Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Infant Mortality – Impact on overall Child Mortality
in Kansas
Effective Strategies to reduce infant mortality
July 17, 2009
Presentation Goals:
1. Describe the impact of fetal and infant deaths on the overall child mortality rate for the US and Kansas
2. Identify the risk factors contributing to infant deaths due to conditions originating in the perinatal period.
3. Conduct effective reviews of infant deaths using lessons learned from FIMR
Infant Mortality
• Definition: The death of any live born infant prior to his/her first birthday.
• “The most sensitive index we possess of
social welfare . . . ”
Julia Lathrop, Children’s Bureau, 1913
Definition of Live Birth
‘‘Live Birth’’ means the complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of a product of human conception, irrespective of the duration of pregnancy, which, after such expulsion or extraction, breathes, or shows any other evidence of life such as beating of the heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, whether or not the umbilical cord has been cut or the placenta is attached.
Source: K.S.A. 1995 Supplement 65-2401, subsection (2), amended and effective July 1, 1995.
Definition of Fetal Death
‘‘Stillbirth’’ means any complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of a product of human conception the weight of which is in excess of 350 grams, irrespective of the duration of the pregnancy, resulting in other than a live birth as defined in this act and which is not an induced termination of pregnancy.
Source: K.S.A. 1995 Supplement 65-2401, subsection (3), amended and effective July 1, 1995.
Recommended Reporting of Fetal Deaths
The 1992 Revision of the Model State Vital Statistics Act and Regulations recommends:
‘‘Each fetal death of 350 grams or more, or if weight is unknown, of 20 completed weeks gestation or more, calculated from the date last normal menstrual period began to the date of delivery, is reported to the office of Vital Records.
Variation in Fetal Death Reporting across States
– Eleven areas report all periods of gestation– 25 areas report gestation periods of 20 weeks or
more– 13 areas specify birth weight of 350 grams or more or
20 weeks of gestation or more; – 1 area specifies 20 weeks or more or birth weight of
400 grams – 1 area specifies 20 weeks or more or birth weight of
500 grams – 1 area specifies 16 weeks of gestation or more – 1 area specifies 5 months of gestation or more.
Additional Definitions
• Perinatal Death– Fetal deaths (stillbirths) plus infant
deaths under 7 days
• Neonatal Death– Live birth dying within 28 days
• Post-Neonatal Death– Live birth dying between 28 days
and 1 year
Source: National Center for Health Statistics, CDC
US Infant Mortality Rate
0
5
10
15
20
25
HP 2010 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
US 20 12.6 10.6 9.2 7.6 7.3 7.2 7.2 7.1 6.9 6.8 7 6.9 6.8 6.8 6.7
1970 1980 1985 1990 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Dea
ths
per
100
0 liv
e b
irth
s
US Infant Death Rates 1995 - 2006
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
2006 = 28, 527 infant deaths
US Fetal Death Rates 1995 - 2005
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
2005, 25,894 Fetal Deaths
Maternal Mortality
• 569 Maternal Deaths in the US in 2006
• Rate = 13.3/100,000 live births
• White Rate = 9.5/100,000
• Hispanic Rate = 10.5/100,000
• Black Rate = 32.7/100,000
• Disparity Ratio for Black to White of 3.5/1
Total US Deaths of Children ages 0 – 19 years
9%
26%
5%
7%
53%
0 - 1 yr
1 yr - 4 yr
5 yr - 9 yr
10 yr - 14 yr
15 yr - 19 yr
53,501 Child deaths in 2005, 0 – 19 years28,440 or 53% are infant under 1
Kansas: Percent of Child Deaths by age at Death
0-1 1 -19-
In 2005, 547 Child Deaths0 – 19. 294, or 54% wereInfants under one
Infant mortality rates by maternal race/ethnicityUS, 1996-2005
All race categories exclude Hispanics. An infant death occurs within the first year of life. Source: National Center for Health Statistics, period linked birth/infant death data. Retrieved April 8, 2009, from www.marchofdimes.com/peristats.
Infant mortality rates by maternal race/ethnicityUS, 2005
All race categories exclude Hispanics. An infant death occurs within the first year of life. Source: National Center for Health Statistics, period linked birth/infant death data. Retrieved April 8, 2009, from www.marchofdimes.com/peristats.
Neonatal and postneonatal mortality ratesUS, 1960-2005
A neonatal death occurs in the first 28 days of life. A postneonatal death occurs between 28 days and one year of life. Source: National Center for Health Statistics, period linked birth/infant death data. Retrieved April 8, 2009, from www.marchofdimes.com/peristats.
Preterm births among singleton deliveriesUS, 2006
Preterm is less than 37 completed weeks gestation. Source: National Center for Health Statistics, final natality data. Retrieved April 8, 2009, from www.marchofdimes.com/peristats.
State Rankings for Overall Infant Mortality
• Mississippi (11.3)• Louisiana (10.1)• South Carolina (9.4)• Alabama (9.4)• Delaware (9.0)• Tennessee (8.9)• North Carolina (8.8)• Ohio (8.3)
• Georgia (8.2)• Oklahoma (8.1)• West Virginia (8.1)• Indiana (8.0)• Arkansas (7.9)• Michigan (7.9)• Missouri (7.5)• Virginia (7.5)
Kansas (7.4)
Source: National Kids Count Database
Kansas Infant Mortality: Black and White
0
5
10
15
20
25
Black White
Dea
ths
per
100
0 li
ve b
irth
s
Source: 1995-2007 The Kansas Department of Health and Environment Vital Records
Kansas’ Disparity Ratio
0
5
10
15
20
25
Black 19.2 16.5 13.8 12.1 15.4 15.6 16.6 15.6 16 17 18
White 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.6 6.3 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.4
95-97 96-98 97-99 98-00 99-01 00-02 01-03- 02-04- 03-05- 04-06- 05-07-
B/W ratio 2.8
Source: 1995-2007 The Kansas Department of Health and Environment Vital Records
Kansas Ranks 47th among States for Black Infant Mortality Rate
States:States: Black IMR 05Black IMR 05 Rank:Rank:
Delaware 18.9 50
Michigan 18.3 49
Wisconsin 17.7 48
Kansas 17.6 47
Mississippi 17.2 46
DC* 17
Indiana 17 45
Ohio 16.9 44
North Carolina 16.4 43
Illinois 16.4 43
Colorado 16.3 41
USA 13.7
Source: National Center for VS, CDC
Percent of all Kansas Births by Race, 2007
• Total births: 41,951
• White births: 30,170 (72%)
• Black births: 2,856 (6.8%)
• Hispanic Moms, all races: 6,676 (15.9%)
• Other/Multiple races, non-hispanic: 5.3%
Source: 1995-2007 The Kansas Department of Health and Environment Vital Records
Percent of Births by Race and EthnicityUS Compared to Kansas
7.10%
15.30%
4.10%
73.40%
White Black Hispanic Other
14.1%
23.8%
7.00%
55.1%
Kansas Infant Mortality trendRates by Race & Ancestry
0
5
10
15
20
Black 12.1 15.4 15.6 16.6 15.6 16 17 18
Hispanic 5.6 5.9 7.3 7.9 7.1 7.3 6.6 7.7
White 6.8 6.6 6.3 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.4
98-00 99-01 00-02 01-03- 02-04- 03-05- 04-06- 05-07-
Source: 1995-2007 The Kansas Department of Health and Environment Vital Records
Dea
ths
per
10 0
0 li
ve
bir
ths
Leading Causes of Infant Death (2007)from Death Certificates
3%
15%
20%
Other
SIDS
CongenitalAnomalies
PerinatalConditions
Source: 1995-2007 The Kansas Department of Health and Environment Vital Records
62%
Preterm and Low Birth Weight in KansasPercent of all Live Births
1995 2005 2010 US Objective
Preterm 9.9% 12.2% 7.6%
Low Birth Weight
6.4% 7.2% 5.0%
Source: March of Dimes, Peristats http://www.marchofdimes.com/peristats/
Low Birth Weight
Premature Birth
Fatherlesshouseholds
Poverty
Racism
Limited Access to Care
Under-Education
Family Support
Genetics Nutrition
Weathering
Stress
Smoking Substance Use
Poor Working Conditions
Bad Housing
Bad NeighborhoodsUnemployment
Hopelessness
Infant Mortality
With permission from Arthur James, MD
When Vital Statistics alone cannot tell us the story . . . .
. . . Communities turn to FIMR to tell us how and why babies are dying
Addison and Aiden were the most popular names given to
newborns by Kansas parents in 2008.
