1
We simulated a real-world precipitation event from 05.07.2012 in Worringen, which is a quarter of the city of Cologne, Germany. Worringen is situated 15 km north of the city centre, on the left bank of the river Rhine. The plot on the left side shows the precipitation during the event. We handle the precipitation by incorporating it into the source terms of the shallow water equations. The same amount of water is added (1mm) to all cells at discrete times with a frequency determined by the precipitation rate. We used uniform roughness throughout the simulation domain and reflective boundary conditions. The simulation results were compared against both real-world photographs and data provided by a consulting agency that used MIKE FLOOD to simulate the same event. Historical Storm Water Event in Cologne, Germany Visdom (CN15) 200 m MIKE FLOOD 200 m The most commonly seen river channel pattern in nature is meandering. In order to test the model's capability to simu- late the flow in meandering channels, the verification was conducted first for a U-shaped 180° channel. The configura- tion of the physical model is shown in the figure to the left. This test case is based on the laboratory experiment of De Vriend (1979). An inflow discharge of 1.89m³ is prescribed at the entrance and a constant water elevation of 1.953m is maintained at the other end. The simulation is stopped when the solution has converged, i.e., a steady-state is reached. Measurements were done at cross sections (C3-C23) along the flume. The figure below compares the depth-averaged velocities. Blue areas represent the simulat- ed ones, while data from the laboratory measurements are plotted as dotted lines in grey color. Flow in a U-shaped Channel 3.4m 1.7m 5.1m 6.0m Outlet Inlet The water surface elevation in curved channels has characteristics of superelevation. The water surface elevation at the outer bank side (triangle up) is higher than the one along the inner bank (triangle down) due to the centrifugal force. There are multiple sources of discrepancies between the measured and the simulated data. First, we use a regular grid, where the cells are not aligned to follow the curvature of the flume. Second, the numerical scheme (CN15) is first order only. Its second order extension allows us to capture the flow more accurately in the boundary layer. Third, in curved channels there are distinc- tive characteristics that are completely three dimensional and cannot be simulated with a depth-averaged model. In the figure below, a comparison of computed and measured free surface elevations is shown. In order to examine the performance of the schemes, a dam-break flow generated in laboratory experiments is simulated. This experimental study was conducted at the Hydraulic Research Laboratory, Châtelet. The dam-break wave is generated by instantaneous removal of a gate impounding a water reservoir. The evolution of the resulting flood wave is measured as water levels over time at various gauge points in the downstream region. The schematic layout of the experiment is shown in the figure above. The side boundaries are solid walls, and the down-stream boundary condition is an open boundary. The mesh size in x and y directions is 0.01m. The water levels are measured at 7 observation stations (red arrows in the figure), of which here we show four in the plots below. Dam-break Over a Triangular Hump Reservoir Hump 15.5m 10m 6m 38m 0.75m 0.4m Outlet 2 10 20 11 8 13 4 Gauge 4 Gauge 10 Gauge 13 Gauge 20 We compare three schemes: KP07, HWP14, CN15. The HWP14 scheme is an improved version of the KP07, and they only differ in the treatment of dry/wet boundaries. To reconstruct the point values needed for the flux computation, the KP07 and HWP14 require a bilinear interpolation of the bathyme- try. The CN15 is based on a hydrostatic reconstruction in which both bathymetry and water surface are reconstructed locally at the same time. All schemes use the same HLL numerical flux. The CN15 has many advantages compared to the KP07 and HWP14. First, it is easier to implement, second it has less memory and computational burden, and last it is less oscillatory both at wet regions and partially dry regions. However, it is only first-order accurate in space. Its extension to second-order accuracy needs further reasearch. Shallow Water Schemes jk , 1 2 jk , 1 2 j k 1 2 , j k 1 2 , + y +x hu hv KP07, HWP14 jk , 1 2 jk , 1 2 j k 1 2 , j k 1 2 , + y +x hu hv CN15 Abstract We present a comparison and validation of three numerical schemes (KP07, HWP14, CN15) which simu- late the 2D surface flow by solving the shallow water equations. All schemes were implemented within the Visdom software framework on regular cartesian grids. In order to validate the schemes both synthetic and real-world cases are used. We compare our simulation results against analytical solutions, laboratory measurements, and data provided by other simulation tools (Hydro_AS-2D, MIKE FLOOD). In this poster, we describe some of the validation cases. We focus on two laboratory cases, a one-dimen- sional dam break with a triangular hump, a two-dimensional U-shaped flume, and a real-world precipi- tation event in the city of Cologne in Germany. Zsolt Horváth, Jürgen Waser, Andreas Buttinger-Kreuzhuber, Daniel Cornel, Artem Konev, Günter Blöschl Comparison and Validation of three Shallow Water Schemes on Synthetic and Real-World Cases

Comparison and Validation of three Shallow Water Schemes ...visdom.at/media/pdf/publications/Poster_2016.pdf · KP07, HWP14 jk, 1 2 jk, 1 2 jk 1 2, jk 1 2, +y +x hu hv CN15 Abstract

