL – PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD) APO - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)
ITY-AGDL
S. DISSING
A. KOKONA REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD)
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 63 Released Issue
ESSIP Objective
EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator
National Stakeholder Specialist(s)
ITY-AGVCS2
J. POUZET
O. ALFARO REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD)
ITY-COTR S. MORTON
L. DELL’ORTO REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE)
ITY-FMTP
L. POPESCU
O. ALFARO REG – Vasiliy KAMASHAEV (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL – PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD) APO - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)
ITY-SPI
M. BORELY, R. STEWART
O. CIOARA REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)
NAV03
F. PAVLICEVIC
A. KOKONA REG - Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Pavlo KUD` (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
NAV10
R. FARNWORTH
A. KOKONA REG –Oleksandr KAMASHAEV (SAAU) ASP - Pavlo KUD` (UkSATSE) MIL – Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD) APO -Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)
SAF10
T. LICU
I. FEIJT REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU) ASP - Vitaliy BEZMAL (UkSATSE) (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
SAF11
S. LAWRENCE
I. FEIJT REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU) ASP - Vitaliy BEZMAL (UkSATSE) (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
SRC-RLMK M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
SRC-SLRD M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 64 Released Issue
Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation 1. The Structure of the SAAU (the main function areas)
Address of SAAU:
Peremogy Av. 14, Kyiv, 01135, Ukraine
Tel.: (+38 044) 351 54 01
Fax: (+38 044) 35156 92
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.avia.gov.ua
Chairman
Senior Deputy
Chairman
Deputy Chairman
Aerodromes and Airports Department
Air Navigation Directorate
Flight Coordination
Unit
International Cooperation
and European
Integration Department
Aircraft Type Certification Department
Aircraft Continuing Airworthi-
ness Department
Airworthiness Directorate
Sector for the documenta-
tion provision
Aviation Medici-
ne
Standardiza-tion, interna
audit and internationa
projects coordination
Unit
Risk Manage-
ment Unit
Flight Operations Department
Personnel Certification Department
Regional Inspections Department
Flight Operations Directorate
Sector of regulation of
the dangerous
cargo
Special Sector
Administrative Department
Personnel Department
Legal Unit
Aviation Security
Directorate
Financial and Economical Directorate
Sector for the
corruption prevention
and detection
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 65 Released Issue
2. The organisation chart ofUkSATSE:
UkSATSE comprises:
- The UkSATSE Head Office (Air Navigation, CNS, Administration, Economics and Finance, Engineering Departments) is locatedat airport Kyiv (Boryspil’);
- Six regional branches of UkSATSE (RB of UkSATSE) located at airports: Simferopol’, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Dnipropetrovs’k, L’viv, Odesa and Kharkiv .
- UkSATSE Flight Calibration Service: aircrafts performing calibration checks of navigation equipment for UkSATSE, as well as for other entities in neighbouring States;
- UKRAEROCENTRE: Ukrainian Airspace Management and Planning Centre – the Head Unit of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System (situated in RB of UkSATSE “Kyivcentraero”);
- AIS: Aeronautical Information Services of UkSATSE is located at airport Kyiv (Boryspil’); - TCC of UkSATSE: Training and Certification Centre of UkSATSE for air traffic controllers and
maintenance technicians (situated near UkSATSE Head office).
Address of UkSATSE Head office:
Airport, Boryspil’, Kyiv region, 08307, Ukraine
Telephone: (+38 044) 235 21 10
Fax: (+38 044) 281 84 84
AFTN: UKKRDUXX
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.uksatse.ua
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 66 Released Issue
3. The organisation chart ofAir Navigation Service Department of UkSATSE
LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 67 Released Issue
Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations
ESRA EUROCONTROL Statistical Reference Area
IAIP Integrated Aeronautical Information Package
MoD Ministry of Defence of Ukraine
MoTC Ministry of Transport and Communications of Ukraine
MoI Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine
RAIM Regional Aeronautical Information Management
SAAU State Aviation Administration of Ukraine
UKRAEROCENTER Ukrainian Airspace Management and Planning Centre
UkSATSE Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise