February 15, 2011 Mr. Cliff Guffey President 7099 3400 … · February 15, 2011 Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers Union (APWU), AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington,

February 15, 2011

Mr. Cliff GuffeyPresidentAmerican Postal Workers

Union (APWU), AFL-CIO1300 L Street, NWWashington, DC 20005-4128

Dear Cliff:

Certified Mail Tracking Number:7099 3400 0009 0515 0428

As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review for the Binghamton,New York area mail processing study.

If you have any questions, please contact Barry Carpenter at (202) 268-6892.

JohnManagerContract Administration (APWU)

Enclosure

(CA2011-118)

2/14/2011 854

Type of Distribution Consolidated: OriginatingFacility Name & Type: Binghamton P&DF

Street Address: 115 Henry StCity: Binghamton

State: NY50 Facility ZIP Code: 13902

District: AlbanyArea: Northeast

Finance Number: iii••iiI•••••••••Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 137-139

Miles to Gaining Facility: 808 MilesEXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Walter C. WhalenSenior Plant Manager: Mark D. Dahlstrom

District Manager: Edward F Phelan Jr

Facility Name & Type: Syracuse P&DCStreet Address: 5640 E Taft Rd

City: SyracuseState: NY

50 Facility ZIP Code: 13220District: Albany

Area: Albany

Finance Number: III••••••••••••Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 130-132

EXFC office: YesPlant Manager: David J Mikolajczyk

Senior Plant Manager: Mark D. DahlstromDistrict Manager: Edward F. Phelan Jr.

Approval Date: September 24, 2009Implementation Date: Jan-01-2011

PIR Type: 1st PIRDate Range of Data: Jan-01-2010: Jun-30-2010

Processing Days per Year: 310Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,750

EAS Hours per Year: 1,825Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing/

May 27, 2009New Facility Start-up Costs Update 1----------------1

Date & Time this workbook was last saved:

Area Vice President:Vice President, Network Operations:

Area AMP Coordinator:NAI Contact:

Steven J ForteDavid E. WilliamsGeorge J FusaroJug S Bedi

rev 11312008

PIR Data Entry Page

Vice President Network OperationsDavid E. Williams

Losing Facility Name and Type:Street Address:

City:

State:

Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type:Street Address:

City:

State:

Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Savings/Costs

Executive SummaryLast Saved February 14, 2011

Binghamton P&DF115 Henry StBinghamtonNY137-139

Originating

PIR Type: 1sf PIRDate Range of Data 1/1/10·6/30/10

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less MalntITrans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Actual ChangePIR vs Pre-AMP

$1,929,601

$597,879

$1,811,142

($579,573)

$2,755,004

$0

$6,514,054

($15,877)

Proposed ChangePIR vs Proposed

$1,523,790

$425,677

$1,313,257

($429,222)

$2,368,053

$0

$5,201,555

$60,892

Total First Year Savings

Craft Position Loss

PCES/EAS Position Loss

$6,498,177 $5,262,447____9:::. (l.,;1:...1:.1) from Staffing-Craft

___---:1~3:.- --:7:... from Staftmg-PCESIEAS

ServiceFirst-Class Mail Service

Performance (EXFC O/N)

First-Class MailService Performance (EXFC 2 Day)

First-Class MailService Performance (EXFC 3 Day)

Losing Current Qtr

9628%

96.02%

94,80%

Gaining Current Qtr

9628%

___....:9:.;6:.;.....:1.:5:..;%..:::0 from Service Perfonmance & CSM

____9=.3.::.:.:.5:.;8:..0:.;Yo:..- from service Performance & CSM

Customer Satisfaction Measurement Residential atPFC level

Customer Satisfaction MeasurementBusinesslPreferred at PFC level

_________~9.::2....:%.::.0 from Service Perfonmance & CSM

_________-=-9.::.0..:.%:..0 from Service Performance & CSM

PIR Executive Summary

Calculation References

Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data:

Function 1 Annual Workhour Costs

Non-Processing Craft WorkhOur Costs (less Maint(frans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Costs

Transportation Costs

Maintenance Costs

Space Costs

Total Annual Costs


Total First Year Costs

StaffingCraft Position Total

PCES/EAS Position Total

Approved

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft Work-hour Savings (less MaintiTrans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings


Total First Year ~aVInIQS

Staffing

Craft Position Loss

PCES/EAS Position Loss

1st PIR vs Pre

~11

$405,812 OK

$172202 OK

$497,885 OK

-$150,351 OK

$386,951 OK

$0 OK

$1312,499 OK

$76,769 OK

$1,235,730 OK

20

PIR Executive Summary

Losing Facility Name and Type:Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Summary NarrativeLast Saved: February 14, 2011

Binghamton P&DF137-139

Originating

Gaining Facility Name and Type:Current SCF ZIP Code s :

Background:

Syracuse P&DC130-132

The Albany Performance cluster and the Northeast Area office have completed the first Post Implementation review (PIR) of theArea mail Processing (AMP) proposal that consolidated originating mail from the Binghamton, NY P&DF into Syracuse, NY P&DC.This first PIR used data for the first six months following implementation and annualized savings to determine if the Postal Serviceincreased efficiency by consolidating originating mail processing operations. The AMP was approved September 24,2009 andimplementation was completed by January 1, 2010.

The AMP affected mail from Binghamton, NY ZIP Codes 137-139 The originating mail was cancelled on 2 Advanced FacerCanceller systems (AFCSs) in Binghamton prior to the AMP implementation. Two AFCSs with the Vertical Filtration System (VFS)were deactivated at the Binghamton facility and the Bio-detection (BDS) was picked up by Northrop Grumman. Collection mailfrom Binghamton is cancelled by AFCS in Syracuse, NY with the postmark, "Syracuse NY 132". There were no other equipmentrelocations with implementation of the AMP.

After AMP implementation, Binghamton was converted to F-4 facilrty.

Financial Summary:

Total Annual Savings'Total First Year:

1st PIR vs Pre AMP

$6,514,054$6,498,177

1st PIR vs proposed

$5,201,555$5,262,447

The consolidation shifted an approximate average daily volume of 193,267 originating first handling pieces from the Binghamton,NY P&DF to the Syracuse, NY P&DC. There were 12 upgrades for First Class and Priority mail, and no downgrades. Periodicalshad 105 upgrades and no downgrades. There were 726 upgrades and 108 downgrades for Standard mail, and 738 upgrades,with 108 downgrades for Package Services.

Customer Service Considerations:

The before and after service performance is given in the below tables for Binghamton as well as Syracuse facilities:

After AMP

PIR Summary Narrative

After AMP

Transportation Changes:

Transportation costs went up to $579,573 against a proposed cost of $150,351. Three additional HCR trips were added, HCR13011, 13029 and HCR 14866 which were not considered in the approved AMP and provide much of the additional cost identified.

Staffing Impacts:

Based upon the first two full quarters of data following the AMP implementation, the annualized craft personnel changes aresummarized from the staffing comparison for complement as of the end of Quarter 3 of 2010 versus the AMP. Due to theconversion of the Binghamton P&DF to a Function 4 facility soon after the implementation of the AMP, the complementcomparison was completed including the function 4 craft employees, both for the pre-AMP period and after implementation inorder to provide a sound comparison. It should be noted that the function 4 craft on rolls complement post AMP showed anadditional 78 craft employees in the Other Functions category. Those employees are letter carriers and rural carriers on rolls andhave been removed from the staffing summary sheet. Appropriate note for the record is placed on the tab. The analysis shows adecrease in craft employees of 9 from pre AMP, and a net increase from the proposed of 11 The increases are 6 F-1 clerks, 5 F-4clerks,1 F-1 mailhandler,1 F-4 mailhandler, and 1 limited/rehab employee Complement reassignment and LDC changes arepending which affect the number of craft employees at Binghamton Craft staffing changes to match AMP proposed levels will bereflected in the final PIR evaluation. There were 2 less maintenance craft employees. EAS employees were reduced by 13 versusthe ro osed 6 in the AMP ro osal.

