29
35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems URL: http://es.aau.dk/staff/lpj WS1 – Introduction to Problem based Learning: The AAU Way PBL as educational model and Practice at Aalborg University •Exercise •PBL Aalborg practice: Teams, Projects and Problems 1

Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

WS1 – Introduction to Problem based Learning: The AAU Way. PBL as educational model and Practice at Aalborg University Exercise PBL Aalborg practice : Teams, Projects and Problems. Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

Lars Peter Jensen

Associated Professor at Automation and Control

Department of Electronic Systems

URL: http://es.aau.dk/staff/lpj

WS1 – Introduction to Problem based Learning: The AAU Way

PBL as educational model and Practice at Aalborg University

•Exercise •PBL Aalborg practice:

• Teams, Projects and Problems

1

Page 2: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

PBL Aalborg Practice What are the key characteristics?

2

Page 3: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

PBL Aalborg Practice

Three main characteristics • Problem • Project • Team work

Examples mainly from Engineering

3

Page 4: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

PBL Aalborg Model: Principles of Project-organized problem-solving Learning

Problem Solving

Problem analysis

Report/documentation

Literature Lecture Group studies

Tutorials Field studies Experiments

‘The Aalborg Experiment – project innovation in university education’ - Kjaersdam & Enemark (1994)

4

Page 5: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

• Problems – question – wondering within a frame

• a project each semester (1. year)• each group has a group room• group size of 6-8 students first year,

2-3 students the last year• each group has at least one

supervisor• self selected group and projects

within themes and disciplines• group examination with individual

marking

Lectures8:15-10:00

Lecture-relatedAssignment 10:15-12:00

Supervision -initiated & arranged by

studentsDoing project

In groups

PBL Aalborg Model - practice

5

Page 6: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

Method

Semester

Collaborationmethod/

Method of project

work/learning

Discipline learning

Metods used in industry

and institutions

Scientific method

1 - 2

3 - 6

7 - 8

9 - 10

Development of different Competences through the study

6

Page 7: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

Team work

What ?• A group of students working together on a

project• They have to both carry out the project and

document the results• Based on the documentation an oral

individual examination is held. Before the examination the group presents the project

7

Page 8: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

Team workWhy ?• A survey in 1997 showed that 75% of the companies

wanted new employees to have good skills in team work

• Most engineers work in teams• The individual student in the group learns from the

others (peer learning)• Responsibility towards the group leads to very hard

work• Group members provide social support, thus lower

drop-out rate8

Page 9: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

Team workHow ?• Each group has a group room• Group size of 6-8 students first year, 2-3

students last year• Students are in charge of forming groups• New groups formed every semester• Team building courses:

– Roles, communication, co-operation, conflicts

9

Page 10: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

Group meeting

Subgroup work

Discussion

Disagreement

Presentation

Compromise

Exam Report writingLife

Social activities

Studying engineering via group projects

BrainstormMultiple learning resources

Participating communities of practice

– active learning, communication, organization, and management

10

Page 11: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

ProjectsWhat ?• A unique task• Have a lot of complex activities• Needs several people with different skills• Have a final goal/objective• Limited resources (time, money, people)• Have to deliver a result at a given time:

– As a minimum a written report

11

Page 12: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

ProjectsWhy ?• More and more companies use project

organization• Much engineering work is performed as

projects• Motivates the students and increases

student activity• Secures deep learning in subjects covered

in the project• Improves documentation skills

12

Page 13: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

Projects

How ?• One project each semester• Necessary theories and methods given in

(project) courses

13

Page 14: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

The New Aalborg Model

50%courses

50%project

Course

5 ECTS

Project 15 ECTS

In groups up to 8 personsIndividual assessmentSelf-selected groups

Appointed supervisor(s)

One semester

1 ECTS (European Credit Transfer System) = 30 working hours

Course

5 ECTS

Course

5 ECTS

14

Page 15: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

ProjectsHow ?• One project each semester• Necessary theories and methods given in

project courses • Each group has (at least) one supervisor• Documentation:

– a written report, oral defence, (construction)• Courses in:

– project management and planning

15

Page 16: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

Problem based project work - a model

Initial problem of the project – what makes

you wonder?

Analysis of the initial problem :

central themes and elements of the

problem.

Problem statement based on the analysis

Statement of the question(s) which will be addressed in the project.

-Project limitations-Project design

Addressing the problemstatement

-Methods-Theories

-Empirical work-Finding a solution?

