LABOR

August 31, 2011

Mr. Cliff GuffeyPresidentAmerican Postal Workers

Union (APWU), AFL-CIO1300 L Street, NWWashington, DC 20005-4128

Dear Cliff,

Certified Mail Tracking Number:7009 2820 0000 8954 9391

As information, enclosed is a copy of the second and final Post Implementation Review for theManasota, FL Processing & Distribution Center (P&DC) area mail processing study.

If you have any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at 202-268-7412.

Sincerely,

/!i~Patrick M. DevineAlManagerContract Administration (APWU)

Enclosure

(CA2011-739)

Mar-31-2011

08·16·201113:05

Type of DtstI1bution Consolidated: Originating

FacfIty Name & Type: Manasota P&OC

Street Address: 850 Tallevast RoadCity: sarasota

State: FL50 Facility ZIP Code: 34260

District: SUncoastArea: SouttMtesl

Finance Number. _

CtuTent 30 ZfP Code(s): 342Miles to Gaining Facility: 51

EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Donald Shandor

Senior Plant Manager: James G_ Drummer (A)

District Manager: David M. Patterson

Facmty Name & Type: Tampa P&DCStreet Address: 3501 Bessie Cofeman Blvd

City: Tampa

state: FL50 FacUity ZIP COde: 33630

District Suncoast

Area: SouthwestFinance Number: _

CtuTent 30 ZfP Code(s): 335, 336, 346eXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager:senior Plant Manager: James G. Drummer (A)

District Manager: David M. Patterson

Approvat Date: March 24,2009JmptementatIon Date: Apr-Q1-2010

PIR Type: Ftnal P1RDate Range of Data: Apr-Q1-2010:

Processing Days per Year: 310

BargaIning UnIt Hours perYeer: 1,750EAS Hours per Year: 1,825

Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of8oITowlngI November 28,2008

New FacIIIly Stan-up Costs Update 1-------------1Date & TIme this workbook was last saved:

Area VJce President: Linda J. Welch

V1ce PresIdent, Network OperationS: David E. Witliams

Area AMP Coordinator: Steve JacksonHAl Contact: Barbara Brewington

PIR Data Entry PagePage 1 of 38

Approval Signatures

Pm Type: Final PIR

to Mc1r-31-2011

P&OC

Gllfmng I'w:IIIty ......Type:F1ldIlfr lIP Codlt:~~

¢tlrmJtSCF m-Code(IJ):

ImptemeRtlldon Date: 04r01/10--------Date. -..of Data: Apr-Q1-2010

u.Ing F...., Name and Type:~ZlPee.:

Fius'tc. NIlmIler.CunQt8CF 1JPc-.~

Typeof~Co..oRdl'ld:

~OF~AeIJTY-I ICNlo'I. thetl 1M ICOllUIliIIttlletor~n~ hlfleegri(y~aI~pcllltlIl~~.~~~ancl__~.OOIIlflllIIlC:edlQOl~~It f'Y",,*,1!IIIlcm~""~and~dfurlds. ........ .,...........40f1ll(~

J

LOSM FACII.lfY:

PIant ......r:Donald .$tlandor SAO!J.L

Stmfor"...~ / I__...:::Jatnes:::::':':';::;::;';:~:;:"t,_.::,;Orum~...,.:..::.mer:':':::..J!uA}:--_-:=:::::~~~~~s::::::::=-=~_l¢/~ ~

OIAict .....eY:

OsvIdMtP~

Date

t;!t11J;

~.Lu!. '. ilJ...

~iiiMii

DilJtrict .......:

David M. PaIelSQn

i'iAIlfWSFN:!JLlTYj

P1ant~

left Blank lnten~

»116Ii&iAIq VIM PI ••ld.fIt:

Und4J.W~

VIce P".sht_ Network 0,.......:

DavId E. WilIams

<:1 1.11.'

-------------------------------_....__..-

Page 2 0#38

Executive Summary PIR Type: Final PIRlast Sawd: August 16, 2011 Date Range of Data: Apr..Q1·2010 • Mar·31·2011

Losing Facility Name and Type:Street AddrllS$:

City:

State:Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type:Street Address:

City:

State:Current SCF ZIP Code($):

Savings/Costs

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings(less MaintlTrans)

PCESIEAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Savings

StaffingCraft Position Loss

PCESIEAS Position Loss

lilliS [ PService

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC O/N)

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day)

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day)

Customer Experience MeasurementOverall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level

Customer Experience MeasurementOverall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level

