Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HYDROLOGY OF THE TERTIARY-CRETACEOUS AQUIFER SYSTEM IN THE VICINITY OF FORT RUCKER AVIATION CENTER, ALABAMA
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4118
Prepared in cooperation with the
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION CENTER.AND FORT RUCKER
Cover
Photograph courtesy of Fort Rucker Aviation Center.
HYDROLOGY OF THE TERTIARY-CRETACEOUS AQUIFER SYSTEM
IN THE VICINITY OF FORT RUCKER AVIATION CENTER, ALABAMA
By John C. Scott, Linda R. Law, and Riley H. Cobb
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4118
Prepared in cooperation with the
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION CENTER and
FORT RUCKER
Montgomery, Alabama
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Dallas L. Peck, Director
For additional information write to:
District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 520 19th Avenue Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35401
Copies of this report can be purchased from:
Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Box 25425, Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225
CONTENTS
Page
Abstract............................................................. 1Introduction......................................................... 3
Purpose and .scope............................................... 3Previous geologic and hydrologic studies........................ 5
Acknowledgments...................................................... 5Physical features.................................................... 10Geologic formations and their water-bearing characteristics.......... 10
Ripley Formation................................................ 10Providence Sand................................................. 13Clayton Formation............................................... 13Nanafalia Formation............................................. 14Tuscahoma Sand.................................................. 14Hatchetigbee Formation.......................................... 14Tallahatta Formation............................................ 15Lisbon Formation................................................ 15Residuum........................................................ 15Terrace and alluvial deposits................................... 16
Hydrology of the Tertiary-Cretaceous aquifer system.................. 16Source of ground water.......................................... 16Recharge and discharge.......................................... 17Aquifer tests................................................... 17Withdrawals..................................................... 23Fluctuation of the potentiometric surface....................... 25Effects of withdrawals on the aquifer system.................... 27
Quality of water..................................................... 29Summary.............................................................. 33Selected references.................................................. 34
III
ILLUSTRATIONS
Page
Figure 1. Map showing location of the area of study.................. 4
2. Map showing locations of wells and stratigraphic crosssections................................................. 6
3. Generalized geologic map of the Cretaceous and Tertiaryformations in southeastern Alabama....................... 8
4. Stratigraphic cross section A-A 1 from Enterprise toHeadland................................................. 11
5. Stratigraphic cross section B-B 1 from Cairns Airfieldnear Fort Rucker to about three miles north of Ozark..... 12
6. Generalized cross section of the aquifer system............ 18
7. Map showing locations of wells used in aquifer test atFort Rucker.............................................. 20
8. Fence diagram of production wells at Fort Rucker in 1983... 21
9. Drawdown in wells at Fort Rucker during aquifer test....... 22
10. Theoretical drawdown in the upper aquifer at Fort Rucker... 24
11. Fluctuation of the water level in well 24 (lower aquifer)/ average daily pumpage at Ozark/ and total monthly precipitation at Eufaula Wildlife Refuge during 1982-83.. 26
12. Water-level trends in production wells at Fort Ruckerfrom 1942 to 1983........................................ 28
13. Map showing the potentiometric surface of the upperaquifer in the study area in 1982....................... 30
14. Areas of diversion and recharge for the upper aquifer.... 32
TABLES
Table 1. Records of wells in the Fort Rucker area................... 36
2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area............... 75
3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area............ 106
IV
METRIC CONVERSION TABLE
The following factors may be used to convert the Inch-pound units published herein to International System of units (SI).
Multiply Inch-Pound units
inch (in.)foot (ft)mi le (mi )
Length
by
25.40.30481 .609
To obtain SI units
millimeter (mm) meter (m) kilometer (km)
Flow
gallon per minute (gal/min) million gallons per day
(Mgal/d)
foot squared per day
0.06308
0.04381
Transmissivity
0.09290
liter per second (L/s) cubic meters per second
(m 3/s)
meter squared per day (m 2/d)
National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929).A geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order
level nets of both the United States and Canada, formerly called mean sea level. This datum is referred to as sea level in this report.
HYDROLOGY OF THE TERTIARY-CRETACEOUS AQUIFER SYSTEM IN THE VICINITY OF THE FORT RUCKER AVIATION CENTER, ALABAMA
By John C. Scott/ Linda R. Law, and Riley H. Cobb
ABSTRACT
Fort Rucker Aviation Center in southeast Alabama is dependent on ground water for its water supply. The original well field at Fort Rucker/ con structed in 1941-42/ consisted of six multi-aquifer wells spaced about 2/000 feet apart. Uppermost screens in all of the wells are in the basal part of the Tuscahoma Sand about 150 to 200 feet below land surface. Forty years of pumpage from the wells resulted in declines in water levels. By 1976, some pumps were breaking suction and the demand for water was greater than the well field could supply. The study area consists of Dale County and parts of Coffee/ Geneva, Henry/ and Houston Counties.
The Tertiary-Cretaceous aquifer system in the study area consists of the basal part of the Tuscahoraa Sand/ the Nanafalia Formation, and the Clayton Formation of Tertiary age/ and the Providence Sand and Ripley Formation of Cretaceous age. For this report the system is divided into an upper and lower aquifer. The upper aquifer consists of the Tuscahoma Sand/ the Nanafalia and Clayton Formations/ and the upper part of the Providence Sand. The lower aquifer consists of the lower part of the Providence Sand and the Ripley Formation.
Water levels were measured in selected wells in June and July 1982 to prepare a potentiometric map of the upper aquifer. An aquifer test made at Fort Rucker during the study indicates that the upper aquifer has a transmissivity of about 7/800 ft^/day (feet squared per day) and a storage coefficient of 3 X 10"^. The aquifer test and a potentiometric map of the principal aquifer system indicate that the original wells at Fort Rucker are spaced too closely. New wells installed at Fort Rucker in 1981 and 1982 resulted in reduced pumpage from the old wells. The combination of reduced pumpage from the old wells and wider spacing between the new wells resulted in a temporary recovery of water levels in the area.
Field water-quality data were collected for most wells in the study area. Field determinations for pH/ specific conductance/ and temperature indicate that ground water is chemically suitable for most uses.
INTRODUCTION
Fort Rucker Aviation Center is in the southern part of Dale County in southeast Alabama. The study comprises an area of about 1/660 square miles that .includes all of Dale County and parts of Coffee/ Geneva/ Henry/ and Houston Counties (see fig. 1). Principal cities in the study area are Dothan/ Ozark/ and Enterprise. The Fort Rucker military reservation comprises an area of about 90 square miles within the study area.
The original Fort Rucker well field was installed in 1941-42. Six wells were drilled about 2/000 feet apart in a cluster. The wells are multiaquifer/ and screens were installed in all of the wells in the basal part of the Tuscahoma Sand 150 to 200 feet below land surface. As a consequence of development of the shallow aquifer and the cone of depression that resulted from 40 years of pumpage/ the pumps began breaking suction in the 1960's and serious water shortages began to occur by the summer of 1976. Attempts were made to reconstruct the wells by removing the shallow well screens/ but the reconstruction was essentially unsuccessful. In 1981/ facilities engineers at Fort Rucker Aviation Center requested the U.S. Geological Survey to make a hydrologic and geologic study that would assist them in locating and designing a new well field to alleviate immediate and future water-supply problems at the center.
Purpose and Scope
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hydrogeology of the Tertiary-Cretaceous aquifer system in the Fort Rucker area. The study was designed to identify hydrologic problems in the area that would aid facilities engineers in locating and designing a new well field for Fort Rucker.
Field work included inventory of all military/ public water-supply/ industrial/ and irrigation wells in the study area and selected domestic wells where additional information was needed (see fig. 2). Water levels were measured where possible/ and field determinations for pH/ specific conduc tance/ and water temperature were made at most sites. Water levels were measured in selected wells in the study area in June and July 1982. These data were used to prepare a potentiometric map of the upper aquifer. Drill cuttings/ driller's logs/ and geophysical logs were collected from four test wells at Fort Rucker and from other wells and test wells drilled in the area during the study. Drill cuttings were described by either the Geological Survey of Alabama or the U.S. Geological Survey. An aquifer test was con ducted at Fort Rucker in March 1983 to estimate the hydraulic characteristics of the aquifer/ and the magnitude of mutual interference of water levels between wells.
-34"
-33°
-52°
-31°
88'
I
87°86 85°
I
54-
55-
32 ~
31 -
Figure 1. Location of the area of study.
4
Previous Geologic and Hydrologic Studies
The first published geologic map that included the study area was probably Michael Tourney's geologic map of Alabama. The map was included in his second Biennial Report of the Alabama State Geologist in 1858. More detailed geologic maps of the State were prepared later by Smith and others (1894) and Adams and others (1926). A map of the Tertiary formations in Alabama was prepared by MacNeil (1946). Geologic maps of Coffee/ Dale, Geneva, Henry, and Houston Counties were compiled in the 1960's by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Geological Survey of Alabama. The geologic map in this report (fig. 3) is modified from the map by MacNeil (1946). MacNeil's map is not as detailed as the county geologic maps, but the detail presented is adequate for this report.
Ground-water data for the study area were published as early as 1907 in Eugene Alien Smith's "Underground Water Resources of Alabama" (Smith, 1907). More recent data are included in LaMoreaux (1948) and Carter and others (1949). Water-availability studies were made in the 1960's by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Geological Survey of Alabama. Results of these studies were published in county water-availability reports by the Geological Survey of Alabama.
ACKNOWL EDGMENTS
The authors thank Facilities Engineering personnel at Fort Rucker, and waterworks officials at Dothan, Ozark, Enterprise, and several other cities and towns in the study area. Particular acknowledgment is due Col. Dan Barney, Director of Facilities Engineering at Fort Rucker, Mr. Joseph Hayes, Mr. Robert Flemming, and Mr. John Ard of Fort Rucker for their assistance in the collection of hydrologic data. Acknowledgment is also made to Layne-Central Company, Pensacola, Florida and Donald Smith of Smith Well and Supply Company, Headland, Alabama for furnishing data for wells in the study area.
tfoooo
'- FORT RUCKER
81) '~?MILITARY RESERVATION
T.2N.
R.21E. R.22E.Base modified from U.S. Geological Survey, Dothan, Ale- bama; Georgie; Florida; 1:250,000 quadrangle, limited re vision 1965.
Figure 2. Locations of wells and stratigraphic cross sections.
6
84*15*00'
EXPLANATION
^ Well yielding more than 100 ^ gallons per minute
Q Well yielding less than 100 gallons per minute
X Observation well
-(J>- Oil test well
A A' Stratigraphic cross section
Note: Well numbers corres pond to those given in Table 1.
SCALE.MILES
R.28E.
Base map modified from U.S. Geologi cal Survey map of Alabama 1:500,000
10
Figure 3. Generalized geologic map of the Cretaceous and Tertiary formations in southeastern Alabama.
8
UJ
EXPLANATION
RESIDUUM
OCALA LIMESTONE AND MOODYS BRANCH FORMATION
DC
< OCALA LIMESTONE
LISBON AND TALLAHATTA FORMATIONS
UJ
HATCHETIGBEE FORMATION AND TUSCAHOMA SAND
NANAFALIA FORMATION
Tc CLAYTON FORMATION
PROVIDENCE SAND AND RIPLEY FORMATION
PHYSICAL FEATURES
The study area is in the Southern Red Hills and Dougherty Plain districts of the East Gulf Coastal Physiographic section (Sapp and Emplaincourt/ 1975). The Southern Red Hills are characterized by sand hills dissected by southward- flowing streams. The Dougherty Plain is a relatively flat upland that slopes gently southward except where dissected by streams.
Most of the study area is drained by the Choctawhatchee River and its tributaries. The northwestern corner of the area is drained by the Pea River and its tributaries, and the eastern edge of the area is dral led by tribu taries to the Chattahoochee and Chipola Rivers.
The average annual rainfall in the study area is about 54 inches. The wettest months usually are March and July; the driest usually are October and November.
GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS AND THEIR WATER-BEARING CHARACTERISTICS
The study area is underlain by sedimentary deposits of Cretaceous and Tertiary age (fig. 3). These deposits strike generally eastward and dip southward 15 to 25 feet per mile. Geologic formations that comprise the Tertiary-Cretaceous aquifer system are from oldest to youngest, the Ripley Formation and Providence Sand of Cretaceous age and the Clayton and Nanafalia Formations and Tuscahoma Sand of Tertiary age (figs. 4 and 5). The Hatchetigbee, Tallahatta, and Lisbon Formations overlie the Tuscahoma Sand, but are not important aquifers in the study area.
Ripley Formation
The Ripley Formation is the deepest geologic unit tapped for water supplies in the Fort Rucker area. The Ripley crops out north of the study area in Barbour and Bullock Counties and in the northern part of Pike County. The formation is about 350 to 400 feet thick immediately south of the outcrop and may be more than 500 feet thick in the study area. The Ripley consists of sand and calcareous clay interbedded with calcareous sandstone and sandy limestone. The upper 150 feet of the unit consists mainly of sand and sandy limestone; the lower part consists mainly of calcareous clay and calcareous sandstone. In the outcrop area, the Ripley is subdivided into the Cusseta Sand Member and an upper unnamed member. Analysis of drill cuttings and geophysical logs of test wells at Fort Rucker indicates that subdivision of the formation in the study area is impractical. Sample logs of drill cuttings collected from several wells in the study area are given in table 2. Driller's logs of selected wells are given in table 3. These logs give detailed lithologic descriptions of the Ripley and overlying geologic formations.
10
TOft
O 01 W
0) (D O ft H- O 3
I
ft (D
H- 0) (D
ft 0
(D
g.
133d m aoruony
Zl
ALTITUDE IN FEET
cn
COrt H&H-
yH- O
ogCO 0)
rt CDO (D
o rtH-
*ICO I&" H (-h(D ! <CO O
g n M (Urt H-
O COfh .
ot N HS PI ^ (D
(D
RO rt
CO
IV)
8
o
>^|l*< -M
ia
51
O <D.
ON
2. <o01
ALTITUDE IN FEET
The upper part of the Ripley formation is developed for water supplies at Fort Rucker and the cities of Ozark and Dothan. The Ripley Formation is usually developed in conjunction with the overlying Providence Sand. However, municipal wells at Ozark are apparently screened solely in the Ripley. Ozark well 4 (well 22) had a drawdown of 89 feet after pumping 750 gal/min (gallons per minute) for 24 hours in 1968.
Providence Sand
The Providence Sand, the uppermost Cretaceous formation, overlies the Ripley Formation and crops out in Harbour, Bullock, and Pike Counties. The Providence, in the area of outcrop, consists of the Perote Member at the bottom and an unnamed member at the top. The Perote Member consists mainly of clay, and the unnamed upper member consists mainly of sand. These lithologies are present in the subsurface in the Fort Rucker area. Sand in the upper member, however, is interbedded with sandy limestone and calcareous sandstone, and the lower part of the Perote Member is mainly sand. The Providence is about 150 to 220 feet thick in the outcrop area and in the subsurface in the Fort Rucker area.
The Providence is a major source of water supply at Fort Rucker, Enter prise, Dothan, and at several smaller towns and communities in the study area. The Providence is generally developed in conjunction with the underlying Ripley Formation or with the overlying Clayton and Nanfalia Formations and the Tuscahoma Sand. A municipal well at Dothan (well 91), apparently screened solely in the Providence, had a drawdown of 36 feet after pumping 876 gal/min for 48 hours in 1974.
Clayton Formation
The Clayton Formation, the lowermost Tertiary formation in the study area, overlies the Providence Sand and crops out in southern Bullock County and in Barbour and Pike Counties. At outcrops, the Clayton consists of a basal sand that is overlain by relatively pure limestone. This limestone is overlain by sandy limestone and sandy clay that comprise the upper part of the formation. The maximum thickness of the Clayton in Barbour County is about 125 feet (Newton, 1965) and in Pike County is about 180 feet (Shamberger, 1968). Analysis of drill cuttings from test wells at Fort Rucker indicates that the thickness of the Clayton in the study area is about 150 to 175 feet. The lithologic character of the formation in the subsurface is similar to that at outcrops except that most outcrops are deeply weathered and much of the limestone is absent due to solution.
The Clayton is a major aquifer in some parts of southeast Alabama, and is developed in some of the original wells at Fort Rucker. However, tests made in the Clayton during the 1981-82 test drilling program at Fort Rucker indi cate that the limestone in the Clayton is not very permeable in the vicinity of Fort Rucker. The low permeability probably results from the limited extent of solution channel development compared to the more extensive channel- development in the Clayton in other parts of the study area. A capacity test for a well developed in the Clayton at Battens Crossroads indicates that the well had a drawdown of 15 feet after pumping 112 gal/min for 24 hours in 1968.
13
Nanafalia Formation
The Nanafalia Formation overlies the Clayton Formation in the study area, and crops out in southern Harbour and Pike Counties, and in northern Coffee, Dale, and Henry Counties. The Nanafalia consists of siltstone, calcareous clay, and sand in the area of its outcrop. In the subsurface in the Fort Rucker area, the unit consists of glauconitic fossiliferous sand, calcareous carbonaceous clay, and sandy limestone. The Nanafalia is about 100 to 160 feet thick in the study area.
Sand beds in the Nanafalia Formation are a major source of water in the study area. The Nanafalia is usually developed in conjunction with the over lying Tuscahoma Sand and the underlying Clayton Formation and Providence Sand. The original wells at Fort Rucker are screened in the Nanafalia, but are also screened in the Tuscahoma, Clayton, and Providence. A capacity test made for a well at Newville, apparently screened solely in the Nanafalia, indicates that the well had a drawdown of 86 feet after pumping 210 gal/min for 24 hours in 1974.
Tuscahoma Sand
The Tuscahoma Sand overlies the Nanafalia Formation and crops out over a large part of the study area (fig. 3). The basal part of the Tuscahoma con sists primarily of glauconitic sand which is 25 to 50 feet thick in the Fort Rucker area. The upper part consists of 80 to 120 feet of calcareous carbon aceous clay. Geohydrologic data indicate that both parts of the Tuscahoma thicken toward the west.
The Tuscahoma is developed for water supplies in conjunction with under lying formations at Fort Rucker, Enterprise, Dothan, and several other towns and communities in the study area. Large capacity wells (wells producing 100 gal/min or more) are rarely developed exclusively in the Tuscahoma. Records of a few wells that are developed exclusively in the Tuscahoma indicate that wells in the Tuscahoma area generally have specific capacities ranging from 1 to 2 (gal/min)/ft (gallons per minute per foot of drawdown).
Hatchetigbee Formation
The Hatchetigbee Formation overlies the Tuscahoma Sand and crops out in Coffee, Dale, and Henry Counties. The Hatchetigbee is included with the underlying Tuscahoma Sand on MacNeil's geologic map (fig. 3). The Hatchet- tigbee consists of a basal glauconitic sand bed that is 4 to 10 feet thick at outcrops, and upper beds that consist mainly of carbonaceous clay. The upper part of the unit generally ranges in thickness from 20 feet in Henry County to 50 feet in Coffee County. Test well records indicate that the Hatchetigbee is about 50 feet thick at Fort Rucker.
The Hatchetigbee is not a major aquifer in the study area, and is generally not tapped by large capacity wells. Some domestic wells in the study area are developed in the basal sand bed of the Hatchetigbee.
14
Tallahatta Formation
The Tallahatta Formation overlies the Hatchetigbee Formation and crops out in Coffee, Dale, and Henry Counties. The Tallahatta varies in thickness and lithology throughout the study area. The unit is only about 20 feet thick in northern Coffee County, but is more than 100 feet thick in the southern part of the study area. The Tallahatta consists of silty clay, calcareous sandstone, and fossiliferous silty sand. At some outcrops in Dale and Henry Counties, the Tallahatta contains beds of massive siltstone which are typical of the formation in southwest Alabama. The Tallahatta is included with the overlying Lisbon Formation on MacNeil's geologic map.
The Tallahatta Formation is not a major aquifer in the study area, although it was a principal source of water for Dothan in the early years of Dothan's public water system. Dothan presently (1983) uses one well (well 109) developed in the Tallahatta and the overlying Lisbon Formation. A capa city test made for this well in 1955 indicated a drawdown of 53 feet after pumping 584 gal/min for 8 hours. The Tallahatta is a principal source of water for several towns and communities south of the study area.
Lisbon Formation
The Lisbon Formation overlies the Tallahatta Formation and crops out on uplands over much of the study area. The Lisbon generally ranges in thickness from 20 feet in northern Henry County to 150 feet along the southern part of the study area. The Lisbon consists of sand, sandy limestone, and calcareous sandy clay in the subsurface. At outcrops, the Lisbon is generally weathered to massive silty sand.
The Lisbon Formation is not a major aquifer in the study area, mainly because of its proximity to the land surface. The Lisbon is a principal source of water supply south of the study area, especially in southern Houston County where it is developed in conjunction with the overlying Ocala Limestone for irrigation and public water supplies. The Lisbon is developed in some parts of the study area for domestic and stock supplies.
Residuum
The uppermost Tertiary formations in the study area consist of residual clay, sand, gravel, and chert boulders that are the residual remains of the Moodys Branch Formation and the Ocala Limestone of Eocene age and Miocene and (or) Pliocene deposits. These deposits, which have been jumbled due to the solution of the limestone, are collectively named residuum. The residuum is generally less than 25 feet thick at Fort Rucker, but may be as much as 100 feet thick in the Dothan area.
Because of the jumbled heterogeneous characteristics of the residuum, it is not a significant source of water in the study area. Domestic and stock wells in some parts of the area are developed in the residuum. In southern parts of Houston and Geneva Counties, where the Ocala Limestone has not been
15
completely dissolved, it is a major aquifer for municipal/ irrigation, and other farm-related uses. Some wells in this area are developed solely in the Ocala; others are developed in the Ocala and the underlying Lisbon Formation. The Ocala Limestone and the Moodys Branch Formation undifferentiated crop out along the southern margin of the study area.
Terrace and Alluvial Deposits
Terrace and alluvial deposits of Quaternary age are present along and adjacent to the flood plains of major streams in the study area. These deposits consist of sand, silt, clay, and small gravel, and are usually not more than 25 feet thick. These deposits, which are not shown on MacNeil's geologic map, are most extensive in the valleys of the Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers.
The terrace and alluvial deposits are not a major source of water in the study area. A few domestic wells are developed in the deposits.
HYDROLOGY OF THE TERTIARY-CRETACEOUS AQUIFER SYSTEM
The Tertiary-Cretaceous aquifer system in the study area consists of water-bearing units in several geologic formations. Geologic formations comprising the aquifer system are the basal part of the Tuscahoma Sand and the Nanafalia and Clayton Formations of Tertiary age, and the Providence and Ripley Formation of Cretaceous age (see fig. 6). A clay zone in the upper part of the Tuscahoma Sand is the upper confining layer for the aquifer system and massive clay beds in the lower part of the Ripley Formation comprise the lower confining layer. Geologic and hydrologic data compiled during the study indicate that a clay zone in the Providence Sand is a third confining layer that divides (to some extent) the aquifer system into an upper and lower aquifer. Therefore, for this stsudy, the Tertiary-Cretaceous aquifer system is divided into an upper aquifer consisting of the Tuscahoma Sand, the Nanafalia and Clayton Formations, and the upper part of the Providence Sand, and a lower aquifer consisting of the lower part of the Providence Sand and the upper part of the Ripley Formation. Fort Rucker, Dothan, and Enterprise pump water mainly from the upper aquifer; Ozark pumps water from the lower aquifer.
Source of Ground Water
All ground water in the study area is derived from rainfall that occurs on or north of the area. Most of the rainfall leaves the area as runoff through streams or as evapotranspiration. Some of the rainfall infiltrates downward to recharge the aquifers that underlie the study area.
16
Recharge and Discharge
The amount of recharge received by the aquifers is difficult to estimate because it is dependent on when the rainfall occurs, the intensity and magni tude of the rainfall, and atmospheric and hydrologic conditions such as air temperature and soil-moisture conditions. For example, a 2-inch rainstorm in July will usually run off or remain in the soil zone, later to be evaporated or transpired back to the atmosphere. A 2-inch rain in December will usually result in significant recharge because the evapotranspiration rate is low and because winter rains generally are less intense and of longer duration than summer rainstorms.
The area of recharge for the Tertiary-Cretaceous aquifer system is 20 to 50 miles updip (north) of pumping centers in the study area (see fig. 6). The recharge area for the upper aquifer is 20 to 40 miles updip from the pumping centers; the recharge area for the lower aquifer is 40 to 50 miles updip.
Water moves downdip through the aquifer system to points of downdip- discharge. The principal areas of downdip-discharge are at major pumping centers in the study area. Major centers that pump from the upper aquifer are Fort Rucker, Dothan, and Enterprise. Ozark is the major center that pumps from the lower aquifer.
A large part of the recharge in the outcrop area is lost as discharge to perennial (ground-water supported) streams. A major control on the amount of recharge received by the aquifer is the transmissivity of the aquifer downdip. The downdip-transmissivity limits the amount of water that can move through the aquifer from the area of outcrop. A transmissivity of 7,800 ft2/d and a hydraulic gradient of 10 ft/mi will permit about 0.6 Mgal/d per lineal mile of outcrop area to move through the upper aquifer. Expressed another way, this is about 1.4 inches of recharge per square mile of outcrop.
Aquifer Test
An aquifer test was conducted at Fort Rucker during the week of March 14-18, 1983. The purposes of the test were to obtain data from which estima tes of hydraulic characteristics (transmissivity and storage) of the upper aquifer could be made and to determine the magnitude of pumping-level inter ference between wells. Well 70 (Fort Rucker well 9) was used as the pumping well during the 24-hour test, and drawdown measurements were made in wells 65, 66, 69, 71, and 79 (Fort Rucker wells 1, 2, 4, 6, and 10) which were not pumping during the test period (figs. 7 and 8). Wells 47 and 72 (Fort Rucker wells 7 and 8) were pumping at a constant rate into the Fort Rucker water system prior to and during the test period. Wells 67 and 68 (Fort Rucker wells 3 and 5) were not pumping, but were not used for the aquifer test.
Data obtained during the test indicate that the Tuscahoma Sand, the Nanafalia and Clayton Formations, and the upper part of the Providence Sand are hydraulically interconnected at Fort Rucker, and can be considered to be a single aquifer (upper aquifer) from a hydrologic viewpoint. Figure 9 is a semi-logrithmic plot of drawdown versus the radius (distance) from the pumping
17
NORTH
Recharge Area Lower Aquifer
Recharge Area Upper Aquifer
600 r-
400
200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Sea level
T.14N.I Tt3N. T.12N. T.11N. T.1QN.
Miles
T.9N.
Figure 6. Generalized cross section of the aquifer system.
18
Study Area
3
SOUTH
Lisbon > Formation
ITallahatta and H .1 Hatchetigbee Fms.
lluscahoma Sea tevell I Sand 'j Nanafalia | Formation
Clayton Formation
Providence Sand
Ripley Formation
200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
19
R.23 E. R.24 E.31*22
31'20'(X -
Base modified from U.S. Geological Survey, Daleville, Alabama. 1:24,000, 1960, Photorevised 1980. SCALE
0 IMile
EXPLANATION
72 Number shown in Figure 2 8 Fort Pucker well number
Figure 7. Locations of wells used in aquifer test at Fort Rucker,
20
72
2 Mites
Figure 8. Fence diagram of production wells at Fort Rucker in 1983,
21
RADIUS, IN FEET 1000 10,000
Figure 9. Drawdown in wells at Fort Rucker during aquifer test.
22
well after 24 hours of pumping. The transmissivity is determined by the slope of the line drawn through the points in the following equation:
-2.30QT 2 s/ Iog10 r
where T = transmissiyity, in feet squared per day,Q = discharge of the well, in cubic feet per day,s = drawdown, in feet,
and r = radius, in feet from pumping well.
Computations of data collected during the test indicate that the upper aquifer has a transmissivity of about 7,800 ft^/d and a coefficient of storage of about 3x10~4. These values are in the normal range for an artesian aquifer consisting of unconsolidated sediments.
The drawdown data indicate that the interference of pumping levels between the new wells is relatively small, and that interference between well 70 (Fort Rucker well 9) and the old wells is sufficiently small to allow pumping from well 70 and one or more of the old wells without serious mutual interference. Figure 10 is a suite of curves that depicts, in a general way, the theoretical drawdown at various distances from a well that is discharging constantly from the upper aquifer at a rate of 700 gal/min (Knowles and others, 1963). The curves, which show drawdowns after 1, 5, 10, and 20 years of continuous pumping, may be used to aid in estimating optimum spacing of future wells at Fort Rucker. For example, a well discharging at a rate of 700 gal/min 5,000 feet from an idle well would cause a drawdown of 14.5 feet in the idle well after 20 years of continuous pumping. The curves may also be used to estimate the mutual interference between existing wells. The data plots for the curves were computed from the aquifer characteristics obtained from the aquifer test at Fort Rucker.
Capacity tests made by Fort Rucker personnel in 1975 indicate that the well field was capable of producing from 3.0 to 3.5 Mgal/d at that time (oral commun., Mr. John Ard, Fort Rucker Waterworks Manager, 1982). Well 47 was placed in production in 1977 and wells 70, 72, and 79 were placed in pro duction in 1982-83. Pumpage from these wells combined with selected pumpage from the original wells will produce 5 to 6 Mgal/d. An additional well, to be completed in 1984, will increase the capacity of the well field by about 0.8 Mgal/d.
Withdrawals
Pumpage from the aquifer system for public water supplies has increased by as much as a factor of 10 during the past 40 years. Reported daily water use at Dothan was about 1.4 million gallons in 1946 (Carter and others, 1949). Maximum daily use is presently (1983) about 14.8 million gallons. Pumpage at Ozark, which was about 0.25 Mgal/d in 1946, is presently 2.75 Mgal/d. Pumpage at Enterprise has increased from 0.4 Mgal/d in 1946 to 5.3 Mgal/d in 1983. Historical pumpage records for Fort Rucker are not available. However, water level records compiled for the original wells at Fort Rucker indicate an
23
10
UJ in § £
o
15 20 25
4T
Ts=
QW
(u)
4T
TT
Whe
re r
- di
stan
ce f
rom
pum
ped
we
11 in
feet
.S=
2.6
x 1
0~4
Tr7
,800
ft.2/
day
t=
tim
e si
nce
pum
ping
be
gan
in d
ays
W(u
)- w
ell
func
tion
Q -
700
gpm
30.
I 10I 12
I 14I 16
1820
DIS
TA
NC
E
FRO
M P
UM
PE
D W
EL
L,I
N
TH
OU
SA
ND
S O
F F
EE
T
Fig
ure
1
0. T
heo
reti
cal
draw
dow
n in
th
e
up
per
aq
uif
er
at
Fo
rt
Ruc
ker.
accelerated rate of decline from 1976 to 1982. Waterworks officials report that the demand exceeded the capacity of the wells during summer months from 1976 to 1982 (oral commun. , Mr. John Ard, Fort Rucker Waterworks Manager, 1982).
Ground-water withdrawals for irrigation use increased significantly during the past 40 years. Pumping from ground-water sources for irrigation was practically nonexistent in the 1940's f but is presently common in some parts of the study area. The amount of water used for irrigation is difficult to estimate because irrigation is seasonal and sporadic due to climatic conditions and crop requirements. However, based on available data for irrigation wells in the study area, 10 Mgal/d or more of ground water is used for irrigation some of the time during the growing season. Use of ground water for irrigation will probably accelerate more in the next 40 years as farmers attempt to maximize production to compensate for increasing costs of fuel, fertilizer, and farm machinery.
The current total use of ground water for industry is estimated to be about 5 Mgal/d. Industrial use of ground water has not increased as signifi cantly as use for irrigation and public supplies, because the economy is based on agriculture. Industrial ground-water use will probably increase during the next 40 years and may increase significantly if industry continues to expand in the area as it has during the past 15 years.
Fluctuations of the Potentiometric Surface
In a confined artesian aquifer system such as the one underlying the study area, the level to which water will rise in wells developed in the aquifer is called the potentiometric surface. The potentiometric surface fluctuates in response to seasonal variations in recharge and discharge. In areas of heavy pumpage, such as Fort Rucker, Ozark, and Dothan, fluctuations of the potentiometric surface also reflect the variations in rates of with drawals.
A water-level recorder was installed on an unused municipal well (well 24) at Ozark in 1982 to monitor fluctuations of the potentiometric surface in the lower aquifer (Ripley Formation). Figure 11 shows fluctuations of the water surface in the well from February 1982 through March 1983. The figure also shows average daily pumpage per month by the city of Ozark and total monthly precipitation at Eufaula Wildlife Refuge (about 50 miles northeast of Fort Rucker in the outcrop area of the lower aquifer). Comparison of the three graphs in figure 11 indicates that the potentiometric surface of the lower aquifer at Ozark is affected more by pumpage from the aquifer than by recharge. However, recharge apparently had some effect on the potentiometric surface during the winter of 1982-83 because the water surface was higher in February 1983 than in February 1982. Rainfall records of the National Weather Service indicate that precipitation was generally below normal during the winter of 1981-82, and was generally above normal during the winter of 1982-83.
25
1983
&
fSfc o >»3 = CO Q-'F ~0
^c o>CO == 0. ° £ coCD C C O> O .O2 E-co0 i_ O)> CD H- < Q. O
296
§ 298
fCO o
_§ 300
oCD ^
1 302
0. CD O 304
306 L
^o 101-
a o<-EXPLANATION
Water level measurement or recorded water level
Continuous graphic record
- Missing Record
Figure 11. Fluctuation of the water level in well 24 (lower aquifer), average daily pumpage at Ozark, and total monthly precipi tation at Eufaula Wildlife Refuge during 1982-83.
26
Historical water-level data were recorded for the study area as early as 1895 (Smith, 1906). Smith published water-level data that were obtained bet ween 1895 and 1905. Additional water-level data were published in the 1940's (LaMoreaux, 1948) and in the 1960's in the county water-availability reports. These data and data collected during the current study indicate that the most significant declines in the potentiometric surface occurred after 1965.
Waterworks personnel at Fort Rucker have measured water levels in the original Fort Rucker wells periodically since the wells were constructed. These data/ shown graphically in figure 12, indicate that the largest water- level declines at Fort Rucker occurred between 1976 and 1982. This accele rated decline resulted from increased water use at Fort Rucker (oral commun., Mr. John Ard/ Fort Rucker Waterworks Manager, 1982). Mr. Ard reported that during summer months from 1977 to 1981 the demand for water exceeded the capacity of the well field and the use of water at Fort Rucker had to be restricted.
