Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LCLS-II Capabilities & Overview LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop
Tor Raubenheimer
February 9th, 2015
Outline
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
1. Overall machine goals and layout
2. Primary parameters
• Nominal X-ray wavelength and pulse energy curves
• X-ray power
• Bunch charge versus X-ray length
• Timing and energy stability
3. Simulations of performance
4. Future enhancements
Talk largely consists of slides extracted from recent LCLS-II
reviews and much more information can be found there.
2
LCLS-II Concept CW linac based on SCRF technology to complement LCLS CuRF
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
SCRF offers advantages in
terms of X-ray power,
stability, and repetition rate
Challenge is cost for high
energy CW accelerator and achieving comparable peak
brighness
LCLS-II will benefit from best of both CuRF and SCRF
• Use CuRF for high peak brightness at short wavelengths
• Use SCRF for very high average brightness with stable beam
and uniform bunch spacing
3
LCLS-II 1.3 GHz Cryomodule Similar to EuFEL but modified for CW operation
Total length ~12.2 m Nearly the final LCLS-II cryomodule design
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Cryomodules will be similar to EuXFEL with modifications for
CW operation; cavities will be processed for high Q0 operation
Baseline 16 MV/m with Q0 = 2.7x1010
CM allows 150 Watts max cooling
20 MV/m max gradient @ 2.7x1010
or 16 MV/m @ 1.8x1010
4
LCLS-II Concept Use 1st km of SLAC linac for CW SCRF linac
5 LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
with space for 7 GeV
Revised LCLS-II (Phase II) Baseline Deliverables
Self seeding between 1.2-4 keV
requires x-ray optics development
Self seeding at high rep rate above
4keV will require ~4.5 GeV electron
beam, not a baseline deliverable
today
Cu Self Seeded
High Rep Rate SASE
Self Seeded (Grating)
Cu SASE
Photon Energy (keV)
0 5 10 15 20 25
SC Linac High Rep Rate
Cu Linac
Legend
4.0 GeV
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015 6
LCLS-II Accelerator Layout New Superconducting Linac LCLS Undulator Hall
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• Two sources: high rate SCRF linac and 120 Hz Cu LCLS-I linac
• North and South undulators can operate simultaneously in any mode
Undulator SC Linac (up to 1 MHz) Cu Linac (up to 120Hz)
North
0.20 - 1.3 keV
South
1.0 - 5.0 keV
up to 25 keV
higher peak power pulses
• Concurrent operation of 1-5 keV and 5-25 keV is not possible
HXU
SXU Sec. 21-30 Sec. 11-20
0.2-1.3 keV (0 -1 MHz)
SCRF
4 GeV 1-25 keV (120 Hz) 1-5 keV (0 -1 MHz)
LCLS-I Linac 2.5-15 GeV
proposed FACET-II LCLS-II Linac
7
FEL X-ray Performance
LCLS-II FAC Review, February 5-6, 2015
SCRF linac can deliver ~1 MHz beam to either undulator
• Undulators limited to 120 kW electron beam power
• 100 pC at 300 kHz and 4 GeV or 33 pC at 900 kHz and 4 GeV
• Goal is to provide >20 Watts in SASE over wavelength range
of 0.2 to 5 keV to experiments with good mirror figure
- X-ray Transport is designed to handle up to 200 Watts
- Maximum X-ray pulse energy is function of X-ray wavelength,
e.g. 0.9 mJ at 200 eV; 1 mJ at 1 keV; 20 uJ at 5 keV
• Soft X-ray self-seeding will provide narrower bandwidth with
pulses a few times transform-limit