Page 30f38

Manasota P&DC850 Tallevast RoadSarasotaFL342

Final PIR V$ Pre AMP Final PIR vs Approved

$22,020,308 $19,459,225 from Workhour Costs· Combined

($480,747) ($480,747) from Other Curr vs Prop

$1,861,215 $1,410,821 from Other Curr vs Prop

$2,536,760 $2,518,646from Transportation HCRand Transportation pvs

$1,256,060 $1,100,170 from Maintenance

$0 $0 from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

$27,193,595 $24,008,115

$0 $0 from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

$27,193,595 $24,008,115

318 291 from Staffing-Cran

26 19 from Staffing-PCESIEAS

I I I III I.Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr

97.57% 97.29% from Service Performance & CSM

96.28% 95.06% from service Performance & CSM

94.12% 93.88% from SeNice Performance & CSM

88.3% from service Performance & CSM

83.5% from SeNice Performance & CSM

PIR Executive Summary

!illCalculation References

PI Iii 1J

Combined Losing and Gaining Faclffty Data:

Function 1 Workhour Cos1s

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs(lMs Maintenance & Transportation)

PCESIEAS Workhour Costs

Transportation Costs

Maintenance Costs

Space Savings

Total Annual Cost

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year

Craft Position Total On-Rolls

PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls

PreAMP

$88,009,213

$2,685,204$11,341,339

$9,000,162$26,095,701

$0$137,131,620

$0

$137,131,620

1,605

125

Proposed

$85,448,130

$2,685,204$10,890,945$8,982,048

$25,939,811$0

$133,946,139

$0

$133,946,139

1,578

118

Final PIR

$65,988,906

$3,165,951$9,480,124$6,463,402

$24,839,642$0

$109,938,024

$0

$109,938,024

1,287

99

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft WorI<hour Savings(Ie.. MainVfrans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Savings

StaffingCraft Position Loss

PCES/EAS Position Loss

Page 4 of 38

Final PIR vs Pre-AMP

$22,020,308($480,747)

$1,861,215$2,536,760$1,256,060

$0$27,193,595

$0

$27,193,595

318

26

Final PIR vs Proposed(Approved) AMP

$19,459,225($480,747)

$1,410,821$2,518,646$1,100,170

$0$24,008,115

$0

$24,008,115

291

19

Approved AMP

$2,561,083($0)

$450,394$18,114

$155,890$0

$3,185,481

$0

$3,185,481

27

7

PIR Executive Summary

Losing Facility Name and Type:CurrentSCF ZIP Codets):

Type .of Distribution Consolidated:

Summary NarrativeLast Saved: August 16, 2011

Manasota P&DC342

Originating

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Tampa P&DCCurrent SCF ZIP Codets): 335, 336, 346

was from the period from April 1, 2010 - March 31, 2011. This AMPPIR shows an approximate annualized savings of $27,193,595. The average daily originatingvolume for the Manasota P&DC was 382,519 pieces at the time of the study. The actual savingsis s· oposed savings in the approved AMP study. The reasons for thisare volume reduction from the before period at both ManasotaTampa and other initiatives that occurred concurrently with the AMP. These initiativesdescribed later in this report.

Total Annual Savings

Total First Year SaVings

ApprovedAMP

$3,185,481

$3,185,481

Final PIR \IS.PreAMP$24,008,115

$24,008,115

Final PIR vs.Approved

$27,193,595

$27,193,595

Page 5 of 38

PIR Summary Narrative

RETAIL AND BUSINESS MAIL ENTRY UNIT (BMEU) IMPACTSThere have been no changes to retail or BMEU operations as a result of the AMPimplementation. There have also been no changes to local mail collection box pick-up times dueto AMP. Mailers presently are able to deposit their mail through the Manasota P&DC BMEU asdone before the AMP was Implemented. A local Manasota postmark is still available from acollection box at the Manasota P&DC.

CONCURRENT INITIATIVES FOR FY 2010During FY 10 there were other concurrent initiatives implemented that added to the reduction ofstaffing that were attributed to the total savings listed in this PIR. These savings were not as aresult of the AMP. At the time of the study, both Tampa and Manasota P&DC's were excessingclerks from their facilities due to volume reduction. Other attrition including retirements was alsohigher then normal during this time frame.

In FY10 the Suncoast District completed another AMP project for Lakeland originating mail toTampa and closed an MTE annex. The MTE closing not only saved the lease costs buteliminated numerous PVS round trips between Tampa P&DC and that annex. This accounts forpart of the PVS savings. As a result of the Manasota AMP, Tampa gained staffing (15 mailhandlers and 9 to the Maintenance craft), and eqUipment (2 NEC cancellers). The first day of thetransfer of volume from Manasota to Tampa was March 29, 2010. The first of the Impactedemployees from Manasota reported to Tampa on March 26, with the final ones reporting onMarch 29. It should be noted that given the current PIR financial model format andimplementation timeframe, there will be some savings that are attributed to both PIR's.

