ISO 50001/SEP Superior Energy Performance at …...Schneider Electric – Sustainability Services – 2014 19 Phase 4: Readiness Used internal auditors from ISO 9001 and 14001 teams

Design the Strategy | Deliver Efficiency | Sustain Results

ISO 50001/SEP

Superior Energy Performance at

Schneider Electric

Schneider Electric – Sustainability Services – 2014 2

Schneider Electric – the global specialist

in energy management

billion € sales (last twelve months)

of sales in new economies(last twelve months)

people in 100+ countries

of sales devoted to R&DResidential 9%

Utilities & Infrastructure 24%

Industrial & machines 22%

Data centres 16%

Non-residential buildings 29%

North

America

23%Asia Pacific27%Rest of

World18%

Western

Europe

32%

Balanced geographies – FY 2011sales

Diversified end markets – FY 2011 sales


3 Demographics

72 buildings

55 locations

12 M ft2

105 people

7 Regional managers

26 facility managers

79 techs

Across North America

Across all Businesses

Enterprise-wide Facility Management


Why Implement SEP / ISO 50001?

Efficient Framework for Energy Management Program

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Plan

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Do

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Check

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Act

Corporate Self-Defined

Energy Management Program ISO 50001 Structure

SEP / ANSI/MSE 50021

ISO50001


Why Implement SEP?


1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Plan

Lighting Upgrades

HVAC Adjustments

Assessment

Variable Speed

Drives

Metrics

Policies

Reporting Communication

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Do

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Check

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Act

Corporate Self-Defined

Energy Management Program ISO 50001 Structure


1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Plan

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Do

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Check

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Act

ISO 50001 Structure

Energy Management

Program Objectives:

Certification

Best Practice

Standardization

Measured and Verified

Results

Why Implement SEP?



7

Target 11 sites to be

complete by the end of

2014

Target sites with

ISO140001 certification

(Clovis)

Exposure to

Management system

Seat at table

Verified results by 3rd

party

Benchmarking for

Enterprise

Documented Results

SEP / ISO 50001 @ Schneider Electric


1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Plan

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Do

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Check

1. ~~~~~~

2. ~~~~~~

3. ~~~~~~

4. ~~~~~~

Act

SEP Structure

When do Savings Start:

Why Implement SEP?



SEP Results at Schneider Electric?



●Planning Session: determine the Energy

Management Team

● Implementation: 5 Phases-

#1 Gap Analysis

#2 Facility Energy Review

#3 EnMS Construction

#4 Readiness Review and Internal Audit

#5 ISO Certification Audit

● 6 – 18 month Process

Implementation Process


Energy Management Team

● First Step towards ISO 50001

● Should include:

● Someone with experience with other ISO standards

● Someone who is charged with improving energy KPI

● A third party who can provide direction


Preferred Team Members

● Facility Manager/Energy Manager

● Plant Manager

● Quality Manager (ISO 9001 Rep)

● Environmental Manager (ISO 14001 Rep)

● Procurement Manager

● Maintenance Manager

● Manager(s) of Significant Energy Use(s)

13

Phase 1 – Gap Analysis

●Determine which current practices can

be adopted to meet the standard

●Develop an implementation plan

●Determine Phase 3 required effort

© SchnSceihndeeidre Er Ellecectrtriicc –– Sus 2012tain ability Services – 2014


Phase 2 – Energy Review

● Conduct utilities analysis

● Identify Significant Energy Users (SEUs)

● For each SEU

● Develop Energy

Conservation Measures

● Create metering plan

● Identify operating parameters

15

● Build procedures for a fully functional system

● Provide awareness & training

● Ensure energy efficiency targets have a plan for achievement

Phase 3 – EnMS Construction


16

Phase 4 – Readiness Prep

●Second Gap Analysis to ensure all requirements are

met

●Conduct an Internal Audit

●Hold Management Review

● Review Internal Audit Results

● Review Energy Performance Indicators (EnPI)


17

● Stage 1 Audit

● Higher level audit to ensure

readiness for Stage 2

● Stage 2 Audit

● Ensure the EnMS meets

the intent of the standard

● Deeper dive into procedures

● Present corrective actions for major and

minor findings

Phase 5 – Certification Audits



●Identified the Paint Line as the Significant Energy User (SEU) Wash Process

Powder Coat

Curing

●Identified WAGES metering needs

Phase 1 and 2:

Gap Analysis and Energy Review

Phase 3:

EnMS Construction

Bridged the gap between process and energy Implemented Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs)

VFDs on wash pumps Turned off IR oven (10% of gas use) Hook burn-off temperature set to 1,500 degrees when 1,200 degrees

would suffice


Phase 4: Readiness

●Used internal auditors from ISO 9001 and 14001 teams

Gave an energy fundamentals course

●Corrective Actions Identified

Operating temperatures for ovens were not in procedures

Calibration issues for gauges

Auto-date feature on some documents

Purchasing had not adopted new procedures

Issues with energy awareness

●Well prepared for certification audits

Only minor findings in Phase 5: Certification”


Outcomes

Created foundation for continuous improvement

Competitive advantage through reduced costs

Qualified for Platinum SEP with 15.5% reduction

Identified utility meter malfunction


Invoice Analysis – Meter Data vs Invoice Data

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

01-Jan 01-Feb 01-Mar 01-Apr 01-May 01-Jun 01-Jul 01-Aug 01-Sep 01-Oct 01-Nov 01-Dec 01-Jan 01-Feb 01-Mar

Inv. Gas

Paintline Meter

Space HeatMeter


Continued Results SEU

Add VFD’s to paint line ovens

Change wash chemicals and reduce water usage

and water temperature

Investigating changing specification of paint to

different process to change

Reuse waste heat on paint line to pre-heat

combustion air and heat the manufacturing space


Performance after Certification


4

Schneider Electric North America Results

Enterprise wide energy management information system that aggregates energy

and resource data from multiple systems for reporting , analysis and

communication

YTD vs. 2013

Central 1

Central 2

Northeast

South

Southeast

West

0%

2013 YTD vs. 2011

-14%

)% Central 1

( -12%

nc

e Central 2-10%

orm

a Northeast-8%

f South

re -6%

P Southeast

gy -4%

West

ne

r

-2%

E

-14%

-12%

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

En

erg

y P

erf

orm

an

ce (

%)

201

NAM Regional Energy Performance

NAM Regional Energy Performance [2013 vs. 2011]


Schneider Electric North America Results

Enterprise wide energy management information system that aggregates energy

and resource data from multiple systems for reporting , analysis and

communication

Questions

Comments

Documents

ISO 50001/SEP Superior Energy Performance at …...Schneider Electric – Sustainability Services – 2014 19 Phase 4: Readiness Used internal auditors from ISO 9001 and 14001 teams