8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

1/16

AnalyzingHarmoniousand

ObsessivePassionAmongtheYouth

JenniferAnnLajom

CarloMagno

DeLaSalleUniversity-Manila

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

2/16

WhatisPassion? Astronglikingforanacvity,objectorconceptthatis

freelyselected,accommodatedduringleisure

meandfacilitatedbytrialanderrortoarriveat

preferredacvies(Vallerand,2008,2010).

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

3/16

DualiscModelofPassion(DMP) Obsessivepassion(OP):

controlledinternalizaon

Interpersonalorintrapersonalpressure

fromtheaRached

conngenciesofthe

acvity

Harmoniouspassion(HP):autonomous

internalizaon Acknowledges

importanceofanacvity

butwithoutaRaching

conngencies

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

4/16

PassionandAcvityEngagement Autonomy,relatednessandcommitment Identy

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

5/16

esearchObjecves ConfirmthefactorstructureofVallerand's

DMP

Validateatheorecalconceponthatifapersonispassionateaboutanacvity,more

meisspentonit

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

6/16

Methodology Design:QuantaveapproachusingPredicve

Cross-SeconalDesign

Sample:406undergraduatestudents M=18.76yearsold,SD=3.16years Males=117,Females=286,Unidenfied=3

Analysis:StructuralEquaonsModelling

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

7/16

Methodology Instrument:PassionScale(Vallerandetal.,2003)

14itemscalemeasuringOP(=.85)andHP(=.73)with7itemseach

OP:Ihavedifficultyimaginingmylifewithouttheseacvies.

HP:Theacviesallowmetoliveavarietyofexperiences. eportedTimeSpent(inhours)ofinvolvementin

passionateacvity

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

8/16

esults:DescripveStascsVariable Mean StandardDevia9on

ObsessivePassion 4.37 1.39

HarmoniousPassion 5.59 0.985

TimeSpent 9.885 7.879

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

9/16

esults:CorrelaonsVariable Obsessive

Passion

Harmonious

Passion

TimeSpent

Obsessive

Passion

1.0 0.46* 0.52*

Harmonious

Passion0.46* 1.0 0.36*

TimeSpent 0.52* 0.36* 1.0

*p < .05

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

10/16

esults:CFAOneFactorModel

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

11/16

esults:CFAOneFactorModelItemNo. Parameter

Es9mate

Standard

Error(D)

ItemNo. Parameter

Es9mate

Standard

Error(D)

1 0.549 0.092 8 1.454 0.118

2 0.579 0.070 9 1.276 0.102

3 0.629 0.095 10 1.379 0.101

4 0.676 0.093 11 1.283 0.125

5 0.688 0.102 12 0.885 0.161

6 0.641 0.106 13 1.149 0.141

7 0.963 0.123 14 1.193 0.164

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

12/16

esults:CFATwoFactorModel

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

13/16

esults:CFATwoFactorModelItemNo. Parameter

Es9mate

Standard

Error(D)

ItemNo. Parameter

Es9mate

Standard

Error(D)

1H 0.429 0.112 8O 1.297 1.023

2 0.481 0.098 9 1.160 0.825

3 0.497 0.124 10 1.199 0.874

4 0.590 0.132 11 1.128 0.759

5 0.667 0.000 12 0.585 0.000

6 0.656 0.155 13 0.937 0.500

7H 1.210 0.413 14O 1.370 1.140

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

14/16

esults:CFAGoodnessofFitModel

Structure

RMSEA GFI PGI

OneFactor .240 .603 .613

TwoFactor .045 .978 .990

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

15/16

esults:PathAnalysis

Chi-square=112.4 df=5 MSEA=.06 PGI=.91 GFI=.90

8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno

16/16

IMPLICATIONS Timespent:Duraonandfrequency Correlates:AcvityEngagement,Affect,Well-

Being

Identyepresentaon:Acvityselecon,valuaonandinternalizaon