EMPLOYEE IMPACTSThe movement of the originating mail processing operations had an Impact on staffing andrequired the movement of personnel as listed in the study. The AMP study projected a net impactof 27 craft and 7 management positions. The PIR shows a reduction of 318 craft positionsbetween the two facilities. Total Function 1 work hour savings was projected to be $2,561,083.The Final PIR indicates a total Function 1 saVings of $22,020,308 and EAS savings of$1,861,215.

MDOs+SDOs to Craft ,

(1 :22 target)

1 : 171: 18

Craft = FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuais

'Craft = F1 + F4 at Losing F1 only at Gaining

Page 6 of 38

MDOs+SDOs to Craft ,

(1 :22 target)

1: 171 : 20

PIR Summary Narrative

TRANSPORTATIONTransportation supporting the Manasota P&DC is exclusively HCR. Because of the distance toTampa, all collection mail comes to the Manasota P&DC for cross docking for trips to Tampa.Annual net transportation savings were estimated at $18,114 in the approved study.

The transportation plan that was in the approved AMP package is as follows: savings were to beachieved by reducing 2 inline stops on the 328AJ, one inline stop on 339KE and one on 339M7.An inline stop in Tampa was added for HCR 342CE. The following routesltrips will transport thecollection mail from Manasota to Tampa. Route 33551 will transport collection to Tampa at 1600and 1830 (1830 is modified from outbound 0230). The DOV for collection will be on 34265 leaVing1915 with the Express volume as presently done. Current non-collection mail (STD) on these tripswill be moved to later 33551 trips leave at 0001, 0030 and 0145 to leave enough space for theconsolidated collections. Tampa will transport overnight collection mail back to Manasota on route34265 leaving at 2100, 33551 leaving at 2215, 2245, and 0001. The Tampa to Manasota trips areall existing trips with no modifications to them.

This plan was slightly changed after the study was approved to achieve service and improve the2000 cancellation percentage for the AMP. The following HCR routes 328AJ, 339 KE and M7,and 342 CE were changed as listed in the work study. Additional inline stops were taken out ofHCR routes 33110 and 33512 to save costs. The HCR 33551 that was implemented waschanged from the approved study. The following routes/trips will transport the collection mail fromManasota to Tampa. Route 33551 will transport collection to Tampa at 1630, 2030, and 1800.The DOV for collection will be on 34265 leaving 1915 with the Express volume. All non-collectionmail (STD) will be moved to later 33551 trips leave at 0001 and 0115. Tampa will transportovernight collection mail back to Manasota on route 34265 leaving at 2100, 33551 leaving at2215 and 2330. The HCR savings listed in the Final PIR is $1,175,480. Of which $915,821 wasfrom the elimination of routes 339M7 and 342CE. Both of the routes were eliminated not due tothis AMP.

The Tampa P&DC has made numerous changes to PVS transportation during FY 2009, FY 2010and to date in FY 2011. PVS was not impacted by this AMP. The PlR shows a total PVS savingsof $1,361,280 which are irrelevant to the AMP implementation, as there is no PVS transportationbetween Tampa and any Manasota office. Each of the PVS changes and the savings areattr butable to streamlining operations and not a part of AMP savings.

EQUIPMENT RELOCATION and MAINTENANCE IMPACTSThe AMP study projected an annual Maintenance savings of $155,890. The Final PlR shows afirst year annual savings of $1,256,060. The primary reason for this is that Tampa had more than20 Maintenance employees less than authorized staffing levels plus other initiatives that were notrelated to AMP. The AFCS's were 969'ed and disposed of at Manasota. The VFS systems arecurrently still in the facility awaiting disposition.

SPACE IMPACTS/DAR/EXPANSION OR RENOVATIONThere are no expansion or renovation projects, or other expenses associated with this AMPstUdy. The Manasota P&DC facility (280,978 sq feet) and the land it occupies are currentlyowned by the USPS. This facility does not have any leases associated with it. The acquiredspace from the AMP is currently being cleared for long term function 4 consolidations.

IMPLEMENTATION PLANIn the study it was stated that if the stUdy was approved, implementation of the mail movementwould be accomplished in phases. After approval this was actually done in a single movement ofthe mail on March 29, 2010, achieving the required timeframe for implementation.

SUMMARYThis Area Mail Processing consolidating Manasota's originating mail into the Tampa P&DC,including the additional initiatives and other non AMP related changes; have resulted inannualized savings of $27,193,595. The total savings for this Final 1-Year PIR includes 1 year ofLakeland's originating volumes due to that AMP project. Both of these PIR's are sharing the sameexact savings from Tampa's craft, Maintenance and PVS reductions. This is inflating the actualsavings from each of these AMP studies. This is a result of the Lakeland and Manasota AMPstudies being conducted simultaneously but separately.

