45
Overview The term pneumoperitoneum refers to the presence of air within the peritoneal cavity. The most common cause is a perforation of the abdominal viscus—most commonly, a perforated ulcer, although a pneumoperitoneum may occur as a result of perforation of any part of the bowel; other causes include a benign ulcer, a tumor, or trauma. The exception is a perforated appendix, which seldom causes a pneumoperitoneum. The presence of a pneumoperitoneum does not, however, always imply a perforation, because a number of other (mostly nonsurgical) conditions are associated with pneumoperitoneum. Likewise, not every bowel perforation results in a pneumoperitoneum; some perforations seal over, allowing little gas to escape. A pneumoperitoneum is common after abdominal surgery; it usually resolves 3-6 days after surgery, although it may persist for as long as 24 days after surgery. The peritoneum is a thin, serous membrane that lines the abdominal cavity. It has parietal and visceral layers, the latter being reflected 1

Journal Medscape EDIT

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

fjkfyu

Citation preview

Page 1: Journal Medscape EDIT

Overview

The term pneumoperitoneum refers to the presence of air within the peritoneal cavity. The most

common cause is a perforation of the abdominal viscus—most commonly, a perforated ulcer, although a

pneumoperitoneum may occur as a result of perforation of any part of the bowel; other causes include a

benign ulcer, a tumor, or trauma. The exception is a perforated appendix, which seldom causes a

pneumoperitoneum.

The presence of a pneumoperitoneum does not, however, always imply a perforation, because a

number of other (mostly nonsurgical) conditions are associated with pneumoperitoneum. Likewise, not

every bowel perforation results in a pneumoperitoneum; some perforations seal over, allowing little gas to

escape. A pneumoperitoneum is common after abdominal surgery; it usually resolves 3-6 days after

surgery, although it may persist for as long as 24 days after surgery.

The peritoneum is a thin, serous membrane that lines the abdominal cavity. It has parietal and

visceral layers, the latter being reflected over the abdominal viscera. A thin layer of serous fluid, which

acts as a lubricant, separates the 2 layers. Several intra-abdominal organs are invaginated by visceral

peritoneum to such an extent that they are almost completely covered by peritoneum; they have double

layers of peritoneum within them as mesenteries and ligaments (see the images below).

1

Page 2: Journal Medscape EDIT

Diagram of transverse section of the abdomen shows peritoneal reflection.

Diagram of a sagittal section of the female abdomen and pelvis shows peritoneal reflection.

2

Diagrams of the right upper quadrant show the location of the oblong collection of air in the right subhepatic space seen on a plain supine abdominal radiograph

Diagram of the right upper quadrant shows a triangle-shaped collection of air in the Morison pouch, as seen on a plain supine abdominal radiograph. This collection is usually bound by the 11th rib, and it may be triangular (doge's cap), crescent shaped, or semicircular

Page 3: Journal Medscape EDIT

.

Diagram of the right upper quadrant shows the location of a circular collection of air projected over the liver interposed between the anterior liver surface and the anterior thoracic and abdominal wall seen on a plain supine abdominal radiograph.

The most common cause of a spontaneous pneumoperitoneum is the introduction of air through

the female genital tract (see the images below).

Pneumoperitoneum . Upright chest radiograph shows a large pneumoperitoneum outlining the spleen and the superior surface of the liver.

Pneumoperitoneum . (Left) Sagittal sonogram through the liver shows a comet-shaped artifact due to free air in the anterior subphrenic space, which causes shadowing. Also note the free peritoneal fluid. (Right) A transverse oblique sonogram through the midabdomen shows dilated loops of small bowel with a streak of free fluid between the bowel loops.

3

Page 4: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoperitoneum. Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan through the liver shows a collection of air anterior to the liver. Also note the air surrounding the gallbladder and the leakage of water-soluble contrast material from a perforated duodenal ulcer.

Preferred examination

CT is regarded as the criterion standard for the detection of a pneumoperitoneum; it provides

exquisite scans, and it is theoretically more sensitive than plain abdominal radiography. However, CT is

not always required when a pneumoperitoneum is suspected. Despite the contrary consensus, the accuracy

of supine abdominal radiography closely approximates CT when the entire abdomen is imaged.

US is usually the first investigation performed in emergent patients. US is a noninvasive test that

is widely available and is particularly valuable in children, pregnant women, and individuals of

reproductive age. Some studies have reported sensitivities greater than that of plain abdominal

radiography in the diagnosis of a pneumoperitoneum.[1, 2] Compared with plain radiography, US

examination also has the advantage of depicting other changes, such as free abdominal fluid and

inflammatory masses.[3, 4, 5]

Limitations of techniques

Free intraperitoneal air is often missed with plain radiology. The failure to detect free air is more a

function of lacking standardization and of inadequate technique. In most institutions, a kidney, ureter,

bladder (KUB) image is used instead of other images in cases of suspected pneumoperitoneum. These

4

Page 5: Journal Medscape EDIT

radiographs are insufficient for the diagnosis of a pneumoperitoneum because the uppermost portion of

the peritoneal cavity, which reveals important signs, may be excluded from the examination.

