Constructed Wetland - Copy

  • Upload
    iastra

  • View
    232

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    1/26

    Constructed Wetlands Design

    Source: UN-HABITAT

    1

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    2/26

    Merits of constructed wetlands

    Smaller, decentralized, wastewater management

    Relatively inexpensive

    Natural system, simple design, construction to build where

    land is affordable Easily operated and maintained even by the community

    95% rural Europe

    2

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    3/26

    Major components of CW

    Basina shallow excavation

    Substratepermeable filler materialrock, gravel, sand, soil,

    supports plant roots

    Vegetationsame type of budding plants Linerfor protection of groundwater, if required

    Inlet/Outlet arrangement systemsubsurface flow, uniform

    distribution and collection of w/w

    Pollutant Removal Mechanisms in Constructed Wetlands - By

    various physical, chemical and biological processes

    3

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    4/26

    Advantages of CW

    wetlands can be less expensive to build than other treatment

    options

    utilization of natural processes,

    simple construction (can be constructed with local materials), simple operation and maintenance,

    cost effectiveness (low construction and operation costs),

    process stability

    4

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    5/26

    Limitations of CW

    large area requirement

    wetland treatment may be economical relative to other

    options only where land is available and affordable

    design criteria have yet to be developed for different types ofwastewater and climates

    5

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    6/26

    Design configurations of CW

    Many, based on various factors.

    Based on flow pattern in the wetlands:

    o free water surface flow

    o subsurface flowohorizontal

    o vertical

    Hybrid systems combine the best advantages of both HF and

    VF systems. They may beo HF followed by VF

    o VF followed by HF

    6

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    7/26

    Horizontal subsurface flow Vertical subsurface flow

    w/w flows under the surface of

    the bed in a more or lesshorizontal path

    w/w is fed from the top and then

    gradually percolates downthrough the bed and is collected

    at the base

    Slow flow through the porous

    surface

    Intermittent flow in a large batch

    flooding the surface

    Removal of TSS, BOD, COD,

    nitrates

    Removal of BOD, COD,

    pathogens. Nitrification occurs

    Limited oxygen transfer Oxygen transfer is good

    Smaller area than HF

    More effective than HF

    Better removal of TSS

    Clogging occurs with incorrect

    media

    7

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    8/26

    Design of constructed wetlands

    Substrate of the wetland can be clogged with debris, grit, and solids

    from raw wastewater. Therefore, a primary treatment should be

    provided to remove the settleable solids. This may be

    o screening and grit removal

    o Septic tanks

    o Anaerobic baffle reactor (Improved septic tank)

    8

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    9/26

    Design of constructed wetlands

    Surface area of wetland (Kickuth equation)

    = ln ln

    Where,

    Ah= Surface area of bed (m2)

    Qd= average daily flow rate of sewage (m3/d)

    Ci= influent BOD5 concentration (mg/l)

    Ce= effluent BOD5 concentration (mg/l)

    KBOD= rate constant (m/d)

    9

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    10/26

    = .

    Where,

    KT = K20(1.06)(T-20)

    K20

    = rate constant at 20C (d-1)

    T = operational temperature of system (C)

    d = depth of water column (m)

    recommended values: HF = 40 cm, VF = 70 cm

    n = porosity of the substrate medium (percentage expressed as

    fraction)

    KBODis temperature dependent and the BOD degradation rate

    generally increases about 10 % per 0C

    10

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    11/26

    Depth

    restricted to approximately the rooting depth of plants

    HRT (time the wastewater is retained in the wetland) is to be

    consideredRecommended depth

    HF: ~ 40 cm, considering precipitation, which causes surface

    flow

    VF: 70 cm, for nitrification

    11

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    12/26

    Bed cross section area (HF only)

    It is derived from Darcys law - subsurface flow through the gravel

    under average flow conditions. Assumptions:

    hydraulic gradient = slope, and

    hydraulic conductivity will stabilize at 10-3m/s in the established

    wetland

    Ac= Qs/ (Kf(dH/ds))

    Ac= Cross sectional area of the bed (m2)