Page 7 of 38

PIR Summary Narrative

Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction MeasurementLast Saved: August 16, 2011

PIR Type:Implementation Date:

Losing Facility: Manasota P&DCDistrict: Suncoast

Final PIR04/01/10

Fiscal Quarter

012009

022009

032009

042009

Fiscal Quarter

OvernightPercenta e

95.28%96.13%94.78%96.59%

B,IliC f)lm '.h ,,~"',," ~ -;~ ~

Gaining Facility: .-:T,.::a::..;m.:r:p:.::a...:.P.,;:&:.:D:..;C=--- _District: Suncoast

Fiscal Quarter

012009

022009

032009

042009

Fiscal Quarter

032010

042010

012011

022011

OvernightPercent e

95.86%96.64%95.91%96.08%

. ' BXliCf)lm ,';.0"'~"", G ~ 0,",,""M~~

OvernightPercenta e

97.97%97.29%96.76%97.45%

(15) Notes: _

• Customer satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer ExperIence Measurement(CEM) In 2010. Data reflects most recently completed quarter available In CEM.

01 Overall Satisfaction (Overall ExperIence)

04a Satisfaction with ReceiVing (Expenence with receMng)

08a Satisfaction with sanding (Experience with sendlng)

012a Satisfaction with most frequently visited PO (ExperIence with most frequently visited PO)

016a satisfaction with most recent contact with USPS (&penence with most recent contact with USPS)

019 Likely to recommend the USPS

Question #

Q1Q4a

Q8sQ12aQ16aQ19

Residential TopTwo Box

88.3%91.0%88.4%85.7%571%84.6%

SmJMed Bus Top Two Bo83.5%89.1%88.2%81.5%56.8%82.9%

Page 8 of 38 PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

PIR T\'I>O': ;,,;:<ii:'i::;""...""0r.::&Li'ii==.-=_="C1iii=.."'....."""-....I CombIned Facilities I

T\'I>Oof~C_ 9!l!M!!!!l!!

Woridlour Costs • Combined Facilities"'_'-'-lG.2D\,

o.le RanQO of Ooola: "POl :I9tI to ...~.t1

PIR ¥\I'<ritlcu C<JIClI.~~

PIR _eosts· Comblned Facllilles

~'0N....

ijj

~Ii, ~

gi

•

~

f

~

~

! ~i '!

Is

Ij

PIR Type" -::~",i:'7'a",I:c.,pt';;~'""c"C"","",~---'-"'-"""-aI!z""-<d7'''''''''''F""..."",,ptR

(1)

Gaining Facility -,T!!.a'!;mpa=,-P~&~DC~ _

Type of D1.tl1butlon Conoolldaled OriglnelJng

Workhour Costs - Gaining FacilityLut SaYed August 16, 2011

Dete Range of Data Apr 01 2010 10 MAl 312011

Final P$R

$278.337$85,515

$692.286$76<

$789.820$1.7n.OOO

$10.111$0$0$0$0

$H87.138$2.6<1.520

$294.298$0

$259.<11$137

$11~.961

$0$1,639

$0$0

$380.065$2,371,27~

$0$0

$8~

~92,267

$0$0

$96.762$1.~52.826

$H01.703$1.362.1~

$617,266$1.718.081

$599.067$147.812$8~,805

$119,803$885.~

~8.381

~,~50

$0$79,673

$160.862$88

$0$0

$767.865$0$0

$161.683$0$0

$873.092$1<5

$398218$0

$8.679$61.291

$1.262.7~9

~~1

$143.150

P R \Nonmour Costs - Galning

Fm.t P1R

$0$0$0$0$0$0$0

$1,589,&«;$310,167$173,465

$1,0«.309$507.502$221.895

$0$0$0$0$0

$50.048$898.788

$0$1.233,514

$0$305,989$612,122

$0$75,303

$324.112$37.143

$237279$1,386

$0$357.707

$79,876$26,772

$896.642$1,904

$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0

$1,912,131$731,230$173.038$110,407$173.839

$58221$0

$2,823.051$6,090,706

$14,637$0$0$0

$1.914.294$1.475

$0$0

$7,804$45,090

$106$288,295

$0$0

$171.091$35.688

$0$0

$28.605$158

$893,970$1,174.182

$1.645$35,939

P R WorkhOU( Costs - Gaining

...... P1R

$3,247$25.419

$543$0

$4n.093$7

$00"

$83$47.239

$0$61.356$10.632$47.656

$4.049$178.50<4

$9.018$9.227

$13.851$661.644

$0$0$0$0

$10.970$0$0$0

$30.<411$0

$535.157$22.540$92.538

$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0

$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0

P R VVorKhour Costs· Gaining

I Otttervvorkllour MoveAnalysls ILosing Faclllty: Manasota P&OC Galnlng FacUlty: Tamp!! P&OC Dale Range oIData: Q.4/01/10 to lW31/11

