Upload
hoangdiep
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-1
CHAPTER 10 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
10.1 Overall Implementation Plan for Major Road Development in Mamminasata Metropolitan Area
Figure 10.1.1 shows major on-going and future road developments in the Mamminasata Metropolitan area including four F/S roads and one Pre-F/S road undertaken by the JICA Study Team. These are part of the secondary arterial road network system in the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area.
Of these, the ongoing road projects and plans to be completed or recommended to be completed by 2010 are: - Jl. Hertasning (on-going) - Jl. Ir.Sutami, Toll and Frontage Roads (on-going) - Jl. A.D.Pettarani (Jl.Tol Reformasi) - Jl.Urip Sumoharjo Flyover (on-going) - Jl. Urip Sumoharjo / Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan, widening from the existing 4 lanes to 6 lanes
(on-going) - Maros - Pangkep Road, widening from the existing 2 lanes to 4 lanes (on-going) - Jl.Malino, widening from the existing 2 lanes to 4 lanes (planned) - KIMA/Jl.Ir.Sutami Access Road, widening from the existing 2 lanes to 4 lanes (proposed)
As the budget being allocated for the road infrastructure development would be limited as outlined in Section 3.3 of this Report, the implementation schedule of those road infrastructures should be carefully planned to attain the maximum benefits for the nation, region, local communities and people. Stage implementation approach should be applied in principle.
Figure 10.1.2 shows a preliminary implementation schedule drawn taking the road network, traffic demand and yearly budget balance into consideration. It shows approximate road length, construction costs, classification of development/improvement, number of lanes, expected financial source (tentative) and timing/period of construction. Figure 10.1.3 shows a five-year sequence of road development/improvement for those listed roads and forecast traffic flows on the Mamminasata road network. The upper figures are the traffic in pcu in the “without project” case at a five-year interval. The lower figures indicate the projects, based on the traffic flow in the “with project” case, to be completed at every five-year period with a list of road link names on the bottom. Most of the road sections of which volume capacity ratio (VCR) is over 1.00 are solved by the planned road projects in the next five-year term. There would be no road links which may constrain the efficient traffic flow by 2023 (F/S target year)1 except two road links: the Airport Access Road and Jl. Urip Sumoharjo.
1 The target year of the Sulawesi Island arterial roads for MP was changed from year 2023 to 2024 at the 2nd workshop on 10th September 2007 at Makassar. The target year of the F/S remains to be 2023 as defind in the original Scope of Work agreed by GOJ and GOI
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-2
Figure 10.1.1 Overall Road Development Plan for Mamminasata Metropolitan Area
Tam
bua/
Kec.M
aros
Uta
ra
Sung
gum
inas
a
1-d
New
Port
Jene
bera
n g R
iver
Maro
s Rive
r
Jl.P
erin
tis
Jl.
Ir.
Suta
mi
Tallo
Rive
r
Taka
lar
KIMA
Gales
ong 8
12
14
11
15
13
7
9
10
17
16
FS
Road b
y JIC
A
(Mar
os-T
akala
r)P
re-FS
Road
by
JIC
A Oute
r Ring
Roa
d
Mam
mina
sa B
ypas
s
Tran
s-Su
lawes
i Roa
dM
amm
inasa
ta S
ectio
n
Herta
sning
Roa
d
Abdu
llah
Daen
g Si
rua
Road
1 2
3 4
5
1-c
2
2
2
3
4
5-b
5-a
Maro
s
6
18
20
19
1-a
1-b
1-d
5-c
17
Leng
thD
evel
opm
ent
(km
)C
lass
ifica
tion
JIC
A FS
/ Pr
e-FS
Roa
d C
onst
ruct
ion
15.
0N
ew7.
6N
ew19
.7N
ew16
.7N
ew2
*15
.9N
ew31
.2W
iden
ing
38.
6W
iden
ing
47.
0W
iden
ing
8.3
New
57.
1N
ew7.
3N
ew9.
8N
ew
6Ir.
Sut
ami R
oad
(Tol
l & F
ront
age)
11.0
New
- T
allo
Riv
er B
ridge
Wid
enin
gW
iden
ing
- F
ull I
nter
chan
ge7
KIM
A/J
l.Ir.S
utam
i Acc
ess
Roa
d W
iden
ing
2.6
Wid
enin
g8
30.0
Wid
enin
g9
Wes
t Coa
st R
oad
Wid
enin
g (4
-lane
s)8.
0W
iden
ing
(T
g,B
unga
- M
.Byp
ass
Sec
tion)
10M
alin
o R
oad
Wid
enin
g8.
5W
iden
ing
11M
amm
inas
a B
ypas
s &
KIM
A C
onne
ctio
n5.
0N
ew12
Cen
tral R
adia
l Roa
d2.
2N
ew13
Mid
dle
Rin
g Tg
.Bun
ga E
xten
sion
4.5
New
14Jl
.Ir.S
utam
i - T
ambu
a(N
orth
Coa
stal
Roa
d)24
.0N
ew15
New
Por
t Acc
ess
Roa
d4.
0N
ew16
Cen
tral R
adia
l Roa
d W
est E
xten
sion
3.0
New
17In
ner R
ind
Roa
d C
osta
l Sec
tion
- C
oast
Lin
e (L
osar
i Bea
ch to
Har
bor)
5.3
New
- S
outh
Rin
g2.
5N
ew18
Jl. P
etta
rani
- Jl
.Uri p
Fly
over
(1)
New
-
Jl. P
etta
rani
- Jl
.Urip
Fly
over
(2)
New
19*
Jl.U
ri p /
Jl. P
erin
tis W
iden
ing
(6 la
nes)
16.0
Wid
enin
g
- Jl
.Per
intis
-Jl.D
aya
Jct.
(wid
enin
g to
8 la
nes)
10.0
Wid
enin
g20
Mar
os -P
angk
ep R
oad
Wid
enin
g ( 4
-lane
s)20
.0W
iden
ing
Not
e: *
Tra
ns-S
ulaw
esi M
amm
inas
ata
Roa
d
Oth
er R
oads
Con
stru
ctio
n
Wes
t Coa
st R
oad,
Tg.
Bun
ga-T
akal
ar (W
iden
ing
- Mar
os B
ypas
s
Tran
s-S
ulaw
esi M
amm
inas
ata
Roa
d
- M
aros
-M.R
ing
& Bo
ka -
Taka
lar
- Mak
assa
r Se
ctio
n
Out
er R
ing
Roa
d
Abd
ulla
h D
aeng
Siru
a
- Mar
os/G
owa
- Mar
os-K
IMA
Acc
ess
- Mid
dle
Sec
tion
(KIM
A Ac
cess
-Jl.
Mal
ino)
Mam
min
asa
Byp
ass
Roa
d Li
nk a
nd S
ectio
n N
ame
- Jl.M
alin
o-M
. Byp
ass
Sec
tion
(Sou
th)
- Jl.
Mal
ino-
Sou
th S
ectio
n (J
l.Tj.B
unga
)
- Jl.P
erin
tis-J
l.Sut
ami (
Priv
ate
Sect
or)
- Jl.P
erin
tis-J
l.Mal
ino
- M
.Rin
g an
d S
outh
Ext
entio
n
Her
tasn
ing
Roa
d (S
ectio
ns C
& D
)
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-3
Figure 10.1.2 Overall Implementation Schedule of Road Development in Mamminasata Metropolitan Area
Leng
th*
Con
stru
ctio
n*C
lass
ifica
tion
Num
ber o
fFi
nanc
ial
Per
iod
(km
)C
ost (
Bil.R
p)La
nes
Sour
ce**
1
5.0
88N
ew4
APB
N20
16-2
017
7.6
90N
ew4
APBN
/APB
D20
21-2
023
18.7
280
New
4Ex
tern
al S
oft L
oan
(APB
N/A
PBD
) or P
rivat
eSe
ctor
Inve
stm
ent
2013
-201
5
16.7
250
New
4AP
BN/A
PBD
2019
-202
3
2
15.9
461
New
6 &
4Ex
tern
al S
oft L
oan
(APB
N)
2010
-201
2
31.2
379
Wid
enin
g6
& 4
Exte
rnal
Sof
t Loa
n (A
PBN
)20
13-2
015
38.
