View
226
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CONTROLLABLE VS NONCONTROLLABLE REVENUES AND COSTS
Can control all costs and revenues at some level of responsibility within the company
Critical issue under responsibility accounting:
Whether the cost or revenue is controllable
at the level of responsibility with which
it is associated
CONTROLLABLE VS NONCONTROLLABLE REVENUES AND COSTS
All costs controllable by top management
Fewer costs controllable as one moves down to lower levels of management
Controllable costs - costs incurred directly by a level of responsibility that are controllable at that level
Noncontrollable costs – costs incurred indirectly which are allocated to a responsibility level
RESPONSIBILITY REPORTING SYSTEM
Involves preparation of a report for each level of responsibility in the company's organization chart
Begins with the lowest level of responsibility and
moves upward to higher levels
Permits management by exception at each level of responsibility
RESPONSIBILITY REPORTING SYSTEM
Also permits comparative evaluations
Plant manager can rank the department manager’s effectiveness in controlling manufacturing costs
Comparative ranking provides incentive for a manager to control costs
TYPES OF RESPONSIBILITY CENTERS
Three basic types:
Cost centers
Profit centers
Investment centers
Indicates degree of responsibility that managers have for the performance of the center
TYPES OF RESPONSIBILITY CENTERS
Examples:Cost center: usually a production center or
service department.Profit center: individual departments of
retail stores and branch offices of banks.
Investment center: subsidiary companies
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING FOR COST CENTERS
Based on a manager’s ability to meet budgeted goals for controllable costs
Results in responsibility reports which compare actual controllable costs with flexible budget data
Include only controllable costs in reports
No distinction between variable and fixed costs
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING FOR COST CENTERS
Example – Fox Manufacturing Co.
Assumes department manager can control all manufacturing overhead costs except depreciation, property taxes, and his own monthly salary of $4,000
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING FOR PROFIT CENTERS
Based on detailed information about both controllable revenues and controllable costs
Manager controls operating revenues earned, such as sales,
Manager controls all variable costs (and expenses) incurred by the center because they vary with sales
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING FOR PROFIT CENTERS
Direct and Indirect Fixed Costs
May have both direct and indirect fixed costs Direct fixed costs
Relate specifically to a responsibility center Incurred for the sole benefit of the center Most controllable by the profit center manager
Indirect fixed costs Pertain to a company's overall operating activities Incurred for the benefit of more than one profit center Most not controllable by the profit center manager
PROFIT CENTERSResponsibility Reports
Shows budgeted and actual controllable revenues and costs
Prepared using the cost-volume-profit income statement format: Deduct controllable fixed costs from the
contribution margin Controllable margin - excess of contribution
margin over controllable fixed costs – best measure of manager’s performance in controlling revenues and costs
Do not report noncontrollable fixed costs
PROFIT CENTER -RESPONSIBILITY REPORTSExample – Marine Division
$60,000 of indirect fixed costs are not controllable by manager not shown
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING FOR INVESTMENT CENTERS
Controls or significantly influences investment funds available for use
ROI (return on investment) - primary basis for evaluating manager performance in an investment center
ROI shows the effectiveness of the manager in utilizing the assets at his or her disposal
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING FOR INVESTMENT CENTERS - ROI
ROI is computed as follows:
Operating assets include current assets and plant assets used in operations by the center.
• Exclude nonoperating assets such as idle plant assets and land held for future use
Base average operating assets on the beginning and ending cost or book values of the assets
INVESTMENT CENTERS - Responsibility Report Example – Marine Division
All fixed costs are controllable by manager
JUDGMENTAL FACTORS IN ROI
Valuation of operating assets May be valued at
acquisition cost, book value, appraised value, or market value
Margin (income) measure May be controllable margin,
income from operations, or net income
IMPROVING ROI ROI can be improved by
Increasing controllable margin or Reducing average operating assets
Assume the following data for Laser Division of Berra Manufacturing:
IMPROVING ROIIncreasing Controllable Margin
Increased by increasing sales or by reducing variable and controllable fixed costs
Increase sales by 10%• Sales increase $200,000 and contribution margin
increases $90,000 ($200,000 X 45%)
• Thus, controllable margin increases to $690,000 ($600,000 + $90,000)
• New ROI is 13.8%
IMPROVING ROIIncreasing Controllable Margin
Decrease variable and fixed costs 10%• Total costs decrease $140,000 [($1,100,000 + $300,000) X
10%]
• Controllable margin becomes $740,000 ($600,000 + $140,000 )
• New ROI becomes 14.8%
IMPROVING ROIReducing Average Operating Assets
Reduce average operating assets by 10% or $500,000
Average operating assets become $4,500,000 ($5,000,000 X 10%)
Controllable margin remains unchanged at $600,000
New ROI becomes 13.3%
PRINCIPLES OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Management function that compares actual results with budget goals
At center of responsibility accounting
Includes both behavioral and reporting principles
PRINCIPLES OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Behavioral Principles
Human factor – critical in performance evaluation
Behavioral principles: Managers of responsibility centers should have direct input
into the process of establishing budget goals for their area of responsibility
The evaluation of performance should be based entirely on matters that are controllable by the manager being evaluated
