Upload
trinhtu
View
239
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Company Report Industry: Media Entertainment
Balwindar Singh ([email protected]) +91-22-66322239
Dish TV India Good times ahead - Phase-III/IV; improving B/S; FCFF generation
June 25, 2014 2
Dish TV India
Prabhudas Lilladher Pvt. Ltd. and/or its associates (the 'Firm') does and/or seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of the report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
Please refer to important disclosures and disclaimers at the end of the report
Contents Page No.
Investment Rationale .................................................................................................. 5
Leading DTH player with 27% market share ...................................................................................... 5
Digitization Opportunity - Phase III & IV to open up new growth avenues ....................................... 5
DTH has disappointed in Phase-I/II .............................................................................................. 5
However, Phase-III/IV are likely to see DTH bouncing back ........................................................ 6
Opportunity in Phase-III/IV ................................................................................................................ 7
ARPU increase on the cards ............................................................................................................... 7
Dichotomy between DTH and MSOs ................................................................................................. 9
What DITV is doing to address the dichotomy ................................................................................ 10
Change in strategy ........................................................................................................................... 12
Strategy #1-Focus on quality additions: ..................................................................................... 12
Strategy #2- Launch of Zing ....................................................................................................... 12
Strategy #3-Reduction of subsidy on STBs ................................................................................. 13
Strategy #4 - Lowering SAC ........................................................................................................ 14
Strategy #4 - Lowering investment/net subscriber ................................................................... 15
Strategy #5 - Improving payback period .................................................................................... 15
Strategy #6 - Reducing churn ..................................................................................................... 16
Change in strategy to result in improving per subscriber economics for DITV .......................... 16
Margin levers ................................................................................................................................... 17
Rationalizing content cost remains a key focus area ................................................................. 17
ARPU increases to support margin improvement ..................................................................... 18
Focus on improving Balance Sheet/Cash Flow ................................................................................ 18
SWOT Analysis .......................................................................................................... 20
Business Description ................................................................................................. 21
Risks .......................................................................................................................... 22
Financials .................................................................................................................. 23
Expect revenues to increase by 12% CAGR over FY14-16E ............................................................. 23
EBITDA likely to increase by 17.7% CAGR; RoCE to move to positive territory ............................... 24
FCFF generation set to improve; debt likely to reduce from Rs11.8bn in FY14 to Rs8.3bn by FY16E .......................................................................................................................................... 25
Valuations and Recommendation ............................................................................ 26
Dish TV India
Company Report June 25, 2014
Rating BUY
Price Rs57
Target Price Rs72
Implied Upside 26.3%
Sensex 25,369
Nifty 7,580
(Prices as on June 24, 2014)
Trading data
Market Cap. (Rs bn) 60.6
Shares o/s (m) 1,063.0
3M Avg. Daily value (Rs m) 1094.4
Major shareholders
Promoters 64.50%
Foreign 11.54%
Domestic Inst. 4.94%
Public & Other 19.02%
Stock Performance
(%) 1M 6M 12M
Absolute 2.8 (4.7) (6.1)
Relative 0.1 (25.3) (42.9)
How we differ from Consensus
EPS (Rs) PL Cons. % Diff.
2015 0.0 0.2 NA
2016 1.4 1.7 -15.0
Price Performance (RIC: DSTV.BO, BB: DITV IN)
Source: Bloomberg
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Jun
-13
Au
g-1
3
Oct
-13
De
c-1
3
Feb
-14
Ap
r-1
4
Jun
-14
(Rs)(Rs)
Phase-III/IV provides a significant opportunity to the DTH industry: Digital
Cable has emerged as the clear winner in Phase-I/II due to their last mile
connectivity. However, Phase-III/IV is likely to turn the tide in direct-to-home’s
(DTH)’s favour due to connectivity issues of MSOs in cable-dark areas, already
stretched balance sheet of MSOs, delay in implementation of gross billing etc.
Phase-III/IV collectively consists of 80m households compared to 35m
households in Phase-I/II. Assuming that DTH garners 55% of the market share, of
which Dish TV (DITV) is able to capture 25% incremental subscribers, DITV’s
potential gross additions can amount to 11.0m. Since digitization in Phase-III/IV
might get delayed beyond FY16E, we have assumed only partial benefits. We
have conservatively modelled for an increase in gross subscribers by 5.6m from
16.6m in FY14 to 22.1m by FY16E.
Focus on profitable growth: DITV’s renewed focus on profitable growth has
evolved from its past experience of aggressive subscriber additions which led to
higher capex outflow and negative FCFF generation. However, the industry has
now realized that this business model is unsustainable. Over the last couple of
years, there has been a concerted effort from the industry to hike STB prices as
well as ARPU. Consequently, Subscriber Acquisition Costs (SAC) have currently
declined from Rs2,273 in Q2FY13 to Rs1,800. Reduction in cash burn on new
subscriber acquisition would help to improve balance sheet and improve cash
flow position. Through reduction in SAC, DITV has also been able to reduce its
payback period. Further increase of 10% in package prices from June 1, 2014 is
also a step in that direction.
Contd...4
Key financials (Y/e March) 2013 2014 2015E 2016E
Revenues (Rs m) 21,668 25,090 27,449 31,483
Growth (%) 10.7 15.8 9.4 14.7
EBITDA (Rs m) 5,794 6,241 7,079 8,640
PAT (Rs m) (660) (411) (14) 1,507
EPS (Rs) (0.6) (0.4) — 1.4
Growth (%) NA NA NA NA
Net DPS (Rs) — — — —
Profitability & Valuation 2013 2014 2015E 2016E
EBITDA margin (%) 26.7 24.9 25.8 27.4
RoE (%) NA NA NA NA
RoCE (%) NA 2.0 7.0 26.6
EV / sales (x) 3.4 2.8 2.5 2.1
EV / EBITDA (x) 12.6 11.1 9.7 7.8
PE (x) NA NA NA 40.2
P / BV (x) NA NA NA NA
Net dividend yield (%) — — — —
Source: Company Data; PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 4
New initiatives likely to address dichotomy between DTH and MSOs: DTH
industry accounts for ~60% of broadcasters’ subscription revenues, with only a
35-40% subscriber base. Furthermore, cable industry receives ~Rs15bn-18bn
carriage fees annually from broadcasters, while for DTH, it is negligible.