-Creating new knowledge

ConclusionsAnswering the

question of the problem

statement. Placing the

question into other

perspectives16

Page 17: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

Process oriented project work - a model

Establishing the group as a team

Clarifying strengths and weaknesses of

the group members, group visions, and

expectations

What increases and decreases motivation for the work and the

team?

Defining individual and collective

learning objectives

Establishing structures for

knowledge sharing and process

evaluation

First evaluation of work process – do we reach our

objectives? Do we work towards collective goals? Do we share motivation? Do we share knowledge?

How can we strengthen the process?

Focus on evaluation of the project content and

process:•Sharing knowledge

•Motivation•Collective goals

•Team collaborationDo we need to change

strategies or structures?

Reflections on the project and team

processDid we reach our

objectives? Why – why not?

What do we wish to do different in our next project?17

Page 18: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

18

Page 19: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

The four phase model of a Project

Analysis

Design

Implementation

Test

Industriel Project

StudentProject

too broad

Student Project

too narrow

The idealStudent Project

Page 20: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

What is analysis?

Get an overview of the problem • Asking Questions• See Perspectives Divide into different aspects• Top Down• Bottum Up Look critically at all aspects• Estimate• Measure• Compare

Page 21: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

How to start analysing – presentation of two tools

• The six W- model

• Post It Brain storm1. Everybody writes keywords on Post It notes for 5 min

2. All notes are placed on the blackboard

3. All notes are read out

4. Everybody goes to the blackboard and structures the notes together

ProblemWhom?

Why? What?

Where?

When?How?

Page 22: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

PROBLEMWhat?• It can be theoretical, practical, social, technical,

symbolic-cultural or scientific• It grows out of students’ wondering within different

disciplines and professional environments• It is the starting point directing the students’ learning

process and situates the learning in a context• It may involve an interdisciplinary approach in both

the analysis and solving phase• It has to be exemplary

22

Page 23: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

EXEMPLARITY• Selection of relevant specific learning outcomes

and content/scientific knowledge that is exemplary to overall learning outcomes

• That is, the problem needs to refer back to a particular practical, scientific and/or technical domain

• The problem should stand as one specific example of more general learning outcomes related to knowledge and/or modes of inquiry

23

Page 24: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

Problems

Three different types of problem based projects at AAU:

Assignment projects (AP) – planning and control by the teachers/supervisors– problem and the subject chosen beforehand

Subject projects (SP) – definition of the subject by the teachers

beforehand. – students choose a problem and method.

Problem projects (PP) – problem determines the choice of disciplines and

methods.

Page 25: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

ProblemsWhy ?• Real world problems are interdisciplinary and

complex• It is a learner-centred process• It meets the learners' interests and enhances

motivation • It emphasizes development of analytical,

methodological and transferable skills

25

Page 26: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

AAU students on problems

• ”We are engineers – our responsibility is to solve real technological problems.”

• ”This is the first time we found a real problem ourselves rather than getting something from supervisors. It is really exciting. It fits my way of learning. I learn better when I find the way myself. This way of learning is much better than only attending lectures, because I have to know why I need to learn this. When I know the objective clearly, I learn much better.”

• ”When working on a problem, I am strongly motivated and attracted. We need to solve this problem.”

Xiangyun Du, 200526

Page 27: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

Problems

How ?• The project groups choose their own problem

to work with in the projects• The problem has to be analyzed within a

relevant context before it can be solved or analyzed further

• The problem determines the choice of methods and theories to be used

27

Page 28: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

PBL as educational model - practice at AAU students’ experiences

LecturesSupervision

Problem solving in group-organized project work Family,

friends

Literature

Companies

Other teaching

staff

experts

Other groups Students

from other programs

More resources?

LibraryInternet

Experiments

Multiple learning resources Drawing upon multiple learning resources, students take active role

creating learning opportunities and managing their own learning

Page 29: Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems

35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia

We are engineers, our tasks are to solve

problems (Male EE)

Students’ perceptions

We want to make it possible that we can learn from each

other and everybody can learn what they want to learn

This makes our study serious… like real work

place (Male EE)

We develop social skills in group work, this improves the learning

process

We get mental support from each other, it involves lots of

responsibility so that we don’t easily drop out (Female A&D)

We develop ourselves and get mature along

the way

I understand things better through explaining,

discussing and practicing

We feel easier to learn the technical skills

through group work

I am confident in different tasks now

after these experiences…

I am strongly motivated when working on

problems

We learn best when the knowledge can be related to

the assignment and our project

Project work help me get some ideas of what I am

going to learn…

PBL as educational model - practice at AAU students’ reflection

29