CuRF linac will deliver LCLS-like bunches and mJ-scale
SASE X-ray pulses to >25 keV
8
9
Possible Operating Modes Very flexible operation
Configuration Linac Parameters SXR HXR
High rate to SXR and
HXR
SCRF: 4 GeV, 0.929 MHz; 60 pC
CuRF: off
50-200 W at 1 keV
(120-450 uJ at 460 kHz) 20 W at 3 keV
(43 uJ at 460 kHz)
High rate to SXR and
medium pulse energy
at HXR
SCRF: 4 GeV, 0.240 MHz; 100 pC
CuRF: off
80-200 W at 250 eV
(350-900 uJ at 210 kHz) 20 W at 1.5 keV (1 mJ at 20 kHz)
Medium rate and
pulse energy at SXR
and HXR
SCRF: 4 GeV, 0.080 MHz; 100 pC
CuRF: off
20 W at 500 eV
(1 mJ at 20 kHz) 20 W at 4 keV
(0.4 mJ at 50 kHz)
High rate to SXR and
high pulse energy at
HXR
SCRF: 4 GeV, 0.410 MHz; 100 pC
CuRF: 15 GeV, 120 Hz, 130 pC
200 W at 250 eV
(500 uJ at 400 kHz) 0.5 W at 3 keV
(4 mJ at 120 Hz)
High rate to SXR and
short wavelength at
HXR
SCRF: 4 GeV, 0.929 MHz; 30 pC
CuRF: 15 GeV, 120 Hz, 130 pC
50 - 200 W at 1.2 keV
(50-200 uJ at 920 kHz) 0.1 W at 25 keV
(500 uJ at 120 Hz)
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
CuRF Linac Driven X-ray Pulse Energy
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015 H-D Nuhn 10
X-ray Pulse Energy from SXR and HXR driven by SCRF Analytic estimates vs. simulation results
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015 G. Marcus
SC linac + SXR 100 pC, ~50 fs FWHM
300 kHz, 4 GeV SC linac + HXR
100 pC, ~50 fs FWHM
300 kHz, 4 GeV
SXR 3w (approximate)
HXR 3w (approximate)
103 104
10-5
10-4
10-3
Photon Energy (eV)
Ener
gy/p
uls
e (J
)
102
20 pC e-beam
20 fs FWHM
11
12
Example: 100 pC IMPACT, HXR SASE, Eγ = 2 keV
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 14010
-4
10-2
100
102
104
2 keV, energy [J]
z [m]
E [
J]
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
10
20
30
40
s [m]
P [
GW
]
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
1
2
3
4
I [k
A]Emax ~ 655 μJ
Pavg ~ 10 GW
Δt = 58 fs
Example: 20 pC IMPACT, HXR SASE, Eγ = 5 keV
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
0 50 100 15010
-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
z [m]
E [
J]
No taper
Taper
0 5 10 15 200
0.5
1
1.5
2
s [m]
P [
GW
]
0 5 10 15 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
I [k
A]
4975 4980 4985 4990 4995 50000
2
4
6
8
10
12x 10
11
E [eV]
P(w
) [a
.u.]
ENT ~ 8 μJ
ET ~ 25 μJ
Δt ~ 18 fs
ΔEγ,FWHM ~ 2.1 eV
ΔEγ,FWHM/E0 ~ 4.2 x 10-4
13
Example: 100 pC IMPACT, SXR SS, Eγ = 500 eV,
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
0 20 40 60 8010
-4
10-2
100
102
z [m]
E [
J]
E ~ 113 μJ after 9
downstream undulator
sections
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
2
4
6
8
10
s [m]
P [
GW
]
Δtmean ~ 20 fs
490 495 500 5050
1
2
3
4
5
6x 10
12
E [eV]
#/
eV
ΔEγ,FWHM ~ 0.22 eV
ΔEγ,FWHM/E0 ~ 4.4 x 10-4
14
5 more undulator segments for
post-saturation taper if desired
Working to
understand
pedestal
Bunch Charge and Pulse Length Charge and rate determined by 120 kW limit
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
LCLS-II baseline will deliver same beam parameters to both
undulators
- Specified to operate with 10 – 300 pC bunch charge @ <120 kW
- 100 pC with 60 fs FWHM; 20 pC with 20 fs FWHM
Baseline is 100 pC per bunch with roughly 60 fs FWHM X-ray
pulse length (1 kA) at 300 kHz (120 kW)
- Working on techniques to shorten X-ray pulse without changing
charge or chirp etc – how rapidly are changes desired?
