Upload
hassan-mohiuddin
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
5
Activity-BasedCosting Systems
Asfandyar JahangirAzib Hamid
Hassan Mohi-ud-Din.
Asfandyar JahangirAzib Hamid
Hassan Mohi-ud-Din.
TRADITIONAL COSTING SYSTEMS
A single company-wide overhead ratebased on direct labor hours may be
used to allocate overhead to productsin these labor intensive processes.
A single company-wide overhead ratebased on direct labor hours may be
used to allocate overhead to productsin these labor intensive processes.
Traditional cost systems were created whenmanufacturing processes were labor intensive or machine
intensive
Traditional cost systems were created whenmanufacturing processes were labor intensive or machine
intensive
TRADITIONAL COSTING SYSTEMS
Job 1 Job 2
Labor Hours 2 6
In this example, overhead will be allocated to jobs using direct labor hours. If total overhead is $120,
how much will be allocated to each job?
In this example, overhead will be allocated to jobs using direct labor hours. If total overhead is $120,
how much will be allocated to each job?
TRADITIONAL COSTING SYSTEMS
Job 1 Job 2
Labor Hours 2 6
Overhead Allocation
30$ 90$
Overhead Rate = $120 ÷ 8 direct labor hoursOverhead Rate = $15 per direct labor hour
Job 1 = 2 hours × $15 per hour = $30Job 2 = 6 hours × $15 per hour = $90
The company introducesautomated machinery. Totaloverhead rises from $120 to
$420, while the labor timeneeded for Job 2 falls from
6 hours to 1 hour. Nowallocate the $420 overhead
to the two jobs.
TRADITIONAL COSTING SYSTEMS
TRADITIONAL COSTING SYSTEMS
Job 1 Job 2
Labor Hours 2 1
Overhead Allocation
280$ 140$
Overhead Rate = $420 ÷ 3 direct labor hoursOverhead Rate = $140 per direct labor hour
Job 1 = 2 hours × $140 per hour = $280Job 2 = 1 hour × $140 per hour = $140
TRADITIONAL COSTING SYSTEMS
Job 1 Job 2
Labor Hours 2 1
Overhead Allocation
280$ 140$
Is this a reasonable costing method?
Automation benefited only Job 2, but most of the
additional overhead cost was allocated to Job 1.
Clearly, we need to look for another cost driver.
UNDERCOSTING AND OVERCOSTING
Product Undercosting: A product consume a high level of resources but is reported to be a low cost per unit.
Product Overcosting: A product consumes a low level of resources but is reported to be a high cost per unit.
Product Undercosting: A product consume a high level of resources but is reported to be a low cost per unit.
Product Overcosting: A product consumes a low level of resources but is reported to be a high cost per unit.
PRODUCT-COST CROSS-SUBSIDISATION
If a company undercosts one of its products, it will overcost at least one of its other products and vice versa.
Emma James Jessica Matthew Total Average
Entrée $11 $20 $15 $14 $60 $15
Dessert 0 8 4 4 16 4
Drinks 4 14 8 6 32 8
Total $15 $42 $27 $24 $108 $27
If a company undercosts one of its products, it will overcost at least one of its other products and vice versa.
Emma James Jessica Matthew Total Average
Entrée $11 $20 $15 $14 $60 $15
Dessert 0 8 4 4 16 4
Drinks 4 14 8 6 32 8
Total $15 $42 $27 $24 $108 $27
ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING (ABC)
A costing method that identifies the activities performed within the organization as it delivers
its goods and services.
A costing method that identifies the activities performed within the organization as it delivers
its goods and services.
ProductsRequire
Activities
ActivitiesConsume
Resources
PeopleManage
Activities
ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING (ABC)
A costing method that assigns costs to products, based on the number of activities the
organization used in producing them.
A costing method that assigns costs to products, based on the number of activities the
organization used in producing them.
Lot size Directlabor hours
Processsetups
Designtime
Machinehours
Customercontact
AN ILLUSTRATION
Department
Cost Driver
VariableManufacturi
ngOverhead in
2011
Usage of Cost Drivers by Customer Contract
United Motors
Holden Motors
Leland Vehicle
Design CAD-Design hours
$ 39000 110 200 80
Production Engineering-hours
29600 70 60 240
Engineering Machine-hours 240000 120 2800 1080
Total 308600
AN ILLUSTRATION
Department
Cost Driver
VariableManufacturi
ngOverhead in
2011
Usage of Cost Drivers by Customer Contract
United Motors
Holden Motors
Leland Vehicle
Design CAD-Design hours
$ 39000 110 200 80
Production Engineering-hours
29600 70 60 240
Engineering Machine-hours 240000 120 2800 1080
Total 308600
CONTD….
