Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
S
SCULPTOR
OR
GARDENER?
Dilemmas in
Strength-Based Education
Background
In a Danish research project [1], I identified VIA-strengths in children age 6-16 in order to confirm whether all 24 VIA-strength is developed by the age of 6 when the children
start school in Denmark, and to confirm at what age the different Character Strengths seem relatively stable corresponding to the criteria for VIA-strengths [2]. Lopez & Louis
[3] and Linkins et al [4] have suggested different principles for strength-based education and how to implement it in schools. The findings in my research project have an im-
pact on the pedagogical methods used in education as well as the upbringing of children making it necessary to discuss strength-based education and two different, common-
ly used strength-based approaches: The Sculptor cultivating specific and valued strengths or The Gardener nurturing and fertilizing the strengths of the specific child.
Aim
The research project aims to create new knowledge of strength development in children. Furthermore, to research pros and cons of cultivating or nurturing strengths in chil-
dren.
Method
750 children age 6-16 has identified their strengths using the Strength Compass [5] before and after strength-based interventions [1].
Results & Conclusions
All 24 VIA-strengths are developed at the age of 6 supporting the hypothesis of Seligman [6]: “I have no idea, but so far, I prefer to believe that normal infants have capacities
for each of the 24 strengths. The Strength-profile is developed during the first six years of life. When the child finds the niches that bring praise, love and attention, it cuts out
its strengths. The chisel is the interplay between the child's talents, interests and strengths, and as it detects what works and does not work in its small world, it will detail the
face of several strengths. At the same time it will get rid of excess material. After some time, there are regularities, and we find that each child presents the same ideosyncratic
strengths time after time.”
16 out of 24 VIA-strengths seem relatively stable from the age of 6. Whether we choose to be sculptors or to be gardeners, it is highly relevant to consider nurturing strengths
already established in the child, or sculpturing the strengths that are considered best at the time being in school or society; The way we handle our strengths-approach is as a
flashlight lightening up a specific area while others are left to darkness. The important message from the project is: “All 24 Character Strengths matter” [7]
References:
[1]Ledertoug, M.M. (2016): Strength-based Learning—Character Strengths as a mean to the learning potentials. Ph.D.-Thesis. Aarhus University, Denmark
[2]Peterson; C. & Seligman, M. (2004): Character Strengths and Virtues—A Handbook of Classification, New York. Oxford University Press
[3]Lopez, S.J & Louis, M.C (2009): The Principles of Strengths-Based Education. Journal of College & Character; Routledge.
[4]Linkins, M., Niemiec, R.M., Gillham, J. ,Mayerson, D. (2015): Through the Lens of Strengths: A Framework for Educating the Heart. The Journal of Positive Psychology
[5]Ledertoug, M.M. (2014): The Strengths Compass. Copenhagen, Dansk Psykologisk Forlag
[6]Seligman, M. (2002): Authentic Happiness. Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York: Free Press. p. 244-245.
[7]Niemiec, R.M. (2017) Character Strengths Interventions. A Field Guide for Practioners. Boston: Hogrefe.
StrengthsTotal
(N=2027)
Gender Diagnosis? Mother-tongue?
Boys
(N=1055)
Girls
(N=972)No (N=626)
Yes
(N=149)
Andet
(N=166)
Dansk
(N=609)
Creativity 6,4342 6,1869 6,7027** 6,6663 6,3152 6,5208 6,6201
Curiosity 6,5486 6,4892 6,6132 6,7208 6,9171 6,8043 6,7461
Openmindedness 6,2159 6,1663 6,2697 6,3466 6,6883 6,2927 6,4449
Love of learning 6,0148 6,1013 5,9210 6,2733 5,9002 6,2500 6,1884
Wisdom 6,1167 6,2230 6,0012 6,2831 5,8063* 5,8251 6,2913*
Courage 6,8135 7,1014 6,5011** 7,0477 6,9163 7,2126 6,9706
Perseverance 6,6145 6,6633 6,5615 6,7083 6,2164* 6,7885 6,5660
Honesty 7,0715 6,9067 7,2504** 7,2938 6,5745** 7,1144 7,1668