- Pulse energy simply proportional to pulse length
Low charge options include 10 and 20 pC at up to 929 kHz
- Better performance (pulse energy/bunch charge)
15
Nonlinear Harmonic Generation and Harmonic Lasing
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• Nonlinear harmonic generation produces third harmonic
radiation at ~1% of the fundamental when K>1.5
• Harmonic lasing can produce significant radiation with a
narrow spectrum when the fundamental is suppressed
- Investigating options for harmonic lasing
- Should be reasonable to upgrade HXR undulator if needed
Fundamental 2 keV 3 keV
Bunch charge 100 pC 20 pC
3rd harmonic 6 keV 9 keV
Efficiency 1% 0.75%
Energy/pulse 1 uJ 0.14 uJ
16
Stability Goals
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• LCLS-II SCRF FEL will be more stable than LCLS
• Baseline specs for electron beam:
- DE/E < 0.01% rms
- DI/I < 4% rms
- Dt < 20 fs rms
- DX/sX, DY/sY < 15% rms
• LLRF has been specified to provide stability in ‘worst’ case
of correlated errors
• X-ray pulse has added intensity jitter from SASE and optics
• MHz beam rate should allow further stabilization with
addition of fast feedback systems
17
Longer-Term Goals Can Provide Exceptional Stability
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
ENERGY
PEAK
CURRENT
ARRIVAL
TIME
Now simulate the best case:
0.01% and 0.01 deg rms jitter
and all uncorrelated Energy stable to 0.003% rms
Peak current stable to 1.8%
Timing stable to 5 fs
* The gun timing error is compressed by 3.85 from gun to 100 MeV, due
to velocity compression.
Best Case Jitter Simulations in LiTrack
See PRD: LCLSII-2.4-PR-0041
P. Emma 18
Parameter Range for: Timing
Parameter Name
(Unit)
Ready for First
Light
Possible within
the first year or
two of operation
It could happen –
don’t laugh
Short term laser
vs X-ray jitter
<100 fs RMS* <50 fs RMS
10 fs RMS
probably the limit
X-ray vs laser 1-
day drift
1 ps 100 fs 10 fs with pulsed
fiber locking
X-ray / optical
cross correlator**
Probably not
ready
10-50 fs 10 fs
LCLS_I to
LCLS_II jitter
200 fs RMS 100 fs RMS 100 fs RMS
*Assuming full performance LLRF system for the accelerator
** if applicable for beam operating conditions
J. Frisch, July 31, LCLS-II Parameters Review
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015 19
LCLS-II Planned Undulator Layout Replace Existing LCLS Undulator with HXR and add SXR
32 HXU Segments
Existing Diamond Crystal
Self-Seeding System
New SXR Self-Seeding
System for High Power Loads
21 SXU Segments
Space for future upgrades? Space for polarization
upgrade?
Considering vertical polarization of X-rays from HXR line
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Enhanced Modes of operation (G. Marcus, July 31, LCLS-II Parameters Review)
• High rep-rate HXR SS
• External seeding
• HGHG
• EEHG
• ?SASE
• iSASE
• pSASE
• Harmonic Lasing
• Two-Color
• Split undulator and gain modulation
• Two-bunches
• FWM via selective amplification
• Short pulses
• low charge, beam spoiling, laser modulation, self-seeding / chirp
• Timing control
• Defined by laser
• Easy to adjust pulse duration
• Improved stability in photon energy and #
• Possibly near transform limited pulses
• Increase cooperation length
• Narrow spectrum
• Extend tuning range of FEL beamline
• X-ray pump & probe
• Four-wave mixing
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Option for complete HXR self-seeding monochromator Possible layout options not fully explored
• Two-stage diamond wake-field monochromator seeding sections and a grating
monochromator seeding section
• Seeding below 3 keV • Both diamond systems are retracted
• Seeding above 3 keV • Grating system is retracted
• Between 3 – 5 keV • Both diamond monochromators in use using (111) crystals
• Above 5 keV with CuRF linac • Only 2nd diamond mono. in use with (400) crystal
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015 22
Summary
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• Broad capability
- High rate beam from 0.20 – 5 keV with >20 W X-ray power
- High intensity pulses with LCLS charactistics to >25 keV
• SCRF linac will provide >10x better stability than CuRF
- How best to take advantage of benefits?
- What else is needed?