If proper technique is applied, contrast-enhanced studies and CT scanning can be avoided.

Although a CT scan is considered a criterion standard in the diagnosis of a pneumoperitoneum, it is

expensive in terms of both radiation burden and cost.

With both conventional radiology and CT, oral contrast material is used to opacify the lumen of

the GI tract and to demonstrate a bowel leak. The leak may be too small, or it may have sealed, and

extravasation of the contrast material may not occur. When a distal small or large bowel perforation is

suspected, one major limitation of the use of oral contrast material is that several hours may be required to

opacify the bowel. Thus, the randomness of bowel opacification, the difficulty encountered in securing

the cooperation of a sick patient, and the relative clinical urgency for diagnosis limit the value of oral

contrast enhancement.

In addition, oral contrast material may obscure relevant clinical information, such as the presence

of an appendicolith and bowel hemorrhage, although these may not be relevant in terms of bowel

perforation. Although US is a noninvasive and relatively inexpensive test, it remains operator dependent,

and it has limitations in patients who are obese and in those with a large amount of intra-abdominal gas. [6,

7]

Abnormal abdominal gas collections are classified according to the anatomic location, which is

often the key to the differential diagnosis.

Extraluminal gas

Extraluminal gas may be involved in pneumoperitoneum or gas within an abscess or fistulous

tract. Gas within a pelvic abscess usually indicates that the abscess is of GI origin. Gas within an abscess

5

Page 6: Journal Medscape EDIT

of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is unusual. Gas within the paracolic gutter is usually associated with

GI perforation. Diverticulitis may produce extraluminal gas trapped within the adjacent mesentery.

Intraluminal gas

Intraluminal gas may be normal or abnormal. The gas may be intratumoral (within a neoplasm in

association with infection or bowel communication), intramural, within a paralyzed loop of bowel, within

an obstructed Meckel diverticulum (secondary infection), or within the biliary tree. Normal intraluminal

gas can be differentiated by the presence of gas within the bowel lumen in association with peristalsis that

is visible on fluoroscopy or ultrasonography (US).

Intraparenchymal gas

Within the portal vein, intraparenchymal gas may sometimes be seen on real-time US as gas

microbubbles moving through the liver or as linear collections of hyperlucent branching gas at the

periphery of the liver. Gas may be seen in a liver abscess. The differential diagnosis between liver

microabscesses and microcalcification may be difficult to make with US. In most other organs,

intraparenchymal gas usually indicates an abscess.

Intratumoral gas

Intratumoral gas typically occurs in a gastric leiomyoma or leiomyosarcoma; in such cases, the gas

may be seen extending from the lumen of the stomach into the tumor. Intratumoral gas may also be seen

in hepatic tumors after chemoembolization; in such cases, differentiation of the gas from an abscess may

be difficult with the use of images alone.

Intramural gas

Intramural gas may be related to ischemia. US features that are distinctive of infection include

high-amplitude echoes that do not change with the patient's position or with peristalsis. Adjacent bowel

6

Page 7: Journal Medscape EDIT

wall thickening is often present. Crohn disease and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection are less common

causes of intramural bowel gas.

Pneumatosis coli is often better shown with CT than with US. Acute emphysematous cholecystitis,

which often occurs in diabetic patients and the elderly, shows evidence of intramural gas on US.

Confusion may occur with mural calcification, which is often curvilinear but which does not have the

characteristic ring-down artifact associated with air bubbles. Adenomyosis of the gallbladder may cause a

comet-tail artifact.

The presence of free intra-abdominal gas usually indicates a perforated abdominal viscus. The

most common cause is perforation of a peptic ulcer. Patients with such conditions need urgent surgery.

Occasionally, patients with vague abdominal symptoms have unequivocal features of a

pneumoperitoneum, but there is little clinical evidence of peritonism. These patients have a

pneumoperitoneum without peritonitis. They are treated expectantly and do not require surgery.

Male versus female anatomy

In males, the peritoneal cavity is completely closed, but in females, the peritoneal cavity

communicates with the genital tract via the fallopian tubes, which provide a potential pathway for suction

of air into the peritoneal cavity. The fallopian tubes also constitute a possible pathway of infection from

the genital tract.

Peritoneal reflections and ligaments

Various peritoneal reflections and ligaments interrupt the peritoneal cavity.