Source: 1996-2009 The Kansas Department of
Health and Environment
Fetal Infant Mortality Review1988 - 2009
• A process that tells us How and Why babies die in a community
Data Gathering Data Gathering Changes in Changes in
Community CommunitySystemsSystems
The Cycle ofThe Cycle of
ImprovementImprovement
Case Review Case Review Community Community
Action Action
National Fetal and Infant Mortality Review (NFIMR)
NFIMR is a Collaborative Effort between the:
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
• Federal Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration (MCHB, HRSA)
FIMR 1988
FIMR Today
Over 240 projects in 42 states
Characteristics of State FIMR Programs
• Over 240 Local FIMR projects in 42 States
• 25 States have a State Coordinator with training and technical assistance available
• Most FIMR’s are administered through local public health
The FIMR Process
• FIMR brings a multidisciplinary community team together to examine confidential, de-identified cases of infant deaths.
Review Team
FIMR: Two Tiered Process
CRT
Case Review Team
CAT
Community Action Team
Selected Components
of FIMR
Confidentiality
• FIMR cases are de-identified so that the names of families, providers and institutions are confidential – the FIMR focus is on improving systems, NOT assigning blame.
FIMR Focuses on Systems
Each FIMR case review provides an opportunity to improve communication among medical, public health and human service providers and develop strategies to improve services and resources for women, children and families.
“The process that brings together people to learn from the story of a family
that experienced a fetal or infant loss helps awaken both commitment and
creativity. The stories illustrate community needs that are concrete, local and significant. The interaction
among diverse community participants generates ideas for action that might lie beyond the imagination and power of an
individual provider or agency.”
Seth Foldy, MD Former Commissioner of Health, Milwaukee WI
FIMR Includes a Family Perspective
Home Interview• Gives insight into
the mother’s experience before and during pregnancy
• Conveys the mother’s story of her encounters with local service systems
“Maternal interviews give a voice to the disenfranchised in my
community, those without clout or power. FIMR provides a rare
opportunity for the ‘providers’ in a community to hear from the
consumers.”
Patt Young, FIMR Interviewer, Alameda/Contra Costa Counties, CA
FIMR Promotes Broad Community Participation
• FIMR is a community coalition that can represent all ethnic and cultural community views and becomes a model of respect and understanding.
“The Growing Into Life FIMR Task Force…has built respect and friendship among races,
between classes, around language, and among those of
differing political and economic interests.”
Karen Papouchoado, Former MayorAiken, SC
FIMR is Action-Oriented.
FIMR leads to multiple creative community actions to improve resources and service systems for women, infants and families.
FIMR’s Strength
• Access to medical records
• Home Interviews (Qualitative Data)
• Community specific determinants of Infant Mortality
Use of Data
• Death certificates provide an overview of all infant deaths
• When matched with birth certificates, we know maternal characteristics, prenatal care, and labor complications
• FIMR provides information on more specific psychosocial issues, gaps in care, factors which contribute to infant death in specific communities
Evaluation of FIMR Programs Nationwide
Methods
• 193 participating communities• Cross-sectional observational study
(Telephone interview, written survey & site visits)– Communities with FIMR– Communities with Perinatal Initiative – Communities with both (FIMR & PI)– Communities with neither
Results
FIMR Programs contribute significantly to improvements in
systems of health care for pregnant women and infants
through enhanced public health activities in Communities.
FIMR-Specific Influences
• Data assessment and analysis
• Client services and access
• Quality improvement for systems of care
• Partnerships and collaboration
• Population advocacy and policy development
Results
“[The FIMR program] …also creates a setting and a set of concrete activities wherein everyone has a contribution to make and everyone learns from the process. The case study findings indicate that because the FIMR process extends beyond problem identification to promote problem solutions, observable changes in practice and programs occur; ‘things get fixed’ and participants are inspired to take further action.”
• Source: Women's and Children's Health Policy Center, Johns Hopkins University. The evaluation of FIMR programs nationwide: early findings. [Online, 2002]. Available from: http://www.jhsph.edu/wchpc/pub/Brochure.pdf.