1 Craft: FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals


SOOs to Craft 1 MOOs+SOOS to Craft 1 SOOS to Craft 1 MOOs+SOOS to Craft 1

(1 :25 target) (122 target) (1 :25 target) (1 :22 target)

Binghamton P&OF 1 : 20 1 : 14 1 : 32 1 : 24

Syracuse P&OC 1 : 20 1 : 17 : 30 : 25

1 Craft = FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals

l Craft = F1 + F4 at Losing; F1 only at Gaining

Maintenance impacts:

Maintenance savings were significantly higher versus the AMP proposed. Savings amount to $2,755,004 against a proposedsavings of 386,951. Savings accrued across all categories at Binghamton and in building services, maintenance training, andstockroom/supplies at Syracuse. Savings were slightly offset by higher costs at Syracuse for mail processing and buildingequipment.

Space impacts and one-Time facility costs:

Costs were projected in the AMP proposal totaling $76, 769 for removal of an AFCS and relocation to Syracuse. These costs werenot expended for that equipment. However, a OIOSS kit was removed from Binghamton and relocated to Syracuse in exchange fora OBCS front end, and costs totaled $15,877.

Conclusion:

The AMP proposal to move originating Binghamton ,NY P&OF volumes to the Syracuse, NY P&OC projected a potential first yearsavings of $1,235,730 and the first PIR after implementation annualized savings are $6,514,054. Overall results reflect greaterthan expected work hour and maintenance savings to process the Binghamton mail volume.


Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurementlast Sav~d: Februal)' 14, 2011

Gaining Facility: Syracuse P&DC

District: 25Ai)§b~an~y============

After AMP

{1J

lNotes.===================

• C\...1""""" 9"~~flIctlQ(1I.lNl&ul~'neH lC5M)00Cll"'" C~'bp""~u........."men4 ",;>010 o..t~ 'efIeclB fTIOl<l r<oc~ ~jQ<J$(1",

CMoHalIS~l~l>ChC>n(o,..","E>.pe< ... rO'l

S"'''''I'IC!I(Jf,wllt1R''''''''''"''\liE~'''''...ltI\r~''Il)

S"l~"(;I",,, ",0;1"< Se<1Qr.g IE~~~" wft11<'\<<ilnJ)

S8(1IIW>::>nWott<~ 'r~"'M"dPOltq~",..-,lh"""'lhe<).><'Nly\,,~at!PO)

ll"nslllcHonw.n~ '~¥>I C<>f\lW _ USPS (E,P<'~r'(:"H1l1't ""I&l'~ c~Mi """h

l_hrlrla,~~tt...\!SPS

PIR Service P,mormQt1ce and Customer SahlllCbon Measurement

Combined FacilitiesWorkhour CO$t•. Combined FacllltleJ:

l.ut $Wo<t FM>r...y a 20\\

w-~~

SJI'J',a,w-----'"

-t7nJ11li1S

W

wwW

t«l,H'S- -------'i6T~>8B

$1115$70 ~21

:ke,069

~2S-5~~,~~~$4n'i71

$381,818

$3~,OM

$i66,~,

--s3'1S--t5{J~77'}

$~114i

S:WSB2$33,«2

- T{5i9325$207156~1414

~S787

W...,$1476'010

$.oWIl,4:MW

~--"----i16737;

S!H798S1,911.J7El

$HilHl-- 1370

·------i~m$2063e5

""Sn,9:1Jl-'$56015

W-Il&\ll

'108110siiiIiaij

w--~~-film

$BPOl

""'"W-_·~------""-W

$24%-4

w-----iOO:oii

S2182~

$179,031-~~&al

S<3,19'il$~7~

$10&8J

'"'"'"'"'"SO

'"'"'"'" '"'" '"., '"'" '"1<17121 $U;.Q::J.&1

S1tl.m $I}W2 ~--'$O

$211l1101 $Q

l<I347 $I)

'" '"SO

lO "!l0;l

~"'lll.tributIonCon'''''''d' Ong!nating

Workhour Costs ~ Losing FacilityLMtSfN\'Jd.~j·(:!G1j

$0$0

----~-------$O

$0$0

----~-$j)

10$0

----~-----------.w

$0____~__IO_

$010$0$0$0$0$010$0

$0 $0$0$0

$0 $0$0

'" $0$0

--~~

$0$0

-------~-so

$0$0------$0-$0$0--so10$0-----so

- - -- ---$0

$0

------~

$0$0$0

$0$0$0$0$0

-----$0

$0____M

PIR WctkhoUf CO!ll:$ - LOSIng

PIR WOfkrmUl Costs losing

PIR WOlkhaur Casts· Losing

Workhour Costs· Gaining FacilityL¥l~~at><""",j4:'Ojl

o.teR~ of Data ~-20HI

S53,.(2~

---$1~314

$7,559$0$0.,.""$75,147

"""$0

P!R Wotkhour Com - Gail'lirlg

"