At the level of the umbilicus, the obliterated fetal urachus (median umbilical cord) forms a shallow

ridge that extends cephalad from the dome of the urinary bladder to the umbilicus. The median umbilical

7

Page 8: Journal Medscape EDIT

cords, which represent the obliterated umbilical arteries, extend from the internal iliac arteries to the

umbilicus in the shape of an inverted V.

The falciform ligament is a double layer of peritoneum that forms anteriorly near the midline

between the umbilicus and the esophagus. It passes backward and splits to enclose the liver. Superiorly,

peritoneal layers form the triangular and coronary ligaments, which enclose the bare area of the liver. The

layers of peritoneum investing the liver unite on its visceral surface to form the lesser omentum, which

passes from the liver to the esophagus, the stomach, and the first part of the duodenum. The free edge of

the lesser omentum between the porta hepatis and duodenum contains the portal vein; the hepatic artery

and common bile duct lie anteromedially and anterolaterally, respectively.

The layers of the lesser omentum split to enclose the stomach and then reunite to form the greater

omentum and gastrosplenic and lienorenal ligaments. In the free edge of the falciform ligament lies the

ligamentum teres (the obliterated fetal left umbilical vein), which passes into the groove between the

quadrate lobe and the left lobe of the liver.

The transverse colon is enclosed by the transverse mesocolon, which is attached posteriorly to the

anterior aspect of the pancreas.

The lesser sac lies behind the lesser omentum and the stomach. The spleen, which is attached by

the gastrosplenic and lienorenal ligaments, forms the left wall of the lesser sac. The right of the sac

communicates with the main peritoneal cavity via the foramen of Winslow.

These reflections and peritoneal spaces are important radiologically because it is here that air

accumulates in a pneumoperitoneum.

8

Page 9: Journal Medscape EDIT

Special concerns

Most pregnant women (90%) experience significant improvement or complete resolution of peptic

ulcer disease. Complications of peptic ulcer disease such as hemorrhage and perforation are rare in

pregnancy. Radiology has a role in the evaluation of suspected perforation, but the use of conventional

radiography involves irradiation of the fetus. With lateral chest radiography, the fetus is excluded from

the direct beam. US is readily available in most centers and can be used in the pregnant patient.

In a series of 100 patients, Woodring and Heiser found that use of upright lateral chest radiographs

led to a confirmation of pneumoperitoneum in 98% of patients [8] ; by contrast, use of standard upright

posteroanterior (PA) radiographs resulted in a confirmation in only 80% of patients, suggesting that

upright lateral views are more sensitive than standard upright PA chest radiographs.

Negative findings support conservative management. For cases in which there is strong clinical

suspicion but the radiographic findings are negative, the decision to use further imaging such as CT or to

perform surgical exploration must be made on an individual basis. Although a negative lateral chest

radiograph excludes a pneumoperitoneum in most cases, the physician should not hesitate to perform a

full abdominal series when the index of clinical suspicion is high; in such instances, the benefit outweighs

the disadvantage of the small radiation dose to the fetus.

Pneumoperitoneum has a variety of causes, including pneumatosis intestinalis. Pneumatosis

intestinalis may be associated with benign causes or may occur in patients with intra-abdominal cancer.

Lee and associates retrospectively and blindly reviewed 84 patients with pneumatosis intestinalis to

determine the overall proportion of clinically worrisome and benign pneumatosis intestinalis occurring in

patients with cancer and to evaluate associated risk factors on CT. The study revealed that benign

pneumatosis intestinalis was more prevalent than clinically worrisome pneumatosis intestinalis. The study

also revealed that CT features of mesenteric stranding, bowel thickening, bowel dilation, portomesenteric

9

Page 10: Journal Medscape EDIT

venous gas and ascites, and localization confined to the small bowel were worrisome signs. The location

and pattern, such as linear, cystic, or both, were also important.[9]

Radiography

Optimal radiographic technique is important with a suspected abdominal perforation. At least 2

radiographs should be obtained, including a supine abdominal radiograph and either an erect chest image

or a left lateral decubitus image. The patient should remain in position for 5-10 minutes before a

horizontal-beam radiograph is acquired. A lateral chest x-ray has been found to be even more sensitive for

the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum than an erect chest x-ray. The images below depict radiographic

technique.

Pneumoperitoneum .Plain radiograph of the right upper quadrant shows a tiny streak of air under the diaphragm due to a pneumoperitoneum.

Pneumoperitoneum .Upright chest radiograph shows a large collection of air under both hemidiaphragms due to perforated duodenal ulcer.

10

Page 11: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoperitoneum .Upright chest radiograph shows a large pneumoperitoneum outlining the spleen and the superior surface of the liver.

Pneumoperitoneum .Images in a 24-year-old man known to have Crohn disease who presented with acute abdominal pain. (Left) Supine radiograph of the right upper quadrant shows a vague lucency overlying the liver. (Right) Lateral decubitus radiograph shows an obvious pneumoperitoneum. Note also the air-fluid levels within the bowel due to associated ileus. At surgery, a perforated terminal ileum secondary to Crohn disease was diagnosed.

11

Page 12: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoperitoneum .This elderly patient was knocked down by a car in a motor vehicle accident. Her main complaint was hip pain. Plain abdominal radiograph of the pelvis confirms the presence of a fracture of the neck of the left femur, but also note a bowel relief sign (arrow). At surgery, a perforation of the small bowel secondary to blunt abdominal trauma was confirmed.

Pneumoperitoneum .Coned view of the lower abdomen shows the lateral umbilicus sign (arrow), which is a sign of a large pneumoperitoneum on a plain abdominal radiograph. Note also the bowel relief sign.

12

Page 13: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoperitoneum . Coned view of the lower abdomen shows the urachus sign (arrows), which is another sign of a large pneumoperitoneum on a plain abdominal radiograph.

Diagrams of the right upper quadrant show the location of the oblong collection of air in the right subhepatic space seen on a plain supine abdominal radiograph.

Pneumoperitoneum . Supine abdominal radiograph shows an elliptical collection of air within the subhepatic space. Note also the bowel relief sign.

13

Page 14: Journal Medscape EDIT

Diagram of the right upper quadrant shows a triangle-shaped collection of air in the Morison pouch, as seen on a plain supine abdominal radiograph. This collection is usually bound by the 11th rib, and it may be triangular (doge's cap), crescent shaped, or semicircular.

Pneumoperitoneum .Plain abdominal radiograph of a patient with a pneumoperitoneum shows a triangular collection of air in the Morison pouch (solid arrows). Also note the bowel relief sign (open arrows).

(Left) Supine chest radiograph shows a tiny collection of air under the diaphragm (arrow) in a patient with pneumoperitoneum. (Right) Supine abdominal radiograph shows a triangular collection of air in the Morison pouch (arrow).

14

Page 15: Journal Medscape EDIT

Diagram of the right upper quadrant shows the location of a circular collection of air projected over the liver interposed between the anterior liver surface and the anterior thoracic and abdominal wall seen on a plain supine abdominal radiograph.

A 66-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with urinary retention and was being examined for prostatic pathology. While he was in the ward, he had a sudden onset of acute abdominal pain. Findings on this supine radiograph were interpreted as being normal, but note the pear-

shaped lucency projected over the liver indicative of a pneumoperitoneum.

A 49-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with acute abdominal pain. Findings from the initial plain abdominal radiographs were interpreted as being normal. Because the cause of his abdominal pain was not clear, an upper GI series performed with water-soluble contrast material was requested. (Left) Radiograph obtained early in the study shows no leakage, but note the triangular collection of air within the Morison pouch. (Right) When this earlier plain radiograph was interpreted, the collection of air within the Morison pouch was seen; this had escaped detection earlier (arrow).

15

Page 16: Journal Medscape EDIT

Supine abdominal radiograph in a 26-year-old man with known Crohn disease who presented with acute abdominal pain. Findings on the initial plain radiographs were interpreted as normal. Radiograph shows barium within the stomach, but note air within the lesser sac and in

the Morison pouch. At surgery, a perforated duodenal ulcer was confirmed.

Supine abdominal radiograph shows a falciform ligament (arrow).

Pneumoperitoneum. (Left) Upper GI barium series in a patient who presented with acute abdominal pain. Note the duodenal ulcer crater and air within the ligamentum teres (arrow). (Right) Follow-up barium study shows that the barium leak and air within the ligamentum teres (arrow) persists.

16

Page 17: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoperitoneum .Plain abdominal radiograph in a 24-year-old man who presented with acute abdominal pain 24 hours after undergoing an upper GI series with barium. Radiography was performed to evaluate peptic ulcer disease. Note that barium has been released into the anterior subphrenic space (arrows). Note also the delineation of the falciform ligament of the escaped barium. Also seen is barium within the grooves of mesenteric vessels (arrows). The bowel relief sign is obvious.

Pneumoperitoneum .Left, Posteroanterior (PA) chest radiograph in a patient receiving long-term steroid therapy who presented with breathlessness but no abdominal symptoms. A large pneumoperitoneum is present, and because of the lack of abdominal signs, she was observed. (Right) Two weeks later, a repeat anteroposterior (AP) chest radiograph was obtained because the patient felt vaguely unwell, although she had no abdominal signs. Note the air-fluid level to the left of the upper lumbar spine and left basal pleural effusion. At surgery, a retroperitoneal abscess secondary to a colonic perforation was diagnosed. Patients who are diabetic or those taking steroids are prone to silent perforations.

17

Page 18: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoperitoneum .This patient was unwell after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Plain abdominal radiograph shows a falciform ligament (arrow) and the bowel relief sign. The patient was treated conservatively because of a lack of abdominal signs. He recovered fully.