• Variable gap udulators allow flexible operation
- Broad bandwidth coverage; Strong tapering; Rapid wavelength scans
• Broad spectrum of upgrade options
- LCLS is pioneering many techniques that may be implemented in LCLS-II
• Please suggest your X-ray goals
- Opportunity to modify development plans but need strong science case
23
BACKUP
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Must Use Gas Based Techniques for SXR
• Design concept similar to LCLS-I gas attenuator, but
- Using Ar gas, 5 m long volume, up to 10 torr
- Differential pumping w/ 1st variable (impedance) apertures to reduce
conductance (beam size ~ 10 mm at 200 eV at location)
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Impact of Intensity Fluctuations on Gas Attenuator Beam drills hole through gas
Intensity fluctuation induced inaccuracy in attenuation ~ 10%
T (
K)
Att
n A
ch
ieve
d
Intensity fluctuation induced baseline temperature variation ~ 200 °K
Operating pressure ~ 2.5 torr, effective attenuation 5x10-4 ~ absorbed 200 W into gas detector
Y. Feng LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
LCLS-II (SCRF) Baseline Parameters
Parameter symbol nominal range units
Electron Energy Ef 4.0 2.0 - 4.14 GeV
Bunch Charge Qb 100 10 - 300 pC
Bunch Repetition Rate in Linac fb 0.62 0 - 0.93 MHz
Average e- current in linac Iavg 0.062 0.0 - 0.3 mA
Avg. e- beam power at linac end Pav 0.25 0 - 1.2 MW
Norm. rms slice emittance at undulator e-s 0.45 0.2 - 0.7 m
Final peak current (at undulator) Ipk 1000 500 - 1500 A
Final slice E-spread (rms, w/heater) sEs 500 125 - 1500 keV
Final bunch length (rms) tb 8.5 3 - 50 m
Avg. CW RF gradient (powered cavities) Eacc 16 - MV/m
Photon pulse length (FWHM) txray 70 10 - 350 fs
Photon energy range of SXR (SCRF) Ephot - 0.2 - 1.3 keV
Photon energy range of HXR (SCRF) Ephot - 1 - 5 keV
Photon energy range of HXR (Cu-RF) Ephot - 1 - 25 keV
See LCLSII-1.1-PR-0133
External seeding modes
UV
seeds
radiator mod1
mod2
UV
seed
fresh
bunch
delay
mod1 rad1 mod2 rad2
EEHG
HGHG
9 fs rms
0.22 eV rms
16 fs rms 0.12 eV rms
~ 2 x transform limit
• Allows long coherent pulses
• Highly sensitive to laser quality, less so to electron bunch
• Highly sensitive to electron
bunch parameters
• Consistently poor spectrum
• QHG (with reviewers) relax
conditions on harmonic jumps
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
External seeding performance and requirements
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• EEHG
• Performance
- Long, coherent pulses
- Near Fourier transform limit (~ 2x FTL @ 1nm)
• Requirements
- Stable (amplitude and phase) laser @ 260 nm
- 2 chicanes and 2 modulators
• HGHG
• Performance
- Best for short pulses
- Hard to control spectrum
- Below 2 nm is pushing limits
• Requirements
- 3 chicanes (one for fresh bunch), 2 modulators, intermediate radiator
- 260 nm laser
Harmonic lasing using 100 pC, 1 kA e-beam slice
properties
0 50 100 15010
2
104
106
108
1010
z [m]
P [
W]
Ideal beam comparison
5 keV @ fund.
5 keV @ 3rd
harm.
Additional phase shifters needed
0 50 100 15010
2
103
104
105
106
107
108
z [m]
P [
W]
7 keV
6-7 keV photons become possible
with attenuators
• Tune first undulators such that 3rd
harmonic at desired wavelength
• Tune second undulators such that 5th
harmonic is at desired wavelength and
equal to 3rd upstream
0 20 40 60 80 100 12010
0
102
104
106
108
1010
z [m]
P [
W]
E,f
~ 4.1 keV
1.38 keV
4.1 keV
0.83 keV
2.5 keV
4.1 keV
Pavg ~ 200 MW
HXR
SXR
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Two-color generation: Some recent LCLS results
• Split undulator scheme
• Gain modulation
l1,2 = lw1+K1,2
2
2g 2
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Two-color generation: Two-bunch xFEL demonstrated
at LCLS
Photocathode Laser Pulse
Adjustable delay stage
Double Pulse
Electron Gun
Linac
Few ps delay
Bunch Compressor 1
Bunch Compressor 2
Few fs delay
~1% energy separation
UNDULATOR
time time
Energ
y
Energ
y
2-color
X-Rays
Splitter
l1,2 = lw1+K 2
2g 2
1,2
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
FEL for FWM
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• Control of
• Timing
• Color
• Angle of incidence
• Large bandwidth, coherent short (~1-2
fs) pulses
• Can be further compressed (~0.5
fs)
• Many additional components and
significant R&D required
• Easily fits in SXR tunnel
Ferrite Loaded Transmission Line Kicker Hardware testing has begun
• Loaded sections of ferrite and discrete capacitors
simulate a transmission line.
