Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1© Simon Buckingham Shum
Hypermedia Discourse & Human-Agent Knowledge Cartography
Simon Buckingham Shum
Knowledge Media Institute & Computing Research CentreThe Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
www.kmi.open.ac.uk/people/[email protected]
NASA-Ontolog-KMWG OKMDS mini-seriesSession-06 - Thu 17-April-2008http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2008_04_17
2© Simon Buckingham Shum
Hypermedia
Discourse
3© Simon Buckingham Shum
Hypermedia!Modelling discourse relations
!Expressing di!erent perspectives on a conceptual space
!Supporting the incremental formalization of ideas
!Rendering structural visualizations
!Connecting heterogeneous content
4© Simon Buckingham Shum
Discourse!Verbal and written workplace communication
!Discourse communities: “making and taking perspectives”
!Dialogue
!Argumentation
!Claim making
!Analytical narrative
!Meetings
5© Simon Buckingham Shum
Notation(s)
IntuitiveUser Interface
ComputationalServices
Literacy/Fluency
DiscourseOntology
Hypermedia Discourse research
6© Simon Buckingham Shum
CompendiumCompendium
•• personal or grouppersonal or group
concept mappingconcept mapping
•• real time meetingreal time meeting
capturecapture
•• participatory modellingparticipatory modelling
•• discourse as semanticdiscourse as semantic
hypertexthypertext
7© Simon Buckingham Shum
Discourse grounded in Horst Rittel’s IBIS:Issue-Based Information System
8© Simon Buckingham Shum
Compendium: hypertext discoursemapping/conceptual modelling
9© Simon Buckingham Shum
Compendium: hypertext discoursemapping/conceptual modelling
10© Simon Buckingham Shum
Compendium: Descendent of gIBIS
11© Simon Buckingham Shum
Modelling using Issue-templates
12© Simon Buckingham Shum
Modelling organisational processes inCompendium using a Template
13© Simon Buckingham Shum
Completing a Compendium template
14© Simon Buckingham Shum
GeneratingCustomDocuments andDiagrams fromCompendiumTemplates
Build
Assignable
Inventory
Assignable
Inventory
Deviations/
Changes
(Engr Sched)
Approvals
Integrated/
Revised
Requirements
Field
Specific
Assignments
/Assignment
List
Installation
Details/
Specs/NDO
Assignable
Inventory
Notice (E1)
15© Simon Buckingham Shum
Structure management in Compendium
! Associative linkingnodes in a shared context connected by graphical Map links
! Categorical membershipnodes in di!erent contexts connected by common attributes via metadata Tags
! Hypertextual Transclusionreuse of the same node in di!erent views
! Templatesreuse of the same structure in di!erent views
! HTML, XML and RDF data exports for interoperability
! Java and SQL interfaces to add services
16© Simon Buckingham Shum
Using Compendium for personnelrecovery planning
Example of Conversational Modelling:real time dialogue mapping combined with model driven
templates (AI+IA)
Co-OPR Project (with Austin Tate):http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/project/co-opr
17© Simon Buckingham Shum
Mission Briefing: Intent template
Answers to template issuesprovided in the JTFC Briefing.Answers may be constrained
by predefined options, asspecified in the XML schema
18© Simon Buckingham Shum
Capturing political deliberation/rationale
Dialogue Mapcapturing the
planners’discussion of this
option
19© Simon Buckingham Shum
Planning Engine input to Compendium
Issues on which theI-X planning engineprovided candidateOptions
20© Simon Buckingham Shum
Modelling a document corpus:The Iraq Debate
http://kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/compendium/iraq
21© Simon Buckingham Shum
Annotating a document corpus:Chomsky’s article in the Iraq Debate
http://kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/compendium/iraq
22© Simon Buckingham Shum
Large scale NASA e-science field trials:
Interoperability with other databases, softwareagents and collaboration tools
www.kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/coakting/nasa