A potentiometric map of the upper aquifer in the study area is shown in figure 13. The map is compiled mainly from water-level measurements made in June and July 1982. Depressions in the potentiometric surface have developed in the Dothan area, the Battens Crossroads area, and the Fort Rucker- Enterprise area. These depressions result from long-term withdrawals of large amounts of water. Before wells 70, 72, and 79 (Fort Rucker wells 9, 8, and 10) were installed, a depression had formed in the vicinity of Fort Rucker's well field. After these wells were placed in service in 1981-82, the original wells were idle most of the time and the water surface recovered about 20 feet. This recovery resulted from pumping the new wells which are 5,000 feet or more apart as opposed to the previous pumpage from the original wells which are about 2,000 feet apart. The recovery of the water level is temporary, and a depression will probably develop around the new wells in future years. The system can withstand a deeper cone of depression than the one that developed around the original well field because the pumps are set deeper in the new wells.
Effects of Withdrawals on the Aquifer System
Prior to development by wells, aquifers are in a steady state because, over a long period of time, recharge is equal to discharge (Lonman, 1972). Discharge from wells upsets this balance by causing a loss from storage. The imbalance remains until there is no further loss from storage. The loss from storage can be counterbalanced only by an increase in recharge, a decrease in natural discharge, or a combination of the two, as long as pumpage continues.
Available hydrologic data indicate that water levels in the pumping centers are continuing to decline. No significant decrease in streamflow or decline in water levels is apparent in the recharge area and, according to records of the National Weather Service, rainfall during the past 20 years was about normal. Based on these data the aquifer system has not reached a new state of equilibrium subsequent to withdrawals from the pumping centers.
27
20
0
180
to CD
160
ID HI u_ z g
140
t
<
120
100
80 19
40
EX
PLA
NA
TIO
N
Fort
Puc
ker
wel
l nu
mbe
r W
ell
num
ber
show
n in
Fig
ure
2
3
65
66 67
69
68
71
1950
1960
1970
1980
1985
Figu
re 12. Water-level \-
jren
cu, ^ ̂reduction wells at Fort Rucker from 19
42 to 19
83,
The depression around the pumping centers will continue to increase in size until drawdowns from pumpage lower water levels sufficiently to increase the amount of water entering the aquifers to offset the pumpage. Through the use of the potentiometric map, a rough estimation of the rate of increase needed to attain a new equilibrium can be made. Flow paths for ground-water movement can be drawn on the potentiometric surface to determine the area from which pumpage in the study area obtains its water (fig. 14). The intersection of the area of diversion with the outcrop-area of the aquifer determines the contributing area (recharge area) for the pumpage. An estimate of the addi tional recharge needed to attain equilibrium can be made by dividing the pumpage (expressed in acre-inches per year) by the area of recharge (in acres). Pumpage is 33 Mgal/d (443,577 acre-inches per year) for the area of diversion and the recharge area equals about 400 mi2 (256,000 acres). The resultant rate is about 1.75 in/yr that must be supplied to attain a new equilibrium. This rate appears to be a reasonable value, but available data are inadequate to ascertain if the transmissivity of the aquifer is suf ficiently high to support the gradient of the potentiometric surface to induce that amount of recharge. Based on the single transmissitivity value for the aquifer, natural recharge would be about 1.4 in/yr under the present ground- water gradient. A steeper gradient induced by pumpage would increase the rate of water-movement through the aquifer and enable a greater amount of water to be recharged. To reach a new state of equilibrium, the additional water would have to be captured from the sources of discharge in the recharge area, evapo- transpiration and streamflow, or from a reduction in withdrawals in the pumping centers. Reduction of evapotranspiration would not cause any adverse effects but reduction of streamflow could cause problems during dry periods. Reduction in pumpage is not expected to occur in the foreseeable future.
QUALITY OF WATER
Field determinations for specific conductance, pH, and temperature were made for most wells inventoried during the current study. No laboratory che mical analyses were made.
The specific conductance of water from wells sampled ranges from 220 to 540 micromhos per centimeter at 25°Celsius. The pH ranges from 6.1 to 8.1 units and has a median of about 7.2 units. The temperature ranges from 19°C (Celsius) or 66°F (Fahrenheit) to 26.5°C or 80°F. More detailed water- quality data are published in the water-availability reports for Coffee, Dale, Geneva, Henry, and Houston Counties. Additional water-quality data are available in the files of the U.S. Geological Survey and the Alabama Department of Environmental Management, Water Division.
29
sefoooo
T.7N
31°30 Od - -s*
T.6N
T.2N
R.21E. R.22E.Base modified from U.S. Geological Survey, Oothan, Ala bama; Georgia; Florida; 1:250,000 quadrangla, limited re vision 1965.
Figure 13. Potentiometric surface of the upper aquifer in the study area in 1982.
30
8^1500"
EXPLANATION
Potentiometric contour shows altitude of the potentiometric surface for the upper aquifer in the Fort Rucker area. Dashed where approximately located. Contour interval 20 feet.
Hachures indicate depressions. Datum is sea level.
Well in which water level was mea sured in 1982.
SCALE[MILES
31
(-3?
8'5°
EXPLANATION
Potentiometric Contour' - shows eleva tion at which water would have stood in tightly cased wells; interval 50 ft. Datum: sea level
Area of outcrop for the upper aquifer
Outer limit of the area of diversion for ground-water pumpage in the study area.
Figure 14. Areas of diversion and recharge for the upper aquifer.
32
SUMMARY
The Tertiary-Cretaceous aquifer system in the study area includes the basal sand in the Tuscahoma Sand, sand beds in the Nanafalia Formation, porous limestone and sand beds in the Clayton Formation, and sand beds in the Providence Sand and the upper part of the Ripley Formation. For this report, this system is divided into an upper and lower aquifer. The upper aquifer consists of the Tuscahoma Sand, the Nanafalia Formation, the Clayton Formation, and the upper part of the Providence Sand. The lower aquifer consists of the lower part of the Providence Sand and the Ripley Formation.
The aquifer test at Fort Rucker indicates that the upper aquifer has a transmissivity of about 7,800 ft2/d and coefficient of storage of about 3x10-4 .
Wells too-closely spaced, causing excessive drawdown because of inter ference when pumped, appear to be the most common problem in the study area, especially at Dothan and Fort Rucker. Wider spacing for future wells and selective pumping from existing wells should alleviate the excessive drawdown problem.
Preliminary evaluation of the aquifer system indicates that the system is in a state of hydrologic imbalance as a result of heavy pumpage at Fort Rucker, Dothan, Ozark, and Enterprise during the past 40 years. A new state of equilibrium can be attained only by an increase in recharge to or by reducing discharge from the system.
Water-quality data collected during this study and data collected during previous studies indicate that water in the aquifer system is of good chemical quality and is suitable for municipal, domestic, irrigation, and some industrial uses.
Data collected during the study indicate that the aquifer system in the study area is a reliable source of water supply for current and future uses. However, sites for additional wells should be carefully selected to avoid mutual interference between wells.
33
SELECTED REFERENCES
Adams, G. I., Butts/ Charles/ Stephenson/ L. W./ and Cooke/ C. W./ 1926/Geology of Alabama: Alabama Geological Survey Special Report 14, 312 p./97 pis./ including revised geologic map of Alabama.
Carter/ R. W./ and others/ 1949/ Water resources of southeastern Alabama:Alabama Geological Survey Special Report 21/ 265 p.
Causey/ L. V., Scott/ J. C./ and Newton/ J. G./ 1967/ Geologic map of HoustonCounty: Alabama Geological Survey Special Map 58.
Ferris/ J. G./ and others, 1962/ Theory of aquifer tests: U.S. GeologicalSurvey Water Supply Paper 1536-E/ 171 p.
Knowles, D. B./ Reade/ H. L./ Jr./ and Scott/ J. C./ 1963/ Geology and ground- water resources of Montgomery County/ Alabama: U.S. Geological SurveyWater-supply Paper 1606, 75 p.
LaMoreaux/ P. E., 1948/ Flouride in the ground water of the Tertiary area ofAlabama: Alabama Geological Survey Bulletin 59/ 77 p.
Lohman/ S. W./ 1972, Ground-water hydraulics: U.S. Geological SurveyProfessional Paper 708/ 70 p.
MacNeil/ F. S./ 1940/ Geologic map of the Tertiary formations of Alabama:U.S. Geological Survey Preliminary Oil and Gas Investigations Map 45.
Monroe/ W. H., 1941/ Notes on deposits of Selma and Ripley age in Alabama:Alabama Geological Survey Bulletin 48/ 150 p.
Newton/ J. G./ 1965/ Geologic Map of Barbour County/ Alabama: AlabamaGeological Survey Special Map 33.
____ 1968a/Geologic map of Dale County, Alabama: Alabama Geological SurveySpecial Map 63.
____ 1968b/ Geologic map of Henry County/ Alabama: Alabama GeologicalSurvey Special Map 70.
Newton/ J. G./ Golden/ H. G./ Avrett/ J. A., and Scott, J. C./ 1968/ Wateravailability/ Dale County/ Alabama: Alabama Geological Survey SpecialMap 64/ 26 p.
Newton/ J. G./ McCain/ J. F./ and Avrett/ J. A., 1968/ Water availability/Henry County/ Alabama: Alabama Geological Survey Special Map 71/ 14 p.
Sapp/ C. D./ and Emplaincourt/ J./ 1975, Physiographic regions of Alabama:Alabama Geological Survey Special Map 168.
Scott, J. C./ 1966/ Geologic map of Geneva County/ Alabama: AlabamaGeological Survey Special Map 54.
Scott/ J. C./ Golden/ H. G./ and Avrett/ J. A./ 1967/ Water availability inGeneva County/ Alabama: Alabama Geological Survey Special Map 55.
Scott, J. C./ McCain/ J. F., and Avrett/ J. A./ 1967/ Water availability inHouston County, Alabama: Alabama Geological Survey Special Map 59.
Shamberger/ V. M./ 1968/ Geologic map of Pike County/ Alabama: AlabamaGeological Survey Special Map 72.
Smith/ E. A./ 1907/ The underground water resources of Alabama: AlabamaGeological Survey Monograph 6/ 388 p.
Smith/ E. A./ Johnson/ L. C./ and Langdon/ D. W., Jr./ 1899, Report on theGeology of the Coastal Plain of Alabama: Alabama Geological SurveySpecial Report 6/ 759 p.
Toulmin/ L. D., LaMoreaux, P. E., 1963, Stratigraphy along the ChattahoocheeRiver, connecting link between Atlantic and Gulf coastal plain: AlabamaGeological Survey Reprint Series 4, 20 p.
34
Tourney, Michael, 1858, Second biennial report on the geology of Alabama:Alabama Geological Survey Biennial Report 2, 292 p.
Turner, J. D., Scott, J. C., and Newton, J. G., 1965, Geological map of CoffeeCounty, Alabama: Alabama Geological Survey Special Map 35.
Turner, J. D., Scott, J. C., Golden, H. G., and Avrett, J. A., 1968, Wateravailability, Coffee County, Alabama: Alabama Geological Survey SpecialMap 76.
35
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
wells
in
th
e
Fo
rt R
uck
er
are
a
NO
TE:
Well
num
bers
co
rresp
ond to
th
ose
show
n in
fig
ure
2.
De
pth
of
we
ll an
d w
ate
r le
ve
l:
Report
ed
depth
s an
d w
ate
r le
ve
lsg
ive
n
In fe
et,
mea
sure
d depth
s an
d w
ate
r le
ve
ls g
ive
n
in fe
et
and
ten
ths.
Wa
ter-
be
arin
g u
nit:
Kr,
R
lple
y
Form
atio
n;
Kp,
P
rovi
dence
S
and;
T
C,
Cla
yto
n
Fo
rma
tion
; T
nf,
N
anafa
lla;
Ttu
, T
usca
hom
a S
and;
T
h,
Hatc
hetlgbee
Fo
rma
tion
; T
t, T
alla
hatta
Fo
rma
tion
; T
l,
Lis
bon
Form
atio
n.
Altitu
de
: D
ete
rmin
ed
by
a
ne
roid
baro
mete
r.M
etho
d of
lift:
Cf,
ce
ntr
ifu
ga
l;
C,
cylin
de
r;
F,
flo
ws;
J,
jet;
M
, m
an
ua
l; N
, n
on
e;
S,
sub
me
rgib
le tu
rbin
e;
T,
turb
ine.
Use
o
f w
ate
r:
D,
dom
estic;
Ind,
ind
ustr
ial;
Irr,
irrig
atio
n;
P,
public
supply
; S
, sto
ck;
0,
ob
se
rva
tio
n.
Well
No. 1
Well location
(WAT
STOR
E No
.)
Owner
313421085152701
City
of
Abbeville
Year
com-
Dri
I ler
pleted
Layne-Centra 1
Co.
1965
Dept
hof
we
1 1
(ft) 470
Diam
eter
ofwell
( inc
hes)
18,
8
Water
bearing
unit
Tc,
Kp
Altitude
of
1 and
surface
(ft) 434
Water
Above
(+)
orbelow
land
surf
ace
(ft)
166
200
level Date
of
Method
measurement
of lift
10-05-65
T8-24-82
Use
ofwater
Rema
rks
P Abbevi 1
le N
o. 4
Casing:
18- in from sur-
3134
1308
5145
501
City
of
Abbevill
eLayn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
5047
518
, 8
Tc,
K
p43
017
6179.5
19
6.2
20
6.5
1950
1
-21
-65
6
-29
-82
11-1
8-8
2
face
to
38
5 ft
; 8
in
from
33
5 to
39
0 ft,
8 in
sc
ree
n
from
39
0 to
47
0 ft
. R
eport
ed
draw
dow
n 20
ft
after
pum
ping
35
0 gp
m
on
10
-05
-65
.
GSA
N
o.
J-7
A
bb
evi
I le
N
o.
2.
Casi
ng:
18
in
from
su
r
face to
35
0 ft
; 8
in
fro
m
300
to
395
ft;
8 in
sc
reen
from
39
5 to
47
5 ft
. R
eport
ed
draw
dow
n
27 ft
-a
fte
r 8
hrs
pu
mp
in
g 37
2 gp
m
in
1950
.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
In
the
Fo
rt
Ru
cke
r are
a C
ontinued
Wel
l W
ell
loca
tio
n
No.
(W
ATST
OR
E N
o.)
Ow
ner
Drille
r
Ye
ar
com
-pIe
ted
De
pth
of
well
(ft)
Dia
me
ter
of
well
(In
ch
es)
Wate
r
bearing
un
it
Altitude _
of
land
Abo
ve
(+)
or
su
rfa
ce
belo
w
land
(f
t)
su
rfa
ce
(f
t)
Wa
ter
level
Dat
e o
f m
easu
rem
ent
Met
hod
of
lift
Use
of
wate
rR
emar
ks
3 31
3428
0851
7060
1 C
ity
of
AbbevlIle
L
ayn
e-C
en
tra
I C
o.
1976
680
18,
10
Kp45
726
729
0
4 31
3303
0851
7240
1 C
ity o
f A
bb
evlIle
L
ayn
e-C
en
tra
I C
o.
1952
545
18,
8 T
C,
Kp
450
19
1.5
202
5 31
3444
0851
9010
1 W
l11le
L.
Wee
ms
H.
E.
Sm
ith
Dr
1111
ng
Co.
1963
280
4,
3T
nf,
Tc
470
186.
119
3.3
193.
7
3-04
-76
8-13
-82
2-1
0-6
5
7-2
1-8
2
1-2
1-6
5
6-0
7-8
2
6-2
8-8
2
P A
bbevlli
e
No.
5.
Ca
sin
g:
18
in
fro
m sur
face
to
60
0 ft;
10
In
from
54
0 ft to
60
5 ft
and
680
to
690
ft;
10
in
scre
en
fr
om
60
5 to
68
0 ft
. R
ep
ort
ed
dr
awdo
wn
116
ft after
2.5
h
rs
pum
ping
40
2 gp
m
on
3-0
4-7
6.
P G
SA
No:
K
-5,
Ab
be
vlli
e
No.
3.
C
asi
ng:
18
In
from
surf
ace to
42
5 ft
;
8 In
fr
om
36
5 to
43
0 ft;
8 In
sc
reen
fro
m
430
to
545
ft.
Report
ed
dra
w
dow
n 30
ft after
8 hrs
pu
mpi
ng
351
gpm
In
19
52.
D G
SA
No.
K
-3Ca
sing
: 4
In from sur
face t
o 229
ft;
3 in
from 229
to 2
60 ft;
3 In
screen from 2
60 to 2
80
ft.
Reported Iy
pumped
at 2
5 gpm
In 19
63.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we I
Is
In
the
F
ort
R
uck
er
are
a C
on
tin
ue
d
Well
No.
Well
lo
cati
on
(WAT
STOR
E No
.)Owner
Drl Her
Diam
e-
Altitude_____Water le
vel
Year
De
pth
ter
of
Wate
r-
of land
Above
{+)
orcom-
of well
well
bear
ing
surf
ace
below
land
pleted
(ft)
(Inches)
unit
(f
t)
surfac
e (f
t)Date of
meas
urem
ent
Meth
od
of lift
Use
of
water
Remarks
313311085263201
Dale
Cou
nty
Water
Authority
Smith
Well an
d Supply C
o.19
8272
512
, 6
Kp,
K
r48
4
3133
3308
5330
401
Dale
C
ou
nty
B
oard
o
f
Educa
tI o
nA
lto
n
Po
we
lI
Dr
11 1
1 ng
C
o.
1963
270.4
2
6,
4 T
nf
447
3134
3408
5355
201
Ple
asa
nt
Rid
ge
Chu
rch
Carr
ol
I H
ard
wa
re
1965
240
Tn
f47
8
325
160
15
6.4
172.
2
173.
3
17
6.6
178.3
178.
6
11-0
1-8
2
7-3
0-6
3
6-0
7-8
2
6-2
8-8
2
11-1
8-8
2
6-23
-65
2-09
-82
6-28
-82
Ca
sin
g:
12
In
from
sur
fa
ce to
55
0 ft
; 6
In
from
51
0 to
57
0 ft
; 6
In
scre
en
fro
m
570
to
590
ft,
650
to
670
ft
and
705
to
725
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 10
9 ft
a
fte
r 24
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
450
gpm
on
1
1-0
1-8
2.
Ele
ctr
ic
log
s a
va
ilab
le
in
the file
s
of
USG
S.
GSA
N
o.
B-8
Casi
ng:
6 in
fr
om
sur
fa
ce to
24
8 ft
; 4
in
from
24
1 to
250.4
2 ft;
4 in
sc
ree
n
from
250.4
2
to 270.4
2 ft
. R
eport
ed
draw
dow
n 60
ft
after
5 hrs
pu
mpi
ng
131
gpm
on
7-3
0-6
3.
GSA
N
o:
C-3
C
asi
ng:
4 in
fr
om
sur
fa
ce to
17
8 ft
; no
ne
be
low
.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
In th
e
Fo
rt
Ruck
er
are
a C
ontinued
Well
No.
Well lo
cati
on(W
ATST
ORE
No.)
Owne
r
Year
com-
Drlller
plat
ed
Dept
hof
we 1
1(ft)
D 1 ame-
ter
ofwell
( Inches)
Water
bear
ing
unit
Alti
tude
of land
surface
(ft)
Water
Above
(+)
orbe
low
land
surf
ace
(ft)
level Date
of
meas
urem
ent
Method
of li
ftUse
ofwater
Remarks
9 31
3608
0854
3210
1 To
wn
of
Arlto
nA
lto
n
Pow
ell
Drl I
ling
Co.
1959
364
Tc,
K
p43
415
5155.6
148.
6
10-1
9-5
9
2-0
8-8
2
6-2
8-8
2
GSA
N
o:
D-5
, A
rlto
n
No.
2.
C
asi
ng
: 6
In
fro
m
surf
ace to
22
3 ft
; no
ne
belo
w.
Report
ed
dra
w
dow
n 19
ft
a
fte
r 1.5
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
70
gpm
on
1
0-1
9-5
9.
10
3135
5608
5430
801
Tow
n o
f A
rlto
nG
ray
Art
esia
n
Well
Co.
1946
668
Tc,
K
p,
Kr
479
11
3135
5708
5423
001
Tow
n of
Arlto
nL
ayn
e-C
en
tra
I C
o.
1974
440
16,
8 Tc,
Kp520
12
313338085504601
Jenny Alien
English
Well
and
Supp
ly C
o.1981
260
Tc315
189
179
235
237
235.2
62.6
62.7
1946 1-03-75
6-12-81
2-08-82
11-15-82
2-19
-82
7-01
-82
GSA
No:
D-7,
Arlton No.
1.
Casing:
8 In
from
surface
to 272
ft;
none
below. Re
port
ed dr
awdo
wn
12 f
t after
8 hrs
pump-
Ing
90 g
pm In 1946.
Arit
on #3.
Casi
ng:
16 In
from surface
to 3
30 ft;
8 In from 270
to 3
35 ft
and
385
to 4
10 ft;
8 in
sc
reen
from 335
to 3
85
ft a
nd 410
to 4
40 f
t.
Reported dr
awdo
wn 53 ft
af
ter
14 hrs
pumping
201
gpm
on 01
-03-
75.
Casi
ng:
4 in
from sur
face to 2
40 ft;
none
below.
Table
1.
Reco
rds
of walls
in th
e Fo
rt R
ucke
r ar
ea C
ontinued
Well
No. 13 14
Well lo
cati
on(WATSTORE
No.)
Owne
r
313306085490201
Gene
Sm
ith
Evan
gel istic
Asso
ciat
ion
313307085521701
Town
of New
Hope
Dril
ler
Engl
ish
We I!
and
Supp
ly Co.
Engl
ish
Wel
1an
d Su
pply
Co.
Dlam
e-
Alti
tude
Water
Year
Depth
ter
of
Wate
r-
of la
nd
Above
(+)
orco
m-
of well
wal
i bearing
surf
ace
below
land
pleted
(ft)
(Inches)
unit
(ft)
su
rfac
e (ft)
1981
200
6 Tc
327
60 58.0
58.2
1974
242
6, 3
Tc
350
95 93.8
leve
l Date
of
Method
measurement
of lift
1981
S
2-19-82
7-01-82
3-30-74
S11-15-82
Use
ofwa
ter
Remarks
P Casing:
6 In
from sur
face
to 16
5 ft;
none
belo
w. Reported drawdown
5 ft af
ter
6 hrs
pumping
60 gpm
in
19
81.
P Ne
w Hope #1.
Casing:
6 in
fr
om su
rfac
e to
15
313005085541001
Sout
hlan
d Broilers
Layne-CentraI
Co.
1978
430
24
, 12
T
c,
Kp
335
100
12
-20
-78
16.
31
27
59
08
55
03
40
1F
ort
R
uck
er
Milita
ry
J.
D.
Hughes
and
1982
Reserv
ation
Son
W
ell
Drillin
g
46
0T
c46
32
55
260.5
260.8
11
-22
-81
12-0
2-8
1
11-1
1-8
2
202
ft;
3 In
fr
om
su
r
face to
12
6 ft
; n
on
e
belo
w.
Re
po
rte
d
dra
wd
ow
n
7 ft after
48
hrs
p
um
p-
Ing
170
gpm
on
3-3
0-7
4.
Ind.
Casin
g:
24
In
fro
m su
r
face to
2
45
ft
; 12
In
fro
m
190
to
25
0 ft
and
43
0 to
4
40
ft;
12
in
scre
en
fr
om
2
50
to
430
ft.
Report
ed
dra
wd
ow
n
73 ft after
24
hrs
p
um
p-
Ing
900 g
pm
on
12
-20
-78
.
M O
ld T
ab
ern
acle
.
Casin
g:
4 In
fr
om
su
r
face
to
4
26
ft
; n
on
e
be
low
. R
ep
ort
ed
d
raw
do
wn
25.5
ft after
48
hrs
pum
pin
g
30
gpm
11-2
3-8
1.
Table
1.
R
eco
rds
of
wells
In
th
e
Fo
rt
Ruck
er
are
a C
ontinued
Well
No. 17 18 19 20 21
Dla
me-
Altitu
de
W
ate
rY
ear
De
pth
te
r o
f W
ate
r-
of
land
A
bove
(+
) or
Well
loca
tio
n
com
- o
f w
ell
well
bearing
su
rfa
ce
belo
w
land
(W
ATST
OR
E N
o.)
O
wne
r D
rille
r ple
ted
(ft)
(I
nch
es)
unit
(ft)
su
rfa
ce
(f
t)
3128
5708
5470
101
Fort
R
uck
er
Ml
1 Ita
ry
J.
D.
Hug
hes
and
1982
42
0 4
Tc
470
26
0.6
Re
se
rva
tio
n
Son
W
el 1
D
rl 1
1 I
ng
259.2
2
60
.8
3131
4008
5401
201
C.
H.
Carr
ol
1 C
arr
ol
1 H
ard
wa
re
1982
48
5 4
Tc
530
27
1.2
O
zark
, A
la.
27
0.4
3129
5908
5392
501
Tow
n of
Oza
rk
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
a 1
Co.
19
72
...
..
Kr
443
298.9
3128
5808
5403
701
Doyl
e C
h Is
m
Carr
ol
1 H
ard
wa
re
1965
33
0 4
Tc
322
92.4
10
8.8
3127
4308
5402
501
Woo
d la
wn
Mem
ory
Carr
ol
1 H
ard
wa
re
1961
34
5 4
Tn
f,
Tc
295
59.2
Gar
den
53.
1 5
2.2
leve
l
Da
te
of
Met
hod
mea
sure
men
t o
f 1 1
ft
12-0
2-8
1
S 6
-29
-82
11
-16
-82
10
-03
-82
S
11
-18
-82
12-0
4-81
T
6-2
9-6
5
S 2-1
0-8
2
6-2
9-6
5
S
2-1
0-8
2
6-2
8-8
2
Use
o
f w
ate
r R
emar
ks
M Longstr
eet
Fie
ld.
Ca
sin
g:
4 In
fr
om
sur
fa
ce to
36
6 ft;
none
be
low
. R
eport
ed
draw
dow
n 13
.9 ft
after
49
hrs
pum
ping
30
gpm
1
1-1
9-8
1.
D C
asi
ng:
4 In
fr
om
sur
fa
ce to
3
00
+,
none
b
elo
w.
P O
zark
N
o.
5.
Ele
ctr
ic
logs
ava
l la
ble
In
f
I le
s o
f U
S6S
.
D 6S
A N
o:
F-8
. C
asi
ng
: 4
In
from
su
r
face
to
29
4 ft;
none
be
low
. R
eport
ed
to
pum
p 10
gpm
on
6-2
9-6
5.
Irr
6SA
N
o:
F-1
4.
Ca
sin
g:
4 In
fr
om
sur
fa
ce to
15
0 ft;
none
be
low
. R
eport
ed
to
pum
p
20 g
pm
on
6-2
9-6
5.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
in th
e
Fo
rt R
uck
er
are
a C
ontinued
Well
Well
loca
tio
n
No.
(W
ATST
OR
E N
o. >
Ow
ner
Drille
r
Yea
r D
epth
com
- of
we 1
1ple
ted
(ft)
Dia
me
ter
of
we
ll (I
nch
es)
Wate
r
be
arin
g
un
it
Altitude _
________
of
land
A
bove
(+
) or
surf
ace
belo
w
land
(f
t)
surf
ace (f
t)
Water
level Date o
f me
asur
emen
tMe
thod
of lift
Use
of
water
Remarks
22
3126
3908
5361
601
Tow
n of
Oza
rkLayne-CentraI
Co.
1967
815
18,
10
Kr
409
23
3127
1408
5380
801
Tow
n o
f O
zark
Layne-CentraI
Co.
1954
813
16,
10
Kr
403
24
3127
1908
5384
301
Tow
n o
f O
zark
Layne-CentraI
Co.
1946
845
16,
8 K
r44
2
267.5
187
237.
6284.9
210
247.4
29
8.0
12-0
7-8
1
1954
7-1
3-6
5
12-0
8-8
1
1946
7-1
3-6
5
12-1
0-81
Oza
rk
No.
4
. C
asi
ng
: 18
in
fr
om
sur
face
to
75
0 ft;
10
In
from
67
0 to
75
5 ft;
10
In
scre
en
fr
om
75
5 to
81
5 ft
. R
eport
ed
dra
w
dow
n 89
ft
a
fte
r 24
h
rs
pum
ping
75
0 gp
m
In
1968
.
6SA
No.
F
-17
. O
zark
No.
2.
C
asi
ng:
16
In
from
surf
ace to
75
0 ft;
10
In
from
66
5 to
75
3 ft
; 10
In
sc
ree
n
from
75
3 to
813
ft.
Report
ed
dra
w
dow
n 47
ft
whe
n pu
mpe
d at
735
gpm
In
19
54.
6SA
No.
F
-16
, O
zark
N
o.
1.
Ca
sin
g:
16
In
fro
m
su
rfa
ce
to
42
0 ft;
8 in
fr
om
su
rfa
ce
to
80
5 ft;
8 in
sc
ree
n
from
80
5 to
84
5 ft.
Report
ed
dra
w
dow
n 10
ft
whe
n pu
mpe
d at
197
gpm
In
19
46.
Table
1.
R
ecor
ds o
f w
ells
In
th
e
Fo
rt
Ruc
ker
are
a C
ontin
ued
Well
Well location
No.
(WAT
STOR
E No
.)
Owne
r
25
313150085290601
JoeS
nell
26
312828085304101
Bethel Ch
urch
27
312746085341701
Jerr
y Grammont
28
312643085191801
James
Gold
en
29
31233508516101
John Solomon
Dlam
e-
Altitude
Water
Year
De
pth
ter
of
Wate
r-
of la
nd
Above
(+)
or
com-
of well
well
bearing
surf
ace
belo
w land
Driller
plet
ed
(ft)
(Inc
hes)
unit
(ft)
su
rface
(ft)
Carr
ol 1
Hardware
....
90
4 Tn
f 255
1.4
0.6
Carr
ol 1
Hardware
1961
28
5 4
Ttu,
Tn
f 36
7 13
4.1
150.
914
8.5
Carr
ol 1
Hardware
1964
153
4 Tn
f 225
1.6
1.7
1.7
Smit
h Well an
d 1979
560
8 Tc,
Kp
380
200
Supp
ly C
o.
206
207
212
Smith
We II
and
1981
680
12,
8 Kp
370
220
Supply Co.
229
241
leve
l Date
of
measurement
2-09
-82
6-28-82
6-17-65
2-09
-82
6-28-82
2-09
-82
6-28
-82
11-16-82
4-06
-79
2-17-82
6-29
-82
11-18-82
1981 2-16
-82
11-17-82
Method
Use
of
of li
ft
water
Remarks
J D
GSA
No.
G-1. Casing:
4in
from su
rfac
e to 42
ft;
none
below. Measured
flow
27
gpm
on 6-08-65.
S D
GSA
No.
G-8. Casing:
4In from su
rfac
e to
185
ft;
none
below.
J D
GSA
No.
G-9. Casing:
4In from surface
63 ft;
none
below. Es
tima
ted
flow
1 gp
m on
6-18-65.
S Ir
r Casing:
8 In from sur
face
to 410
ft;
none
below. Reported drawdown
25 ft after
8 hrs
pump-
Ing
400 gpm
on 4-06-79.
T Ir
r Casing:
12 In from su
rface to 50
0 ft
; 8
infrom 4
90 (?
) to 630
ft;
8 In
sc
reen
fr
om 6
30 t
o
680
ft.
Rep
orte
d dr
aw
dow
n 10
5 ft
a
fte
r 36
h
rs
pum
ping
70
0 gp
m.
Table
1.
Records
of welIs
In the
Fort R
ucker
area
Con
tinu
ed
Well
Well lo
cati
on
No.
(WATSTORE
No.)
Owner
Driller
DIam
e-
A111
tude
_________
Year
Depth
ter
of
Wate
r-
of land
Above
(+)
orcom-
of well
well
bear
ing
surface
below
land
pleted
(ft)
(inc
hes)
unit
(ft)
surface
(ft)
Wa
ter
level
Da
te o
f m
easu
rem
ent
Met
hod
Use
of
of
lift
wate
rRemarks
30
312534085203401
Town of
NewviIle
Tom
Smit
h Artesian W
e 11
Co.
1974
420
8, 4
Tnf
394
165
227
1-23-74
2-17
-82
Newv
i ile
No.
2.
Casi
ng:
8 in from su
rfac
e to 370
ft;
4 in from 310
to 378
ft;
4 in screen from 370
to 4
20 ft.
Repo
rted
drawdown 86 ft
after
24
hrs
pumping
210 gpm
on
1-23-74.
31
312453085274801
Fort
Ruc
ker
Mi IIt
ary
Carrol I
Hardware
1969
365
4, 2
Tnf
Rese
rvat
I on
356
177.
96
12-01-81
S 152.54
6-29-82
32
312451085275001
Fort
Rucker
M11 It
ary
Buie
Dr1
1 I i
ng Co.
1976
303
8 Reservation
Ttu
, T
nf
355
152
6-1
4-7
6
S14
4 1
2-0
1-8
117
4 6-2
9-8
2166.0
1
1-1
6-8
2
M G
old
be
rg
Fie
ld
No.
2.
Ca
sin
g:
4 In
fr
om
su
r
face
to
21
4 ft
. R
eport
ed
to
pum
p 14
gp
m.
M G
old
berg
F
ield
N
o.
3.
Ca
sin
g:
8 in
fr
om
su
r
face
to
23
8 ft
; no
ne
beio
w.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 29
ft
w
hen
pum
ped
at
39
gpm
on
6-1
4-7
6.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
In
the
Fort
R
uck
er
are
a C
ontinued
Well
No.
Well
location
(WAT
STO
RE
No.)
O
wne
r
Yea
rco
m-
Drlller
ple
ted
Dep
th
of
we
ll(f
t)
Dia
me
ter
of
we
ll(I
nch
es)
Wa
ter
be
arin
gunit
Altitu
de
of
land
su
rfa
ce
(ft)
Wa
ter
Abo
ve
(+)
or
belo
w
land
surf
ace (f
t)
leve
l
Da
te
of
mea
sure
men
tM
etho
do
f lift
Use
o
fw
ate
rR
emar
ks
33
3122
1008
5240
801
Fa
ulk
ne
r F
arm
sS
mith
W
ell
and
Supply
C
o.
