Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Kathleen Schrader DNS, RN
Dean Math, Science & Engineering
Irvine Valley College
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaycLWgMX5w
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 2
“Stress is set of emotional, physical, and
cognitive (thought) reactions to a change.”
Five Stage Process
1. Recognition of Demand
2. Appraisal of the Demand
3. Nervous System Mobilization
4. Response to the Threat
5. Return to Baseline
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 3
Reaction to life change
Maybe negative (e.g. losing a job, divorce)
May be positive (e.g. new job, move)
Varies in intensity from high to low
Based on speed, volume and nature of change
Daily hassles vs. major life changes
Personal vulnerability to stress
What is very stressful to one person, may not be to another
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 4
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 5
Score of: 10 – 39 – Handle job stress well
40 – 69 – Handle job stress moderately well
70 – 100 – Need Help!
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 6
2006, Center for Creative Leadership
230 upper level managers, 40-50 years old
78% Males, 22% Females
Respondents said:
88% work is a primary source of stress in lives
65% believe stress is higher today than 5 yrs ago
75% leadership role contributes to increased
stress
www.ccl.org
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 7
Leadership Demands
28% - Lack of resources/time
“Do more with less and do it faster”
15% - Developing Others
11% - Establish/Maintain Relationships
10% - High Expectations
10% - Personal Insecurity
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 8
Interpersonal Demands
21% - Conflict/Trust/Politics
18% - Job Constraints to Relationships
14% - Personal Insecurity
14% - Building/Maintain Relationships
10% - Style Differences
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 9
Roles – Stress from
Boss
24% - Lack of Respect/Support
22% - Style Differences
Peers
35% - Competition/Lack of Teamwork
13% - Lack of Respect/Support
Subordinates
42% - Lack of Personal Accountability
Customers
63% - Unrealistic Expectations and Demand
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 10
Maddi & Khoshaba
12 year study on Illinois Bell
Telephone employees
Organizational change due to
corporate restructure
2/3 of the people showed
significant health breakdown
1/3 maintained
health/performance & thrived
Found they had 3 attributes:
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 11
Psychological Hardiness
Commitment
Challenge
Control
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 12
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 13
Score of:
50 – 60 - Exceptional Hardiness
40 – 49 - Above Average Hardiness
5 – 39 - Need Help!
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 14
Strong & stable belief system
Sense of purpose
Connection to others
Know there are resources to draw on
Hardy people:
Deeply committed to their work
Readily take responsibility
Actively pursue their goals
Enjoy the process of learning
Proud of their accomplishments
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 15
Change generates sense of challenge
Mobilized rather than defeated
Hardy people:
Embrace new challenges
Act as catalysts in response to change
View change with confidence & self-determination
Continually grow from their new experiences
Flexible and persistent
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 16
Capacity to make choices under stress
Understand stress within a larger context
Repertoire of positive coping skills
Hardy people:
Sense of personal control over their lives
Strong sense of autonomy/independence
Feel they are "Masters of their Fate!"
Take responsibility for their actions
Strong will to achieve
Desire to make a difference
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 17
Hardy Personality
Commitment
Challenge
Control
Mediators
Cognitive Appraisal of Experience
Coping Strategies Available
Resiliency Under Stress
Psychological Well Being
Psychological Distress
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 18
“We don’t see the world as it is, we see it as we are.”
Unknown
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 19
A Activating
EventStressor
BBeliefs
Negative Appraisal
C
ConsequencesStress
Response
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 20
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 21
Score of:
40 – 60 Logical and Rational
20 – 39 Moderately Irrational
0 – 19 Need Help!