To address this dichotomy, DITV has undertaken various steps. In Jan 2014, DITV
introduced “a-la-carte” scheme, whereby, it has removed channels of Indiacast
UTV out of its packages and put them on an ‘a-la-carte’ basis. Initial response
has been encouraging and as per management, only ~20% of DITV’s subscribers
have opted for Colors TV, while for most of the other Indiacast channels, they
have been subscribed by merely ~2-3% of the subscriber base. DITV argues that
it is now in a better position to negotiate with the broadcasters’ and its content
cost renegotiation with Indiacast UTV has resulted in ~25-35% decline in content
costs. DITV plans to follow the same model with other broadcasters.
Discontinuation of content aggregators (Mediapro, IndiaCast, OneAlliance etc.)
will also strengthen DITV’s bargaining power. Over the medium term, DITV
targets to reduce its content costs from 31% of sales in FY14 to ~26-27%. For
FY15E, DITV‘s expects content cost increase in low single digits.
Expect revenues to increase by 12% CAGR over FY14-16E; margins to improve
from 24.9% in FY14 to 27.4% by FY16E, driven by content cost reduction and
increase in ARPU: We expect DITV’s revenues to increase by 12.0% CAGR over
FY14-16E driven by pick-up in subscriber additions. We expect net subscribers to
increase from 11.4m in FY14 to 14.7m by FY16E, increasing at a CAGR of 13.6%.
Subscriber growth will be primarily driven by digitization in Phase-III & IV as DTH
is expected to be the primary beneficiary of digitization in these areas. Current
blended ARPU stands at Rs163. We have modeled for ARPU of Rs172/174 in
FY15E/16E, respectively. We expect DITV’s EBITDA to increase at a CAGR of
17.7% during FY14-16E. With improvement in EBITDA and reduction in interest
costs, adjusted PAT is likely to move into a positive territory. PAT is likely to
improve from loss of Rs411m in FY14 to profit of Rs1.5bn by FY16E, translating
into annual EPS of Rs1.4. RoCE is likely to improve from 2.0% in FY14 to 26.6% by
FY16E.
Focus on improving Balance Sheet/Cash Flow: All of DITV’s strategy to reduce
subsidy, improve payback period and focus on quality additions are designed
with an eye to improve FCFF generation and thereby, reduce debt. DITV became
FCFF positive in FY13, while in FY14, it generated FCFF of Rs3.1bn. Over the next
two years, we expect DITV to generate cumulative FCFF of Rs5bn despite
significant capex lined up. Debt reduction remains a top priority and with
improvement in internal cash flows, we expect DITV to repay Rs2bn/1.5bn debt
in FY15E/16E, respectively.
Recommend “BUY” with target price of Rs72: We expect DITV to be a key
beneficiary of the ongoing digitization process in Phase-III/IV. With DITV’s
leadership position, pick-up in subscriber additions, focus on improving margins,
reduction in subsidy, improvement in FCFF generation and reduction in debt,
DITV is bound to get re-rated. We value DITV at 10x FY16E EV/EBITDA (close to
its 2yr-range), resulting in target price of Rs72 (upside potential of 26%).
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 5
Investment Rationale
Leading DTH player with 27% market share
DITV, the leading DTH service provider in Asia Pacific, is the only pure-play listed
Indian DTH player commanding industry leading market share of 27%. Though DITV’s
market share has declined from its peak of 70% in 2007 due to entrance of new
players, DITV still ranks first by a wide margin when compared to its nearest
competitor, Tata Sky. DITV’s market share has now stabilized around 25-30% and we
see no threat to its leadership position.
Exhibit 1: Market share of DTH players based on gross subscribers as on March 31, 2014
Dish TV27%
Tata Sky20%
SunDirect
13%
BigTV7%
Airtel Digital
19%
Videocon D2H14%
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Digitization Opportunity - Phase III & IV to open up new growth avenues
DTH has disappointed in Phase-I/II
Digital cable has emerged as the clear winner in Phase-I/II aided by their last-mile
connectivity with end subscribers, strong personal connect, incumbency, high initial
acquisition cost of DTH and lower ARPU in digital cable due to continued delay in
gross billing. Our channel checks suggests that DTH has only been able to garner 15-
20% of subscriber churn from analog to digital environment. MSOs have
demonstrated their strong foothold in these markets, while lack of personal connect
with subscribers have hurt DTH in Phase-I/II.
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 6
However, Phase-III/IV are likely to see DTH bouncing back
Phase-III/IV is likely to turn the tide in DTH’s favor due to connectivity issues of MSOs
in cable-dark areas. Over the last few years, DTH has built a strong platform for itself
in Tier III/IV cities led by absence of digital cable and limited presence of analog
cable infrastructure in rural towns. MSOs have been focused on Tier-I/II cities due to
their traditional strong footing in metros providing DTH an opportunity to tap rural
towns. We believe DTH will be the primary beneficiary in Phase-III/IV due to:
Focus of large MSOs in Tier I/II cities
Exhibit 2: MSOs - subscriber profile (m)
MSOs Total subscribers Digital subscribers Phase- I seeding Phase- II seeding
Hathway 11.5 7.7 2.5 4.2
DEN 13.0 5.7 2.0 3.0
Siticable >10.0 4.0 1.0 2.5
Digicable >8.5 NA 0.5 1.0
IMCL NA NA 1.0 2.3
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Already stretched Balance Sheet of MSOs
Exhibit 3: Stretched Balance Sheet of MSOs
MSOs Gross debt Cash Net debt Equity Net D/E EBITDA Interest EBITDA/Interest FCF FY13
Hathway 11,072 440 10,632 9,593 1.1 3,014 1,345 2.2 (4,626)
DEN 5,173 8,630 (3,457) 18,585 (0.2) 3,022 890 3.4 (3,748)
Siticable 10,958 3,529 7,429 1,133 6.6 1,128 1,191 0.9 (5,404)
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Further capex required in Phase- III/IV for MSOs
Exhibit 4: MSOs require further huge capex to fund Phase-III/IV
No. of boxes to be seeded in Phase-III - (m) 30
No. of boxes to be seeded in Phase-IV - (m) 50
Total boxes reqd.-m 80
Cost/Set top box 1,800
Gross Capex reqd.- Rs bn 144
Activation Revenues collected/box 500
Activation revenues - Rs bn 40
Net Capex required - Rs bn 104
Upfront payment reqd. 40%
Upfront payment for set top boxes - Rs bn 42
Deferred payment 60%
Deferred payout - Rs bn 62
Interest rate on deferred payout 10%
Annual Interest - Rs bn 6
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 7
Better technological competence of DTH players
Owing to the above mentioned rationale, we expect DTH to emerge as the primary
beneficiary of digitization in Phase-III/IV. We expect DTH to garner 50-60% of the
churn from analog to digitized platform. DITV expects 50% of Phase-III and IV
subscribers to shift to the DTH platform.