610
6W
iden
ing
4AP
BD
Up
to 2
010
410
6
2.5
26W
iden
ing
4AP
BD
2006
-200
9
7.0
91W
iden
ing
4AP
BD
2010
-201
1
8.3
124
New
4Ex
tern
al S
oft L
oan
(APB
N/A
PBD
) or P
rivat
eSe
ctor
Inve
stm
ent
2012
-201
5
5
7.1
0N
ew4
Priv
ate
Sect
or20
09-2
011
7.3
193
New
4AP
BN/A
PBD
2015
-201
7
9.8
115
New
4AP
BN/A
PBD
2021
-202
3
6Ir.
Suta
mi R
oad
(Tol
l & F
ront
age)
11.0
0N
ew4
+ 4
BO
TU
p to
200
9
- T
allo
Riv
er B
ridge
Wid
enin
g0
Wid
enin
g8
BO
T20
14-2
015
- I
nter
chan
ge0
BO
T20
14-2
015
7K
IMA
/Jl.I
r.Sut
ami A
cces
s R
oad
Wid
enin
g2.
631
Wid
enin
g4
APB
D20
09-2
010
830
.045
Wid
enin
g2
(7m
)AP
BN/A
PBD
2009
-201
2
9W
est C
oast
Roa
d W
iden
ing
(4-la
nes)
8.0
60W
iden
ing
4AP
BN/A
PBD
2016
-201
8
(T
g,Bu
nga
- M.B
ypas
s Se
ctio
n)
10M
alin
o R
oad
Wid
enin
g8.
534
Wid
enin
g4
APB
D20
08-2
010
11M
amm
inas
a B
ypas
s &
KIM
A C
onne
ctio
n5.
050
New
4AP
BN/A
PBD
2018
-201
9
12C
entra
l Rad
ial R
oad
2.2
26N
ew4
APBN
/APB
D20
13-2
016
13M
iddl
e R
ing
Tg.B
unga
Ext
ensi
on4.
554
New
4AP
BN/A
PBD
2013
-201
4
14Jl
.Ir.S
utam
i - T
ambu
a(N
orth
Coa
stal
Roa
d)24
.010
8N
ew2
APBN
/APB
D20
17-2
020
15N
ew P
ort A
cces
s R
oad
4.0
0N
ew4
BO
T20
17-2
019
16C
entra
l Rad
ial R
oad
Wes
t Ext
ensi
on3.
063
New
6AP
BD
2021
-
17In
ner R
ind
Roa
d C
osta
l Sec
tion
- C
oast
Lin
e (L
osar
i Bea
ch to
Har
bor)
5.3
111
New
6AP
BD
2018
-202
0
- S
outh
Rin
g2.
553
New
6AP
BD
2021
-
18Jl
. Pet
tara
ni -
Jl.U
rip F
lyov
er (1
)48
New
4AP
BN
2007
-200
9
-
Jl. P
etta
rani
- Jl
.Urip
Fly
over
(2)
48In
terc
hang
eAP
BN
2018
-202
0
19Jl
.Urip
/ Jl
. Per
intis
Wid
enin
g (6
lane
s)16
.013
9W
iden
ing
6AP
BN
2007
-201
0
-
Jl.P
erin
tis-J
l.Day
a Jc
t. (w
iden
ing
to 8
lane
s)10
.046
Wid
enin
g8
APB
N20
16-2
018
20M
aros
-Pan
gkep
Roa
d W
iden
ing
( 4-la
nes)
20.0
100
Wid
enin
g4
APB
N20
07-2
008
Tota
l30
2.3
3,22
0
Sour
ce: J
ICA
Stu
dy T
eam
17
25
27 50
3546
34
1313
27
1416
16
134
133
135
155
5050
1417
3535
3535
158
1417
17
307
165
169
128
275
3339
39
1111
11
2727
00
13
2727
2727
77
77
1717
25
11
2424
12
19 1111
11
12
2007
-201
0
00
00
126
126
127
00
7758
00
0
0
58
3131
4645
3131
1033
3033
36
5050
5050
4444
8411
284
161
161
139
Wes
t Coa
st R
oad,
Tg.
Bung
a-Ta
kala
r (W
iden
ing
to 7
m)
Not
e: *
app
roxi
mat
e le
ngth
and
pub
lic in
vest
men
t con
stru
ctio
n co
st, *
* te
ntat
ive
sour
ces
303
117
160
139
299
217
181
2021
-202
320
11-2
015
2008
2009
2013
2019
2016
2016
-202
020
1420
2320
1520
2120
2220
2020
1720
18JI
CA
FS /
Pre-
FS R
oads
2012
2010
2007
2011
- Mid
dle
Sect
ion
(KIM
A A
cces
s-Jl
. Mal
ino)
- Jl.
Mal
ino-
Sou
th S
ectio
n (J
l.Tj.B
unga
)
Tran
s-Su
law
esi M
amm
inas
ata
Roa
d
- Pha
se 1
: M
-Rin
g an
d Ac
cess
(6 la
nes
& 4
lane
s),
Sect
ions
B a
nd C
- Jl.M
alin
o-M
. Byp
ass
Sect
ion
(Sou
th)
Mam
min
asa
Byp
ass
Oth
er R
oads
(con
stru
ctio
n)
Roa
d
- Mak
assa
r Se
ctio
n
- Mar
os/G
owa
Sect
ion
- Mar
os B
ypas
s S
ectio
n
- Mar
os-K
IMA
Acc
ess
- Pha
se 2
: M
aros
-Jl.I
r.Sut
ami I
C a
nd B
oka
IC -
Taka
lar,
(6
lane
s &
5 la
nes)
, Sec
tions
A a
nd D
Her
tasn
ing
Roa
d (S
ectio
ns C
+ D
)
0
Abd
ulla
h D
aeng
Siru
a R
oad
Out
er R
ing
Roa
d
- Jl.P
erin
tis-J
l.Mal
ino
- Jl.P
erin
tis-J
l.Sut
ami (
Priv
ate
Sec
tor)
- Mak
assa
r Se
ctio
n (O
n-go
ing)
810
8
Phas
e 1
Phas
e 2
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-4
Figure 10.1.3 Traffic Condition in Mamminasata Metropolitan Area With- and Without-Project Cases at Each Fiver-Year Period
LEG
EN
D
8-la
ne ro
ads
6-la
ne ro
ads
4-la
ne ro
ads
2-la
ne ro
ads
Not
e: A
fter i
mpr
ovem
ent i
nclu
ding
wid
enin
g
3). H
erta
snin
g R
oad
1).
Mam
min
asa
Byp
ass
(Mid
dle
Sect
ion)
6) Ir.Sut
ami R
oad
10).
Mal
ino R
oad
Wid
enin
g2).
Tra
ns-S
ulaw
esi M
am
min
asat
a R
oad
5).
Out
er
Rin
g R
oad
(N
orth
)5).
Oute
r R
ing
Roa
d15)
. New
Por
t A
ccess
Roa
d1)
. M
amm
inas
a B
ypas
s (M
aros
- G
owa)
, ( G
ow
a- T
akal
ar)
7) K
IMA
/Jl.I
r.Suta
mi A
cce
ss R
oad W
iden
ing
4).
Abd
ulla
h D
aeng
Sirua
Road
8). W
est
Coa
st R
oad
(Tg.
