Upload
tess98
View
264
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Road Map to Fusion
Presentation to the NCOAUG
Jeff Budge, Sr Technology Director, CSC Global Oracle Practice
March 12, 2007
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 2
With all of the activity in the Oracle space….
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 3
…many customers are searching for the right path forward…
What steps can I take to prepare for Fusion?
Should we upgrade our current applications with Fusion Applications coming down the road?
Will my necessary, in-house developed application fit in a Fusion world?
What can I do to prepare my organization and resources?
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 4
CSC’s Road Map to Fusion plots a course to enable your company to control it’s Oracle Fusion destiny!
CSC’s Road Map to Fusion
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 5
What the Road Map Will Do?
A Road Map to Fusion brings specialists to conduct an in-depth evaluation of:
• Business strategies, requirements, and challenges
• Prioritization, Business Value, ROI
• Application architecture and required integration with internal and external systems
• Technology and infrastructure architecture
A Road Map to Fusion brings specialists to conduct an in-depth evaluation of:
• Business strategies, requirements, and challenges
• Prioritization, Business Value, ROI
• Application architecture and required integration with internal and external systems
• Technology and infrastructure architecture
To DeliverTo Deliver
A Road Map strategy that articulates the best
options for the client
A Road Map strategy that articulates the best
options for the client
CSC’s Road Map to Fusion
The Road Map to Fusion An Example Journey
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 7
SiebelMrkting
PSSales
JDE WMS
OracleOM
CustomDistrib
PSFIN
Applications
Oracle, Unix DB2, NT MainframeInfrastructure
Customer Lead to Cash Business Process
SuppliersCustomers
Partners Analytics & Collaboration
Lead Opportunity ATP Manage Ship InvoiceProcess Steps
John E. Doe Doi, John E. Jon Doe Doe, Johnny ------- Jon A. DoeData
Today’s Starting Point
SiebelAnalytics
CustomDW
BusinessObjects
Oracle Reports
CustomReports
PS EPMInfo. Access
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 8
SiebelMrkting
PSSales
JDE WMS
OracleOM
CustomDistrib
PSFIN
Applications
Oracle, Unix DB2, NT MainframeInfrastructure
Customer Lead to Cash Business Process
SuppliersCustomers
Partners Analytics & Collaboration
Lead Opportunity ATP Manage Ship InvoiceProcess Steps
John E. Doe Doi, John E. Jon Doe Doe, Johnny ------- Jon A. DoeData
All steps (BPEL Process Manager)Orchestration
All master data (Oracle Data Hubs)Master Data
First Steps toward Fusion
SiebelAnalytics
CustomDW
BusinessObjects
Oracle Reports
CustomReports
PS EPMInfo. Access
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 9
SiebelMrkting
PSSales
JDE WMS
OracleOM
CustomDistrib
PSFIN
Applications
Oracle, Unix DB2, NT MainframeInfrastructure
Customer Lead to Cash Business Process
SuppliersCustomers
Partners Analytics & Collaboration
Lead Opportunity ATP Manage Ship InvoiceProcess Steps
John E. Doe Doi, John E. Jon Doe Doe, Johnny ------- Jon A. DoeData
All steps (BPEL Process Manager)Orchestration
All master data (Oracle Data Hubs)Master Data
Evolve to a Canonical Data Model
Canonical (Standardized) Data Model (Fusion Model)
SiebelAnalytics
CustomDW
BusinessObjects
Oracle Reports
CustomReports
PS EPMInfo. Access
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 10
SiebelMrkting
PSSales
JDE WMS
OracleOM
CustomDistrib
PSFIN
Applications
Oracle, Unix DB2, NT MainframeInfrastructure
Customer Lead to Cash Business Process
SuppliersCustomers
Partners Analytics & Collaboration
Lead Opportunity ATP Manage Ship InvoiceProcess Steps
John E. Doe Doi, John E. Jon Doe Doe, Johnny ------- Jon A. DoeData
