Upload
javaid-ali-shah
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
1/32
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
2/32
PREVIEW
Review Classical Theories of Organizations Taylors Theory of Scientific Management
FayolsAdministrative Theory
Webers Theory of Bureaucracy
Humanistic Theories of Organizations Human Relations Theory
The Hawthorne Studies
Mary Parker Follet
Chester Barnard
McGregors Theory X and Theory Y
Human Resources Theory LikertsSystems Theory (Four Systems of Management)
Blake and Moutons (Blake and McCanse) Managerial Grid
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
3/32
Classical Theories Reviewed
Classical Theories of Organizations
Taylors Theory of Scientific Management (tasks)
FayolsAdministrative Theory (mgmt)
Webers Theory of Bureaucracy (org structure)
All 3 theories attempt to enhance managements ability topredict and control the behavior of their workers
Considered only the task function of communication (ignoredrelational and maintenance functions of communication)
Designed to predict and control behavior in organizations
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
4/32
Classical vs. Humanistic
Classical theories emphasized coercion, control, and punishment(FOCUS ON TASKS /PRODUCTION).
Maintain predictability and control
Decision-making power at top of hierarchy
Minimize input from lower-level employees
Rely on science and rules to guide behavior
Regulate communication to increase predictability and decreasemisunderstandings
Result:
Workers feel they have no control over their work situation
Management does not care about their ideas
Feelings and ideas of workers are unimportant
Humanistic theories were developed to promote the CONCERNS of theindividual worker in an atmosphere that was too focused onproduction (FOCUS ON RELATIONAL & MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS)
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
5/32
Principles of Human Relations Theory
Human relations theory is characterized by a shift in emphasis from TASK
to WORKER
Go beyond physical contributions to include creative, cognitive, and
emotional aspects of workers
Based on a more dyadic (two-way) conceptualization of communication. SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS are at the heart of organizational behavior--
effectiveness is contingent on the social well-being of workers
Workers communicate opinions, complaints, suggestions, and feelings to
increase satisfaction and production
Origins (Hawthorne Studies & work of Chester Barnard)
Human Relations School of Management - Elton Mayo
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
6/32
Origins of Human Relations
Theory
Arose out of the influences of
the threat of unionization.
the Hawthorne studies.
the philosophy of industrial
humanism.
The uman Relations MovementPyramid
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
7/32
The Threat of Unionization
The Wagner Act of 1935 legalized union-management
collective bargaining, promoting the growth of unions and
union avoidance by firms.
The Hawthorne Studies (1924)
Hawthorne Works of Western Electric Company
1924 - Chicago
Research focus: Relation of quality and quantity of illumination to efficiency in
industry Four Important Studies
The studys results that productivity was strongly affected by attitudes of
management toward the humanistic and realistic viewpoint of the social
man model.
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
8/32
Industrial Humanism
Followed the classical perspective in the
development of management thought.
Is associated with the contributions of :
Mary Parker Follett
Elton Mayo
Douglas McGregor
Chester Barnard And others
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
9/32
Mary Parker Follett(1868-1933)
Attached great importance to socio-psychologicalproblems
Was of the view that conflict is not necessarilydestructive..it may be constructive also
Concluded that a key to effective management wascoordination.
Felt that managers needed to coordinate andharmonize group effort rather than force and coercepeople.
Believed that management is a continuous, dynamicprocess.
Felt that the best decisions would be made by peoplewho were closest to the situation.
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
10/32
Follett on Effective Work Groups
Four principles of coordination to promoteeffective work groups:
1. Coordination requires that people be in direct
contact with one another.
2. Coordination is essential during the initial stagesof any endeavor.
3. Coordination must address all factors and phasesof any endeavor.
4. Coordination is a continuous, ongoing process
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
11/32
Elton MayoConducted the famous Hawthorne
Experiments.
Hawthorne EffectProductivity increased
because attention was paid
to the workers in the
experiment.
Phenomenon wherebyindividual or group
performance is influenced by
human behavior factors.
His work represents the transition
from scientific management to theearly human relations movement.