• 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 =𝐿𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙×𝐼
𝑉 where we will have 3
separate kickers for 1/3 fill time ~100ns.
Recent measurements (7 out of 23)
Individual magnets
Integrated kick
T. Beukers
Test Pulser Schematic of 1m kicker
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Two-color performance and requirements
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• Split undulator/gain modulation
• Performance - Peak power 5-10 x lower for both colors
- Different source points
- Only up to ~ 2.5 keV on HXR due to long saturation lengths
• Requirements - Chicane (SXR)
• Two bunch
• Performance - Both colors achieve saturation
- Smaller photon tunability due to chromatic effects in transport, on order of 1-2%
• Requirements - Beam splitter for photocathode laser
• FEL for FWM
• Performance - Short pulses
- Large bandwidth
- Flexibility in timing, photon energy, angle of incidence
• Requirements - Two modulators, four small chicanes, single-cycle mid IR laser, beam splitter, delay stages
Parameter Sensitivities
SXR is robust at 1.25 keV; HXR is limited at 5 keV
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015 H-D Nuhn
Using LCLS to Benchmark IMPACT S-2-E Simulations uBI effects will be important
LCLS microbunching studies: 4GeV, 180pC, 1kA
Measured final t-p phase space vs laser heater preliminary analysis of bunching factor
D. Ratner, Y. Ding, et al. LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
LCLS-II Layout (P. Emma, LCLS-II FAC Review)
L2-Linac L3-Linac
HXU
SXU
Sec. 21-30
LH BC1 BC2
BC3
D2
D10
-wall
0.65 m 0.93 m
2.50 m
L1
kicker LTUH
LTUS
“glowing” sections indicate these are not in the vertical plane of either linac
LCLS-I
Linac
See PRD: LCLSII-2.5-PR-0134
(plan view - not to scale) N
ew
SC
RF
Lin
ac (
4 G
eV
)
Byp
ass
Lin
e
1s
t D
og
Leg
LT
U
Tra
nsp
ort
un
du
lato
rs
Beam
Sp
read
er
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February
9-13, 2015
Solid-State Amplifiers Simplify LLRF and offer better performance
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• Installing
3.8 kW SSA
• Need 2.6 kW
with no f offset
or overhead
• Need 3.8 kW
with 10 Hz
-phonic offsets,
6% overhead for losses and 10 % tuning overhead
- Same power allows operation at ~ 50% duty with 60 uA at 23
MV/m with 3 Hz max detuning, QL = 6e7 and the same overheads
Linac
Sec.
V0
(MV)
j
(deg)
Acc.
Grad.*
(MV/m)
No.
Cryo
Mod’s
No.
Avail.
Cav’s
Spare
Cav’s
Cav’s
per
Amp.
