humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    1/32

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    2/32

    PREVIEW

    Review Classical Theories of Organizations Taylors Theory of Scientific Management

    FayolsAdministrative Theory

    Webers Theory of Bureaucracy

    Humanistic Theories of Organizations Human Relations Theory

    The Hawthorne Studies

    Mary Parker Follet

    Chester Barnard

    McGregors Theory X and Theory Y

    Human Resources Theory LikertsSystems Theory (Four Systems of Management)

    Blake and Moutons (Blake and McCanse) Managerial Grid

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    3/32

    Classical Theories Reviewed

    Classical Theories of Organizations

    Taylors Theory of Scientific Management (tasks)

    FayolsAdministrative Theory (mgmt)

    Webers Theory of Bureaucracy (org structure)

    All 3 theories attempt to enhance managements ability topredict and control the behavior of their workers

    Considered only the task function of communication (ignoredrelational and maintenance functions of communication)

    Designed to predict and control behavior in organizations

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    4/32

    Classical vs. Humanistic

    Classical theories emphasized coercion, control, and punishment(FOCUS ON TASKS /PRODUCTION).

    Maintain predictability and control

    Decision-making power at top of hierarchy

    Minimize input from lower-level employees

    Rely on science and rules to guide behavior

    Regulate communication to increase predictability and decreasemisunderstandings

    Result:

    Workers feel they have no control over their work situation

    Management does not care about their ideas

    Feelings and ideas of workers are unimportant

    Humanistic theories were developed to promote the CONCERNS of theindividual worker in an atmosphere that was too focused onproduction (FOCUS ON RELATIONAL & MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS)

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    5/32

    Principles of Human Relations Theory

    Human relations theory is characterized by a shift in emphasis from TASK

    to WORKER

    Go beyond physical contributions to include creative, cognitive, and

    emotional aspects of workers

    Based on a more dyadic (two-way) conceptualization of communication. SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS are at the heart of organizational behavior--

    effectiveness is contingent on the social well-being of workers

    Workers communicate opinions, complaints, suggestions, and feelings to

    increase satisfaction and production

    Origins (Hawthorne Studies & work of Chester Barnard)

    Human Relations School of Management - Elton Mayo

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    6/32

    Origins of Human Relations

    Theory

    Arose out of the influences of

    the threat of unionization.

    the Hawthorne studies.

    the philosophy of industrial

    humanism.

    The uman Relations MovementPyramid

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    7/32

    The Threat of Unionization

    The Wagner Act of 1935 legalized union-management

    collective bargaining, promoting the growth of unions and

    union avoidance by firms.

    The Hawthorne Studies (1924)

    Hawthorne Works of Western Electric Company

    1924 - Chicago

    Research focus: Relation of quality and quantity of illumination to efficiency in

    industry Four Important Studies

    The studys results that productivity was strongly affected by attitudes of

    management toward the humanistic and realistic viewpoint of the social

    man model.

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    8/32

    Industrial Humanism

    Followed the classical perspective in the

    development of management thought.

    Is associated with the contributions of :

    Mary Parker Follett

    Elton Mayo

    Douglas McGregor

    Chester Barnard And others

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    9/32

    Mary Parker Follett(1868-1933)

    Attached great importance to socio-psychologicalproblems

    Was of the view that conflict is not necessarilydestructive..it may be constructive also

    Concluded that a key to effective management wascoordination.

    Felt that managers needed to coordinate andharmonize group effort rather than force and coercepeople.

    Believed that management is a continuous, dynamicprocess.

    Felt that the best decisions would be made by peoplewho were closest to the situation.

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    10/32

    Follett on Effective Work Groups

    Four principles of coordination to promoteeffective work groups:

    1. Coordination requires that people be in direct

    contact with one another.

    2. Coordination is essential during the initial stagesof any endeavor.

    3. Coordination must address all factors and phasesof any endeavor.

    4. Coordination is a continuous, ongoing process

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    11/32

    Elton MayoConducted the famous Hawthorne

    Experiments.

    Hawthorne EffectProductivity increased

    because attention was paid

    to the workers in the

    experiment.

    Phenomenon wherebyindividual or group

    performance is influenced by

    human behavior factors.

    His work represents the transition

    from scientific management to theearly human relations movement.