Bunga
- T
akal
ar)
9).
Wes
t C
oast
Roa
d W
ideni
ng (4-
lanes
)12
). C
ent
ral R
adia
l R
oad
11). M
amm
inas
a B
ypa
ss &
KIM
A C
onne
ctio
n18
).Jl.
Pet
tara
ni -
Jl.U
rip F
lyov
e19
). Jl.U
rip /
Jl.
Per
intis
Wid
enin
g6) Ir.S
uta
mi R
oad
(Tal
lo R
iver
Bridge
Wid
eni
ng &
Int
erc
hange
)14)
. Jl.I
r.Suta
mi -
Tam
bua
(N
orth
Coa
stal
Road
)17
). In
ner R
ind
Roa
d C
osta
l Sec
tion
(Los
ari B
each
to H
arbo
r)20
). M
aros
-Pan
gkep
Roa
d W
ideni
ng13)
. M
iddl
e R
ing
Tg.
Bung
a Ext
ensi
on
19)
. Jl.P
erin
tis-
Jl.D
aya
Jct. (w
iden
ing
to 8
lan
es)
Up
to Y
ear 2
010
Up
to Y
ear 2
015
Up
to Y
ear 2
020
Up
to Y
ear 2
023
175439376
317
249313
314 274
274
242
308
387 331
250
243
280
86
59
428
428212
187
308
195
143143
33
15
512546
992
597
719
719
24
8 3
3
444
448
226302
141
257
1 96
11
316
244 160
8038
1 570
601
138
385
516
12
64
2
6
0
2
27
242
185
482
6
36
1
18
19
0
106
0
103
0
56
056
3737
82
82
87
87
10
4
6
42
54
47
11
36
3
223
0
5610
6
3 93
158
29466
1
504
282
189
137
464471 461
523461548
215
111
460
193
346
201
690
386
356
159
604
1
227 24
5
78
354
244
286
960 297
768
402
633
217
217297
0273
0
1030
448
0
256
11233
138 5
186
0
231
135
147 0
152152
0
105
268
104
226
355
375
287
287
273
9025
044
3
194
1
234
176
0
217
6
16132169339 333
448
444
0
55
278
318
375
426 387
32
331
416
740508
39
1030
147
386
108
320
757 5
234
206265
265519
312
370
12
28 293
250
458
308340 331
291
0
0
517
251
251
250
604
111
177
288
311
111
604
117
136 285
136
136
589
324316
548 458
95
461
461
456
274
1
187456391
319
258297
294 449
395
256
352
414 358
264
243280
74
59
462
456304
266
266
181
129129
28
19
534575
1017
614
715
715
59
38
3
3
531
541
237290
141
257
196
117
338253181
7938
1 573
623
163
410
605
22
24
21
39
2
21
9
256
202
560
39
37
1
18
19
0
107
0
260
0
56
056
3737
62
62
102
102
16
4
7
45
54
44
8
36
3
225
0
5510
7
403
177
31763
2
534
287
192
140
477471 461
534494548
221
93
431
202
363
212
715
425
357
188
577
9
240 24
0
143
287
228
300
980 307
820
462
736
299
307
0296
0
1074
532
929
5
24
31
0
151
135
112 0
105105
62
94
120
395
315
301
301
296
9022
746
9
190
7
247
155
0
62
21
16146144 313 295
541
531
0
116315
315
470 414
43
358
471
828
569
42
1064
112
425
94
325
656 5
247
218275
275532
271
311
7
30 221
227
458
268317 321
319
0
0
529
291
291
254
624
122
178
300
343
122
624
157
148 272
148
148
616
332338
548 458
120
494
461
438
313
9
154519405
345
216272
305 348
307
204
287
344 297
217
202228
84
47
464
377239
208
208
141
102101
20
18
650537
1352
920
959
959
47
24
3
3
547
547
547354
104
208
159
99
413
326 141
5739
9 662
771
88
476
670
0
24
26
46
17
26
0
146
169
671
46
13
6
15
16
0
246
75
81
0
46
047
2727
45
45
83
83
12
4
6
43
45
33
2
31
3
334
0
5424
6
322
130
39054
9
608
374
263
261
614510 517
558402612
263
86
404
277
412
283
1047
402
206
177
572
64
303 28
2
81
205
202
998 265
573
414
651
257
265
7232
7
993
547
0
24
29
0
29
109
87 0
12971
45
83
275
244
244
232
9424
852
8
115
17
232
112
7
45
17
208
354
547
547
0
88 275
275
397 344
34
297
425
750626
41
977
87
402
73
266
5353
232
202
105 180
248
518
261342 321
293
0
0
573
213
1058
21
201
222
21
1058
129
173
464
383413
612 518 402
517
64
165411347
285
233272
236
358
318
207
291
347 300
217
199228
73
47
424
402237
205
205
140
100100
20
18
484458
849
498
572
572
48
25
3
3
421
421
196
227
104
207
1 58
98289
216 145
8636
9 562
596
129
301
572
0
17
11
25
1
11
0
165
168
534
25
28
1
15
16
0
960
208
0
46
047
2929
43
43
83
83
12
4
6
43
45
33
2
31
3
186
0
4496
362
147
25953
5
481
267
193
112
428447
415
491434498
198
78
405
167
297
161
570
387
307
173
532
0
232 20
3
98
269
225
263
917 268
716
399
660
275
268
0239
0
999
421
0
225
17
24
0
129
103
81 0
6565
43
36
105
330
278
246246
239
8624
941
1
141
1
206
151
0
43
15
1112998238 225
421
421
0
93 278
278
401 347
36
300
418
728
495
41
999
81
387
72
265
5252
206
197225
225431
225
278
6
15 176
249
412
264335 317
302
0
0
493
223
223
211
525
75
132
207
295
75
525
136
128 162
128
128
452
292289
498 412
105
434
415
366
251
0
142387322
313
353400
462 497
443
310 206 180
140
170
170130
101141
77
25
307
107107
56
56
44
2334
3
18
387258
605
310
349
349
51
32 16
16
400
297
293213
5712
2
9262
277
20860 10
1371
581
791
67
172
381
140
66
52
11541
52
4
67
109
649
115
96
71
8
10
30
244
9511
8
25
35
233
404064
64
104
104
33
55
24
32
30
48
28
21
16
191
30
53
83
77
244
260
8620
3192
419
195210
117
437455 425
611462775
212
47
177
168
288
139
209
125
439
292
166
197
617
224
221 23
2
120
66
292
16
142
1313
99
297
77
83
89 91
96
598
74
212 269
270
73
73
116
240277
775 598 462
425
224
158459366
321
312424
637 613
520
377
198186 12
7
142137182
110
34
471
188188
89
89
82
5257
17
26
536385
1063
720
747
747
99
68
7
7
408
408
408278
7616
2
1 22
79
336
302 136
1083
7560
2
812
82
276
641
0
70
49
83
31
49
0
88
156
583
83
98
92
13
13
14
216
25
178
78
40
640
4444
105
105
117
117
49
83
49
21
38
42
17
26
33
284
14
5321
6
282
166
33837
5
583
273
227
172
560552 512
634562967
260
161
424
237
350
164
802
451
182
233
734
290
301 28
0
178
187
150
187
187
81
6681
812
408
0
70
14
53
15025
105
76
186186
6623
989
89
96
81
105
31
162
278
408
408
78
156
260 186
90
127
280
216
19
734
451
31
174
143 2
66
150
97 122
47
728
238286 399
253
42
42
137
802
0
802
134
144
307
309336
967 728 562
512
290
131413334
301
195236
222 252
223
141
231282 24
4
196
182
182
81
34
400
300176
153
153
103
7473
12
16
512378
989
717
737
737
34
15
2
2
431
431
431278
7616
2
122
79
302
224
92 7038
5 630
743
79
267
628
0
17
12
28
8
12
0
97
132
600
28
8
1
13
13
0
195
52
60
0
40
040
00
31
3165
65
6
3
5
38
38
26
0
26
2
207
0
4519
5
294
105
26938
1
534
297
245
165
515450
428
463370548
197
58
361
232
339
169
736
338
99
164
438
16
240 21
1
60
194
159
915 219
500
327
551
213
219
3194
3
941
431
0
17
21
0
21
7866 0
9353
31
53
246
196
196
194
61
240
487
66
7
194
120
3
31
8
162
278
431
431
0
70
246
246
323 282
2924
4
373
624
509
36
926
66
338
50
230
383 8
194
159
90 142
240
487
235300 267
282
0
0
500
193
746
18
181
199
18
746
104
120
277
275302
548 487 370
428
16
128377323
278
281390
550 500
435
309
144
155 116
120
101141
80
25
328
104104
47
47
55
3336
6
15
393253
728
486
506
506
57
54
4
4
310
310
310
213
5712
2
92
268
212
77 9335
3 555
711
35
177
479
0
56
40
69
24
40
0
49
106
551
69
81
77
8
10
8
184
7
137
30
35
233
4040
73
73
98
98
39
59
31
19
30
32
12
21
13
179
8
4218
4
218
109
21825
6
435
210 202
110
428446
414
511490846
204
124
352
169
253
9553
4
296
146
190
634
231
215 20
9
137
125
96
125
125
615061
711
310
0
56
8
42
967
73
14
159159
5019
778
78
76
61
73
24
122
213
310
310
30
106
211 155
64
116
209
184
18
634
296
16
134
1014
50
96
84 91
42
649
179239 305
218
36
36
108
534
053
4
100
95
182
235268
846 649 490
414
231
93297264
233
301340
352 380
356
248 185 157
127
129
12999
77108
44
18
214
6868 37
37
28
1321
2
13
284176
483
259
287
287
32
24 11
11
305
