17
Smart Grid Deployment Framework in the EU Smart Grid Deployment Framework in the EU – How ICT Vendors Can Benefit from Regulatory Changes How ICT Vendors Can Benefit from Regulatory Changes Ewa Tajer, Research Analyst ICT 27 th November 2012 27 th November 2012 © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved. This document contains highly confidential information and is the sole property of Frost & Sullivan. No part of it may be circulated, quoted, copied or otherwise reproduced without the written approval of Frost & Sullivan.

Frost & Sullivan Briefing: Smart Grid Deployment Framework in the EU -How ICT Vendors Can Benefit from Regulatory Changes

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Smart Grid Deployment Framework in the EU Smart Grid Deployment Framework in the EU ––

How ICT Vendors Can Benefit from Regulatory ChangesHow ICT Vendors Can Benefit from Regulatory Changes

Ewa Tajer, Research Analyst

ICT

27th November 201227th November 2012

© 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved. This document contains highly confidential information and is the sole property of

Frost & Sullivan. No part of it may be circulated, quoted, copied or otherwise reproduced without the written approval of Frost & Sullivan.

Today’s Presenter

Ewa Tajer, Research Analyst

Frost & Sullivan

2

• 5 years experience in Energy and Environment with special focus on

• Smart grid and smart metering

• Renewable energy

• Energy efficiency

• 4 years primary and secondary research expertise gained in both public

and private sector, particularly in:

• Existing policy and legal framework analyses

• Competitive environment monitoring and analyses

Focus Points

1. EU Energy Policy:

• Authorities’ Perspective

• Regulatory Framework for Smart Grid

• Energy Companies’ Perspectives

• Energy Companies’ Investment Needs

2. Main Regulatory Challenges

3

2. Main Regulatory Challenges

3. Country Overview

4. Conclusions

• Summary of Regulatory Challenges

• Energy System Transformation: Key Take-Aways

EU Energy Policy: Authorities’ Perspective

Renewable Energy Sources (RES)

Development

Energy Efficiency Improvement

Addressing the Growing Energy DemandReduction of Greenhouse Gas (GHG)

Emissions

Reduction Of Dependency On Imports

Security Of Supply Increase

The Current Energy Policy

of the EU(2020 targets)

49845-63

Source: European Commission ,Frost & Sullivan analysis.

Smart grid implementation will

result in global emissions

decreases of 15%

Smart grid implementation will be

followed by primary energy

consumption reduction in the EU

by 9%.

Possible output fluctuations have

to be balanced through advanced

low-voltage automatic.

* Compared to 1990 levels

20% Reduction in GHG

Emissions*

20% Reduction in Primary Energy

Use20%Share of RES

Smart grids have been recognised as a solution facilitating 20-20-20 goal achievement.

(Smart Grid—An upgraded energy network to which two-way digital communication between the supplier andconsumer, smart metering and monitoring, and control systems have been added.)

Poll Question

Which smart grid technology has enjoyed so far the greatest interest of EU regulators?

1. E-vehicles

2. Smart metering

3. Customer billing

5

4. Load fluctuation balancing

5. Smart homes

Regulatory Framework for Smart Grid

Directive 2006/32/EC

• Metering reflecting actual energy consumption and time of use (if it is technically

possible and economically justified)

• Energy bills based on actual energy consumption

• Electricity smart meter rollout cost and benefits analysis by 3 September 2012

• Timetable for smart meter implementation

• Obligatory rollout of electricity smart meters by 2020

Directive 2009/73/EC

• Obligatory assessment of gas smart meter rollout cost and benefits by 3

September 2012

Directive 2009/72/EC

Smart metering

69845-63

Explicit obligation – Obligatory rollout of electricity smart meters

Source: Directive 2006/32/EC; Frost & Sullivan analysis.

Directive 2009/73/EC September 2012

• Timetable for implementation (no obligatory timeframe given)

Grid automation/ E-vehicles

No explicit obligationGrid automation development driven by the changing energy landscape

(implicit obligation resulting from the directives 2009/28/WE and the Energy Efficiency Directive)

EU Energy Policy: Energy Companies’ Perspectives

Problems To Be Addressed Possible Solutions

Geographic expansion of the grid

Grid optimisation

More controlMore

visibility

More

accurate

metering

Integration of new energy sources and distributed

generation

Obsolete infrastructure and management systems

Trade and energy losses

79845-63

Qualitative Energy System Transformation

Two-way communication

Two-way energy flow

Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.

