Upload
russell-chase
View
226
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Failed, because: Discriminability alone is not enough; code on speech needs to be compatible with speech. Minimally, must have the speed of speech.
Lessons: A useful reading machine would have to (i) produce speech, (ii) be based on letter identity, not shape
scan text with stylus, arbitrary complex sounds, 1 per letter shape
The Challenge of a Reading Machine for the Blind (1944)
optophone
Reading machine conception, 1969
Context-conditioned variability of speech perception
Nothing means something
Different things mean the same thing
The same thing means different things
context-conditioned variability
originally the problem, ultimately the solution
a
b
g
time
ƒreq
uen
cy
“BAG”
Co-articulation of gestures produces acoustic variability
Is speech perceived by reference to how it is produced?
Invariance is in articulation, not acoustics
Object of perception is gesture, not sound
producing any single phoneme involves ≈ 70
motor invariance must be abstract given that motor commands are variable
70 muscles of speech
articulation
phonation
respiration
Dynamics of self-organization, intrinsic timing, articulatory phonology Basic phonological unit: articulatory
gesture, a dynamical system with a characteristic set of parameter values.
tract variables articulators
constrictions variable in location, degree
“planning” dynamics
“execution” dynamicscoordinate
transformation
An utterance: an ensemble of potentially overlapping gestural units
intended gestures
articulatory dynamics
perceive gestures
[Phonetic Module]
habituation continues
habituation dishabituation
No. of Sucks per minute
Time
3 mos
Categorical Speech Perception in Infants
Initial babbling: all phonemes (Dutch, Zulu, Farsi, …)
La La La
1st year
Ra RaLa La
8 mos
No. of Sucks per minute
Time
La La La Ra RaLa La
habituation
•Experiment with Japanese babies:
•Growing sensitivity to native phonemes and insensitivity to non-native phonemes
La ≠ Ra
La Ra
Can’t distinguish letters, a visual perception problem?
Can’t register order of letters and words, a visual representation problem?
Can’t scan letters and words properly, an eye control problem?
Why might a child have difficulty reading?
Can’t hear the sound contrasts that distinguish words, an auditory perception problem?
Can’t link letters to their speech sounds, an associative learning problem?
Can’t learn the spelling rules, an (English) orthography problem?
/b/
/a/
/g/
“BAG”
time
ƒreq
uen
cy
sound energy
/a/ throughout /b/ first 2/3 /g/ last 2/3
/a/, /b/, /g/ overlap in middle
Haskins’s answer:reading is hard
because speech is easy
Can’t explicitly segment words into phonemes, a phonological awareness problem?
Would-be-reader’s challenge: Gain awareness that spoken words break apart into distinct abstract segments (phonemes)Then: Has basis for learning that letters stand for phonemes—the meaningless elements that make up the words of the spoken language. The Alphabet Principle
Does phonology’s role in reading depend on the writing system? (orthographic depth hypothesis; Serbo-Croatian, Hebrew, English,
Chinese)
Phonological Coherence HypothesisUniversal Phonological Principle
word or
nonword?
fluent bi-alphabetical reader
component circuits, hypothesized roles
phonological
sem
antic
visual word form
Can we reveal the reading network through fMRI and related tools?
Can we reveal improvement in an under-engaged network with training?
Normal
Dyslexic
rhyming task
phonological
training