Clancey, W.J., Sierhuis, M., Alena, R., Berrios, D., Dowding, J., Graham, J.S., Tyree, K.S., Hirsh, R.L., Garry, W.B.,Semple, A., Buckingham Shum, S.J., Shadbolt, N. and Rupert, S. (2005). “Automating CapCom Using MobileAgents and Robotic Assistants.” 1st Space Exploration Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics andAstronautics, 31 Jan-1 Feb, 2005, Orlando, FL. Available from: AIAA Meeting Papers on Disc [CD-ROM]: Reston,VA, and as Advanced Knowledge Technologies ePrint 375: http://eprints.aktors.org/375
23© Simon Buckingham Shum Image Credits--- Mars: NASA/JPL/MSSS; Earth: NASA/JSC; Composite: MSSS
24© Simon Buckingham Shum
NASA e-science field trials (2004 and 2005)
Distributed Mars-Earth planning and data analysis toolsfor Mars Habitat field trial in Utah desert, supported from US+UK
www.kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/coakting/nasa
25© Simon Buckingham Shum
NASA Mobile Agents Architecture
26© Simon Buckingham Shum
Collaboration Configuration
Scientist(Mars)
Scientist(Earth)
Scientist(Earth)
Scientist(Mars)
Scientist(Earth)
Software AgentArchitecture
(Mars)
Compendium used as a collaboration medium at all intersections:humans+agents, reading+writing maps
RST-telecon-2005-04-11.i.avi00:49:08
27© Simon Buckingham Shum
NASA testbed:Compendium activity plans for surface exploration, constructed byscientists on ‘Earth’, interpreted by software agents on ‘Mars’
The Compendium nodes and relationships in this plan were interpreted by Brahms software agents for monitoring
and coordinating astronaut and robot activity during surface explorations.
Copyright, 2004,RIACS/NASA Ames, OpenUniversity, SouthamptonUniversityNot to be used withoutpermission
RST-telecon-2005-04-11.i.avi
1:11:57
28© Simon Buckingham Shum
CoAKTinG NASA testbed:Compendium science data map, generated by software agents, forinterpretation by Mars+Earth scientists
The Compendium maps were autonomously created and populated with science data by Brahms software agents that use models of the
mission plan, work process, data flow and science data relationships to create the maps.
Copyright, 2004,RIACS/NASA Ames, OpenUniversity, SouthamptonUniversityNot to be used withoutpermission
29© Simon Buckingham Shum
CoAKTinG NASA testbed:Compendium-based photo analysis by geologists on ‘Mars’
Copyright, 2004,RIACS/NASA Ames,Open University,SouthamptonUniversityNot to be usedwithout permission
30© Simon Buckingham Shum
NASA testbed:Compendium scientific feedback map from Earth scientists toMars colleagues
Copyright, 2004,RIACS/NASA Ames,Open University,SouthamptonUniversityNot to be usedwithout permission
31© Simon Buckingham Shum
Collaborative sensemaking in e-Science:Meeting Replay tool for Earth scientists, synchronisingvideo of Mars crew’s discussion as they annotate their mission plans
Copyright, 2004,RIACS/NASA Ames, OpenUniversity, SouthamptonUniversityNot to be used withoutpermission
NASA MR Clip: 00:50
32© Simon Buckingham Shum
Memetic Meeting ReplayThe CoAKTinG project’s results are now mainstreamed in the AccessGrid by the JISC Memetic VRE project
33© Simon Buckingham Shum
Memetic Meeting ReplayThe CoAKTinG project’s results are now mainstreamed in the AccessGrid by the JISC Memetic VRE project
34© Simon Buckingham Shum
In Gutenberg’s shadow(or standing on his shoulders)
Philosophical Transactions ofthe Royal Society of LondonMarch 1665
Le Journal des SçavansJanuary 1665
Newspapers + Invisible Colleges = Scholarly Journals[Information Technology] + [Social Networks] = Knowledge Medium
35© Simon Buckingham Shum
Jumping forward 343 years…
Buckingham Shum, S. (2007). Digital Research Discourse? Computational Thinking Seminar Series, School of Informatics,
University of Edinburgh, 25 Apr. 2007. http://kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/hyperdiscourse/docs/Simon-Edin-CompThink.pdf
36© Simon Buckingham Shum
…digital paper!