1979
720
12,
8T
c,
Kp,
Kr
(?)
349
204
214
212.7
2-1
9-8
2
11
-17
-82
3431
2318
0853
5020
1A
laba
ma
Hig
hw
ay
Depart
ment
Ala
bam
a H
ighw
ay
Depart
ment
1975
270
, 3
Ttu
335
16
1.3
170.4
3-1
8-7
5
6-0
7-8
3
Irr
Ca
sin
g:
12
In
fro
m sur
face
to
46
0 ft
; 8
in
fro
m
450
(?)
to
515
ft,
525
to
530
ft,
550
to
555
ft,
575
to
580
ft,
600
to
620
ft,
640
to
643
ft,
and
645
to
690
ft;
8 In
sc
ree
n
fro
m
515
to
525,
530
to
550
ft,
555
to
575
ft,
580
to
600
ft,
620
to
640
ft,
643
to
645
ft,
and
690
to
720
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 66
ft after
24
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
1200
gp
m.
P C
asi
ng
: 4
In
fro
m sur
fa
ce to
23
0 ft;
3 In
sc
ree
n
fro
m
230
to
270
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 12
.6 ft after
18.5
h
rs
pum
ping
27
gp
m
3-1
8-7
5.
3531
2239
0853
4490
1U
.S.
Ge
olo
gic
al
Surv
ey
Sm
ith
Well
and
Supply
C
o.
1980
453
6, 4
Tc24
590.5
10-15-80
Casi
ng:
6 In
from s
ur
face t
o 210
ft;
4 In
from 192 to
433 f
t and
453 to
474 ft;
4 In
screen from 4
33 to
453
ft.
Table
1.
Records
of we I is
in
th
e Fort Rucker
area
Con
tinu
ed
Dia
me-
A
ltitu
de
W
ater
Yea
r D
ep
th
ter
of
Wa
ter-
of
land
Abo
ve
(+)
or
Well
Well
location
com
- o
f w
ell
well
bearing
surf
ace
belo
w
land
N
o.
(WAT
STO
RE
No.
)
Ow
ner
Drille
r p
lete
d
(ft)
(I
nch
es)
un
it
(ft)
su
rfa
ce
(f
t)
36
3122
4008
5344
801
Fo
rt R
uck
er
Ml
1 Ita
ry
Sm
ith W
ell
and
1978
...
...
Tc
247
80
Re
serv
atio
n
Su
pp
ly
Co.
94.9
37
3126
0008
5401
101
Tow
n o
f O
zark
L
ayn
e-C
en
tra
1 C
o.
1962
90
0 18
, 10
K
r 43
0 23
6 2
48
.3
309.0
38
3124
3908
5383
101
Tow
n o
f O
zark
Layn
e-C
entr
a 1
Co.
19
78
880
20,
10
Kr
340
185
22
0.0
39
3125
3408
5470
401
Fo
rt R
uck
er
Mi
1 ita
ry
Carr
ol
1 H
ard
wa
re
1975
23
0 4
,3
Ttu
39
6 18
3
Re
serv
atio
n
184.
1 16
4.9
187.
2
level
Da
te o
f m
easu
rem
ent
6-1
4-7
8
12-0
1-8
1
3-1
4-6
2
7-1
3-6
5
12-0
4-8
1
3-2
9-7
8
12-0
3-8
1
1 1-2
0-8
1
6-2
8-8
2
11-1
6-8
2
Met
hod
Use
of
of
lift
w
ate
r R
emar
ks
S M
Hun
t F
ield
. R
eport
ed
draw
dow
n 13
ft
after
36
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
50 g
pm
on
6-1
4-7
8.
Ele
ctr
ic
log
s availa
ble
in
th
e file
s
of
USG
S.
T P
GSA
N
o.
K-1
. O
zark
N
o.
3.
Casi
ng:
18
in
from
su
rfa
ce
to
83
2 ft
; 10
in
fr
om
75
2 to
84
0 ft;
10
in
scre
en
fr
om
84
0 to
90
0 ft
. R
eport
ed
dra
w
dow
n 48
ft
whe
n pu
mpe
d
at
681
gpm
.
T P
Oza
rk
No.
6
. C
asi
ng:
20
in
from
su
rfa
ce
to
76
5 ft
; 10
in
fr
om
70
0 to
77
0 ft
; 10
in
sc
reen
fro
m
770
to
880
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 20
0 ft
after
24
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
709
gpm
on
3
-29
-78
.
S M
Ran
ge H
ea
dq
ua
rte
rs.
Ca
sin
g:
4 In
fr
om
su
r
face to
21
0 ft;
3 In
sc
ree
n
fro
m
210
to
230
ft.
Reported to p
ump
25
gpm.
Tabl
e 1.
Records
of wells
in t
he Fort R
ucker
area
Con
tinu
ed
Well
Well location
No.
(WATSTORE
No.
)
40
312428085425701
41
312409085431701
42
3123
2808
5433
401
43
3123
5708
5432
601
Owner
Driller
Fort Ruc
ker Military
....
....
.Re
serv
atio
n
Fort R
ucker Military
Carrol 1
Hard
ware
Rese
rvat
ion
Fort Ruc
ker Military Carrol I
Hardware
Rese
rvat
ion
Fort
Rucker
Military
Carrol 1
Hardware
Reservation
Dlame-
Alti
tude
Water
Year
Depth
ter
of
Wate
r-
of la
nd
Abov
e (+)
orco
m-
of well
well
bear
ing
surface
belo
w land
pleted
(ft)
(Inc
hes)
unit
(ft)
surfac
e (ft)
....
...
...
Ttu
(?)
224
50.5
....
...
...
Ttu
(?)
247
45.0
1977
257
4, 3
Tnf
215
37 59.2
1975
215
4 Tnf
241
53.5
53.8
level Date
of
measurement
12-03-81
12-03-81
3-02-77
11-19-81
11-19-81
6-29
-82
Method
Use
ofof
li
ft
water
Remarks
S M
Engi
neer
Beach
S M
Girl Scout
Camp
S M
Wildlife A
rea.
Ca
sing
:4
In from surface
to 199
ft,
3 In from 195
to 237
ft;
3 In screen from 2
37to 2
57 ft.
Repo
rted
drawdown 20
ft a
fter
pump
ing
30 g
pm 3
-02-
77.
S M
Enlisted M
en's
Be
ach.
Casi
ng:
4 In from sur-
44
3123
5108
5424
601
Fort Rucker
Ml IIt
ary
Carrol I
Hard
ware
1970
Rese
rvat
ion
135
6Ttu
226
45
3122
0708
5444
901
National Gu
ard
Smith
Well and
1977
Supp
ly C
o.31
5 12,
6 Tt
u, T
nf
293
46.1
124
11-1
9-81
2-16
-77
face to 200
ft;
3 In
screen from 200
to 215
ft.
M Lake L
odge
. Ca
sing
: 6
in from surface
to 8
5 ft;
none below.
M Casing:
12 in
from sur
face t
o 170
ft;
6 In
from
145
to 200
ft;
6 In
screen from 200
to 3
05
ft.
Repo
rted
dr
awdo
wn
37.5
ft a
fter 4
hrs
pump
ing
250 gpm
2-16
-77.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we I
Is
In th
e
Fort
R
uck
er
are
a C
on
tin
ue
d
Well
No.
Well lo
cati
on(WATSTORE
No.)
Owne
r
Year
com-
Drlller
pleted
Depth
of well
(ft)
Diam
eter
ofwell
(Inc
hes)
Water
bear
ing
unit
Alti
tude
of
1 and
surface
(ft)
Water
Above
(+)
orbelow
land
surf
ace
(ft)
level Date of
measurement
Method
of li
ftUse
ofwater
Remarks
4631
2132
0854
5080
1F
ort
R
uck
er
Milita
ry
Re
serv
atI
on
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
5668
216
, 8
Tc,
K
p29
010
5
118.9
169.
514
3.2
8-2
8-5
6
7-1
6-6
5
11-1
9-8
1
6-2
9-8
2
GSA
N
o.
L-4
. Lo
we
Fie
ld.
Ca
sin
g:
16
In
fro
m su
r
face to
37
0 ft;
8 In
fr
om
31
0 to
37
5 ft,
380
to
554
ft,
574
to
600
ft
and
615
to
662
ft;
8 In
scre
en
fro
m
375
to
380
ft,
554
to
574
ft,
600
to
615
ft
and
662
to
682
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 82
ft after
pum
ping
40
2 gp
m
on
8-2
8-5
6.
4731
2138
0854
3100
1F
ort
R
uck
er
Milita
ry
Re
serv
atI
on
Layr
ie-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
7965
02
4,
16
Tc,
K
p28
113
6
14
0.9
137.
8
4-0
7-7
9
11-1
9-8
1
6-2
9-8
2
Fort
R
uck
er
No.
7
.
Ca
sin
g:
24
In
fro
m su
r
face to
37
5 ft
; 16
In
fr
om
30
0 to
38
0 ft
, an
d 51
0 to
54
0 ft;
16
In
scre
en
fr
om
38
0 to
51
0
ft
and
540
to
650
ft.
Ele
ctr
ic
log
s availa
ble
In
th
e file
s
of
USG
S.
48
3121
3308
5520
01
Cit
y
of
En
terp
rise
Car
loss
W
e 11
D
rillin
g
Co.
1970
748
24
, 10
T
c,
Kp
418
255
1970
Ente
rprise
No.
6.
Casi
ng:
24
In
fro
m su
r
face
to
52
0 ft;
10
In
from
44
8 to
62
0 ft,
664
to
680
ft,
700
to
705
ft,
725
to
732
ft;
10
In
scre
en
fr
om
62
0 to
66
4 ft,
680
to
700
ft,
705
to
725
ft
and
732
to
748
ft.
.Ele
ctr
icav
al t
ab
le
In tr
of
USG
S.'files
Ta
ble
1.
R
ecor
ds o
f w
ells
In
th
e
Fo
rt R
ucke
r are
a C
ontin
ued
Well
No.
Well
lo
cati
on
(WAT
STOR
E No.)
Owner
Driller
Year
com
pleted
Dept
hof well
(ft)
Diam
e
ter
ofwell
(Inc
hes)
Wate
r
bearing
unit
Altitude_________
of land
Above
(+)
or
surface
below
land
(ft)
surface
(ft)
Wat
er
leve
l
Dat
e of
mea
sure
men
tM
etho
d o
f lift
Use
of
wat
erR
emar
ks
49
3122
0308
5510
301
Fort
Ruc
ker
MI Iita
ry
Acm
e O
r 111
Ing
Co.
R
ese
rva
tI o
n19
6164
0T
c,
Kp39
520
024
325
725
5
3-28
-61
12-0
2-81
6-3
0-8
2
11-1
6-82
GSA
N
o.
1-3
. S
he
ll F
ield
A
ux.
Fie
ld
No.
3.
C
asi
ng
: 8
in
from
sur
fa
ce to
54
0 ft;
none
be
low
. R
epor
ted
draw
dow
n 27
.3 ft
a
fte
r 8
hrs
pum
ping
46
5 gp
m
3-2
8-6
1.
Ele
ctr
ic
logs
availa
ble
in
file
s
of
USG
S.
50
3123
0208
5555
901
Tow
n o
f N
ew B
roct
on
L
ayn
e-C
en
tra
I C
o.
1962
534
12,
6 T
c44
524
16
-15
-62
5131
2331
0855
5340
1 To
wn
of
New
Bro
cton
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
7764
516
Tc
447
266
271
296.
9
6-16
-78
1-07
-82
11-1
1-82
GSA
N
o.
J-5,
New
Bro
cto
n
No.
2.
C
asin
g:
12
In
from
su
rfa
ce to
483
ft;
6 In
fr
om 4
23 t
o
488
ft,
498
to
506
ft,
and
516
to
524
ft;
6 In
sc
reen
fr
om
488
to 4
98 ft
, 50
6 to
51
6 ft
an
d 52
4 to
53
4 ft
. R
epor
ted
draw
dow
n 15
ft
after
8 h
rs
pum
p-
Ing
104
gpm
6-1
5-6
2.
New
Bro
cton
N
o.
3.
Ca
sin
g:
16
In
from
su
r
face
to
52
7 ft;
none
be
low
. R
epor
ted
draw
dow
n 60
ft
a
fte
r 24
h
rs
pum
p-
Ing
293
gpm
6-1
6-7
8.
Table
1.
R
ecor
ds o
f w
ells
In
th
e
Fo
rt R
ucke
r are
a C
ontin
ued
Well
No.
Well lo
cati
on(W
ATST
ORE
No.
) Owner
Year
com-
Driller
pleted
Depth
of wall
(ft)
Diam
eter
ofwall
(Inc
hes)
Water
bear
ing
unit
Altitude
of la
ndsurface
(ft)
Water
Above
(+)
orbelow
land
surf
ace
(ft)
level Date
of
meas
urem
ent
Meth
odof li
ftUse
ofwa
ter
Remarks
52
3123
0908
5554
501
Tow
n of
New
Bro
cton
L
ayn
e-C
en
tra
I C
o.
1941
35
8 1
2,8
T
tu,
Tnf
455
242
5-15
-41
T
53
3121
2908
5573
201
R.
S.
Str
lck
lan
dS
eabo
ard
Oil
Co.
of
Del
awar
e36
91388
6SA
No.
J-4; New Brocton
No.
1. Ca
sing
: 12 In
from
surface
to 2
99 ft;
screen 8
In 299 to
358
ft.
Repo
rted
Iy
pumped
100 gpm
5-15
-41.
Oil Test Well
542.
Data used for
geol
ogic
and
hydr
olog
ic c
ontrol.
Elec
tric
log
In fI
les
of USGS.
54
311900085560601
Shel
ly W
alls
J.D. Hughes and
1963
Son
Well Dr
illi
ng C
o.510
Ttu
, T
nf
376
55
3116
4408
5592
501
Tow
n o
f G
oodm
an
Acm
e D
ri111
ng
Co.
19
77
783
8,6
T
c36
0
161.
9
202
224
190.
1
2-1
9-8
2
8-29
-77
7-28
-82
11-1
2-82
6SA
No.
0-3
. C
asin
g:
4 in
fr
om su
rface
to
212
ft
; no
ne
belo
w.
Goo
dman
No.
1.
C
asin
g:
8 In
fr
om su
rfa
ce to
68
2 ft;
6 In
fr
om 6
54 to
74
0 ft
an
d 6
In
scre
en
from
740
to
783
ft.
Rep
orte
d dr
awdo
wn
59 ft
after
12
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
240
gpm
on
8
-29
-77
.
Table
1.
Records
of we
lls
In t
he Fort R
ucker ar
ea C
onti
nued
Well
No.
Well
lo
cati
on(WATSTORE
No.)
Owner
Year
com-
Dril
ler
pleted
Depth
of well
(ft)
Diam
ete
r of
well
(inc
hes)
Alti
tude
Water
Wate
rbe
arin
gunit
of land
surface
(ft)
Abov
e (+)
orbelow
land
surface
(ft)
level Date o
fme
asur
emen
tMe
thod
of li
ftUse
ofwa
ter
Remarks
56
312005085510401
City
of
Enterprise
Layne-CentraI
Co.
1961
750
24,
10Tnf, Tc,
380
Kp200
246.
7250.5
6-01-61
12-14-81
11-11-82
57
311923085493901
City o
f Enterprise
La
yne-
Cent
ra I
Co.
1979
753
24,
10
Tc,
Kp352
220
224.1
229.1
1-09
-79
12-15-81
7-01
-82
6SA
No.
P-1, Enterprise
No.
4. Ca
sing
: 24
in
from su
rfac
e to
460 ft;
10 In from su
rfac
e to
465
ft,
475
to 4
95 ft,
515
to 535
ft,
545 to
567
ft,
577
to 598
ft,
608 to
630 ft,
640
to
670
ft,
680
to 7
00 f
t and
710
to 7
40 ft;
10 In
screen from 4
65 t
o 475
ft,
495
to 515
ft,
535
to 5
45 ft,
567
to 577
ft,
598 to
608 ft,
630
to 6
40 ft,
670
to 6
80
ft,
700 to 7
10 ft and
740
to 7
50 ft.
Draw
down
66 f
t after
8 hrs
pump-
Ing
650
gpm
on 6-01-61.
Enterprise N
o. 7.
Casi
ng:
24 In from s
ur
face t
o 560
ft;
10 In
from 4
85 t
o 565
ft,
585
to 5
95 ft,
610
to 6
20
ft,
630
to 6
40 ft,
665
to 6
75 ft,
and
695
to
713
ft;
10
in screen
from 565
to 585
ft,
595
to 6
10 ft,
620
to 6
30
ft,
640 to 6
65 ft,
675
to 6
95 ft a
nd 713
to 7
53
ft.
Repo
rted
dr
awdo
wn
141
ft a
fter 5
hrs
pump-
Ing 824
gpm
on 1-
09-7
9.
Table
1.
R
ecor
ds of
we
lls
In th
e
Fort
Ruc
ker
are
a C
ontin
ued
Well
No. 58
Me II
location
(WATSTORE
No.)
Owner
311900085500001
City
of
Enterprise
Year
com-
Driller
pleted
Layn
e-Ce
ntra
1 Co.
1967
Dept
hof
we
ll(ft) 772
Diam
ete
r of
wall
( Inc
hes)
24,
10
Water-
bear
1 ng
unit
Tnf,
Tc,
Kp
Alti
tude
of land
surface
(ft) 382
Water
Above
(+)
orbelow
land
surface
(ft)
233
249.6
level Date
of
meas
urem
ent
1 1-0
3-67
12-14-81
Method
of li
ft
T
Use
ofwa
ter
P
Remarks
Enterprise N
o. 5.
Casing:
24 In
from s
ur-
59311844085511201
City
of
Ente
rpri
se
Layne-CentraI
Co.
1943
770
18,
10Ttu, Tn
f,
Tc,
Kp362
163
217.7
226.
4
1944
1-
04-8
2 6-11-82
face t
o 480
ft;
10 In
from 4
28 t
o 485
ft,
495
to 5
05 f
t, 515
to 6
25
ft,
645
to 6
82 ft,
692
to 702 f
t, and
712
to
732
ft;
10 In
screen
from 4
85 t
o 495
ft,
505
to 5
15 ft,
625
to 6
45
ft,
682
to 6
92 ft,
702
to 7
12 ft,
and
732
to
' 772
ft.
Repo
rted
draw
down
60 ft after
12 hrs
pump
ing
752 gpm
on
11-03-67.
6SA
No.
P-4,
En
terp
rise
No.
1, COF
1.
Casing:
18 In
fr
om s
ur
face to 3
10 ft;
10 In
from 2
80 t
o 343
ft,
398
to 4
12 ft,
432 to 485
ft,
505
to 5
19 ft,
544
to 6
90 ft a
nd 710
to 7
45
ft;
10 In
screen fr
om
343
to 3
98 ft,
412
to
432
ft,
485
to 505
ft,
519 to
544
ft a
nd 690 to
710
ft.
Repo
rted
dr
aw
down
13 ft a
fter 8
hrs
pump
ing
280 gpm
In 19
44.
Ta
ble
1.
R
ecor
ds o
f w
ells
In
th
e
Fort
Ruc
ker
are
a C
ontin
ued
Well
No.
Well
location
(WAT
STO
RE N
o.)
Owner
Year
com-
Drlller
pleted
Dept
hof we 1
1(ft)
Diam
eter
ofwell
(Inc
hes)
Water
bear
ing
unit
Alti
tude
of land
surface
(ft)
Water
Above
(+)
orbe
low
land
surf
ace
(ft)
level Date
of
measurement
Method
of li
ftUse
ofwater
Remarks
6031
1843
0855
1110
1 C
ity of
Ente
rprise
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
5976
5 24
, 10
Tn
f,
Tc,
36
0 Kp
180
239.
222
8.0
61
3119
0808
5513
001
City
of
En
terp
rise
Gra
y A
rte
sia
n
WeI
I C
o.19
3460
612
Tnf,
Tc
364
243.
6
1959
12
-14-
81
6-1
1-8
2
12-1
4-81
GSA
No.
P
-5,
Ente
rprise
No.
3.
C
asi
ng
: 24
In
fr
om su
rface
to
40
5 ft
; 10
In
fr
om
347
to 4
10
ft,
430
to 4
82 ft,
502
to 5
15 ft
, 53
5 to
680
ft
, an
d 70
0 to
74
5 ft;
10
in
scre
en
from
410
to
43
0 ft
, 48
2 to
50
2 ft
, 51
5 to
53
5 ft,
680
to
700
ft,
and
745
to 7
65
ft.
Rep
orte
d dr
awdo
wn
94 ft
after
8 h
rs
pum
p-
Ing
752
gpm
In
19
59.
GSA
No.
P
-3,
Ente
rprise
No.
2.
C
asin
g:
12
In
from
su
rface
to
425
ft;
none
be
low
. R
epor
ted
draw
dow
n 75
ft
a
fte
r 8
hrs
pum
ping
60
0 gp
m
In
1934
.
62
3119
3008
5533
401
City o
f E
nte
rprise
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
8186
024
, 16
,10
Tc,
Kp
406
272
269.
427
4.5
273.
2
10-0
1-81
4-2
2-8
2
7-0
1-8
211
-11-
82
Ente
rprise
No.
8.
Cas
ing:
24
In
fr
om sur
fa
ce to
630
ft;
16
in
from
57
0 to
63
5 ft;
10
in
from
765
to
79
5 ft;
10
In
scre
en
from
635
to
76
5 ft
an
d 79
5 to
860
ft
. R
epor
ted
draw
dow
n 97
ft
a
fte
r 4
hrs
pu
mp-
In
g 75
4 gp
m o
n 10
-01-
81.
Table
1.
R
ecor
ds o
f w
ells
In
th
e
Fo
rt R
ucke
r a
rea
Co
ntin
ue
d
Well
No. 63 64
Well
lo
cati
on(WATSTORE
No.
) Owner
3116
3508
5525
001
Mead
ow! aw
n Cemetery
3120
3308
5461
601
Mace
doni
a Community
Wate
r Sy
stem
Dlam
e-
Alti
tude
Water
Year
Depth
ter
of
Water-
of la
nd
Above
(+)
orco
m-
of well
well
bear
ing
surf
ace
belo
w land
Dril
ler
pleted
(ft)
(I
nche
s)
unit
(ft)
surf
ace
(ft)
Burr
ell
Dril
ling
1956
774
6 ..
. 35
5Co.
Layn
e-Ce
ntra
1 Co.
1981
710
12,
6 Tc
, Kp
363
216
218
leve
l Date
of
Meth
odmeasurement
of li
ft
....
T
11-2
4-81
T
2-03
-82
t
Use
ofwa
ter
Rema
rks
1 GS
A No
. P-6.
Electric logs available
In f
iles o
f USGS.
P Macedonia
No.
1. Casing
12 In
fr
om s
urfa
ce t
o
65
3120
0508
5435
601
Fo
rt R
ucke
r M
ilita
ry
Re
serv
atio
nLayn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
4262
0 18
, 10
Ttu
, T
nf,
Tc,
Kp
202.
6469 10
4.1
73.2
9-01
-81
11-2
0-81
6
-28
-82
495
ft;
6 In
fr
om 4
35 to
50
0 ft,
515
to
535
ft
and
620
to 6
36 ft;
6 In
sc
reen
fr
om
500
to
515
ft,
535
to
620
ft,
636
to 6
41 ft
and
66
5 to
710
ft
. R
epor
ted
draw
dow
n 10
9 ft
after
pum
ping
45
7 gp
m
on
11-2
4-81
.
M GS
A N
o.
M-2
, F
ort
Ruc
ker
No.
1.
C
asi
ng:
18
In
from
su
rface
to
14
8 ft;
10
In
from
10
5 to
15
3 ft
, 17
3 to
17
9 ft
, 21
9 to
33
5 ft,
340
to 4
98
ft,
508
to
513
ft,
528
to
536
ft,
and
551
to
610
ft;
10
In
scre
en
from
15
3 to
17
3 ft
, 17
9 to
21
9 ft
, 33
5 to
34
0 ft
, 49
8 to
50
8 ft,
513
to
528
ft,
536
to
551
ft
and
610
to
620
ft.
Re
p
ort
ed
dr
awdo
wn
58 ft
a
fte
r 21
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
335.
24 g
pm o
n 9
-01
-81
.
Table
1.
R
ecor
ds o
f w
ells
In
th
e
Fort
Ruc
ker
are
a C
on
tinu
ed
Well
No.
Melt location
(MAT
STOR
E No
. )
Owne
r
Year
com-
Orlller
pleted
Depth
of wall
(ft)
Diam
ete
r of
wall
(Inches)
Wate
rbe
arin
gunit
Alti
tude
of land
surface
(ft)
Water
Above
(+)
orbe
low
land
surf
ace
(ft)
level Date
of
meas
urem
ent
Meth
odof li
ftUse
ofwa
ter
Remarks
6631
2003
0854
3240
1Fort Rucker
Mili
tary
Reservation
layne-Central
Co.
1942
649
18,
10Tt
u, T
nf,
Kp226.4
35 69 98 103.7
99.1
4-07
-42
7-04
-52
9-01
-81
11-20-81
6-28-82
GSA
No.
M-3, Fort R
ucke
r No.
2. Ca
sing
: 18 In
fr
om su
rfac
e to 168
ft;
10 In
from 120
to 173
ft,
193 to
203 ft,
223
to 2
33 ft,
253
to 309
ft,
324
to 5
28 ft,
543
to 5
49 ft
and
564
to 6
39
ft;
10 In screen from
173 to 193
ft,
203
to
223
ft,
233
to 2
53 ft,
309
to 3
24 ft,
528
to
543
ft,
549
to 564
ft
and
634
to 6
49 f
t.
Reported dr
awdo
wn 80.5
ft a
fter 36 hrs
pumping
810 gpm
4-07-42. Report
ed d
rawd
own
50.8 ft
after
8 hrs
pump
ing
750
gpm
4-07-52. Re
port
ed
drawdown 26 ft
after
16
hrs
pumping
324.13 gpm
9-01
-81.
Table
1.
R
ecor
ds o
f w
ells
In
th
e
Fo
rt
Ruc
ker
are
a C
on
tinu
ed
Well
No.
Well lo
cati
on(W
ATST
ORE
No.)
Owner
Year
com-
Drll
ler
plet
ed
Dept
hof
well
(ft)
Diame
ter
ofwell
(Inc
hes)
Water-
bear 1 ng
unit
Altitude
of land
surface
(ft)
Water
Above
(+)
orbelow
land
surface
(ft)
level Date
of
measurement
Method
of li
ftUse
ofwa
ter
Remarks
6731
2008
0854
3100
1F
ort
Ruc
ker
Mlllta
ry
Rese
rvatI o
nL
ayn
e-C
en
tra
I C
o.
1942
673
18,
10T
tu,
Tnf,
Kp25
2.4
58 129
150.
112
4.9
5-01
-42
9-01
-81
12-0
1-81
6-2
8-8
2
M GS
A N
o.
M-5
, F
ort
Ruc
ker
No.
3.
C
AsI
ng:
18
In
from
su
rfa
ce t
o
202
ft;
10
In
from
15
1 to
20
7 ft
, 25
7 to
273
ft,
28
3 to
55
2 ft,
567
to
571
ft,
586
to 6
15 ft
, an
d 63
0 to
663
ft;
10
in
scre
en
from
20
7 to
25
7 ft
, 27
3 to
28
3 ft,
552
to 5
67 ft,
571
to
586
ft,
615
to 6
30 ft,
and
663
to 6
73 ft.
Rep
orte
d dr
awdo
wn
47 ft
after
37.5
hr
s pu
mpi
ng
805
gpm
5-0
1-4
2.
Rep
orte
d dra
w
dow
n 19
ft
a
fte
r 13
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
271.
71
gpm
9
-01
-81
.
6831
1956
0854
3190
1F
ort
Ruc
ker
Ml I
Ita
ry
Rese
rvatIon
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
4267
018
, 10
Ttu
, T
nf,
Kp25
0.7
60 101.
711
712
3.2
1942
7
-16
-65
7
-16
-77
12-0
4-81
0 GS
A N
o.
M-4
, F
ort
R
ucke
r N
o.
5.
Cas
ing:
18
in
fr
om
surf
ace
to
20
1 ft;
10
In
from
16
2 to
21
6 ft
, 27
6 to
55
2 ft,
567
to
588
ft,
and
618
to
660
ft;
10
in
scre
en
from
21
6 to
27
6 ft,
552
to
567
ft,
588
to 6
18
ft,
and
660
to
670
ft.
Rep
orte
d dr
awdo
wn
33 ft
after
48
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
459
gpm
7
-16
-77
.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
wells
In
th
e
Fort
R
uck
er
are
a C
ontinued
Well
No.
Well
loca
tio
n(W
ATST
OR
E N
o.)
O
wne
r
Yea
rco
m-
Orlller
ple
ted
De
pth
of
well
(ft)
Dia
me
ter
of
well
(In
ch
es)
Wate
r
bearing
unit
Altitu
de
of
land
surf
ace
(ft)
Wa
ter
Abo
ve
(+)
or
belo
w
land
su
rfa
ce
(f
t)
leve
l
Da
te of
mea
sure
men
tM
etho
dof
lift
Use
of
wate
rR
emar
ks
6931
2009
0854
2580
1F
ort
R
uck
er
Ml IIta
ry
Re
se
rva
tio
nL
ayn
e-C
en
tra
I C
o.
1942
689
18,
10T
tu,
Tnf,
Kp26
5.83
74 104
160.0
4-0
7-4
2
7-0
4-5
2
12-0
1-8
1
M G
SA
No.
6
, F
ort
R
uck
er
No.
4.
Casi
ng:
18
In
fro
m surf
ace to
21
8 ft;
10
In
fro
m
164
to
219
ft,
239
to
247
ft,
267
to
275
ft,
295
to
566
ft,
581
to
586
ft,
and
616
to
679
ft;
10
In
scre
en
fro
m
219
to
239
ft,
247
to
267
ft,
275
to
295
ft,
566
to
581
ft,
586
to
616
ft
and
679
to
689
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 18
ft after
7 h
rs
pum
ping
3
79
.52
gpm
9-0
1-8
1.
70
3120
1908
5425
501
Fo
rt R
uck
er
Military
R
ese
rva
tio
nL
ayn
e-C
en
tra
I C
o.
1982
807
18,
10
Kp30
217
7174.4
175.3
3-1
0-8
2
3-1
5-8
2
6-2
8-8
2
M F
ort
Ru
cke
r N
o.
9.
Ca
sin
g:
18
In
from
sur
fa
ce to
58
5 ft;
10
In
from
52
5 to
59
0 ft
, 67
0 to
69
0 ft,
and
720
to
772
ft;
10
In
scre
en
590
to
670
ft,
690
to
720
ft,
and
772
to
807
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 44
ft
aft
er
pum
ping
50
3 gp
m
In
1982
. E
lectr
ic
log
s a
va
llab
le
In
the fIle
s
of
US
6S.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
In
the
Fort
R
uck
er
are
a C
ontinued
Well
No.
Well
lo
cati
on(WATSTORE
No.)
Owner
Year
com-
Dril
ler
pleted
Depth
of well
(ft)
Diame
ter
ofwe
ll( I
nches)
Water
bearing
unit
Altitude
of land
surface
(ft)
Water
Above
(+)
orbelow
land
surface
(ft)
level Date o
fme
asur
emen
tMe
thod
of li
ftUse
ofwater
Remarks
7131
1932
0854
3180
1F
ort
Ruck
er
Ml
I Ita
ry
Rese
rvatIon
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
4275
118
, 10
Ttu
, T
nf,
Tc,
Kp
355
163
230
272.
323
1.0
1942
9-0
1-8
1
11-1
9-81
6-2
8-8
2
72
3119
1808
5442
401
Fo
rt
Ru
cke
r M
ilita
ry
Re
serv
atio
nLayn
e-C
entr
a I
Co.
19
8276
0 18
, 10
T
c,
Kp
235
108
108.6
106.
9
12-1
8-8
1
7-0
2-8
2
11-1
5-8
2
M G
SA
No.
M
-8,
Fo
rt R
uck
er
No.
6
. C
asi
ng:
18
In
from
su
rfa
ce
to
33
0 ft;
10
in
from
28
1 to
25
7 ft,
387
to 4
06 ft
, 41
6
to
511
ft,
531
to 6
73
ft,
683
to
695
ft,
715
to
731
ft
and
751
to
765
ft;
10
in
scre
en
from
35
7 to
3
87
, 40
6 to
41
6 ft
, 51
1 to
53
1 ft,
673
to 6
83 ft
, 69
5 to
71
5 ft,
and
731
to
751
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 10
ft
a
fte
r pu
mpi
ng
200
gpm
in
19
42.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 41
ft
after
7 hrs
pu
mp
in
g
78
gpm
9-0
1-8
1.
M F
ort
R
uck
er
No.
8
.Ca
sing
: 18 in
from sur
face
to 535
ft;
10 in
from 475
to 5
40 ft,
620
to 6
50 ft,
660
to 7
10
ft,
and
720
to 7
30 ft;
10 in sc
reen
from 5
40 t
o 620
ft,
650
to 6
60 ft,
710
to 7
20 ft a
nd 730
to
760
ft.
Reported draw
down 45
ft a
fter pumping
503 gpm
12-1
8-81
. Electric logs av
aila
ble
In t
he flles
of USGS.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
In th
e
Fort
R
uck
er
are
a C
ontinued
Ne
llN
o. 73 74
D la
me-
Yea
r D
epth
te
r o
f W
ate
r-W
ell
location
com
- of
well
we
ll b
ea
rin
g(W
ATST
OR
E N
o.)
O
wne
r D
riller
ple
ted
(ft)
(I
nch
es)
unit
3118
0408
5463
001
Tow
n o
f L
eve
l P
lain
s
Art
esia
n
Well
Co.
19
69
...
...
Tc
3118
0408
5432
201
Tow
n of
Dale
vl 1
le
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
al
Co.
19
66
707
16
,8
Tnf,
Tc,
Kp
Altitu
de
of
1 and
su
rfa
ce
(ft) 318
325
Wa
ter
Abo
ve
(+)
or
belo
w
land
surf
ace (f
t)
174.9
24
3.0
20
2.9
178
20
3.9
20
6.0
leve
l
Da
te o
f M
etho
dm
easu
rem
ent
of
lift
10-0
7-6
9
S12
-15-
8111-1
7-8
2
7-1
5-6
6
T12-1
5-8
1
6-3
0-8
2
Use
o
f
wate
r R
emar
ks
P Leve
l P
lain
s
No.
