Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11
Environmental Health Impacts of Ethanol Production
The Good, The Bad, and Future Solutions
Felicia Wu, PhDDepartment of Environmental & Occupational Health
Graduate School of Public Health
University of Pittsburgh
Sigma Xi Chapter, University of Nebraska, 29 October 2008
22
Presentation outline
Guiding questions:
How do environmental impacts of ethanol production & use compare with those of gasoline?
What solutions & alternatives exist?
Broad-based survey of ethanol & the environment
Current state of energy
Ethanol: background
Environmental impacts of corn-based ethanol production
Alternatives & potential solutions
Current state of energy: Global & US
Production
Demand increasing, supply decreasing
US energy use & imports
44
Crude oil: Global production
Improved living standards worldwide increasing reliance on finite oil reserves for transportation, heating, industry “Finite” – new oil forms in geological time-scales
Total production mirrors total consumption: 30B bbls/yr At this rate, proved reserves will deplete in 40 years
McLaren 2008
5
Crude oil: US trends
U.S. largest global user of oil energy (albeit efficiently)
Increasingly, we rely on imported crude oil
High % import from politically unstable regions
Security of future energy supply crucial policy issue
McLaren 2008
Gasoline prices increased dramatically since 1990s
Oil price affects agricultural production costs
2007: high petroleum costs affect US ag. expenditures (USDA 2008)
Petroleum fuel, fertilizers, chemicals, transportation, crop prices
Total cost % increase
from 2006
US farm production
expenditures (total)
$260 billion 9.3%
Per farm:
Fertilizer, lime, soil $8,070 26%
Feed $18,412 22%
Fuel $6,137 15%
Agricultural chemicals $4,832 12%
88
… so US government looks to renewable fuels such as ethanol
“America is addicted to oil.” -President Bush, 2006 State of the Union Address
Background on ethanol
What is ethanol?
Ethanol production trends in US
Ethanol use in vehicles
US policies supportive of ethanol
99
Ethanol: background
Pure alcohol, grain alcohol, drinking alcohol
Fermentation of sugar into ethanol “earliest organic reaction known to humanity”
Uses Consumption
Flavorings & scents
Medicines
Solvent in chemistry
FUEL (98% from corn)
2007
actual
2015
expected
2020
potential
Ethanol produced
(B gal)6.2 15.0 20.0
Corn yield (bu/A) 151 180 200
Corn produced
(Mbu)13,062 16,200 18,000
Corn used for
ethanol1670
(13%)
3866
(24%)
5150
(29%)
Corn available
for other uses
(Mbu)
11,392 12,334 12,850
1010
Corn-based ethanol production in U.S. (millions of gallons)
U.S. goal: 15 x 15 x 15 (yield, ethanol, 2015)
1 bu corn yields 2.7 gallons ethanol: 2.3B bu corn in 2007
11
Existing & planned ethanol plants
Today: 134 existing plants; 77 under construction
12
Ethanol doesn‟t replace gasoline…
… but complements it
Flex-fuel vehicles (FFV): 0-85% ethanol mixed with gasoline
E.g., E10 (10% ethanol, 90% gasoline), E85 ~7.3 million US cars in use compatible
with E85 (out of 65 million)
68% Americans didn‟t know they owned E85 FFV (2005 survey)
~13.7 million E85 FFVs in Brazil
Gasoline-powered cars can use E10
Ford Model T: Earliest FFV
Modern US postal FFV (E85)
Policy support for ethanol
2007 “20-in-10” initiative:
Reduce gasoline consumption by 20% in 10 years
Subsidies: $0.51/gal (now $0.45/gal) tax credit to refiners
Congressional mandates to produce:
4B gallons by 2006, 7.5B gallons by 2012
Recent legislation: 36B gallons by 2022
DOT: Fuel-economy compliance credits for new E85 vehicles
E.g., Chevy S-10 that gets 25 mpg counted for federal compliance purposes as if it gets 40 mpg
2007: Portland, OR: 1st city to require all gasoline sold within city limits contain ≥10% ethanol
Jan 2008: 3 states require ethanol blends: MO, MN, HI
13
National Biofuels Action Plan (USDA/DOE)
Released Oct. 7, 2008
Interagency Biomass R&D Board focuses on 7 Action Areas:
Sustainability
Feedstock production
Feedstock logistics
Conversion science & technology
Distribution infrastructure
Blending
Environment, health & safety
Many of these areas have strong environmental component
15
Environmental health impacts of corn-based ethanol production
Food supply
Air quality
Soil & water quality
Energy use
Carbon emissions
Animal feed quality
16
Food vs. fuel debate
“Does corn ethanol compromise food supply?”