230
230170
4190
6 747
217
15143 80
305 5
0561
8
46
163
292
98
50
31
7626
31
0
46
86
500
76
74
52
6
8
17
191
67
88
14
27
225
313129
29
64
64
22
24
3
26
23
32
17
15
11
114
17
42
59
51
191
186
7416
1153
311
160
200
87
320366 347
495449723
159
3815
910
620
3
93
169
7437
9
178
143
165
492
153
204 16
2
98
55
178
8
104
66
84
230
51
59
51 75
70
563 24181 20628
8
36
36
87
193217
723 563 449
347
153
With
out
Proj
ects
With
out
Proj
ects
With
out
Proj
ects
Year
200
6 AD
T &
Roa
d N
etw
ork
With
Pro
ject
sW
ith P
roje
cts
With
Pro
ject
sW
ith P
roje
cts
With
out
Proj
ects
1
1
2
2
2
20
14
117
6
5
5
18
15
17
19
3
4
6
10
12
139
8
2
5
1
1
2
5
Maro
s
Sung
gum
inas
a
Taka
lar
Maka
ssar
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-5
Figure 10.1.4 presents an estimate of public investments required for the on-going and new major road development projects in the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area in 2008-2023. An amount of Rp 190 billion will be required on an average.
Source: JICA Study Team
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Rp
(bill
ion)
Figure 10.1.4 Estimate of Public Investment (Construction Cost)
for Major Road Development for 2008-2023 Period
10.2 Implementation Plan for the F/S Roads
10.2.1 Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road
(1) Priority and Recommendation of Earliest Project Implementation
Among the F/S and other roads, the Trans-Sulawesi Road Mamminasata Section (the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road) was identified as the most viable on economic, technical and regional development aspects, and its earliest implementation was envisaged. The JICA Study Team completed the feasibility study for the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road and incorporated its implementation plan in the Interim Report submitted in June 2007. The JICA Study Team also assisted in preparing the Implementation Program and Project Digest for the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project (the TSMR Project).
(2) Implementation of Jl.Perintis Kemerdekaan 6-Lane Widening
The DGH has commenced the construction of a flyover and intersection for Jl.A.P.Pettarani (Jl.Tol Reformasi) - Jl.Urip Sumoharjo IC. The DGH also commenced the road widening from 4 lanes to 6 lanes for Jl.Perintis Kemerdekaan. The latter is a part of the Trans-Sulawesi Road Mamminasata section, and will be completed up to Jl.Ir.Sutami IC (new Airport Access Road IC) by 2010. As the commencement of the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project is scheduled to be in 2010, the TSMR Project does not include the DGH’s APBN section, except overpass pedestrian bridges required for safety of pedestrian crossings. Moreover, as the Jl.Perintis
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-6
Kemerdekaan / Jl.Ir.Sutami IC flyover at the new airport terminal access will be completed under the ongoing BOT scheme by 2009, this is also excluded from the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project.
(3) Expressway/Toll Road Scheme
The DGH has conducted an expressway/toll road study in 2006 for Sulawesi Island (Trans-Sulawesi Road). The study recommended that the Maros-Mandai-Makassar, Middle Ring Road (Makassar - Sungguminasa) and Sungguminasa - Takalar section of the Trans-Sulawesi road should be included as priority roads in the expressway/tollway development programs to be implemented in the period of 2006 - 2020. However, a joint investment by the Government and private sector (Public-Private Partnership) is required to attain the marginal FIIR of 16% (or 20%).
The express/toll roads in the DGH’s study followed the routes suggested in the Mamminasata Spatial Plan Study. The JICA Study Team changed the Trans-Sulawesi route from the Mamminasata Plan to the existing national road as described in Section 7.3. As a result, both the Maros - Mandai - Makassar and Sungguminasa (Boka IC) - Takalar sections are not recommended for toll road development but recommended for national road development (public investment).
The Study Team reviewed the toll road plan and PPP scheme for the Middle Ring Road (Makassar - Sungguminasa) as described in Section 7.3.3 on technical aspects and Section 9.3 on financial aspects, as one of the alternative implementation plans and recommended an ordinal public investment scheme with an external soft loan. The JICA Study Team also prepared a cost recovery plan required for operation and maintenance of the roads after their construction.
(4) Alternative Implementation Plans
The investment required for the Trans-Sulawesi Road Project was estimated at approximately Rp 1,651-1,757 billion in total including civil works, consultancy services, ROW acquisition, administration and tax (VAT). If Japanese ODA facility (JBIC Loan) is used, 100% of civil works and consultancy service costs can be covered by a soft loan. However, GOI needs to provide own finance for land acquisition, resettlement, administration and tax (VAT), which are not eligible for external loan. Land acquisition and resettlement costs for the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road were estimated at Rp 310 billion including inflation. The central and regional governments will share the cost, allocate budget and complete the land acquisition and resettlement in the years 2008 - 2010.
As allocation of sufficient budget for the land acquisition and resettlement in this short period seems to be difficult, the Study Team prepared alternative implementation schedules. Alternative A is implementation of the full length in one time and Alternative B is implementation in two phases. Phase 1 covers the Middle Ring Road and its south extension as these two sections are more urgently required in terms of traffic demand while less settlement is required. Phase 2 covers the Maros-Jl.Ir.Sutami IC and Sungguminasa (Boka IC) - Takalar sections. Table 10.1.1 shows
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-7
the concept of the alternative plans.
Table 10.2.1 Alternative Implementation Plans Alternative
Plans Concept Section Length Construction
Period Estimated
Construction Cost A Non-phased
Implementation Sections A, B, C and D
47.1 km 36 months (2010-2012)
Rp 1,651 billion
Phase 1: Sections B and C
16.0 km 36 months (2010-2012)
Rp 888 billion B Phased Implementation
Phase 2: Sections A and D
31.1 km 36 months (2013-2015)
Rp 869 billion
Approximately Rp 99 billion will be required from 2008 to 2010 for the land acquisition and resettlement in the case of Alternative A. Annual budget requirement could be reduced to approximately Rp 55 billion from 2008 to 2013. It seems that Alternative B is more practicable and, therefore, it is recommended to be selected.
