Complaint Against Def. Beverly B. Martin

8/9/2019 Complaint Against Def. Beverly B. Martin

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-against-def-beverly-b-martin 1/26

PUBLIC CORRUPTION COMPLAINTAGAINST DEFENDANT BEVERLY B. MARTINCORRUPT U.S. CIRCUIT JUDGE

CERTIFIED DELIVERYFederal Bureau of Investigation5525 West Gray StreetTampa, FL 33609Phone: (813) 253-1000

DEFENDANT BEVERLY B. MARTINRECORD LACK OF IMMUNITY - PERPETRATION OF UNLAWFUL ACTS

1. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Defendant Beverly B. Martin (“Martin”) inher private individual capacity and official capacity as U.S. Circuit Judge. Defendant

Martin’s unlawful and criminal acts on record were outside any immunity and official capacity.FELONIES OUTSIDE ANY “ official ” CAPACITY

2. Under color of undocketed and/or falsified Cases ## 2010-10963 and 2010-10967 , Def.Martin falsified official records and documents and caused others to falsify for criminal andillegal purposes of extorting money and property under fraudulent pretenses of “ frivolity ”.

3. Def. Martin knew and concealed that the only paid judgment of record had been in theamount of $24.30 . When the Plaintiffs conclusively proved the prima facie criminality ,illegality , and nullity of a falsified “$5,048.60 judgment ”, which could nowhere be found,Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Def. Martin retaliated with further case fixing on “Jul 19 2010”.

COERCION, EXTORTION UNDER FALSE PRETENSES, AND COVER-UP

4. Def. Martin coerced the Plaintiff corruption victims to refrain from redressing their grievances of a facially falsified and un-recorded “$5,048.60 judgment ”, fake “writ of execution ”, Doc. # 425, and forged “ land parcels ”. No court had ever reviewed the recordforgeries of said fake “land parcels ”, and Def. Martin conspired with other Offenders tokeep it that way and keep Plaintiffs out of Court. Just like a Government whore, Def. Martin

procured her order through brazen fraud on the Court , Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540; see also 1.550.CONTEMPT OF FLORIDA LAW, CHAPTERS 55, 56, 71, 73, 74, 95, 712, FLA. STAT.

5. Def. Martin concealed that here nothing could have possibly become a lien on Plaintiffs’ property under Ch. 55, 56, 71, Fla. Stat.

MARTIN’S KNOWLEDGE OF CRIMES AND UNLAWFUL ACTS6. Defendant Corrupt Martin had knowledge of the actual commission of felonies such as, e.g.,

the falsifications of a. a “$5,048.60 judgment ”; b. an appeal [see Case ## 2010-10967, and/or 2010-10963];c. a “writ of execution ” [Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Doc. # 425];d. “ land parcels ” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 ” and “ 07-44-21-01-00001.0000 ”;e. a “ regulation ”, “resolution 569/875 ”, “ legislative act ”, and/or “ O.R. 569/875 ”.However, Def. Martin concealed and conspired to conceal said record falsifications . Hereeven though Def. Martin had knowledge of, e.g., judicial Co-Defendant Polster Chappell’s,



2

Steele’s, Pizzo’s, and Lazzara’s obstruction of justice and fraudulent concealment of facially forged “ land parcels ”, a falsified “writ of execution ”, falsified “$5,048.60

judgment ”, Corrupt Martin did not make the same known to some judge or person inauthority, but covered up for said Offenders in exchange for bribes , 18 U.S.C. §§ 3 , 4.

ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT

7. Defendant Crook Martin knew that Defendant principal Offenders Steele, Chappell, Pizzo,and Lazzara had committed record offenses and assisted said Offenders, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3 , 4.In particular, Martin assisted said Offenders with a facially fraudulent “ writ of execution ” andthe falsification and/or destruction of official records.

DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS UNDER COLOR OF FAKE “ writ ” AND “ resolution ”8. Defendant Martin deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs, e.g., under color of a fake “writ of

execution ”, “resolution 569/875 ”, and “ frivolous appeal ”, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242.RECORD RETALIATION UNDER COLOR OF WRIT OF EXECUTION & SANCTIONS

9. With the intent to retaliate , Corrupt Martin knowingly took actions harmful to the Plaintiff public corruption victims, which included interference with Plaintiffs’ livelihood and recordland ownership, because the Plaintiff landowners had provided truthful information relating

to the commission of Federal offenses to law enforcement, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1513.EXTORTION ASSISTANCE UNDER COLOR OF “ FRIVOLOUS APPEAL ”10. Knowingly, Def. Martin assisted the extortion of Plaintiffs’ property and/or threatened to do

so, with corrupt intent to retaliate against the Plaintiffs because the Plaintiffs had blown thewhistle on public corruption; in particular, because the Plaintiffs had produced records andtestimony conclusively evidencing Government corruption and fraud, and information aboutthe commission of Federal offenses by Government Officials. Here, Plaintiff Governmentcrime and corruption victims had the right to be reasonably protected from the GovernmentOffenders and Judges of record, 18 U.S.C. § 3771.

CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND COURT ACCESS11. Def. Martin conspired with other Defendants and Officials to “ restrict Appellant’s ability to

pursue future appeals ” for, e.g., criminal and unlawful purposes of concealing:a. Facially forged “land parcels ” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 ” and “ 07-44-21-01-

00001.0000 ”; b. Falsification of [a recorded “ $24.30 judgment” into] an un-recorded “$5,048.60 ”-

extortion-and-execution scheme;c. Falsification of a “writ of execution ” in the absence of a recorded “$5,048.60”

“judgment”;d. Destruction and falsification of official Court records.

EXACTION OF MONEY BY THREAT OF, E.G., ARREST AND CIVIL CONTEMPT12. Def. Martin conspired to exact money from Plaintiffs under color of, e.g., “ frivolous appeal ”

even though Martin knew that no legal basis for and justification of “ frivolity ” had ever or could have possibly ever existed .

CONSPIRACY TO ASSIST EXTORTION AND BLACKMAIL13. In particular, Def. Martin conspired and assisted to extort $5,048.60 and property in the

absence of any recorded authentic judgment and justification . Martin caused other Government Officials to falsify , alter , and destroy official records for criminal and illegal

purposes of concealing other Defendant Officials’ extortion , coercion , obstruction of justice and other crimes of record.



3

14. Def. Martin made unlawful communications and threatened Plaintiff public corruptionwhistleblowers with obstruction of court access and deliberate deprivations of Plaintiffs’express fundamental rights to redress Government grievances, own property, and exclude Governments.

MISCONDUCT AND EXTENSION OF RECORD CRIMES AND FALSIFIED “ WRIT ”

15. Under prima facie fraudulent pretenses of “ frivolous appeal ”, Def. Martin recklesslyextended the record Government crimes, and FIXED and “DISMISSED ASFRIVOLOUS” . Def. Martin assisted and conspired the reckless perversion andfalsification of a recorded “ Judgment ” and “ Bill of Costs ” in the amount of $24.30 “issued asmandate on 06/11/2009” for criminal and illegal purposes of extortion , coercion , andretaliation against the Plaintiff corruption whistle blowers. In order for the record fraud under said fake “land parcels ” to continue and for illegal purposes of silencing the Plaintiff landowners, Def. Martin “ SUSPENDED ” and perverted the Rules and caused the Clerk to“discard ” more documents.

FALSIFICATION OF APPEAL NUMBERS16. The payment records regarding Plaintiffs’ multiple appeals conclusively proved the

falsifications and fabrications of “Appeal Number 10-10963 and/or 10-10967”. See U.S.District Court payment records and receipts. The U.S. Clerk refused to certify andauthenticate the payment record. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 44.

17. Def. Martin pulled “ frivolity ” out of her ass without any explanation and/or justificationwhatsoever. Review of the recorded judgment patently clearly evidenced that the District andCircuit had fabricated “lack of jurisdiction ” for illegal purposes of concealment and cover-up. Plaintiffs were entitled to defend their unimpeachable, unencumbered, and marketablerecord title against Government extortion and fraud , which of course had invoked Federal

jurisdiction directly under the express guarantees of the Federal and Florida Constitutions.18. Here with wanton disregard for the law, and including Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540, 1.550, Ch. 55,

56, 71, 73, 74, 95, 712, Fla. Stat., Def. Martin conspired to oppress Plaintiffs with primafacie non-existent and/or illegal orders, judgments, and/or mandates…

/s/Jorg Busse, M.D., M.M., M.B.A.c/o International Court of JusticePeace PalaceThe Hague, Netherlands

/s/Jennifer Franklin Prescottc/o International Court of JusticePeace PalaceThe Hague, Netherlands

CCFlorida Department of Law EnforcementU.S. Department of JusticeThe Florida Bar Real Property Probate and Trust Lawyer Section, The Florida Bar Barack Hussein ObamaEric Holder





5





7



8





10



11



12



13



14



15



16



17



18



19



20



21



22



23





25



Documents

Complaint Against Def. Beverly B. Martin