25
Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy Mao, Harsh Vardhan – GE Grid Solutions Aaron Ingham, Barry Howe, Sarah Pink – Trachte Curtis Birnbach – Advanced Fusion Systems LLC Mark Adamiak – Adamiak Consulting LLC 2019 Texas A&M Protective Relaying Conference

Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency

Roy Mao, Harsh Vardhan – GE Grid Solutions

Aaron Ingham, Barry Howe, Sarah Pink – Trachte

Curtis Birnbach – Advanced Fusion Systems LLC

Mark Adamiak – Adamiak Consulting LLC

2019 Texas A&M Protective Relaying Conference

Page 2: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Electro Magnetic Pulse - EMP

Classification of wave into 3 time frames

Page 3: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

EMP E1 Pulse Shape – Rise Time ≈ 1 nsec

Page 4: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Man-Made EMP Pulse Shape – Before tuning

Time Scale: 10 nsec/div

Page 5: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Conducted EMP Path: CCVT

Page 6: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

CCVT Frequency Response Plot

0.00001

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

1 10 100 1000 10000

FrequencyG

ain

(P

U)

One Source Of Conducted EMP – With Attenuation…

Page 7: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Conducted EMP Mitigation: Optical Sensing

Faraday Current Sensor

Pockels Voltage Sensor

Provides Complete Electrical Isolation from Conducted EMP

Page 8: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy
Page 9: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

DHS Goals to Address EMP and GMD Events

• GOAL 1: Improve risk awareness of electromagnetic threats and hazards

• GOAL 2: Enhance capabilities to protect critical infrastructure from the impact of an electromagnetic incident (including new technology)

• GOAL 3: Promote effective electromagnetic-incident response and recovery efforts

Page 10: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

“Best” EMP-Resistant Design Practices: Grounding

• Low impedance ground conductors are essential• 6 inch wide by 0.08” copper is a good size for facility

grounds• Sub-surface ground systems should be low impedance

mesh of welded copper straps rather than a single heavy round wire at the perimeter of the protected area

• Round wire grounds should be avoided at all costs. They are inherently high impedance and reflect fast pulses rather than passing them to ground.

• All cable shields must be grounded at Point of Entry (POE)

Page 11: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

“Best” EMP-Resistant Design Practices: Buildings

• Conductors and buildings should be shielded with solid metal which covers all surfaces • Best performance: Seams/joints welded or soldered

• All cable entries must use proper shielding and bypass techniques• Waveguide style cable Points of Entry (POE) are essential • Cable shields need to be grounded to the exterior of the

waveguide POE• Doors must have a continuous electrical contact around

their perimeter when closed• Battery banks should be inside the shielded buildings, and

include shielded vent for hydrogen venting

Page 12: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

“Best” IED Design Practices

• Metal shielding on IED modules and chassis

• Use of copper strap/braiddue for lower inductance ground

• Use of Hardware Watchdog Timers

• Use of Error Correcting Code (ECC) Memory

• Use of Transient Voltage Suppression (TVS) Diodes

Page 13: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Overall Control House View

Corner joints are electrically bonded by continuous, mechanically-fastened, conductive brackets

Page 14: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

“Sealed” Door Design

Page 15: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Air Exchange Design

Page 16: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Cable Entry/Exit System

Page 17: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Cable Entry/Exit System via Wavequide

Page 18: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Test Chamber with Test Generator and Control House

Radiating antenna

E/B FieldSensors

Page 19: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Control Room with Pulse Displays

Page 20: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

IED Performance Categories

Category 1: There were NO IED component failures and the IED continued to operate without interruption

Category 2: There were NO IED component failures, however, the IED locked-up and had to be reset or auto re-booted

Category 3: There were component failures in the IED and normal operation was no longer possible

Page 21: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

IED Monitoring – Communicating and Re-boots

IED IED IED…

Ethernet Switch

Test Chamber

Shielded Control House

Control Room

All IED found to be communicating – No Re-Boots or Lock-ups

Multimode Fiber Cable

Page 22: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Control House Attenuation (with cables into house)

Page 23: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Direct EMP Signal Radiation

RELAY

IEDs have Passed the Radiated 50kV/m EMP Test with NO HW failures and NO Lockup

Page 24: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Conclusions

• Nuclear EMP is a low probability / high consequence event

• Man Made EMP is more probable but only has one wave

• EMP effects manifest themselves through both Radiated and Conducted

signals

• There are many design practices that can be employed to mitigate effects

from both Radiated and Conducted signals

• Testing has demonstrated how a shielded and well grounded control house

can minimize effects from both Radiated and Conducted EMP

• Testing in the industry in ongoing

Page 25: Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP ...prorelay.tamu.edu/.../sites/3/2019/03/Control-House...Control House and Relay Design Considerations for EMP Resiliency Roy

Thank You

Questions?