Land Acquisition & Resettlement Expenditures
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Financial Year
Land
Aqu
isiti
on &
Res
ettle
men
t Exp
endi
ture
s (R
p B
illio
n)
Alternative AAlternative B (Phase 1 + Phase 2)
Alternative A : Full
Alternative B :Staged Implementation (Phase 1)
Alternative B :Staged Implementation(Phase 2)
Figure 10.2.1 Land Acquisition and Resettlement Expenditures for Alternative Implementation Plans
There are many houses to be moved for the existing road widening, along the project road, especially at Mandai in Kab.Maros (Section A) and Limbung in Kab.Gowa (Section D) and it needs considerable time for resettlement negotiations and arrangements. On the other hand, the ROW acquisition is in progress for the Middle Ring Road (Section B) and there are not so many houses to be moved for Section C. It is expected that land acquisition and resettlement for Sections
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-8
A and D can be carried out and completed during the construction of Sections B and C.
10.2.2 Mamminasa Bypass, Hertasning Road and Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
The following implementation plans are recommended for the Mamminasa Bypass, Hertasning Road and Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road in the F/S.
(1) Mamminasa Bypass
Four ring roads were planned for the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area namely the inner ring (Jl A.P.Pettarani/ Jl Tol Reformasi), middle ring, outer ring and outer-outer ring (Mamminasa Bypass). A general order of development requirement is from the inner ring to outside. According to the results of traffic survey and analysis, there would be no large through traffic on the Mamminasa Bypass from the south to the north bypassing Makassar City. However, as the anticipated role and function of the Mamminasa Bypass are to induce/promote the creation of a new satellite town at the foot of Mt. Moncongloe (approximately 15 km east of the Makassar City center), the middle part of the bypass road, which is an arterial road for the new town, should be constructed earlier than the northern and southern parts.
(2) Hertasning Road
The Hertasning Road (4-lane road) is under construction by the South Sulawesi Provincial Government. It is anticipated that the Provincial Government will continue the construction and complete this road by the end of 2010 using APBD I (provincial budget). After completion of the on-going sections (sections A-C), if budget availability is tight, staged implementation could be applied for Section D, 4.5 km long from the new campus of the State Islamic University to the intersection of the Kabupaten road. The 1st stage consists of widening the existing 4.5 m road to 7 m road, and the 2nd stage consists of further widening it to 4-lane road in the future.
(3) Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
A part of the Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road (Section B) is under construction by Makassar City (APBD II). This road will have two functions: One is to serve as a radial road for transportation of residents around this road within the Makassar City territory (up to the Tallo River). The other is to provide a direct access from the Makassar City center to a planned new satellite town at the foot of Mt. Moncongloe (approximately 15 km east of the Makassar City center) and KIWA.
10.3 Executing Agency
(1) Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road
The Tran-Sulawesi Road Project should be implemented as a strategic road development
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-9
contributing to the regional economy, both for Sulawesi and the eastern part of Indonesia. The status of the Middle Ring and its extension is expected to be changed to national road after their completion. The Directorate General of Highways (DGH) of the Ministry of Public Works will be the executing agency responsible for the construction and operation/maintenance of the Project. In the detailed design and construction stage, a Project Management Unit (PMU) will be established in Bina Marga. The PMU will represent DGH and act as the Employer of the Project.
The JICA Study Team suggests that user charges should be collected at the two new bridges, one at the Tallo River Bridge and the other at the Jeneberang River Bridge, to cover the operation and maintenance costs of the whole Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road. The operation and maintenance works can be contracted out to the private sector. The Balai Besar VI of Bina Marga will be responsible for controlling the operation and maintenance works to be carried out by the management and operation contractor.
(2) Mamminasa Bypass
The Mamminasata Bypass should be designated as a strategic provincial road since it is part of the secondary arterial road network system for the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area that connects the capital of Maros, Gowa and Takalar passing through a new satellite town. The Public Infrastructure Agency (Dinas Praswil) of South Sulawesi Province will be the executing agency responsible for the construction and maintenance of the Project. For the implementation, “Officers for Technical Activities Implementation” will be appointed and they will represent Dinas Praswil and act as the Employer of the Project.
Note: The Maros Town Section (Maros bypass) might be changed to national road after its completion. In this case, the executing agency will be DGH.
(3) Hertasning Road
Sections A, B and C) of the Hertasning Road were implemented by the Public Infrastructure Agency (Dinas Praswil) of South Sulawesi Province. Therefore, Section D of this road under the F/S will also be executed by the same agency.
(4) Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
The Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road will not have the status of provincial road as it is not a connecting road between the Provincial capital and Kabupaten/Kota capitals or between Kabupaten capitals. Therefore, the project within the territory of Kota Makassar should be implemented as a city road. Dinas PU of Kota Makassar should be the executing agency responsible for the construction and maintenance of the project within the Makassar City territory. As for the project road passing through the territories of Kabupaten Maros and Gowa, Dinas Praswil of South Sulawesi Province should be the executing agency as this road section should be designated as a strategic road for a new satellite town development.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-10
Note: As the Kabupaten Maros and Gowa section provides direct access to a planned new satellite town, it might be constructed by a private investor who is participating in the new satellite town development.
10.4 Contract Packaging
10.4.1 Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road
The project should be implemented with appropriate contract packages to be determined taking into consideration the size of contracts (amount and quantity), characteristics of the section, technical difficulty, construction period, funding source, and competition in bidding. Figure 10.3.1 shows the packaging and scope of work for alternative implementation plans A and B.
(1) Alternative A
The Study Team recommends to implement the project in four (4) packages if Alternative A of the above implementation plan is adopted.
Package 1 is the road section from the junction beside the office of Maros Regency Governor to Jl.Tol.Ir.Sutami IC (refer to Figure 10.4.1). The new Maros town and the divided 4-lane road completed in 2003-2004 shall not be disturbed. The construction works are to widen the existing 4-lane road to a divided 6-lane road.
Source: Drawn on Google Earth Map
End of Trans-SulawesiMamminasataRoad Project
The newtown sectionnot touched
MamminasaBypass
Office ofGovernor
Figure 10.4.1 End of Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road at Maros (Package 1)
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-11
The construction length is 8.7 km and no long bridges exist. The scope of works includes the pedestrian bridges on the Jl.Perintis Kemerdekaan (length 10.3 km) to be widened to 6 lanes under the national budget (APBN) by 2010.
Package 2 consists of the construction of a new 7.3 km long road from Jl.Perintis Kemerdekaan/Middle Ring Road intersection to Jl.Sultan Alauddin IC in Makassar City. The road will have 6 lanes and a wide median for keeping space for its future widening to 8 lanes. The Tallo River bridge (L=136 m) and a flyover on Jl.Sultan Alauddin are included in this section. Pile slabs will be used for the weak soil section located in the Tallo River basin, at the entrance to the Middle Ring Road from Jl.Perintis Kemerdekaan. The Middle Ring Road will cross Jl.Abdullah Daeng Sirua, Central Radial Road from Pannakukang, Jl.Borong Raya, Jl.Hertasning and some other minor roads.
Package 3 consists of the construction of the Middle Ring Access (new road) from the Jl.Sultan Alauddin IC to the intersection with the national road at Boka in Kabupaten Gowa. The section is 8.7 km long and includes a new Jeneberang River bridge (L=393 m). The road will have 4 lanes and a wide median for keeping space for its future widening to 6 lanes.