    He concluded that the rabble

    hypothesis about human behaviour

    was unfoundedElton Mayo

    1880 1949

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    12/32

    The Hawthorne Studies

    Illumination Study(November 1924)

    Designed to test the effect of lighting intensity on worker productivity

    influence of human relations on work behavior

    Relay Assembly Test Room Study(1927-1932)

    Assembly of telephone relays (35 parts - 4 machine screws)

    Production and satisfaction increased

    Workers increased production and satisfaction related to supervisory practices

    Human interrelationships are important contributing factors to worker productivity

    Bottom Line: Supervisory practices increase employee morale AND productivity

    Interviewing Program(1928-1930)

    Investigate connection between supervisory practices and employee morale

    Employees expressed their ideas and feelings (e.g., likes and dislikes)

    Process more important than actual results

    Bank Wiring Room Observation Study(November 1931 - May 1932)

    Social groups can influence production and individual work behavior

    How is social control manifested on the shop floor?

    Informal organization affect employee behavior positively within formal organizationalstructure

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    13/32

    IlluminationStudies1924-1927

    Funded by General Electric

    Conducted by The National Research Council (NRC) of the NationalAcademy of Sciences with engineers from MIT

    Measured Light Intensity vs. Worker Output

    ResultEach change resulted in higher output and reported greateremployee satisfaction

    Conclusions: Light intensity has no conclusive effect on output

    Productivity has a psychological component Researchers interaction withthe workers influenced higher performance

    Concept of Hawthorne Effect was created

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    14/32

    Relay Assembly Test Experiments1927-1929

    Western Electric wanted more information

    Harvard researchers brought in to analyze the resultsElton Mayo & Fritz Roethlisberger

    Group of 6 Women(5) Assemblers and (1) Layout Operator

    One ObserverExplained every incremental change and recorded results

    Manipulated factors of production to measure effect on output: Pay Incentives

    Length of Work Day & Work Week

    Use of Rest Periods

    Company Sponsored Meals

    Management Visits / Special Attention

    ResultMost changes resulted in higher output and reported greater employee satisfaction

    Conclusions:

    Experiments yielded positive effects even with negative influences workers output willincrease as a response to attention

    Strong social bonds were created within the test group. Workers are influenced by need forrecognition, security and sense of belonging

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    15/32

    Relay Assembly Room #2 - 1928-1929

    Measured output changes with pay incentive changes

    Special observation room to re-test some of the factors on othergroups

    Workers were paid the group bonus incentives

    Results

    During nine weeks there was 13% increase in the output on averageper person

    Conclusion: Pay incentives were a relevant factor in outputincreases but not the only factor.

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    16/32

    Mica Splitting Test Group - 1928-1931

    Measured output changes with changes in work conditionsonly:

    Special Observation Room

    Length of Work Day

    Use of Rest Periods Workers stayed on established Piece-rate compensation

    Result - Productivity increased by 15% over standard outputbase

    Conclusions: Productivity is affected by non-pay considerations

    Social dynamics are a basis of worker performance

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    17/32

    Plant Interview Program1925-1932

    1925-1927Objective Questions Work Conditions

    Work Relationships

    Yes/No Answers

    1928-1932Conversational / Non-directive

    Attentive Sympathetic Listening Concern for personal needs

    Increased in time from 30-90 minutes

    ResultRemarkable positive employee perceptions: Working Condition Improved

    Better Wages

    Conclusions: New Supervisory Style improved worker morale

    Complaints reflected personal and/or social barriers that needed attention in order toraise productivity

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    18/32

    Bank Wiring Observation Group1931-1932

    14 Male Workers

    Few Special Conditions Segregated work area

    No Management Visits

    Supervision would remain the same

    Observer would record data onlyno interaction with workers

    New incentive pay rate was established for the small group

    Any increases in output would be included in departmental pay incentives

    ResultNo appreciable changes in output

    Conclusions: Well established performance norms existed in the group

    Informal Social Organization dictated little deviation from established productionstandards Systemic Soldiering

    Informal Social Organizations protect workers from managers who Raise production standards

    Cut pay rates

    Challenge workplace norms

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    19/32

    Hawthorne Studies - Implications

    Illumination Study(November 1924)

    The mere practice of observing peoples behavior tends to alter their behavior(Hawthorne Effect)

    Relay Assembly Test Room Study(1927-1932)

    Relationships between workers and their supervisors are powerful

    Human interrelationships increase the amount and quality of worker participation indecision making

    Interviewing Program(1928-1930)

    Demonstrated powerful influence of upward communication

    Workers were asked for opinions, told they mattered, and positive attitudes towardcompany increased

    Bank Wiring Room Observation Study(November 1931 - May 1932)

    Led future theorists to account for the existence of informal communication

    Taken together, these studies helped to document the powerful nature of socialrelations in the workplace and moved managers more toward the interpersonalaspects of organizing.

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    20/32

    Chester Barnard:

    The Emergence of Communication

    Considered a bridge between classical and human relationstheories

    The Functions of the Executive (1938)

    Argues for . . .

    strict lines of communication - classical theory a human-based system of organization

    The potential of every worker and the centrality ofcommunication to the organizing process

    Six Issues Relevant to Organizational Communication

    Formal vs. Informal Organization

    Cooperation

    Communication

    Incentives

    Authority

    Zone of Indifference

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    21/32

    Felt that executives serve two primary functions: Must establish and maintain a communications

    system among employees.

    Must establish the objectives of the organization and

    motivate employees. Developed an acceptance theory of authority:

    Authority of a manager flows from the ability ofsubordinates to accept or reject an order from the

    manager once they: Comprehend what the order requires of them.

    Review the orders consistency with organization goals.

    Perceive a personal benefit in obeying the order

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    22/32

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    23/32

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    24/32

    Incentives

    Should be available

    Authority

    Associated with securing cooperation for organizational members

    The interrelationship among the originator of the communication, thecommunication itself, and the receiver

    Authority of position OVER Authority of Leadership (knowledge &ability).

    Zone of Indifference - orders followed

    Marks the boundaries of what employees will consider doing without

    question, based on expectations developed on entering theorganization.

    Barnard drew attention away from formal organizational structurestoward communication, cooperation, and the informal organization. Hiswork was integrated by other theorists in the human relations movement.

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    25/32

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    26/32

    Theory X and Theory Y

    Theory X managers perceive that their

    subordinates have an inherent dislike of work and

    will avoid it if at all possible.

    Theory Y managers perceive that their

    subordinates enjoy work and that they will gain

    satisfaction from performing their jobs.

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    27/32

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    28/32

    Theory X and Theory Y: Linkage with management

    theories

    Theory X - Classical Theory

    Three Assumptions

    The average human being has an inherent dislike

    of work and will avoid it. Most people must be coerced, controlled,

    directed, and threatened with punishment

    The average human being prefers to be directed,wishes to avoid responsibility, has relatively little

    ambition, wants security.

    Neither explains nor describes human nature

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    29/32

    Theory Y - Human Relations Theory

    Assumptions

    Physical and mental effort in work is similar to play / rest.

    External control and the threat of punishment are not the onlystrategies

    Commitment to objectives is a function of the rewards associatedwith their achievement

    The average human being learns, under proper conditions, notonly to accept but to seek responsibility

    The capacity to exercise a high degree of imagination, ingenuity,

    and creativity in the solution of organizational problems is widelydistributed in the population

    Intellectual potentialities of the average human being areunderutilized

    A more positive perspective of human nature

    The KEY to control and quality production is commitment toorganizational objectives

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    30/32

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    31/32

    Blake and Moutons Managerial Grid

    Stresses interrelationship between production (task) and people

    Managements main purpose is to promote a culture in the organization thatallows for high production at the same time that employees are fostered intheir professional and personal development

    Managerial Grid - now Leadership Grid (Blake & McCanse) (Figure 3.3, p. 59) FOCUS: Mangers Assumptions about CONCERN for PEOPLE and CONCERN

    for PRODUCTION

    Concern for PEOPLE

    Degree of personal commitment to ones job

    Trust-based accountability (vs. obedience-based accountability)

    Self-esteem for the individual Interpersonal relationships with co-workers

    Concern for PRODUCTION

    Use of people and technology to accomplish organizational tasks

    Concern for is not about quantity or quality

    Assessment instrument does not represent personality traits of the manager-- instead, indicate a specific orientation to production and people

  • 8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01

    32/32

    Blake and Moutons Managerial Grid

    Authority Compliance (9,1)

    Classical theory

    Country Club (1,9)

    Informal grapevineImpoverished (1,1)

    Laissez-faire

    Middle-of-the-Road (5,5)

    Compromise (carrot & stick)

    Team (9,9)

    Human Resources Approach

    Promote the conditions that integrate

    creativity, high productivity, and high

    morale through concerted team action