$0$0$0$0$0$0

$1,6042,JlI1---,,--~- $0

$0$0$0$0$0$0

1.m

PiR WorkhoUf CostS· Gaining

PIR Workhow Costs - Gaining

Other Workhour Move Analysis

00' 12 0 0

'" "0" 0 56' ,'"'" """ , 21 '" 07>0 21211 20'" 7SO 92«72

'" .. .. 0 '" '"... '''' " 0 ... 1.778

'" '''' , 0 '" ""600 ,m OJ7 0 '" 0

'" \2,837 "" ,,"SO 153 3.013-450 0 0 '" 56' "0 0 0 0 " .. 560 0 0 0 ." ,..0 0 0 0 '" on0 0 0 0 ... ,...0 0 0 0 ... " ..0 0 0 0 '" .."0 0 0 0 10 10 ,., \3\250 0 0 10 10 ,.. ,,,,,,0 0 0 ".. "000 0 0 70S .., '"0 0 0 10 766 61ot20 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 $00 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 100 0 0 10 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 $00 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 $0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 so0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 $0 100 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 so 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 $00 0 0 0 0 0 0 $00 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 $00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total, 66.'" M,271 8.1,(2 S2.321,m Total, 171<.5.38 2M,a4A S",(;94,)211

699 3,(18 0 699 9151700 "'" "" 0 700 " ....701 ..... , 0 701 0

'" ,"'.. " 0 '" 4819

." 63" "" "''' ." le991 75-401

'" " ... " ... 0 ." "99 1J12a.4 .•7,. , , 0 7,. 0 0 $0

0 0 0 0 '" .... 56 100 0 0 0 10 '" 1676 '" 10392130 0 0 0 69. 12909 12 "'312,50 0 0 0 10 706 " J60 0 0 0 '" ,""" ,oa< 2G:B020 0 0 0 '" '" '009 , $18"'157.60 0 0 0 10 '" "" " 7960 0 0 0 921 , 900 , 100 0 0 0 10 921 .." 3411 $00'"0 0 0 0 '" "'"

, 12700120 0 0 0 10 10 0 00 0 0 0 10 0 0 $0 $0

0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 so0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 10 so0 0 0 0 0 0 so 00 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 so0 0 0 0 10 0 00 0 0 0 10 0 0 so0 0 0 0 0 0 so0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 so0 0 0 0 0 0

--0 0 0 0 10 0 0 $0 so0 0 0 0 10 0 0 '" so0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 10 0 0 so 100 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 10 0 0 so0 0 0 0 so 10 0 0 10 so so0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 so 10 so0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 100 0 0 0 0 0 so so0 0 0 0 0 0 so0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 so0 0 0 0 0 0 so0 0 0 0 0 0 so 100 0 0 0 0 0 '" so0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 so so0 0 0 '" 0 0 0

Totars ,,"" 11,CSIJ \,<Ie:::: ~_Z10 un,,. Totals ~7";) $AM?2J5

PIR Workhour Costs - Combined Facilities

'"'"$&69,21$1.m

oo

1,,",

0 10 10)0 '" 00 '" 0 $0 '"0 '" 0 $0 00 '" '" 00 '" '" 0 $00 0 '" $00 '" 00 '" 0 $0 $0

5m

Distribution to Other AMP Worksheet Tabs

6070so

"asToW>

,~,

~2..J16.4J7

~~2n

H?7.7g

$Z,OH"on

$116<"lO~

,~.n8

Sl,~H,e

lwJOO,711

HoGS,tIe

~,~n U17.t:J..l

~_Q17 . $101.756

S:tHS 18 ~7"Jl. llN>6,aJl!