All steps (BPEL Process Manager)Orchestration
All master data (Oracle Data Hubs)Master Data
Address the Information Access Challenge
Canonical (Standardized) Data Model (Fusion Model)
SiebelAnalytics
CustomDW
BusinessObjects
Oracle Reports
CustomReports
PS EPMInfo. AccessXML
PublisherInfo. AccessXML
PublisherXML
PublisherEnterprise Business Intelligence (BI Suite EE)
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 11
SiebelMrkting
PSSales
JDE WMS
OracleOM
CustomDistrib
PSFIN
Applications
Oracle, Unix DB2, NT MainframeInfrastructure
Customer Lead to Cash Business Process
SuppliersCustomers
Partners Analytics & Collaboration
Lead Opportunity ATP Manage Ship InvoiceProcess Steps
John E. Doe Doi, John E. Jon Doe Doe, Johnny ------- Jon A. DoeData
All steps (BPEL Process Manager)Orchestration
Canonical (Standardized) Data Model (Fusion Model)Master Data
Oracle, Unix DB2, NT MainframeInfrastructure John E. Doe Doi, John E. Jon Doe Doe, Johnny ------- Jon A. DoeEnterprise System Mgmt (Oracle GRID)Infrastructure
Deploy on GRID
SiebelAnalytics
CustomDW
BusinessObjects
Oracle Reports
CustomReports
PS EPMInfo. AccessInfo. Access Enterprise Business Intelligence (BI Suite EE)
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 12
Applications
Oracle, Unix DB2, NT MainframeInfrastructure
Customer Lead to Cash Business Process
SuppliersCustomers
Partners Analytics & Collaboration
Lead Opportunity ATP Manage Ship InvoiceProcess Steps All steps (BPEL Process Manager)Orchestration
John E. Doe Doi, John E. Jon Doe Doe, Johnny ------- Jon A. DoeData Canonical (Standardized) Data Model (Fusion Model)Master Data
Applications SiebelMrkting
PSSales
JDE WMS
OracleOM
CustomDistrib
PSFIN
Fusion Applications
Fusion Applications
Fusion Applications
Fusion Applications
Fusion Applications
Fusion Applications
Upgrade to Fusion Applications
John E. Doe Doi, John E. Jon Doe Doe, Johnny ------- Jon A. DoeEnterprise System Mgmt (Oracle GRID)Infrastructure
SiebelAnalytics
CustomDW
BusinessObjects
Oracle Reports
CustomReports
PS EPMInfo. AccessInfo. Access Enterprise Business Intelligence (BI Suite EE)
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 13
EBS 11i.10 FIN upgrade
Div 1Psft 8.8 Upgrade
Fusion Integration and Orchestration
Fusion HCM Upgrade
Fusion FIN Upgrade
EBS 12 FIN Upgrade
Div 2EBS 12 Upgrade
Psft 8.8 Upgrade
Fusion Integration and Orchestration
Div 3ERP Implementation
Fusion Integration and Orchestration
Fusion SCM Upgrade
Fusion HCM Upgrade
Fusion FIN Upgrade
Fusion SCM Upgrade
Fusion HCM Upgrade
Fusion FIN Upgrade
General Dynamics Road Map
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 14
FY 2007 FY 2008
Business Value:
Reduce COGS
Reduce SG&A
Ent Integration
Example Division Level Milestone Plan
BPEL Integration Project – Phase 1
Identity Management
EBS 11i.10 FIN upgrade
Psft 8.8 Upgrade Fusion HCM Upgrade
Fusion FIN Upgrade
SCM Implementation
CRM Process Standardization CRM Implementation
BPEL Integration Project – Phase 2
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 15
Productivity Weight Weighted ScorePlanning 95% 30% 29%Coding 80% 20% 16%Testing 90% 20% 18%Deployment 80% 20% 16%Re-Use 60% 10% 6%
85%
Efficiency SummaryEfficiency Rating 85%Efficiency Rating* 38%
Red = Non-existent or non-deployed, Yellow = Present but needs Improvement, Green = Present and operating properly, Gray = Not evaluated
Current State Future State
Example Current to Future State Model
•Efficiency Rating criteria spans the architecture, SDLC, and PM dimensions
Assessment Dimensions
- Architecture
- SDLC- Project / Program Mgmt
Arc
hite
ctur
eSD
LCPr
ojec
t / P
rogr
am M
gmt
Enterprise Architecture
Business Architecture
Application Architecture
Account Management
Program Management
Project Management
ConceptualArchitecture
Frameworks
RoadmapsPAC / DPAC
ARC
Enterprise Process Model
Re-Use Leadership