Pneumoperitoneum .Plain abdominal radiograph in a patient in whom a retropneumoperitoneum developed after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Pneumoretroperitoneum. Chest radiograph (left) and plain radiograph (right) show surgical emphysema and retroperitoneal air secondary to a retroperitoneal bowel perforation.

18

Page 19: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoperitoneum .Image shows bowel perforation after bowel infarction. Note the large pneumoperitoneum and air within the portal venous radicals.

Pneumoperitoneum mimics. Pneumatosis coli secondary to necrotizing enterocolitis.

Pneumoperitoneum mimics. Plate atelectasis at the right lung base mimics a small pneumoperitoneum.

Pneumoperitoneum mimics . Large bulla at the base of the right lung mimics a large pneumoperitoneum.

19

Page 20: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoperitoneum, mimics. Image shows colonic interposition. Note the haustra.

Pneumoperitoneum mimics . Air-containing bowel loops within a Morgagni hernia.

Pneumoperitoneum mimics . Air within the portal venous radicals secondary to bowel infarction is an ominous sign in adult patients.

Pneumoperitoneum mimics . Image shows air within the biliary tree after papillotomy.

Some authors suggest a complete free-air series, which includes the acquisition of a left lateral

decubitus image after the patient is in the proper position for 20 minutes and the acquisition of an upright

radiograph after 5 minutes and a supine radiograph after 1 minute. The total examination time is therefore

26 minutes, which becomes cumbersome for patients who are ill and in pain.

20

Page 21: Journal Medscape EDIT

The plain radiographic signs of a pneumoperitoneum have been classified into those of a small

pneumoperitoneum and those of a large pneumoperitoneum associated with more than 1000 mL of free

air.[10, 11, 12, 13]

Signs of a large pneumoperitoneum

Signs of a large pneumoperitoneum include the following:

The football sign, which usually represents a large collection of air within the greater sac. The air

seems to outline the entire abdominal cavity. Some authorities apply the term football sign to the

air surrounding the falciform ligament, which looks like the laces of a football.

The gas-relief sign, the Rigler sign, and the double-wall sign are all terms applied to the

visualization of the outer wall of bowel loops caused by gas outside the bowel loop and normal

intraluminal gas.[14] Free intraperitoneal gas and intraperitoneal fluid in excess of 1000 mL are

usually required to elicit this sign.

The urachus is a vestigial peritoneal reflection not normally seen on a plain abdominal radiograph.

It has the same opacity as other soft tissue intra-abdominal structures, but when a

pneumoperitoneum occurs, air outlines the urachus. The urachus is then seen as a thin midline

linear structure in the lower abdomen proceeding cephalad from the dome of the urinary bladder.

The base of the urachus may be slightly thicker than the apex.

The lateral umbilical ligaments, which contain the inferior epigastric vessels, may become visible

as an inverted V sign in the pelvis as a result of a large pneumoperitoneum.

A telltale triangle sign represents a triangular pocket of air between 2 loops of bowel and the

abdominal wall.

Scrotal air may be seen in children as a result of peritoneal intrascrotal extension (through patent

process vaginalis).

21

Page 22: Journal Medscape EDIT

Free air under the diaphragm may depict the diaphragmatic muscle slips as arcuate soft tissue

bands, arching parallel to the diaphragmatic dome.

Gas within the lesser sac may be present, particularly with a perforation of the posterior wall of the

stomach.

Air may be present around the spleen.

Signs of partial large bowel obstruction with a sigmoid diverticulum perforation may occur in

association with signs of a pneumoperitoneum.

On a left lateral decubitus radiograph, free air is apparent around the inferior edge of the liver,

which forms the least dependent part of the abdomen in that position. In obese patients,

particularly women, the least dependent part may be overlying the hips, a point at which free air

may be present.

Right upper quadrant gas

Menuck et al published an important report in 1976 describing the importance of right upper

quadrant gas, which is best seen in a small pneumoperitoneum on supine radiographs.[15]

An oblong saucer-shaped or cigar-shaped collection of air may be present in the subhepatic space

inferior to the lower edge of the liver.

A triangular collection of air may be seen in the Morrison pouch, which is bound by the left 11th

rib. The configuration of this air collection varies and may be semicircular, crescent shaped, or triangular.

This has been likened to a doge's cap.

A round, oval, or pear-shaped collection of air may be projected over the liver shadow between the

ventral liver surface and the anterior thoracic or abdominal wall. This collection may be solitary or

present in several smaller locules. The liver shadow normally has no gas overlying it, though such gas

does occur in association with the following conditions: colonic interposition, subphrenic abscess, liver

22

Page 23: Journal Medscape EDIT

abscess with gas-forming organisms, the presence of portal venous gas, the presence of biliary gas, and as

an effect of chemoembolization.