L0 100 varies 16.3 1 8 1 1
L1 211 -12.7 13.6 2 16 1 1
HL -64.7 -150 12.5 2 16 1 1
L2 1446 -21.0 15.5 12 96 6 1
L3 2206 0 15.7 18 144 9 1
Lf 202 ±34 15.7 2 16 1 1
HXU
SXU Sec. 21-30 Sec. 11-20
0.2-1.3 keV (0.1-1 MHz)
SCRF
4 GeV 1-25 keV (120 Hz) 1-5 keV (0.1-1 MHz)
LCLS-I Linac 2.5-15 GeV
proposed FACET-II LCLS-II Linac
High Level Photon Parameters Table 2 from Bill Schlotter’s LCLS-II Introduction document
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Undulator Uni
ts SXR HXR
Linac SC SC Cu
Photon Energy ke
V 0.25-1.25 1-5 >5 1-25
Max Repetition
Rate kH
z 1000 1000 .12
Max Pulse Energy mJ 1.9-1.6 2.3-1.9 2.3-0.1 0.2 4.2-1.4 10-3.3
Max Power in
FEE W 200 200 1.2-0.4
Max Power to
End Station W 20 20 0.4
FWHM Pulse
Duration fs 70 fs
@100 pC 10 fs
@10 pC 70 fs
@100 pC 10 fs
@ 10 pC 25 fs
@100 pC
Tracking a 100, 300, and 20 pC Bunch Charge (with CSR, long. wakes, and separate injector runs – ASTRA & Elegant)
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Q = 100 pC ex=0.350.42 m (20%)
heater = 5.5 keV rms
jL1 = -12.7 deg
V3.9 = 64.7 MV
j3.9 = -150 deg
R56-BC2 = -37.0 mm
Q = 300 pC ex=0.610.77 m (26%)
heater = 11 keV rms
jL1 = -14.0 deg
V3.9 = 58.0 MV
j3.9 = -150 deg
R56-BC2 = -36.7 mm
Q = 20 pC ex=0.090.13 m (44%)
heater = 2.0 keV rms
jL1 = -21.0 deg
V3.9 = 55 MV
j3.9 = -165 deg
R56-BC2 = -62 mm
0.6 kA L. Wang
HXR Components
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
SXR Device Symbol HXR
Count Notes
Adjustable Aperture type 1 1 New Design
Adjustable Aperture type 2 (mirror Slits) 1 Similar to LUSI
Attenuators (Gas and Solid) 1 Modifications to the existing Gas attenuator
New solid attenuator Design based on LUSI
Flat Mirror 2
No upgrades to the existing HOMS mirrors
New HOMS mirrors to cover SC energy range
Gas Energy Monitor 2 Repurposed with upgrades
High Resolution Imager 3 New design based on LUSI
In line Spectrometer 1 Repurpose existing
Mono 1 Repurpose existing
Rapid Turnaround Diagnostics Station 1 Repurpose existing
Stopper 1 New design SB
SB
PH
OT
ON
BE
AM
ST
OP
PE
R
M2H
(N
)
MIR
RO
R
IMA
GE
R
HO
MS
1 (
E)
MIR
RO
R
IMA
GE
R
AD
J
AP
ER
GA
S
MO
NIT
OR
GA
S
MO
NIT
OR
AD
J
AP
ER
RA
PID
DIA
GN
OS
TIC
CH
AM
BE
R
SP
EC
TR
OM
ET
ER
UN
DU
LA
TO
R
CE
NT
ER S
HA
DO
W
WA
LL
(E
)
K-M
ON
O
SO
LID
AT
TE
N
IMA
GE
R
GA
S A
TT
EN
M1
H (
N)
MIR
RO
R
HO
MS
2 (
E)
MIR
RO
R
XR
T &
FE
H
DU
MP
WA
LL
NE
H W
AL
L
TH
ER
MA
L B
AR
RIE
R
WA
LL
DU
MP
AR
EA
FE
E
AR
EA
NE
H
AR
EA
FE
E W
AL
L
HU
TC
H 1
AR
EA
Beam Direction
SXR Components
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
SXR Device Symbol SXR count Notes
Adjustable Aperture type 1 1 New Design
Adjustable Aperture type 2 (mirror Slits) 1 Similar to LUSI
Attenuator (Gas) 1 New Gas attenuator, design similar to LCLS-I
Flat Mirror 2 New System: very low figure error, water cooled
Gas Energy Monitors 2 One repurposed system with upgrades, one new
system with similar design to LCLS-I system
High Resolution Imager 4 New System, design borrows elements from LUSI
K-B mirrors 1 New System: Bender design leveraged on CXI
system
Rapid Turnaround Diagnostics Station 1 New System, use LCLS-I design
Stopper 1 New Design SB
SBA
DJ
AP
ER
TU
RE
1G
AS
AT
TE
NU
AT
OR
RA
PID
DIA
GN
OS
TIC
IMA
GE
R
AD
J
AP
ER
TU
RE
2
IMA
GE
R
M1S
1 M
IRR
OR
SH
IELD
ING
WA
LL
M2S
1 M
IRR
OR
DU
MP
AR
EA
FE
E A
RE
A
BE
AM
ST
OP
PE
R
GA
S E
NE
RG
Y M
ON
ITO
R
IMA
GE
R AR
RIV
AL
TIM
E
WA
VE
FR
ON
T
GA
S M
ON
ITO
R
CE
NT
ER
UN
DU
LAT
OR
DU
MP
WA
LL
IMA
GE
R
FE
E W
ALL
KB
M1
HO
RIZ
ON
TA
L
KB
MIR
RO
R
EN
D S
TA
TIO
N 1
KB
M1-
VE
RT
ICA
L
KB
MIR
RO
R
TH
ER
MA
L W
ALL
NE
H
HU
TC
H-1
LCLS
Operations
Verify RF Stability Tolerances by Tracking (P. Emma, LCLS-II FAC Review)
* The gun timing error is compressed by 3.85 from gun to 100 MeV, due to velocity compression.