Enterprise Data Model
BusinessArchitecture
Project Bus Process Model
LogicalArchitecture
PhysicalArchitecture
Re-Use Process
User Experience
Requirements
Vision & Strategy
Design Development Testing Deployment Operations
Measurement, Feedback and Improvement
Project Vetting
Detail Project Plans
Project Tracking
Process Approach
ProjectEstimates
IT PortfolioManagement
IT PortfolioManagement
EstimatingTemplates
Architecture Skill Development
Efficiency / Quality Oversight
ProjectPrioritization
Change Management
TechnologyStandards
TechnicalArchitecture
Staffing Management
ProgramTracking
Architecture Center of Excellence
Thin IT PMOPM Training
& Mentoring
ConceptualArchitecture
Frameworks
RoadmapsPAC / DPAC
ARC
Enterprise Process Model
Re-Use Leadership
Enterprise Data Model
BusinessArchitecture
Project Bus Process Model
LogicalArchitecture
PhysicalArchitecture
Re-Use Process
User Experience
Requirements
Vision & Strategy
Design Development Testing Deployment Operations
Measurement, Feedback and Improvement
Project Vetting
Detail Project Plans
Project Tracking
Process Approach
ProjectEstimates
IT PortfolioManagement
IT PortfolioManagement
EstimatingTemplates
Architecture Skill Development
Efficiency / Quality Oversight
ProjectPrioritization
Change Management
TechnologyStandards
TechnicalArchitecture
Staffing Management
ProgramTracking
Architecture Center of Excellence
PM Training & Mentoring
Thin IT PMO
Metrics / Perf. Tracking
Metrics / Perf. Tracking
Metrics / Perf. Tracking
AcceptanceManagement
DocumentManagement
Risk Management
Issue Management
ProjectPlanning
FinancialManagement
SOW / Project Charter
Metrics / Perf. Tracking
Metrics / Perf. Tracking
Metrics / Perf. Tracking
AcceptanceManagement
DocumentManagement
Risk Management
Issue Management
ProjectPlanning
FinancialManagement
SOW / Project Charter
Enterprise Architecture
Business Architecture
Application Architecture
Account Management
Program Management
Project Management
The Road Map to Fusion
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 17
Four Assessment Tools
• Oracle Fusion Health Check– 1 week elapsed time (1-2 days onsite), high level current state assessment
resulting in a scorecard and a milestone plan
• Oracle and CSC RTF Insight– 3 weeks elapsed time (2-4 days onsite), current state assessment resulting in a
scorecard, high-level recommendations by area, and a milestone plan
• CSC Road Map to Fusion– 4-5 weeks elapsed time (8-10 days onsite), assessment and planning resulting
in a scorecard, detailed recommendations by area, benefit analysis, and a milestone plan
• CSC Enterprise Systems Optimization– 8-10 weeks elapsed time, detailed assessment including APER application
portfolio assessment resulting in a scorecard, detailed recommendations by area, benefits analysis, application and environment consolidation recommendations, and a milestone plan
The Road Map to Fusion
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 18
Control Your Oracle Fusion Destiny!
CSC’s Road Map to Fusion
CSC’s Road Map to Fusion
Experience. Results.
CSC.COM CONSULTING SYSTEMS INTEGRATION OUTSOURCING
The Road Map to Fusion Assessment Tools
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 21
Oracle Fusion Health Check
Fusion Component Status Comments
Applications
PeopleSoft HR/PayrollAfter upgrade, Release 8.9 is a Fusion launchable release
PeopleSoft CRMRelease 8.8 and 8.9 are Fusion launchable releases
JDE One World FinancialsXE is supported, but not a Fusion launchable release; get to EnterpriseOne 8.11/8.12
Oracle OTCRelease 11.5.10 is a Fusion launchable release
Architecture
SOAHave SOA architecture strategy and WBI tools in place
BPELImplement BPEL strategy. BPEL is the foundation for Fusion.
ReportingConsider using XML Publisher (Fusion reporting tool) for new reports
SecurityConsider Identity Management as an integral part of the architecture.