Opportunity in Phase-III/IV
Phase-III/IV collectively consists of 80m households compared to 35m households in
Phase-I/II combined. The opportunity that lies ahead for DTH players is huge, given
that DTH already has a strong brand recall in rural towns and connectivity/reach is
not an issue for DTH platform. Though the deadline for Phase-III/IV is Dec 2014, we
expect the process to get completed only by FY17E.
Exhibit 5: Opportunity for Dish TV in Phase-III/IV
Particulars m
No. of households in Phase-III – (m) 30
No. of households in Phase-IV – (m) 50
Total households – (m) 80
Expected share of DTH platform 55%
Potential DTH subscribers – (m) 44
Market share assumption for DISH – (m) 25%
Potential subscribers for DITV- (m) 11.0
Source: Industry, PL Research
ARPU increase on the cards
Despite implementation of digitization in Phase-I/II cities, ARPUs have not increased
materially for DITV due to delay in gross billing. However, we believe it is only a
matter of time before ARPU sees a sustained uptick. We believe there are multiple
levers for ARPU going forward -
Increase in package prices have not translated into corresponding ARPU
increase: DITV has hiked package prices 3-4 times since Apr 2012. However, all
of the price increase has not percolated into ARPU increase due to significant
downtrading within packages. While base pack price stands at Rs220 currently
compared to Rs175 in Apr 2012, ARPU has increased only from Rs152 in Apr
2012 to Rs163 currently. Muted growth in ARPU can be attributed to
downtrading within packages (in Q4FY12, 48% of subscriber base was on base
pack, while currently 58% of subscribers are on base pack). In light of this, DITV
has changed its strategy from fuelling subscriber growth to focus on quality
subscribers. Improvement in subscriber mix will enable DITV to bring about an
improvement in ARPU and reduce churn.
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 8
Further hike in package prices by 10% from June 1, 2014: DITV has hiked
package prices by further 10% (excl. base pack) from June 1, 2014.
Exhibit 6: Package price trend
Packages Q2FY11 Q4FY11 Q1FY12 Q3FY12 Q4FY12 Q1FY13 Q2FY13 Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14 Q4FY14 June'1st '14
Super Family Pack 150 160 165 175 175 180 200 220 220 220 220 220
Super Gold 225 225 225 225 225 235 255 280 280 280 280 300
Super World Pack 270 270 275 275 275 285 305 320 320 320 320 340
Platinum packs 325 325 350 350 350 360 380 400 400 400 400 421
Paradise Packs NA NA NA NA NA 400 400 440 449 449 449 494
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Exhibit 7: ARPU trend (Rs/month/subscriber)
Q2FY11 Q3FY11 Q4FY11 Q1FY12 Q2FY12 Q3FY12 Q4FY12 Q1FY13 Q2FY13 Q3FY13 Q4FY13 Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14 Q4FY14
ARPU 139 142 150 150 152 152 152 156 159 160 157 165 165 166 163
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Implementation of gross billing will give headroom to DTH to raise prices:
Traditionally, cable has remained a preferred choice for consumers due to its
last-mile connectivity and lower monthly outflow (while the lumpsum amount
that a LCO used to charge consumer was significantly lower than DTH, LCO also
used to provide 2nd/3rd cable connection in the same house at free of cost),
while DTH has been perceived as a premium service by the consumers.
However, with the implementation of gross billing, we expect digital cable to
raise ARPUs significantly (to cover their capex and tax) which would enable DTH
to further raise prices.
MSOs require further money to fund their capex. Additionally, to meet tax
obligations and increase content cost payouts to broadcasters, MSOs will be
forced to increase package prices.
Ramp-up in HD services will further increase blended ARPU. Of the net
incremental additions during the last few quarters, HD subscribers account for
~10-12% of the new subscribers. Since HD ARPU at Rs441 currently is ~2x as
compared to SD, increase in HD subscribers can increase blended ARPU. DITV’s
offering of 46HD channels is the highest among all DTH players.
Exhibit 8: HD additions & ARPU
Q1FY12 Q2FY12 Q3FY12 Q4FY12 Q1 FY13 Q2FY13 Q3FY13 Q4FY13 Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14 Q4FY14
HD additions as a % of total additions 5.5% 6.0% 5.0% 5.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 14.0% 11.5% 11.0% 11.5%
HD ARPU- Rs/month NA >400 >400 NA 414 NA NA 414 414 454 441 441
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 9
DTH ARPU in India is one of the lowest: DTH ARPU in India at US$4/month is
one of the lowest when compared globally or even with the emerging markets.
Hence, there exists a tremendous potential for increase in ARPU, going forward.
Exhibit 9: Pay-TV-ARPU across Asian countries
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dichotomy between DTH and MSOs
Despite a substantially lower subscriber base of DTH compared to analog/digital
cable, DTH industry ends up paying ~Rs24bn as content costs to broadcasters which
is similar to that of cable. DTH industry accounts for ~60% of broadcasters’
subscription revenues with only a 35-40% subscriber count. Compare this to the
carriage fees which are paid by broadcasters to Cable v/s DTH. Cable industry
receives ~Rs15-18bn carriage fees annually from broadcasters, while for DTH, this
amount is negligible.
Exhibit 10: DTH pays disproportionately higher content costs to broadcasters'
FY11 FY12 FY13
Hathway
Content cost – (m) 3,622 4,295 4,325
No. of subscribers – (m) 8.7 8.8 10.5
Content cost/subscriber/month - Rs 35 41 34
DEN networks
Content cost – (m) NA NA 2,988
No. of subscribers – (m) NA NA 11
Content cost/subscriber/month- Rs NA NA 23
Siticable
Content cost – (m) 2,003 2,163 2,343
No. of subscribers – (m) NA NA 10
Content cost/subscriber/month - Rs NA NA 20
Dish TV
Content cost – (m) 5,168 6,087 6,525
No. of subscribers – (m) 8.5 9.6 10.6
Content cost/subscriber/month - Rs 51 53 51
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 10
Our analysis suggests that DTH industry continues to suffer due to unfavourable
treatment meted out to them compared to cable. For DITV, net content
cost/subscriber (content cost less carriage revenues) works out to
~Rs55/subscriber/month compared to significantly lower amount for MSOs.
What DITV is doing to address the dichotomy
Unique initiatives showcase DITV’s strategic vision and understanding of business;
miles ahead of competitors.
A-la-carte scheme to reduce DITV’s content costs/increase carriage revenue
In Nov 2013, DITV launched “On Request Channels” scheme which gives consumers
the choice of removing the channels which they do not want from their subscription
packages. Under this scheme, there is a separate categorization within the
subscribed package of the consumer named as “Request only basis”. It is available
to the consumer only if he requests for those channels included under this scheme.