PEAK
CURRENT
(<4%)
ARRIVAL
TIME
(<20 fs)
ENERGY
(<0.01%)
Jitter Simulations in LiTrack
(DE/E0)rms =
0.008%
Dtrms =
20 fs
(DIpk/Ipk)rms =
3.8%
Now verify by tracking 1000 times with random jitter
Jitter may be correlated or uncorrelated (cav. to cav.)
Include bunch charge, gun laser, & chicane supplies
uncorrelated rms
jitter tols per cavity
if jitter is correlated
(cavity to cavity)
OK
OK
OK
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
200 W Requirement on Photon Beamlines Will have impact but looks achievable
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• Photon beamlines have been speced to operate at 20 W
with good figure performance and 200 W
• The FEL’s can deliver >200W over much of photon range
• The 200 W requirement is to provide headroom in
operations and to allow for harmonics, …
• 200 W requirement impacts stoppers, attenuators, and
photon diagnostics
• Most issues have been resolved with small impact
• Some new challenges have been uncovered
100 pC, 1 kA: SXR SS simulation results @ Eγ = 1.24
keV – typical run
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
0 20 40 60 8010
-4
10-2
100
102
104
z [m]
E [
J]
Energy gain curve
E ~ 1.5 μJ
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2Power (blue), Current (green)
s [m]
P [
GW
]
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
0.5
1
1.5
2
I [k
A]
1230 1235 1240 1245 12500
2
4
6
8x 10
9
E [eV]
#
/eV
[N
]
Spectrum (blue), Filter (red)
1230 1235 1240 1245 12500
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
E ~ 200 μJ
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
0.5
1
1.5
2x 10
5 Power (blue), Current (green)
s [m]
P [
W]
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
0.5
1
1.5
2
I [k
A]
1238 1239 1240 1241 12420
2
4
6
8
10x 10
7 Spectrum
E [eV]
#
/eV
[N
]
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
5
10
15
20Power (blue), Current (green)
s [m]
P [
GW
]
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
0.5
1
1.5
2
I [k
A]
1238 1239 1240 1241 12420
1
2
3
4
5
6x 10
12 Spectrum
E [eV]
#
/eV
[N
]
ΔEFWHM ~ 64 meV
ΔEFWHM/E0 ~ 5.1 x 10-5
TBP ~ 4.3 eV-fs = 2.4 FTL
Saturation after 16 out of
21 undulators
G. Marcus
FWHM ~ 65 fs
20 pC, 500 A: HXR SASE simulation results @ Eγ = 5.0
keV
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
0 20 40 60 80 100
10-4
10-2
100
102
z [m]
E [
J]
Energy gain curve
0 5 10 15 20 250
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Power (blue), Current (green)
s [m]
P [
GW
]
0 5 10 15 20 250
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
I [k
A]
5000 5005 5010 5015 5020 5025 50300
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5x 10
11 Spectrum
E [eV]
P(w
) [a
.u.]