    Qs= average flow (m3/s)

    Kf = hydraulic conductivity of the fully developed bed (m/s)

    For graded gravel: Kf = 1 x 10-3 to 3 x 10-3 m/s

    dH/ds = slope of bottom of the bed (m/m) (usually 1%)

    12

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    13/26

    Then, width of wetland = C S Area / depth of wetland

    Therefore, length of wetland = total surface area / width of wetland

    On partitioning wetland cell into n numbers, the Qeach cell= Qs/ n

    Recommendations:

    If the width of the wetland is more than 15 m, the wetland cellshould be partitioned to avoid short circuiting of wastewater inside

    the wetland.

    It is better to use at least two parallel cells instead of a single

    wetland cell for the ease in O&M

    Note:In VF wetlands, since the flow is vertical, the width and cross-

    sectional area of VF beds are not set by a requirement to keep the flow

    below surface and prevent surface flow

    13

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    14/26

    Substrate selection

    Recommended media:

    Intermediate-sized materials generally characterized as gravels. The

    gravels are washed because to remove fines that could block the void

    spaces.

    HF wetlands

    14

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    15/26

    Substrate selection

    VF wetlands

    15

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    16/26

    Bed slope

    Theoretically, the bottom slope should match the slope of the

    water level to maintain a uniform water depth throughout the

    bed.

    Practical approach: slope the bottom along the direction of

    flow from inlet to outlet

    slope of 0.5 to 1% is recommended

    16

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    17/26

    Sealing of the bed

    Coefficient of

    permeability k of

    native soil

    Interpretation

    k>10-6m/s the soil is too permeable and the wetlands must

    be lined

    k>10-7m/s some seepage may occur but not sufficiently toprevent the wetlands from having submerged

    condition

    k

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    18/26

    Inlet structurescommon types used

    HF

    Submerged perforated pipe

    (such as riser pipes with V-

    notches) Gabion feed

    Swivel tee

    Perforated pipe inlet

    Slotted pipe inlet

    Channel inlet

    VF

    Inlet structures for VFwetland comprises of anintermittent feeding tankwith distribution network.

    Types of inlets used:

    o Hydromechanicalsiphons

    o Network of pipes withdownward pointingholes

    18

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    19/26

    Outlet structures

    The design of subsurface flow wetlands should allow controlled

    flooding to 15 cm for desirable plant growth. Types of outlets:

    Adjustable weir

    Interchangeable section

    900Elbow arrangement

    Elbow outlets

    Flexible pipe outlet

    19

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    20/26

    Vegetation

    The plants should meet the following criteria

    Common in the region

    Deep, strong, fibrous roots

    Large biomass or stem densities Maximum surface area of roots for supporting microbial

    populations

    Commonly used: Phragmitessp. and Typhasp., of plants which

    includes the popular choicecommon reed

    20

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    21/26

    0.075 MLD

    Case studiesNepal

    The removal efficiencies of 6 CW in Nepal for TSS, BOD,

    COD have remained over 80% during 2006 -2007

    21

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    22/26

    0.0007 MLD

    Case studiesNepal

    The removal efficiencies of 6 CW in Nepal for TSS, BOD,

    COD have remained over 80% during 2006 -2007

    22

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    23/26

    0.03 MLD

    Case studiesNepal

    The removal efficiencies of 6 CW in Nepal for TSS, BOD,

    COD have remained over 80% during 2006 -2007

    23

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    24/26

    0.01 MLD

    Case studiesNepal

    The removal efficiencies of 6 CW in Nepal for TSS, BOD,

    COD have remained over 80% during 2006 -2007

    24

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    25/26

    0.0005 MLD

    Case studiesNepal

    The removal efficiencies of 6 CW in Nepal for TSS, BOD,

    COD have remained over 80% during 2006 -2007

    25

  • 8/12/2019 Constructed Wetland - Copy

    26/26

    0.075 MLD

    Case studiesNepal

    The removal efficiencies of 6 CW in Nepal for TSS, BOD,

    COD have remained over 80% during 2006 -2007

    26