Not in US…
Most US corn production animal feed
Corn for human consumption: high-fructose corn syrup
5-10% increase in meat prices (Dale 2008)
…But possibly in poorer, corn-trading nations
Food corn same type as US animal feed
High food prices Feb 2007 Mexico riot over tortilla price
Food demand will double in 50 years (Tilman 2007)
Population increases to 9 billion & meat consumption increases
1717
Increased meat consumption in China & India
1 lb meat requires 10 lbs vegetable ~90% corn, 10% soybean meal
“Middle class” growing
Statistics: China: 1.33 billion people
India: 1.15 billion people
If each person ate 3 lbs more meat/yr, would need 67 billion lbs more corn 1.2 billion bushels
~10% of U.S. corn production
High all-around demand for corn will raise prices
Other factors also account for increased food prices
Higher fuel prices: increased
input & transportation costs
Increased food demand as
people in developing
countries improve diets
2 years of drought: poor
harvest in some world
regions
Food commodity prices rose >60%
in last 2 years. Index: Jan 1992 = 100.
19
Air quality & health(excluding CO2)
Air pollution 7th-leading cause of death worldwide (WHO 2008)
Effects of ethanol (E85) vs. gasoline vehicles Ethanol use increases:
Ozone (2.14X as much as gasoline!)
Acetaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Ethanol use decreases: CO
NO2, SO2
Benzene
Butadiene
No significant change in particulate matter
If Los Angeles E85 vehicles (Jacobson 2007): 9% increase in ozone-related mortality! (asthma, bronchitis, heart attack)
No decrease in NO2, SO2, benzene / butadiene-related illness (e.g., leukemia)
20
Soil & water quality
Soil overuse: erosion, nitrogen depletion
Water use 1 gal ethanol production requires 3-5 gal water
Problem for ethanol plants in arid locations
Irrigating new dedicated fields needs massive amounts of water
Water quality: runoff of pesticides and fertilizers >1000 kg nitrogen fertilizer / km2 corn into Mississippi
River (Schnoor 2008) Hypoxia in Gulf of Mexico: reduced O2 fewer fish, shrimp, crabs
21
“Carbon neutrality” and biofuels
Main concern: Carbon dioxide‟s contribution to global warming
Carbon neutral: New Oxford American Dictionary‟s Word of the Year, 2006 Carbon emissions from fuel consumption offset by carbon
capture & sequestration (e.g., by planting crops)
Growing plants remove CO2 from air
Carbon in plants turned into biofuel (e.g., ethanol)
When biofuel combusted, CO2 released back into air
If made properly, biofuels can be carbon neutral
Per unit energy, ethanol trumps gasoline (Farrell et al. 2006)
Net fossil
input
Net fossil ratio Petroleum
input
GHG
emissions
MJfossil needed
for each
MJfuel
MJfuel made for
each MJfossil
input
MJpetroleum
needed for
each MJfuel
g CO2 emitted
per MJfuel
Gasoline 1.19 0.84 1.10 94
Corn
ethanol
0.77 1.30 0.04 77
Cellulosic
ethanol
0.10 10.0 0.08 11
23
Biofuels & carbon debt:Land use change
Land in undisturbed ecosystems (esp. Americas & Asia) converted to:
Biofuel production
Food production, when agricultural land used for biofuel
Converting native habitats to cropland releases CO2 by burning plants & soils
~50 years: decay of leaves & roots further releases CO2
This is “carbon debt”
Over time, biofuels on converted land can repay carbon debts, if their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are less than GHG emissions of fossil fuels they displace.
24
How many years for biofuels to repay carbon debt?
Ethanol production
type (Searchinger et
al. 2008)
# years of
increased
GHGs
Corn-based 167
Corn-based, improved
yield & tech34
Switchgrass-based (corn
land)52
Brazilian sugarcane
(tropical rain forest)45
Brazilian sugarcane
(grazing land)4
Ethanol production
type (Fargione et
al. 2008)
# years of
increased
GHGs
Corn-based (central
grassland)93
Corn-based
(abandoned land)48
Switchgrass-based
(marginal
cropland)
0
Brazilian sugarcane
(wooded land)17
2525
Ethanol production impacts on animal feed quality
Ethanol produced from corn Mycotoxins (toxins of fungal origin) concentrated up to 3X in co-products
90% co-products fed to livestock & poultry in animal feed
Usually as Dried Distillers Grains plus Solubles (DDGS)
What is the impact to animal health?
26
Mycotoxins of concern in corn
Fumonisin Fusarium verticillioides, F. proliferatum
Aflatoxin Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus
Deoxynivalenol (DON,
vomitoxin)
F. graminearum, F. culmorum
Zearalenone F. graminearum, F. culmorum
Left to right:
Fusarium ear rot,
Gibberella ear rot,
Aspergillus ear rot
(photos: Gary Munkvold)
Multiple adverse animal health effects
27
DDGS risk to animals
Impact to livestock industry ~$10 millions annually in reduced animal weight alone
(Wu F, Munkvold GP, J. Agric. Food Chem 56:3900-3911, 2008)
But not much economic incentive to change this
Ethanol plants want to sell DDGS to livestock producers…
10-20% revenues come from DDGS: $1.5 billion in 2006
Significant source of revenue for ethanol plants
… and livestock producers want to keep buying it
High corn price turn to cheaper feedstuffs
Currently, DDGS cheap: ~85% of cost of corn
Summary: Environmental impacts of corn ethanol, compared to gasoline
Food supply Both implicated in higher food prices:
Potential risk in poorer nations
Air quality Increased respiratory mortality & morbidity
Water use &
quality
Similar water use, risks to water quality from
increased runoff
Energy use Per unit improvement over gasoline
GHG emissions Over time, will result in lower emissions
Animal feed Potentially increased mycotoxin risk
29
Corn growers already adopting environmental solutions…
No-till farming
Slows erosion, builds soil organic
matter
Advanced fertilizer technology
Improves crop nitrogen capture
Cover crops
Sequester soil carbon, intercept
nitrate & phosphorus runoff
Crop genetic improvements
Reduce pesticides & mycotoxins,
can increase stress tolerance &
nutrient efficiency
Beneficiaries:
Corn growers: lower input
costs
Ethanol plants: lower
grain costs
Environmental sectors:
reduced chemicals
reduced hypoxia & water
pollution, more efficient
land & water use
30
Lignocellulosic ethanol:Introduction
“Lignocellulosic”: biomass composed of cellulose, hemi-
cellulose (carbohydrates), & lignin (cell wall component)
Can be converted to ethanol
Sources
Agricultural residues (e.g., corn stovers, wheat straw)
Dedicated energy crops: switchgrass, hybrid poplars (cottonwoods),
hybrid willows
Wood residues (e.g., sawmill & papermill discards)
Municipal paper waste
31
Lignocellulosic ethanol production(Image source: DOE 2008)
Barriers to ethanol production
Sugars for fermentation trapped inside lignocellulose
High % of pentose vs. hexose in hemicellulose: difficult to ferment
Solutions
Pretreatment: open cell wall materials for enzymatic attack
Enzymatic hydrolysis (cellulase): converts cell walls to sugars
Fermentation: to convert sugars to ethanol engineered yeast to degrade pentose
Energy return on investment for ethanol
rE = ratio of energy in a gallon of ethanol to the
nonrenewable energy required to make it
rE = Eout / Ein,nonrenewable
rE always < 1 for nonrenewables like gasoline: at least some gross
energy input is lost when refining energy product
If rE > 1, we‟ve captured some renewable energy value
If rE > 0.76, it consumes less nonrenewable energy than gasoline
Meta-analysis of ethanol studies (Hammerschlag 2006):
0.84 ≤ rE ≤ 1.65 for corn-based ethanol
4.40 ≤ rE ≤ 6.61 for cellulosic ethanol
32
33
Lignocellulosic ethanol: Promises
May 2008 Farm Bill: subsidies for cellulosic ethanol Refiners: $1.01 / gallon
Growers: $45 / ton of biomass
Potential environmental benefits: Can grow cellulosic crops on marginal lands
Reduces (doesn‟t completely solve) “food vs. fuel” dilemma
Perennial crops do not have high water / pesticide / fertilizer requirements
Reduces GHG emissions
34
Lignocellulosic ethanol: Potential issues
Logistics: Harvesting, storage, preprocessing / grinding, transportation ~20% of current cost
What to do with co-products?
Animals can‟t eat wood / paper residues
Ethanol plants prefer to make profit from all parts of feedstocks
Even dedicated crops pose environmental concerns
Use of marginal land can destroy biodiversity
Some proposed crops are exotic or invasive: further threats to local biodiversity
“Food vs. fuel”: if profitable enough, may displace food crops
Win-win: Alternatives & potential technology / policy solutions
How to achieve environmental quality without
making any sector worse off? Solutions in:
Transgenic (genetically modified) crops
Alternative biofuels
Improved conversion processes
Other renewable energy sources
More energy-efficient lifestyles
35
36
Transgenics: Bt corn & other crops
Bt corn can provide benefits in both starch & lignocellulosic feedstocks
Through reduced insect damage: Increase in yield
Increase in biomass
Reduction of mycotoxins more efficient conversion, healthier co-products for animal feed
Munkvold, Wu, Pometto, USDA Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grant (2008-2011)
Other transgenic possibilities: Stress-tolerant, drought-resistant crops to grow on marginal lands
Improved fuel conversion (e.g., more easily fermentable starch)
Photo: G Munkvold
37
New biofuels
Butanol
Produced via fermenting biomass
Good energy density, but too costly to produce pure butanol
Mixed alcohols
Mixture of microorganisms digest biomass to acids
Acids converted into corresponding alcohols (ethanol, butanol, etc.)
Needs pH control & massive biomass in silage-like piles
Biogas (methane)
Generated by anaerobic conversion of waste residues
Methane combusted in furnace heat or steam
Useful if liquefied natural gas more common as transport fuel
38
Syngas ethanol
New progress in thermochemical conversion processes through improved catalysis
Synthetic gas, “syngas,” can be converted to ethanol
Syngas (CO & H2) made by gasification of carbon-based materials
High temperature / pressure, oxygen-controlled atmosphere
DOE / Ames laboratory & ISU: develop nanotechnology-based catalyst to react with syngas to form ethanol
Avoids producing unwanted waste products
Advantages: can convert almost any carbon-based material to syngas (similar to feedstocks of cellulosic ethanol)
3939
Algae as biofuel source
“Algaculture”: farming algae for biofuels
Algae can be metabolically altered to generate high levels of oil ~6000 gal biofuel/A
Environmental benefits: Doesn‟t need freshwater, can use ocean or wastewater
DOE: If algal fuel replaced all petroleum fuel in US, would only require area equivalent to size of Maryland
Challenges: Containment, temp. control, high infrastructure costs
4040
“True renewables”: Wind and solar energy
Benefits
Wind & solar energy are
plentiful, renewable, widely
distributed, clean, & in theory
have zero GHG emissions
Current issues
Infrastructure costs
Siting & transmission lines
Windmills and Pickens‟ Plan
Could supply <20% US electricity
Could save US $300 billion annually in foreign oil
Could reduce GHG emissions (natural gas lower-polluting)
Issues: transmission lines expensive, natural gas still need for peak electricity demand
T. Boone Pickens (July „08)
Invest $1 trillion in wind turbine farms in Great Plains Wind Corridor
Turbines connect to power grid
Displaced natural gas can fuel vehicles
4242
More energy-efficient lifestyles
Our energy demands drove up price of oil…
Transport Fuel-efficient vehicles
Mass transit
Bicycling / walking
Buildings Use as much energy as transportation, release twice as much
greenhouse gas (Tilman 2007)
Natural lighting, compact fluorescents, turning off lights &
appliances, smaller homes (“Small House Society”)
4343
Summary
We can avoid a global energy crisis through renewable fuel sources
Ethanol has unique environmental health benefits & risks compared with gasoline
Technology & appropriate policies can make win-win situations for multiple sectors
Other renewable sources & lifestyle changes should be considered in conjunction with ethanol for energy-secure future
Final thoughts
Ethanol & climate change: well-
characterized
But ethanol & ozone-related mortality:
We need to pay more attention!
Many environmental solutions focus
on how to produce ethanol more
efficiently…
But how to reduce ozone pollution?
Focus technology $ and policy here
Get government agencies &
universities to “reach across the aisle”
44
4545
Acknowledgment
Donald Beermann: Sigma Xi President, University of Nebraska chapter
Gary Munkvold: Iowa State University
Paul Bertels, Geoff Cooper: National Corn Growers Association
Thomas Biksey, Judith Lave, George Leikauf, Yan Liu, Conrad Volz: University of Pittsburgh
Daniel Morris: General Dynamics