Parahepatic gas bubbles may be seen lateral to the right edge of the liver.

The cupola sign (saddlebag or moustache sign) represents gas trapped under the central tendon of

the diaphragm.

Small collections of air around the periduodenal area normally occur with a retroperitoneal

perforation in the second part of the duodenum, but it has also been described with a pneumoperitoneum.

The falciform ligament is a linear soft tissue opacity coursing vertically between the umbilicus and

the ligamentum teres notch in the inferior surface of the liver. The falciform ligament may be thin and of

uniform diameter, but it is occasionally a linear lobulated structure that may be several millimeters thick.

Gas within the ligamentum teres notch may be seen as an inverted V–shaped collection on the

undersurface of the liver at the junction of the right and left lobes.

Gas within the ligamentum teres is seen as a vertical slitlike or oval lucency lying between the

11th and 12th right ribs and 2.5-4 cm lateral to the spinal edge. The gas collection may be 2-7 mm wide

and 6-20 mm long.

Air in the gallbladder fossa is a recently described sign that is better demonstrated with CT than

with radiography.

Use of contrast medium in the evaluation of suspected perforation

Not infrequently, patients with an acute abdomen and suspected perforation have no free gas, as

assessed on plain radiographs. The differential diagnosis usually includes acute cholecystitis, pancreatitis,

and a perforated ulcer.

23

Page 24: Journal Medscape EDIT

To aid in the examination, about 50 mL of water-soluble contrast agent is given orally or via a

nasogastric tube with the patient lying right-side down. Fluoroscopy may be used to examine the patient;

spot images are obtained after the patient stays in the right lateral decubitus position.

In patients with a perforated ulcer, contrast material may leak into the peritoneum. Fluoroscopy is

not always essential, and plain abdominal radiography may be performed. Patients with pancreatitis may

also be examined with this technique; in these patients, an edematous, stretched duodenal loop may be

visualized. The use of ionic water-soluble contrast medium should be avoided because patients may

inadvertently inhale it.

Degree of confidence

Plain radiography remains the mainstay in imaging an acute abdomen, including a perforated

abdominal viscus. As little as 1 mL of free gas can be detected on a plain radiograph—either an erect

chest image or a left lateral decubitus abdominal image.[16] Pneumoperitoneum is detectable in 56% of

patients by using a supine abdominal image. In approximately one half of patients with a

pneumoperitoneum, gas overlies the right upper quadrant.

False positives/negatives

Mimics of a pneumoperitoneum include the following:

Colonic interposition between the superior surface of the liver and the diaphragm. Chilaiditi

syndrome) (see the following image)

24

Page 25: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoperitoneum mimics .Image shows colonic interposition. Note the haustra.

Undulating diaphragm

Basal atelectasis situated above and parallel to the diaphragm, which is bandlike and has a

normally aerated lung above and below (see the following image)

Pneumoperitoneum mimics . Plate atelectasis at the right lung base mimics a small pneumoperitoneum.

Basal lung bulla (see the image below)

25

Page 26: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoperitoneum mimics . Large bulla at the base of the right lung mimics a large pneumoperitoneum.

Subphrenic abscess caused by gas-forming organisms

Pyonephrosis caused by gas-forming organisms

Supradiaphragmatic curvilinear pulmonary collapse

Cysts of pneumatosis coli (see the following image)

Pneumoperitoneum mimics . Pneumatosis coli secondary to necrotizing enterocolitis.

Subphrenic fat has a curvilinear lucency, which is usually in a more lateral position

26

Page 27: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoretroperitoneum

Mimics of ligamentum teres fissure gas include the following :

Air in the biliary tree

Pneumoperitoneum mimics . Image shows air within the biliary tree after papillotomy.

Air in the portal venous system

Pneumoperitoneum mimics . Air within the portal venous radicals secondary to bowel infarction is an ominous sign in adult patients.

Fat in the fissure of ligamentum teres

27

Page 28: Journal Medscape EDIT

Computed Tomography

CT can readily depict a pneumoperitoneum, as in the images below. Animal experiments have

revealed that CT can depict as little as 5 cm of cubic free air in the peritoneum. In a supine position,

anteriorly placed gas can generally be differentiated from gas within the bowel. With any perforation, an

outpouring of inflammatory fluid of varying quantities can be observed within the peritoneum; the

amount depends on the site of perforation. This fluid is again readily detected with CT. The cause of the

perforation can sometimes be diagnosed. Such perforations may be associated with a carcinoma,

diverticulitis, or appendicitis.[17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23]

Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan through the liver shows a collection of air anterior to the liver. Also note the air surrounding the gallbladder and the leakage of water-soluble contrast material from a perforated duodenal ulcer.

Nonenhanced axial CT through the tip of the liver shows leakage of oral contrast material (arrows) from a perforated gastric ulcer.