If the consumer is not interested in watching the channel and does not request for
these channels within a stipulated period of time, he will be credited with 100 bonus
points (valued Rs100) for each unsubscribed channel which can be used by him to
purchase movies-on-demand/a-la-carte channels etc. This scheme was introduced
on Nov 15, 2013 for 22 channels of Indiacast UTV.
However, things turned ugly between DITV and Indiacast UTV after the launch of this
scheme. In Dec 2013, the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal
(TDSAT) gave its official order in the petition filed by IndiaCast UTV against DITV.
DITV has been asked to provide all the channels of the IndiaCast bouquet on a-la-
carte basis. DITV has taken all the 22 channels of Indiacast UTV (with regard to which
the fixed deal agreement came to an end on Dec 31, 2013) out of its packages and
put them on a-la-carte basis on its platform. For the remaining 16 channels of
Indiacast UTV whose agreement expired on Mar 31, 2014, Dish TV has also put them
on a-la-carte basis.
Through this scheme, DITV expects to benefit by way of –
Reduction in content costs: Over the medium term, DITV targets to reduce its
content costs from 31% of sales in FY14 to ~26-27%. Implementation of a-la-
carte scheme is a step in that direction. Through this renegotiation with
Indiacast UTV, DITV aims to save on content cost payouts as its outflow is
expected to reduce significantly under the new arrangement. As per
management, its content cost renegotiation with Indiacast UTV has resulted in
~25-35% decline in content costs related to that contract. DITV plans to
implement the same model with other broadcasters’ also. Discontinuation of
content aggregators (Mediapro, IndiaCast, OneAlliance etc.) will also strengthen
DITV’s bargaining power. For FY15E, DITV expects content cost increase to be in
low single digits, while as a % of revenues, content cost is likely to decline by
150-200bps.
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 11
Exhibit 11: Content costs set to reduce
27.0%
28.0%
29.0%
30.0%
31.0%
32.0%
33.0%
34.0%
35.0%
36.0%
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
Content costs (Rs m) Content costs as a % of sales (RHS)
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Increase in carriage fees: Through the implementation of this scheme, DITV will
succeed in earning additional carriage revenues from those channels which do
not have a pull factor attached to them. DITV’s aggressive strategy to remove
Indiacast channels from its packages clearly shows that DITV is not willing to
budge in its fight with broadcasters. Smaller broadcasters will have to shell out
higher amount to DITV in case they want their channels to feature/be carried
within packages.
As per management, after the a-la-carte scheme for Indiacast UTV channels has
been implemented, only ~20% of Dish TV’s subscribers have opted for Colors
channel (compared to ~50-60% earlier). Further, most of the other Indiacast
channels have been subscribed by merely ~2-3% of Dish TV’s subscriber base.
DITV plans to share monthly reach data of channels
Starting Feb 2014, DITV is sharing monthly reach data of individual channels
broadcast on its platform with media agencies/advertisers. This is a unique initiative
which will share individual channels reach data as a percentage of Dish TV’s total
platform reach. Sharing of such data will help agencies/advertisers in taking
informed pricing decisions. We believe this initiative clearly outlines DITV’s
aggressive strategy of controlling content costs/increasing carriage revenues. Smaller
channels will be forced to either shell out higher carriage fees or receive lower
content costs. Currently, there is no other distribution platform which shares reach
data and industry has to depend on TAM for viewership data.
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 12
Change in strategy
Strategy #1-Focus on quality additions:
Of late, investors have been pretty concerned about slowing additions in DITV’s
subscriber base. However, we believe that lower additions are a part of a strategy
shift wherein the focus is on profitable growth (rather than just chasing growth).
Aggressive acquisition of subscribers in the last few years was brought about by
offering lower entry costs, higher subsidy on set top boxes, lower package prices etc.
which resulted in continued losses. However, over the last few quarters, the strategy
has shifted from mere growth to profitable growth, i.e management has clearly
stressed on the need for acquiring higher ARPU subscribers. Management
acknowledges the importance of reducing subsidy on set-top boxes and moderating
churn rates which would help it to achieve profitable growth. While high STB prices
may ensure more sticky consumers, it may result in moderation in subscriber
additions and loss of subscriber market share in the interim.
Exhibit 12: Gross subscriber additions - m
0.4
0.5
0.8
0.3 0.4 0.4
0.5 0.4
0.6
0.8
1.1
1.0
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.4 0.5 0.5
0.8
0.4 0.3 0.4
0.5
0.3
-
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Q1
FY0
9
Q2
FY0
9
Q3
FY
09
Q4
FY0
9
Q1
FY1
0
Q2
FY1
0
Q3
FY
10
Q4
FY1
0
Q1
FY1
1
Q2
FY
11
Q3
FY1
1
Q4
FY1
1
Q1
FY1
2
Q2
FY
12
Q3
FY1
2
Q4
FY1
2
Q1
FY
13
Q2
FY1
3
Q3
FY1
3
Q4
FY1
3
Q1
FY
14
Q2
FY1
4
Q3
FY1
4
Q4
FY1
4
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Strategy #2- Launch of Zing
DITV recently launched Zing, a sub-brand designed specifically for linguistic
audiences and primarily for Phase-III/IV markets where regional language
consumption is a priority. Initially, it was launched in Orissa and West Bengal and has
now been extended to Bengali speaking markets in Northeast. Zing’s acceptance has
been pretty encouraging. In Orissa, Zing is the no. 1 brand in terms of incremental
gross additions on a MoM basis, while in West Bengal it is the no.2 brand.
Management also highlighted that cannibalization of the DISH primary brand has
been minimal as customers who have moved to Zing have primarily shifted from
analog/DD platform. Zing’s base pack is priced at Rs175 (DISH base pack is at Rs220).
However, gross margins in Zing are higher than DISH due to lower content costs as
Zing is primarily focused on regional content.
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 13
Launch of Zing has also spurred subscriber additions which had slowed down
over the last couple of quarters. On a monthly rate, DITV is now clocking 0.2m
subscribers compared to 0.13m last year. Hence, overall subscriber additions for
FY15E are likely to be significantly higher than FY14 (FY14 gross subscriber adds
were 1.45m). Overall, DITV’s market share of incremental additions increased to
24% in Q4FY14 compared to 20% in Q3. As per DITV, Zing currently has 1lakh
subscribers and is expected to add 2lakh gross subscribers in FY15. Zing is
expected to contribute <10% of incremental gross additions.