FIMR as part of other MCH Initiatives
– Vital Statistics– PRAMS (Pregnancy Risk Assessment
Monitoring)– PPOR (Perinatal Periods of Risk)– CDR (Child Death Review)– MMMS (Maternal Mortality Surviellance)– BRFSS (Behavioral Risk Factor survey
System)
Interaction of State Public Health and Local FIMR Projects• Technical Assistance• Grant of Authority/Legislation• Data Management
Technical Assistance
• Hands on Training: – Team development– Recruiting members for review and action teams– Case Abstraction– Access to Medical records– Home Interviews/Bereavement
• On site consultation for CRT and CAT– Connect sites with “best practices” and solutions from
other communities– Assist teams with developing recommendations – Fidelity to Program: confidentiality, forms, etc.
Technical Assistance
• Monthly Network Meeting– Dialog and common understanding of issues
related to infant mortality and the FIMR process
– in-services on factors associated with infant morbidity/mortality and maternal health
– Create and maintain a base of support for FIMR personnel
• Annual Training
Grant of Authority/FIMR Legislation
• The laws and regulations relevant to the process of fetal and infant mortality review are found primarily in state rather than local or federal laws. All states have laws that afford immunity to those participating in certain types of reviews.
• Many states have other regulations that permit access to medical and vital statistics records for “investigations for the benefit of the health of the public”.
Michigan’s Grant of Authority
• Michigan’s Public Health Code provides authorization for local FIMR project staff to collect protected health information from covered entities on MDCH’s behalf for the purpose of “public health investigation” (Surveillance) of fetal and infant deaths.
• 45 CFR 164.512 (b) 45 164.501 of the Privacy Rule permits disclosure to “a public health authority that is authorized by law to collect or receive such information for the purpose of preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability . . . .vital events such as births or deaths, and the conduct of public health surveillance”.
New York State Public Health Law
§ 206.1(j) Commissioner; general powers and duties
»1. The commissioner shall:
» (j) cause to be made such scientific studies and research, which have for their purpose the reduction of morbidity and mortality and the improvement of the quality of medical care through the conduction of medical audits within the state. In conducting such studies and research, the commissioner is authorized to receive reports on forms prepared by him and the furnishing of such information to the commissioner, or his authorized representatives, shall not subject any person, hospital, sanitarium, rest home, nursing home, or other person or agency furnishing such information to any action for damages or other relief.
New York State Public Health Law
§ 206.1(j) Commissioner; general powers and duties (cont.)
»Such information when received by the commissioner, or his authorized representatives, shall be kept confidential and shall be used solely for the purposes of medical or scientific research or the improvement of the quality of medical care through the conduction of medical audits. Such information shall not be admissible as evidence in any action of any kind in any court or before any other tribunal, board, agency or person.
Texas FIMR Legislation
• Enacted in September of 2007, amends chapter 674 of Health and Safety Code.
• Creates a FIMR as a unit of local government
• States who may establish a FIMR team• Prescriptive of membership• Authorizes disclosure of information to review teams (includes medical, social, mental health)
• Gives teams immunity from subpoena and discovery
FIMR and HIPAA• The National Fetal and Infant Mortality Review, in
collaboration with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Hogan and Hartson, LLP, developed "The Fetal and Infant Mortality Review Process: The HIPAA Privacy Regulations." This detailed monograph on FIMR and HIPAA is designed to help local and state FIMR programs understand the regulations. A PDF document is available at the NFIMR website:
www.acog.org
Data Management
• Administers and manages Statewide database for local FIMR’s – TA – Data analysis on request– Aggregate Annual Report
• Examples of Database– Web Based: BASINET (created by Florida HS)– NFIMR: ACCESS database, free to states
FIMR and CDR common goal:
Local, multidisciplinary review aids in better understanding how to
prevent future deaths and improve lives of babies, children, and
families.
• CDR is now mandated or enabled by law in 39 states. • 22 are housed out of their State Health Department.• 37 states now have local review teams.
• 48 states review deaths through age 17.
• Half review deaths to all causes.
• Median state funding level is $150,000, with limited local funding
Review preventable deaths
Review mostly child abuse deaths
Transitioning to prevention
No review team(s)
Case Inclusion Criteria
FIMR• Reviews deaths of
infants born live who do not reach their first birthday
• Select cases of fetal death (<400 grams or 20 weeks gestation)
CDR• Age of child < 18 • All unexplained deaths• All fatal abuse and
neglect deaths• All homicides and
suicides• All accidents/injuries
Effective Reviews of Perinatal/Neonatal Deaths
• Get the right People to the table . . .
