Counterintuitive Analysis by Stephen J. Schrader

8/11/2019 Counterintuitive Analysis by Stephen J. Schrader

1/30

The author is a former career US Army counterintelligence

agent, who specialized in Human Intelligence andCounterintellignce Analysis operations. He has spent the

first thirteen years after leaving the service in researching

and formalizing the technique that made him a success as aThinker, Tanker, Soldier, Spy into a formulae for doing

the impossible, getting beyond our greatest obstacle topersonal advancement: ourselves.


2/30


3/30

This work is dedicated to the man whose discovery of

Troy inspired it, Heinrich Schliemann.


4/30


5/30

Stephen J Schrader

C O U N T E R I N T U I T I V E

A N A L Y S I S


6/30

Copyright Stephen J. Schrader

The right of Stephen J. Schrader to be identified as author of this

work has been asserted by him in accordance with section 77 and

78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may bereproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any

form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,

recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the

publishers.

Any person who commits any unauthorized act in relation to thispublication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims

for damages.

A CIP catalogue record for this title is available from the British

Library.

ISBN 978 184963 885 2

www.austinmacauley.com

First Published (2014)

Austin Macauley Publishers Ltd.

25 Canada Square

Canary WharfLondon

E14 5LB

Printed and bound in Great Britain


7/30

Introduction

I took the one less travelled by,

And that has made all the difference

Robert Frost, The Road Not Taken

This work is a study of what Prejudice and Assumptionhave

blinded us to.For decades now the Prejudices and Assumptions that we

hold against our fellow man have been brought out and

highlighted as a major flaw in the human psyche.Whether its based on skin colour, nationality, language,

religion, cultural or political differences, the expression of theTribal Instincts of Us vs. Them inherent in Prejudice has

been highlighted as blinding us to the qualities and the

potentials of those others.But Prejudice and Assumption arent limited to only our

fellow man. Its also to be found in art, music, and knowledge.

What was that? Knowledge?

Yes, and its that combination of Prejudice andAssumption when applied to knowledge that is possibly themost insidious and damaging of all.

Anybody can see that concentration camps for the

extermination of millions are a Bad Thing, but what of a fear-inspired prejudicial determination to not even acknowledge

that there CAN be Another Way enslaving billions to atwisted system rigged to empower the few, the elite, at the

expense of all the rest?I know, Thats IMPOSSIBLE!Um, no its not. And thats what this book is all about:

showing the Prejudice for what it is, and giving a glimpse of


8/30

those Alternatives, an unlimited landscape of new thoughtand new possibilities.

Shall we get to it?

The Counterintuitive Process

There is a certain class of question that has come to be

accepted as Unanswerable. These are the Mysteries of the

Universe, Wonders of the Future, and Secrets of the Past.Basically, the Normal analytical processes have failed

when it comes to these Imponderables.

Now, in a career as a Counterintelligence Agent with theUS Army, I developed the Counterintelligence Analytical

Process into an art form. The Civilian Version of this I callCounterintuitive Analysis or CI Analysis.

Its a way of finding the answers to questions that cannot

be answered by normal analytical processes.As such it isnt meant to replace the Normal analytical

processes. Rather it is simply to act as an adjunct to them for

solving questions that cannot otherwise be answered.The first thing that we have to figure out is, Why? Why are

the normal analytical processes unable to answer thesequestions?

Where Ive been able to find New Possibilities is that the

prejudices and assumptions of those that have tried to answerthese questions prevented them from even considering that

there could be other possibilities.Its not that the answers arent there, but that the one doing

the looking is unable to see them for what they are.

The CI Analytical process is nothing more and nothing lessthan a way of getting around the deeply ingrained, even

instinctive prejudices of the person asking the question.An example EVERYBODY knows that the sun rises in

the east and sets in the west. Its a scientifically proven fact

that this takes place.However, an ancient legend of an epic voyage of some

hero-type describes a place where the sun not only didnt rise

in the east and set in the west, but didnt rise at all. Or that it


9/30

didnt set at all but simply circled around the horizon for dayson end.

Is it a lie? Since it obviously violates thescientific fact thatthe sun rises in the east and sets in the west, can it only be

Made Up and Fantasy?

Or, is this evidence that at some time in the past, whoeverfirst told this tale actually witnessed this phenomenon, a

phenomenon that science has proven can, and does happen

every yearat the Earths North and South Poles.As well, the very fact that this is included in the tale would

lend support to the possibility of the tale actually being a true

story (if maybe embellished as all Good Stories are) of such avoyage which actually did take place.

I know, this is an easy one, since everybody knows aboutthe Midnight Sun phenomenon.

But, thats exactly why I included it, to show how easy itwould be for the prejudice and assumptions of the one doing

the analysis prevents them from seeing the possibility that the

story might be true.

So, lets try a Less Obvious but still very true exampleThe discovery of the ancient city of Troy by Heinrich

Schliemann (1822-1890).By the mid-19

th century Schliemann was what we would

call a successful entrepreneur and a self-made multi-millionaire. In the modern world that would make him a multi-

billionaire.

He was also what we would call an eccentric, which iswhat the rich nutcases are called in almost any era.

Now, he believed that the story of the Trojan War, as givenby Homer in the Iliad and the Odyssey, was based on actual

history.

And simply everybody just knew that they were nothingbut fantasy, legends and morality plays told by Homer to earn

his keep. After all the Science of the day hadproven that they

couldnt exist.Because of that proof, academia in Schliemanns day

ridiculed and mocked the very concept that they could possiblyhave been based on real events.


10/30

But, Schliemann disagreed. And he went to the eccentricextreme of setting out to prove it.

And, he found the ancient city of Troy, discovered theMinoan Culture, and pushed the concept of Western

Civilization back by about a thousand years from what the

scientists of his day just knewto be fact.It was in studying what he did and more importantly what

it meant that I developed my concept of Counterintuitive

Analysis.Basically, Counterintuitive Analysis consists of four steps.

1)

Assumption(s) You must counteract your inherentprejudices and assumptions by specifically addressing

the question in hand with NEW assumptionsdiametrically opposed to the Norm.

2) Path to Follow Follow the data path, no matterwhere it leads.

3)

K.I.S.S. Keep telling yourself, Keep It Simple

Stupid: applying Occams Razor with a vengeance.

4)

Cross-reference your findings.

ASSUMPTION(S) Of these, discarding your prejudices,or rather doing a proper analysis of the question despite your

prejudices, is the toughest part. It is also why I call it Counter-Intuitive analysis.

For you see, Intuition- the ability to acquire knowledge

without inference and/or the use of reason IS the essence ofPrejudice, pre-judging the results of an investigation. All

prejudice is personal, social, societal and cultural in nature; itis ingrained in an individuals personality and virtually

impossible to disregard.

Which is what makes the first step both the toughest andmost important step of all.

In Schliemanns case he assumednot only that the events

covered in Homers works were real, but that those workscontained everything he needed to find Troy.


11/30

PATH TO FOLLOWFollowing the data path, no matterwhere it leads, can be the step requiring the most personal and

moral courage.For you see, theres a reason WHY your society, your

culture, your history, your very personality have ingrained

those prejudices in you.Theyre often the accepted facts of life for your world,

and here you are doing something that will make a mockery of

all of them: something that may remove the security blanket ofignorance, opening you up to an unknown and possibly

dangerous world.

K.I.S.S.In the CI Analytical process K.I.S.S. is actuallythe most important part of the equation. For you must take

what youve learned and pare it down. Cut it back to its mostbasic and simple iteration. Its nothing more than the

application of Occams Razor, used in logic and problem-solving. It states that among competing hypotheses, the

hypothesis with the fewest assumptions should be the correct

one.

(NOTE: MANY people misapply Occams Razor. Theyhold that it states that the simplest answer must be the correct

one. It doesnt, it simply states that it should be or is mostprobably the correct one.)

Youll find that virtually every single example I give inthis book is a Duh moment. Something that once given is SO

obvious that you actually wont be able to understand WHY

nobody ever saw it before.While cross-referencing and briefing others on the CI

technique and the findings Im inevitably told, WellANYBODY could have figured that out! Which is absolutely

true, and the fact that nobody ever did is THE reason for this

work.Oh, and to pre-empt the wags out there Just saying It

CAN NOT BE is NOT a viable hypotheses. After all, THAT

is the ultimate expression of thePrejudice andAssumption thatmade this work necessary.

CROSS-REFERENCE Cross-reference is where youtake what youve done and see where it leads. Youre going to


12/30

be surprised by where things will lead. In the same way thattugging a single thread on a spider web will restructure the

whole thing, tugging at a single prejudice can remake ourwhole world.

Now one word of caution: the material I present here, these

Answers, may seem to be presented in an arrogant anddefinitive manner that precludes any and all other possibilities.

I assure you that this is NOT the case. As of this writing

Ive been working on and researching some of this material forabout forty years. And much of what has gone into this work is

information that has only recently come to light.

In other words, as the information changes so will theanalysis. In this work I simply point out the possibilities, the

wonderful and maybe awful possibilities, as they stand at thistime.


13/30

Part I

Mysteries of the PastMyster ies that change everything

I

Atlantis

For our first trial of the technique well look at one of the first

Tests I ever put it to, discovering the lostcity of Atlantis.The CI Analytical steps were

1) The Assumption(s)Plato actually knew what he wastalking about. Atlantis was real and existed

when/where he described.2) The Data PathAll previous attempts to find Atlantis

have failed, so disregard all of them: simply follow

Platos descriptions.3)

K.I.S.S. All previous efforts have failed because

they have attempted to locate the city. However, aftereleven thousand years of time identifiable traces of thecity may not be available. But Plato also described the

hill/area where Atlantis was built. Find the hill, find

the city.

4) Cross-ReferenceOnce you find the site, find out if

any supporting evidence might exist to confirm the

theory.


14/30

In the same way that Troy was only to be found in theworks of Homer, Atlantis can only be found in the works of

Plato, his Timaeus and Critias, written c. 360 BCE.According to Plato, Atlantis was a naval power that

conquered many parts of Western Europe and Africa 9,000

years before the time of the legendary Athenian lawgiverSolon (c.638-558 BCE), i.e. the 10

thmillennium BCE.

Now, before we begin with the analysis I need to make a

point. There have been MANY theories giving this place orthat as either Atlantis or the inspiration for the story.

Unfortunately ALL these theories have the same basic

weakness: for them to be correct you have to disregard one ormore, or sometimes ALL of the clues that Plato, our ONLY

source for the legend provides.As with Schliemann, if it doesnt match EVERY detail

given, it CANT be Atlantis.Now, Plato described it as being opposite Athens (Greece)

beyond the Pillars of Hercules, which are identified with

what we now call the Strait of Gibraltar.

He stated that the direct path was blocked by a sea chokedby Weeds and Slime, which is a perfect description of the

Sargasso Sea: An area of some 1.4 million sq miles, in themiddle of the North Atlantic. Its noted for being so choked by

the distinctive Sargasso Seaweed as to provide a navigationconcern for modern vessels and a Death Trap for ships in the

Age of Sail.

If we simply (remember that K.I.S.S. thing) draw a linefrom Gibraltar through the heart of the Sargasso Sea, it will

take us to the Caribbean.According to Plato, the continent of Atlantis was located

Towards the center of the sea beyond the Pillars of Hercules.

What so many theories for the location of Atlantis haverun into is the conundrum that there is, and hasnt been any dry

land, let alone a whole continent, in the center of the Atlantic

Ocean in geologic history.However, the confusion is based on a particular prejudice

of the people doing the search.


15/30

WE, as in the modern world, are the ones that have dividedthe worlds oceans into the Atlantic, Pacific, Indian, Arctic,

and Southern (Antarctic). In Platos Greece, on the other hand,all the waters of the world beyond the Pillars of Hercules

were considered to be one sea, the Ocean Sea.

Now, in the south, the western continent(s) are half theglobe away from Asia, while in the north they literally come

within sight of Asia. So, describing the American continent(s)

as being Towards the Center of the Ocean Sea is entirelyaccurate.

Now, we cant assume that this is true. Not unless we can

find more, confirming evidence.He described the Atlantean continent as being Larger than

Asia and Africa combined, and a simple glance at globe willshow that North and South America is NOT larger than Asia

and Africa combined.Again, were dealing with modernprejudices. WE are the

ones that identify not only the continents of Africa and Asia,

let alone dividing the Western Continent into North and South

America.In Platos day, Africa and Asia were the names of

simple provinces that roughly correspond with what we nowcall Libya and Turkey, and the western continental landmass

IS larger than both of those.We now run into our next problem, there have been no

cities or traces of any such Classical civilization found in the

western hemisphere. Native civilizations yes, Greco-RomanClassical no.

However, if Platos description of the time-frame for thedestruction of the city of Atlantis 11,000 years ago is correct, it

would have been at the end of the last Ice Age, when so much

of the worlds water was tied up in the great ice sheetscovering much of the world that the worlds sea levels were

several hundred feet lower than they are now.

In addition, he DID describe the Atlantean civilization asbeing a Naval Power. In other words, after eleven millennia of

time the only traces of the civilization will probably be foundbeneath the coastal waters of the modern world.


16/30

So, is there no way of finding the location of the cityitself?

Yes, there is.For Plato also described the layout of the great plain of

Atlantis, as well as the low, round mountain the city was built

on.The great plain of Atlantis was 3,000 stadia (About

555km/345mi) long and 2,000 stadia (about 370km/230mi)

wide.The low round mountain whose peak the city was built on

was 5 stadia (0.92km/0.57mi) in diameter was located at the

center of the coastline.The plain was surrounded on the east, north, and western

sides by a continuous line of mountains and open to the sea tothe south.

Now, we could go to the trouble of trying to find terrainmatching this description anywhere along the coasts of North

or South America. But we dont have to.

Remember that line we drew, following Platos description

that went from Gibraltar through the center of the Sargasso Seaand to the Caribbean? Now, on a modern map, preferably one

that shows not only the land but also the sea-bottomtopography, start at the city of Havana, Cuba and go due south.

Across the island nation of Cuba you will find a large,relatively shallow bay, a bay that matches Platos dimensions

for the great plain of Atlantis exactly.

On the southern edge of the bay, where it drops off intodeeper water you will find a low, round island, called the Isle

of Youth by the Cuban government.Again, while the peak of the mountain and all traces of the

city itself have been worn away by 11,000 years of erosion, it

matches the description of the mountain that the city was builton exactly.

In addition, the mountains that make up the spine of the

Island of Cuba curve protectively around this bay to the east,north and west, again exactly as described by Plato.

And to add a bit of icing on the cake, the last time thatthe plain was dry land was in exactly the same time-frame as


17/30

Plato gave for the sinking of the city and the plain beneath thesea.

Okay, we have the location, as well as confirmation of thetime-frame matching Platos description.

Two questions remain

1) Is there any archaeological evidence supporting the

possibility that this might be the location of Atlantis?

2) What was the cataclysm that sank Atlantis beneath thesea 11,000 years ago?

As for #1, sea-bottom dredging in the area frequentlybrings up bits and pieces of ancient pottery, statuary and

worked stone in the Classic Greco-Roman style. To date,ALL this is assumed to have been material brought over as

ballast by the Spanish galleons in the days of the SpanishMain.

However, now that weve found a probable location for the

city/nation of Atlantis somebody might actually want to check

out this material, rather than just depending on the assumptionsmade in the past.

Also, we have the famed Bimini Road located in theshallow waters to the north and east of Cuba, and the reported

Giant Pyramids located off the western tip of Cuba.Now, what was the cataclysm that sank the nation of

Atlantis, in the span of a day and a night, according to Plato?

Here we get into the Cross-Referencing I mentionedbefore.

Anybody thats experienced Spring Breakup in Alaskacan tell you that as the weather warms up, you can identify,

literally to the second, the moment that all the frozen lakes and

streams will break up, sending a flood of shattered ice andwater streaming into the ocean.

The time-frame given for the destruction of the city was at

the end of the last Ice Age, when the great sheets of theglaciers had spent several centuries melting, and great lakes of

melt-water were being held back. Its not too hardto imagine aSpring Breakup writ large, with the sudden collapse of the


18/30

glaciers sending a world-shifting flood of water and icepouring into the sea and driving up the sea-levels within a

matter of hours.That might need a bit of imagination, but again, the results

would have matched the description of the cataclysm given by

Plato.Now for the final step: the part where you have to have the

moral courage to follow through with the investigation.

For you see, when modern science tells us that ModernMan has been around for tens of thousands of years, a simple

check of their statements will show that they are talking about

Cro Magnon man, NOT modernHomo Sapiens Sapiens.Science has been incredibly reticent in identifying the

appearance of Homo Sapiens Sapiens some time sinceapproximately 7,000 BCE.

The reason for this is inherent with another bit of analysisthat we will be covering later. But for now, the simple fact of

the matter is that the Atlanteans werent truly modern men,

rather they were late-model Cavemen that Science holds as

immutable fact were incapable of working in anything butanimal skins and chipped-flint instruments.