28

Page 29: Journal Medscape EDIT

Posterior perforation of a duodenal ulcer showing inflammatory fluid around the gallbladder mimicking acute cholecystitis.

Degree of confidence

CT is regarded as a criterion standard in the assessment of a pneumoperitoneum.

CT is useful in identifying even a small amount of extraluminal gas, particularly when plain

radiographic findings are nonspecific. CT is less dependent on the patient's position and the technique

used.

False positives/negatives

CT does not always help in differentiating between pneumoperitoneum of benign cause and

pneumoperitoneum caused by a condition that requires urgent surgery. The anteriorly located gas from a

pneumoperitoneum is sometimes difficult to differentiate from gas in a distended bowel. In addition, with

CT, it is difficult to localize the site of the perforation.

The presence of free gas in the peritoneum is nonspecific. It may be the result of bowel

perforation, recent surgery, or peritoneal dialysis.

29

Page 30: Journal Medscape EDIT

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Pneumoperitoneum can be seen as an area of low signal intensity on images obtained with all sequences.

Pneumoperitoneum can be an incidental finding on MRI because MRI is not the primary imaging

modality. The presence of bowel peristalsis can blur the bowel wall.

Ultrasonography

On sonograms, pneumoperitoneum appears as a linear area of increased echogenicity with distal

ring-down or reverberation artifact, as depicted in the images below. A localized gas collection related to

bowel perforation may be detected, particularly if it is adjacent to other abnormalities seen on US, such as

bowel wall thickening.[24]

Pneumoperitoneum. (Left) Sagittal sonogram through the liver shows a comet-shaped artifact due to free air in the anterior subphrenic space, which causes shadowing. Also note the free peritoneal fluid. (Right) A transverse oblique sonogram through the midabdomen shows dilated loops of small bowel with a streak of free fluid between the bowel loops.

30

Page 31: Journal Medscape EDIT

Pneumoperitoneum. Scanogram obtained prior to CT shows the falciform ligament (arrow) and leakage of oral contrast medium (L) secondary to a pneumoperitoneum.

The following US findings have been described:

Total sound reflection may occur at the interface of soft tissue and/or air.

Reverberation of the sound beam may occur between gas and the transducer.

High-amplitude linear echoes with distal artifactual reverberation echoes, which may be periodic,

may be observed. The reverberation echoes are "dirty" in comparison with clear shadowing from

calculi.

Small reverberation artifacts have a characteristic comet-tail appearance.

Small gas collections may show little or no distal reverberation artifacts with standard abdominal

transducers (3.5-5.0 MHz).

At times, the small gas bubbles are difficult to differentiate from microabscesses or

microcalcification.

The location of the gas collection is often the key to the differential diagnosis.

Pneumoperitoneum is best seen around the perihepatic space in the supine or lateral decubitus

position.

Gas collection in the paracolic gutter is usually caused by GI perforation.

Gas in a fistulous tract is usually associated with Crohn disease.

31

Page 32: Journal Medscape EDIT

Gas within a pelvic abscess is usually of GI origin; gas is unusual in PID.

In cases of diverticulitis, extraluminal gas may be trapped within the adjacent mesentery.

Portal venous gas may be seen as discrete gas bubbles moving toward the periphery of the liver

with the bloodstream.

Apart from gas in the liver, gas within other organs is usually secondary to an abscess.

Normal intra-abdominal gas is intraluminal, with the surrounding bowel usually seen and

associated with bowel peristaltic movements.

In the appropriate clinical setting, the presence of gas bubbles within a complex fluid collection

suggests an abscess.

Degree of confidence

US is readily available in most centers. It is less expensive than CT, and it is particularly valuable

in patients for whom a radiation burden is a major concern. These patients include children, pregnant

women, and individuals of reproductive age.

However, US remains operator dependent, and it is of limited use in obese patients and in those

with a large amount of intra-abdominal gas. Knowledge of the abdominal anatomy, particularly peritoneal

reflection, is critical for an accurate interpretation of gas in an abnormal location. US should not be

considered definitive in excluding a pneumoperitoneum.

False positives/negatives

Mimics of a pneumoperitoneum include shadowing from a rib, ring-down artifacts from adjacent

air-filled lung, and colonic gas anterior to the liver-colonic interposition. Gas in the right upper quadrant

may be confused with emphysematous cholecystitis, mural calcification, gallbladder calcification,

porcelain gallbladder, adenomyosis, air within an abscess, tumor, biliary gas, or air within the portal vein.

32

Page 33: Journal Medscape EDIT

Intraperitoneal gas is frequently more difficult to detect than gas in abnormal locations because of

adjacent intraluminal gas. However, even a small amount of free air can be detected anteriorly or

anterolaterally between the abdominal wall and adjacent liver, where intestinal loops are not usually

found. Differentiating extraluminal gas from intramural or intraluminal gas is difficult.

