2
Helvetica Five seconds ago I was staring at a blank screen. There were 120 square inches (774.2 square centimeters, 0.07742 square meters, 2.98920291 × 10 -8 square miles) of white space staring back at me. If you remember your art classes from grammar school—as you should—you know that this blank page is a canvas; and if you have a fantastic memory, you know that as soon as I begin to write, or draw, or paint on this page its vast whiteness becomes negative space. I have now—as you may have surmised—started writing, and Helvetica is cradled beautifully in that negative space. The story of Helvetica, the subject of Gary Hustwit’s 2007 documentary of the same name, spans over half a century. It is a love story, and like all good love stories, it is full of passion, anger, betrayal, and reunion. When Max Miedinger and Eduard Hoffmann created Helvetica in 1957, graphic design was deep in a period of dramatic reconstruction. There was a common belief in the design community that designers had a responsibility to rebuild the world visually as global political, social, and economic reconstruction continued. In Helvetica they found an elegant, simple, legible beacon of modernity. It was, and remains, the most beautiful typeface. In the film, contemporary designers note that there is an “inherent rightness” to Helvetica. Helvetica’s designers seem to have unearthed some fundamental principle of design as profound as the theory of relativity yet as elementary as addition. There is a certain sureness to the way the letters sit in the negative space, a solidness not found in any other typeface. Helvetica reassures and comforts us through its simplicity. It is just perfect. Helvetica’s conception launched a revolution in graphic design. Helvetica was itself a design manifesto. It laid out an unwritten set of rules. The type wanted to be used in a certain way, and designers obliged. Throughout the following decades, Helvetica fast became a banner of the modern world. The honeymoon was wonderful. We loved Helvetica, and Helvetica reminded us that everything was going to be okay. Though the continued survival of the human race was perilously balanced on the Berlin Wall and society was developing far faster than people could adapt, life would continue. And then, the honeymoon ended. There was a group in the design community that hated Helvetica. Helvetica was to them the blood-soaked standard of capitalism, authoritarianism, and the Vietnam War. These designers found Helvetica’s pervasiveness, its cleanness, and its conventionality disgusting, and they rebelled violently. One designer looking back noted, “They didn’t know what they stood for, only what they stood against.” The following decades were dominated by typography intended to communicate not through its legibility, but through its design. At the end of the nineties, typography had been so deconstructed, eviscerated, jumbled, and lobotomized that it couldn’t communicate. Throughout the New Millennium, we have witnessed a return to the design sensibilities that guided Massimo Vignelli, Max Miedinger, and Eduard Hoffman during the fifties and sixties. We have rekindled that old flame. We have found our way home.

Helvetica

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Helvetica

Helvetica Five seconds ago I was staring at a blank screen. There were 120 square inches (774.2 square centimeters, 0.07742 square meters, 2.98920291 × 10-8 square miles) of white space staring back at me. If you remember your art classes from grammar school—as you should—you know that this blank page is a canvas; and if you have a fantastic memory, you know that as soon as I begin to write, or draw, or paint on this page its vast whiteness becomes negative space. I have now—as you may have surmised—started writing, and Helvetica is cradled beautifully in that negative space. The story of Helvetica, the subject of Gary Hustwit’s 2007 documentary of the same name, spans over half a century. It is a love story, and like all good love stories, it is full of passion, anger, betrayal, and reunion. When Max Miedinger and Eduard Hoffmann created Helvetica in 1957, graphic design was deep in a period of dramatic reconstruction. There was a common belief in the design community that designers had a responsibility to rebuild the world visually as global political, social, and economic reconstruction continued. In Helvetica they found an elegant, simple, legible beacon of modernity. It was, and remains, the most beautiful typeface. In the film, contemporary designers note that there is an “inherent rightness” to Helvetica. Helvetica’s designers seem to have unearthed some fundamental principle of design as profound as the theory of relativity yet as elementary as addition. There is a certain sureness to the way the letters sit in the negative space, a solidness not found in any other typeface. Helvetica reassures and comforts us through its simplicity. It is just perfect. Helvetica’s conception launched a revolution in graphic design. Helvetica was itself a design manifesto. It laid out an unwritten set of rules. The type wanted to be used in a certain way, and designers obliged. Throughout the following decades, Helvetica fast became a banner of the modern world. The honeymoon was wonderful. We loved Helvetica, and Helvetica reminded us that everything was going to be okay. Though the continued survival of the human race was perilously balanced on the Berlin Wall and society was developing far faster than people could adapt, life would continue. And then, the honeymoon ended. There was a group in the design community that hated Helvetica. Helvetica was to them the blood-soaked standard of capitalism, authoritarianism, and the Vietnam War. These designers found Helvetica’s pervasiveness, its cleanness, and its conventionality disgusting, and they rebelled violently. One designer looking back noted, “They didn’t know what they stood for, only what they stood against.” The following decades were dominated by typography intended to communicate not through its legibility, but through its design. At the end of the nineties, typography had been so deconstructed, eviscerated, jumbled, and lobotomized that it couldn’t communicate. Throughout the New Millennium, we have witnessed a return to the design sensibilities that guided Massimo Vignelli, Max Miedinger, and Eduard Hoffman during the fifties and sixties. We have rekindled that old flame. We have found our way home.

Page 2: Helvetica

Five seconds ago I typed “We have found our way home.” The negative space steadily receded as Helvetica marched on over the course of the past half an hour. The blank parts of the page are all filled in. I could, at this point, spend several pages wittily deconstructing the act of writing, turning chaotic thought into clear symbols, but I won’t. At some point, you have to just accept that it’s not worth it. It’s just not worth it to break it down if you plan on rebuilding. Everybody knows that you’re smart; you don’t have to prove it. We believe in you. Everything has boundaries. It’s hard to break something that doesn’t exist. We dream about breaking the rules because, let’s face it, a world without rules is just about as boring as a world full of rules. There’s no romance. It is just too hard to explore a boundless space. If you just keep running and never stop to look around, you’ll miss all the exciting stuff. Negative space is great in moderation. Let’s just hope we’re never given a sheet so large that no one will notice what we create. I don’t think we should worry about filling up the page either. We can always buy more paper. Experiments are fun, but safety is important. We wouldn’t want anybody getting hurt. Credits Written by: Peter Stein Soundtrack: “Just Impolite” Plushgun, Plushgun EP Inspired by: Helvetica, Max Miedinger, Eduard Hoffman, Massimo Vignelli, Jeph Loeb (whose line I borrowed), Philippe Petit, and Mrs. D’agostino, my grammar school art teacher