Package 4 consists of widening the existing 22.4 long road from Boka IC in Kabupaten Gowa to the center of Takalar town, from a 2-lane road to a divided 4-lane road. Widening will be made mostly on the west side as an irrigation canal runs along the east side of the existing road. No long bridges exist in this section.
(2) Alternative B
The Study Team recommends to implement the project in two packages in each phase as illustrated in Figure 10.4.2 if Alternative B of the above implementation plan is adopted. The outline of each package is the same as that described for Alternative A.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-12
Maros
Sungguminasa
P2-2
Jl.Per
intis
Middle Ring R
oad
Jeneberang River
Takalar
New Jeneberang RiverBridge (393m)
New Tallo RiverBridge (136m)
Boka IC
Tran
s-Su
law
esi M
amm
inas
ata
Roa
dPr
ojec
t (M
aros
- M
akas
sar)
, L=5
7.4k
m
P2-1
L=22.5km
L=8.6km
L=8.7km
L=7.3km
On-going 6-laneWidening by APBNL=10.3km
Jl.S.AlauddinInterchange(flyover)
P1-2
P1-1
LEGEND
Phase 2 Contracts
Phase 1 ContractsP1-1
P2-1
P1-2
P2-2
A
B
C
D
Tallo River
Maros River
Trans-SulawesiMamminasata Road
KIMA
Planned New Campus ofHasanuddin University(Engineering Department)
ExistingHasanuddinUniversity
Jl.Ir.S
utami
(Toll R
oad)
Jl.Urip-Jl.Tol.ReformasiFlyover underconstruction
Roadway PavementExisting Plan*
Maros -Jl.Ir.Sutami IC 8.7 4 6 Widening Concrete
PavementJl.Ir.Sutami IC-Middle Ring Road(Jl.Perintis)
- 4 6 (8)On-going
Widening byGOI (APBN)
ConcretePavement
Onlypedestrianbridges
B P1-1Middle Ring Road
7.3 - 6 (8) New Road ConcretePavement
Jl.SultanAlauddin IC
Tallo RiverBridge(136m)
C P1-2Middle Ring RoadAccess 8.6 - 4 (6) New Road AC
Pavement -JeneberangRiver Bridge(393m)
D P2-2 Boka IC -Takalar(national road) 22.5 2 4 Widening AC
Pavement -
Total: 47.1Note: the figure in ( ) shows a future plan.
SectionNo.
A
ContractPackage
No.
P2-1
Scope of Works RemarksLength(km)
Major RiverBridge (m)
FlyoverInterchange
Section NameNumber of Lanes
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 10.4.2 Implementation Plan B for Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-13
10.4.2 Mamminasa Bypass, Hertasning Road, A.D. Sirua Road
(1) Mamminasa Bypass
The Mamminasa Bypass was divided into four (4) sections as indicated in Table 10.4.1 taking the appropriate construction timing into consideration.
Table 10.4.1 Implementation Section of Mamminasa Bypass Section
No.* Section Name Road
Length Major Bridge
Length Construction
Period Estimated
Construction Cost 1-A Maros Bypass
Section 5.7 km Maros Bridge
(126m) 24 months (2016-2017)
Rp 88 billion
1-C Middle Section (KIMA Access - Jl Malino)
6.9 km 36 months (2013-2015)
Rp 280 billion
1-B Maros-KIMA Access
19.7 km Jeneberang Bridge (154m)
36 months (2021-2023)
Rp 90 billion
1-D Jl Malino - South Section (Jl Tj Bunga)
16.7 km 60 months 2019-2023
Rp 250 billion
Total 49.1 km 280m Rp 708 billion Note: Order of sections from the north (Matos) to the south Source: JICA Study Team
Of the above, it is assumed that an external soft loan would be applied for Section C, Middle Section (KIMA Access – Jl Malino), as this section should be constructed earlier than other sections according to the strategy of inducing the creation of a new satellite town along this road section. The construction should be carried out in one or two contract packages taking the estimated project cost and work characteristics into account.
(2) Hertasning Road
The JICA Study Team studied only Section D (4.9 km) of the Hertasning Road. Application of a single contract package would be appropriate for the construction of this road section..
(3) Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
Section B of the Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road is under construction and, therefore, Sections C and D within the territory of Makassar City should be implemented with appropriate contract packaging determined by Dinas PU. For the construction of Sections E and F in the territories of Kabupaten Maros and Gowa, it is recommended to use an external soft loan as these sections should be connected to the Mamminasa Bypass to induce the new satellite town. Considering the estimated project cost, application of one or two contract packages would be appropriate for the construction of these sections.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-14
Table 10.4.2 Implementation Section of Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road Section
No. Section Name Road
LengthLong Bridge
Length Construction
Period Estimated
Construction Cost 4-A,
4-C and 4-D
Makassar City Section
7.0km 48 months (2010-2013)
Rp 91 billion
4-E and 4-F
Kabupaten Maros & Gowa Section
8.3km Tallo Bridge (60m)
36 months (2013-2015)
Rp 124 billion
Total 15.3km Rp 315 billion Source: JICA Study Team
10.5 Implementation Schedule
10.5.1 Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road
(1) Pre-construction Schedule and Action Plan
As the feasibility study for the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project was completed by the end of June 2007, a series of procedures are required for financial arrangement for implementation of the project. It should also be noted that land acquisition and compensation are required for the project.
The JICA Study Team understands that joint financing by GOI and an external source (either Japanese ODA scheme or other donor agency) will be appropriate for implementation of the project. Figure 10.5.1 shows a draft schedule (implementation plan for phase 1 project) and action plan for the use of the Japanese ODA facility for earliest project implementation. Similar procedures will be required in the case of using other external funding. The phase 2 project also should be implemented in the same way as the phase 1.
The DGH needs to make internal project screening and submit the project proposal to Bappenas through MOW for Blue Book listing. As to the application for JBIC loan in the fiscal year 2008, a project proposal shall be submitted to Bappenas by the end of December 2007. Financial arrangements of GOI (APBN/ABPD) are also necessary for the cost not covered by the external loan like land acquisition, resettlement and administration costs.
AMDAL (EIA) for the project was approved by the Governor of South Sulawesi Province in September 2007. The LARAP policy frame required for project appraisal was also prepared by the JICA Study Team.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-15
Period 20061.2.3.4.5.6. 2009-20127. Maintenance
Feasibility Study Up to Jene 2007
Assist in EIA (AMDAL)Assist in LARAPFrameworkPreparation of ProjectDigest
Jun 2007
Assist in ImplementaionProgram Preparation
Jun 2007
Fact Findings Aug - Sep 2007Project Appraisal Oct-Nov 2007Pledge Feb 2008Exchnage of Notes Mar 2008Loan Agreement Mar 2008Project Monitoring
Bina Marga EIA (AMDAL) Up to Jun 2007
Bapedal-Da Public Consultation (TOR) (EIA) (LARAP Framwork)
Bapedal-Da Assessment and Approvalof AMDAL Up to Sep.2007
Bina Marga Implementation Program Up to Jun.2007
Bina Marga Screening and Proposal ofProject to Bappenas Nov 2007
MOF Request to GOJ Feb.2007Bina Marga Request for Blue Book Up to Dec.2007BinaMarga/MOF/Regional Goverment
Budget consultation /negotiation
BinaMarga/MOF/Regional Goverment
Budget allocation for landacquisition andresettlement
Dinas PU/ Kota/Kabupaten
Land acquisition /Resettlement
Note: * a case for use of Japanese ODA facilities (JBIC Loan) F/S Report for Trans Sulawesi Mamminasata Road (June 2007)
Indo
nesi
an S
ide
2010Item / Action
JBIC
*JI
CA
(JIC
A S
tudy
Team
)
Soft
Loan
Age
ncy*
Feasibility Study (Interim Report)2007 2008 2009
Construction
2013
Screeing and Financial (Loan) Procedures
Detailed Engineering DesignProcurement of Consultant
Bidding and Contract
2011 2012
Figure 10.5.1 Implementation Schedule and Action Plan for Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project (Case of Japanese ODA Facility)
A consultant will be employed in accordance with the guidelines of the financing agency and the executing agency for detailed engineering design, contractor procurement assistance and construction supervision.