• Gather enough data to give a clear picture of maternal health history
• Identify the risks, gaps in care and services
• Put findings into action to improve care and resources for women, infants, and families
Team Composition
FIMR• Medical Expertise
– OB– Peds– Pathology– ED– Family Practice
CDR
• Law enforcement• Prosecutors• Social Services/FIA
Team Composition
FIMR• Other Health Care
Providers– Nurses– Social Workers– Dietitian– Discharge
Planning– Home Care
CDR
• Emergency Medical Personnel
• Medical Examiners
Team Composition
FIMR
• Human Service Providers– Child Welfare
Agencies– Mental Health– Substance
Abuse
CDR
• Department of Corrections
• Housing Authority• Transportation
Authority
Team Composition
FIMR
• Public Health– Medicaid– WIC– Family Planning– MSS/ISS– Outreach
Workers
CDR
• Schools District• Juvenile Court• Child Care
Licensing
Team Composition
FIMR/CDR
• Community Leaders– Mayor, City Council, County Executive– Business Leaders, Chamber of Commerce– Clergy– Civic Groups (Kiwanis, Junior League)
Team Composition
FIMR
• SIDS/OID Programs• Advocacy Groups
– March of Dimes– Healthy
Mothers/Healthy Babies
– Family Support Groups
CDR
• State and Local Safe Kids Coalitions
Effective Reviews of Perinatal/Neonatal Deaths
• Get the right People to the table . . .
• Gather enough data to give a clear picture of maternal health history
• Identify the risks, gaps in care and services
• Put findings into action to improve care and resources for women, infants, and families
Sources of information for Maternal Health History
• Birth and Death certificates• Prenatal records
– OB/GYN history, past pregnancies
• Hospital records– Antepartum– Delivery– Newborn/NICU– ED admissions
Sources of information for Maternal Health History
• Public Health Records– MSS/ISS (Maternal Infant Health Program: MIHP)– WIC– Family Planning– Other support services (CSHC, Healthy Start)
• Human Service Records (including Child Protective Service histories)
• Police reports (domestic violence, other stressors)
Risk Factors in Infant DeathsMaternal Characteristics
• Living in poverty
• Unmarried
• Low education level
• Unintended, unwanted pregnancy
• Less than adequate prenatal care
• Smoking during pregnancy
Risk Factors cont.
• Young maternal age (under 20)• First birth as teen• Victim of domestic violence• Substance abuse during pregnancy• Presence of life stresses
– homelessness– lack of transportation– mental illness– poor nutrition
Effective Reviews of Perinatal/Neonatal Deaths
• Get the right People to the table . . . • Gather enough data to give a clear picture
of maternal health history • Put findings into action to improve care
and resources for women, infants, and families
• Identify the risks, gaps in care and services
Snapshots of Michigan FIMR’s . . .
Translation of Findings into Action
Oakland County
• Started FIMR in 2000
• One of the highest disparity ratio’s for Black/White Infant Mortality in the state: Black Rate = 25.2, White Rate = 4.3 Ratio 5.9/1
• Team focused on reviewing deaths of all live born infants for residents of Pontiac and Southfield
FIMR in Oakland County, Michigan
• population 1,214,255
• GM & Chrysler are top 2 employers
• ranks 20th nationally in total disposable income
• City of Pontiac has 66,337 residents, 5% of the county total
• 48% of Pontiac residents are Black
OaklandCounty
FIMR Findings: Factors most frequently
contributing to Infant Mortality• Low Birth weight • Prematurity• Sexually transmitted & other infections• Frequent and closely spaced pregnancies• Previous fetal or infant loss, termination• Use of alcohol, tobacco, & other drugs• Through home interview, women did not
understand or recognize preterm labor signs
FIMR CAT Activities
• Partnered with Faith Based Organizations
• “Save our Babies, Save our Heritage”
• A public awareness campaign to reduce heath disparities and infant deaths in Oakland County
Material
– Church Bulletin Inserts– Posters – Presentations to
Parish Nurse Groups– Presentations to area
churches in Pontiac and Southfield
Save Our BabiesSave Our Heritage Brochure
Oakland County Infant Mortality Rates 1990 - 2005
16.5
23.3
19.718
0
5
10
15
20
25
Black Overall White
15.4
16.8
21
16.8
21.323.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