Top management should support the evaluation process The evaluation process must allow managers to respond to
their evaluations The evaluation should identify both good and poor
performance
PRINCIPLES OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Reporting Principles
Reporting principles for performance reports include reports which Contain only data that are controllable by the manager of
the responsibility center
Provide accurate and reliable budget data to measure performance
Highlight significant differences between actual results and budget goals
Are tailor-made for the intended evaluation
Are prepared at reasonable intervals
Summary of Study Objectives
Describe the concept of budgetary control. Preparing periodic budget reports to compare actual results
with planned objectives Analyzing the differences to determine causes Taking appropriate corrective action Modifying future plans, if necessary
Evaluate the usefulness of static budget reports Useful in evaluating the progress toward planned sales and
profit goals Also appropriate in assessing manager’s effectiveness in
controlling cost when
• Actual activity approximates budget activity level and/or
• Costs are fixed
Summary of Study Objectives
Explain the development of flexible budgets and the usefulness of flexible budget reports. Identify the activity index and the
relevant range Identify variable costs and determine
the budgeted variable cost per unit Identify fixed costs and the budgeted
amount for each cost Prepare budget for selected increments
of activity within relevant range Flexible budget reports permit
evaluation of manager’s performance
Summary of Study Objectives
Describe the concept of responsibility accounting. Accumulating and reporting revenues and costs on the basis of the
individual who has the authority to make the decisions
Manager’s performance judged on matters directly under manager’s control
Necessary to distinguish between controllable and noncontrollable fixed costs
Must identify three types of responsibility centers
• Cost centers
• Profit centers
• Investment centers
Summary of Study Objectives Indicate the features of responsibility
reports for cost centers. Compare actual costs with flexible
budget data
Reports show only controllable costs
No distinction is made between variable and fixed costs
Identify the content of responsibility reports for profit centers. For each profit center show
Contribution margin
Controllable fixed costs
Controllable margin
Summary of Study Objectives Explain the basis and formula used in evaluating
performance in investment centers. Primary basis for evaluating performance : return on investment
(ROI)
Formula for ROI:
Controllable margin ÷ average operating assets
Let’s ReviewLet’s Review
Under responsibility accounting, the evaluation of a manager’s performance is based on matters that the manager:
a. Directly controls
b. Directly and indirectly controls
c. Indirectly controls
d. Has shared responsibility for with another manager
Let’s ReviewLet’s Review
Under responsibility accounting, the evaluation of a manager’s performance is based on matters that the manager:
a. Directly controls
b. Directly and indirectly controls
c. Indirectly controls
d. Has shared responsibility for with another manager
APPENDIX: RESIDUAL INCOME – ANOTHER PERFORMANCE
MEASUREMENT
Most companies use ROI to evaluate investment performance
Significant disadvantage - ignores the minimum rate of return on operating assets Rate at which cost are covered and a
profit earned
APPENDIX: RESIDUAL INCOME – ANOTHER PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Example – Electronics Division of Pujols Manufacturing Co.
Electronics Division has the following ROI:
Considering producing a new product – Tracker To produce the product, operating assets increase $2,000,000 Tracker expected to generate an additional $260,000 of
controllable margin
APPENDIX: RESIDUAL INCOME – ANOTHER PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Example – Electronics Division
Making Tracking reduces ROI from 20% to 18%:
If only use ROI, would not produce Tracker However, if Electronics has a minimum rate of return of 10%,
Tracker would be produced because its ROI, 13%, is greater
APPENDIX: RESIDUAL INCOME COMPARED TO ROI
Use the residual income approach to evaluate performance using the minimum rate of return
Residual Income:
The income that remains after subtracting
from controllable margin the minimum rate of
return on average operating assets
APPENDIX: RESIDUAL INCOME COMPARED TO ROI
Example – Electronics Division
The residual income for Tracking:
With Tracker, Electronics’ residual income increases:
Thus, ROI can be misleading by rejecting a project that actually increases income
APPENDIX: RESIDUAL INCOME WEAKNESS
Attempting to evaluate a company only on maximizing residual income ignores the fact that
one division might use substantially fewer assets
to attain the same level of residual income
Electronics Division used $2,000,000 of average operating assets to generate $260,000 of residual income
Can a different division use fewer operating assets to generate a greater amount of residual income?
APPENDIX: RESIDUAL INCOME WEAKNESS
Example – Electronics Division vs. Seadog Division Seadog used $4,000,000 to generate $460,000 of controllable
margin
Using the residual income approach, both investments are equal However, this ignores the fact that Seadog
Required twice as many operating assets to achieve
the same level of residual income
Summary of Study Objective (Appendix)
Explain the difference between ROI and residual income. ROI is controllable income divided by average operating assets
Residual income is the income remaining after subtracting the minimum rate of return on average operating assets
ROI can provide misleading results because
Profitable investments can be rejected
when the investment reduces ROI
but increases overall profitability
COPYRIGHT
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the express written consent of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages, caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the express written consent of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages, caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.