SO,""'F ~ fun11;7

$'16_~

Wj,7V "rl>?4 ~H,g1

l_,}:lI3

$1(l1l!>4

n,'~ltl

fl.~1l.\"2

~&!ISol)

$~.'0<4.0$1

H.:n::-'.ollll

oT"'" '"'"

Summary by Facility

15,037-1)5315973G8

PIR Workhour Costs - Combined Facilities

Staffing - PCES/EASLast Saved February 14, 2011

PIRType:~

PCES/EAS Positions

Losing Facility: Binghamton P&OF

Data Extraction Date: 7nl2010

Une

(I)

Position Title

MGR PROCESSINGiDlSTRIBUTION FCLTY

MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS

MGR MAINTENANCE

OPERATfONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST

SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS

SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS

ASSOCIATE SUPERVISOR-DIST OPS

SECRETARY (FLD)

Totals

(2)

Level

EAS-24

EAS·19

EAS-19/18

EA$.-17

EAS.17

EAS-17

EA8-15

EAS-12

ChangoAnalysiS

Positions

Percent

(6)

Proposed

(7)

latPtR

(1)

-11.1'1.

21

20

26

(24) (251

PIR

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

0 0

t 1

0 0

t 1

1 0

1 0

0 1

2 2

12 11

8 5

2 1

1 1

0 0

1 1

Level

(20)

EAS-17

EAS-17

EAS-21

EA8-21

EAS-20

EAS-20

EAS-19

EAS-19

EAS-19

EAS-17

EAS-22

EAS-19

EAS-22

EAS-25

EAS-18

EAS-17

EAS-16

EAS-15

EAS-12

(19)

Position Title

Totals

15 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS

12 MGR FIELD MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS

16 SUPV TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS

18 ASSOCiATE SUPERVISOR-DIST OPS

10 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS

19 SECRETARY (FLD)

17 NETW:lRKS SPECIALIST

8 INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FLD)

7 MGR TRANSPORTATIONMETWORKS

22

6 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS

23

5 OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FIE


4 MGR IN-PLANT SUPPORT

13 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST

PCES/EAS Positions

11 MGR MAINTENANCE PLANNING/ASSETS

1 MGR PROCESSINGiDlSTRIBUTION

3 MGR MAINTENANCE

14 SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS


24

27

29

28

25

Gaining Facility: Syracuse P&OC

Data Ext:raction Date: 1n/20i0

Une

ChangoANfysls 1ST PlR \"5 1ST PlR liS

Pre- AMP Proposed

(7) (6)

Percent -19.4'1. -17,1%

~;_~_I_I '_"'_#"_"-"'-r-------(3'7j"_" ""------(3i)----_..-:! Total PCES/EA~ 1ST PtR .. Pro AMP I 1ST PIR V! Propo.ed II Position Lossi 13 j 7 I,--------------------~----------------~---------------~(Above numbers ale cerried fClf'f'llard to the EXflCutive Summsf}I )

PIP Staffing - PCES/EAS

Staffing - CraftLast Saved February 14, 2011

PIR Type: 1st PIR

6

28o

31

58

125

1st PIR

o

o

o

o

o

30

53

30

113

(10) (11)1st PIR VI 1st PIR vaPre AMP Pro osed

Variances Total On-Rolis

ChangeAnalysis

Finance #:

Total

Craft Positions

Thus 78 is being zeroed out In the losing site.

Data Extraction Date: 10/10109

Functions 67-69 - Lmtd/RehablWC

Function 3A - Vehicle ServiceFunction 38 - Maintenance

Other Functions

Function 1 - ClerkFunction 4 - Clerk

Function 4 - Mail HandlerFunction 1 - Mail Handler

Positions 9 12Percent 10.6%


Craft Positions

Function 1 - ClerkFunction 1 - Mail HandlerFunction 3A - Vehicle ServiceFunction 38 - MaintenanceFunctions 67-69 - Lmtd/RehablWCOther FunctionsTotal

Data Extraction Date: 10/10109

r----(2~-----r-----~)-----,

,1st PIR vs Pre AMP ,1st PIR vs Proposed,

Total Craft Position Losst J?L L :.: J(Above numbers are eamed forward to the Executive Summary)

Finance #:

ChangeAnalysis

PositionsPercent

1st PIR

PIR Staffing - Craft

Transportation· PVSLast Saved: February 14, 2011

PIR Type: 1:..:s:.:.t.:...P.;..:IR...:.-__

Date Range of Data' J::a::n:..-O:.1:..-.:2.:0.:10:.. --10 - Jun-30-2010

Gaining Faclilty:.s.y.raicuise.Pi&iD.C•••.-- _Finance Number.I.