Final PI" Other l.osingCraft VVorkhours I I - - - -

PlR Otlw WO<1<holS Costs

Totals lM,383 17~,5tl 17~,627 $7,823,~93 $7,380,480 $7,827,172

Page 21 of 38

Totals 492,676 500,032 463,640 $20,712,824 $21,045,730 $20,266,702

PIR Other Wo<1<hour Costs

10'10 $3039 $2 553 $0 $401413 $40141310 $579547 $486820 $267,343 $4172164 $4172164 $339634410 32008 $446867 $407577 $57914 $57914 9368901 $94 434 $0 $16721 $148 846 $148 848 $13382810 $249853 $166652 $125032 $446633 $448633 $27460935 651 $493 785 $577376 $1553221 $1553221 $201866310 $1436 $1436 $0 $0 $0 $070 $6438 $6438 $0 $0 $0 $080 $122033 122033 $285524 $210487 $210487 $23284750 78 78 $0 $0 $0 $030 $89822 $69822 $33106 $125788 $125788 $7863535 $94 813 $94 813 $100,801 $188506 $188,506 $57,67435 $ $1060 $1060 $0

7483 $47463 $0$303687 $303867 $399813$168900 $186900 $92337

$60758 _~758 ---.J£$0

$68$421

PIR 01he< V\\)r!<holK Cosls

Total. 54,711 ~5,OO6 31,963 $2,569,795 $2,l19,~Ol $1,&47,~15

Page 23 of 38

Total. 187,655 167,855 1~4,696 $6,771,~ $6,771,54~ $7,632,70'<

PlR Oth<lr Worl:hou< Co.l'

Totals 11.802 10,622 5,359 $<414,191 $J72,n2 $238,518 Totals 45,101 45,101 15,5014 $1,495,791 $1,495,791 $582,820

I Distribution to Other PIR Worksheet Tabs I

78', ':.•.•.•

Cps 617, 679,7M(31)Ope 70s, 7tl6(34)

781 "'~ .... t ... l .. l

Page 24 of 38

PIR Other Workhour Costs

$'$285,524

60708081

S4n.1$1,782

$(I$6

$0$210A87

$0

Pre AMP Com_

............. 1 "'""" """"""'" 1 """"

Proposed - Combined

".1:r;

17.9<r.:SW.~

·16.• '......-$1.077.1~

~,7.(7

4200.281-$654,421

41,861,215i

~92.303

-3

-71.35

~-27.1

~·11,2;;

-1".2\1

~

-33,891

-33.4SQ

~5,006

Fln.1 PlR to Pre-AMp· Ch.noe

~·13,813

-139,600-139

_""""" 1-"'-100....""'-'_"""""

-8.78

~

~-5.81

-$.2<11

-2.5QI.nw:-52,190,38

-2,790.38.

$480.7-47-$280.281

-$1.047,890

~-$1,.410.821

!3::-11

.70.8

~·24.1

·13.11

~

inll PlR to Proposed· Chlnoe

.l2!.!-13.81

-33.042

-30,em

-56.29'

~J9(

-1

"""""'- ,-"""'" """'" ""'- 1 -",-""""lustmentiSpecla--

$465.11

$3,165,95

$4,5<0,82

$38.395.3

$20,743

$9,480,12

837,63013,606

-471.886

176,661

66,425

109,2Si

""""""'" . """"Fln.1 PlR - Combined

$1,513,00

~$<t,821,1

$41.18$,71

$21,275,<

~46.648

964.220

~123,066

S02....232.953

$1.542.2

$2,685,20

$4,821,1

541,781.63

$21.397,74

$11,341,

47.497

9n.528

505.336

242.~

~123,066

S~sot'lCnlft JoIng OplTala

-""""P'\ffllo Mal.......... tab'

s

...Qthet Cratr~sOps QOlng to 'Tfam-PV$''Malnt~·Tabt.