Zing is being offered at an entry price of Rs1,299/box as a promotional offer.
While initial subscriber acquisition costs for DITV may be high, we expect it to
settle down gradually.
Exhibit 13: Regional focussed packages of Zing
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Strategy #3-Reduction of subsidy on STBs
Reduction in subsidy has been identified as a key strategy for DITV to move towards
profitable growth. Under the current scenario, DITV ends up subsidizing Rs1,200/set
top box. Though subsidy has been reduced over the last year through gradual
increase in entry prices, DITV maintains that they would like to move to zero-subsidy
model over the long-term. Appreciation in Rupee with the emergence of a new,
stable govt. at the Centre would also help in reducing subsidy as DITV imports set-
top boxes from Korea.
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 14
Exhibit 14: DISH TV- hike in offer price of SD box
1,640 1,840
1,999
2,249
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Before Feb'13 Wef Feb'13- First
hike
Wef Feb'13-
Second hike
Wef July'13(R
s)
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Strategy #4 - Lowering SAC
SAC for the DTH industry has remained high over the years due to focus on new
seeding and gaining incremental market share. This has resulted in high capex
outflow and negative FCFF generation due to high level of subsidy. However, the
industry has realized that this business model is unsustainable due to high capex
requirements, low ARPU levels and resultant long payback period.
In FY14, there has been a concerted effort from the industry to hike STB prices as
well as ARPU. Steep hike in entry prices of STB along with discontinuation of free
viewing period has resulted into lowering of SAC for DITV as well as industry.
Reduction in cash burn on new subscriber acquisition would help to improve balance
sheet and improve cash flow position gradually.
Exhibit 15: DITV’s SAC on a downtrend
2,488
2,153 2,125 1,996
1,800
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
Source: Company Data, PL Research Note: SAC = Subsidy on STB + 80% of mktng. expenses + trade comm
Exhibit 16: Reducing SAC remains a top priority for DISH
2,145 2,273 2,201
1,996 1,828 1,849 1,889 1,800
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 15
Strategy #4 - Lowering investment/net subscriber
Through reduction in SAC, investment/net subscriber has also reduced for DITV over
the last few years.
Exhibit 17: Dish TV's investment/subscriber - Rs
4,055
3,390 3,218
2,939 2,837
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
(Rs)
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Strategy #5 - Improving payback period
Globally, the DTH industry is characterized by high initial cash outflows related to
customer acquisition, while the revenues are back-ended. Initially, subscriber
addition involves payout from the DTH provider in terms of subsidy on STBs,
marketing expenses for acquiring new customers and commission payout to dealers.
This results in high SAC initially, while revenues kick in over the lifetime of the
customer. Hence, DTH industry typically has a prolonged payback period.
Over the last couple of years, through reduction in SAC, DITV has been able to
reduce its payback period. Payback period stood at >5 years in FY10 which has
declined to <3 years in FY14.
Exhibit 18: SAC/ARPU - in months - proxy for payback period
18 18
15
14
13
11 10
9
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 16
Strategy #6 - Reducing churn
DITV’s current payback period at 2.5-3.0 years implies that if any consumer leaves
DITV’s platform before this time period, then that consumer leads to a loss for DITV.
Hence, it is necessary that the churn is reduced and kept at a manageable level.
Exhibit 19: Annualized churn rate
14.1% 13.9%
20.2%
12.0%12.7%
11.3% 11.2% 11.8%
6.0%6.9%
8.1%7.2%
4.0%
6.5%
9.0%
11.5%
14.0%
16.5%
19.0%
21.5%
Q1
FY1
2
Q2
FY
12
Q3
FY1
2
Q4
FY
12
Q1
FY1
3
Q2
FY1
3
Q3
FY1
3
Q4
FY1
3
Q1
FY
14
Q2
FY1
4
Q3
FY1
4
Q4
FY1
4
Source: Company Data, PL Research
DITV has taken the following measures to reduce churn:
Provide an impeccable viewing experience, both in terms of number of channels
as well as quality of technology
Increase prices of STBs in order to attract quality and not price-conscious
subscribers
Change in strategy to result in improving per subscriber economics for DITV
DITV’s renewed focus on profitable growth has evolved from its past experience of
aggressive subscriber additions which led to higher capex outflow and resultant
pressure on FCFF generation. We believe the proposed change in strategy is a step in
the right direction as it will help to improve per subscriber economics for DITV over
the medium term. Better economics will also partially annul moderation in
subscriber additions.
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 17
Margin levers
Rationalizing content cost remains a key focus area
Content cost is the single largest cost item for DITV and accounted for 31% of sales in
FY14. As highlighted earlier, DTH industry ends up paying ~Rs24bn as content costs
to broadcasters’ which is similar to that of cable. Despite accounting for only 35-40%
of subscriber market share, DTH industry contributes ~60% of broadcasters’
subscription revenues.
Reduction in content cost remains a primary focus area for DITV. Over the medium
term, DITV targets to reduce its content cost from 31% of sales in FY14 to ~26-27%.
Implementation of the a-la-carte scheme and sharing of monthly reach data is a
precursor to the fact that content cost renegotiations now would be based on actual
viewership. As per DITV, renegotiation with Indiacast UTV has resulted in ~25-35%
decline in content costs related to that contract. DITV plans to implement the same
model with other broadcasters’ also. Discontinuation of content aggregators
(Mediapro, IndiaCast, OneAlliance etc.) will also strengthen DITV’s bargaining power.
Further, implementation of digitization would also gradually correct the dichotomy
between DTH and MSO content payouts to broadcasters.
For FY15E, DITV expects content cost increase to be in low single digits, while as a
percentage of revenues, content cost is likely to decline by 150-200bps (we have
modelled for content costs to increase by 8%/12% in FY15E/16E, respectively).
Exhibit 20: Direct correlation between content costs and EBITDA margins
13.0%
17.0%
21.0%
25.0%
29.0%
33.0%
37.0%
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
Content cost as a % of sales EBITDA margin %
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 18
ARPU increases to support margin improvement
Under the digitization regime, ARPU increase is inevitable driven by -
Focus on quality subscribers than price-conscious subscribers
Implementation of gross billing would push cable ARPU higher giving room to
DTH to raise prices
MSOs will be forced to raise prices to counter increase in content cost payouts
and meet additional funding requirements
Ramp-up in HD services
Focus on improving Balance Sheet/Cash Flow
All of DITV’s strategy to improve payback period, reduce subsidy, focusing on quality
additions are designed with an eye to improve FCFF generation and thereby, reduce
debt. DITV became FCFF positive in FY13, while in FY14, it generated FCFF of
Rs3.1bn. In FY14, company has aggressively reduced debt by Rs5.8bn in constant
currency terms (Rs8.7bn after FX inclusion) through internal cash generation. At end
of Mar’14, gross debt stood at Rs11.8bn compared to Rs16.3bn in Mar’13. Net debt
stood at Rs8.5bn in Mar 2014 compared to Rs12.0bn in Mar 2013. In FY15E, DITV
expects to repay around Rs5.5bn of debt. DITV expects net debt at end of FY16E to
be ~Rs7bn. We expect DITV to generate Rs5bn of cumulative FCFF during FY14-16E,
which would imply self-sufficiency in funding its subscriber additions in Phase-III/IV.