(10)Voriance

PIR Vll

(9)Varionee

PIR va

(8)

PIR

(7)

30 30428,771 414,540 14,231 114,231)

0 $331,632 $331,632 $331,832

0

$0 $0 $0

$22,972 $31,988 $9,015 $9,015$1,993,465 $1,882,691 i$110,774}

$2,016,437 $1,914,679 (S101,768 ($101758

(3)

PIR

so so

$0 $0 $0

PVS Workhour Costs$0 $448 $448 $448 LDC 31 (617,679,764$0 $22,397 $22,391 $22,397 LOC 34 (765, 766)

$0 $22,845 $22,845 $22,845 Total Workhour Costs

(2)

Number of Schedules

Eleven Ton Trucks

Total Annual Mileage

Total Vehides Leased

Total Mileage Coats

Tandem Axle Tractors

Sin Ie Axle Tractors

S· otter!

PVS Owned E ul mentSeven Ton Truck!

PVS Leases

PVS Trana ortatlon

(11) Total PIR vo Pre AMP Transportatlon-PVS Savings: $252,719(ThiS number added to the Executive Summary

(12) Total PIR vs Proposed Tranaportation-PVS Savings: $252,719(ThIS number added to the Executive SummaI}' )

(13) Notea: _

PIR Transportation - PVS

Transportation - HeRLast Saved: February 14, 2011

#DIV/O

#DIV/O!

#DIV/OI

#DIV/O

#DIV/O

#DIV/O'

#DIV/OI

#DIV/O

#DIV/OI

#OlV/OI

#DIV/O!

#DIV/O!

#DIV/O!#DIV/OI

#DIV/O!

#DIV/O!

#DIV/OI

PIR Type: 1st PIR

CT for Outbound Dock:

losing Facility: Binghamton P&DF

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating

Data Extraction Date: 07/01/10

(4)(1) (3)

Route #

137XY

137XX1392913717

14866

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 00 0

0 0

0 00 00 0

0 00 0

PIR Transportation HeR - Losing

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

aaaaaaaaaaaaoooooaooaaaaaaoaaoooaooooaa

PIR Transportation HeR· Losing

ooooooooooooooooooooooo

LEGENDHCRDATA 1110

Change Analysil

Dollars

Percent

(11)

1st PIR v.Pre AMP

$6271325.1%

(12)

1st PIR vsProposed

($122435

NOTESThe Pre AMP HeR 137XY and 137XX were not implemented. The service they were to intended to provide was incorporated instead into HeR contracts 13717, 13011 and 13029

The Pre AMP Annual Mileage and Cost for HCR 13717 was changed to renect what was in the 31.09 HCR data fila The onginai numbers must have come a pnor data file and would appear to not indude fuel

The Pre AMP Annual Mileage and Cost for HCR 13929 was chenged to renect what was in the 3109 HCR data file

Pre Amp data extracted from 3,1.09 HeR data file for all routes

PIR Data from 7.1210 HCR data file

PIR Transportation HeR - Losing

Transportation - HeRLast Saved: February 14,2011

1302913011

Route #

#DIV/O!

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

$000

#DIV/O!

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/O!

#DIV/OI

#DIV!O!

#DIVIOI

$0.00

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/O!

#DIVIOI

$0.00

#DIV/OI

#DIV/O,

#DIVIOI

$0.00

#DIV/OI

#DIV/O!

#DIV/OI

(9)

PIR Type: Originating

CET forOGP:----CT for Outbound Dock:

(7)(6)

ProposedAnnual Cost

CET for Inbound Dock:------CET for Cancellations:

(4)(3)

Gaining Facility: Syracuse P&DC--'-----------------------Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating

Data Extraction Date: 07/01/10

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

oo

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

oo

(1)

PIR Transportation HeR - Gaining

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

#DIV/OI#DIVIOI

$0.00#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI$000$000$000

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI#DIV/OI#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/O'

PIR Transportation HeR· Gaining

ooooooooooooooooTotal

HCROATA 3.1)9

$268,632

Variances Total Annual Costs

(11) (12)