Construction contractors will be procured through international competitive bidding in accordance with the guidelines of the loan agency. For the project of this type and scale, the selection will be made through separate pre-qualification and bidding among the pre-qualified contactors.
(2) Construction Stage
After the contract signing, the construction will be started. The construction period is estimated to be 30 - 36 months as shown in Figure 10.5.2. The required period for the roadway and bridge construction is estimated based on the work quantities in Section 9.1, daily productivity, number of work-units, and seasonal working days.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
● Package P2-1● Mobilization● Earthworks● Drainage works● Pavement● Bridge and other structures● Miscellaneous● Demobilization
● Package P1-1● Mobilization● Earthworks● Drainage works● Pavement● Bridge and other structures
(Tallo river bridge, flyover)● Miscellaneous● Demobilization
● Package P1-2● Mobilization● Earthworks● Drainage works● Pavement● Bridge and other structures
(Jeneberang river bridge)● Miscellaneous● Demobilization
● Package P2-2● Mobilization● Earthworks● Drainage works● Pavement● Bridge and other structures● Miscellaneous● Demobilization
Notes: Continuous Activities Discontinue Activities
Calendar MonthPackage No. / Works
Figure 10.5.2 Construction Schedule by Contract Package for Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road
(3) Post-construction Stage
Maintenance of the works and structures throughout the construction period and maintenance period is the responsibility of the contractors. After that, the project road will be maintained by DGH. If operation and maintenance works are contracted out, they are under the responsibility of contractors. The project execution will be continually monitored by the executing agency.
10.5.2 Mamminasa Bypass, Hertasning Road, A.D. Sirua Road
The implementation schedule of the Mamminasa Bypass, Hertasning Road and Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road would differ by financing source and availability. The anticipated or assumed source and plans are as shown in Figure 10.5.3.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-17
Length* Financial Period(km) Source* 2006
●
- 5.0 APBN 2016-2017
- 7.6 APBN/APBD I
2021-2023
- 19.4 ExternalLoan orPrivateInvestor
2013-2015
- 16.7 APBN/APBD I
2019-2023
●
- 3.4 APBD I Up to 2008
- 4.9 APBD I 2008-2010
●
- 2.5 APBD II Up to 2009
- 7.4 APBD II 2010-2011
- 7.2 ExternalLoan orPrivateInvestor
2012-2015
Source: JICA Study Team
2021-202320232015 2021 202220202017 2018
2011-20152008 2009 2013 20192016
2016-20202014201220102007 2011
Mamminasa Bypass
Road 2006-2010
Makassar Section(Sections A, C, D)
Middle Section (KIMAAccess-Jl. Malino)
Jl. Malino- South Section(Jl.Tj.Bunga)
Maros-KIMA Access
Secions C
Secions D
Makassar Section(Section B)
Maros/Gowa Section(Section E and F)
Maros Bypass Section
Hertasning Road
Abdullah Daeng SiruaRoad
Figure 10.5.3 Construction Schedule of Mamminasa Bypass, Hertasning Road and Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
10.6 Operation and Maintenance Plan
10.6.1 Key Maintenance Issues and Financing Sources
Sustainability of the road facilities after development is the most important issue. The asset management approach should be applied. Asset management can be defined as “comprehensive and structured approach to the long term management of assets as tools for the efficient and effective delivery of community benefits”2; or “systematic process of effectively maintaining, upgrading and operating assets, combining engineering principles with sound business practice and economic rationale, and providing the tools to facilitate a more organized and flexible approach to making decisions necessary to achieve the public’s expectations”3.
The road maintenance work consists of routine maintenance and periodic maintenance. Management, planning and execution of the maintenance work for national roads are under the responsibility of Balai Besar VI of DGH. Routine maintenance is conducted by force account of provincial or regency governments using APBN allocated by DGH. Periodic maintenance is contracted out. Planning and execution of the maintenance work for provincial roads is under the responsibility of Praswil of South Sulawesi Province using APBD I, while for city or Kabupaten roads they are under the responsibility of Dinas PU of city or regency governments using APBD II (refer to Section 3.2.4).
2 Austroads 1997 for improving asset management practice 3 OECD
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-18
The key issue for maintenance is the lack of financial and budgetary sustainability and/or insufficient budget allocation. A stable funding source should be established for maintenance financing. There are two approaches: budget approach and road fund approach. In the first approach, the road costs are considered as public expenditures to be covered by national or provincial budget. The revenue from fuel taxes, vehicle registration fees and others levies is used to cover such road costs. In the second approach, road users pay for the road costs. The former is the current practice in Indonesia and the establishment of road fund is one of the future challenges.
The road fund is an instrument that generally becomes the main financing source for road maintenance and other road expenditures. This approach has been used in the USA, Japan, New Zealand since the mid 1950s. Road users pay charges mainly in the form of gasoline levy. This is the most economical and efficient collection method as the charges can be collected at oil refineries or at ports of import. The road fund is free from budget fluctuation as it is generally managed and distributed by an independent board. In recent years, the road fund approach has been applied in many developing countries (more than 30 countries), including Ethiopia, Ghana, Benin, Kenya, Uganda, Honduras, Laos, etc. The first target is to collect the fund sufficiently to cover the road maintenance cost. Several countries have succeeded in collecting 90% of the required fund for maintenance at present. Some of the road fund could be used for securing road safety, overload control and other road asset management activities
A study was made in Indonesia on appropriateness of establishing a road fund with the World Bank’s financial cooperation. However, as its application has not yet started, it is necessary to strengthen the current approach for a while to secure the maintenance cost.
10.6.2 Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road
The operation and maintenance cost required for the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road is estimated to be Rp 9,000 million per annum for routine maintenance as detailed in Section 9.1. Periodic maintenance is also required at a certain interval. In order to secure sustainability of the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road after construction, a funding mechanism to finance operation and maintenance cost should be instituted. There will be three methods: the operation and maintenance by force account of DGH; by contractors under supervision of DGH (Balai Besar VI); and by participation of the private sector. The former two involve public financing and the last one involves financing by the private sector.
It is recommended that the following mechanism with the private sector participation be contemplated.
i) A public service agency (Badan Layanan Umum: BLU4) will be established to provide independently the operation and maintenance services for the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road.
4 Law No.1/2004 concerning government accounting, Government Regulation No.23/2005 concerning governance of BLU
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-19
ii) Two toll gates will be constructed at the Tallo River Bridge and the Jeneberang River Bridge as illustrated in Figure 10.6.1. There will be no access control for the Middle Ring Road but the users of this section will be tolled to finance the operation and maintenance of the entire section of the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road from Maros to Takalar.
iii) BLU will conduct a tender to select a private company who provides actual operation and maintenance services for the road on a contractual basis. Payment for the services of the company will be made on the performance basis and the cost will be financed using the toll revenue and public budget, if necessary.
Maros
Sungguminasa
B
Jl.Ir.Sutami
Jl.SultanAlauddin
C
D
A
Jl.Per
intis
Middle Ring R
oad
Jeneberang River
Takalar
New JeneberangRiver Bridge (393m)
New Tallo RiverBridge (136m)
Boka IC
A TS Mamminasata Road Project:Section No.