Over FY14-16E, we expect gross debt to reduce by Rs3.5bn to Rs.8.3bn.
Exhibit 21: FCFF generation over the years
(2,339)(2,789)
293
4,232
2,559 2,507
(4,000)
(2,000)
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
FCFF generation
Source: Company Data, PL Research Note: As per DITV, in FY13/14 it generated FCFF of Rs650m and Rs3.1bn respectively
Exhibit 22: Debt reduction remains a top priority
10,763
14,003
16,330
11,849 9,849
8,349
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
Gross debt
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 19
Superior technology implies impeccable viewing experience
DITV boasts of collective transponder capacity of 648MHz which is the highest
among all other DTH players. DITV has still not completely shifted to the MPEG-4
technology and expects the transition to be a gradual one based on replacement
demand from existing customers. As per management, all the new boxes that they
are seeding is based on MPEG-4 technology. While Tata Sky has made a concerted
effort to shift to MPEG-4 at one go, DISH opted for a gradual phase-out of MPEG-2
technology. All the other four DTH players (Airtel, Sun Direct, Reliance Digital and
Videocon D2H) use MPEG-4 technology as they have been a late entrant in this
business. Nonetheless, DISH offers the highest number of channels both in SD as well
as HD.
Exhibit 23: Number of channels
Dish TV Tata Sky Airtel Sun Direct Reliance Digital Videocon
SD 353 290 317 212 248 343
HD 46 24 19 10 10 27
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 20
SWOT Analysis
Exhibit 24: SWOT Analysis
Strengths Opportunities Weaknesses Threats
Economies of Scale - DITV is the largest DTH player in India, with
~27% market share
Phase-III/IV - DTH is expected to be the primary beneficiary
Subscriber mix - ~60% of subscribers are rural. Low
concentration of subscribers in TAM-rich areas reduces bargaining
power
ARPU increase can augment churn - Consumers can shift to digital cable which might be cheaper
HD- is currently <10% of overall subscriber base
ARPU-ARPU growth till now has been lower than expectations
Rising competition- MSOs have demonstrated its dominance in
Phase-I/II
Higher channel offerings - By far, DITV offers the highest number of
channels, both in SD and HD
ARPU - With implementation of gross billing, DTH will be in a
position to raise prices
Deep understanding of industry dynamics - Initiated several new
initiatives like ‘On Request’ channels, sharing monthly reach
data etc.
Strong promoter background - Promoted by the Essel group
Source: PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 21
Business Description
DITV, promoted by the Essel group, is the pioneer in India’s DTH space. DITV is Asia-
Pacific’s largest DTH provider and the only pure-play listed Indian DTH player. The
company is the leader in DTH service offering with 400+ channels and services and is
the only DTH provider in India to be serviced by two satellites. Dish has a pan-India
distribution network with ~ 167,000 dealers across 8,700+ towns who are serviced
through 300+ sales personnel and 14 Regional offices. As of Mar 2014, DITV’s market
share stood at 27%. Gross subscribers stood at 16.6m in Q4FY14.
Management Team
Mr. Subhash Chandra, Non-Executive Chairman - Mr. Subhash Chandra, Non-
Executive Chairman of the Board and promoter of Essel Group of Companies, is
amongst the leading lights of the global media & entertainment industry. Mr.
Chandra revolutionized the television industry by launching the country's first
satellite television channel, Zee TV in 1992 and later the first private news channel,
Zee News. For his contributions to the industry, Mr. Chandra has been awarded the
2011 International Emmy Directorate Award. Mr. Chandra became the first Indian
ever to receive a Directorate Award recognizing excellence in television
programming outside the United States.
Jawahar Lal Goel, Managing Director - Mr. Goel has been instrumental in
establishing DITV as a prominent brand with India’s most modern and advanced
technological infrastructure. Mr. Goel led the initiatives of the Indian Broadcasting
Foundation (IBF) as its president for four consecutive years from September 2006 to
September 2010 and continues to be its active Board member. He is also on the
Board of various committees and task forces set up by Ministry of Information &
Broadcasting (MIB). He is the prime architect in establishing India’s most modern
and advanced technological infrastructure for the implementation of Conditional
Access System (CAS) and Direct-to-Home (DTH) services through Head-end in the Sky
(HITS) which is poised to bring about a revolution in the distribution of various
entertainment and electronic media products in India and would enormously benefit
TV viewers.
R. C. Venkateish, Chief Executive Officer - Mr. Venkateish joined DITV in July, 2010.
He brings with him a wealth of more than 27 years’ experience, of which, 12 years
have been in senior international positions with global brands like Smithkline
Beecham, Nestle India, Gillette, Kellogg India.
Prior to this, Venkateish was the Managing Director India and South Asia, ESPN Star
Sports. His key achievements include developing new businesses into sizeable
operations and setting up Sales & Distribution channels. He was a key player in
consolidating ESPN Star Sports position as the clear market leader in sports
broadcasting and launch of Star Cricket.
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 22
Risks
Slowing subscriber additions: Increase in STB prices, reduction in subsidy and
increase in ARPU can slow down the subscriber additions. Moderation in
subscriber addition and loss of market share remains a key risk, going forward. If
company is not able to add new subscribers aggressively in Phase-III/IV, it will
put our earnings estimation at risk.
Change in govt. regulations: Any unfavourable change in govt. policies related
to license fee on DTH, import duty on STBs etc. can negatively impact financial
performance of DITV.
Aggressive competition: Intensifying competition resulting from host of
companies to capture market share in Phase-III/IV remains a risk to profitable
growth. DITV might also be forced to reduce prices to match up with
competitors. Such reduction would impact FCFF generation.
Continued delay in digitization: Though we have assumed a delay of 12-18
months in Phase-III/IV digitization, any further delay might put at risk our
subscriber addition estimates in that fiscal.