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparison and Validation of three Shallow Water Schemes ...visdom.at/media/pdf/publications/Poster_2016.pdf · KP07, HWP14 jk, 1 2 jk, 1 2 jk 1 2, jk 1 2, +y +x hu hv CN15 Abstract

We simulated a real-world precipitation event from 05.07.2012 in Worringen, which is a quarter of the city of Cologne, Germany. Worringen is situated 15 km north of the city centre, on the left bank of the

river Rhine. The plot on the left side shows the precipitation during the event. We handle the precipitation by incorporating it into the source terms of the shallow water equations. The same amount of water is added (1mm) to all cells at discrete times with a frequency determined by the precipitation rate. We used uniform roughness throughout the simulation domain and re�ective boundary conditions. The simulation results were compared against both real-world photographs and data provided by a consulting agency that used MIKE FLOOD to simulate the same event.

Historical Storm Water Event in Cologne, Germany

Visdom (CN15)

200 m

MIKE FLOOD

200 m

The most commonly seen river channel pattern in nature is meandering. In order to test the model's capability to simu-late the �ow in meandering channels, the veri�cation was conducted �rst for a U-shaped 180° channel. The con�gura-tion of the physical model is shown in the �gure to the left. This test case is based on the laboratory experiment of De Vriend (1979). An in�ow discharge of 1.89m³ is prescribed at the entrance and a constant water elevation of 1.953m is maintained at the other end. The simulation is stopped when the solution has converged, i.e., a steady-state is reached. Measurements were done at cross sections (C3-C23) along the �ume. The �gure below compares the depth-averaged velocities. Blue areas represent the simulat-ed ones, while data from the laboratory measurements are plotted as dotted lines in grey color.

Flow in a U-shaped Channel

3.4m1.7m

5.1m

6.0m

Outlet Inlet

The water surface elevation in curved channels has characteristics of superelevation. The water surface elevation at the outer bank side (triangle up) is higher than the one along the inner bank (triangle down) due to the centrifugal force.

There are multiple sources of discrepancies between the measured and the simulated data. First, we use a regular grid, where the cells are not aligned to follow the curvature of the �ume. Second, the numerical scheme (CN15) is �rst order only. Its second order extension allows us to capture the �ow more accurately in the boundary layer. Third, in curved channels there are distinc-tive characteristics that are completely three dimensional and cannot be simulated with a depth-averaged model. In the �gure below, a comparison of computed and measured free surface elevations is shown.

In order to examine the performance of the schemes, a dam-break �ow generated in laboratory experiments is simulated. This experimental study was conducted at the Hydraulic Research Laboratory, Châtelet. The dam-break wave is generated by

instantaneous removal of a gate impounding a water reservoir. The evolution of the resulting �ood wave is measured as water levels over time at various gauge points in the downstream region. The schematic layout of the experiment is shown in the �gure above. The side boundaries are solid walls, and the down-stream boundary condition is an open boundary. The mesh size in x and y directions is 0.01m. The water levels are measured at 7 observation stations (red arrows in the �gure), of which here we show four in the plots below.

Dam-break Over a Triangular Hump

Reservoir

Hump

15.5m 10m 6m

38m

0.75

m

0.4m

Outlet

2 10 2011

8

13

4

Gauge 4 Gauge 10

Gauge 13 Gauge 20

We compare three schemes: KP07, HWP14, CN15. The HWP14 scheme is an improved version of the KP07, and they only di�er in the treatment of dry/wet boundaries. To reconstruct the point values needed for the �ux computation, the KP07 and HWP14 require a bilinear interpolation of the bathyme-try. The CN15 is based on a hydrostatic reconstruction in which both bathymetry and water surface are reconstructed locally at the same time. All schemes use the same HLL numerical �ux. The CN15 has many advantages compared to the KP07 and HWP14. First, it is easier to implement, second it has less memory and computational burden, and last it is less oscillatory both at wet regions and partially dry regions. However, it is only �rst-order accurate in space. Its extension to second-order accuracy needs further reasearch.

Shallow Water Schemes

j k, 1

2

j k, 1

2

j k1

2, j k1

2, y

x

hu

hv

KP07, HWP14

j k, 1

2

j k, 1

2

j k1

2, j k1

2, y

x

hu

hv

CN15

AbstractWe present a comparison and validation of three numerical schemes (KP07, HWP14, CN15) which simu-late the 2D surface �ow by solving the shallow water equations. All schemes were implemented within the Visdom software framework on regular cartesian grids. In order to validate the schemes both synthetic and real-world cases are used. We compare our simulation results against analytical solutions, laboratory measurements, and data provided by other simulation tools (Hydro_AS-2D, MIKE FLOOD). In this poster, we describe some of the validation cases. We focus on two laboratory cases, a one-dimen-sional dam break with a triangular hump, a two-dimensional U-shaped �ume, and a real-world precipi-tation event in the city of Cologne in Germany.

Zsolt Horváth, Jürgen Waser, Andreas Buttinger-Kreuzhuber, Daniel Cornel, Artem Konev, Günter Blöschl

Comparison and Validation of three Shallow Water Schemes on Synthetic and Real-World Cases