Actual plant-wide variable MOH rate based on machine hours, $308,600/4,000
$77.15 per machine hour
United Motors
Holden Motors
Leland Vehicle Total
Variable manufacturing overhead, allocated based on machine hours ($77.15 120; $77.15 2,800; $77.15 1,080)
$9,258
$216,020
$83,322
$308,600
Department
Variable MOH in 2011
Total Driver Units Rate
Design $39,000 390 $100 per CAD-design hour
Production 29,600 370 $ 80 per engineering hour
Engineering 240,000 4,000 $ 60 per machine hour
United Motors
HoldenMotors
Leland Vehicle Total
Design-related overhead, allocated on CAD-design hours (110 $100; 200 $100; 80 $100)
$11,000
$ 20,000
$ 8,000
$ 39,000
Production-related overhead, allocated on engineering hours (70 $80; 60 $80; 240 $80) 5,600 4,800 19,200 29,600 Engineering-related overhead, allocated on machine hours (120 $60; 2,800 $60; 1,080 $60)
7,200
168,000
64,800
240,000
Total
$23,800
$192,800
$92,000
$308,600
United
MotorsHoldenMotors
LelandVehicle
a. Department rates (Requirement 2)b. Plant wide rate (Requirement 1)
$23,800
$ 9,258
$192,800
$216,020
$92,000
$83,322
Ratio of (a) ÷ (b) 2.57 0.89 1.10
Department Cost
DriverUnited Motors
HoldenMotors
LelandVehicle
DesignEngineeringProduction
CAD-design hoursEngineering hoursMachine hours
28%193
51%1670
21%6527
The variable manufacturing overhead allocated to United Motors increases by 157% under the department rates, the overhead allocated to Holden decreases by about 11% and the overhead allocated to Leland increases by about 10%.
The variable manufacturing overhead allocated to United Motors increases by 157% under the department rates, the overhead allocated to Holden decreases by about 11% and the overhead allocated to Leland increases by about 10%.
COST HIERARCHIESUNIT-LEVEL COST
Cost of activities performed on each individual unit of a product or service e.g., machine operation costs
BATCH-LEVEL COST Cost of activities related to group of units of a product or service rather
than each individual unit of product or service e.g., set up cost
PRODUCT-SUSTAINING COSTCost of activities under taken to support individual products or services regardless
of the number of units or batches e.g., design cost
FACILITY-SUSTAINING COSTCost of activities that cannot be traced to individual products or services but that
support the organization as a whole e.g., general admin cost
ABC– BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONSMore accurate and
informative product costs lead to better pricing decisions.
The activities driving costs are more accurately measured.
Managers gain easier access to the relevant costs.
More accurate and informative product costs lead to better pricing decisions.
The activities driving costs are more accurately measured.
Managers gain easier access to the relevant costs.
An ABC system is very expensiveto develop and implement, and
very time-consuming to maintain.
An ABC system is very expensiveto develop and implement, and
very time-consuming to maintain.
WHERE TO APPLY ABC-YO!!!
1. The Asif Zardari Rule:• Go where the money is!• Look for the areas of large indirect cost/support activities
2. High Complexity Rule:• Look for how different products, processes, customers are!
New Vs Mature products
Custom Vs Standard products
Infrequent Vs Frequent products
Small Vs Irregular products
Low volume Vs High volume
1. The Asif Zardari Rule:• Go where the money is!• Look for the areas of large indirect cost/support activities
2. High Complexity Rule:• Look for how different products, processes, customers are!
New Vs Mature products
Custom Vs Standard products
Infrequent Vs Frequent products
Small Vs Irregular products
Low volume Vs High volume
ABC IN SERVICE AND MERCHANDISING COMPANIES
The process is exactly the same as for manufacturing!
Identify and classify the activities related to the company’s products or services.
Estimate the cost of each activity identified in .
Calculate a cost-driver rate for each activity.
Assign activity costs to products using the relevant cost-driver rates.