Chlnge Analysis 1st PIR vs 1st PIR vsPreAMP Pro oled

Dollars $264,141 $298,938Percent 87.1% 111.3%

Summary HCR Losing & Gaining

(13) (14)1st PIR VA 1st PIR vs

Pre AMP Pro oaedLoalng $62713 1$122.435oalnln $264 141 $298 938

(13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportatlon-HCR Savings:(from losing and gaining facilrties)

$326,854

(14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportatlon-HCR Savings:(from losing and gaining fadlrties)

Total Transportation

(15)

1st PIR vaPre AMP

$176,503

(16)

1st PIR vaProposed

HCRpvs

(15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HCR):

$326854$252,719

$579,573

$176503$252719

(16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HCR): $429,222(This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

PIR Transportation HeR - Gaining

Maintenance

Losing FacHrty: Binghamton PSOF

Date Range of Data:

Gaining Facility:

PIR Type': .c.1.:.;SI.c.P.c.IR.c.- _

Jan-01-2010 Jun-30-2010

Syracuse P&DC

1,6&4.721 $ 1,988,577

2,631,320 $ 2,218.858

783116

9,315,329

207.325 S 77.814

506.400 $ 500,456

1,018,057 S

10,336,192 $ 10,098,445Grand Total

Maintenance Stockroom $

Pads and Suppliell

-456,481 $

2,697,933 $Grand Total

Maintenance Stockroom $

Pads and Suppllell

(11) 1st PIR y! Pre AMP~ Maintenance Savings:

(12) 1st PIR ya Propo,ed~ Maintenance Savings:

($2,755,004)

($2,368,053)(These numbers earned fOrNard to the Executive Summary)

(These numbers carried forward 10 the EXfX:utive Summary)

(13) Not•• : _

PIR Maintenance

Distribution Changeslast Saved: February 14, 2011

Jan-01-2010 -- to -- Jun-30-2010

PIR Type: _-.:..::~:.:..:..._

Date Range of Data:

Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.

(2)

Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?

(3) 1/1/2010

Losing Facility; Binghamton P&OF

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating

Place a ..x.. next to the DMM labeling IIst(s)revised as result of the approved AMP

DMM LOO1 ---DMM L011

DMM LOO2 X DMM L201

DMM LOO3 ----DMM L601

DMM LOO4 ----DMM L602



_DMMLOO? ---DMM L605

_DMMLOO8 ---DMM L606

DMM LOO9 DMM L60?-_DMMLOlO ---DMM L801

(1)

(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts

FAST Appointment Summary ReportNASS Late Arrival o en

Month Losing I Gainin Facilit Code Count % Count %

Aug-10 Losin Facili 137 21% 31 18% 15 9%

Sep-10 Losing Facility 137 35% 41 23% 0 0%

Aug-10 Gainin Facill 130 10% 97 32% 27 9%

Sep-10 Gaining Facility 130 11% 132 39% 0 0%

(5) Notes: There IS no change needed to the DMM L201 labeling list as losing facility IS already covered under the gam,ng faCility OMX list

PIR Distribution Changes

(6) (7) (8) (9)Proposed PIR

Variance in1st PIR Relocation Relocation

CostsCosts Costs

4 $76,769 ($76,769)

2 $0 so0 $0 $0

0 $0 SO

0 $0 $0

0 $0 $0

2 $0 SO

0 $0 SO

12 $0 SO

0 $0 $0

4 $0 $15,877 $15,877

0 $0 $0

1 $0 SO

1 $0 SO

0 $0 SO

0 $0 SO

0 $0 $0

1 $0 $0

0 $0 SO

0 $0 SO

0 $0 $0

0 $0

$0 SO

$0 $0

$76.769 $15,877 (S60,892)

Carried toSpace Evaluallon and

OlherCosls

PIR MPE Inventory

f(l\'ltj~

_.....:.J:;:a::.:n-....:O:..:1...;.2:.:0:..:1:;:0__ - to .- __-,-Ju...n--,-3Q--..::2...0...10,-__

MPE InventoryLast Saved February 14, 2011

Data Extraction Date: 07/07/10 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data:

Losing Facility: Binghamton P&DF Gaining Facility: Syracuse P&DC

(2) (3) (5)