Rupee depreciation: Since DITV imports STBs, any Rupee depreciation would
increase the cost of STBs which might imply increase in subsidy if the company is
not able to pass on the price increase. Transponder costs are also denominated
in Dollars and would increase due to Rupee depreciation.
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 23
Financials
Expect revenues to increase by 12% CAGR over FY14-16E
We expect DITV’s revenues to increase by 12.0% CAGR over FY14-16E driven by pick-
up in subscriber additions. We expect net subscribers to increase from 11.4m in FY14
to 14.7m by FY16E, increasing at a CAGR of 13.6%. Subscriber growth will be
primarily driven by digitization in Phase-III & IV as DTH is expected to be the primary
beneficiary of digitization in these areas. Phase-III/IV includes 80m potential
households subscribers. We expect DTH to garner 55% market share in Phase-III/IV
accounting for 44m of subscribers. Assuming DITV captures 25% market share of
new gross additions, DITV’s potential gross additions can amount to 11.0m.
Since digitization in Phase-III/IV might get delayed beyond FY16E, we have assumed
only partial benefits. We have conservatively modelled for increase in gross
subscribers by 5.5m from 16.6m in FY14 to 22.1m by FY16E. Current blended ARPU
stands at Rs163. We have modeled for ARPU of Rs172/174 in FY15E/16E,
respectively. Though ARPUs in Phase-I/II are likely to increase post the
implementation of gross billing, blended ARPU growth is likely to be lower as new
subscriber additions in Phase-III/IV is likely to have a lower ticket size.
Exhibit 26: Revenues and Revenue growth
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
(Rs
m)
Revenues YoY gr. (RHS)
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Exhibit 27: ARPU and ARPU growth
139 153 158 164 172 174
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
-
50
100
150
200
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
(Rs)
ARPU YoY gr. (RHS)
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 24
Exhibit 28: Gross subscribers
10.4 12.9
15.1 16.6
19.0
22.1
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
-
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
(m)
Gross subscribers at year end YoY gr. (RHS)
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Exhibit 29: Net subscribers
8.5 9.6 10.6 11.4
12.9 14.7
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
-
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
(m)
Net subscribers at year end YoY gr. (RHS)
Source: Company Data, PL Research
EBITDA likely to increase by 17.7% CAGR; RoCE to move to positive territory
We expect DITV’s EBITDA to increase at a CAGR of 17.7% during FY14-16E. EBITDA
margins, which dipped to 24.9% in FY14, are likely to recover back to 27.4% by FY16E
driven by reduction in content costs and moderate increase in blended ARPU. As per
management, content cost renegotiation with Indiacast UTV has resulted in ~25-35%
decline in content costs related to that contract. DITV plans to implement the same
model with other broadcasters’ also. For FY15E, DITV expects content cost increase
to be in low single digits (we have modelled for content costs to increase by 8%/12%
in FY15E/16E, respectively). Interest cost is likely to decrease to Rs1.0bn/864m in
FY15E/16E, respectively from Rs1.3bn in FY14. With improvement in EBITDA and
reduction in interest costs, adjusted PAT is likely to move into a positive territory.
PAT is likely to improve from loss of Rs411m in FY14 to profit of Rs1.5bn by FY16E
translating into annual EPS of Rs1.4. RoCE is likely to improve from 2.0% in FY14 to
26.6% by FY16E.
Exhibit 30: EBITDA
2,380
4,960 5,794 6,241
7,079
8,640
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
(Rs
m)
EBITDA Margin (RHS)
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Exhibit 31: PAT
-1,920 -1,331
-660 -411
-14
1,507
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
-
1,000
2,000
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
(Rs
m)
PAT Margin (RHS)
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 25
Exhibit 32: RoCE to improve
-6.1%
-0.9% -2.0%
2.0%
7.0%
26.6%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
Source: Company Data, PL Research
FCFF generation set to improve; debt likely to reduce from Rs11.8bn in FY14 to Rs8.3bn by FY16E
With improvement in profitability and reduction in subsidy, we expect FCFF to
improve over the next few years. We expect DITV to generate FCFF of Rs2.6bn/2.5bn
in FY15E/FY16E, respectively, resulting into cumulative FCFF of Rs5bn. Debt
reduction remains a top priority and with improvement in internal cash flows, we
expect DITV to repay Rs2bn/1.5bn in FY15E/16E, respectively, despite significant
capex lined up.
Exhibit 33: FCFF generation
(2,339)(2,789)
293
4,232
2,559 2,507
(4,000)
(2,000)
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
FCFF generation
Source: Company Data, PL Research Note: As per DITV, in FY13/14 it generated FCFF of Rs650m and Rs3.1bn respectively
Exhibit 34: Gross Debt
10,763
14,003
16,330
11,849 9,849
8,349
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E
Gross debt
Source: Company Data, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 26
Valuations and Recommendation
We expect DITV to be a key beneficiary of the ongoing digitization process in Phase-
III/IV. Company’s leadership position, coupled with new initiatives (launch of Zing,
implementation of a-la-carte scheme, sharing of monthly reach data etc.), would
enable it to emerge stronger than ever.
All of DITV’s strategy to reduce subsidy, improve payback period and focus on quality
additions are designed with an eye to improve FCFF generation and thereby, reduce
debt. DITV became FCFF positive in FY13, while in FY14, it generated FCFF of
Rs3.1bn. Over the next two years, we expect DITV to generate cumulative FCFF of
Rs5bn despite significant capex lined up. Debt reduction (repayment of Rs5.8bn in
FY14) remains a top priority. Debt is likely to reduce to Rs8.3bn by FY16E compared
to Rs11.8bn in FY14.
We believe current valuations offer attractive investment opportunity. With DITV’s
leadership position, pick-up in subscriber additions, focus on improving margins,
reduction in subsidy, improvement in FCFF generation and reduction of debt DITV is
bound to re-rate. We value DITV at 10x FY16 EV/EBITDA (close to its 2yr-range),
resulting in target price of Rs72 (upside potential of 26%) and recommend ‘BUY’.