Energy & zest 7,2322 7,2228 7,2423 7,3800 7,2490 7,5423 7,3037
Love 7,4544 6,9593 7,9917** 7,6777 7,3665 7,4456 7,6648
Kindness 7,5892 7,3268 7,8740** 7,7396 7,8360 7,7969 7,7476
Social intelligens 6,7745 6,5693 6,9973** 7,0018 6,9086 7,0048 6,9781
Teamwork 7,0431 7,0641 7,0203 7,1860 7,7151** 7,2944 7,2859
Fairness 6,9397 6,7864 7,1062** 7,1020 6,8045 7,0203 7,0515
Leadership 5,6797 5,7377 5,6167 5,9072 5,5355 5,7925 5,8475
Foregiveness 6,6325 6,4860 6,7915* 6,9518 6,4550* 6,9378 6,8341
Modesty 6,1839 6,1315 6,2408 6,4078 6,3209 6,4410 6,3775
Prudence 6,3191 6,3178 6,3205 6,6079 6,2910 6,6481 6,5194
Self-control 6,1651 6,1455 6,1865 6,2964 5,9838 6,3375 6,2087
Appreciation of beauty 6,3155 5,8777 6,7907** 6,6592 6,3216 7,1262 6,4494**
Gratitude 7,2321 7,1721 7,2972 7,4234 7,0737 7,2869 7,3750
Hope & optimism 6,8287 6,8276 6,8300 6,9993 6,7219 7,1540 6,8893
Humor 7,4625 7,4967 7,4253 7,5944 7,0710* 7,7154 7,4334
Spirituality 5,6262 5,4951 5,7684 6,0946 5,4089* 6,8323 5,7257**
Tabel 1 Strengths mean for gender, diagnosis and mother-tongue
* p < 0,05** p < 0,01t-test for independent samples
Results:Topstrenght Topstrength Topstrength Topstrength Topstrength
Total Kindness Humor Love Energy and zest Gratitude
Boys Kindness Humor Courage Energy and zest Gratitude
Girls Kindness Humor Love Honesty Gratitude
Danish mother-
tongue
Kindness Humor Love Energy and zest Gratitude
Other mother-tongue Kindness Humor Love Energy and zest Teamwork
No diagnosis Kindness Humor Love Energy and zest Gratitude
Diagnosis Kindness Teamwork Love Energy and zest Gratitude
Table 2: Summary of top 5 strength for gender, mother-tongue language and diagnosis
Bottom strength Bottom strength Bottom strength
Total Spirituality Leadership Love of learning
Boys Spirituality Leadership Appreciation of beauty
Girls Spirituality Leadership Love of learning
Danish mother-tungue Spirituality Leadership Love of learning
Other mother- tungue Wisdom Leadership Love of learning
No diagnosis Spirituality Leadership Wisdom
Diagnosis Spirituality Leadership Wisdom
Table 3 : Summary of Bottom strength for gender, mother-tongue langue and diagnosis
Strengths Age 6-9 (N=586) Age 10-12 (N=774) Age 13-16 (N=651)
Creativity** 7,1938 6,4271 5,7877
Curiosity**6,8476 6,5822 6,2841
Openmindedness** 6,5861 5,9425 6,2584
Love of learning** 6,8427 5,9192 5,3923
Wisdom** 6,4474 5,9347 6,0718
Courage** 7,0143 6,9360 6,5212
Perseverance** 6,8566 6,6582 6,3568
Honesty 7,0222 6,9839 7,2524
Energy and zest** 7,7519 7,2711 6,7652
Love 7,6451 7,3927 7,3691
Kindness** 8,0315 7,5764 7,2284
Social intelligens** 7,0989 6,6523 6,6613
Teamwork** 7,6338 7,0764 6,5187
Fairness** 7,2442 6,8767 6,7620
Leadership** 6,2346 5,5120 5,4278
Forgiveness** 7,0716 6,6538 6,2338
Modesty** 6,6275 6,1732 5,8008
Prudence** 6,7314 6,2837 6,0301
Self-control* 6,4110 6,1433 5,9831
Appreciation of Beauty** 7,0522 6,3072 5,7290
Gratitude** 7,7325 7,3499 6,6675
Hope and optimism** 7,2998 6,8764 6,3721
Humor* 7,6215 7,5651 7,2486
Spirituality** 6,7633 5,6132 4,6651
Table 4 Strengths mean for age groups
* p < 0,05
** p < 0,01One-Way Anova
Conclusion:What can we learn from this?
• Kindness is the topstrength for all children & adolescents in Denmark
• Love
• Humor
• Energy & Zest
• Gratitude
• Are all among the most common topstrengths for children & adolescents in Denmark
• They are therefore an important source of well-being and achievement
ConclusionWhat can we learn from this?
• Love of learning & wisdom are among the lesser strengths for all most all children and adolescents
• We need to find new ways in education to ignite the fire of these strengths – using topstrengths as leverage
ConclusionWhat can we learn from this?
• Strengths seems to be rather stabile from 6 years of age when the children start school. This is in agreement with hypothesis made by Seligman.
• This is important knowledge for teachers in order to create strength-based education.
• It is also important knowledge for considering cultivating specific strengths or building on existing topstrengths.
Postdoc Mette Marie Ledertoug, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Email: [email protected]