References

1. Braccini G, Lamacchia M, Boraschi P. Ultrasound versus plain film in the detection of pneumoperitoneum. Abdom Imaging. Sep-Oct 1996;21(5):404-12. [Medline].

2. Chen SC, Yen ZS, Wang HP. Ultrasonography is superior to plain radiography in the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum. Br J Surg. Mar 2002;89(3):351-4. [Medline].

3. Baker SR. Plain films and cross-sectional imaging for acute abdominal pain: unresolved issues. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. Apr 1999;20(2):142-7. [Medline].

4. Grassi R, Pinto A, Rossi G. Conventional plain-film radiology, ultrasonography and CT in jejuno- ileal perforation. Acta Radiol. Jan 1998;39(1):52-6. [Medline].

5. Ottinger D, Swanson JR. Diagnosing intestinal perforation: a new approach. Am J Perinatol. May 2008;25(5):291-3. [Medline].

6. Stafford RE, McGonigal MD, Weigelt JA. Oral contrast solution and computed tomography for blunt abdominal trauma: a randomized study. Arch Surg. Jun 1999;134(6):622-6; discussion 626-7. [Medline].

7. Stafford RE, McGonigal MD, Weigelt JA. Oral contrast solution and computed tomography for blunt abdominal trauma: a randomized study. Arch Surg. Jun 1999;134(6):622-6; discussion 626-7. [Medline].

8. Woodring JH, Heiser MJ. Detection of pneumoperitoneum on chest radiographs: comparison of upright lateral and posteroanterior projections. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 1995;165(1):45-7. [Medline].

9. Lee KS, Hwang S, Rúa SM, Janjigian YY, Gollub MJ. Distinguishing benign and life-threatening pneumatosis intestinalis in patients with cancer by CT imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. May 2013;200(5):1042-7. [Medline].

10. Williams N, Everson NW. Radiological confirmation of intraperitoneal free gas. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. Jan 1997;79(1):8-12. [Medline].

11. Cho KC, Baker SR. Depiction of diaphragmatic muscle slips on supine plain radiographs: a sign of pneumoperitoneum. Radiology. May 1997;203(2):431-3. [Medline].

12. Cho KC, Baker SR. Visualization of the extrahepatic segment of the ligamentum teres: a sign of free air on plain radiographs. Radiology. Mar 1997;202(3):651-4. [Medline].

13. Radin R, Van Allan RJ, Rosen RS. The visible gallbladder: a plain film sign of pneumoperitoneum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 1996;167(1):69-70. [Medline].

14. Markogiannakis H, Fili K, Spaniolas K, Bizimi V, Katsiva V, Theodorou D. Rigler sign: an underappreciated alert for pneumoperitoneum. Am J Surg. Apr 22 2008;[Medline].

15. Menuck L, Siemers PT. Pneumoperitoneum: importance of right upper quadrant features. Am J Roentgenol. Nov 1976;127(5):753-6. [Medline].

16. Miller RE. The technical approach to the acute abdomen. Semin Roentgenol. Jul 1973;8(3):267-79. [Medline].

17. Baker SR. Unenhanced helical CT versus plain abdominal radiography: a dissenting opinion. Radiology. Oct 1997;205(1):45-7. [Medline].

33

Page 34: Journal Medscape EDIT

18. Balthazar EJ, Moore SL. CT evaluation of infradiaphragmatic air in patients treated with mechanically assisted ventilation: a potential source of error. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Sep 1996;167(3):731-4. [Medline].

19. Chen CH, Huang HS, Yang CC. The features of perforated peptic ulcers in conventional computed tomography. Hepatogastroenterology. Sep-Oct 2001;48(41):1393-6. [Medline].

20. Chen CH, Huang HS, Yang CC. The features of perforated peptic ulcers in conventional computed tomography. Hepatogastroenterology. Sep-Oct 2001;48(41):1393-6. [Medline].

21. Earls JP, Dachman AH, Colon E. Prevalence and duration of postoperative pneumoperitoneum: sensitivity of CT vs left lateral decubitus radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 1993;161(4):781-5. [Medline].

22. Gayer G, Jonas T, Apter S. Postoperative pneumoperitoneum as detected by CT: prevalence, duration, and relevant factors affecting its possible significance. Abdom Imaging. May-Jun 2000;25(3):301-5. [Medline].

23. Sajith A, O'Donohue B, Roth RM, Khan RA. CT scan findings in oesophagogastric perforation after out of hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Emerg Med J. Mar 2008;25(2):115-6. [Medline].

24. Chen SC, Wang HP, Chen WJ. Selective use of ultrasonography for the detection of pneumoperitoneum. Acad Emerg Med. Jun 2002;9(6):643-5. [Medline].

34