Tran~Op:s (ooino toT~ tab'

00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $0

TotaiAdi 0 $0 Total Adi 0 $0

Page 25 of 38

PlR ou- WO<Id1OlX Costs

Staffing - CraftLast Saved: August 16, 2011

PlR Type: Final PfR

Craft Positions

Function 1 - ClerkFunction 4 - ClerkFunction 1 - Mail HandlerFunction 4 - Mail HandierFunction 3A - Vehicle SE!rviceFunction 3B - MaintenanceFunctions 67-69 -lmtdlRahablWC

Total

Data Extraction Date: 04110111

ffi! 11 7 11 • Hi lSI III

FtJIlCtion 1 - Mail Handler

Fwction 3B - MaintenanceFt.alCfion 3A - Vehicle SsMce

Ftll1CIiion 1 - CIErt

Data Extraction Date: 04110111 VarlancM Total On-Roffs(21) (22)

Change Final Pm vs Final Pm "'sAnalysis Pre AUf' h<>pO$(!d

Positions 201l 225

Page 26 of 38 PIR Staffing - Craft

Staffing· PCESIEASlast Saved: August 16, 2011

PIR Type: Fi'Ial PlR

32

59

(till

EA&-17

EA&-19EA&-19EA&-19EAS-18EA&-18

EA&-16EA&-15

EAS-17

EAS-12

41

3938

3635

Losing Facility: Manasota P&OCData ExlIaclIoo Oata _1

(t)

PCESIEAS Positions

3130

7J

33

52

5051

555&

58

.f6 -If-__

00

51

a.-. __.. _PIlI .........,... ,.".- "'-"<I

__ (1 (

-PCESIEAS

Gllfnlngfaclllr:.:,T-ea:::::::l:=. ..:..P&OC;:::.:::..,..,=~ __ "*-Oote ...-«

I T~~::~.:r: ;: I----- (ilDooot 101hot_so.-y)

PlR Stalling • PCESIEAS

Transportation. PVSlast Saved: August 16, 2011

$0$0

{$~$30

{$141,623}! {$141,623j($202,301

(9) I (10)Vanance Variance

Final PIR vs Final PIR vsP

o$0

(8)

PIR

$4,477,172

$112,540

$4,364,633

PIR Type: Final PIR

Date Range of Data: Apr-Q1-201Q - to - Mar-31-2Q11--------F~~:g:~~~.;...P&;;.;.;DC;;;..;;... _

$63,649

$01 $0

(4) I (5)Varlanee Vananee

Final PIR vs Final PIR vsP

$0

o

$0

$63,649

$63,649

(3)

FlnalPIR

losing Facility: M1ilnsso;.;;tl!l:;:.:P:..;&DC:;;.:;:;..;:;;.. _Finance Number: _

(11) Total Final PIR vs Pre AMP Transpoftatlon..p1JS savings: ($1,361,280){This 0Wlber added 10 the Executive Summary

(12) Total Final PIR vs Proposed Transportatlon.pVS savings: ($1,361,280)(This number added to the Executive SU11JfI18IY)

(13) Notes: _

Page 29 of 38PIR Transpot1atlon - PVS

PIR Type: Final PIRLosing Facility: Manasota P&DC

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating

Data of HCR Data File: July 2010

(1)

Route #

328AJ

339KE

339M?

342CE

ooooooooooooooooooooooo

Transportation - HeRLast Saved: August 16, 2011

CT for Outbound Dock: 2:30

(10)

#DIV/O!

#DIV/Ol

#DIV/Ol

#DIV/O!

#DIV/Ol

#DIV/O!

#DIV/O!

#DIV/O!

I #DIV/O!

#DIV/O!

#DIV/O!

#DIV/O!

#DIV/O!

#DIV/O!

#DIV/O.

#DIV/O!

Page 30 of 38PIR Transportation HCR - Losing

ooooooooooooo

Totals 1,238,510

Variances Total Annual Costs

#DIVlOI#DIV/Of

#DIV/OI#DIV/O!#DIV/Of#DIV/O!#DIVlO!#DIVlO!#DIV/oI#DI

Page 310138

Cbange Analysis

Dollars

Percent

(11)

Final PIR vs Pre AMP

PIR Transportation HeR - Losing

Transportation - HeRLast Saved: August 16,2011

21:30

2:30

#DIV/Ol

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/Ol

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DNIOI

#DNIOI

#DIV/OI

#DIVIOI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

(10)

Final PIR AnnualCost/Mile

PIR Type: Originating

PIR Transportation HeR - Gaining

CETforOGP:---CT for Outbound Dock:20:35

(7)

Final PIR AnnualCost

CET for Inbound Dock:

CET for Cancellations:

oo

o

o

o

oo

o

o

o

o

o

o

ooo

o

ooooo

o

o

o

o

oo

ooo

Gaining Facility: ...:T-=.a...:m2:p-=.a...:.P_&_D_C _

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating

Date of HCR Data File: July 2010

(1 )

AnnualMileage

age

Route #

oooooooo

Totals o

Variances Total Annual Costs

Change Analysis

Ootlars

Percent

(13) Total FInal PIR va Pre AMP Transportatlon-HCR Savings:(from losing and gaining facilities)

($1,175,480)

#ONlOt

NOIVlOl#OlVIOI

#OIVIOIHOMO!