Exhibit 35: 1yr. Forward EV/EBITDA
8.4
20.1
14.1
13.9
8.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Ap
r-1
0
Sep
-10
Feb
-11
Jul-
11
Dec
-11
May
-12
Oct
-12
Mar
-13
Au
g-1
3
Jan
-14
Jun
-14
EV/E (x) Peak(x) Avg(x)
Median(x) Min(x)
Source: Company Data, Bloomberg, PL Research
Exhibit 36: 1yr. Forward Mcap/Sales
1.5x
2.4x
3.3x
4.2x
5.1x
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
Mar
-10
Jun-
10
Sep
-10
Dec
-10
Mar
-11
Jun-
11
Sep
-11
Dec
-11
Mar
-12
Jun-
12
Sep
-12
Dec
-12
Mar
-13
Jun-
13
Sep
-13
Dec
-13
Mar
-14
Jun-
14
Source: Company Data, Bloomberg, PL Research
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 27
Income Statement (Rs m)
Y/e March 2013 2014 2015E 2016E
Net Revenue 21,668 25,090 27,449 31,483
Raw Material Expenses 11,155 13,358 14,389 16,191
Gross Profit 10,513 11,732 13,060 15,292
Employee Cost 822 891 988 1,133
Other Expenses 3,897 4,600 4,993 5,518
EBITDA 5,794 6,241 7,079 8,640
Depr. & Amortization 6,276 5,973 6,462 6,569
Net Interest 773 679 631 564
Other Income 511 649 400 300
Profit before Tax (1,254) (410) (14) 1,507
Total Tax — 1 — —
Profit after Tax (1,254) (411) (14) 1,507
Ex-Od items / Min. Int. (594) — — —
Adj. PAT (660) (411) (14) 1,507
Avg. Shares O/S (m) 1,064.8 1,065.0 1,065.0 1,065.0
EPS (Rs.) (0.6) (0.4) — 1.4
Cash Flow Abstract (Rs m)
Y/e March 2013 2014 2015E 2016E
C/F from Operations 7,701 9,847 7,245 8,433
C/F from Investing (9,061) (4,085) (6,083) (7,027)
C/F from Financing 1,171 (5,981) (2,500) (2,000)
Inc. / Dec. in Cash (189) (218) (1,338) (593)
Opening Cash 3,924 3,645 3,427 2,089
Closing Cash 3,735 3,427 2,089 1,496
FCFF 293 4,232 2,559 2,507
FCFE 2,620 (249) 559 1,007
Key Financial Metrics
Y/e March 2013 2014 2015E 2016E
Growth
Revenue (%) 10.7 15.8 9.4 14.7
EBITDA (%) 16.8 7.7 13.4 22.0
PAT (%) NA NA NA NA
EPS (%) NA NA NA NA
Profitability
EBITDA Margin (%) 26.7 24.9 25.8 27.4
PAT Margin (%) NA NA NA 4.8
RoCE (%) NA 2.0 7.0 26.6
RoE (%) NA NA NA NA
Balance Sheet
Net Debt : Equity (8.2) (2.7) (2.5) (4.2)
Net Wrkng Cap. (days) (62) (29) (50) (51)
Valuation
PER (x) NA NA NA 40.2
P / B (x) NA NA NA NA
EV / EBITDA (x) 12.6 11.1 9.7 7.8
EV / Sales (x) 3.4 2.8 2.5 2.1
Earnings Quality
Eff. Tax Rate — (0.1) — —
Other Inc / PBT NA NA NA 19.9
Eff. Depr. Rate (%) 17.5 15.0 13.9 12.2
FCFE / PAT NA 60.5 NA 66.8
Source: Company Data, PL Research.
Balance Sheet Abstract (Rs m)
Y/e March 2013 2014 2015E 2016E
Shareholder's Funds (1,556) (3,126) (3,135) (1,629)
Total Debt 16,330 11,849 9,849 8,349
Other Liabilities 1,632 1,060 1,060 1,060
Total Liabilities 16,406 9,783 7,774 7,781
Net Fixed Assets 20,873 17,797 17,417 17,875
Goodwill — — — —
Investments 3,525 2,954 5,300 7,300
Net Current Assets (7,995) (10,968) (14,944) (17,395)
Cash & Equivalents 3,645 3,426 2,089 1,496
Other Current Assets 3,502 3,524 3,224 3,697
Current Liabilities 15,142 17,919 20,256 22,588
Other Assets — — — —
Total Assets 16,404 9,783 7,774 7,781
Quarterly Financials (Rs m)
Y/e March Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14 Q4FY14
Net Revenue 5,784 5,926 6,238 6,369
EBITDA 1,217 1,478 1,581 1,289
% of revenue 21.0 24.9 25.3 20.2
Depr. & Amortization 1,444 1,504 1,534 1,491
Net Interest 77 135 204 125
Other Income 277 211 97 201
Profit before Tax (304) (161) (157) (327)
Total Tax — — — —
Profit after Tax (304) (161) (157) (1,491)
Adj. PAT (304) (161) (157) (327)
Key Operating Metrics
Y/e March 2013 2014 2015E 2016E
Subscribers (m)
Gross 15.1 16.6 19.0 22.1
Net 10.6 11.4 12.9 14.7
ARPU (Rs / Month) 158 164 172 174
Source: Company Data, PL Research.
Dish TV India
June 25, 2014 28
Prabhudas Lilladher Pvt. Ltd.
3rd Floor, Sadhana House, 570, P. B. Marg, Worli, Mumbai-400 018, India
Tel: (91 22) 6632 2222 Fax: (91 22) 6632 2209
Rating Distribution of Research Coverage
27.8%
52.8%
19.4%
0.0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
BUY Accumulate Reduce Sell
% o
f To
tal C
ove
rage
PL’s Recommendation Nomenclature
BUY : Over 15% Outperformance to Sensex over 12-months Accumulate : Outperformance to Sensex over 12-months
Reduce : Underperformance to Sensex over 12-months Sell : Over 15% underperformance to Sensex over 12-months
Trading Buy : Over 10% absolute upside in 1-month Trading Sell : Over 10% absolute decline in 1-month
Not Rated (NR) : No specific call on the stock Under Review (UR) : Rating likely to change shortly
This document has been prepared by the Research Division of Prabhudas Lilladher Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai, India (PL) and is meant for use by the recipient only as
information and is not for circulation. This document is not to be reported or copied or made available to others without prior permission of PL. It should not be
considered or taken as an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any security.
The information contained in this report has been obtained from sources that are considered to be reliable. However, PL has not independently verified the accuracy
or completeness of the same. Neither PL nor any of its affiliates, its directors or its employees accept any responsibility of whatsoever nature for the information,
statements and opinion given, made available or expressed herein or for any omission therein.
Recipients of this report should be aware that past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance and value of investments can go down as well. The
suitability or otherwise of any investments will depend upon the recipient's particular circumstances and, in case of doubt, advice should be sought from an
independent expert/advisor.
Either PL or its affiliates or its directors or its employees or its representatives or its clients or their relatives may have position(s), make market, act as principal or
engage in transactions of securities of companies referred to in this report and they may have used the research material prior to publication.
We may from time to time solicit or perform investment banking or other services for any company mentioned in this document.