Black Overall White
Saginaw County
• Population 210,000• City: 70,000• 28% Of County
population is Minority• 58% of Saginaw City is
Minority• Urban
• Major Industries: – GM, Health Care,
Education, Agriculture
Saginaw
• 20% of infant deaths reviewed have documented abuse
• 31% of women report lifetime abuse
• 5% of pregnant women are beaten while pregnant
• Few prenatal care providers routinely asked women about abuse
Saginaw FIMR Findings: Domestic Violence and Pregnancy
Pregnancy and Abuse: Window of Opportunity
• May be the only time a woman routinely seeks health care
• Desire to protect baby
• Opportunity to think about the future
• Develops trust in provider
DV and Infant Loss
8.9
30.1
9.0
18.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Dea
ths
per
100
0 b
irth
s
Stillborn Infant Mortality
Non-Abused Abused
P<0.048
Domestic Violence and Pregnancy
• Developed Screening and Assessment Tool– 5 questions – Every woman, every visit
• Standard DV screening in all Prenatal Provider sites
Effects of DV Programs on Low Birth Weight Rate
1112
16.5
6.9
20.922.7
15
6.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
1996 1997 1998 1999
Per
cent
of B
irth
s
Non-Abused Abused County Average
Selected Risk Factors for 2004 FIMR
Cases Reviewed Maternal Risk Number Percent
First Pregnancy < 18 77 33.5
< 12th grade education 60 26.1
Unplanned pregnancy 91 39.6
Entry to care < 12
weeks 134 60.9
Entry to care > 12 weeks
52 22.6
Unknown ETC 44 19.1
Total 230 100
Plan First!
• Through this waiver, MDCH offers family planning services to women: – 19 through 44 years of age.– Who are not currently Medicaid eligible.– Who do not have full family planning benefits
through private insurance, including Medicare.– Who have family income at or below 185% of
the federal poverty level (FPL).
SIDS or Something Else?
• 12 - 15% of Infant Deaths in Michigan due to SIDS
• Through FIMR and CDR, multiple communities
began to identify that many of these deaths lacked
one of the three criteria for SIDS diagnosis:– Negative Autopsy– Negative Death Scene Investigation– Negative Medical Health Hx
Large numbers of deaths were actually related to un- safe
sleep environments . . .
Where Should Infant’s Sleep? A Comparison of Risk for Suffocation . . . Cribs vs. Adult Beds
Scheers, Rutherford, & Kemp, Pediatrics, 2003
0.63
25.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
RA
TE
OF
DE
AT
H
(per
100
,000
)
CRIB ADULT BED
PLACE INFANT WAS SLEEPING
Translation to Action: SIDS/Asphyxia
• Mandatory Death Scene Investigation
using State of Michigan Protocol
– State Police
– Medical Examiners
– Prosecutors
• Enhanced education /public awareness
on safe sleep environment
Michigan Legistation related to Safe Sleep and Suffocation:
• House bill 5225 – became Public Act 179 on July 1, 2004
• Mandates investigation by county medical examiner for cases of child death (under 2) under circumstances of sudden death, cause unknown.
• Promotes consistency and accuracy among county medical examiners in determining the cause of death
State Wide Prevention Efforts
• Multidisciplinary State level task force convened: MDCH’s Division of Family and Community Health
• Uniform message and recommendations issued for: – Child Care providers– Health care professionals– General public
State Wide Prevention Efforts
• On-line training for providers, clinics, MIHP staff MIHealth.org
• Developed web site through DHS
• http://michigan.gov/safesleep
Postneonatal Death Rate TrendsMichigan 1990 - 2007
02468
1012141618
SIDS ASSB Undetermined
There is much to be learned about the delivery of services even if the death was not
thought to be preventable.
National Fetal and Infant Mortality Review (NFIMR)
Since 1990, NFIMR has been a resource center working with states and communities to develop fetal and infant mortality review
programs.
For more information about FIMR, call (202) 863-2587, e-mail us at [email protected], or
visit us at http://www.acog.org/goto/nfimr.
The FIMR State Support Program is funded by the Michigan Department of Community Health, Administered by the Michigan Public Health Institute
Rosemary Fournier, RN, BSN State FIMR Program Coordinator
MDCH: Washington Square Building 109 W. Michigan
Lansing, MI 48913
Phone: (517) 335-8416 e-mail: [email protected]