Proposed 1st PIRE ui ment E ui ment

AFCS 0 0 AFCS 4

AFSM 100 0 0 AFSM 100 2

AFSM-AJ 0 0 AFSM-AI 0

AFSM ATHS 0 0 AFSM ATHS 0

AFSM-ATHS/AI 0 0 AFSM-ATHS/AI 0

APPS 0 0 APPS 0

ClOSS 0 0 ClOSS 2

CSBCS 0 0 CSBCS 0

DBCS 5 6 DBCS 11

DBCS-OSS 0 0 DBCS-OSS 0

DIOSS 2 1 DIOSS 2

FSS 0 0 FSS 0

SPBS 0 0 SPBS 1

UFSM 2 2 UFSM 1

FC I MICRO MARK 0 0 FC I MICRO MARK 0

ROBOT GANTRY 0 0 ROBOT GANTRY 0

HSTS IHSUS 0 0 HSTS I HSUS 0

LCTS I LCUS 0 0 LCTS I LCUS 1

LIPS 0 0 LIPS 0

MLOCR-ISS 0 0 MLOCR-ISS 0

MPBCS-OSS 0 0 MPBCS-OSS 0

TABBER 0 0 TABBER 0

POWERED POWEREDINDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIALEQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT

LMLM

(10) Notes:

Customer Service IssuesLast SiNed February 14, 2011

Losing Facility: Binghamton P&DF

Data5~~c~:n ~:':: ';~;;-~~;;;:31:;;2:;;10;-------

1. Collection PointsNumber picked up before 1 p m

Number picked up between 1-5 p m

Number picked up after 5 p m

Total Number of Collection Points

Mon.- Fn

116

136

25B

PIRSat178

26

204

PIRSat185

39

224

Mon, frt

35

73

112

PIRSat

81

26

107

2, How many collection boxes are currently designated tor "local delivery"?

3. How many "loCII delivery" boxes were removed as I resutt of AMP?

4. Delivery Pl!rfonnance Report

% earners returning before 5 pm

Percent

77.4%

91.4%

86.5%

NA NA NA NA

Start End StlWt End

9:00 5:00 9:00 500

900 500 900 5:009:00 500 900 5009:00 5:00 900 500

9:00 500 900 500

6. Business (Bulk) Mall Acceptance Houra

---;P""ropotled--;---.,,.----"'PI"'R----,Proposed PIRStart End Start End

B:OO 5:00 BOO 500B:OO 5:00 BOO 500

w. BOO 500 BOO 5:00800 5:00 BOO 500

800 5:00 800 500900 100 900 100

5, Retail Unit Inside Losing FacUlty (WIndow service TImes)

7. Can customers obtain a local postmark In accordance with applicable policieS In the Postill OpennJon!f Mllnua/? Ye.

8. Notes: Syracuse P&DC


9. What postmark is printed on collection mall?Une1Line 2

syracuse NY 132Date and Time

P1R Customer Service Issues


Space Evaluation and Other CostsLast Saved: February 14, 2011

Date: __---=0c:..7:....:/1c=0:....:/1c=0 _

1, Affected FacilityFacility Name Binghamton P&DF

Street Address 115 Henry StCity, State ZIP..;B""in"-g-7h"'a"'m':Jto'-'n"','"'"N";;"Y7""::C13"'9'"'O"'2:---------------------

2, One-Time Costs

Enter anyone-time costs: ...;$0:;:::..

3, Savings Information

Space SaVings ($): _--.,;$0 _

4, Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain,

$76,769 $15,877(These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section)

-= $.,.0_ $0(These numbers carried forward to the Execulive Summary )

5, Notes Facility Costs include removal of DPRCS and 010 sytem

Employee Relocation Costs $0 $0 $0

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs $76,769 $15,877 ($60,892)(from MPE Invenfory )

Facility Costs $0 $0 $0(from above)

Total One-Time Costs $76,769 $15,877 ($60892)(Variance carried forward to

Executive Summary)

111

Product


(41

Gaining Facillty:...::S:..z.v.:.:ra::,::c:.::u:::-se:::..:..P-"'&"'D;;;C'-- _

YTD Range of Report: Jan-01-2010: Jun-30-2010

151

PIRCost per 1,000

Images

PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs

Documents

February 15, 2011 Mr. Cliff Guffey President 7099 3400 … · February 15, 2011 Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers Union (APWU), AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington,