Upload
jason-cummings
View
216
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ENERGY STAR®
ENERGY STAR Refrigerators and FreezersRichard H. Karney, US DOE
July 18, 2001
Review of
Analysis Methodology
• Why expand?
•Industry/Utility/Consumer interest
•New Models Available
•Provide motivation to increase product efficiency
•Provide more efficient option for common household purchase
Expansion of Coverage and Eligibility
Current Refrigeration Spec
• Standard size refrigerators only
• >12.5 ft3 for top-mount freezer
• >18 ft3 for side-by-side, bottom
• Initial specification intended to include most common sizes
Proposed Addition to Specification Coverage
• Mid-sized refrigerators
• 6.5 to 18.5 ft3, all configurations
• Freezers (manual & auto)
• All residential sizes
• Compact refrigerators/freezers
• < 6.5 ft3
• Manual & partial defrost
• All sizes
Proposed ENERGY STAR Levels for Expansion
• 10% below NAECA standard• No change• Maintain consistency with current
specification• Consistency aids consumer
understanding
• Exception• Compact refrigerators/freezers• 20% below NAECA proposed
Mid-size Refrigerators: Market Overview
• Estimated annual sales: 1.9 million
• Top mount freezer most common
NAECA and ENERGY STAR: Mid-size
Top Mount Freezer Performance vs NAECA
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
5.50 10.50 15.50
Size (ft3)
kWh
/yr
Top Mount FreezerPerformance
NAECA Points
Energy Star Points
Current AveragePerformance
NAECA Standard
Proposed Energy StarLevel (10%)
Proposed ENERGY STAR Level:Mid-sized Refrigerators
• 10% below NAECA standard
• Consistent with current speciation
Compacts: Market Overview
• Annual Sales: 2.4 million
• Mostly Manual Defrost
• Sales Volume Doubled in Last Five Years
NAECA and ENERGY STAR: Compacts
Small Refrigerator Efficiency by Volume
250
270
290
310
330
350
370
390
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Adjusted Volume
kWh
/yea
r
kWh/year
Federal Minimum Standard
Proposed 10% ENERGY STAR level
Proposed 15% ENERGY STAR level
Proposed 20% ENERGY STAR level
Proposed ENERGY STAR Level: Compacts
• 20% below NAECA standard
• Why not 10%?• 20% created better
differentiation
• Greater energy savings
Freezers: Market Overview
• 2 million units/year sales
• 36 million unit stock• 1 in 3 households
• Two manufacturers have 99% of market
NAECA and ENERGY STAR: Upright Freezers
Upright Manual Defrost Freezer Performance
(AHAM-2001*)
200
300
400
500
600
700
3 8 13 18 23
Size-ft 3
kWh/yr
Upright-Manual
DOE standard
Proposed Energy Star Spec. Current Averaged Performance DOE Standard
Proposed Energy Star Level (10% reduction)
NAECA and ENERGY STAR: Chest Freezers
Chest-Manual Defrost Freezers Performance (AHAM-2001)
150
250
350
450
550
650
3 13 23
Size-ft3
kWh
/yr
Chest-Manual
DOE standard
Proposed Energy Star Spec.
Current Averaged Performance
DOE Standard
Proposed Energy Star Level(10% reduction)
Proposed ENERGY STARLevels: Freezers
• 10% below current NAECA standard
• Currently, freezers at 10% below NAECA do not exist
• Manufacturers stated they will produce more efficient product upon introduction of ENERGY STAR expansion
Estimated Energy Savings
• Assume 10% market penetration in first year• Freezers: 13.6 GWh
• Compacts: 8.2 GWh
• Mid-sized: 8.7 GWh
Estimated Energy Savings Formula
Model technique:• Weighted average size (ft3)
times average unit energy consumption improvement times annual shipments of Energy Star Units
• Give aggregate annual consumption
Options to Improve Performance
• Improve insulation• HCFC blown Ins. ends in 2004• New materials being considered
• Improve compressor performance
• ECMs for condenser/evaporator
• Onboard demand management
Conclusion
• These are proposed performance levels
• Please make comments today
• Reminder: Final comments due August 2