2008… Ideas and arguments(=knowledge claims) are now digital…
37© Simon Buckingham Shum
Paper: “The Scent of a Site: A System forAnalyzing and Predicting Information Scent,
Usage, and Usability of a Web Site”
“Web User Flow by
Information Scent
(WUFIS)”
Paper: “Informationforaging”
“Information
foraging
theory”
“Information scent
models”
“People try to maximise
their rate of gaining
information”
?
applies
Beyond document citations…
These annotations are freeform summariesof an idea, as one would find in researchers’
journals, fieldnotes, lit. review notes orblog entries
Addressable triple which can be contestede.g. supported/challenged
Method
Theory
Claim
Making formal connectionsbetween ideas creates a
semantic citation network —>novel literature navigation,querying and visualization
38© Simon Buckingham Shum
Combining formal relations with theexpressive freedom of ‘folksonomies’Relational classes and dialects (KMi Scholarly Ontologies project)
39© Simon Buckingham Shum
If we model concepts in a literature as conceptmaps… (KMi’s ClaiMapper, built on Compendium)
40© Simon Buckingham Shum
“Semantic del.icio.us”: KMi’s ClaimSpotter assigning and linking freeform tags
Sereno, B., Buckingham Shum, S. and Motta, E. (2007). Formalization, User Strategy and Interaction Design: Users’ Behaviour with Discourse TaggingSemantics. Workshop on Social and Collaborative Construction of Structured Knowledge, 16th Int. World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2007), Banff, 8-12
May 2007. http://www2007.org/workshops/paper_30.pdf
41© Simon Buckingham Shum
Visualising claims and arguments
claimfinder.open.ac.uk
When multipleanalysts annotate webdocuments via aserver, they cangenerate a sharedview of how they seethe field, and wherethey agree/disagree
42© Simon Buckingham Shum
“Semantic Google Scholar” KMi’s ClaimFinder
43© Simon Buckingham Shum
Lineage tree (the roots of a concept)
44© Simon Buckingham Shum
Adding Web 2.0 functionality to anopen platform for mapping conceptsand arguments
Cohere: http://cohereweb.net
<demo>
45© Simon Buckingham Shum
Cohere: creating a new Idea for Google’s“Knol”, linked to a website
46© Simon Buckingham Shum
Cohere: embedding an Idea in a blog
47© Simon Buckingham Shum
Cohere: raising issues about Google’s“Knol” Idea
48© Simon Buckingham Shum
Cohere: from tag clouds to idea webs
49© Simon Buckingham Shum
Cohere: all incoming and outgoing linksfrom a focal Idea
50© Simon Buckingham Shum
Cohere: extensible connectionlanguage doesn’t lock usersinto one ontology
51© Simon Buckingham Shum
Cohere: Argument from Expert Opinionwith Critical Questions
52© Simon Buckingham Shum
Cohere: semantically filtering a focal Ideaby “contrasting” connections
53© Simon Buckingham Shum
Cohere: a mashup visualization mergingdi!erent connections around a common Idea
54© Simon Buckingham Shum
Cohere: homepage integrates People,Ideas and Connections
55© Simon Buckingham Shum
Social Software vs Argumentation?
Social Software Argumentation Tools
social work
v. rapid highly reflective
v. low learning required
purpose
pace
entrythreshold
v. low semiformal / formalstructure
multimedia textualfocal
artifact
56© Simon Buckingham Shum
Acknowledgements
Funding gratefullyFunding gratefully
acknowledged:acknowledged:
Scholarly Scholarly Ontologies Ontologies Project:Project:
Victoria UrenVictoria Uren
Gangmin Gangmin LiLi
Clara ManciniClara Mancini
Neil BennNeil Benn
Bertrand Bertrand SerenoSereno
John John DomingueDomingue
Enrico MottaEnrico Motta
Compendium Project:Compendium Project:
Al Al Selvin Selvin ((Verizon/Open Verizon/Open U.)U.)
Maarten Maarten Sierhuis Sierhuis (NASA)(NASA)
Jeff Conklin (Jeff Conklin (CogNexus CogNexus Inst.)Inst.)
Michelle Michelle Bachler Bachler (Open U.)(Open U.)
57© Simon Buckingham Shum
Hypermedia Discourse project:community / theory / software / screencasts / case studies / user studies
www.kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/hyperdiscourse
Compendium Institute
www.CompendiumInstitute.org
Dialogue Mapping
www.cognexus.org
Visualizing Argumentation
www.VisualizingArgumentation.info
KnowledgeCartography