1
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 78.7
9ft
a
fte
r 24
h
rs
pum
ping
82
gpm
on
1
0-0
7-6
9.
P D
ale
vi lie
N
o.
2.
Casi
ng:
16
In
fro
m su
rfa
ce
to
350
ft;
8 In
fr
om
30
0 to
75
3118
3808
5423
901
Tow
n o
f D
ale
vl lie
L
ayn
e-C
en
tra
l C
o.
1961
700
18,
8 T
tu,
Tn
f,
333
Tc,
K
p176.7
217.3
7-1
7-6
5
12-1
4-8
1
355
ft,
395
to
470
ft,
480
to
550
ft,
and
590
to 6
57 ft
; 8
In
scre
en
from
35
5 to
39
5 ft,
470
to
480
ft,
550
to
590
ft,
and
657
to
707
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 39
ft
after
6 h
rs
pum
ping
50
3 gp
m 7-1
5-6
6.
GSA
N
o.
M-1
1,
Da le
v!lie
N
o.
1.
Casi
ng:
18
in
from
su
rfa
ce
to
35
0 ft
; 8
In
fro
m
300
to
355
ft,
375
to
464
ft,
474
to
580
ft,
590
to
620
ft,
630
to
640
ft,
and
680
to
690
ft;
8 In
sc
reen
from
35
5 to
3
75
, 46
4 to
474
ft,
580
to
590
ft,
620
to
630
ft,
640
to
680
ft
and
690
to
700
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n
37.4
ft
after
15 m
lns
pim
pin
g
460
gpm
7-1
7-6
5.
Table
1.
R
ecor
ds o
f w
ells
In
th
e
Fort
Ruc
ker
are
a C
ontin
ued
Well
No.
Well location
(WATSTORE
No.)
Owner
Driller
Year
Depth
com-
of we 11
pleted
(ft)
Diam
e
ter
ofwell
(Inc
hes)
Wate
r
bear
ing
unit
Altitude ________
of land
Above
(+)
or
surface
below
land
(ft)
surf
ace
(ft)
Water
leve
l Date
of
meas
urem
ent
Met
hod
of
iift
Use
of
wat
erR
emar
ks
7631
1720
0854
2590
1F
ort
Ruc
ker
Ml Iita
ry
Rese
rvatI o
nLayn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
8194
0 18
, 10
K
p,
Kr
309
188
179.
218
1.9
77
3117
0308
5470
201
Tow
n of
Leve
l P
lain
s
Wel
don
Drillin
g
1980
Co.
78
312117085373701
Fort
pucker
Ml IItary
Smith
Well
and
Reservation
Supp
ly C
o.19
75
440
296
Ttu,
Tnf
341
8, 4
Tnf
231
204
224 65 86 81 85.4
11-01-81
6-29-82
11-15-82
6-03
-81
12-15-81
4-26-75
12-01-81
6-29-82
11-16-82
M Cairns A
irfield.
Casing:
18 in
from sur
face t
o 840
ft;
10 In
from 8
00 to 8
45 ft,
and
880
to 9
10 ft;
10 in
screen from 8
45 t
o 880
ft a
nd 910
to 9
40 ft.
Repo
rted
dr
awdo
wn 90 ft
after
25 hrs
pumping
754 gpm
11-01-81.
Elec
tric
lo
gs av
aila
ble
In the
file
s of US
GS.
P Le
vel
Plains N
o. 2.
Reported dr
awdo
wn 30 ft
after
29 hrs
pumping
150
gpm
6-03-81.
M Hatch
Fiel
d.Ca
sing
: 8
in from sur
face to 2
70 ft;
4 in
from 2
55 t
o 276
ft;
4 In
screen from 2
76 to
296
ft.
Repo
rted
dr
awdo
wn
29 f
t after
36 hrs
pump-
Ing
50 g
pm 4
-26-75.
Table
1.
R
ecor
ds o
f w
ells
In
th
e
Fort
Ruc
ker
are
a C
ontin
ued
Well
No.
Well
lo
cati
on(WATSTORE
No.)
Owner
Year
com-
Drl
1 ler
pleted
Depth
of well
(ft)
Diam
ete
r of
well
( Inc
hes)
Wate
r-be
ar 1 ng
unit
Alti
tude
of
1 and
surf
ace
(ft)
Water
Above
(+)
orbe
low
land
surf
ace
(ft)
leve
l Date
of
meas
urem
ent
Meth
odof
li
ftUse
ofwater
Remarks
7931
2006
0854
1060
1F
ort
Ruc
ker
Ml I
Ita
ry
Re
serv
atI
on
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
8278
018
, 10
T
c,
Kp30
016
716
7.9
170.
0
4-3
0-8
2
7-0
2-8
2
11-1
5-82
M F
ort
R
ucke
r N
o.
10.
Casi
ng:
18
In
from
sur
fa
ce to
55
5 ft
; 10
In
fr
om 4
95 to
560
ft,
640
to 6
54 ft
, an
d 68
4 to
75
0 ft;
10
In
scre
en
from
56
0 to
640
ft,
654
to 6
84 ft
an
d 75
0 to
780
ft.
Rep
orte
d dr
awdo
wn
51 ft
a
fte
r pu
mpi
ng
503
gpm
4-0
3-8
2.
Ele
ctr
ic
logs
a
val(a
ble
In
th
e flle
s
of
USG
S.
8031
1949
0853
5480
1 To
wn
of
New
ton
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
5969
5 12
, 6
Kp32
514
715
6.9
1959
7-
20-6
5
8131
1917
0853
5350
1 To
wn
of
New
ton
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
7872
018
, 8
Tc,
Kp
351
226
269.
1
6-1
9-7
8
12-0
9-81
GSA
No.
N
-3,
New
ton
No.
1.
C
asi
ng:
12
In
from
su
rfa
ce to
608
ft
; 6
In
from
55
8 to
623
ft,
633
to 6
48 ft
an
d 65
8 to
685
ft
; 6
In
scre
en
from
623
to
633
ft,
648
to 6
58 ft
an
d 68
5 to
695
ft.
Re
p
ort
ed
dr
awdo
wn
45 ft
w
hen
pum
ped
at
254
gpm
In
19
59.
New
ton
No.
2.
C
asi
ng
: 18
In
fr
om su
rfa
ce to
53
0 ft;
8 In
fr
om 4
80 t
o
535
ft,
555
to 5
80 ft,
620
to 6
56 ft
and
68
6 to
71
0 ft;
8 In
sc
reen
fr
om
535
to
555
ft,
580
to
620
ft,
656
to 6
86 ft
an
d 71
0 to
720
ft
. R
e
po
rte
d
draw
dow
n 11
6 ft
after
24
hrs
pum
ping
53
0 gp
m 6
-19
-78
.
Table
1.
Records
of wells
In th
e Fort R
ucker
area
Con
tinu
ed
Well
No.
Well location
(WATSTORE
No.)
Ow
ner
Year
com-
Drll
ler
pleted
Depth
of well
(ft)
Diam
eter
ofwell
(Inches)
Water
bear
ing
unit
Alti
tude
of land
surface
(ft)
Water
Abov
e (+)
orbe
low
land
surface
(ft)
leve
l Date
of
meas
urem
ent
Meth
odof lift
Use
ofwa
ter
Remarks
82
311724085385301
W. A.
Do
sset
t
83
3119
1408
5291
501
Midl
and
City
Carr
ol 1
Hard
ware
1963
Ozar
k, Ala.
355
Ttu
310
Layn
e-C
entr
a1
Co.
19
60
752
12,
6 T
c,
Kp
390
183.
518
4.9
203
263.
627
5.9
10-0
4-8
211-1
7-8
2
1960
12-0
1-8
111-1
7-8
2
84
3119
0808
5293
701
Mid
lan
d C
ity
Layn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
45547.6
7
12,
6 T
nf,
Tc
375.5
188
1945
D C
asi
ng
: 4
In
fro
m sur
fa
ce to
18
0 ft
; no
ne
be
low
.
P G
SA
No.
0-4
, M
idla
nd
City
No.
2
. C
asi
ng
: 12
in
fr
om
su
rfa
ce
to
65
0 ft;
6 In
fr
om
57
0 to
65
5 ft
, 66
5 to
67
1 ft,
681
to 6
90 ft,
and
705
to
737
ft;
6 In
sc
ree
n
from
65
5 to
66
5 ft,
671
to
681
ft,
690
to
705
ft
and
737
to
752
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 2.2
ft
w
hen
pum
ped
at
49
gpm
In
19
60.
P G
SA
No.
0
-7,
Mid
land
City
No.
1.
C
asi
ng
: 12
In
fr
om
su
rfa
ce
to
33
6
ft;
6 in
fr
om
28
9 to
50
6 ft;
6 in
sc
reen
fro
m
506
to
547
ft.
Re
po
rte
d
draw
dow
n 44
ft
after
8
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
80 g
pm
In
1945
.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
In th
e
Fort
R
uck
er
are
a C
on
tin
ue
d
Well
No.
Well
location
(WAT
STORE N
o.)
Owner
Year
com-
Drlller
plet
ed
Dept
hof well
(ft)
Diame
ter
ofwell
(Inc
hes)
Water
bear
ing
unit
Alti
tude
of land
surface
(ft)
Water
Above
(+)
orbe
low
land
surface
(ft)
level Date o
fme
asur
emen
tMe
thod
of li
ftUse
ofwater
Remarks
85
3118
3808
5322
301
Tow
n o
f P
lnck
ard
Layn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
65
755
12,
6 K
p 37
4
86
3119
4508
5240
501
Am
erica
n
Bra
ss
Inc.
87
3119
3408
5241
701
Am
erica
n
Bra
ss
Inc.
347
Layn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
65
183
6,
4 T
t 35
3
88
3119
2008
5241
801
Am
erica
n
Bra
ss
Inc.
89
3118
5108
5273
001
City
of
Dot
han
90
3118
5008
5274
301
City of
Dot
han
355
Layn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
42
678
18
Tc,
Kp
375
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
43
672
18,
8 T
c 35
7
210
262.6
26
6.0
26
2.6
223.2
239.2
15.3
170
254
172
250
24
7.2
254.
3
7-2
7-6
5
12-0
9-81
6-2
9-8
2
11-1
7-8
2
2-0
4-8
2
11-1
7-8
2
4-1
9-6
5
1942
2-0
1-8
2
1943
1
-26
-82
6-3
0-8
211-1
9-8
2
P G
SA
No.
0-1
2,
Pln
ckard
C
ity
No.
2.
Casi
ng:
12
In
fro
m
surf
ace to
70
0 ft;
6 In
fr
om
64
5 to
70
5 ft;
6
In
scre
en
fro
m 7
05
to
755
ft.
Re
po
rte
d
draw
dow
n 28
ft a
fte
r 3
.2
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
100
gpm
7-2
7-6
5.
Irr
Am
erica
n
Bra
ss
No.
2.
Ind
G
SA
No.
W
-3,
Am
erica
n
Bra
ss
No.
1.
C
asi
ng
: 6
In
from
surf
ace to
16
3
ft;
4 In
sc
ree
n
fro
m
163
to
183
ft.
Report
edly
pu
mpe
d 30
gp
m
In
1965
.
Ind
Am
erica
n
Bra
ss
No.
3.
P G
SA
No.
P
-6,
Dot
han
No.
2.
Re
po
rte
d
draw
dow
n 31
ft
a
fte
r pu
mpi
ng
550
gpm
In
19
42.
P G
SA
No.
P
-7,
Dot
han
No.
4.
Ca
sin
g:
18
In
from
su
rfa
ce
to
49
2 ft;
8 In
fr
om
42
5 to
57
0 ft;
8 In
sc
ree
n
fro
m
570
to
670
ft.
Re
po
rte
d
draw
dow
n 41.5
ft
after
24
hrs
pum
ping
55
0 gp
m
In
1943
.
Table
1.
Records
of wells
In t
he Fort R
ucker
area
Con
tinu
ed
Well
Well
location
No.
(WATSTORE
No.)
Owner
Driller
Year
com
pleted
Depth
of well
(ft)
Diam
e
ter
ofwell
(Inc
hes)
Wate
r
bearing
unit
Alti
tude
_________
of land
Abov
e (+)
or
surface
below
land
(ft)
surface
(ft)
Wa
ter
level
Da
te
of
mea
sure
men
t
Met
hod
of
lift
Use
o
f
wate
rR
emar
ks
91
3116
5808
5271
001
City of
Doth
an
Layn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
74
860
18,
10
Kp
327.
218
4
233.
521
9.2
4-21
-76
1-27
-82
6-30
-82
Do
tha
n
No.
23.
Casi
ng:
18
In
fro
m sur
fa
ce to
71
0 ft
; 10
In
fr
om
61
0 to
715
ft
, an
d 76
0 to
79
0 ft;
10
In
scre
en
715
to
760
ft
and
790
to
860
ft.
Re
po
rte
d
draw
dow
n 15
ft
a
fte
r 8
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
1001
gp
m
4-2
1-7
6.
Ele
ctr
ic
log
s a
va
ilab
le
In th
e file
s
of
USG
S.
92
3116
4708
5265
501
City
of
Do
tha
nL
ayne
-Cen
traI
C
o.
1973
838
18,
10
Kp33
9.29
190
228
1-2
7-8
2
93
3116
2308
5232
401
City
of
Doth
an
Layn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
82
1105
18
, 10
K
p,
Kr
302
192
194
195
9-10
-81
2-09-82
4-14-82
Dothan No.
22.
Casi
ng:
18 In from su
rfac
e to
734
ft;
10 in
fr
om 6
54
to 7
39 ft
and
779 to 7
93
ft;
10 In
screen from
739
to 7
79 ft a
nd 793
to
838
ft.
Reported draw
down
16 ft
af
ter
pump
ing
744
gpm.
Dothan No.
26.
Casi
ng:
18 in
from surface
to
735
ft;
10 In
fr
om 6
55
to 740 ft,
760
to 8
20
ft,
840
to 8
60 f
t, and
960
to 1050 ft;
10 in
sc
reen
from 7
40 t
o 760
ft,
820
to 8
40 ft,
860
to 9
60 ft and
1050 t
o 1080 ft.
Reported draw
down
67
ft
after
pumping
851
gpm
9-10-81. Re
ported dr
awdo
wn 6
5 ft
after
25.5 hrs
pump
ing
802 gpm
2-09-82.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
wells
In
th
e
Fo
rt R
uck
er
are
a C
on
tin
ue
d
We
ll W
ell
loca
tio
n
No.
(W
ATST
OR
E N
o.)
Ow
ner
Drille
r
Dla
me-
Altitu
de
__
__
__
__
_
Yea
r D
epth
te
r o
f W
ate
r-
of
land
Abo
ve
(+)
or
com
- of
well
we
ll b
ea
rin
g
su
rfa
ce
belo
w
land
ple
ted
(f
t)
(In
ch
es)
unit
(ft)
surf
ace (f
t)
Wa
ter
level
Da
te of
mea
sure
men
tM
etho
d of
lift
Use
of
wa
ter
Rem
arks
94
3121
0808
5204
301
City o
f H
ea
dla
nd
Layn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
4665
916
, 8
Tc,
K
p38
119
1255.8
95
3120
3708
5202
001
City o
f H
eadla
nd
Layn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
6469
716
, 8
Tc,
K
p37
318
521
922
4
96
3113
2508
5215
701
City o
f D
otha
nLayn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
5672
018
, 8
Ttu
, T
nf
30
4.7
150
277
281.7
5-2
1-6
4
2-0
4-8
2
6-27
-64
2-04
-82
6-29
-82
12-1
8-5
6
1-2
7-8
2
6-3
0-8
2
GSA
N
o.
X-1
, H
ea
dla
nd
N
o.
1.
Ca
sin
g:
16
In
from
surf
ace to
36
0 ft;
8 In
fr
om
32
0 to
59
0 ft
an
d 61
0 to
64
4 ft
; 8
In
scre
en
fr
om
59
0 to
61
0
ft
and
644
to
659
ft.
Re
po
rte
d
draw
dow
n 24
ft
after
1 hr
pum
ping
33
6 gp
m 5-2
1-6
4.
GSA
N
o.
X-2
, H
ea
dla
nd
N
o.
2.
Ca
sin
g:
16
In
from
su
rfa
ce
to
54
0 ft;
8 In
fr
om
48
0 to
60
0 ft
, 62
0 to
657
ft,
and
677
to 6
87 ft;
8 In
sc
reen
from
60
0 to
62
0 ft
, 65
7 to
677
ft
and
687
to
697
ft.
Re
po
rte
d
draw
dow
n 28
ft after
8 hrs
pu
mp-
In
g 50
8 gp
m 6-2
7-6
4.
Ele
ctr
ic
log
s a
va
ilab
le
In
the
file
s
of
USG
S.
GSA
N
o.
J-3
, D
otha
n N
o.
13.
Ca
sin
g:
18
In
from
surf
ace to
57
5 ft
; 8
In
from
49
5 to
58
0 ft
; 8
In
scre
en
from
58
0 to
72
0 ft
. R
eport
ed
dra
w
dow
n 73
ft
a
fte
r 8
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
530
gpm
1
2-1
8-5
6.
Ta
ble
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
In th
e
Fo
rt
Ru
cke
r are
a C
ontinued
We
llN
o. 97
Well
location
(WAT
STO
RE
No
.)
Ow
ner
3111
2908
5222
901
City of
Dot
han
Yea
rco
m-
Drllle
r ple
ted
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
a 1
Co.
19
61
Dep
thof
we
ll(f
t) 804
Dia
me
ter
of
well
(In
ch
es)
18,
8
Wate
rbearing
un
it
Ttu
, T
nf
Altitude
of
land
surf
ace
(ft) 34
2.3
3
Wa
ter
Abo
ve
(+)
or
belo
w
land
su
rfa
ce
(f
t)
205
313
level
Da
te o
fm
easu
rem
ent
1961 2-0
3-8
2
Met
hod
Use
of
of
lift
w
ate
r R
emar
ks
T P
GSA
N
o.
J-6
, D
otha
n N
o.15
. C
asi
ng
: 18
in
fr
om
98
3115
2308
5235
601
City of
Dot
han
Layn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
6171
418
, 8
Ttu
, T
nf,
Tc
327.
8219
329
5
4-1
9-6
1
1-2
6-8
2
99
3116
1608
5251
001
City o
f D
otha
nLayn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
7997
52
4,
10
Kp,
K
r34
923
424
019
80
1-2
8-8
2
100
3115
3008
5260
001
City of
Dot
han
Layn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
7171
518
, 10
T
nf,
Tc
280.
1917
12
22
.5
2-1
5-7
3
1-2
6-8
2
su
rfa
ce
to
70
0 ft;
8 In
fr
om
62
0 to
70
4 ft;
8 In
sc
ree
n
fro
m
704
to
804
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 13
6 ft a
fte
r 8
hrs
pu
mp
ing
699
gpm
In
19
61.
GSA
N
o.
1-1
, D
oth
an
N
o.
15.
Casi
ng:
18
in
from
surf
ace to
53
4 ft;
8 In
fr
om
45
4 to
53
9 ft
an
d
589
to
664
ft;
8 in
sc
ree
n
fro
m
539
to
589
ft
and
664
to 7
14 ft
.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 16
2 ft
a
fte
r 8
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
708
gpm
9
-19
-61
.
Dot
han
No.
2
4.
Casi
ng:
24
in
from
su
rfa
ce
to
83
0 ft;
10
In
fro
m
750
to
835
ft;
10
in
scre
en
from
83
5 to
97
5 ft
. R
ep
ort
ed
dr
awdo
wn
13 ft
after
12
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
805
gpm
In
19
80.
Do
tha
n
No.
19
. C
asi
ng:
18
in
from
surf
ace to
55
5 ft
; 10
in
fr
om
4
93
to
56
0 ft
and
620
to
675
ft;
10
in
scre
en
fr
om
560
to
620
ft
and
675
to
715
ft.
Report
ed
dra
w
dow
n 16
7 ft after
pum
p-
Ing
602
gpm
2
-15
-73
.
Table
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
In th
e
Fort
R
uck
er
are
a C
on
tin
ue
d
Well
No.
101
Well location
(WAT
STORE No.)
Owne
r
3116
0908
5263
801
City
of
Doth
an
Year
com-
Drll
ler
plet
ed
Layne-Central
Co.
1971
Dept
hof
well
(ft) 800
Diame
ter
ofwe
ll(Inches)
18,
10
Water
bear
ing
unit
Tnf, Tc,
Kp
Alti
tude
of la
ndsurface
(ft) 330
Water
Above
(+)
orbe
low
land
surfac
e (ft)
174
227
leve
l Date o
fme
asur
emen
t
2-15-72
1-28
-82
Method
of li
ft
T
Use
ofwater
P
Remarks
Dothan No.
20.
Casing:
18 In
from s
urface t
o
102
3115
5508
5272
401
City o
f D
otha
nLayn
e-C
entr
al
Co.
19
7983
5 18
, 10
Kp
319
200
213
1980
2-0
1-8
2
103
3115
1308
5303
301
City of
Dot
han
Sm
ith
We
ll an
d S
upply
C
o.19
8145
512
, 6
Ttu
, T
nf
210
117
109
10-2
9-81
11-0
4-8
2
540
ft;
10
In
from
48
0 to
54
5 ft,
605
to
630
ft,
and
670
to 7
70 ft
; 8
In
scre
en
fr
om
54
5 to
60
5 ft
, 63
0 to
67
0 ft
and
770
to 8
00 ft.
Re
po
rte
d
draw
dow
n 35
ft
after
pum
ping
80
5 gp
m
2-1
5-7
2.
Dot
han
No.
25.
Casi
ng:
18
In
from
su
rfa
ce
to
73
0 ft;
10
In
fro
m
655
to 7
35 ft;
10
In
scre
en
from
73
5 to
835
ft.
Re
port
ed
draw
dow
n 38
ft
a
fte
r 12
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
850
gpm
In
19
80.
Little
Ch
oct
aw
ha
tch
ee
W
aste
Tre
atm
en
t F
aclIIt
y
Ca
sin
g:
12
In
from
su
r
face
to
29
0 ft;
6 In
fr
om
24
0 to
29
5 ft
an
d 31
5 to
40
5 ft
; 6
In
scre
en
fr
om
29
5 to
31
5 ft
and
405
to
455
ft.
Re
po
rte
d
draw
dow
n 33
ft
after
24
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
226
gpm
1
0-2
9-8
1.
Table
1.
Records
of wells
In the
Fort R
ucke
r ar
ea C
onti
nued
Well
No.
104
Well lo
cati
on(W
ATST
ORE
No.)
Owner
311420085230401
City
of
Dothan
Driller
Smit
h Well and
Supply C
o.
Year
Dept
hco
m-
of we 1
1pl
eted
(ft)
1966
72
5
D 1 ame
-ter
ofwell
( Inc
hes)
18,
8
Wate
rbe
arin
gunit
Ttu, T
nf,
Tc
Alti
tude
of land
surf
ace
(ft) 310.79
Wate
rAbove
(+)
orbelow
land
surface
(ft)
206
278
leve
l Date
of
Method
meas
urem
ent
of li
ft
8-01
-66
T2-01-82
Use
ofwater
Remarks
P Do
than
No. 17.
Casing:
18 In from su
rfac
e to
105
311349085235901
City
of
Dothan
Smit
h Well and
Supp
ly C
o.19
4678
618,
8 Ttu, Tn
f,
320.25
157
302
6-08
-46
1-27
-82
106
311355085241601
City o
f Dothan
Smith
Well and
Supp
ly C
o.1953
820
18,
8Ttu, Tnf,
Tc355.54
223
330
3-04-54
1-28
-82
555
ft;
8 In from 5
00 f
t to 5
60 ft a
nd 620
to 7
25
ft;
8 In sc
reen
from 560
to 6
20 ft and
725
to 7
65
ft.
Reported dr
awdo
wn
110
ft after
pumping
640 gpm
8-01-66.
GSA
No.
1-2, Dothan N
o.
9. Ca
sing
: 18 In
from
surface
to 556
ft;
8 In
from 4
76 t
o 571
ft,
581
to 6
01 ft
and
651
to 7
51
ft;
8 In
sc
reen
from 571
to 5
81 ft,
601
to 6
51 ft
and
751
to 7
86 ft.
Re
ported dr
awdo
wn 20 ft
afte
r 8
hrs
pumping
258
gpm
6-08-46.
GSA
No.
1-3, Dothan N
o.
12.
Casi
ng:
18 In
from
surf
ace
to 6
05 ft;
8 In
from 5
25 to 6
10 ft
and
670
to 7
80 ft;
8 In
screen from 6
10 t
o 670
ft a
nd 780 to 820 ft.
Reported dr
awdo
wn 56
ft
afte
r 8
hrs
pump
ing
510
gpm
3-04-54.
Table
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
In
the
F
ort
R
uck
er
are
a C
on
tin
ue
d
We
I I
We
I I
loca
tio
n
No.
(W
ATST
OR
E N
o.)
Ow
ner
Drille
r
Yea
r co
m
ple
ted
De
pth
of
we I
I(f
t)
Dia
me
ter
of
well
(Inches)
Altitu
de
_
Wate
r-
of
land
Abo
ve
(+)
or
bearing
su
rfa
ce
be
low
la
nd
un
it
(ft)
surf
ace (f
t)
Wa
ter
level
Da
te of
mea
sure
men
tM
etho
d of
lift
Use
of
wate
rR
emar
ks
107
3114
0408
5290
101
T.
H.
Wh
ltfie
ldR
. W
. W
lIlia
ms
6007
270
108
3113
3008
5245
901
City o
f D
oth
an
Layn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
5175
418
, 8
Ttu
, T
nf,
295.6
T
c15
026
426
7
12-1
8-5
6
1-2
6-8
2
7-0
1-8
2
GSA
N
o.
1-4
. O
il T
est
Wel
l 4
26
. D
ata
us
ed fo
r geolo
gic
an
d h
ydro
Io
gle
co
ntr
ol.
Ele
ctr
ic
log
In
file
s
of
USG
S.
GSA
N
o.
1-6
, D
oth
an
N
o.
10.
Casi
ng:
18
In
from
surf
ace to
55
8 ft;
8 tn
fr
om
47
8 to
56
3 ft,
568
to
580
ft,
600
to
635
ft,
and
660
to
714
ft;
8 In
sc
ree
n
from
56
3 to
56
8 ft,
580
to
600
ft,
635
to
660
ft
and
714
to
754
ft.
Report
ed
dra
w
dow
n 73
ft
after
8 h
rs
pum
ping
53
0 gp
m
12
-18
-56
.
109
3113
1408
5235
601
City of
Do
tha
nLayn
e-C
entr
aI
Co.
19
5532
5 16
, 10
T
i,
Tth
322.
0352 36
.6
4-0
1-5
5
1-2
6-8
2G
SA
No.
1
-8,
Do
tha
n
No.
7
. C
asi
ng
: 16
In
fr
om
surf
ace to
13
2 ft;
8 In
fr
om
16
2 to
23
5 ft,
250
to
260
ft,
and
275
to
285
ft;
10
In
scre
en
from
13
2 to
16
2 ft
, 23
5 to
25
0 ft,
260
to
275
ft,
and
285
to
325
ft.
Re
po
rte
d
draw
dow
n 53
ft
after
pum
ping
58
4 ft
4
-01
-55
.
Table
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
in
the
Fo
rt R
uck
er
are
a C
on
tin
ue
d
Wel
lN
o. 110
Well
location
(WAT
STO
RE
No
.)
Ow
ner
3112
3108
5235
101
City
of
Dot
han
Yea
rco
m-
Drlller
ple
ted
Layn
e-C
entr
a I
Co.
19
53
Dep
tho
f w
ell
(ft) 835
Dia
me
ter
of
we
ll(inches)
24
, 18
,8
Wate
r
bearing
unit
Ttu
, T
nf
Tc
Altitude
of
I and
surf
ace
(ft)
, 2
91
.36
Wa
ter
Abo
ve
(+)
or
belo
w
land
surf
ace (f
t)
158
275
level
Da
te o
fm
easu
rem
ent
3-0
4-5
4
1-2
8-8
2
Met
hod
of
lift
T
Use
o
fw
ate
r R
emar
ks
P G
SA
No.
I -
11
, D
otha
n N
o.
11.
Ca
sin
g:
24
in
fro
m
111
3112
1808
5242
301
City
of
Dot
han
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
6380
518
, 8
Ttu
, T
nf,
Tc
282.6
516
3
252
2-2
0-6
4
2-0
1-8
2
112
3111
1508
5235
001
City
of
Dot
han
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
aI
Co.
19
7375
118
, 10
T
tu,
Tn
f 311.1
021
6
271
278
2-1
9-7
3
2-0
2-8
2
7-0
1-8
2
su
rfa
ce
to
95
ft;
18
in
from
95
to
63
0 ft;
8 in
fr
om
55
0 to
63
5 ft
an
d
725
to
805
ft;
8 In
sc
ree
n
fro
m
635
to 7
25
ft,
and
805
to
835
ft.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 18
1 ft a
fte
r 8
hrs
pu
mpi
ng
520
gpm
3
-04
-54
.
GSA
N
o.
1-1
2,
Dot
han
No.
16.
Ca
sin
g:
18
In
from
surf
ace to
59
0 ft;
8 In
fr
om
51
0 to
59
5 ft,
675
to
685
ft;
8 in
sc
ree
n
from
59
5 to
67
5 ft
an
d 78
5 to
80
5 ft
. R
eport
ed
draw
dow
n 78
ft after
1.5
h
rs
pum
ping
56
0 gp
m
2-2
0-6
4.
Ele
ctr
ic
log
s a
va
ilab
le
in
the file
s
of
USG
S.
Dot
han
No.
2
1.
Ca
sin
g:
18
In
from
su
rfa
ce
to
646
ft;
10
In
fro
m
576
to
651
ft;
10
In
scre
en
from
65
1 to
75
1 ft
. R
e
port
ed
draw
dow
n 94
ft
a
fte
r pu
mpi
ng
556
gpm
2-1
9-7
3.
Ele
ctr
ic
log
s
ava
l ta
ble
In
th
e f
i le
s o
f U
SGS.
Table
1.
R
eco
rds
of
we
lls
in
the
Fo
rt
Ru
cke
r are
a C
ontinued
We
ll W
ell
location
No.
(W
ATST
OR
E N
o. )
O
wne
r D
riller
113
3113
3808
5334
401
Fo
rt
Ru
cke
r M
1 1 1
tary
E
mm
ett
Hug
hes
Rese
rvat
i on
Or i
1 1 i
ng
Co.
114
3113
4808
5390
801
Fo
rt
Ru
cke
r M
1 1 1
ta
ry
Sm
ith
We
1 1
and
Re
serv
atio
n
Su
pp
ly
Co.
115
3112
5808
5352
301
Wa
llace
G
race
1 .
D
. G
riffin
116
3115
3808
5532
301
Battens
Cro
ssro
ad
s Fo
y E
nglis
h
117
3114
4508
5502
401
Car
son
Bru
nson
Jo
hn
D.
Hug
hes
and
Son
Dia
me-
A
ltitude
Wa
ter
Yea
r D
epth
te
r of
Wate
r-
of
land
A
bove
(+
) or
com
- o
f w
ell
we
ll bearing
su
rfa
ce
belo
w
land
ple
ted
(ft)
(in
ch
es)
un
it
(ft)
surf
ace (f
t)
....
468
6 T
t,
Ttu
31
9 69.9
70.4
1975
42
3 8
, 4
Ttu
34
9 21
224
02
38
.3
1980
54
0 4
Ttu
, T
nf
278
67
.262.6
1968
81
2 6
Tc
350
183
22
0.0
222.0
22
3.0
1977
65
0 6
Tc
286
168.
4
164.6
leve
l
Da
te of
mea
sure
men
t
12-0
2-8
1
1 1-0
4-8
2
5-2
8-7
5
12-0
2-8
111-1
0-8
2
6-1
1-82
11-0
4-8
2
4-2
9-6
81
-06
-82
6-2
9-8
2
11
-15
-82
2-1
8-8
2
11-1
6-8
2
Met
hod
Use
o
f of
lift
wa
ter
Rem
arks
S M
GSA
N
o.
H-4
, T
oth
F
ield
.C
asi
ng:
6 In
fr
om
sur
face
to
20
0 ft;
none
be
low
. E
lectr
ic
log
sa
val
(able
in
th
e f
1 le
s
of
USG
S.
S M
Alie
n
Fie
ld.
Ca
sin
g:
8in
fr
om
su
rfa
ce
to
35
0ft;
4 In
fr
om
35
0 to
39
3ft;
4 In
sc
reen
fro
m
393
to 4
23 ft
. R
eport
ed
draw
dow
n 20
ft
after
36hrs
pu
mpi
ng
50
gpm
5-2
8-7
5.
S D
Casi
ng:
4 in
fr
om
sur
face
to
30
0 ft;
none
be
low
.
S P
Battens
Cro
ssro
ad
s N
o.1.
C
asi
ng
: 6
in
from
surf
ace to
71
4 ft;
none
belo
w.
Report
ed
dra
w
dow
n 15
ft aft
er
24
hrs
pum
ping
11
2 gp
m 4-2
9-6
8.
S 1 r
r R
eport
ed 1
y pu
mpe
d 1 5
3
gpm
in
19
77.
Table
1.
R
eco
rds
of
wells
In
th
e
Fo
rt
Ruck
er
are
a C
ontinued
We
ll W
ell
loca
tio
n
No.
(W
ATST
OR
E N
o.)
O
wne
r
118
3114
0408
5524
901
Jack
S
herr
er
119
3112
4708
5522
301
Fra
nk
Brltt
120
3115
1508
5572
301
Con
agra
In
c.
121
3115
1608
5574
201
Con
agra
In
c.
Dla
me-
A
ltitu
de
W
ate
rY
ear
De
pth
te
n of
Wa
ter-
of
land
A
bove
(+
) or
com
- of
well
we
ll bearing
su
rfa
ce
belo
w
land
D
rille
r p
lete
d
(ft)
(I
nch
es)
unit
(ft)
su
rfa
ce
(f
t)
....
. 19
77
...
4 ..