Distributed generation

Rising energy demand

Changing customer needs

Losses reduction

EU Energy Policy: Energy Companies’ Investment Needs

Integration of renewable and decentralized

generation

More reliable energy

supplies

More operational efficiency

• Grid monitoring and control systems

(especially in the distribution layer)

• Automatic grid management (Self-

adapting grid)

• Virtual Power Plants

• Outage management

• Work force management

• Fault prevention and Predictive grid

maintenance

• Fault location and automatic feeder

switching

• Power quality monitoring

89845-63

generation

Demand management• Asset management for grid

components

• Data analytics for more efficient

asset maintenance and investment

planning

• Smart grid cyber security

• Energy theft prevention

• In-home smart metering systems

• Billing systems for dynamic tariffs

• Metering data management

• Big data transmission and storage

• Proactive load forecasting

• E-vehicle communication system

• In-home power consumption

management systems

Interconnection and communication between grid elements as basic precondition for grid transformation

Operation technologies and ICT synergy as the base of the future business model

Poll Question

What is the main regulatory obstacle to developing smart grid?

1. Lack of minimum functional standards

2. Technological risk

3. Utilities’ business model

4. Lack of governmental smart grid strategies

9

Main regulatory challenges

• No binding standards

published yet

• M/490, M/441, M/468

mandates

• Smart meters:

Standards developed at

national level

• Grid automation

Technology Customer acceptance

• Lack of knowledge about smart metering benefits

• Financial Cost Of the Deployment

• Privacy concerns (behavior patterns)

• No separate legally binding document on metering data

Business model

• Income derived from

regulated tariffs

• Cost-benefit balance

• Poor state support

• No incentives for innovative

energy technologies

development

• Narrow view of cost-efficiency

109845-63

• Grid automation

Predominant standard for grid

automation used by energy

utilities (IEC 61850)

document on metering data protection issued thus far

• Poor knowledge about the composition of energy prices and tariffs

• Narrow view of cost-efficiency

(smart grid added value not

included)

• Tariff construction

Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.

Important especially for smart metering and demand management• Switching from one energy provider to another• Answering to price signals

Crucial for all smart energy investment

Utilities’ Investment Scope: Country Overview

• Renewable goal (2020): 49%

• Energy demand increase: 14%

Smart grid focus

Smart metering

DSO grid automation

E-vehicles

Smart homes

Sweden

• Renewable goal (2020): 15%

• Energy demand increase: 7%

Smart grid focus

Smart metering*

DSO grid automation

E-vehicles

Smart homes

United Kingdom

119845-63

Smart homes

• Renewable goal (2020): 15%

• Energy demand increase: 12%

Smart grid focus

Smart metering

DSO grid automation

E-vehicles

Smart homes

Poland

Smart homes

• Renewable goal (2020): 18%

• Energy demand increase: (-10%)

Smart grid focus

Smart metering

DSO grid automation

E-vehicles

Smart homes

Germany

*Electricity and gas smart meters

Summary of Regulatory Challenges

The legal framework for smart grid and smart metering remains incomplete and does not ensure asmooth transition towards a smart energy infrastructure. The most important regulatory challenges areshown below.

Standards for smart

equipment (including

communication

protocol)

Dedicated data

privacy and data

protection

Cyber-security

Minimum

functionalities

for smart

equipment

Regulatory Changes Required for Smart Grid Deployment

129845-63

protocol)framework

Definition of

market

participants’

roles and

responsibilities

Fair cost-sharing

model and tariff

regulation

Inclusion of

energy

efficiency in

energy tariffs

Additional

incentives for

investors

Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.

Energy system transformation: Key Take-Aways

3

4

Smart grid usually deployed according to either national (smart meters) or international standards (grid

automation)

Business model and uneven distribution of costs and benefits as the main restraint

2

1

Regulatory framework for smart grid deployment undefined

EU regulations as an important driver for smart grid, especially grid balancing and smart metering.

5 Governments do not provide strong support for innovative energy projects

13

Energy utilities need to closely collaborate with ICT suppliers

Energy System Operators ICT Companies

WHAT ARE THE GOALS? HOW CAN THE GOALS BE ACHIEVED?

Energy System Operators to define starting

point for the smart grid development process

ICT suppliers to provide dedicated solutions and

offer constant support

5 Governments do not provide strong support for innovative energy projects

4

Next Steps

Develop Your Visionary and Innovative SkillsGrowth Partnership Service Share your growth thought leadership and ideas or

join our GIL Global Community

14

Join our GIL Community NewsletterKeep abreast of innovative growth opportunities

Your Feedback is Important to Us

Growth Forecasts?

Competitive Structure?

What would you like to see from Frost & Sullivan?

15

Emerging Trends?

Strategic Recommendations?

Other?

Please inform us by “Rating” this presentation.

Follow Frost & Sullivan on Facebook, LinkedIn, SlideShare, and Twitter

http://www.facebook.com/FrostandSullivan

http://www.linkedin.com/companies/4506

16

http://twitter.com/frost_sullivan

http://www.linkedin.com/companies/4506

http://www.slideshare.net/FrostandSullivan

For Additional Information

Joanna Lewandowska

Corporate Communications

ICT

+48 22 390 41 46

[email protected]

Ewa Tajer

Research Analyst

ICT

+48 22 481 62 72

[email protected]

17

Adrian Drozd

Research Director

ICT

+44 1865 398 699

[email protected]

Cyril Cromier

Vice President, Sales

ICT

+33 1 4281 2244

[email protected]