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 22
AActivating
Event Stressor
B Beliefs
Negative Appraisal
C Consequences
Stress Response
DDisruption of
Thoughts
Reframing
EEffective
Replacement
Reappraisal
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 23
1. Black and White
Thinking
2. Overgeneralization
3. Catastrophizing
4. Mental Filter
5. Magnifying or
Minimizing
6. Personalization and
Blame
7. Labeling and
Mislabeling
8. Jumping to Conclusions
– Mind Reading
9. Jumping to Conclusions
– Fortune Telling
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 24
10. Emotional Reasoning
11. Discounting the
Positive
12. Hindsight Thinking
13. What If‟s
14. Egocentric Thinking
15. Being Right
16. Control Error
17. Change Error
18. Fairness Error
19. Heaven‟s Reward
Thinking
20. Unrealistic
Comparisons
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 25
1. Demand for Approval
2. High Self Expectations
3. Dependency
4. Helplessness
5. Emotional Control
6. Blame Proneness
7. Personal Idealism
8. Frustration Reactivity
9. Problem Avoidance
10. Discomfort Anxiety
11. Perfectionism
12. Anxious Over-Concern
13. Over-Caring
14. Fear of Losing Control
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 26
“A pessimist is one who makes difficulties of his opportunities,
and
an optimist is one who makes opportunities of
his difficulties”. Harry Truman
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 27
1. What are my thoughts about the event?
2. What Stressful Thinking Errors could I be
making?
3. What Core Beliefs do I have that may be
influencing my perception of the event?
4. Are my thoughts on the event accurate?
5. What objective evidence/objective facts are
there to support my view?
6. What alternative views are there of the
event?
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 28
7. Am I underestimating my ability to cope
with the event?
8. What is the worst that can happen if my view
of the event is correct?
9. What actions can I take to influence the
event?
10. What is the worst thing that could happen to
me or my family and how does this event
compare to that?
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 29
AActivating Event
Stressor
BBeliefs
Negative Appraisal
CConsequences
Stress Response
DDisruption of Thoughts
Reframing
EEffective Replacement
ReappraisalWrite down details of the
event or situation.Write down the negative beliefs, thoughts, images, attitudes, assumptions, or opinions about the event
noted in Column A.
Write down the emotions (e.g. stress, anxiety, anger tension, frustration, etc.) that occurred as a result
of Columns A + B.
Write down a positive alternative thought that
will dispute the automatic negative beliefs/thoughts
in Column B.
Report the effectiveness of this new stress reducing
approach. Describe how it helped you deal with the
stressor in Column A.
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 30
1. Optimism
2. Cognitive Flexibility
3. Moral Compass
4. Altruism
5. Role Model
6. Face Your Fears
7. Coping Skills
8. Social Network
9. Fitness
10. Laughter
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 31
Commitment:
1. Stay involved with a difficult
situation, rather than backing
off.
Control:
2. Exert an influence on outcomes,
rather than giving up.
Challenge:
3. View stress and change as
normal, a stimulus to growth.
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 32
Cognitive Restructuring:
4. When stress occurs, don„t deny,
overreact, avoid, or strike out.
5. Put stress in a broader
perspective, so that it„s more
tolerable.
6. Analyze stress, so that you can
see how best to solve it.
7. Make action plan to turn stress to
your advantage, & carry it out.
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 33
Social Support:
8. Don't let conflicts with others
drag on or get worse.
9. See conflict in a broader
perspective, analyze your
own and others‟ roles in it.
10. Take actions to resolve each
conflict – replace it with a
pattern of giving and
receiving assistance and
encouragement.
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 34
Commitment
• Close social bonds
• Supportive relationships with many caring others
• Development of values & life skills
• Promote sharing responsibilities, service to others, “required helpfulness”
Challenge
• Use high warmth & low criticism style of interaction
• Express high, but realistic expectations for success
• Offer opportunities to share unique talents or gifts of child
Control
• Set & enforce clear boundaries (rules, norms, & laws)
• Encourage goal-setting and mastery
• Provide opportunities for leadership, decision-making, and other meaningful participation
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 35
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 36
Provide Caring & Support
Set and Communicate
High Expectations
Provide Opportunities
for Meaningful
Participation
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 37
Provide Caring & Support
• Feels school is a caring place
• Has sense of belonging
• Experiences school as a community
• See many ways to be rewarded & recognized
Set & Communicate High Expectations
• Believes that any goal or aspiration is possible
• Shows confidence in self & others
• Encourages self & other to do the "best possible"
Provide Opportunities for Meaning Participation
• Believes voice is heard in classroom & school decisions
• Helps others learn via cooperative learning, peer tutoring, etc.
• Exhibits self-efficiacy in taking on challenges
“It is not stress that kills us, it is our reaction to it.”
Hans Selye
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 38
QUESTIONS?
2/26/2010 Schrader, ACCCA San Francisco 2/2010 39