. 30
2 58.0
J.
M.
Pre
sle
y
1977
52
0 6
Tt,
Th
280
60 58
.463.4
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
a 1
Co.
19
78
880
18
Tc,
Kp
250
100
147
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
a 1
Co.
19
71
725
...
...
296
195
197.
9
leve
l
Da
te of
mea
sure
men
t
2-1
8-8
2
7-1
3-7
72-1
8-8
2
11-1
5-8
2
7-1
4-7
8
1-2
8-8
2
1-0
5-8
211-1
1-8
2
Met
hod
Use
of
of
lift
w
ate
r R
emar
ks
S S
S 1 r
r C
asi
ng:
6 In
fr
om
su
rfa
ce to
24
2 ft;
none
belo
w.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n10
0 ft
after
2 h
rs
pum
p-In
g 12
5 gp
m 7-1
3-7
7.
T
I nd
Con
agra
N
o.
2.
Casi
ng:
18
In
fro
m
su
rfa
ce
to
700
ft;
none
belo
w.
Report
ed
draw
dow
n 95
ft
after
48
hrs
pu
mpi
ng75
0 gp
m 7-1
4-7
8.
T In
d C
onag
ra
No.
1.
R
eport
ed
ly
pum
ped
750
gpm
122
3210
1508
5545
001
Tow
n o
f\C
off
ee
S
prings
La
yne
-Ce
ntr
a I
Co.
288
10,
6 T
l26
092
1946
2-2
5-7
1.
P G
SA
No.
J-2
, C
offee
Sp
rin
gs
No.
1.
C
asi
ng
: 10
In
fr
om
su
rfa
ce
to
18
5 ft;
6 In
fr
om
8
6 t
o
192
ft
and
222
to
268
ft;
6 in
sc
reen
from
19
2
to
222
ft
and
268
to
288
ft.
Report
ed I
y
pum
ped
50 g
pm
In
1946
.
Table
1.
Reco
rds
of wells
In t
he Fort R
ucker
area
Con
tinu
ed
VteM
Well lo
cati
on
No.
(WAT
STOR
E No.)
Owner
123
311000085543801
Town
of Coffee
Springs
124
311030085491101
Town
of
Be 1
1 wood
Dlam
e-
Altitude
Water
level
Year
De
pth
ter
of
Wate
r-
of la
nd
Above
(+)
or
com-
of well
well
bear
ing
surf
ace
below
land
Date
of
Method
Use
of
Driller
plet
ed
(ft)
(Inches)
unit
(ft)
surface
(ft)
meas
urem
ent
of li
ft
water
Remarks
Emme
tt H
ughe
s 1964
790
6, 4
Tnf
238
71.0
2-18-82
...
0 GSA
No.
J-4;
abandoned
Drilling C
o.
70.3
6-29-82
well.
Casi
ng:
6 In
from
surf
ace
to 200
ft;
4 In
from
200
to 7
50 ft;
none
below.
Elec
tric
logs
aval (ab
le In the
f 1 les
of USBS.
Smith
Well an
d 19
79
560
8, 4
Ttu
259
121
5-29-79
T P
Bellwood No.
1. Ca
sing
: Su
pply
Co.
8 In
from su
rfac
e to 4
90
125
310908085435601
Fort R
ucke
r Military
Rese
rvat
I on
Smit
h Well and
Supply C
o.1975
351
8, 4
Tt26
7112
110
6-28-75
6-08-82
ft;
4 In from 4
77 to
507
ft a
nd 527
to 5
40 f
t; 4
In s
creen
from 5
07 t
o 527
ft and
540 to 5
60
ft.
Repo
rted
drawdown
134
ft after
1.12 h
rs
pump
ing
150 gpm
5-29-71.
High
Bluff
No.
1.
Casi
ng:
8 In
from s
ur
face t
o 295
ft;
4 In
from 258
to 3
21 ft;
4 In
screen from 3
21 to
351
ft.
Repo
rted
dr
awdo
wn
74 ft
after
pumping
50
gpm
6-28-75.
Table
1.
Records
of wells
In the
Fort R
ucker ar
ea C
onti
nued
Well
No.
126
Well location
(WAT
STOR
E No.)
Owner
310821085320901
Town
of Ma
lver
n
Dril
ler
Powell Dr
illi
ngCo.
Year
Dept
hco
m-
of we 1
1pl
eted
(ft)
1981
313
Diam
eter
ofwell
(Inches)
12,
8,6, 4
Wate
rbe
arin
gunit
Tl
Alti
tude
Wa
ter
of land
Abov
e (+)
orsurface
below
land
(ft)
surf
ace
(ft)
320
85 77.4
level Date of
Meth
od
Use
ofmeasurement
of li
ft
water
Remarks
3-20
-81
T P
Malv
ern
No.
2.10-14-82
Casi
ng:
12 In from s
ur-
127
3108
1008
5311
101
Town
of Ma
lver
nHu
ghes
Brothers
Drl
11 Ing C
o.19
68267
12,
6Tl
290
46 48
5-04-68
10-14-82
face to 211
ft;
8 In
from 171
to 214
ft;
6 In
from 214
to 215
ft,
and
250
to 2
67 ft;
6 In
screen from 215
to 250
ft,
267
to 293
ft a
nd 4
In fr
om 2
93 t
o 313
ft.
Reported dr
awdo
wn 108.5
ft a
fter 24
hrs
pumping
108 gpm
3-20-81.
Malv
ern
No.
1. Ca
sing
: 12
In from su
rfac
e to
179
ft,
6 In
fr
om 137
to
181
ft,
188
to 213
ft
and
225
to 245
ft;
6 In
screen from 181
to 188
ft,
213
to 225
ft a
nd
245
to 267
ft.
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area
Well 10Owner: Town of Ariton - Well 1 Driller: Gray Artesian Well Co. Samples described by Randall Fleming , Geological Survey of Alabama___________
Thickness Depth
__________________________________:_________________(ft) (ft)
Tuscahoma SandSand, clear to grayish-orange, very fine to medium,
subangular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic. 10 10Sand, clear to grayish-orange, very fine to medium,with the finer fractions in abundance, subangular to sub- rounded, quartzose, glauconitic. 10 20
Sample missing. 10 30Sand, grayish-orange, very fine to fine, subangular,
quartzose, slightly glauconitic; clay, light gray, silty, micaceous, carbonaceous. 10 40
Sand, yellowish-gray, very fine to fine, subangular,quartzose, trace mica. 10 50
Sample missing. 10 60Sand, clear to moderate pink, fine to medium, sub-
angular to subrounded, quartzose, trace mica. 10 70Sand, clear to moderate pink, fine to medium, sub-
angular to subrounded, quartzose, trace mica. 10 80Sand, clear to moderate pink, fine to coarse, sub-
angular to subrounded, quartzose, trace mica. 10 90Sand, light gray, coarse to very coarse, subrounded,
quartzose; clay, light gray, silty micaceous, carbonaceous; limonitic ironstone, moderate red, sandy, clayey. 10 100
Sand, yellowish-gray, fine to coarse, subangular tosubrounded, quartzose; clay, same; limonitic ironstone,pale orange, sandy. 10 110
Sand, light gray to grayish-yellow-green, fineto very coarse, angular to subrounded, glauconitic,grains with clay coating in part. 10 120
Sand, light gray to grayish-yellow-green, fineto very coarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose,glauconitic, clay coatings on some grains. 10 130
Nanafalia FormationSand, light gray, very fine to coarse, subangular to
subrounded, quartzose; clay, light gray, silty,micaceous, carbonaceous; trace sandstone, white,calcareous; shell fragments present. 10 140
Sand, light gray, very fine to medium, subangular tosubrounded, quartzose, trace glauconitic; clay same;shell fragments and few micro fossils. 10 150
Sand, same; clay, light gray to medium light gray,silty, micaceous, calcareous; claystone, light gray,sandy glauconitic, calcareous; shell fragments andmicro fossils present. 10 160
75
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 10
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Nanafalia Formation (continued)Sample missing. 10 170Sand, light gray, very fine to medium, subangular to
subrounded, quartzose, slightly glauconitic; clay, same;shell fragments present. 20 190
Sand, light gray, very fine to medium, subangular tosubrounded, quartzose, glauconitic, clay, same; shellfragments and micro fossils (Ostracods) present. 10 200
Sand light gray, very fine to medium, subangular tosubrounded, quartzose; clay, medium gray, silty,micaceous, calcareous; clay, light gray, sandy,micaceous, calcareous; shell fragments present. 10 210
Sand, same; clay, light gray, sandy, micaceous,calcareous; clay, medium gray, same. 10 220
Sand, light gray, very fine to coarse, subangular tosubrounded, quartzose, glauconitic, fossiliferous; clay,medium gray, silty, micaceous, calcareous; shellfragments and micro fossils. 10 230
Sand, same; marl, light gray, sandy, glauconitic,porous; clay, same; micro fossils and shell fragmentspresent; Ostrea thirsae. 10 240
Sand, light gray, very fine to medium, angular tosubrounded, quartzose, glauconitic; clay, medium gray,silty, micaceous, calcareous. 10 250
Sample missing. 20 270
Clayton Formation - Contact between 250-270Sand, yellowish-gray, very fine to coarse, subangular
to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic, fossiliferous; lime stone, light gray, crystalline, fossiliferous, glau conitic in part; shell fragments and micro fossils. 10 280
Limestone, light gray, glauconitic, sandy, fossiliferous;sand, same. 10 290
Sample missing. 10 300Sand, yellowish-gray, very fine to fine, subangular,
quartzose, glauconitic; limestone, same. 10 310Sand, yellowish-gray, very fine to fine, subangular,
quartzose, glauconitic, fossiliferous; limestone, same in slightly increasing amounts; micro fossils and shell fragments present. 10 320
Sand, light gray, fine to coarse, subangular to sub- rounded, quartz, glauconitic, fossiliferous; limestone, same. 10 330
Sand, same; limestone, light gray, fossiliferous, sandy, glauconitic in part; shell fragments and micro fossils present. 10 340
76
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 10
Thickness Depth
___________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Clayton Formation -(continued)Sand, very pale orange, very fine to medium, subangular
to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic; minor amountsof limestone, same. 20 360
Sand, very light gray, very fine to medium, subangular tosubrounded, quartzose, trace glauconite and mica; limestone,light gray, sandy, glauconitic and micaceous in part,fossiliferous; micro fossils and shell fragments. 10 370
Sand, very light gray, very fine to medium, subangular tosubrounded, quartzose; limestone, same. 10 380
Sand, very light gray, very fine to medium, angular tosubrounded, quartzose, trace glauconitic and mica; smallamount of limestone, same. 10 390
Sample with trace clay, medium gray , silty, micaceous. 20 410 Sand, very light gray, fine to coarse, subangular to
subrounded, quartzose; limestone, same. 10 420 Sample missing. 10 430 Sand, light gray, very fine to coarse, angular to sub-
rounded, quartzose, trace mica; limestone, light gray,sandy, fossiliferous. 10 440
Providence SandSample missing 10 450Sand, same as above; clay, medium gray, silty, calca
reous, micaceous; limestone, same. 10 460Sand, light gray, fine to very coarse, subangular to
subrounded, quartzose; clay, same; limestone, same. 10 470Sand, yellowish-gray, very fine to medium, angular
to subrounded, quartzose, micaceous; clay, same; limestone. 10 480Sand, yellowish-gray, very fine to medium, angular
to subrounded, quartzose, micaceous; limestone, same;clay, same. 10 490
Sample missing. 10 500Sand, pale yellowish-orange, very fine to fine,
angular to subangular, quartzose, micaceous. 10 510Sample missing 10 520Sand, light gray, very fine to medium, angular to sub-
rounded, quartzose, feldspar fragments present; clay, medium gray to medium light gray, silty, micaceous, calcareous; limestone, same as above. 10 530
Sand, yellowish-gray, very fine to medium, angular tosubrounded, quartzose, trace feldspar fragments; clay, same. 30 560
Sand, same; marl, light gray, sandy, micaceous,glauconitic, fossiliferous. 10 570
77
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 24Owner: Town of Ozark - Well 1 Driller: Layne-Central Company Samples described by Randall Fleming/ Geological Survey of Alabama____________
Thickness Depth
____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Lisbon FormationSand, moderate reddish-brown, very fine to coarse, angular
to subrounded, quartzose, some grains with red clay coatings, fine grains in excess. 10 10
Sand, moderate reddish-orange, very fine to coarse, angular to subrounded, quartzose, grains with red clay coating, fine grains in excess. 10 20
Sand, moderate reddish-orange very fine to coarse, angular to rounded, quartzose, grains with red clay coating, fine grains in excess. 10 30
Sand, grayish-pink, very fine to coarse, angular to sub- rounded, quartzose, slight frosting, fine grains in excess; clay varicolored (orange to pink), silty to sandy. 10 40
Tallahatta FormationSand, very pale orange, fine to coarse, subangular to rounded,
quartzose, slight frosting in part, medium grains in excess. 10 50Sand, very pale orange, fine to coarse, subangular to sub-
rounded, quartzose, slight frosting in part, medium grains in excess. 10 60
Sand, very light gray, medium to very coarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, slight frosting, medium grains in excess. 10 70
Sand, very light gray, medium to very coarse, subangular to rounded, quartzose, slightly frosted, few grains in fine pebble size. 10 80
Sand, very light gray, medium to very coarse, subangular to rounded, quartzose, slightly frosted, few grains in pebble size. 2 82
Hatchetigbee FormationClay, medium gray, silty, micaceous, carbonaceous; sand, very
light gray, very fine to coarse, angular to subrounded,quartzose, trace glauconite; shell fragments present. 8 90
Clay, medium gray, silty, micaceous, carbonaceous; sand, same. 10 100 Clay, medium gray, silty, micaceous, carbonaceous. 10 110
Bashi Marl Member (of some authors)Marl, light olive-gray, glauconitic, sandy, fossiliferous;
clay, light gray, silty, micaceous, glauconitic, fossil iferous; clay, light gray, silty, micaceous, glauconitic, fossiliferous; clay, light gray, silty, micaceous, glauconitic, fossiliferous, calcareous; sand, light gray, very fine to medium, angular to subangular, quartzose, extremely glauconitic; abundant shell fragments present. 10 120
78
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 24
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Tuscahoma SandSand, yellowish-gray, very fine to coarse, subangular to
subrounded, quartzose; marl, same; abundant shell fragments,badly weathered. 8 128
Sand, yellowish-gray, very fine to coarse, subangular to sub- rounded, quartzose; marl, same; abundant shell fragments, badly weathered. 12 140
Sand, light gray, very fine grained to coarse, angular to sub- rounded, quartzose, glauconitic, very fine grains in excess; clay, light olive-gray, silty, micaceous, carbonaceous. 20 160
Sand, very light gray, very fine to fine, angular, quartzose, glauconitic, micaceous; clay, light gray, silty, micaceous, carbonaceous; trace marl, same. 9 169
Sand, yellowish-gray, very fine to medium, angular to sub- rounded, slightly glauconitic, some grains frosted; clay, medium light gray, silty, micaceous, carbonaceous. 18 187
Clay, medium light gray, sandy to silty, micaceous, carbona ceous; sand, same. 13 200
Clay, medium light gray, sandy, micaceous, carbonaceous. 10 210Sand, light gray, very fine to medium, angular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic (large-grained and a pale yellow- green color); clay, same. 4 214
Sand, light gray to moderate greenish-yellow, fine to coarse,subangular to rounded, quartzose, glauconitic; clay, same. 11 225
Sand, light gray to light greenish-gray, medium to coarse,subangular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic. 10 235
Nanafalia FormationSand, same; marl, light gray, sandy, glauconitic; clay,medium light gray, silty, micaceous, carbonaceous. 10 245
Sand, pale yellowish-orange, fine to very coarse, subangularto rounded, quartzose, glauconitic; shell fragments present. 10 255
Sand, light gray to light greenish-gray, fine to medium, sub- angular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic, frosted inpart. 20 275
No samples taken. 5 280 Sand, yellowish-gray, very fine to medium, subangular to
subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic, micaceous, fossil-iferous; Robulus sp.? 10 29 °
Sand, light gray to light greenish-gray, fine to coarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic,
fossiliferous, shell fragments and micro fossils. 10 300 Sand, light gray, very fine to medium, subangular, quartzose,
glauconitic; marl, light gray, sandy, micaceous,fossiliferous. 10 310
Clay, medium light gray, silty, micaceous, calcareous;marl, same; sand, same. 10 32°
79
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 24
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Nanafalia Formation (continued)Sand, yellowish-gray, very fine to medium, subangular,
quartzose, fossiliferous; clay, same; shell fragments and micro fossils (ostracods). 10 330
Sand, same; clay, medium light gray, silty to sandy,micaceous, calcareous. 10 340
Sand, yellowish-gray, fine to coarse, subangular to sub- rounded, quartzose, frosted in part; clay, same. 10 350
Clayton FormationLimestone, very light gray, silty, fossiliferous; sand,
light gray, coarse to very coarse, subrounded, quartzose, frosted; clay, same. 10 360
Limestone, same; light gray, fine to coarse, subangular tosubrounded, quartzose, frosted. 10 370
Limestone, very light gray, silty, fossiliferous; sand, yellowish gray, very fine to coarse, subangular to sub- rounded, quartzose, frosted in part. 19 389
Limestone, very light gray, porous, fossiliferous, silty. 79 468Limestone, very light gray, silty, fossiliferous; trace sand. 10 478Limestone, same; sand, light gray, medium to coarse, sub-
rounded, quartzose, micaceous, frosted in part. 14 492Limestone, same; sand, light gray, medium to coarse, sub- angular to subrounded, quartzose, frosted in part. 8 500
Providence SandSand, light gray, fine to coarse, subangular to subrounded,
quartzose, micaceous, frosted; limestone, same. 8 508Sand, yellowish-gray, fine to coarse, subangular to sub-
rounded, quartzose, frosted; limestone, same. 12 520Sand, light gray, very fine to medium, angular to subrounded,
quartzose, slight frosting; trace limestone, same. 10 530No sample. 9 539Sand, very pale orange, very fine to fine, subangular,
quartzose, trace feldspar fragments. 1 540Sand, very pale orange, very fine to fine, subangular,
quartzose, micaceous, feldspar fragments; trace limestone. 10 550Sand, light gray, very fine to medium, subangular to sub-
rounded, quartzose, micaceous, frosted; limestone, very light gray, micaceous, fossiliferous. 10 560
Limestone, very light gray, micaceous, sandy, fossiliferous;sand, same. 21 581
Sand, light gray, very fine to medium, angular to subrounded,quartzose, slightly fossiliferous; limestone, same. 9 590
80
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 24
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Providence Sand (continued)Clay, medium gray, silty, micaceous, calcareous; sand, same. 20 610Sand, light gray, very fine to coarse, subangular to rounded,quartzose, micaceous; clay, same; trace limestone. 20 630
Clay, light gray, silty, micaceous, carbonaceous, calcareous;sand, same. 30 660
Clay, same; sand, light gray, very fine to coarse, angularto subrounded, quartzose, micaceous. 20 680
Limestone, very light gray, sandy, fossiliferous; sand,yellowish-gray, medium to very coarse, subangular torounded, quartzose, feldspar fragments. 20 700
Ripley FormationSand, light gray to grayish-orange, fine to coarse, sub-
angular to subrounded, quartzose, feldspar fragments present, micaceous; limestone, same. 20 720
No sample. 10 730Sand, same; limestone, yellowish-gray, sandy, micaceous. 20 750Sand, light gray to pale yellowish-orange, fine to very
coarse, subangular to rounded, quartzose, feldspar frag ments; trace limestone, same. 26 776
Sand, light gray to grayish-orange, fine to coarse, sub- angular to rounded, quartzose, feldspar fragments present, slight micaceous; trace limestone, same. 25 801
Sand, very pale orange, very fine to fine, angular to sub- angular, quartzose, micaceous. . 22 823
Sand, very pale orange, very fine to fine, angular to sub- angular, quartzose, micaceous, few ostracods. 57 880
81
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 34 Owner: Alabama Highway Department Driller: Alabama Highway Department
U.S. Highway 231 Rest AreaSamples described by John C. Scott___________________________________
Thickness Depth
____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Lisbon FormationSand, yellowish-orange to pale red-purple, medium to very
coarse, silty, clayey; pale red-purple, sandy clay. 10 10 Sand, moderate orange-pink, medium to very coarse, silty;
pale red-purple, sandy clay. 10 20 Sand, very pale orange, medium to very coarse withgranules and pebbles. 10 30
Tallahatta and Hatchetigbee Formations, undifferentiated Clay, pale red-purple, sandy, silty; very pale orange,
medium to very coarse, silty sand; sparse fossilfragments. 10 40
Clay, pale red-purple to reddish-brown, silty, sandy,sparsely micaceous; yellowish-orange, medium to verycoarse, silty sand. 10 50
Sandy, yellowish-orange, medium to very coarse,silty; pale red-purple, sandy clay. 10 60
Sand, grayish-orange, medium to very coarse,sparsely glauconitic, silty, moderate red to grayish- orange-pink, sandy clay. 10 70
Sand, yellowish-gray, medium to very coarse,sparsely glauconitic; moderate red and dark olive-gray,sandy clay; sparse fossil fragments. 10 80
Limestone, yellowish-gray, very sandy, sparsely glauconitic;yellowish gray, fine to coarse, silty, clayey sand. 10 90
Clay, olive-gray, finely sandy, silty, sparsely micaceous. 20 110 Sand, greenish-gray, fine to coarse, very glauconitic,
clayey, silty; light gray calcareous glauconitic sandstone. 10 120 Sandstone, yellowish-gray, calcareous, glauconitic, sparsely
fossiliferous; olive-gray, silty clay. 10 130
Tuscahoma SandClay, olive-gray, sandy, glauconitic; yellowish gray calca
reous, glauconitic, sandstone. 10 140Sand, olive-gray, medium to coarse, silty, fossili
ferous, glauconitic; olive-gray, silty, sandy clay; yellowish-gray calcareous, glauconitic sandstone. Fossil fragments common. 10 150
Clay, olive-gray, sandy, silty, sparsely glauconitic;yellowish-gray sparsely glauconitic, calcareous, sandstone. 20 170
Clay, medium light-gray, finely sandy, silty, micaceous,carbonaceous. 40 210
82
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 34
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Tuscahoma Sand (continued)Clay, light olive-gray, sandy, silty, micaceous, carbona
ceous, sparsely glauconitic. 10 220Sand, light gray, medium to very coarse, silty,
sparsely glauconitic; light olive-gray, micaceous,carbonaceous, sandy clay. 20 240
Sand, light gray, medium to very coarse, sparselyglauconitic, silty; light gray calcareous fossiliferous,sandstone; fossil fragments common to abundant. 30 270
83
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 35 Owner: U.S. Geological Survey Driller: Smith Well and Supply Company
Dale County Observation Well Samples described by Jack T. Kidd, Geological Survey of Alabama______________
Thickness Depth
____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Quaternary terrace depositsSand, grayish-orange, fine to very coarse, subangular to
subrounded, consists of predominantly clear quartz coated with grayish-orange clay. 10 10
Sand, same, increase in coarse to very coarse, some granules; several fragments of parent material present which consist of clayey sand, composed of light gray and light brown clay matrix with fine to very coarse sand. 10 20
Sand and gravel, very pale orange, medium sand to very fine gravel, quartzose, subangular to subrounded, some grayish- orange clay staining; heavy minerals common, including kyanite, and unidentified black and amber minerals. 10 30
Hatchetigbee FormationClayey sand or sandy clay, very glauconitic, consists of
moderate reddish-brown clay, same very pale orange and grayish-orange-pink clay streaks, and sand, fine to medium, some coarse, subangular. 10 40
Clayey sand, sandy clay, and clay, predominantly grayish- orange glauconitic clayey sand, fine to medium, with lesser amounts of very pale orange clay, and grayish- red sandy clay. 10 50
Tuscahoma SandSand, grayish-orange, fine to very coarse, subangular to
subrounded, glauconitic, quartzose, some pebbles; sandyclay and clayey sand, grayish-orange fine to very coarse,glauconite; small amount of clay, grayish-orange andvery light gray. 10 60
Sand, same; clay, very light gray, very finely micaceous;clay, dark yellowish-orange, fine sandy, glauconitic. 10 70
Clay, light gray, some orange laminae, very finely micaceous,some fragments sandy due to apparent mixing and coatingduring drilling; sand, grayish-orange, fine to verycoarse, some pebbles, subangular to subrounded, quartzose,glauconitic. 10 80
Clay, light gray, very finely micaceous; clayey silty sand,grayish-orange, very fine to fine, glauconitic, micaceous;sand, light gray to grayish-orange, fine to very coarse,some pebbles, subangular to subrounded. 10 90
Silty clay and siltstone, medium light gray, very micaceous,glauconitic, carbonaceous. 10 100
Same, predominately silty clay. 10 110
84
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 35
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Tuscahoma Sand (continued)Silty clay and siltstone, same. 20 130Silty shale and siltstone, same; sand, light gray to
greenish-gray, coarse to very coarse, subangular to sub- rounded, quartzose, large glauconite grains, trace ofpyrite. 10 140
Sand, greenish-gray to light gray, coarse to very coarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, very glauconitic, contains shell fragments (oysters?), grades into sandy limestone; few large fragments of claystone, light gray;small Pecten noted. 10 150
Sandy limestone, very light gray to yellowish-gray composed of sand, clear to greenish-gray, medium to very coarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, with glauconite, shell fragments and matrix of indurated white lime and lesser amounts of light olive-gray less indurated marly matrix; large amounts of loose sand, assumed to bederived from sandy limestone. 10 160
Sandy limestone and sand, same, predominantly sandy lime stone with light olive-gray marly matrix; shell fragments. 10 170
Sandy limestone with white matrix, same; sand, same; shellfragments. 10 180
Sandy limestone, same; sand, same; shell fragments, traceof pyrite. 10 190
Sand, clear to greenish-gray, medium to very coarse, sub- angular to subrounded, quartzose, very glauconitic, small percentage of sand cemented by marly matrix and parent rock for sand appears to be marly sand; small amount of white sandy limestone; trace of moderate reddish-brownsandy clay; shell fragments, forams. 10 200
Sandy, silty marl, glauconitic, very calcareous, grades into sandstone, light gray, very fine to medium, somecoarse; small amount of white sandy marl; shell fragments. 10 210
Sand, light gray, to greenish-gray, very fine to very coarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, silty calcareous matrix in part; shell fragments, fish teeth,phosphate, glauconite. 10 220
Silty sand, light gray, very fine to medium, some coarse, glauconitic, micaceous, calcareous in part, grades into silty sandy marl in part; shell fragments, fish teeth,phosphate glauconite. 10 230
Silty sand, medium light gray, very fine to fine, some medium to coarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, micaceous, glauconitic, very silty, some fragments slightly calcareous due to scattered shell fragments. 20 250
85
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 35
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Tuscahoma Sand (continued)Calcareous siltstone and/or silty sandstone, light gray,
composed of silt and very fine clear quartz sand, cal careous matrix, some scattered fine to coarse sand, shell fragments. 10 260
Nanafalia FormationSandy lime-sandy marl-calcareous sand, light gray, composed
of clear very fine to very coarse quartz in indurated lime matrix and less indurated marly matrix; numerous shell fragments and one shark tooth noted. 10 270
Calcareous sand, sandy lime, sandy marl, light gray, composed of clear to light gray to greenish-gray, very fine to very coarse quartz sand, in lime or marl matrix; numerous shell fragments; Nummulites. 10 280
Sandy lime, calcareous sand, medium light gray, glauconitic, micaceous, fossiliferous, sand is colorless to light greenish gray, very fine to very coarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose; shell fragments. 10 290
Sand, colorless to light gray, coarse to very coarse; sub- angular to subrounded, quartzose; trace of light greenish- gray sand; trace of pyrite. 10 300
Sand and gravel, light gray, coarse sand to very finepebbles, predominantly subrounded, quartzose, most grainshave small amount of dark gray clay coating, some grainscoated or cemented with pyrite; shell fragments; smallamounts of various lithologies probably from cavings. 10 310
Lignitic sand, brownish-black to brownish-gray, very fine to very coarse, subangular to subrounded, pyritic, sand present as coarse dark coated loose grains and as very fine to fine grains in a lignitic matrix. 10 320
Same, some fragments grade into silty and very fine sandylignite; large flakes of muscovite. 10 330
Same. 10 340Sandy and clayey silt, medium gray, fine to very coarse
sandy, very micaceous with large flakes of muscovite, glauconitic. 10 350
Silt, medium dark gray, clayey, very micaceous with large muscovite flakes, very fine to fine sandy, some scattered coarser grains, carbonaceous in part. 20 370
Lignitic sandy siltstone, dark gray to brownish-black, con sists of siltstone in a lignite or carbonaceous matrix with abundant very fine to very coarse subangular to subrounded quartz sand, abundant muscovite, few shell fragments. 10 380
86
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 35
Thickness Depth
___________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Clayton FormationChalky limestone, very light gray to yellowish-gray,
bioclastic. 10 390Carbonaceous silty sand, medium gray, very fine to fine,
some medium to very coarse, subangular to subrounded, various amounts of pyrite, muscovite, glauconite, car bonized wood; small amount of shale, brownish-gray. 10 400
Chalky limestone, very light gray to yellowish-gray, fine to coarse sandy, fossiliferous; sand, light gray, very fine to medium, some coarse to very coarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic, micaceous; trace of silty sandstone. 10 410
Chalky limestone, very light gray, bioclastic. 10 420Chalky limestone, same and sandy in part. 10 430Sand, colorless to light gray, coarse to very coarse,
subangular to subrounded, quartzose; chalky limestone, same; silty carbonaceous shale, probably cavings. 10 440
Sand, same. 10 450Sandy, limestone, pinkish gray to very light gray, contains
fine to coarse colorless quartz sand, fossiliferous. 10 460Same. 10 470Sand, colorless to light gray, medium to very coarse, sub- angular to subrounded, quartzose, some grains coated with white chalky material indicating the sand was derived from a calcareous sandstone or a rotten sandy chalk; sandy limestone same as above; trace of glauconite; fossils - gastropod, echinoid spine, forams. 10 480
Sandy, limestone, very light gray (fresh), most fragments coated with light olive-gray clay, probably during drilling, otherwise same as sandy limestone above. 10 490
Providence SandSilty sandy chalk, light olive-gray, sand is fine to coarse,
subangular to subrounded quartz; sandy limestone, same as above; glauconite, gastropod, forams; abundant sand, probably derived from chalk and limestone, colorless with trace of grayish orange, fine to very coarse. 10 500
Sandy limestone, very light gray, glauconitic in part, fossiliferous, sand is colorless to light gray, fine to coarse, subangular to subrounded; abundant sand, probably derived from sandy limestone, same; silty chalk, same; fossils - bryozoans, shell fragments. 10 510
Sandy limestone, same, grades into calcareous sandstone, and sandy silty chalk, very micaceous, glauconitic; abundant sand, colorless to light gray, trace of grayish- orange, fine to very coarse, subangular to subrounded,quartzose. 10 520
87
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 35
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Providence Sand (continued)Sandy limestone, same; abundant sand, same; trace of clay,moderate red. 10 530
Sandy limestone, same; sand, same, slight increase inyellowish-gray grains, but still only a very smallpercentage of total sand; trace of sandy clay - clayeysand, dark yellowish-orange, very fine to fine. 10 540
Sandy limestone, same; sand, same; trace of clay, moderatered, fine sandy (only 2 or 3 fragments present). 17 557
88
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 63Owner: Meadow Lawn Cemetery Driller: Burrell Drilling Company Samples described by Eleanor T. Caldwell________________________________
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Iron stained sand. 90 90 Same; red and pale green clay. 45 135 Fine to coarse, gray, glauconitic sand. 44 179 Fine to very coarse, gray, glauconitic, argillaceous sand. 24 203 Fine to coarse, green, glauconitic sand. 23 226 Same; white, hard, fossiliferous, sandy limestone; gray,
soft, micaceous, glauconitic/ silty marl; trace of darkgray, soft, micaceous, carbonaceous, noncalcareous shale. 23 249
Same. 47 296 Fine to coarse, gray, glauconitic, shelly sand; dark gray
shale as above; fragments of gray, hard, fossiliferous,glauconitic, very sandy limestone. 46 342
Dark gray, soft, sticky, micaceous, carbonaceous, non- calcareous shale; sand as above. 15 457
Mostly shale as above; trace of green, coarse, glauconiticsand. 23 480
Fine to coarse, green, glauconitic sand; rare shell fragments. 23 503 Same; fragments of white, hard, slightly glauconitic, very
sandy limestone. 68 571 Mostly sand as above,- some coarse orange sand; abundant shell
fragments. 23 594 Fine to coarse, clayey and limey, fossiliferous sand; common
shell fragments; corded Camerina common. 46 640 White, porous, coquinoid limestone; calcareous algae; shell
fragments. 163 803
89
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 70Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Well 9 Driller: Layne-Central Company Samples described by John C. Scott___________________________________
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Tallahatta and Hatchetigbee FormationsSand, dark yellowish-orange, medium to very coarse,
angular to subangular, silty. 10 36Sand, dark yellowish-orange, medium to very coarse,
angular to subangular, silty, sparsely glauconitic. (Glauconite is weathered to pale green). 28 64
Sand, yellowish-gray, fine to coarse, angular tosubangular, glauconitic, slightly silty. Light olive- gray finely micaceous clay. 31 95
Sand, yellowish-brown to grayish-brown, medium to very coarse, glauconitic, silty. Fossil fragments and microfossils common. Medium gray sandy, silty glauconitic, micaceous clay. Most sand grains are coated with iron oxide. 22 117
Clay, light olive-gray, sandy, silty, glauconitic, micaceous.Fossils and fossil fragments scarce. 23 140
Sand and calcareous sandstone, light olive-gray, medium to coarse, very glauconitic, fossiliferous, fossils and fragments common 1. Light olive-gray calcareous sandy clay. Calcareous sandstone is cemented with soft limestone. 22 162
Tuscahoma Sand (160 feet from E-log)Clay, light olive-gray, sandy, calcareous, glauconitic, very
fossiliferous, lignitic, light gray calcareous sandstone. 22 184 Clay, light olive-gray, slightly sandy, micaceous, sparsely
lignitic. A few fragments of white limestone. 46 230 Clay, olive-gray, silty, micaceous, sparsely lignitic. 22 252 Sand, greenish-gray, medium to coarse, very
glauconitic. Olive-gray, silty micaceous clay; a fewfragments of calcareous sandstone. 22 274
Sand, greenish-gray, medium to coarse, glauconitic,micaceous, sparsely fossiliferous. Yellowish-gray towhite calcareous sandstone. Olive-gray silty clay.Fossil fragments common. 23 297
Nanafalia Formation (300 feet from E-log)Sand, greenish-gray, medium to coarse, glauconitic,
sparsely pyritic; some grains stained and coated withiron. Pale orange to white glauconitic mudstone (siltstone).Olive-gray silty clay. Top Tnf (?). 23 320
Sand, greenish-gray, fine to medium, glauconitic,sparsely micaceous. Light olive-gray silty clay. 23 343
90
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 70
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Nanafalia Formation (continued)Sandstone, light greenish-gray, calcareous, fossiliferous; microfossils and fossil fragments common to abundant. Olive gray sandy clay. Greenish-gray coarse to very coarse silty sand. Large sand grains are mostly subrounded. 45 388
Calcareous sandstone and sand same as above except fossils and fragments more abundant. Odontogryphaea thirsae, corals and microfossils (O. thirsae zone [?]). 23 411
Sand, greenish-gray, mostly medium to coarse, siltyglauconitic, fossiliferous, lignitic. Light gray to whitecalcareous sandstone. 22 433
Clayton Formation (432 feet from E-log)Limestone, very pale orange to white, slightly sandy, very
fossiliferous (fossils comprise more than half of limestone).Light greenish gray calcareous sandstone. Olive-gray siltylignitic clay. 23 456
Limestone, yellowish-gray, very fossiliferous. 23 479Limestone, same as above except composed almost entirely
of fossils and fossil fragments. 23 502Limestone, yellowish-gray to white, very fossiliferous. 23 525Limestone, same as above except slightly darker yellowish-
gray. 46 571Limestone, yellowish-gray to light olive-gray, very fossili
ferous, coarsely sandy. Light greenish-gray to white calcareous sandstone. 22 593
Providence Sand (595 feet from E-log)Sand, light greenish-gray to yellowish-gray, medium to very
coarse, sparsely glauconitic, fossiliferous.Yellowish-gray to white calcareous sandstone. 23 616
Sand, yellowish-gray, medium to very coarse,sparsely glauconitic and fossiliferous (glauconite andfossils may be from above). A few fragments of pyrite. 23 639
Sand, yellowish-gray, mostly medium to coarse,sparsely glauconitic and fossiliferous. Light gray towhite calcareous sandstone. 22 661
Limestone, yellowish-gray to light olive-gray, sandy,fossiliferous. Very light gray to white calcareoussandstone. 22 683
Sand, yellowish-gray to white, coarse to very coarse,calcareous, fossiliferous. Light gray towhite calcareous sandstone. 23 706
Sand, yellowish-gray, medium to very coarse,fossiliferous (corals abundant). Light gray to whitecalcareous sandstone. Yellowish-gray to yellowish- orange silty sand mottled and stained with iron. 22 728
91
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 70
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Providence Sand (continued)Clay, olive-gray, sandy, silty, fossiliferous, carbonaceous
calcareous. Light gray to white calcareous sandstone. 23 751 Clay, light olive-gray, sandy, fossiliferous, calcareous,
silty. 22 773 Sand, yellowish-gray, mostly medium to coarse, silty,
calcareous, sparsely fossiliferous. Light gray to whitecalcareous sandstone. 23 796
Ripley Formation (810 feet from E-log)Clay, yellowish-gray to light olive-gray, sandy, silty,
calcareous. Light greenish-gray, medium to coarsesilty sand. 23 819
Sandstone, light gray to white, calcareous, pyritic, fossili ferous. Light gray to white, medium to very coarsesilty sand. Greenish-gray calcareous sandstone. 45 864
Sand, light greenish-gray, fine to medium, silty,micaceous, carbonaceous (calcareous matrix). Light grayto white calcareous sandstone. A few fossil fragments. 23 887
Sandstone, light gray to white, calcareous, fossiliferous.Light greenish gray, fine to medium micaceous,silty sand. Fossil fragments common. 22 909
Sand, greenish-gray, fine to medium, silty, micaceous.Greenish gray sandy, micaceous clay. Light gray to whitecalcareous sandstone. 23 932
Sample missing 23 955 Clay, greenish-gray to olive-gray, finely sandy, silty,
micaceous, carbonaceous, calcareous. 67 1022 Clay, greenish-gray to olive-gray, finely sandy, silty,
micaceous, carbonaceous, calcareous. A few microfossilsand fossil fragments. 46 1068
Sand, greenish-gray, fine to medium, finelyglauconitic, silty. Greenish-gray, silty carbonaceousclay. Light gray to white calcareous sandstone. 23 1091
Clay, light olive-gray, silty, finely sandy, micaceous,calcareous. Greenish-gray, fine, silty sand. 45 1136
Clay, light olive-gray, silty, calcareous, carbonaceous,micaceous. 23 1159
92
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker Area Continued
Well 72Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Well 8 Driller: Layne-Central Company Samples described by Charles W. Copeland, Geological Survey of Alabama; ___formation boundaries determined by John C. Scott, U.S. Geological Survey
Thickness Depth
_____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Tallahatta and Hatchetigbee FormationsSand, very pale orange, fine to coarse, subangular to sub-
rounded, quartzose with weathered glauconite and traces of kyanite. 40 40
Sand, very pale orange, fine to very coarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic with minor amounts of medium light gray, carbonaceous clay and yellowish-gray to grayish-green, calcareous, glauconitic, marl or claystone. 22 62
Limestone, very light gray to light greenish-gray, sandy, glauconitic, fossiliferous; sand, very light gray, fine to medium, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic; fossils, mainly fragments of pelecypod shells and bryozoans. 29 91
Tuscahoma SandClay, medium light gray, silty, slightly micaceous and
carbonaceous; sand, very light gray, fine to medium,subangular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic. 30 121
Clay and sand, same. 48 169 Clay, medium light gray, silty, micaceous, carbonaceous
with limestone from above; few pieces of indurated, gray,fine grained, calcareous, sandstone. 23 192
Sand, very light gray to light greenish-gray, medium tocoarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic;trace of medium light gray, carbonaceous clay. 23 215
Sand, some with coating of yellowish to gray clay on grains. 23 238 Sand, same, grains now mostly clean without clay coating. 44 282
Nanafalia Formation (Top at 260 feet from E-log)Sand, some with minor amounts of medium gray clay and white,
finely sandy, glauconitic, limestone. 23 305Sand, very light gray, fine to medium with some coarse, sub-
angular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic, fossili ferous; trace gray clay; fossils, mainly fragments of oyster shells. 23 328
Sand, same, abundantly fossiliferous with white, finely sandy, argillaceous limestone; few forams, ostracods, abundant oyster shell fragments. 23 351
Sand, very light gray, medium to coarse, subangular to sub- rounded, quartzose, fossiliferous with glauconite trace; abundant oyster shell fragments, echinoid fragments and large forams, Nummulities. 22 373
93
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 72
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Nanafalia Formation (continued)Sand, very light gray and yellowish-gray, medium to coarse,
subangular to subrounded, quartzose, fossiliferous; lime stone, white, sandy, fossiliferous; shell debris and microfossils. 23 396
Clayton FormationLimestone, white, sandy in part, coquinoidal in part,
abundantly fossiliferous; mainly molds and casts. 23 419Limestone, white, mainly coquinoidal. 45 464Limestone, same; bryozoans abundant. 23 487Limestone, same and limestone, light olive-gray, porouswith saccharoidal texture and appearance. 23 510
Limestone, white, mainly coquinoidal. 22 532Sand, very light gray to white, fine to coarse, subangular
to subrounded, quartzose, fossiliferous, slightly glauconitic; limestone, white, coquinoidal; few ostracods and benthonic foraminifers. 23 555
Sand, same, calcite cemented in part; limestone, coquinoidal,same and some white, medium to coarse, sandy limestone. 23 578
Providence Sand (Top at 570 feet from E-log)Sand, white, medium to coarse, quartzose; limestone, sandy
and coquinoidal, same. 23 601Limestone, white, medium to coarsely sandy, fossiliferous;
limestone, coquinoidal, same, in lesser amounts; sand, same. 22 623
Limestone, white, coquinoidal in part, fossiliferous, and limestone, very light gray to white, medium to coarse sandy, porous, leached in part, with saccharoidal appearance; sand, medium to coarse, subangular to sub- rounded, quartzose; pyrite trace; few leached benthonic foraminifers and ostracods. 23 646
Limestone, coquinoidal and sandy, same; sand, same. 23 669Limestone, same, slightly glauconitic; sand, same, some
grains yellowish-gray; limestone, light gray, very finely sandy and silty; trace medium gray, finely sandy, slightly calcareous clay. 23 692
Limestone, same with clay, medium gray, finely sandy,slightly calcareous; few benthonic foraminifers. 22 714
Sand, very light gray to yellowish-gray, medium to verycoarse, subangular to subrounded, poorly sorted, quartzose; clay, medium gray to yellowish-gray, finely sandy, lime stones from above. 23 737
94
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 72
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Providence Sand (continued)Limestone, white to yellowish-gray, medium to coarsely
sandy, fossiliferous; sand, medium to very coarse,same; shell fragments.