The Road Map to Fusion
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 22
Oracle and CSC RTF Insight
• Understanding of RTF Program
• Agreement on Focus Areas & Agenda
DiscoveryWorkshop
SolutionDesign
RoadmapPresentation
Invite
Roadmap to Fusion InsightRoadmap to Fusion Insight
• Business and IT Objectives, Challenges, & Needs
• Current and Future Landscape
• Business and IT Objectives
• Applications & Technology Roadmap
• Findings and Recommendations
• Next Steps
FusionUpdates
• Updates to Roadmap
The Road Map to Fusion
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 23
CSC Road Map to Fusion
Activities Work Products
Weeks
1 2 3 4
Step 1:Roadmap Prep
• Mobilize Project Resources, Conduct Project Team Kickoff
• Prepare Agendas and Content, Identify Sites
• Schedule Assessment Sessions
• Kick-off meeting materials to include objectives, overview, and project time line
• Participant lists and session schedules
• Session agendas and materials
Step 2:Conduct Assessment Sessions
• Conduct Assessment Sessions
• Organize and Prepare Findings
• Completed Sessions with Documented Summary of Findings, Current State Issues
Step 3:Compile Results
• Evaluate findings and develop recommendations for customized roadmap
• Evaluation Reports to include recommended middleware solutions, business transformation, technology positioning
Step 4:Review & Present Results
• Define value and benefits of recommended solutions
• Conduct Presentation of Findings
• Finalized Deliverables and Presentation to Executive Management
• Identify next steps
The Road Map to Fusion
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 24
Migration PlanningDesign and Priority
SettingDirection SettingDiscoveryOrientation Phase
Aspiration and Background
Current State
Potential Future State
Visioning
AlternativeEnd State
Program Management
Personnel & culture
Processes
Mgt. & Control
Performance
Systems
Current situation
Vision
Program Management
Personnel & culture
Processes
Mgt. & Control
Performance
Systems
Current situation
Vision
Supporting Technologies
DesiredEnd State
Implementation Roadmap
RequiredBusiness
Capabilities
Technology Initiatives
1 2 3 4 5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
StrategicImperatives
Vision
BusinessObjectives
Discovery
Business Process:
Technology:
Customers serviced locally
Customers serviced globally
Prices/discounts agreed to locally
Prices/discounts agreed to globally
Products from different BUs sold
to the same end customer
Products from different BUsare rarely sold to the same customers
Parts used across BUs
Parts are unique to BUs
Parts/materials tracked locally
Parts/materials tracked globally
IT as a differentiator
IT as a cost of doing business
Diverse product mix
Homogenous products
IT as an investment
IT as a cost
People and part certifications
managed locally
People and part certifications managed centrally
Organization:
Beliefs, Values, Norms:
Management & Control Systems:
People/ Resources
move between groups
Admin., HR, Finance share
info
Common beliefs/culture
Strong corporate
culture
BUs managed as a portfolio of companies
Leadership is dictated
Manage by the numbers
People/Resources stay within a single BU/group
Admin., HR, Finance don’t share info - also looking at doing it with design engrs
Collaboration occurs globally (collab is closer with customers than internally)
BUs have unique cultures
Limited corporate culture
Enterprise managed as a single company
Leaders provide guidance
Manage by process
Collaboration occurs locally
X – Current position O – desired position 3/07 discussion with Doug McCurry and Brian Cawley
X
O
X
X
X
X
X
X
O
O
O
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O
O
O
Organization
Competitors
ValueProposition
$$
Customers
Channels
Organization
Competitors
ValueProposition
$$
Customers
Channels
Diverse Products
HomogeneousProducts
Global Customers
Location Specific Customers
Multiple InstanceSingle Vendor
Multiple InstanceMultiple Vendors
Single InstanceMulti-tiered:Top Tier – Single VendorBottom – Multiple Vendors
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Q1
05
Q2
05
Q3
05
Q4
05
Q1
06
Q2
06
Q3
06
Q4
06
Q1
07
Q2
07
Q3
07
Q4
07
Q1
08
Q2
08
Q3
08
Q4
08
Q1
09
Q2
09
Q3
09
Q4
09
Release 4
Release 3
Release 2
Release 1
Business Case
Industry Trends / Best Practices