The confirmation of the location as well as the veryexistence of Atlantis will literally force the re-thinking of not

only the history of civilization, but re-define the very meaningof what it means to beHuman.


19/30


20/30

Modern science has hypothesized the existence ofEinstein-Rosen Bridges aka Artificial Wormholes,

connecting one place to another via an inter-dimensional path.And of course, WHY would I connect the global legends

of Dragons with Wormholes?

Ill admit that I was stumped in my analysis. After all, Icould find NO supporting evidence that creatures meeting

dragons description and capabilities ever existed. So, I began

considering the possibility of either a natural phenomenon or atechnologic effect that could have atmospheric or optical

effects that could be described as Aerial Serpents twisting

and turning high into the air, feathered or otherwise, by eye-witnesses that didnt know what they were actually dealing

with.If so, this wouldnt be the first time that science has missed

a side-effect of technologic development. For example, theSonic Boom created when a supersonic aircraft goes Trans-

Sonic was as much a surprise to the scientists and engineers as

it was to the pilots and witnesses on the ground when it first

happened.Now, in my research of the Dragons of myth I found an

interesting dichotomy. In Western mythos Dragons aremonsters and beasts of the end of the world.

In virtually every other culture we find that theyreinextricably mixed with stories of the Gods, the bringers of

knowledge, technology, and wisdom, as well as being able to

deliver devastation and ruin on an epic scale: devastation thatmost often takes the form of Breathing or spewing forth fire

(with a good dose of Brimstone or sulfur in the mix), water,fogwhatever.

Then I came across the representations of the Mayan

Dragon God Kukulkan.Of particular interest were the three Aspects of Kukulkan

in Mayan statuary, that of a Feathered Serpent, that of a

Man, and- this in particularthat of a Man emerging fromthe mouth of a Serpent.

While the first two details are actually quite common inthe ancient Legends of Dragons, with the seeming


21/30

interchangeability of human and serpent imagery, that last wasunique.

Other details of Kukulkan match that of other non-WesternDragons: the bringer of knowledge, wisdom, etc.

As well cover when we get to Wormhole Generators in

the chapter on Meissner Tech, there are three Modes inwhich Wormhole Generators can work.

The first is a wormhole reaching from Generator to

Generator.The second is a wormhole reaching from Generator to

Targeted Point.

And the third is a wormhole reaching from TargetedPoint, via a Generator, to another Targeted Point.

Numbers one and two are good for the communication andtransportation uses of the technology.

The second and third Modes are needed for the use of thewormhole as a weapon. As in, what would happen if you

aimed the wormhole exit at the target, be it an enemy army,

city, or entire region, and opened the other end in the extreme

pressure of a volcanic magma chamber?Doing this would create a virtual High-Energy Plasma

weapon capable of destroying any target, even today. And addthe side effect of Brimstone to the mix, a very common detail

when it comes to the legends of Angry Dragons.Now, WHO are the ones that were opening these

wormholes, givers of knowledge, wisdom, technology, and

worshipped as Gods?For that youll have to wait for sections on analyzing the

Biblical Ark, and the chapter on Meissner Tech itself.One note: in the case of the Norse mythos, they didnt

need a Beast rationale to explain the comings and goings of

their Gods, they had Bifrost, and the Northern Lights toequate it with. And again, it was their enemies that used the

Dragon symbology to explain the activities of their gods.

Anyhow, be it God or gods, aliens, angels, demons, orwhatever, they did what they did and the technology they used

is what gave us our global Legends of Dragons.


22/30

III

Hades

Another universal theme we find among ancient peoples, and

still another item thats mocked and ridiculed by modern

science, is the concept of a Hollow Earth.

Again, the probability is that something so prevalent willhave some foundation in fact.

1) Assumption(s)The Earth is hollow.

2)

Path to FollowScience that supports this contention.3) K.I.S.S. Rather than try and bring all the divergent

global myths and legends together, simply give the

science that supports it.4)

Cross-Reference Chapters on Meissner Tech,

Angels and Demons, and Dragons.

Basically, a truly non-prejudicial assessment of the

contention shows almost immediately that all modern scienceon the subject iswrong. The Earth HAS to be hollow.

Our modern gravitational theory holds that Mass Creates

Gravity. While the exact manner of this generation isunknown the relationship between the two is undeniable.