#OIVIOI#OIVIOI#UIVIOI

(1.c) Total Anal PIR vs Propose<! Transportatlon-HCR Savings:(from losing and gaining facilities)

($1;107',386)

(15) Total Final PIR va Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HCR): ($2,536,760)(This numbef' carried fOlWsrd to the Executive Summary)

(16) Total Anal PIR va Proposed Transportation (PVS & HCR):(This number carried fOlWard to the Executive Summary )

($2,518,646)

Page 33 of 38PIR Transportation HeR - Gaining

MPE InventoryLast Saved: August 16, 2011

PIR Type: AMl PIR Date Range of Data: Apr-01-2010 - to - Mar-31-2011

Gaining Faclltty:....;.T.;;;;am;.;.,;,o;..;p8;;..P__&....;;O;..;C'-- _

Date Extraction Date: 01/11/11

Losing Facility: ..;.Mana;.;,,;=sota;;.,;~P;...&;;.;;DC;;;...;;..... _

excessed 2 OBCS and the total OUI'llbGr listed In final PIR is the corrected breakdown of machines, Added 2 NEC's fromManasota-all AFCS's were 96ged, excessed 1 OBCS..QSS and 1 OIOSS. Tl!lffipa-8dded 1 AFCS from Lakeland AMP,

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$i0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

sa

$a

$0

$0

$0

(9)

Variance InCosts

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0 I $0

(8)FlnalPIR

RelocationCosts

Carried 10Space Evaluation and

OtherCosls

17

ClOSS

FSS

DBCS

APPS

CSBCS

AFSM-All

TABBER

SBPS

UFSM

DIOSS

UPS

DBCS-OSS

MLOCR·ISS

MPBCS-OSS

POWEREDINDUSTRIAl

VEHICI.£

LCTS/LCUS

Eauioment

FC I MICRO MARK

ROBOT GANTRY

HSTS/HSUS

o

o

9

o

oo

o

o

2

oo

o

2

o

oo

o

..13

(3)

DBCS-OSS

saps

CSBCS

APPS

DBCS

TABBER

AFSM-AlL

ClOSS

UFSM

UPS

OlOSS

FSS

MLOCR·ISS

POWEREDINDUSTRIAL

VEHICLE

MPBCS·OSS

LCTS/LCUS

EquipmentAFCS

FC I MICRO MARK

ROBOT GANTRY

HSTS I HSUS

(10)Notn:

Lakeland AMP.nr..._"l"~,(.")B•."'VV V~ VI uv

MaintenanceLast Saved: August 16, 2011

PIR Type': ..:.F..:.ina.:.=.:...'P:.-'c...R:..-. _

Apr..()1-2010 : Mar-31-2011

Losing Facility: Manasota P&OC----------------Date Range of Data:

Gaining Facility: Tampa P&OC--'------------------

Workhour ActiVity

E Mall ProcessingEquipment $

E Building Equipment $

E BUilding Services $(Cuslodla/ CI<IanIngJE Maintenance Operations $

SupportE MaintenanceTraining $

Parts and Supplies

(3) (4)Variance

Final P1R FlnalPiR toCosts PreAMP

3,535,472 (229,269) $ 207,441 II LDC36

624;082 $ 625,026 il! (5,360) $ 944

--105.6721~1,569,714 $ 1,675,388 105,672 $_...._....._- ---

~554 $ 402,195 35,640 $ 35,640 11I1 LDC 39

~

10\1:823 $ 121,036 II (767) $ 11,413

-5'~iOO3 $ 6,359,115 (94,083) $ 361,111

Workhour ActiVity

Parts and Supplies

(8) (9) (10)Variance Variance

Final PIR Final P1R to Final PIR toCosts Pre AMP Pre

7'671.2~1 (SOS,3SS) $ (831.93G)

l1.833,07S r: (3&9,470) $ (37S,799)

3,871,897 343,539 $ 343,539

n2.811 (18,305) $ (18,JOS)

235,188 e' (10,745) $ (10,745)

---' ---14,384,211 (580,339) $ (893,245)

(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summa!}')

(These numbers carried fOfWafd to the Executive Summa!}')

($1,256,060)

~. ($1,100,170)

(11) Final PIR vs Pre AMP. Maintenance SavinQS: ---....(12) Final PIR vs Proposed. Maintenanr... Savina<::

-_--:.~--:.--:_--

(13) Notes: ==========·Oata in PfR cotulllfl$ t5 annualized lor First PIR.

m [ iI1iielIIRlSIR

Page 35 of 38

PIR Maintenance

Losing Facility : Manasota P&DC

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating

Place a ..x.. next to the DMM labeling Iist(s)revised as result of the approved AMP.

Distribution ChangesLast Saved: August 16,2011

PIR Type: Final PIR

Date Range of Data: Apr-01-2010 -- to -- Mar-31-2011

Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.

Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?

(3) Yes. April 1,2010

(1) DMM LOO1 DMM L011

DMM LOO2 X DMM L201

DMM LOO3 DMM L601

DMM LOO4 DMM L602

DMM LOO5 DMM L603

DMM LOO6 DMM L604

DMM LOO? DMM L605

DMM LOO8 DMM L606

DMM LOO9 DMM L60?

DMM L010 DMM L801

(2) April 8, 2010 Postal Bulletin 22287

(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts

FAST Appointment Summary ReportNASS

Facility NameTotal No-Show Late Arrival Open Closed Unschd

Month Losing I Gaining Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count % Count % Count

Feb'11 Losing Facility 342 Manasota P&DC 296 38 12.84% 91 30.74% 0 0.00% 258 87.16% 0

Mar'11 Losing Facility 342 Manasota P&DC 348 33 9.48% 83 23.85% 0 0.00% 315 90.52% 0

Feb'11 Gaining Facility TPA Tampa P&DC 15 15 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mar'11 Gaining Facility TPA Tampa P&DC 18 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

(5) Notes: ___._===========

Page 36 of 38PIR Distribution Changes

Customer Service IssuesLast Saved: Augus116. 2011

Losing Facility: Manasota P&DC

5-OIgit ZIP Code: 34260Data Extraction Date: -=04/-::-:-14/:-:"1:-:1------

o

PIR

Mon. - Fri., Sot.

P1R

o I 0

Mon. - Fri., Sat.

P1R

o

Mon. - Fri. I Sot.

21 I 3

40 I 92

P1R

305 I 266

244 I 171

on. -Fri. I Sot.1. Collection PointsNumber picked up before 1 p m.

Number picked up between 1-5 p.m.

Number picked up after 5 p m.

Totel Number of Collection Points

2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local dellvery"? [- 0 -}

3. How many "'ocal delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP? 1- 0 J

4. Delivery Performance Report

% Carriers returning before 5 p.m.

Final P1R

QuarterlFY Percent

Qtr 3110 97.1%

Qtr4l10 970%

Qtrl111 916%

QII'2111 93.1%

5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (WIndow Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mall Acceptance Hours

Final P1R

Start I End

NlA I NlA

NlA I NlA

NlA I NlA

NlA I NlA

NlA I NlA

NlA I NlA

AnalPIR

Start I End

1000 I 1830

1000 I 1830

1000 I 1830

1000 I 1830

1000 I 1830

0:00 I 0:00

7. Can custome~ obtain a local postmark in accordance with applleabM policies in the Paml Operations Manu./? Yes

8. Notes: A local collection box is set up for customers to receive a local postmark.

Gaining Facillty:...;T,,::,a:.:.,m:r:.Pa=..:-P.:::&::.D::.C _

9. What postmark Is printed on collection mall?

Page 37 of 38

TAMPA FL 335

SAINT PETERSBURG FL

04 MAY 2007 PM 1 L

~~~~

PIR Cuslomer semee Issues

Space Evaluation and Other CostsLast Saved: Augtnl16, 2011

Losing Facility: Manasota P&DC Date:__-::0:::5:!.::/0:::3~/1c..:1 _

1, Affected FadUtyFadllty Name: Manasota P&DC

Street Address: 850 Tallevast RoadCity, State ZIP: Sarasota FL

2, One-TIme Costs

Enter anyone-time costs: _ .......,;::;:........_ $0 $0(these numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section,)

3, Savings Infonnation

Space Savings ($) _-,;,=::,-,-_ SO $0(These numbers C<lrried forward to the Executive Summary)

4, Old you uWlze the acquired space as planned? Explain,

The space is being prepPed for long term plans of function 4 consolidations,

5, Notes:

Employee Relocation Costs $0 $0

Mail Processing Equipmenl Relocation Costs(from MPE Inventory)

$0 $0

Fadlity Costs(from ebove)

$0 $0

PIR costs carried forward to Executfw Summary)Total One-Time Costs $0 $0

m

Final PIR Coatper 1,000Image.

(0) (10)

Gaining Facility:..:Tc:::a:;.:m.:tp:;::ac..:P..,:&;::D::.:C::- _

FY 2009Range of Report

Losing Facility: Manasota P&DC

FY 2008

(1) (4) (S) (6)

ProductFinal PIR Final PiR Coat per

ProductAn<X:lated REC 1,OOOlmagea

Letter. Salt Lake C' 529,90 Letter.

Flatt Salt Lake C 529,66 F'...PARSCOA SaltLakeC $158<58 PARSCOA

pARS Redlteet. Salt Lake C' $3:9,16 PARSR-ed!l'ecta-

AFPS NIA NIA APPS

Page 38 of 38P R Space Evaluation and Other Costs