He concluded that the rabble
hypothesis about human behaviour
was unfoundedElton Mayo
1880 1949
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
12/32
The Hawthorne Studies
Illumination Study(November 1924)
Designed to test the effect of lighting intensity on worker productivity
influence of human relations on work behavior
Relay Assembly Test Room Study(1927-1932)
Assembly of telephone relays (35 parts - 4 machine screws)
Production and satisfaction increased
Workers increased production and satisfaction related to supervisory practices
Human interrelationships are important contributing factors to worker productivity
Bottom Line: Supervisory practices increase employee morale AND productivity
Interviewing Program(1928-1930)
Investigate connection between supervisory practices and employee morale
Employees expressed their ideas and feelings (e.g., likes and dislikes)
Process more important than actual results
Bank Wiring Room Observation Study(November 1931 - May 1932)
Social groups can influence production and individual work behavior
How is social control manifested on the shop floor?
Informal organization affect employee behavior positively within formal organizationalstructure
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
13/32
IlluminationStudies1924-1927
Funded by General Electric
Conducted by The National Research Council (NRC) of the NationalAcademy of Sciences with engineers from MIT
Measured Light Intensity vs. Worker Output
ResultEach change resulted in higher output and reported greateremployee satisfaction
Conclusions: Light intensity has no conclusive effect on output
Productivity has a psychological component Researchers interaction withthe workers influenced higher performance
Concept of Hawthorne Effect was created
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
14/32
Relay Assembly Test Experiments1927-1929
Western Electric wanted more information
Harvard researchers brought in to analyze the resultsElton Mayo & Fritz Roethlisberger
Group of 6 Women(5) Assemblers and (1) Layout Operator
One ObserverExplained every incremental change and recorded results
Manipulated factors of production to measure effect on output: Pay Incentives
Length of Work Day & Work Week
Use of Rest Periods
Company Sponsored Meals
Management Visits / Special Attention
ResultMost changes resulted in higher output and reported greater employee satisfaction
Conclusions:
Experiments yielded positive effects even with negative influences workers output willincrease as a response to attention
Strong social bonds were created within the test group. Workers are influenced by need forrecognition, security and sense of belonging
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
15/32
Relay Assembly Room #2 - 1928-1929
Measured output changes with pay incentive changes
Special observation room to re-test some of the factors on othergroups
Workers were paid the group bonus incentives
Results
During nine weeks there was 13% increase in the output on averageper person
Conclusion: Pay incentives were a relevant factor in outputincreases but not the only factor.
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
16/32
Mica Splitting Test Group - 1928-1931
Measured output changes with changes in work conditionsonly:
Special Observation Room
Length of Work Day
Use of Rest Periods Workers stayed on established Piece-rate compensation
Result - Productivity increased by 15% over standard outputbase
Conclusions: Productivity is affected by non-pay considerations
Social dynamics are a basis of worker performance
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
17/32
Plant Interview Program1925-1932
1925-1927Objective Questions Work Conditions
Work Relationships
Yes/No Answers
1928-1932Conversational / Non-directive
Attentive Sympathetic Listening Concern for personal needs
Increased in time from 30-90 minutes
ResultRemarkable positive employee perceptions: Working Condition Improved
Better Wages
Conclusions: New Supervisory Style improved worker morale
Complaints reflected personal and/or social barriers that needed attention in order toraise productivity
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
18/32
Bank Wiring Observation Group1931-1932
14 Male Workers
Few Special Conditions Segregated work area
No Management Visits
Supervision would remain the same
Observer would record data onlyno interaction with workers
New incentive pay rate was established for the small group
Any increases in output would be included in departmental pay incentives
ResultNo appreciable changes in output
Conclusions: Well established performance norms existed in the group
Informal Social Organization dictated little deviation from established productionstandards Systemic Soldiering
Informal Social Organizations protect workers from managers who Raise production standards
Cut pay rates
Challenge workplace norms
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
19/32
Hawthorne Studies - Implications
Illumination Study(November 1924)
The mere practice of observing peoples behavior tends to alter their behavior(Hawthorne Effect)
Relay Assembly Test Room Study(1927-1932)
Relationships between workers and their supervisors are powerful
Human interrelationships increase the amount and quality of worker participation indecision making
Interviewing Program(1928-1930)
Demonstrated powerful influence of upward communication
Workers were asked for opinions, told they mattered, and positive attitudes towardcompany increased
Bank Wiring Room Observation Study(November 1931 - May 1932)
Led future theorists to account for the existence of informal communication
Taken together, these studies helped to document the powerful nature of socialrelations in the workplace and moved managers more toward the interpersonalaspects of organizing.
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
20/32
Chester Barnard:
The Emergence of Communication
Considered a bridge between classical and human relationstheories
The Functions of the Executive (1938)
Argues for . . .
strict lines of communication - classical theory a human-based system of organization
The potential of every worker and the centrality ofcommunication to the organizing process
Six Issues Relevant to Organizational Communication
Formal vs. Informal Organization
Cooperation
Communication
Incentives
Authority
Zone of Indifference
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
21/32
Felt that executives serve two primary functions: Must establish and maintain a communications
system among employees.
Must establish the objectives of the organization and
motivate employees. Developed an acceptance theory of authority:
Authority of a manager flows from the ability ofsubordinates to accept or reject an order from the
manager once they: Comprehend what the order requires of them.
Review the orders consistency with organization goals.
Perceive a personal benefit in obeying the order
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
22/32
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
23/32
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
24/32
Incentives
Should be available
Authority
Associated with securing cooperation for organizational members
The interrelationship among the originator of the communication, thecommunication itself, and the receiver
Authority of position OVER Authority of Leadership (knowledge &ability).
Zone of Indifference - orders followed
Marks the boundaries of what employees will consider doing without
question, based on expectations developed on entering theorganization.
Barnard drew attention away from formal organizational structurestoward communication, cooperation, and the informal organization. Hiswork was integrated by other theorists in the human relations movement.
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
25/32
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
26/32
Theory X and Theory Y
Theory X managers perceive that their
subordinates have an inherent dislike of work and
will avoid it if at all possible.
Theory Y managers perceive that their
subordinates enjoy work and that they will gain
satisfaction from performing their jobs.
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
27/32
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
28/32
Theory X and Theory Y: Linkage with management
theories
Theory X - Classical Theory
Three Assumptions
The average human being has an inherent dislike
of work and will avoid it. Most people must be coerced, controlled,
directed, and threatened with punishment
The average human being prefers to be directed,wishes to avoid responsibility, has relatively little
ambition, wants security.
Neither explains nor describes human nature
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
29/32
Theory Y - Human Relations Theory
Assumptions
Physical and mental effort in work is similar to play / rest.
External control and the threat of punishment are not the onlystrategies
Commitment to objectives is a function of the rewards associatedwith their achievement
The average human being learns, under proper conditions, notonly to accept but to seek responsibility
The capacity to exercise a high degree of imagination, ingenuity,
and creativity in the solution of organizational problems is widelydistributed in the population
Intellectual potentialities of the average human being areunderutilized
A more positive perspective of human nature
The KEY to control and quality production is commitment toorganizational objectives
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
30/32
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
31/32
Blake and Moutons Managerial Grid
Stresses interrelationship between production (task) and people
Managements main purpose is to promote a culture in the organization thatallows for high production at the same time that employees are fostered intheir professional and personal development
Managerial Grid - now Leadership Grid (Blake & McCanse) (Figure 3.3, p. 59) FOCUS: Mangers Assumptions about CONCERN for PEOPLE and CONCERN
for PRODUCTION
Concern for PEOPLE
Degree of personal commitment to ones job
Trust-based accountability (vs. obedience-based accountability)
Self-esteem for the individual Interpersonal relationships with co-workers
Concern for PRODUCTION
Use of people and technology to accomplish organizational tasks
Concern for is not about quantity or quality
Assessment instrument does not represent personality traits of the manager-- instead, indicate a specific orientation to production and people
8/13/2019 humanbehaviourschool-110911135000-phpapp01
32/32
Blake and Moutons Managerial Grid
Authority Compliance (9,1)
Classical theory
Country Club (1,9)
Informal grapevineImpoverished (1,1)
Laissez-faire
Middle-of-the-Road (5,5)
Compromise (carrot & stick)
Team (9,9)
Human Resources Approach
Promote the conditions that integrate
creativity, high productivity, and high
morale through concerted team action