So, the question is, HOW is it POSSIBLE that the Earthcould be hollow?

Simple, really. We know that gravity pulls to the center of

the mass, but what happens when youre AT the center of aplanetary mass? What direction does gravity pull, when ALL

the mass involved is outbound?

Basically, any planetary body with enough mass togenerate gravity will have a point of zero gravity at its very

center.


23/30

Then, add in the centrifugal force of the bodys rotationand it will automatically expand into a hollow sphere, aka the

Hollow Earth.The next question: is there any evidence supporting this

contention?

Actually yes, and most of it comes from the very latestscientific information.

It was proven long ago that IF the Earth was hollow, the

torque effect of the rotation would create holes at bothrotational poles.

Now, in our modern science there are ONLY two ways

that you can have a large hole in a planetary surface: they are avolcanic crater pushing out, or an impact crater pushing in.

Rumors of a huge impact crater under the waters of theArctic Ocean are just that, Rumors, and therefore cannot be

included in this analysis. However, I will go far enough to saythat the same centrifugal and torque effects that cause the

planet to be hollow will also keep the waters of the surface

ocean from draining into the central void. The water will

flow in, to the point where gravity pulling down is matched bythe centrifugal force pushing out. It stops there; after all, water

doesnt flow uphill.Anyhow, thats the North Pole. What about the South

Pole?In 2006 it was announced that a giant impact crater had

been found under three miles of ice at the earths southern pole

on the continent of Antarctica.Okay, so they found a hole. What does that prove?

One hole means nothing. But, IF the earth is hollow, thenEVERY such body must be hollow as well. Science is science

everywhere.

Now, Mars has ice caps on both poles, and Venus has acloudy atmosphere so we cant see if they have such openings

on their poles.

However, in 1994 it was announced that water had beendiscovered on the Moon.

It seems that a reconnaissance satellite went off orbit,and photographed the Moons southern pole. It revealed a


24/30

giant Impact Crater directly on the Moons southern pole,one that was so deep it went all the way down to an ice plug.

Then it was announced that a flyby satellite had foundwater on Mercury. Again, it had found a giant impact crater

directly on Mercurys southern pole, one that was so deep that

it went all the way down to an ice plug.Then there are the gas giant planets of the outer solar-

system. The Cassini probe, during its flyby of Saturns

northern pole, found a giant hurricane eye exactly over thepole.

And, science is at some difficulty in trying to explain it.

Now as I said, ONE hole doesnt prove anything. Butfinding the exact same hole on every single planetary body that

weve been able to examine is another matter entirely.Okay, if the Earth is hollow, then what does that mean?

You mean beyond the problem of what that fact means forall those myths and legends of an Underworld occupied by

demons, devils, and monsters of all types? That Hell and

Hades may exist after all?

For example, the event that science tells us exterminatedthe dinosaurs on the surface would have had no effect on the

Inner World. Just imagine what the raptors and otherdinosaurs might have turned into if theyd been allowed to

continue their evolution And you get a pretty gooddescription of those same demons, devils, and monsters that

the Ancients ALL told us were down there.

THATs what it means.And now for the part that could cause us to have to re-

think what we know of the REST of the universe.One of the items that comes up in the legends of the

Underworld is the Inner Sun.

The what?There are two things that every point in our universe has in

common, Gravity and Velocity.

No part of the universe is supposed to be totally free ofgravity; even the space between galactic clusters still has a bit

of microgravity to contend with.


25/30

In addition, in the constantly expanding universe modelevery part of it has velocity.

And theres that whole Einsteins Theory of Relativitything relating velocity and mass, and we know mass creates

gravity.

However, this means that it should be theoreticallypossible to create a stable and permanent hole in the

Universe by simply having a point with neither velocity nor

gravity. The nature of the Hollow Earth within the mass ofthe planet would be isolated from the Velocity aswell as the

already seen Zero-G weve already demonstrated.

And its already been verified that these holes canexist

Its been found, from studying the results of nuclearweapons tests conducted since the end of World War II, that

detonating a nuclear explosion creates a Null Point in theuniverse at the point of detonation.

This is because the complete destruction of all mass and

the radiating of the energy of that destruction from the point of

detonation creates, for just an instant, a sphere of no matter, nomass, no energy and no velocity.