ΔEFWHM ~ 3.5 eV
ΔEFWHM/E0 ~ 7.0 x 10-4
E ~ 27.4 μJ
Saturation after 24 out of 32 undulators
G. Marcus
FWHM ~ 20 fs
100 pC IMPACT e-beam slice properties, HXR
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
s [m]
E [
GeV
]
0 10 20 30 40 50
3.98
3.99
4
4.01
4.02
0 10 20 30 40 50-40
-20
0
20
40
60
s [m]
- 0
0 10 20 30 40 500
1
2
3
4
5
I [k
A]
0 10 20 30 40 500
0.5
1
s [m]
e n [m
m-m
rad
]
0 10 20 30 40 500
1
2
3
4
5
I [A
]
0 10 20 30 40 500
1
2
s [m]
sE [
MeV
]
0 10 20 30 40 500
1
2
3
4
5
I [A
]
head I ~ 720 A
ϵn,x ~ 0.35 mm-mrad
ϵn,y ~ 0.42 mm-mrad σE ~ 450 keV
SXR shows larger fluctuations here,
but otherwise is comparable
SXR self-seeded geometry (LCLS)
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
1239 1239.5 1240 1240.5-0.2
0
0.2
E [eV]
Am
p
1239 1239.5 1240 1240.5-0.1
0
0.1
Ph
ase
• λu = 39 mm
• Lu = 3.4 (87 per.)
• Lbr = 1.0 (25 per.)
• 7 undulator sections
• U8 removed
• R = 5,000 (FWHM)
• Aiming for R = 10,000
• Gaussian filter
• 2% efficiency
• Will implement optical
propagation that includes
relevant spatio-temporal
couplings
• Full 3D seed
• λu = 39 mm
• Lu = 3.4 (87 per.)
• Lbr = 1.0 (25 per.)
• 14 undulator sections
SS experience with LCLS, measurement and simulation
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• S2E simulations
• ASTRA/ELEGANT/GENESIS
• Phenomenological and wave
optics simulation of mono.
• Shows excellent overall
agreement both in energy and in
spectrum D. Ratner, S. Serkez
20 pC IMPACT e-beam slice properties, HXR
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
s [m]
E [
GeV
]
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
3.995
4
4.005
4.01
4.015
0 10 20 30 40 50 60-10
-5
0
5
10
s [m]
- 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
I [k
A]
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
0.1
0.2
s [m]
e n [m
m-m
rad
]
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
I [A
]
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
1
2
s [m]
sE [
MeV
]
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
I [A
]
head I ~ 350 A
ϵn,x ~ 0.15 mm-mrad
σE ~ 450 keV
Time-dependent S2E parameter scan (very time
consuming), HXR Eγ = 2 keV
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
d
1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
Emax ~ 655 μJ
ξ = 0.03
d = 2.1
ETI ~ 470 μJ
ξ = 0.06
d = 2.15
30% difference in final energy
Pulse length control – emittance spoiling
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• Calculations indicate an emittance spoiler foil can withstand the full beam at
high rep rate
• However, the increased load on the collimators might force operation at a
low(er) rep rate
Dispersed bunch
Y
X
• Energy chirped e-beam has
x-t correlation in region of
high dispersion
• Insert foil with triangular
width to continuously tune
the pulse duration
Emittance spoiling foil measurements at LCLS
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
~100 fs ~6 fs
Y. Ding
Measured foil scan movie at LCLS
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Y. Ding
Pulse length control – differential heating
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• It is fairly easy to put a notch in the laser heater profile
• Here we assume a 1 ps notch but you can get to a few 100 fs with no heroic
efforts…
unspoiled beam
@ heater spoiled beam
@ heater
A. Marinelli
After compression and acceleration (S2E with
ELEGANT, 100 pC)
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
few fs lasing
core
garbage
~6 fs
FWHM
A. Marinelli
LCLS MD shifts will be dedicated to this study in the near future
Self-seeding with a chirped e-beam for short pulses
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
• A chirped e-beam generates a SASE signal
• Monochromator selects a narrow bandwidth and helps to control the seed pulse
duration
• The seed is amplified only over a fraction of the bunch and dominates SASE
• Superradiance can possibly be used to further compress the pulse
SASE undulator Amplifier undulator
K0 K1
λ1 λ1
SXRSS
Y. Ding
chirp SASE BW Mono BW
SASE undulator Amplifier undulator
K0 K1
λ1 λ1
SXRSS
LCLS example
LCLS-II Science Opportunities Workshop, February 9-13, 2015
Power profile Power spectrum
0.14eV 13 fs ~7 fs 0.3eV