InitiativeQ2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12
2004Q1
2002 2003
IT Roadmap + Methodology
Claims Cost Containment
Client Centric Databases
New Claims System
Direct Response/Service Center
WIP Client System
Business Management Information
IT Program Generation Facilities
GUI Interfaces for all Operations
Migration from XYZ to DB2
Collaborative Approach
Development
Market Pressures
Constraints
Many Enterprise System Versions
“Mosaic” of Systems
Common Enterprise System Version
Standardized Enterprise Platform
Optimized Enterprise Solution
ESO is an Enterprise Assessment that assists clients determine the most appropriate Enterprise System architecture for their Organization
ESO (Enterprise Systems Optimization)
The Road Map to Fusion
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 25
CSC’s Approach Drives Strategic Alignment and Increased Business Value…
Migration PlanningDesign and Priority
SettingDirection SettingDiscovery
Aspiration and Background
Current State
Potential Future States
Visioning
AlternativeEnd States
Program Management
Personnel & culture
Processes
Mgt. & Control
Performance
Systems
Current situation
Vision
Supporting Technologies
DesiredEnd State
Implementation Roadmap
RequiredBusiness
Capabilities
Technology Initiatives
1 2 3 4 5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
StrategicImperatives
Vision
BusinessObjectives
Discovery
Business Process:
Technology:
Customers serviced locally
Customers serviced globally
Prices/discounts agreed to locally
Prices/discounts agreed to globally
Products from different BUs sold
to the same end customer
Products from different BUsare rarely sold to the same customers
Parts used across BUs
Parts are unique to BUs
Parts/materials tracked locally
Parts/materials tracked globally
IT as a differentiator
IT as a cost of doing business
Diverse product mix
Homogenous products
IT as an investment
IT as a cost
People and part certifications
managed locally
People and part certifications managed centrally
Organization:
Beliefs, Values, Norms:
Management & Control Systems:
People/ Resources
move between groups
Admin., HR, Finance share
info
Common beliefs/culture
Strong corporate
culture
BUs managed as a portfolio of companies
Leadership is dictated
Manage by the numbers
People/Resources stay within a single BU/group
Admin., HR, Finance don’t share info - also looking at doing it with design engrs
Collaboration occurs globally (collab is closer with customers than internally)BUs have unique cultures
Limited corporate culture
Enterprise managed as a single company
Leaders provide guidance
Manage by process
Collaboration occurs locally
X – Current position O – desired position 3/07 discussion with Doug McCurry and Brian Cawley
X
O
X
X
X
X
X
X
O
O
O
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O
O
O
Organization
Competitors
ValueProposition
$$
Customers
Channels
Diverse Products
HomogeneousProducts
Global Customers
Location Specific Customers
Multiple InstanceSingle Vendor
Multiple InstanceMultiple Vendors
Single InstanceMulti-tiered:Top Tier – Single VendorBottom – Multiple Vendors
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Q1
05
Q2
05
Q3
05
Q4
05
Q1
06
Q2
06
Q3
06
Q4
06
Q1
07
Q2
07
Q3
07
Q4
07
Q1
08
Q2
08
Q3
08
Q4
08
Q1
09
Q2
09
Q3
09
Q4
09
Release 4
Release 3
Release 2
Release 1
Business Case
Industry Trends / Best Practices
InitiativeQ2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12
2004Q1
2002 2003
IT Roadmap + Methodology
Claims Cost Containment
Client Centric Databases
New Claims System
Direct Response/Service Center
WIP Client System
Business Management Information
IT Program Generation Facilities
GUI Interfaces for all Operations
Migration from XYZ to DB2
Collaborative Approach
Development
Orientation Phase
The Road Map to Fusion
© 2007 Computer Sciences Corporation KCRUG 26
ESO Deliverables
Future State Organization
Model
Implementation Approach & Roadmap
Business Case /
Benefits
Business / IT Strategy
Requirements
End State Vision
Future State Application and
Supporting Technology Models
• Business / Technology Strategy
• Conclusions
• Consolidation Approach
These deliverables provide the cornerstone to align the business and IT vision required to build the enterprise solution architecture
required to drive business benefits
The Road Map to Fusion