In other words, a hole in the universe.And, as I pointed out, at the exact center of a hollow

planetary mass, you have no mass and no velocity since thepoint is surrounded by, and isolated from the rest of the

universe by, the planetary mass.

And now the question is, So what? Whats that got to dowith our perspective of the universe?

Creating a uole in the universe opens a two-way openingto the Greater Universe beyond ours.

Again, the what?

Science has only recently fallen in love with the concept ofZero-Point Energy. Basically, its energy from the universal

Background beyond the multidimensional limits of our

universe.And there are real hopes of providing unlimited energy

from such a concept.


26/30

Basically, hole in the universe + zero-point energyleaking through = inner sun.

And, if we can prove this point, it will invalidate thetheories of Dark Energy and Dark Mass that astrophysicists

have made up from whole cloth to rationalize the fact that

there is evidence of too much mass and too much energy tosupport their model of the universe.

And that is the LEAST of what we can expect the

existence of an Inner Earth to change.After all, the hole leads to a place beyond our universe,

and at the very least would be connected to every other such

opening in our universe. In other words, a pathway we maybe able to take to every single planet, moon, sun, and galaxy in

ouruniverse, and beyond.(NOW can you see the value of the CI Analytical

process?)


27/30

IV

Ice Age

The cycle of the Ice Ages and Intermediary Periods is one

of those questions that science has been unable to properly

address.

The reason is that none of their theories adequately addressthe clearly cyclic nature of the phenomenon, nor why the end

of the last Ice Age was so cataclysmic that it resulted in thePleistocene Extinction Event. Basically, with the sole

exception of sub-Saharan Africa, everything on the planetbigger than a pig (make it about 90 lbs) died. And that the total

global human population dropped to about 2,000 mated

couples (calculated via tracing genetic trees).That specific event will be covered later, in the chapter

dealing with the CI analysis of the Biblical story of the Floodof Noah.

Now for the parameters of the CI Analysis to find the

cause of the cycle of the Ice Ages

1) Assumption(s) It is a cyclic phenomenon the nature

of which has not been previously addressed byscience.

2)

Path to FollowLook into the cycles relationship tothe apparently concurrent flipping of the Earths

magnetic poles.

3)

K.I.S.S.Since it IS a cycle of the earth it should besomething whose progression/status can be measured

today.

4)

Cross-ReferenceThe chapters on Perpetual Motionand The Flood of Noah.


28/30


29/30

over Antarctica that was all the craze with environmental typesback in the 1980sand 90s.)

Otherwise, ozone that is created on the surface of theEarth, by various fires, electrical activity, etc., is held close to

the surface by the Earths negative energy state (that whole

opposites attract energy effect) where its a primarypollution gas. Measuringthis gas is the gauge that makes up

the daily Air Pollution Reports of whats killing us on any

given day.Now, in the near future, when the Earths energy status

goes from negative to positive, this gas will be driven up

into the atmosphere (the same repels part of the energyinteraction thing), where it will eventually create at least one

super-thick, and probably several ozone layers, blocking muchlarger amounts of solar radiation.

Thats how we get to the Ice Age part of the cycle.And, since the positive energy state of the Earth will

create a MUCH stronger magnetic field, the localized reactions

of all this ozone will be even more extreme. Thus, Ice Age

towards one pole but not the other, etc.In addition, there is another factor to consider, one that

directly affects the entire timeline that Science has given us forour pastTo date, the primary means of archaeological dating

has been carbon-14 dating, which measures the buildup ofcarbon-14 in living tissue. Carbon-14 is created in the same

way that the modern ozone layer is created: the interaction of

cosmic radiation with the Earths upper atmosphere. However,the screening effect of the greatly increased ozone layer versus

both solar and cosmic radiation during the earths positivephase will have a direct, inverse relationship with the creation

of carbon-14. More ozone equals significantly less carbon-14.

Whats this mean? That all scientific dating from any timebefore the end of the last Ice Age has been seriously

compromised.

Anyhow, thats what causes both the ice ages and thepole flips.

Oh, one other little detail. When the Earth discharges itspositive electrical charge, that electricity has to go somewhere.


30/30

And science has yet to adequately explain the massive scorchmarks that mar the surface of the moon. However, being the

periodical target for a planet-sized arc-welder would accountfor those marks quite nicely.

Documents

Counterintuitive Analysis by Stephen J. Schrader