6
DentalPhotography 398 Dental Update July/August 2008 Mike R Sharland An Update on Digital Photography for the General Dental Practitioner Abstract: Digital photography technology has moved on dramatically in recent years, with photography in general becoming an even greater part of the social scene. Th e popularity of camera mobile phones and compact cameras have been major factors in the resurgence in the popularity of general photography. So, how has this revival and technological advancement affected dental photography? Understanding the equipment, and how to use it successfully, is still impor tant, but many of the advancements have made life very much easier for the dental practitioner wanting to embrace this visual medium. Clinical Relevance:  This article will keep practitioners updated on the equipment available, and make the choice of equipment easier. Dent Update 2008; 35: 398-404  The articles published in 2004 1,2,3 covered a variety of techniques: these generally have not changed, so they will not be covered again in this article. However, information regarding camera settings etc. can be found at http//:www.thedigitaldentist-site.org.uk Getting started Camera choice It could be anticipated that a 4 Megapixel camera will be more than adequate for many years to come. 1 It is still adequate, but because of the constant hype, 5, 6, 7…..12 megapixels are the norm for most cameras. Do we really need all of those pixels? Yes and no! A higher pixel count means a higher resolution image, much higher than you would need for a computer monitor or a 7” x 5” print. But, with the popularity of image manipulation software such as Adobe Photoshop Elements®, and the increasi ng popularit y of the ‘RAW’ , a file type discussed later in this article, more pixels are a bonus. So as far as megapixels are concerned, more is better, but there are many other considerations, such as cost and storage options for these larger image files. What camer a? (Figure 1 ) Digital SLR (Single Lens Reflex) camera; Digital Compact camera; or ‘Bridge’ camera? Just the 3 choices then? Not quite, beh ind these three camera types is a huge choice of specifications. So where do you start? The author has already established that more megapixels can’t be a Mike R Sharland, Head of Multimedia Services, School of Dentistry, Univ ersity of Birmingham, St Chad’s Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, UK. bad thing, bu t both DSLR and Compact can have the same megapixel count. In 2004, camera choice was more limited, the cost-effective choice being a compact digital camera. Since then, D igital SLRs have dropped dramatically in price, though the lenses and flash necessary for dental photography have remained fairly static. A big gap in cost between DSLRs and compact cameras still exists. P ractices that are looking to the future, a nd want to promote a more professional image, will invest in a DSLR from the outset. The pros and cons for Compact, Bridge and DSLRs are shown in Table 1. Figure 1. A range of cameras all capable of intra-oral photography: (a) Digital SLR 2; (b) Bridge 3; (c) Compact. a b c

Digital Im

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Digital Im

8/8/2019 Digital Im

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/digital-im 1/6

DentalPhotography

Mike R Sharland

An Update on Digital Photografor the General Dental PractitioAbstract: Digital photography technology has moved on dramatically in recent years, with photography in general beco

greater part of the social scene. The popularity of camera mobile phones and compact cameras have been major factorsin the popularity of general photography. So, how has this revival and technological advancement affected dental photo

Understanding the equipment, and how to use it successfully, is still important, but many of the advancements have ma

Page 2: Digital Im

8/8/2019 Digital Im

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/digital-im 2/6

Denta

Camera type Viewing Method Lens Flash Advantages Disa

Compact LCD/Rangefinder Fixed Zoom Built in Size In

  Low cost N

  Can produce good

intra-orals

Bridge LCD or Viewfinder Fixed Zoom Pop-up Size P

(Electronic) Reasonably low cost idea

pho

  N

light sou

  N

DSLR Viewfinder Interchangeable Pop-up Point and shoot S

(LCD ‘Live View’*) Consistent quality results C

  N

an

Page 3: Digital Im

8/8/2019 Digital Im

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/digital-im 3/6

DentalPhotography

pixelated (individual pix

in the image). When usin

camera is enlarging the

 just like enlarging a 35 m

the user will get a ‘grainy

referred to as ‘noise’ in d

(Figure 3).

Digital zoomDSLRs.

In the previo

was mentioned that len

equipment can be used

some limited functions. T

there is a difference in m

between a lens designed

one designed for digital

in this is the way light hilenses specifically design

should get better image

Figure 3. Optical Zoom V Digital Zoom (2 images showing the effect of zooming in digitally).

Rangefinder LCD Viewfinder

Unsuitable for close up work, Live preview of image on Available on Bridge

il bl d (EVF*) d DSLR

Page 4: Digital Im

8/8/2019 Digital Im

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/digital-im 4/6

DentalPhotography

and can see little use for

the present time.

Electronic V

 This is a sma

magnifier lens for eye le

It is mainly used on ‘Brid

cameras. It gives a good

lens is seeing, however, feasy as a conventional v

below).

Through–th

Digital SLR (S

cameras view the image

the lens, and thus give t

exactly what is being ph

Light sources

 This is one ar

big developments since

a b

c d

Page 5: Digital Im

8/8/2019 Digital Im

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/digital-im 5/6

Denta

See Table 4 fo

file size in relation to cam

and file types.

Camera settings

Once camera

been purchased, the reswhether it is an inexpen

camera or an expensive

DSLR, are dependent on

settings. This will affect,

the exposure (light or da

the ‘depth of focus’ (how

acceptable focus from fr

mouth), and colour. Go t

thedigitaldentist-site.oauthor’s recommended

RAW TIFF JPG Fine JPG Normal JPG Basic

11.5 MB 36 MB 3.5 MB 2.5 MB 0.8 MB

Approximate sizes

Table 4. File size/type comparison based on a 12 megapixel DSLR.

Compose and

photograph image

(JPG & RAW)

Download to PC or

Laptop

Burn CDR/DVD or RAW

images only and store

in a safe location

Page 6: Digital Im

8/8/2019 Digital Im

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/digital-im 6/6

DentalPhotography

All practitioners should consider the benefits,

not just in the short term, but long term too,

especially in medico-legal terms, patient

education, staff training, etc.

By keeping to simple guidelines,

dental photography is well within the

capabilities of all staff and, in particular, the

dental nurse, who is in an ideal position to takephotographs throughout procedures with little

impact on surgery time and organization.

 The author’s ideal specifications

for photography in the dental practice are:

For Compact cameras:*

4 Megapixels+

Good ‘optical’ zoom

Good ‘macro’ capabilityManual control of aperture, shutter speed

and flash.

*Recommended Canon G9

For Digital SLRs:*

6 Megapixels+

100 mm* or 60 mm Macro lens

Ringflash*/LED Light/Colour CorrectedPortable light source

*Recommended Canon 400D or 450D/Sigma

105 mm Macro/Dine Ring and Point flash

Nikon D60 or D80/Sigma 105 mm Macro/Dine

Ring and Point flash.

Acknowledgements

 The author acknowledges the

support of Professor Trevor Burke, School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham.

References1. Sharland MR. Digita

the general dental p

1. Getting started. D

2004;31: 266−272.

2. Sharland MR. Digita

the general dental p

Intra-oral imaging. D

2004;31: 328−332.

3. Sharland MR. Digita

the general dental p

Extra- oral imaging.

2004;31: 385−390.

4. Turner J. Digital ima

update. Dent Update

385–395.5. http://www.bacd.c