Sand, very light gray to yellowish-gray, subangular tosubrounded, quartzose, clayey; limestone, very lightgray, silty, very finely sandy with trace of glauconite;clay is medium light gray, very finely sandy, calcareous
Ripley Formation (Top at 775 feet from E-log)Sand, very light gray to white, medium, subangular to
subrounded, quartzose with glauconite trace.Sand, very light gray to white, fine to medium, sub-
angular to subrounded, quartzose with glauconite and mica trace; limestone, white, finely sand; trace medium gray clay.
Sand, same; limestone, same in minor amounts; clay trace, same.
Sand, very light gray to white, fine to medium, sub- angular to subrounded, quartzose, slightly glauconitic and micaceous; micas are muscovite and chlorite.
Sand, same with muscovite, chlorite, and possible biotite micas; limestone, white, finely sandy; clay, medium gray, silty, in trace amounts.
Sand, very light gray to white, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, micaceous, slightly glauconitic, fossili ferous; few benthonic foraminifers; clay, medium light gray to yellowish-gray, finely sandy.
Sand, very light gray to white, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, micaceous (mainly muscovite), slightly glauconitic.
Sand, same with light gray, finely sandy limestone and pyrite.
Sand, same with light gray, finely sandy limestone, pyrite and abundant fragments of oyster shells.
Sand, same with light gray, finely sandy limestone and pyrite.
Sand, same and sandy limestone, same; limestone and sand percentage in the chips is about equal.
Sand, same and sandy limestone or limey sandstone, same; benthonic foraminifers and ostracods.
Sand, same and light gray, finely sandy, micaceous, calcareous clay; ostracods.
Sand, same and light gray, finely sandy, micaceous, calcareous, fossiliferous, chalky clay or calcareous clay; calcareous and arenaceous benthonic foraminifers and ostracods.
95
23
23
23
22
23
22
23
23
22
23
22
23
23
23
22
23
760
783
806
828
851
873
896
919
941
964
986
1009
1032
1055
1077
1100
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 76Owner: U.S. Army - Ft Rucker Cairns Airfield Driller: Layne-Central Company Samples described by Neil E. Moss, Geological Survey of Alabama; formation
boundaries determined by John C. Scott, U.S. Geological Survey.____________Thickness Depth
__________________ _________________________________ (ft) (ft)
Lisbon FormationSand, very light gray to very pale orange, fine to coarse,
subangular to subrounded, quartzose, micaceouswith abundant clay, grayish-orange and light red. 10 10
Sand, white to pale yellowish-orange, coarse to verycoarse, some granules, subangular to subrounded,quartzose. 10 20
Sand, white to moderate reddish-orange, fine to verycoarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose,with some clay, moderate reddish orange. 14 34
Clay, moderate reddish-orange, finely micaceous, withsand, very light gray, fine to coarse, subangular tosubrounded, quartzose. 10 44
Sand, same, with clay, same. 10 54 Sand, white to very light gray, some moderate reddish
orange, medium to very coarse, subangularto rounded, quartzose, with traces of clay, same andglauconite. 9 63
Sand, same, fine to very coarse, with clay,moderate reddish-orange and light red. 29 92
Tallahatta and Hatchetigbee FormationsSand, white to very light gray to grayish-yellow to pale
yellowish-green, fine to very coarse, subangularto subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic, with limestone,very light to yellowish-gray, very finely crystalline,clay, yellowish to light olive-gray, and fragments ofpelecypods, gastropods, and echinoderms. 32 124
Sand, same, except with limestone, pale yellowish-orangeto very light gray. 20 144
Shell fragments, pelecypod, gastropod, bryozoan, andechinoderm, with glauconite, and trace of sand. 11 155
Clay, medium to light olive-gray, finely micaceous,glauconitic, carbonaceous. 10 165
Tuscahoma Sand (top at 186 feet from E-log)Clay, same, except light olive to olive-gray 41 206 Clay, same, light olive-gray 11 217 Sand, white to yellowish-gray, fine to very coarse,
subangular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic,with limestone, yellowish-gray, very finelycrystalline, clay, same, and fragments of gastropods,pelecypods, and echinoderms. 10 227
96
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 76
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Tuscahoma Sand (continued)Sand, very light to yellowish-gray, fine,
subangular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic,micaceous, with clay, same. 21 248
Clay, light olive-gray, some moderate reddish-orange,micaceous, carbonaceous, glauconitic, sandy, fossili-ferous, foraminifera, trace shell fragments. 20 268
Clay, light olive-gray, micaceous, glauconitic, slightlysandy, with foraminifera. 21 289
Sand, very light gray to pale olive, medium to verycoarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose,glauconitic with trace clay and shell fragments. 22 311
Sand, same, with clay light greenish-gray and moderatereddish-orange. 10 321
Sand, same. 10 331 Sand, same, medium. 11 342 Sand, same. 42 384
Nanafalia Formation (Top at 378 feet from E-log) Sand, same, with limestone, very light to yellowish-
gray, very finely crystalline, fossiliferous,foraminifera, fragments of pelecypods, gastropods,and echinoderms. 20 404
Sand, very light gray to yellowish-gray, fine tocoarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose,glauconitic, micaceous, with abundant clay, lightolive gray, and foraminifera. 10 414
Sand, very light gray, mostly fine, somemedium to coarse grained, subangular to subrounded,quartzose, glauconitic, micaceous, with abundant clay,same, and foraminifera. 10 424
Sand, same, trace clay, with fragments of pelecypods,gastropods, and echinoderms, and trace limestone,very light gray, very finely crystalline. 10 434
Sand, same as 424-434, except very light to yellowishgray, fine to very coarse. 31 465
Sand, very light to yellowish-gray, fine to very coarse,subangular to subrounded, quartzose, glauconitic,with clay, light olive-gray, carbonaceous,some moderate reddish orange and shell fragments andforaminifera. 10 475
Sand, white to yellowish-gray, medium to very coarse,subangular to subrounded, quartzose, slightlyglauconitic, with limestone, very light gray, veryfinely crystalline, trace shell fragments, and traceforaminifera. 19 496
97
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 76
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Nanafalia Formation (continued)Sand, same, with abundant clay, light olive to light
brownish-gray, carbonaceous, micaceous. 10 506Sand, white to yellowish-gray, some pale yellowish-
orange, medium to very coarse, subangular to subrounded, quartzose, slightly glauconitic, with fragments of gastropods, bryozoans, pelecypods, and echinoderms. 10 516
Clayton Formation (By E-log at 512 ft; by samples at 516 ft) Limestone, yellowish-gray to pale orange, very finely
crystalline, sandy, slightly glauconitic, withbryozoan, pelecypod, gastropod, and echinodermfragments, foraminifera. 12 528
Clay, light olive-gray and moderate reddish-orange,micaceous, silty. 10 538
Limestone, same as 516-528. 22 560 Clay, same as 528-538, with sand and limestone, same. 10 570 Limestone, same. 21 591 Limestone, same, with clay, moderate reddish-orange. 9 600 Limestone, same. 23 623 Limestone, same, with clay, light olive-gray. 10 633 Limestone, same. 22 655 Sand, very light gray to white, medium to very coarse,
subangular to subrounded, quartzose, slightlyglauconitic, with limestone, same, and clay, lightolive-gray trace. 41 696
Providence Sand (Top at 670 ft from E-log)Limestone, yellowish-gray to very pale orange, very finely
crystalline, fossiliferous, foraminifera, ostracods,bryozoan, pelecypod, echinoderm fragments, with sand, same. 21 717
Limestone, same, except with trace fine sand, traceclay, brownish-gray, carbonaceous and fossils, trace. 20 737
Limestone, same as 696-717. 12 749 Sand, yellowish-gray to white, medium to very coarse,
subangular to subrounded, quartzose, slightlyglauconitic, with limestone, same. 61 810
Sand, same, some pale yellowish-gray, with some clay,light olive-gray, trace. 31 841
Sand, same, some pale yellowish-gray, some fine. 42 883 Limestone, very light gray to very pale orange, very
finely crystalline, slightly fossiliferous, shellfragments, microfossils, with sand, same; (limestoneis caved material from Clayton Formation). 10 893
Limestone, same, except light to light olive-gray. 11 904
98
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 76
Thickness Depth
_________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Ripley FormationSand/ very light gray to pale yellowish-orange, medium
to very coarse, subangular to subrounded,quartzose, slightly glauconitic with foraminifera,ostracods, shell fragments, with limestone, verylight gray, very finely crystalline. 83 987
Sand, same, with more limestone. 43 1030
99
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 79Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Well 10 Driller: Layne-Central Company Samples described by John C. Scott
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Lisbon FormationSand, moderate reddish-brown, fine to medium,
glauconitic, silty, iron stained, sparsely micaceous,loosely cemented, pale red-purple sparsely glauconiticclay. Glauconite occurs mainly as coating on claypieces. 42 42
Sand, moderate orange-pink, medium to coarse,sparsely glauconitic. Glauconite is deeplyweathered (light olive-green). 24 66
Tallahatta and Hatchetigbee FormationsClay, medium light gray, sandy, glauconitic (black
glauconite), light gray slightly calcareous sandysiltstone. Moderate reddish-brown silty clay.Yellowish-orange to yellowish-gray medium to coarseglauconitic sand. 29 95
Clay, medium gray, very fossiliferous (micro and macrofossils), calcareous, very glauconitic, slightlysandy. Most of the sample is composed of fossilsand glauconite. 32 127
Siltstone and calcareous sandstone, medium gray tomedium light gray, very fossiliferous, glauconitic.Fossil fragments abundant. 32 159
Tuscahoma Sand (135 ft from E-log)Clay, medium gray, silty, glauconitic fossiliferous,
slightly sandy. 63 222 Sand, medium light gray, medium to very coarse,
glauconitic. Some medium gray clay and light graycalcareous sandstone in sample. 32 254
Nanafalia Formation (270 ft from E-log)Clay, medium light gray, silty, carbonaceous. Light
gray, fine to medium glauconitic sand. Verylight gray to white calcareous glauconitic fossili ferous sandstone. Fossil fragments common. 31 285
Sand, greenish-gray, coarse to very coarse,glauconitic. Very light gray to white calcareousglauconitic sparsely fossiliferous sandstone. 31 316
Sand, greenish gray, glauconitic, fossiliferous,medium gray carbonaceous clay. Light gray towhite calcareous fossiliferous sandstone. 32 348
Sand, greenish-gray, fine to medium, silty,glauconitic, sparsely fossiliferous. 30 378
100
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 79
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Nanafalia Formation (continued)Sand, greenish-gray, medium to very coarse,
glauconitic, very fossiliferous. Light greenish-grayto white calcareous, glauconitic fossiliferous sandstone. 32 410
Sand, greenish-gray, coarse to very coarse, veryfossiliferous, carbonaceous; micro fossils and fossilfragments abundant. Very light gray to white calcareoussandstone. 31 441
Clayton FormationLimestone, yellowish-gray, very fossiliferous. Sample
composed mainly of fossils and fossil fragments. 62 503 Same as above except fossil content less. 32 535 Limestone, yellowish-gray, very fossiliferous, slightly
sandy; some carbonaceous material present. 30 565 Sand and calcareous sandstone, very light gray to white,
coarse to very coarse, fossiliferous, sparselyglauconitic. Yellowish-gray fossiliferous sandy limestone. 30 595
Providence Sand (590 ft from E-log)Sand, very pale orange to white, medium to very coarse,
sparsely fossiliferous (fossils may be fromlimestone and calcareous sandstone above). Small amountsof limestone and calcareous sandstone in sample. 32 627
Same as above except sand is mostly medium to coarse. 62 689 Sand, medium gray, moderate reddish-brown, pale red-purple,
and moderate yellow, fine to very coarse, veryclayey; a few fossil fragments present. Appear to be a"mish-mash" of reworked sediments. 31 721
Sand, medium light gray, medium to very coarse,very silty, calcareous, carbonaceous. Some calcareoussandstone and fossil fragments in sample. 62 783
Ripley Formation (790 ft from E-log)Same as above except sand is mostly fine to medium.
Some hard calcareous sandstone in sample. 31 813 Sand, light olive-gray, fine to medium, silty,
calcareous, micaceous, sparsely glauconitic. Someolive-gray clay and calcareous sandstone in sample. 33 846
Sand as above except sand is mostly fine andsample contains a few fossil fragments. 32 878
Sand, light olive-gray, very fine to finesilty, clayey, micaceous, calcareous, sparselyglauconitic, finely micaceous. 31 909
101
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 79
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Ripley Formation (continued)Clay, medium gray, very finely sandy calcareous, finely
micaceous. 93 1002 Clay, medium gray, sandy, sparsely micaceous, light gray,
medium to very coarse, silty sand. 31 1033 Sand, light gray, medium to very coarse, very
silty, clayey, calcareous, carbonaceous, sparselymicaceous. 22 1055
Sand, light gray, medium to coarse (some verycoarse), very silty, clayey, calcareous. 23 1078
Clay, medium gray to light gray, very finely sandy,calcareous, sparsely micaceous. 68 1146
102
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker Area Continued
Well 90 Owner: City of Dothan - Napier Field Well 4 Driller: Layne-Central Co.
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Brown sandy clay. 2 2 Red sandy clay. 26 28 Pink, yellow, white and tan mottled sandy clay. Mica noted. 19 47 Red, yellow, and gray clay with coarse grains and granules
of quartz. 18 65 Yellow-tan clay and medium to coarse quartz grains. 21 86 Reddish-brown clayey sand. Fine to coarse subangular sand. 21 107 Reddish-yellow clay and white coarse subangular
sand and granules of quartz. 25 132 White to milky fine to coarse subangular sand. Trace of
glauconite. 21 153 White, fine and medium subangular sand. 23 176 White and milky fine to coarse subangular glauconitic sand. 21 197 White and milky fine to coarse subangular glauconitic sand. 22 219 Greenish-white coarse subangular glauconitic sand. 24 243 Gray, hard arnaceous limestone, Glauconitic. 10 253 Gray, glauconitic sandy clay. 12 265 Gray, very fine micaceous sandy clay which contains
glauconite granules. 24 289 Gray, very fine micaceous sandy clay. Trace of glauconite. 22 311 Gray, very fine micaceous sandy clay. Trace of glauconite. 21 332 Gray, very fine micaceous sandy clay. Trace of glauconite. 21 353 Gray, very fine micaceous sandy clay. Trace of glauconite. 13 366 Greenish-white medium grained glauconitic subangular quartz
grains. 20 386 Greenish-white medium-grained glauconitic subangular quartz. 15 401 Greenish-white medium-grained glauconitic subangular quartz. 32 433 Milky and buff white fine, medium, and coarse subangular
quartz. Trace of gray clay. 7 440 Yellow, gray, and orange mottled clay with buff white fine
to coarse subangular quartz. 23 463 Yellow, gray, and orange mottled clay with buff white fine
to coarse subangular quartz. 21 484 Greenish-white fine to coarse subangular quartz.
Scattered particles of limey material. 19 503 Light tan-gray limey material and yellow fine and medium
subangular slightly glauconitic sand. 26 529 Yellow fine, medium and coarse subangular, slightlyglauconitic sand. Trace of tan limey material. 23 552
Buff white limestone. Trace of fine sand. 22 574 Buff white limestone. Trace of fine sand. 21 595 Buff white limestone. Trace of fine sand. 20 615 Buff white sandy limestone. 23 638 Milky and white medium grained subangular quartz. 21 659 Milky and white medium grained subangular quartz. 13 672
103
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 123Owner: Town of Coffee Springs - Well 2 Driller: Emmett Hughes Drilling Co. Samples described by John C. Scott (NOTE: Samples unwashed when described)
Thickness (ft)
Depth (ft)
No samplesSand, yellowish-gray, fine to very coarse,
loosely calcareous cemented fossiliferous, shellfragments common.
Sand, yellowish-gray, fine to medium,calcareous, fossiliferous.
No samples.Sand, light gray, fine, sparsely glauconitic. Sand, light gray, medium, glauconitic; shell
fragments rare.Sand, light gray, fine to medium, sparsely glauconitic, Sand, light gray, fine to coarse, glauconitic,
shell fragments rare.Sand, very light gray, fine to coarse, glauconitic. Sand, light gray, fine to coarse, glauconitic,
fossiliferous; shell fragments common; medium graysilty clay, rare.
Sand, medium gray, fine to medium, calcareous,finely glauconitic, fossiliferous.
Sand, light gray, fine to medium, calcareous,finely glauconitic, fossiliferous.
Sand, light gray, fine to medium, calcareous,sparsely glauconitic.
Tallahatta (?) FormationSand, medium gray, fine calcareous, clayey,
glauconitic, sparsely micaceous, fossiliferous. Sand, medium light gray, fine to medium,
calcareous, glauconitic, sparsely fossiliferous. Sand, medium gray, fine, very glauconitic
(fine grained glauconite). Clay, medium gray, finely sandy, calcareous, very
glauconitic, fossiliferous.
Bashi Marl Member (of some authors) Sand, medium gray, medium to coarse, calcareous, very glauconitic, fossiliferous.
Tuscahoma (?) SandClay, medium dark gray, very finely sandy, calcareous,
finely glauconitic, fossiliferous. Sand, medium gray, fine to medium, glauconitic,
sparsely, fossiliferous. Clay, medium gray, silty, sparsely, glauconitic.
130
10
106020
2010
2010
20
20
20
10
20
20
10
20
10
30
10110
130
140
150210230
250260
280290
310
330
350
360
380
400
410
430
440
470
480590
104
Table 2. Sample logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 123
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Tuscahoma SandSand, medium gray, medium to coarse silty,
glauconitic, slightly ferruginous. 10 600 Clay, medium gray, silty, sparsely glauconitic,
sparsely micaceous. 30 630 Clay, medium gray, silty, finely sandy, sparsely
glauconitic and micaceous. 40 670 Sand, medium light gray, medium to coarse,
very glauconitic. 50 720
Nanafalia (?) FormationSand, light gray, fine to medium, finely glauconitic. 10 730 Sand, medium light gray, medium to coarse, glauconitic. 10 740 Sand, medium gray, medium to coarse, glauconitic,
fossiliferous. 10 750 Sand, medium gray, fine, silty, glauconitic,
slightly ferruginous. 20 770 Sand, light gray, fine to medium, finely
glauconitic, slightly ferruginous. 10 780 Sand, medium light gray, medium to coarse,
very calcareous, sparsely glauconitic; very paleorange limestone. 10 790
105
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area
Owner: Town of Abbeville - Well 4
ClaySand and clay streaksRockClaySand and clay streaksSand and clay ballsClaySandy clayRockSoft limeRockClay and limeRockClayRockClayRockSandRockSand and clayClayClaySandSandLimeLimeLimeLimerockSandLimerockLimerockLimeLime
Well 1 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
1511
147
155
2753
1420
16423242
4112853
501
573648
12386
Depth (ft)
15262731385358859093
107127128192194197199203205246258266271274324325382418422430442480486
106
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 2 Owner: Town of Abbeville - Well 2 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness Depth
_____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Sandy clay 23 23Sand 8 31Hard clay 16 47Sand 21 68Clay and sand streaks 15 83Clay 15 98Rock 1 99Clay 1 100Rock 4 104Limestone 61 165Hard shale 42 207Rock 1 208Shale 2 210Rock 1 211Hard shale 10 221Sand 5 226Shale 12 238Red sandy, draggy 10 248Gray clay streaks lime rock 85 333Soft gray lime rock 56 389Hard lime rock 33 422Hard lime rock 73 495
107
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 3 Owner: Town of Abbe vi lie - Well 5 Driller:
Red clayRed clay and sand streaksRed sand with clay streaksYellow sandy clayClay RockClay and lime rock streaksSandy claySoft black shaleBlue claySandBlue sand and soft shaleBlue clay and lime rock streaksPacked sandClay and blue shalePacked sand with rock breaksClay and shaleHard white lime rockClayHard and soft lime with sand and clayLime rock with blue clayPacked fine sand with lime streaks
Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
109
351812
124132967182133272
303
1681
1148
166
Depth (ft)
101954728485
109122151218236257290317319349352520521532580746
108
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 4 Owner: Town of Abbeville - Well 3 Driller:
Red sandy clayFine sandClayRockClayClayFine sandClaySandClayRockClayRockClayRockSandy shaleRockShaleSandy shaleShaleRock and soft streaksCoarse green sandCoarse green sandShaleRockSandy shaleRockSandy shaleRockHard shaleCoarse sandCoarse sandShaleSand, fineSandSand and clay streaksSand and clay streaksLime rock
Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
221392
1465
102715111
102
2222667
14644
162
121
138
231112232212
134
Depth (ft)
223544466066718183909196979899
109111133155221228242248252256272274286287300308331342354377399411545
109
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 6 Owner: Dale Co. Water & Fire Driller:
Protection Authority (Bertha Well)
ClayClaySandSandSandSandClayMarlMarlMarlMarlMarlRock and sandRockMarlMarlMarlRockMarlMarlSandRockMarlSandGumboSandSandMarlSandMarlLimeMarlLimestoneLimestoneLimestoneLimestoneSandRockSandRockRockRockRockRockMarl and rock
South Well and Supply
Thickness (ft)
2010101520202020252020581
13851
191741
1315214
1712
10105
2017136512167133
Co.
Depth (ft)
203040557595
115135160180200205213214227235240241260277281282295310331335352353355365375380400417430436441442444445451458459462465
110
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 6
Rock and marlMarlRockMarl and rockRockRock and marlRockRockMarlRockMarlRockMarlRockMarlRockRockRockMarlRockMarlRockMarlMarlMarlRockSandMarlRockRockMarlMarlRockRock and sandSandRock and sandstoneSandRock and sandSandRock and sandSandRock and sandSandRockSandRock
Thickness (ft)
21252
13622923
11151315151395
15211421711
15342658593221
Depth (ft)
467468470475477490496498500509511514525526531532535536541542547548551560565580601615617618625626627642645649651657662670675684687689691692
111
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 6
Thickness Depth
_______________________________________ _ _ ___________(ft) (ft)
Sand 3 695Rock and sand 6 701Sand 4 705Rock 1 706Sandstone 9 715Sandstone 10 725Rock 1 726Sand 5 731Rock and sand 14 745Sand 10 755Rock and sand 10 765Rock 1 766Marl 1 767
112
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner;
SandClay,ClayClay,ClayClay,MarlSand,RockClay,Rock,Marl,RockMarl,RockMarl,Sand,
Well 7 : Dale Co. Board of Education Driller: George W. Long High School
sandy
sandy
light blue1
red and clay balls
whitewhitesoft,
soft,
soft,coarse
to greenish limesandy
sandy
sandy, with lignite breaks
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
1115173372
30190.513
150.5
700.53
46
Depth (ft)
112643768385
115134134.135138153153.223223.226272
5
5
5
113
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Ariton - Well 3
Red claySandy clayBlue sandy clayHard lime rockShaleRed sandy clayBlack clayBlack claySandSand and clayClayClayClay with rock streaksClay shellsClay shellsClay, rock and sand streaksClayClay and shellSandy clay and shellsSandShaleRockShaleShaleLime rockLime and clayLime rock - small clay streaksLime rockLime rockSandSandLime and sandSand and limeSand and limeHard lime rockHard lime rockSand and clay lime breaksSand and clay lime breaksRockSand and clay lime breaksSand and clay lime breaksRockSand and clay lime breaksSand and clay lime breaksSand and shale, rock breaks hardSand and shale, rock breaks hard
Well 11 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
1015162
2442275
1122856
1211121768
1411
110698
22221762
21231391
2123
12110
111222323
Depth (ft)
1025414367
109136141152174182187193205216228245251259273284285295301310318340362379385387408431444453454475498499520530531542564587610
114
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army Fort Rucker Old Tabernacle Field
Well 16 Driller: Hughes and Son Well Drilling
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Red claySandClaySandYellow claySandSandy marlSandMarlGray rockFine gray sandMarlGray rockMarlSandMarlRockMarlSandMarlSandMarlSandMarlSandMarlSandRockMarlSandGray rockMarlSandMarlSandRockMarlRockMarlCoarse white sandLimestone
23148
319566
324
125197
112494
16223812106
1817
112
15108
12172
101535
23374576859096102134138150155156165172183185189198202218240278290300306324325332343345360370378390391398400410425460
115
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Ozark - Well 5
Red clayYellow sandClay and rock breaksSandy claySandy shaleClay and shaleSand and clay breaksClay and sand breaksLime rockSand and clay breaksRockClayRockClay and rock breaksRock hardSand clay and rock breaksClaySandy clayClayLime clay and sandLime and clay breaksLimeHard and soft limeSandy hard limeHard limeClay and lime breaksRockClayRockClay and rockClay and sand breaksClay hardClay and lime rockHard limeClayHard limeClayLime and clayBrown lime and sandSand and limeClay sand and limeBrown sand and limeBrown sand and lime breaksBrown sand and lime breaksBrown sand and lime breaks
Well 19 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
122
2830102229323
2822144
43101210145020602034293628
14164220938
1016202020202015
Depth (ft)
1214427282
104133165168196198200201205209252262274284298348368428448482511514520522530544560602622631634642652668688708728748768783
116
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 19
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Lime clay and sand breaks 5 788Lime clay and sand breaks 12 800Sand 8 808Clay and sand breaks 14 822Hard clay 29 851Sandy clay 7 858Hard blue clay 50 908
117
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Ozark - Well 4
Top soilRed sandy clayClaySandSandy shaleRockClayRockSandy shaleSandSandRockSand and lime breaksSand and rockRockSandRockClaySand and rockRockClay and rockPacked sandLimeLimeLimeLimeLimeLime and sandRockClayRockClay and limeLime and claySand and limeSand and limeSand and limeSandSandSandClay
Well 22 Driller: Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
1284
4253
151
857
214
2040
171
221525
191823222324879
351
44571423131022158
Depth (ft)
1293375128129134135220227248252272312313320321343358360365384402425447470494581590625626670727741764111787809824832
118
Table 3. Driller *s logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Ozark - Well 2
Sand , redClay, softClay, hardRockClaySand, greenClay, sand breaksClay, sandy; rock breaksSand, rock breaksSand , packedLime s tone , sandyLimestoneSand , packedSand, packed; limestone breaksLimestone; sandyLime s tone , hardLimestone, sandyLimestone, hardLimestoneRockLime s tone , sandyLime s tone , hardClay, hard; limestone breaksClayLime s tone , hardSand; limestone breaksSandRock and sand breaksSand , brownSand; small breaks limestoneLimestoneLimestone; sand breaksNo record
Well 23 Driller: Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
4010372
9140167410201215401330105
1211
12190207711138
215151
151
Depth (ft)
40508789
180220236310320340352367407420450460465477488489510600620697708721729750801806807822823
119
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Ozark - Well 1
Sand, orangeSandy clay, brownWhite sand, coarseWhite sand, coarseShale, dark gray, fossiliferousRock, shell fragmentsSandy shale, glauconitic, grayRockShaleShale and sandy streaksRockHard shaleRockShaleRockGreen sand, rock breaksGreen sand, rock breaksGreen sand, rock breaksRock and sand breaksSand and rock breaksRock and sand breaksSandy shale and rock breaksShale and rock breaksHard limeSoft limeLime , grayLime and sandSandy limeLimeSand and lime breaksLimeHard limeHard lime and sandy shale breaksLime with hard shale breaksLimeHard limeShale and lime breaksHard lime, sandy shale breaksHard limeSandClayHard limeLime marl and sand breaksSandSand and small breaksRockSand, rock breaksClay
Well 24 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
21151135433
263
12162
20151
1011208
176
28463110911667
1812301115128
5320232
1510512435
1194
Depth (ft)
21364782
125128154157169185187207208213214224235255263280286314360391401492508514521539551581592607619627680700723725740750801925860861880884
123
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: James Golden
ChalkSandSand, clayClaySandRed claySand, chalkMarlRockMarlRockMarlRockSandRockSandMarlRockMarlSandRockSandRockSand and rockRockRock and marlSandSand and marlRockSandy marlSandMarlLimestoneSandLime s toneRockSandRockSandRockRock and clay
Well 28 Driller: Smith Well and Supply
Thickness (ft)
151010132
10108131
111
131
2120
1111
451.6
2210393846
1028
10100101082
1020
Company
Depth (ft)
15253548506070787982839495
108109130150151262266271272278300310349352360364370380382390400500510520528530540560
121
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 29 Owner: John Solomon Driller:
ClayCoarse sand, dryUnconsolidated chalk and gravelFine sand, yellow, waterCoarse sandMarl, little rockySandClaySand, yellow, very clean in places, few streaks
green marl in this areaSand, marlRock and marlBlue marl with few rocks, toughGray rockGray rocky marlHard rock and tough marlGray rockHard rockSofter rockHard rockMarl, few streaks rockTough marl and rockMarlGreen sandRockSandstone with rock streaksMarl, few rocksMarl, more rockSand, grayRockSand, marl whiteRockWhite sandy marlRocky white sandRockCoarse sandClay ton limestoneHarder limestoneSoft streaksHard limestoneMostly hard - some sand showed hereVery hard limestone with sand grains embeddedRocky sandClean sand, coarseHard rock
122
Smith Well and Supply
Thickness (ft)
1822102015123
15and
4523
131210108252
33404520
13430581114
152
137028
2020101033
Company
Depth (ft)
184050708597100115
160162165178190200210218220225227260300345365366400430435443444445446450465467480550552560580600610620623626
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 29
Thickness Depth
____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Clean sand and rock 12 638Hard rock 1 639Sand, clean 9 648Hard rock 1 649Clean sand, medium coarse 31 680Sand, not so clean 10 690 Little marl
123
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 30Owner: Town of Newville - Well 2 Driller: Tom Smith Artesian Well Co.
Thickness Depth
_________________________________________ ___________(ft) (ft)
Clay 10 10Sandy clay 15 25Sand 25 50Rock 50 100Shale 81 181Rock and sand 24 205Shale 67 272Sandy shale 28 300Rocky shale with sand 47 347Rock 3 350Rock and shale with sand 34 384Sand 31 415Limey sand 35 450Rock 6 456Sandy lime 116 572
124
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 32 Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Driller: Buie Drilling Company
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Clay 20 20Sandy clay 20 40Coarse sand 60 100Sand with rock 10 110Soft sandy rock 10 120Light blue marl 30 150Blue marl 140 290
125
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 33 Owner: Faulkner Farms, Inc. Driller:
ClayCoarse sandGravelCoarse sand and chalkYellow sandPink sandMarl (green)Sandy blue marlSandSoft rock and sandBlue marlBlack pepper sandGray rock (soft)Hard rockGray rock and sandBlue marlSandy marlRockSandy marlMarlSandy marlCoarse green sandCoarse green sand, some rock scatteredGreen sand and gray rockHard rockGray rock and green sandHard rockSandy marlHard rockSandy marlSoft marlRock marlCoarse green sandRockGray sand (coarse)White lime rockPretty solid rockSofter rockMore solidHarderHard rockDrilled as sandstone, sampled as medium sandHard rockSoft sand, getting coarser here
Smith Well and Supply
Thickness (ft)
18146
2022155
151715103
232
103711
1111516162114
181
101
10101288
17207
284795
1723
Company
Depth (ft)
183238588095100115132147157160185187197234245246257272288304325339340348349359360370380392400408425445452480527536541558560563
126
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 33
Thickness Depth
_____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Rock, hard, little softer bottom few feet 7 570 Sand, softer, washed out, not very clean or coarse,
had a soft feel, maybe a little clay 7 577Hard rock 1 578 Softer rock, sampled as clean rock possibly porous,
not very much sand 6 584Hard rock 2 586Softer, sampled as clean rock and sand 14 600Sand, mushy, some marl here, providence started here 20 620Rocky sand, sampled as clean sand medium 10 630Hard rock, sampled as clean sand medium 2 632Soft, sampled as clean sand medium 1 633Hard rock 1 634Softer as sandstone, sampled as clean coarse sand 6 640Medium hard, sampled as good clean coarse providence sand 6 646Hard, sampled as good clean coarse providence sand 1 647Medium sand, sampled as good clean coarse providence sand 13 660Harder, sampled as clean coarse sand, streaks of rock 20 680 Same as above except last 2 ft very hard, possible gumbomarl and rock 20 700
Sand and rock 25 725Marl 11 736
127
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 34Owner: Alabama Highway Department Driller: Alabama Highway Department ________(U.S. Highway 231 Rest Area)______________________________________
Thickness Depth
_____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Brown sand clay 1 1Fine brown moist sand 5 6Red and gray clay 2 8Brown sand, medium to fine 1 9Tan coarse sand 23 32Red coarse sand 1 33Red and gray clay 1 34Brown coarse sand 11 45Red and gray clay 1 46Brown coarse sand 7 53REd and gray clay 1 54Brown coarse sand with thin layers of red and gray clay 12 66 Brown coarse sand with thin layers of gray sand clay and
thin layers of red and gray clay 7 73Brown coarse sand 3 76Brown coarse sand with thin hard layers of dark gray sand clay 5 81Hard gray sandrock 1 82Dark gray sand clay with very thin layers of gray sand clay 4 86Hard gray sandrock 1 87 Hard dark gray sand clay with very thin layers dark gray fine
sand 8 95Hard dark gray sand clay 22 117 Hard wet dark gray sand clay with thin layers dark gray
fine sand 4 121Hard gray sandrock 1 122Hard wet gray sand clay with thin layers gray sandrock 24 146Medium wet dark gray sand clay with hard layers 22 168Hard wet dark gray sand clay with hard layers of gray sandstone 1 169 Medium wet dark gray sand clay with very thin layers of
gray sandrock 14 183Hard wet dark gray sand clay with thin layers of gray sandstone 8 191Hard wet dark gray sand clay 35 226Dense wet gray sand, with very thin layers of gray sandrock 17 243Hard gray calcareous sandrock with very thin layers of sand 5 248Dense wet gray sand 3 251Hard wet gray calcareous sandrock with very thin layers of sand 3 254Dense wet gray sand 1 255Hard gray calcareous sandrock with very thin layers of sand 3 258Dense gray sand with very think layers of calcareous sandrock 12 270 Hard gray rock
128
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 35 Owner: U.S. Geological Survey Driller:
Dale County Observation Well 1
SandChalkSand and chalk in streaksChalkHard marlHard marl with, soft streaksHard marlRockMarl and streaks of blue sandBlue sandHard rockSandRockChoppy rock and sandHard rockChoppy sandRockSandHard rockSandHard rockSandMarlHard rockSandy marlRock and sandRock and sandSoft marlSoft marlRock, choppy and not too hardSoft marlSoft marl, drilled like sandRock and marl in streaksSand, rock and marl streaksHard, choppy, gray rockHard gray rock and streaks of sandGray rockCoarse sandSand and something that resembled black coalSoft marlRock, white limeFine sand, dirtySameWhite chalkLimestone with some clay
129
Smith Well and Supply
Thickness (ft)
301020203010100.59.55142
181827111
1252
10235
101973
10377
2320519
10106
10
Company
Depth (ft)
30406080
110120130130.5140145146150152170171179181188189190191203208210220222225230240241250257260270273280287310330381390400410416426
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 35
Thickness (ft)
Depth (ft)
Lime s tone, harderMedium sand, cleanHard rockHard rockSandHard rockRockSandRockRockSandHard rockMarlMarl with streaks of rockRock and sandRockSandMarlRock and sand
71853
11129864
1066
145915
433451456459470471473482490496500510516522536541550551556
130
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Ozark - Well 3
SandSandy clayClayLimeSandy clayClayClay and limeRockSandy claySandSand and lime rockLimeSandy clay and limeSandy clayLime and sandLimeSandy claySandLimestoneLimeLimerockLimestoneClayLimestoneClay and limeLimeLimestone and claySandLimestoneSandLimestoneSandSandy limeSandSand and limeSand and limeLimestone
Well 37 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
3010167
305181
763829241736124
142370903
4564
568
6953244
6913331013
Depth (ft)
3040566393144152153229267296320337373385389403426496586589634640644700708777782785787791795864877910920933
131
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Ozark - Well 6
Top soilYellow sandRed claySandy clayBlue clayRockClayRockSandLime breaksSand, lime and clay streaksClay and lime streaksClay and sand streaksLime coarseLime and sandLime and sandLime and sandLime and sand, hardLime and sandLime and sandLime and sand, hardLime and sand, hardLime and sand, hardLime and sandSand clay and limeBrown sand lime and clay streaksLime sand and clay streaksClay lime and sand streaksLime rockClay and lime breaksLime rockClay and lime breaksLime rockSand and lime, hardSand and lime, hardSand and lime, hardSand and lime, hardLime breaks and sandLime breaks and sandRockClay and rock breaks
Well 38 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
17
1235483
961
163
312780203131312755
26321219323132292
253
173
1531317
2565
21
Depth (ft)
18
2055
103106202203219222253280360380411442473500505510536568580599631662694723725750753770773788819850857882888893914
132
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Wildlife Area
Sand and claySand and claySoaps toneSoaps tone and claySoaps tone and rockSoap stone and sandSoaps toneDark coarse sandSoaps toneSoaps tone and rockSoaps tone and rockSoapstone and rockSoaps tone and rockSoapstone and rockSoapstone and rockSoapstone and rockSoapstone and rockSoapstone and rockRockRock and sandCoarse sandCoarse sandGreen sandGreen sandGreen sandGreen sand and shell
Well 42 Driller: Carroll Hardware, Inc.
Thickness (ft)
1010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010
Depth (ft)
102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260
133
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Alabama National Guard
Sandy clayFine sandYellow clayBlue marlRock softRockMarlRockMarlMarlSandSand, rock streaksSandRock with sand breaksSandSandRockSandRockSandRockSandRockSandMarlSandSandy marl
Well 45 Driller: Smith Well and Supply
Thickness (ft)
307
153441.51.52
3343295578
10131
25134
173
1210
Company
Depth (ft)
303752869091.59395
128171200205210217225235236239240265266269273290293305315
134
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Lowe Field
SandClayClay, red, sandySands tone , hardSandstone, softClay, sandyRock, softRock , hardSandRockClay, sandyRockClayRockSand, greenRock, softSand, greenRock and sand streaksSand, greenSandRockClayRockSandRockClay, sandyRock and clay streaksClay, sandy; rock breaksLimestoneClay, sandyLimestoneLimestone, softLime s tone , ha r dLime s tone , s of tRock , hardLime s tone , sandyRockLime s tone , softRock, hard and soft streaksLimestone, hardSand, rock breaksRockSandRockSandRockClay, blue, tough
Well 46 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
78
416
15216823
282
7414353
32214223
123
43117
112692510762
1225331234141
10
Depth (ft)
71556627798104112114117145147221222226229234237269271272276278280283295298341352359471540565575582588590602627660672675679680684685695
135
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Well 7
Red sandBlue clayHard rock and lime streaksBlue clayHard sandRockHard sandRockHard sandRockHard sandRockSand and rock breaksRockClayRockSand and limeSoft limeSoft limeSoft limeSoft limeSoft limeHard limeHard limeSandy soft limeLime and sand hard breaksLime and sand hard breaksLime and sand hard breaksLime and sandClaySand and lime rockSand and lime rockSand and lime rockSand and lime rockSand and lime rockSandy clayClaySandy clay rock breaksHard clay rock breaksHard clay
Well 47 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
513610
11029
116
1112
142
514
142
24313231312665
253232311026273231323132742520
100
Depth (ft)
518797
20723623725325426526728128333433835235437840944147250352953554056559762966067069672375578681884988195598010001100
136
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Shell Field
Sand, streaks clayClay, sandy with streaks sandMarl, blueRock breakShaleMarl, blueSandRockShaleRockShale , sandyRockLimestone, soft and sandRockShale , sandyShaleShale, sandySandRockShale and rocksShaleRockShaleRockShale and limestoneRockShale and limestoneRockLimestone and sandRockSand and limestoneRockSand and shellrockLime s tone , hardSand, limey, with black streaksLimestone, hardSand , limeySand, packed; colors mud blackRockSand, packed; colors mud blackClay and limestoneLimestone, softLime s tone , sandyRockLime s tone , softRock , hardLimestoneLimestone, hardLimes tone , sandy
Well 49 Driller: Acme Drilling Company
Thickness (ft)
862114-
211857
371
102375
2064
1218
11121
1743192
172
272922
152
183462
4436
37
,0-, 10
Depth (ft)
86107121-
142160165172209210312315322327347353357369370378389390392393410414417418427429446448475477486488490505507525528532538540584587593630640
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 50 Owner: Town of New Brockton - Well 2 Driller:
Top soilClaySandClayRockClaySandLime rockLime rock and sandClayRockClayClayLime rockClayClayClay and limerockClayClayClay, limerockClay, limerockLimestoneLimestoneLime s tone
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
2177
1003
69653
1121
10155
252212112322157
2322
Depth (ft)
21926
126129198204209212324325335350355380402414425448470485492515537
138
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 51 Owner: Town of New Brockton - Well 3 Driller:
ClayRed clayBlue clayRed clayLime rockSand and shellsSoaps toneLimeSoaps toneSandGreen sandSand and pepper sandRockSandy claySandClaySandCemented sandSandy claySandSandy claySand and clayRock and sandy claySand and clayClay, sand and limeSandSand and limeSand and limeRockLimeRockLimeLimeLimeRock
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
25724
1528
633
905
16332
21735
2212174
208
16104
1913262
952
182
Depth (ft)
2597
101116118126189192282287303336338359366369374396408425429449457473483487506519521527529624626644646
139
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 52 Owner: Town of New Brockton - Well 1 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness Depth
_____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Red clay 26 26White clay 54 80CLay 3 83Red clay 39 122Clay 4 126Sands tone 2 128Sand clay 9 137Hard rock 1 138Soapstone 60 198Sand 6 204Clay 6 210Rock 2 212Hard sand 6 218Soapstone 29 247Rock 1 248Soapstone 13 261Rock 1 262Clay 50 312Sands tone 2 314Soapstone 11 325Water-bearing sand 33 358
140
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Goodman
Top soilSandy clayClaySandSandSandSandGray claySandRockSand with streaks of claySandClaySand and streaks of clayRockLime with streaks of sandRockSoft shaleClaySand shaleClayRockClayRockClayMarl and rock streaksRockSand, draggySandMarl, sandyRockShaleRockShale, sandyGumboRockShale, sandyRockSandSandRockClay, sandyLimeLime, softLime , hard
Well 55 Driller: Acme Drilling Company
Thickness (ft)
4122
82337
202082
2042
111
1228
1010
1151
231
110134
13451316
142
102
12324432
Depth (ft)
41618
100133140160180188190210214216227228240242250260270385386409410520533537550554559560563564570584586596598610613615619623626628
141
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 55
SandRockShale, sandyRockMarlSandRockSandRockRockLime, softLimeLimeLime , hardClay
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
4272
14334233
8585605
632634641643657660663667669672675760845905910
142
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Enterprise
Sandy claySandSandy clayClaySandy claySand and claySand and rockClaySand clayRockClaySandRockClayRockSandSandy clayClayRockClaySandClaySandSandClay and rockSandSand rockSandy clayClaySandy clayRockSandClay and rockClayRockSandy claySand and rockSandy clayRockSandy clayRockSandRock and sandSandy limestoneSand
Well 56 - Well 4 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
15105025107
151038
4541448
1232
1167
1610156
215
13752
1074676
114
15258
187
Depth (ft)
152575
100110117132142145153198202203207211219231263264280287303313328334355360373380385387397404408414421427438442457459464472490497
143
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 56
Thickness (ft)
Depth (ft)
SandRockSand and limestoneLimestoneLimestoneLimestoneSandSandLimestone and sandSandLimestoneSandLimestoneSandLimestoneSandLimestoneSandLimestone and sand
72
13234678143
166
174333917
20
504506519542588666680683699705722726729732735744745752772
144
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 57 Owner: City of Enterprise - Well 7 Driller:
Top soilRed claySandy red clayTough claySandy clay, graySoft sandHard clay, sand and limeSand, gray, salt and pepperLime rockSandSandy limeClaySand, blackRockSandy clayLimeClayRockClay and lime, sandyHard clayHard rockClaySandy clayLime rockHard clay, sandyLimeHard rock, green sand with lime and clayHard rock sand, greenHard rockLime and clayHard pack sand with lime and little clayLime rockSand, clay and rock breaksClay, sand and limeHard clayLimeSand with lime and clayClayLime and clayLime rockLime and clayHard limeLime and clayRockClay with lime
145
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
18
962
111011522
1335413431
17372
3212
1102
2317
17
1424
2021936251
111
10
Depth (ft)
19
105107118128139144146148161196200201204208211212229266268300312313323325348365366373387389393413415416425428434436441442453454464
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 57
Hard rockClay and limeLimeSandy lime, with clayHard rockSandy limeHard rockSandy limeSandy limeSandy limeLime and clayLime and c layWhite lime, little white clayWhite lime, little white clayWhite lime, little white clayWhite lime, little white clay, harderWhite lime with white clay, hardHard limeWhite lime with clayWhite lime with clayHard limeWhite lime, hard streaksSandSandHard lime, soft streaks, little clayHard lime, soft breaks, sandy and claySandSandLime and sand, little clayHard limeSand and lime breaksHard limeSandHard lime with clayHard lime with clayLime and clay breaksLime with clayLime and clay, harderLime and clay, hard
Thickness (ft)
192
13141
11236
17149
2222239
11361
1143
181845
111653
1519179
2323
Depth (ft)
465474476489490494495506529535552566575597619642651662665671672683687690708726730735746747753758761776795812821844867
146
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Enterprise
Top soilSandy clayHard claySandSandy claySandClayHard claySandy clayHard clay and rockRockHard clay and rockRockHard clay and sandy streaksHard shale and limeGreen sand and clay streaksGreen sand and clay streaksGreen sand and clay streaksHard shaleGreen sand and clay streaksRockGray sand and limeLime rockFine sand and limeRockSandy shaleRockSandy shaleLime rock and sand streaksSand and limeLime rock and sand streaksSand and limeHard rockSand and limeSand and lime ligniteLimeLimeLime cut betterLimeLimeRockSandRockSandRock
Well 58 Well 5 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
13
21594
101487
543
462
20761923208
143
2889171876
15112
132818232323269
14621
Depth (ft)
14
25848898
112120127181184230232252328347370390398412415443451460461468469477484490505516518531559577600623646672681695701703704
147
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 58
Thickness Depth
____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Sand 8 712Rock 1 713Sand 1 714Rock 17 731Sand 9 740Rock 3 743Sand and rock 7 750Sand 11 761Sand 4 765Rock 1 766Sand and rock 11 777Hard lime 23 800
148
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 59 Owner: City of Enterprise - Well 1 Driller:
ClaySandy clayCoarse sandSoft clay, Rock 6 in.Fine blue sandRockShaleRockShaleRockShaleRock and breaksShaleRockHard cemented sandRockHard sand and limeRockShale and limeShale and limeRockClayLime, shale and bouldersRockShale and bouldersGreen sandBouldersGreen sandRockGreen sandHard rockGreen sandRockGreen sandRockGreen sandRockStreaks coarse sand and bouldersFine hard sandRockSand and shaleRockSand and shaleRockCoarse sand
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
153920145121114423
11132
3222252
1060
1153
30142
231
15174
111891
151
1182
Depth (ft)
15547488939496979899103107109112123136138170192217219229289290305308338352354377378393394401405416417425434435450451462470472
149
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 59
Thickness (ft)
Depth (ft)
RockSand and limeSand and limeHard rockPack sandPack sand, fineLime, softSoft limeHard limeHard fine sandHard fine sandShale and limeFine pack sandRockSand and rock breaksLime rock
118182
231281449
267
2161
2912
473491509511534546627671680706713734740741770782
150
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Enterprise
ClaySand and clay streaksSand and gravelClaySandClayRockClayClayRockHard claySandRockSandy clayClayRockClayRockShaleLime rockSandRockShaleRockShaleRockShale and limeRockShaleSandShaleSandRockSandRockSandRockSandShaleSandRockSandRockShale and rockShale and rock
Well 60 - Well 3 Driller: Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
122864
2794252442751
1116
204131
451
372
547
1912
141
222636-
732
10
Depth (ft)
12404650778690929799
103107109116121122133134140160164165168169214215252254308315334346347351352374376382385391-
398401403413
151
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 60
RockSand and rockRockSandRockSandRockShaleRockSandRockShaleShale and rockShaleRockSandRockSand and limeRock ( lime )Sand and limeRockSand and rockRockShale and limeRockSand, lime and ligniteLimeRockSand and limeRockSand and limeLimeRockLime and rockSand and limeRockLime and rockSandRockSandRockSandRockSandRockSandRockSandLime hard
Thickness (ft)
251219161714532213
13629142
40123
5163
121823913622121414-
216
Depth (ft)
415420421423424433434440441448449453458461463465466469482488490499500504506546669674690693705723725728737738741747749751752754755759760764-
766782
152
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 62 Owner: City of Enterprise - Well 8 Driller:
Red clayMulti colored claySand with clayRockGray sandy claySand lime shells-clayHard claySandy clayRockBlack claySandSand rock-clay streaksClayRockFine sand with clayClay and shaleSand with clayRockHard clay-sandyHard sand some clayRockHard sandRockHard packed sandSoft rockHard sandLime rockHard packed sandRockHard packed sandLime rockHard packed sandHard claySand with clayRockSand with clayRockSandSand with clayRockSandy clayLime rockSandLime rockSand
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
1014
1021
1925867
33111038
352381
5722251
182
128
1315382518114133233
Depth (ft)
1024
126127146171179185192225236246249257292315323324381403405410411429431443451464465470473481483488489497498499503504507510512515518
153
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 62
Lime rockSand with clayRockSandy lime and clayHard lime-shellsSandLime, clay, shellsHard limeSandSandy claySandSand lime shells clay black muckSand, shale black muckHard clayLight gray limeLight gray limeLight gray limeLight gray limeSoft gray lime with claySoft gray lime with clayHard limeHard lime with clayHard packed sandHard packed sandHard limeSoft lime with clayHard lime , sandyClay with lime and sandClay with lime and sandHard lime, sandy clayHard lime, clayHard lime with clayHard lime with clay
Thickness (ft)
52159681542
2319121422231210212
148544
10234
1620208
Depth (ft)
523525526531540546554555560564566589608620634656679691701722724738746751755759769792796812832852860
154
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Macedonia Water System
Red sandy clayPink sandRed sandSandBlue clayHard rockSand with clay breaksBlue claySand and clayHard rockClayRockClayClay with sand breaksSand with lime breaksSandHard rockRock with sand breaksClay with sand breaksRockClay and sandSand lime and claySand and limeRockSand and limeSand and limeLime and clay breaksSoft white limeLimeLimeLimeLimeSand with lime breaksRockLime with sand breaksLime with sand breaksRockLimeSand with lime breaksSand clay limeSand lime claySand lime clay
Well 64 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
121410
11041117642
232
472020
1311731
18
2282
322631302931191011
123102
1932323132
Depth (ft)
122636
146187198205211215217240242289309329330361378409410418440448450482508539569598629648658669670693703705724756788819851
155
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Well 1
Sandy clayShaleRockShaleSandy shaleShaleSandRockSandRockSandRockSandHard lime rockSandFine sand and limeSandy shaleRockFine sandRockSandRockSandLimeLime and hard rockHard rockSandHard rockSandRockSandSand and limeHard rockSandRock and sand breaksHard rock
Well 65 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
113489
1274275
211
171789
2139236
101
14826314203
1016
391711154
Depth (ft)
1145536274
148175180201202219220227235244265304306309315325326340422485498518521531532538577594605620624
156
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Well 2
ClaySandy shaleSoft rockShaleSandy shaleRockShaleSand and shaleRockShaleRockShaleClaySand , rockSand (draggy)Sand (packed, but better)Sand, cut goodRockSand and shaleRockSandy shaleSandSandRockSandSandRockSandSoft rockSand (draggy)Sandy shale and limestoneLime rockSoft limestoneHard lime rockSandRockSandLimestoneSandSand, streaks of limestoneSandRockLimestoneClaySand
Well 66 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
2078
2510116
342
301
122
13373918
118
1111442442
102
1896354
23193722921
5652
Depth (ft)
20273560708187
121123153154166168181218257275276294295306320324326330334336346348366462497501524543546553555557566568569625630632
157
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 66
Thickness Depth
_____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Rock 2 634Sand 15 649Rock 1 650Clay 21 671Rock 3 674Sand 5 679Rock 1 680
158
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Well 3
SandShaleSandLimeSoft rockShaleLimeSandy shaleRockShaleSandy shaleLime rockShaleShady shaleGreen sandRockGreen sandHard shaleSandRockSandRockSand and shaleShaleRockShaleRockSand and shaleRockSandRockSand , rockSandLime rockSand , rockSandRockSandRockSand , rockSand, streaks shale and limestoneSand, shale and limeLime rockSoft limeLime
Well 67 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
18101946
1710101110332
466
402
205
14212
1020
1514181353622822
6643152810
Depth (ft)
1828475157748494
105115148150196202242244264269283285286288298318319324325329330338339342347350356358360368370372438481496524534
159
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 67
Lime rockSandRockSandLime rockLime rockSand and lime rockSand streaked with lime rockRockLimestoneShaleRockLime, rockSand, rockSand, rock
Thickness (ft)
Depth (ft)
151835
105
18223
17514
113
549567570575585590608630633650655656660671674
160
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Well 5
Sandy clayBrown sandClayBrown sandSandy claySandy shaleRockSandy shaleRockShaleShale, sand breaksGreen sandSandy shaleLime rockSandy shaleRockSandy shaleRockShale rock breaksRock and limeShaleRockShaleRockSandy shaleRockShaleRockSandLime rockRockLime rockHard rockSandHard rockSand, rock breaksSand, shale, and rock breaksSand and lime
Well 68 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
10349
26451018
165119
703
10252
1724161
1412
1315
1112
4313204
472726
Depth (ft)
101317265297
107125126191202211281284294296301303320322326327333334348349351364379490492535548568572619646672
161
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Array - Fort Rucker Well 4
Sandy shaleSoft claySoaps toneStreaks of sand and claySandSandy clayMuddy sandRockSandy shaleSandy shaleLime rockSand and shaleShaleRockSand and shaleSandRockSandRockSandRock with breaksSandRockSandRock with breaksSand (draggy)RockSandRockSand and shaleRockSand (draggy)RockSand and shaleRockShaleRockCoarse sandLime rockLime rocks, sand breaks, goodLimestone, softLime rock, sand breaksHard rockSandHard rock
Well 69 Driller: Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
9154
1886
102
1720123438
12039
1293964175
10562
1824145914
1516
1022515193
Depth (ft)
92428465460707289
109121155193194214253254283286295301305306313318328333339341359361365366370375384385389404420522547562581584
162
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 69
Soft limeSandRockLime rock, sand breaksLime rockSandLime rock, sand breaksHard rockLime rockSandRockGummy shaleLime rockShaleRockSandRock and sand breaksSandRock and sand breaksLime rockRockLime rock, streaks of shaleSand and rock breaksHard rockSand and rockHard rockRock and breaksShale and limeSandRockShale and sand breaksSandy shaleTough shale
Thickness (ft)
1341655
3778
191
141623
105
2722
32278
172
18922
122188
Depth (ft)
5976016026086136186556626706896907047057117137167267317587607627948218298468488668758778798919121000
163
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Well 9
Top soilRed claySand with some clayLoose sand with clayClay and shale, sandy streaksClay and shaleLime, sandyHard lime rockClayClay with sandy streaksLime rockSoft sandy claySandy limeHard limeClay with limeClaySoft sand with claySand with limeSandLime rockSandSand with limeSand with rocks streaks, shellsSand with rock streaks, shellsSand with rock streaks, shellsSand with rock streaks, shellsSand with rock streaks, shellsSand with rock streaks, shellsMedium white limeMedium white limeHard white limeHard white limeHard white limeHard white limeExtra hard white-gray limeMedium white limeMedium white limeExtra hard white limeSoft white limeExtra hard white limeExtra hard white limeLoose sand and lime streaksExtra hard lime, whiteSand with limeHard lime
Well 70 Driller: Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
11267172028764
311
1315
17
2618871
255
23222323222
21131023239
1423127212
201
233
Depth (ft)
1138097
117145152158162193194207222223230256274282289290315320343365388411433435456469479502525534548571583590592593595615616639642
164
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 70
SandExtra hard limeSandExtra hard limeSand and lime streaksExtra hard sandy limeExtra hard sandy limeSoft sandy limeExtra hard sandy limeSoft sandy limeExtra hard limeSoft sandy limeExtra hard limeClay with hard lime streaksExtra hard lime withExtra hard lime withSandExtra hard lime withLime and sand streaksExtra hard lime withLime and sand streaksLime and sand streaksLime and sand streaksLime and sand streaksLime and sand streaks
clay and sandclay
clay, cut roughclay, cut rough, lime smooth, lime hard and smooth, lime hard and smooth, lime hard and smooth
Clay with hard lime streaksClay, hard on bottomHard clayHard clay, sandy streaksHard clay
Thickness (ft)
71317
22959
12262
232294
2494
182323222
2123
1132368
Depth (ft)
649650653654661683692697706718720726728751773782786810819823841864887909911932955106810911159
165
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Well 6
Red sandy clayYellow sandFine sandFine white sandSand with clay streaksSandy clayShaleRockLimeRockShaleRockShaleRockGreen sandLime rockGreen sandRockGreen sandRockSandLime rock and sand breaksLime rock and shaleLime rockShaleLime rockHard rockLime rock and sand breaksSandShaleSoft lime rockHard lime rockSand and limeHard lime rockFine sandHard rockSandLime rock and breaks sandLime rockSandLime rock
Well 71 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
15552228429
41472
142
881
105
42267
14253628528
294
71311613174
135113114
Depth (ft)
157092
120162171212216223225239241329330340345387389395402416441477479487492494502531535606637653666683687700751764775779
166
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 73 Owner: Town of Level Plains - Well 1 Driller:
ClayYellow sandYellow sandClayYellow sandYellow marlBlue marlRock breaks and shellMarlShell and sand (blue-gray)MarlRock (blue-hard)MarlRockSandy marlMarlSandyMarlSandy marlSandSandSandSandy marlRockMarlSand rock breaksSandy marl and shellShell rocks and sandLimestone with sandGray rock some sandGray rock and black marl or charcoal sandGray rock and black marl or charcoal sandLimestoneLimestoneLimestoneLimestoneLimestone
Tom Smith Artesian Well
Thickness (ft)
152555
5010155
102055
1222
20173
3723101020352
3310205
152020155
20204040
Co.
Depth (ft)
15404550
100110125130140160215216238240260277280317340350360380415417450460480485500520540555560580600640680
167
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Daleville - Well 2
ClaySand and gravelClaySand and gravelClayClay and rockRockClay and rockSandClayRockClayRockClayRockClaySandSandLime rockSandSand and limeSand, clay, limeRockSandRockClay and rockClay and shellsRockClay and shellsRockClay and limePackClay shells and limeSandLimerockSandLimerockSandLimerockSandLime and rockSand and limeClayLimeLime
Well 74 Driller: Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
11389
1240108
129
433
292
432
30201238
17253
122
155121
112
2145
1012241
15361023
Depth (ft)
11495870
110120128140149192195224226269271301321333336344361386389401403418423424426427438440461465470480481483485489490505541551574
168
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 74
Thickness Depth
_____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Lime 12 586Lime 25 611Lime 32 643Lime 12 655Sand 16 671Lime 5 676Sand 6 68 2Lime 6 688Sand 5 693Lime 4 69 7Sand 4 701Lime 10 711
169
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Dale vi lie - Well 1
Top soilRed claySandSand and gravelSand and clayClaySandClay and rockRockClayRockClay and rockRockClayRockClayRockClaySandSandRockSandSandSandRockSandRockSandRockSandy clayRockClayClay and rockSandClay and rockSand and shellsSand and shellsRockSandSandy claySandy claySandy clayLime rockLime rockLime rock
Well 75 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
2144
2516161122103763
582
301
70211049
22185722241
49953
1375
12182720252217
Depth (ft)
2162045617788
110120123130136139197199229230300321331335344366384389396398400402406407456465470473486493498510528555575600622639
170
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 75
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Limerock 5 644Limerock 3 647Sand 18 665Limerock 2 667Limerock 3 670Limerock 8 678Sand 11 689Sand 3 692Limerock and sand 19 711Limerock 22 733Limerock 45 778
171
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 76 Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Driller:
Airfield
Clay, red and grayFine sand, some rock, gray clayClay, red and gray, fine sandClay, red and gray, fine sand, some rockRed and gray clayGray clay, shellsGray white limestoneSand, gray and white limestoneGray clay, shell, some limestoneGray clay, some limestoneRed and gray clayGray sand, some gray clay and limestoneMostly sand; some red and gray clayVery fine sandFine sand, red clay, some limestoneSand, red clay, limestoneSand, red clay, limestoneLimestone, some sandSand, limestone, some red clayMostly gray clayMostly gray clay, some red clayGray clay, shells, specks of red clayGray clay, some red clay, limestoneGray clay, some red claySand and shells , some gray clayGray clay, some shellsSand and shells, gray claySand, gray clay, shellsRed and gray claySand, shells, red clayLimestone, some red clayRed and gray clayLime s tone , f os s i IsLimestone, fossilsRed clay, gray clay, limestoneLimestone, some chalkyLimestone, real chalkyFine chalky limestone, some clayFine to medium coarse chalky limestoneChalky limestoneRed and gray clay, some limestoneChalky limestoneFine sand, chalky limestoneFine sand, chalky limestoneSand, chalky limestone, some clay
172
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
102730201810131912934010449
10121010101010119
10129
10111010121010121010129
10131010121010
Depth (ft)
10376787
105115128147159252292302346355365377387397407417427438447457469478488499509519531541551563573583595604614627637647659669679
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 76
Mostly sand/ some limestoneVery fine silty sandWhite chalky clay and limestoneWhite chalky clay, coarse limestoneChalky clay, some limestoneGray clay, chalky limestoneGray clay, chalky limestone, some fine sandSand, chalky limestoneSand, chalky limestoneSand, chalky limestoneFine sand, chalky limestoneFine sand, chalky limestoneSand, chalky limestoneFine to medium coarse sand, chalky limestoneFine to medium coarse sand, chalky limestoneMostly fine sand, some chalky limestoneFine silty sand, some limestoneFine silty sand, some limestoneFine silty sand, chalky limestoneFine sand, some limestoneSand, limestoneGray clay, limestoneGray clay, limestoneGray clay, limestone, some sandMedium coarse tan sand, some gray clayFine silty sand, some gray claySand, gray clay, limestoneSand, gray clay, limestoneFine sandFine sand, some gray claySand, gray clay, limestoneSand, limestone, gray clayLimestone, gray clay, some sandMostly gray clay, some limestone
Thickness (ft)
111010111010121010111010101010129
10121010129
10121010119
1012101012
Depth (ft)
6907007107217317417537637737847948048148248348468558658778878979099189289409509609719809901002101210221034
173
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Hatch Field
SandRockRocky marlBlue marlBlue sand fine, packedRockSandy marlRockSandy marlMarlRockMarlRockMarlRockSandy marlRock, marl streaksRockHard rockCoarse sandLimestone
Well 78 Driller: Smith Well and Supply
Thickness (ft)
4048
84202
38266191
111
238
142
201
Company
Depth (ft)
404452
136156158196198204210211220221232233256264278280300301
174
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Well 10
SandRed clayRed sandy clayBlue clayLime clay and rockGreen sandGreen sandGreen sandGreen sandSand and lime rockSand and lime rockCoarse brown sand and limeSoft white limeSoft limeSoft limeSoft limeHard limeHard sand and limeSand and lime breaksSand and hard limeSand and hard limeClay sand and limeBrown sand and limeBrown sand and limeSand and clay, hard limeSand and clay, hard limeClay and sandBlue clay
Well 79 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
48
6825
11732313132303231313132228
31313131323131313232
268
Depth (ft)
41280
1052222542853163483784104414725035355575655966276586897217527838148468781146
175
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 80 Owner: Town of Newton - Well 1 Driller:
Clay, red, sandySand, clay ballsSand, white, coarse and gravelClaySand, red, fineLimestoneRockClay, hardRockClayRockShale, hardRockShale, blue, hardRockClaySand, gray, fineRockShaleSand, fine, hard streaksSand, gray, coarseRockShale, sand, streaksShale, hardLime s tone , hardShaleLimestone, softRockLime s tone , softRockLimestoneSand, limestone breaksLimestone, white, softLime s tone , hardSand , hardRock , hardSand, hardRock , hardSand , hardRock, sand breaksSand , hardRockLimestone, hard; soft streaksSandRock
Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
128
5218
124
192
142
363
291
12132
55491
2917115
121
463
2624586812217
131213
1842
Depth (ft)
12207273819397116118132134170173202203215228230285289298299328345356361373374420423449473531599611613614621634646659660668672674
176
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 80
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Sand 1 675Limestone, hard; soft streaks 5 680Sand 20 700Limestone, hard 25 725Rock 2 727Limestone, hard; soft streaks 27 754Rock 2 756Limestone 5 761
177
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Newton - Well 2
Red claySandSand and gravelSandClayRockSandy clayRockSandy clay and rockRockSandy clayClayRockClayRockSandy clayRockSandy claySand and clay streaksClaySand and clayRockSand with clayClay with rocksClaySand with clayShale and rocksSand with limeGravel with limeLime with sandLime with gravelSoft lime with clayLime and clayClay with limeClay with limeLimeSandRockSand with lime breaksRockSand and rockRockSandRockSand and rock
Well 81 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
15135
506212
554
3441
123
672
31112013
121234
1043232224232223235965
192211
152
Depth (ft)
1528338389919294149153187228229231234301303334345365378379400423427437480503525549572594617640645654660665684686688689690705707
178
Table 3. Driller *s logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 81
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Lime and sand 11 718Lime 12 730Lime and sand 3 733Lime 7 740Lime with sand 18 758Lime 1 759Lime and sand 3 762Lime 35 797
179
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 83 Owner: Town of Midland City - Well 2 Driller:
Clay, redClay and gravelRockSand, yellow, loose, muddyMud , sandy , looseClaySandClaySand and limestoneSand and clayClay, blueRockClay, sandySandSandSand and limestoneClay; limestone streaksRockClayRock , hardClayClay, sand streaksLime s tone , hardLimestone, hard; and sandLimestone; streaks shaleShale, sandy; limestone breaksLimestoneSand , packedLimestoneSand, packedLimestoneLimestone; streaks sandSandRockSandRockSandLimestone; sand breaks
Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
2896
313134
14161671
10123
23502
341
72177
416818
128143
132
4832629-
Depth (ft)
28374374
105108112126142158165166176188191214264266300301373390397438506524652666669682684732735737743745754-
180
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 84 Owner: Town of Midland City - Well 1 Driller:
Sandy clayClaySandSandSandSandSand, streaks claySand, breaks small clayClaySand, fineRock , hardSand, fineSandy claySoft lime rockSoft breaks lime rockShaleLime rockSand and shaleRockShaleGreen sand, lime rock breaksSand and rockRockSand, no goodRock and clayRockSandRockSandRockSandRockSandRockSoft sandy lime rockSoft sandy lime rockSoft sandy lime rock
Layne-Central Company
Thickness(ft)
8421421229
122016514
177
19119
1513
1102022157
531534531191
182221
Depth(ft)
8506485
107116128148164169170174191198217228237252265375395417432439492507510514519522523524533534552574595
181
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Pinckard - Well 2
Top soilRed claySoft pipe clayMuddy sandSandy claySandSandy claySoft rockSandy clay and rock breaksSandy clay and rock breaksLime rock and clay breaksHard clay and lime streaksHard lime rockHard clay and lime rock streaksSandy clay and lime breaksSandy claySandy clay.Hard clayLime rock and sand breaksGreen sand and lime breaksSand and lime streaksSand and lime streaksClay and lime streaksClay and lime streaksLime rockLime rockLime rockSand and lime rockLime and clay breaksLime rockLime rockLime rockLime rockHard lime rockLime rockSand and rock breaksLime and lime breaksLime rockSand and lime breaksHard sand and lime breaksHard sand and lime breaks
Well 85 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
22530471618548
221610115
12172215571922232223168
211210159
222323239
111444
2223
Depth (ft)
22757
104120138192200222238248259264276293315330387406428451473496512520541553563578587609632655678687698712716720742765
182
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 87 Owner: American Brass Inc. - Well 1 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Clay 25 25Flint rock hard 9 34Red clay hard 11 45Rock 1 46Muddy sand 20 66Muddy sand 14 80Clay 2 82Rock hard 13 95Sand lime streak 2 97Packed sand 10 107Clay rock breaks 7 114Rock hard 1 115Clay 3 118Sand 10 128Clay 30 158Packed sand 22 180Sand fine 15 195Rock 2 197Clay lime breaks 18 215
183
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Dothan - Well 4 Napier Field
Sandy, clayClayMuddy sandRockSand and shaleRockSand and shaleHard shaleRockHard shaleHard shaleRockSandy shaleRockLimeRockSandy shaleLimeRockSandRockSandRock
Well 90 Driller: Lay ne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
2819565
481
70178
1143532531762
12110
3182
1632
Depth (ft)
2847
103108156157227244252366401433486503509511523633636654656672704
184
Table 3. Driller's logs of veils in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Dothan - Well 23
Red claySandClaySandLime and claySandClay and limeClayRockLimeClayRockShaleSand and lime rockClay and limeSandClaySand, lime and clay breaksLime and clay breaksSoft limeLime hard breaksLimeHard limeSand and limeSand with lime breaksSand with lime breaksClay and hard limeSand and limeSand and limeRockSand and limeRockSand and limeRockSand and limeSand and limeRockClayRockClayClayRockClayRockClay
Well 91 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
3060164
459
46223
19345
9030
100256
26313231321417318
168
3328151
1391
161461
131
10
Depth (ft)
3090106110155164210232235254288293383413513538544570601633664696710727758766782790823825833834839840853862863879880884890891904905915
185
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Dothan - Well 22
ClaySand , redRockClay, rock and sandHard rockClay, rock and sandRockClayRockSandy clayRockClay, sand and rock streaksSandy clay and limeRockLimeRockBlack clayClay and rock streaksClayRockClaySoft rock and sand streaksHard rockSandSand, clay and rock streaksLime, sand and rockSoft rockClay sand and rock breaksSand and limeSand and limeLime softHard limeSoft lime hard streaksSoft lime hard streaksSoft lime hard streaksSoft lime clay streaksSoft limeSoft lime and rockSoft lime and shale streaksHard lime clay and sand streaksHard lime and sand streaksSandSand rock breaksSandRock
Well 92 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
2080
1272
1019161
877342
296
651
46202
198
402
214
23158
232223225
1822236
162251
Depth (ft)
20100101128130140141150151157158245252255259261290296361362408428430449457497499520524547562570593615638660665683705728734750772111778
186
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 92
Thickness Depth
_____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Sand 6 784Rock 6 790Sand 4 794Sand streaks of lime 22 816Sand streaks of lime 15 831Rock sand and clay streaks 7 838Rock sand and clay streaks 22 860
187
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Headland - Well 1
ClaySandSandPacked sandRed sandLime rockShaleLime rockSandRockFine sandSandSand and shaleRockSand shale and breaks limerockLime rockShaleSandSandrock and shaleLimerockSandShale and sand breaksLimerock and sand breaksShaleLimerockSandSandLigniteLimerock and sand breaksRockSand
Well 94 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
10134526886
1831
1621203
1629
1019
26363
33333169131311147
16
Depth (ft)
10236894102110116134137138154175195198214243344353379415418451484515584597610621635642658
188
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 95 Owner: City of Headland - Well 2 Driller:
ClaySandClaySand and gravelRockSandRockLimeClayClayClay and sandClayRockLimeRockSand and clayShaleShale and sandLime and sandLime rockLime and sandLime rockSandSandClayLime , hardClayLime and claySandy clayClaySandy clayLimeLimeLimeLimeLimeLimeLimeLimeSandLimeSandLimeLimeLimeLimeLimeSand and limeLime
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
19196
382
133
3156142419272
5451251068
115684
12341148
292322221211224
1015393335
11
Depth (ft)
193844828497100131187201225244246253255309360385395401409420425431439443455489500504512541564586608620631653657667668673676685688691694699710
189
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Dothan - Well 13
Red sandy clayLoose sandy clayClaySandSandy clayClayRockSoft lime rockHard lime rockClayLoose sandLoose sand and red clayLoose sand and clayHard rockClayRockClay and rock breaksRockSand and rock breaksLime rockRock and sand breaksBlue sand clay and rock breaksRockSand and rock breaksHard rockClayLoose sandRockClayBlue sandy clayRockSandClaySand draggySand and clay breaksClayRockHard sandHard lime rockBlue sandy shale and rockBlue clayRockShaleRockSandy shale
Well 96 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
155256
2528
125
2523105
161
20175
1461512
1424
122
115
1626131487
24172
1221
45
Depth (ft)
15202227335860688085110133143148164165185186193198212218219224225227241243247259261272277293319332346354361385402405527528573
190
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 96
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Sand and streaks shale 12 585Hard blue sand 10 595Hard blue sand and rock breaks 19 614Hard gray sand and rock breaks 23 637Sand and sand rock breaks, bottom limestone cut better 28 665Gray packed sand 8 673Lime rock 2 675Packed sand, limerock breaks 7 682Packed sand fine 10 692Limerock 3 695Packed sand fine 9 704Sand and rock breaks, rock 3 to 5 ft apart 19 723Clay 5 728Sand, clay, limerock 22 750Limerock, hard and soft streaks 100 850Hard rock 20 870Hard shale 18 888Rock and clay breaks 23 911
191
Table 3. Driller *s logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Dothan - Well 14
ClaySoft sandClayLimestoneSandSandClaySandClaySand and clayClay, sand and gravelClay and sandSandLimerockSandLimerockSandLimerock and claySand, clay and limestoneLimestone and sandSand and limestoneLimestoneLimestoneLimestoneLimestoneClaySandLimerockSandLimerockSandLimerockLimerock and sandLimerock and sandLimerock and sandLimestone and sand and clayShale and lime
Well 97 Driller: Layne -Central Company
Thickness(ft)
9153173
2328
12323015903
116
1723246
2722131363195125
131
171
2323232369
Depth(ft)
924556265889098110142172187277280291297314337361367394416429442505700712717730731748749772795818841910
192
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Dothan - Well 15
ClaySandClaySand and clayClaySandLime rockLimerock and sandSandy clayClaySand and clayLimerock and clayRockLimerock and clayClayRockSandSandRockSand and limerockSandSand and limestoneSandLimerockSandSandLimestoneSandSandRockSandLigniteSandy clay
Well 98 Driller: Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
273
202421491043511031644
53118
6853
1513101624
10421720
12229
Depth (ft)
2730507495144154197248258289353357410528534542547550565578588604606610620662679699700722724733
193
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Dothan - Well 24
Orange clayRed sand, gravelRed sandy clayRed sandy clay, gravelLime rockSoft yellow sandSoft yellow sandRed clayHard rockSAnd, gravel claySandSandSandYellow clayRockHard sand and limeMedium pack sand, limeSoft sand, shaleSoft sand, shale, claySoft sand, shale, claySoft sand, claySoft sandPacked sand and claySand and shaleSoft rockShale, sand streaksShale, sand, limeClay with sand streaksRockRock with sand streaksSand lime, claySand, shale, lime, clayClay with sandClay with sandRockSand and clay streaksClayClaySand with clay streaksRock with sand streaksLime with sand and shale streaksSand with hard rock streaksSand, lime clay shaleSand, clay shaleSandy clay
Well 99 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
15167
1219941
172323453
185
11232323158
111
1113133278
541023
46119396
23239
Depth (ft)
15313850516069737491
114137141146149167172183206229252267275286287298311324327329336344398408410413459470479482491497520543552
194
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 99
RockClayClaySandy limeSandy limeLimeLimeSoft limeHard limeWhite limeSoft sand, gravel claySand with hard streaks clayHard sand, lime, clayHard limeHard limeHard limeHard lime, soft streaksMedium lime, hard streaksHard limeHard limeMedium lime, hard streaksSoft lime, hard streaksHard limeSand with limeSand with limeSand with hard limeSand with limeSand with limeHard limeSand , limeHard lime -sandSand with hard limeSand with hard limeHard rockSandy limeSand with rockSand with rockSand and limeHard sand, limeHard sand, limeHard sand, lime
Thickness (ft)
1126
17977
1012239
142223139
231767
1156
1663
147565
221454
22166
232210
Depth (ft)
55356557158859760461162163365666567970172473774676978679279981081582183784384686086787287888390591992492895096697299510171027
195
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Do than - Well 19
Red clayCoarse red sand and clayWhite sand and clayBlue clayHard shaleRockHard shaleRockShale and rock streaksShale and sandHard shale and shellsSand and chalk streaksRockSand and shale coarse gravelHard clayRockClayRockClayRockHard clayRock shale streaksShaleSand with lime streaksClay and sand streaksSandy clayRockSandy clayRock clay streaksSand and rock streaksRockSand, clay and limeRockSand, clay and limeSandy limeSandy limeSandy limeSandLime and small clayLimeSoft lime, claySoft lime, clayHard clay and limeSandy limeHard lime and clayHard lime and clayHard clay and limeHard lime and clay
Well 100 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
152342661
151
213628242
4827251
1571
164
158
2251634162
142022128
23202320311421222246
Depth (ft)
153880869293
108109130166194218220268295297302303460461477481496504526531532538541545546552554568588610622630653673696716747761782804826872
Table 3. Driller *s logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Dothan - Well 20
ClaySandy claySandSandy clayClaySandClayLime, clay and gravelLime and rockSandRockSand clayRockClay, sand and rock breaksClay and shaleRockLime, clay and shaleRockShaleRockShaleSoft rockSandy shaleRockSandRock and sand breaksSand, shale and limeRock softSand, shale and limeClay and lime, rock breaksSand and limeSand and limeSand and ligniteSand and ligniteClayClay and limeLime and clay breaksLime and clay breaksHard lime and clayClay and limeClay and limeSand, clay and limeSand and limeSand and limeSand and limeSandRockClay
Well 101 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
1022481154
118
2012
150
117376
531
471
64242
216
243
1319232223175
176
378
222223222210166
12
Depth (ft)
1032809196100111119139151152202203220257263316317364365429431435437458464488491504523546568591608613630636673681703725748770792802818824836
197
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 102 Owner: City of Dothan - Well 25 Driller:
Top soilRed clayFirm sand, small clay streaksClayLoose sandLime rock , hardHard sand with limeHard limeCoarse sand and limeSandHard rockClaySoft sandy clayRockHard c layHard packed coarse sand, fine gravelSand, fine gravel, lime and green clayRock , limeCoarse sand, lime and clayGummy claySand and limeGummy clayHard rockSand lime and shaleSand lime and shale (hard)Hard sand, some clay and rockHard clay and rockHard clay, rock and sandSand, rock and clay, hardSand with claySand lime and clay streaks, hardSoft limeHard lime, soft streaksSoft limeHard limeHard lime, soft streaks (clay)Hard lime, brittleHard lime, soft streaks (clay)Hard limePacked sand, with lime, little clayPacked sand with lime, little clayPacked sand with lime, small clay streaksHard rock (4 in. )SandPacked sand and clay streaks
198
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
11693
571817712819
28324
35647
1115494145234512684
7511122222227
162218
128
Depth (ft)
117262986879596103110111113121122131159191195230236240247258273322363408431476488556560635646658680702724731747769787788790798
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 102
Rock ( 2 in. )Packed sand and clay streaksRock (2 in. )Packed sand and clay streaksPacked sand(Hard) rockSand and clayLime rock , hardSoft lime, some clayLime rock , hardSoft lime, some claySoft limeLime rock , hardLime, sandy, some clayLime, sandy, some clayLime rock (extra hard)Medium limeHard sandy limeHard sandy limeHard sandy lime
Thickness (ft)
1715326371121
2094
10232323
Depth (ft)
799806807812815817823826833834835837838858867871881904927950
199
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Dothan Waste Treatment Facility
ChalkGravelClaySandClaySandChalkLimestoneChalkMarlMarlRockRockMarlMarlMarlMarlMarlMarlMarlRockMarlMarlMarlSandRockSandRockSandRock and sandSands toneSands toneSandstoneRockRockSandSandSand
Well 103 Driller: Smith Well and Supply
Thickness (ft)
82
42249
314556
1284
11257
115
3711
186
102064158
20195
196
112020
Co.
Depth (ft)
810527685
116120125130136148156160171196203214219256257258276282292312318322323328336356375380399405416436456
200
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Dothan - Well 17
Top soilSoft clayHard claySandy clayRockClayGreen sandy lime -lost returnsRockLime rockSandRockSand and rock streaksHard rockLime rock softerRockLimeRockLime rock and soft streaksSoft lime and sandRockSand and claySoft rockLime and sandClayRockClay and rock breaksClayRockClay and rock streaksRockClay and rock streaksSand Nanafalia or NeheolaSandLime rockSand, lime and shellsLime rockSand, lime and shellsSAnd, lime and shellsRockSand and limeRockFiner sand and limeFiner sand and limeLime, hard and soft streaksBrown sand and lime ProvidenceBrown sand and limeBrown sand and limeClay and rock streaks
Well 104 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
13
12111311352
1941
201622281
29933
202
191735
1002
201
4686487
2153
122
2427541023158
Depth (ft)
14
162740518688
107111112132148170172180181210303306326328347364367372472474494495541549555559567574595600603615617641668722732755770778
201
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Do than - Well 9
ClaySandy clayClaySandRockSand and rock breaksSandSand rockRockHard sandy limeRockFine sandClaySandSandClaySandRockClaySandSandClaySandClayRockSandHard limeSandy limeLimestoneLime rock hardShaleSandRock, softSandRock, small breaks, sandRockSandRock sand breaksSandRockSandRockSandRockHard sand
Well 105 Driller: Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
755
1010121311152
368
1817
134
1517
1756
184
17108
191310
180714
108
18464
103836
Depth (ft)
758090100112125136151153189197215216223236240255256263280285291309313330340348367380390570577578582592600618622628632642645653656662
202
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 105
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Rock 2 664Hard sand 4 668Rock 2 670Sand, three small boulders 21 691Sand 5 696Limerock 54 750Pack sand 40 790Clay 35 825Hard rock 10 835 Rock
203
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: City of Dothan - Well 12
Top soilHard claySandy clayCoarse white sandWhite clay and sandRock (flint)Pack sand with soft streaksSand and limestone streaksSand and streaks red claySand and streaks red clayHard limestoneLimestone and sand breaksFine muddy sandLimestone and sand breaksClayLime rockClay and limerockSandClayFine sand and rock breaksDraggy sandSand (cut good)Sand (draggy)Sandy clayRockSand and limerock breaksLimestone, sand rock and claySand and limestoneLimerockSandSand and limestone breaksLimerock and sand breaksLimerockLimestone and white sandy clayLimerockLimerock and sand breaksRed sandRed sandSand and clay
Well 106 Driller: Layne -Central Company
Thickness (ft)
25022101041218
1497
218
1031
1138
291211212035
240277
1011295
31517
241830
Depth (ft)
252748494135156164178187194215223233236237248251259288300311332352355360600627634644655684689720771778802820850
204
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 108 Owner: City of Dothan - Well 10 Driller:
Red sandy clayCoarse red sandClayCoarse sand streaks, clayCoarse yellow sandRockSandRock and sand breaksSandLime rockSandSandClaySandSandy shaleLimestoneSandRockSoft lime sand streaksRockFine sandRockLimerock sand streaksHard rockShaleRock , hardShaleSandRockSandRockSandRockSandRockSandRockRock and sand breaksSandRockSandRockFine sandRock and sand breaksSand coarser than above with breaks lime rock
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
211216375116242
2216146
561533
33142214
17463
13911117121448173221
118
10
Depth (ft)
21334986137153155159161183199213219275290293296329343345347348352369415418557568579586587589590594598606607614617619621622633641651
205
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 108
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Rock 2 653Sand 4 657Rock 1 658Sand 2 660Limerock 43 703Liraerock breaks red sand 9 712Pack sand 13 725Rock 3 728Pack sand 44 772Hard sandy lime and shale 18 790
206
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 109 Owner: City of Dothan - Well 7 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Clay 8 8Sand 40 48Clay 10 58Clay and boulders 3 61Sand, soft, muddy 39 100 BoulderSand, white, packed 6 106Sand, yellow, soft 21 127Sand, red, soft, with shell and gravel 23 150Sand, red, soft 15 165Clay, sand 5 170Rock; soft and hard streaks 27 197Rock 2 199Sand 3 202Rock 1 203Limestone; sand breaks 19 222Sand 30 252Clay 3 255Sand 24 279Clay 4 283Sand 20 303Rock 1 304Sand 25 329 Rock
207
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 110 Owner: City of Dothan - Well 11 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Clay 52 52 Limestone, lost returns pumped cement in it,
and finally set 24 in. surface casing 38 90Packed sand with soft streaks 53 143Packed sand 20 163Rock 1 164Clay 4 168Lime rock 27 195Sand and lime breaks 34 229Clay and lime breaks 51 280Sandy clay 12 292Sand 6 298Sandy clay 25 323Limestone 95 418Clay 125 543Blue and white clay 63 606Hard shale 19 625Limerock 5 630Dark gray sand 2 632Limerock 3 635Dark gray sand 11 646Dark gray sand 12 658Limerock 3 661Sand 2 663Limerock 1 6643 to 4 ft streaks sand with 6 to 8 in. breaks limerock 70 734Sand and limerock 70 804Brown sand and small rock breaks 31 835Blue shale 15 850
208
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 111 Owner: City of Dothan - Well 16 Driller:
ClaySandy clayClaySandClaySandy clayClayLimeCavi tyOpen holeSoft sandSandRockHard lime streakSand lime streakSand lime streakSoft rockClayRockSandy clayRockSandy clayRockDraggy sandClaySand (sample No. 1 )ClaySand (sample No. 2)Sand lime streakRock softHard sandPack sand (sample No. 3)Pack sandRockSand lime (sample No. 4 cut fair)Hard sand limeRockSandy clayClaySandy clayClayHard rockSandy clayClayRock
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
75
13449
169-5
18587
35592
1527183
1012152
2456
181651
29168
448
2119
12331
Depth (ft)
712252933425867-7290
148155190195204206221223230231239242252264279281305310316334350355356385401409453461482501502525528529
209
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 111
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Sandy clay 12 541 RockSandy clay 10 551 RockClay 5 556Rock 1 557Sandy clay 35 592Green sand (sample No. 5 1/8 in.) 24 616Rock 1 617Draggy green sand 5 622Hard lime rock 6 628Packed sand 10 638Sandy lime (sample No. 6 1/2 in. mud) 5 643Hard lime sand 17 660Pack sand gray (sample No. 7 1/4 in. mud) 4 664Pack sand lime (sample No. 8 1/8 in. mud) 16 680Clay lime 20 700Fine sand (sample No. 9) 11 711Hard lime sandy clay (sample No. 10) 22 733Hard lime sandy clay 23 756Same 28 784Pack sand 3 small lime breaks (sample No. 11 1/3 in. mud) 20 804Lime clay 63 867
210
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 112 Owner: City of Dothan - Well 21 Driller:
Sandy claySandPink claySandClayLime , hardLime, hard and softSand and soft limeRockHard lime, blue claySand and blue clay streaksSoft lime with hard streaksHard limeLime rockSand , graySand, grayRockSand, graySand, graySand lime and clay streaksSand and graySand and limes streaksLime rockHard and soft limeRockClayRock, hard limeClay and shaleSand, greenSand, greenHard lime, clay and sand streaksLime and sand streaksSand, greenSand with lime breaks, gray sandRock , hardSand with lime breaks, gray sandSand lime breaks with clay streaksSand and lime streaksHard clay and limeHard clay and sandy limeClay
Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
1214206
331628422
1314692
202716
16
134710452
382
398
100158
148
1461
16223
194345
Depth (ft)
1226465285
101129171173186200269271291318334335341354401411456458496498537545645660668682690704710711727749752771814859
211
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army - Fort Rucker Alien Field
Sandy clayGrave 1Soft chalkStiff clayClay rockClay marlRockMarlRockSandy marlRockMucky sandSoft marlMarl rockHard rockSandy marlMarlRockMarlSandy marlSandRockSand
Well 114 Driller: Smith Well and Supply
Thickness(ft)
153025301040231
122
1015225
23255
10010102
28
Co.
Depth(ft)
154570
100110150152155156168170180195217222245270275375385395397425
212
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 116 Owner: Mount Pleasant - Battens Crossroads Driller: Foy English Drilling Co,
_____Water Authority___________________ __________________________________Thickness Depth
(ft) (ft)
ClaySand and clayClay and rockSand and claySand, marl, and rockSand and marlMarl and rockMarlLimestone and sandLimestone
201202030406020
32040
142
20140160190230290310630670812
213
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 117 Owner: Carson Brunson Driller: John D. Hughes and Son
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Red sandy clay 12 12Sand 38 50Yellow clay 15 65Sand 30 95White rock 2 97Sand 9 106Yellow clay 4 110Sand and marl 20 130Gray sand 32 162Gray shell rock 8 170Gray sand and marl 48 218Fine sand and white shell 6 224Marl 57 281Gray rock 2 283Marl with layers of B.P. sand 7 290Marl, gray rock and sand 205 495Gray rock 1 496Gray sand with layers of sandstone 32 528White rock 2 530Gray sand and marl 10 540Fine gray sand and shell rock 15 555White rock 5 560Gray sand and shell rock 75 635Coarse sand 10 645Limestone 115 760
214
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Conagra, Inc.
Red claySandSandy claySandSand, clay, limeLime rockSand and limeClaySandRockSand and shaleRockSand and shaleLime and shaleRockSand, shale, limeRockClay and sandClay and sandSand and shaleRockSand and shaleRockSand and claySand, clay, limeSand, clayLime and sandSand, lime and claySand and clayLimeSand and limeSandLime and sand
Well 120 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness (ft)
20261532464
201391
511
3525
145
1645119
11625
318
246358
198578
23
Depth (ft)
20466193139143163176185186237238273298299344345409460479480496498503534542566629687885942950973
215
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 122 Owner: Town of Coffee Springs - Well 1 Driller: Layne-Central Company
Thickness Depth (ft) (ft)
Sandy clay 84 84Rock 1 85Clay 12 97Clay and boulders 6 103Clay 5 108Rock 1 109Clay 4 113Rock 1 114Clay 10 124Rock 1 125Lime rock 43 168Sand and limerock 21 189Sand 33 222Muck and shale 32 254Sand 37 291
216
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Bellwood
Top soilClayChalkSandClaySandChalkRockClayRockMarlRockSandRockMarlSandMarlRockSandSandMarlSandSandSandMarlSand and marlSandMarlMarlRockRockSandRockMarlSandRockSandRockSandMarlRockRock and marlMarlSandRock
Well 124 Driller: Smith Well and Supply
Thickness (ft)
14
137
23126111
30121
279
172
1820929
101020164563
1425
1011629
3012
3013
1
Co.
Depth (ft)
15
182548606667686999100102103130139156158176196205207216226236256272276281287290304306311321332338340349379380382412425426
217
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 124
Thickness Depth
____________________________________________________(ft) (ft)
Sand 1 427Marl 1 436Marl 30 466Rock 2 468Marl 8 476Marl 30 506Sand 6 512Rock 1 513Sand 23 536Sand 20 556
218
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: U.S. Army
ClaySandy claySandy gravelSandSandy claySoft marlSoft rockMarl rockMarlRockSandy shellsSandy clayRockPepper sandMucky sandMarlClay, sandRockSandRockSand
Well 125 Driller: Smith Well and Supply
Thickness (ft)
1020152050105
1114
125192
43392417781
14
Co.
Depth (ft)
10304565
115125130141155156181200202245284308325332340341355
219
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Well 126 Owner: Town of Malvern - Well 2 Driller:
ClaySandy clayClaySandy claySandy clay whiteSand and claySandSandSand looseClay and coarse sandClaySand looseSand packedSand coarse packedSand packed to looseSand packedSand looseClay soft sandySand rock with lime and shellsSand rock and sandGray rockLime rock with soft streaksSand rock and sandRockSand loose with limeLime with sandy streaksRock limeLime rock and lime 4 in. rockLime rock broken with lime clay streaksSand looseRockSand with rock 1 in.Rock sandySand softRockSand with rock softRockSand soft with rock streaksSand blueSand packedClay
Powell Drilling Company
Thickness (ft)
14728
14245
198898
105
208
1617361
1218
14
18187414311134
1615
Depth (ft)
1421233145697493
101109118126136141161169185202205211212224242243247265266274281285286290293294295296299303319320325
220
Table 3. Driller's logs of wells in the Fort Rucker area Continued
Owner: Town of Malvern - Well 1
ClaySandy claySandClay with 4 in. rockSand clay with gravelSand and gravelSand packedSandy clay 4 in. rockSandy clayClay with rock breaksSandRock limeSand clayRock limeLime and lime rock breaksRockMarl with sand streaksSandMarl sandy with rock breaksRock lime with sand streaksLimeRockLime with 6 in. rockSand looseRock limeSand looseShale and marlMarlRockSand with lignite packedSand with lignite packedRockSand with lignite packedRockSandSand and rock breaksMarl sandySand packedSand
Well 127 Driller: Powell Drilling Company
Thickness (ft)
53
1625151925344
4021691
152
259
1016
123
1210152
2051912
144
105
Depth (ft)
58
24496483
108111115119159161162168177178193195220229239240246258261273283298300320325326335336338352356366371
. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1984-544-130/10010 Region 4.
221