Tra
ns-
Sula
wesi
Mam
min
asat
a R
oad
Pro
ject
(Mar
os
- M
akas
sar)
Toll Gates
Toll Gates
Figure 10.6.1 Location of Toll Gates for O&M Cost Recovery
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-20
10.6.3 Mamminasa Bypass, Hertasning Road and Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
The road maintenance work for the Mamminasa Bypass, Hertasning Road, Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road consists of routine maintenance and periodic maintenance. Management, planning and execution of the maintenance work for these roads are under the responsibility of Praswil of South Sulawesi Province using APBD I or Dinas PU of Makassar City using APBD II, except part of the national road. Therefore, those regional governments are required to allocate appropriate budgets for road maintenance.
As the central section of the Mamminasa Bypass and the Maros/Gowa section of Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road are for the service of a new satellite town, the maintenance obligation might be transferred to the private investors who participate in the new town development.
10.7 Financing Plan and Annual Fund Requirements
10.7.1 Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project
(1) Financing Methods
Figure 10.7.1 summarizes the general financing methods studied for the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project.
Note: Excluding VAT and Administration costSource: JICA Study Team
Construction Operation and Maintenance
External Soft Loan(100%)
GovernmentInvestment
Land Acquisition
Civil Works
ConsultancyServices
GOI (APBN / APBD)
GOI (APBN /APBD) Land Acquisition
External Soft Loan(GOI Portion) Civil Works
ConsultancyServices
Civil Works
GOI (APBN / APBD)
Private SectorInvestment
ConsultancyServices
Expressway / Toll Road
Arterial Road(National)
Public PrivatePartnership
(PPP)
GOI (APBN)
Private Sector(Road User Charge)
Private Sector(Road User Charge)
Road use fee is collectedat toll gates
Figure 10.7.1 Financing Methods for Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-21
There will be two financing methods for implementation of the project. One is financing by the public sector and the other is co-financing with the private sector (Public-Private Partnership). In both methods it is possible to use a soft loan facility either from Japan or other sources. A Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) scheme will not be applicable as the Project’s FIRR is too low. Operation and maintenance can be financed by the public (ABBN) or covered by user charges as one of the sustainable maintenance methods.
(2) PPP System in Road Sector
1) Historical Outline of Toll Road Development
The first toll road built in Indonesia was the “Jagorawi Toll Road” with a length of 46 km linking Jakarta to the outer suburbs of Bogor and Ciawi in March 1978. The Government funded it through offshore loans and the issuance of Indonesia Highway Corporation (Jasa Marga) bonds. Having been founded to operate the toll road on March 1st, 1978 based on the Government Regulation No. 4 of 1978, later based on Presidential Decree No. 38 of 1981, PT Jasa Marga (Persero) was appointed to operate nine toll roads/bridges in Indonesia. At the end of the 1980s, the Government invited the private sector to take part in the development of the toll road network through Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) schemes. As of the beginning of 2006, 649 km of toll roads have been in operation in Indonesia, of which 165 km are managed by private operators.
In general, toll roads form part of the road infrastructure network. They are deemed to be implemented in a self-sufficient context without straining the Government’s budget. In order to give further strength to that investment concept, the regulatory status of toll roads was alerted by the Road Law No. 38/2004. The Government tends to finance future toll roads through both approaches of fully private funds and Public-Private Partnership (PPP) programs. In order to attract the private sector, there are steps that are done or being considered by the Government:
* Strengthening the institutional and regulatory framework for toll roads * Establishing the Indonesian Toll Road Authority (BPJT) which will be responsible for
investment regulations on toll roads to replace Jasa Marga regulatory role * Formulating appropriate structure for the automatic adjustment of toll rates * Applying transparent and competitive process * Addressing issues on land acquisition and rights * Establishing clear and sound policies to determine the proper conditions under which
government support should be extended * Formulating a road master plan including toll road master plan
2) Regulatory Framework
Article 43(2) of the Road Law No. 38/2004 determines the new policy of the Government regarding the development of toll roads, and Article 19-23 of the Government Regulation No. 15/2005 on toll roads stipulates that for the toll road sections that indicate positive economic
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-22
viability but not financially viable, the Government will finance or construct the respective toll roads. After constructing the toll road, the Government will conduct contract management for the operation and maintenance of the facility. For toll road sections with indications of positive economic viability but marginal financial viability, they can be implemented by the Government and an enterprise in which finance and construction can be conducted through a partnership scheme. For toll roads having good economic and financial viability, they will be offered through open and transparent investment tender process. The Road Law No. 38/2004 encompasses the following regulations: Indonesian Toll Road Authority (BPJT)
* Indonesian Toll Road Authority (BPJT) established by, and is responsible to the Minister of Public Works.
* The Authority includes participants from the Government, stakeholders and the public.
* BPJT’s basic responsibilities encompass the implementation of regulations and the supervision of toll road operators in accordance with the policies and regulations specified in Law No. 38 of 2004 and Government Regulation No. 15 of 2005.
* Major tasks to be carried out by the Government/BPJT include: project preparation, invitation to pre-qualification (PQ) and bidding, pre-bid conference, evaluation of bids, appointment of successful bidder, contract signing and contract implementation.
Toll Rates
* Initial toll rates and subsequent toll rate adjustments are proposed by the investor through BPJT and approved by the Minister of Public Works.
* The rates are calculated by taking into consideration the willingness-to-pay of toll road users, savings in vehicle operating cost and the feasibility of the investment.
* Tariffs are regulated under a toll road authorization agreement; however, their application is subject to the official announcement of the toll road operator.
* Tariffs are subject to be reviewed and adjusted every two years with a coefficient based on the inflation rate.
Land Acquisition
* The Government is responsible for the acquisition of land through the Ministry of Public Works.
* Land Acquisition is funded either by the Government, State Owned Company or the private sector.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-23
* The budget for land acquisition is determined by the Government.
* The toll road and the land on which it is built are the property of the Government.
* In case of land acquisition funds emanating from private parties, if the cost exceeds the approved budget, the shortfall will be compensated by an adjustment of the concession or through other acceptable methods.
To cope with the problem of land speculation that has caused project-cost inflation and uncertainty, it is expected that the Government will issue a regulation banning the use of land designated for turnpike projects for other purposes. With this regulation, land that has been earmarked for turnpike projects cannot be sold except to the local government at a price that is slightly higher than the market value. This will be a part of the Government’s efforts to encourage investors to participate in future toll road projects and to reduce the length of the land acquisition process.
3) Issues
PPP projects in the road sector are being offered to the private sector through KKPPI (Komite Kebijakan Percepatan Penyediaan Infrastruktur: The National Committee for the Acceleration of Infrastructure Provision). As described in the last section, a PPP project is offered when the project has a marginal financial viability. As of now only two PPP projects in the road sector have been under the tender process, which are the Solo - Kertosono Toll Road and Medan - Kualanamu Toll Road. The criteria for selecting a winning bidder is the least viability gap funding provided by the Government.
There are following issues in the current PPP system in the road sector:
i. When traffic demand is marginal, although the viability gap is filled by the Government in the initial construction cost, there is always a tendency for the private sector to become cautious in taking such risk, thus hinders its participation.
ii. There may be a risk for the Government to end up providing a large subsidy in the form of viability gap funding to a PPP concessionaire on the basis of its request for the viability gap funding.
iii. On the other hand, there is also an inherent risk that competition in tender tends to drive the private sector to overestimate future traffic demand so as to minimize the viability gap funding in order to come up with competitive pricing for the financial proposal. However, this overestimation of the future traffic demand may negatively affect the sustainability of the Project in the future.
iv. There is no adjustment mechanism for the profit which the private sector will make in the future, therefore the Government may always face the criticism that it gives away excessive profit to the private sector when the traffic demand grows beyond the original forecast level.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-24
v. It is difficult for the line ministry to estimate the amount of viability gap funding with a great degree of certainty, therefore there may always be a risk involved for the line ministry in budgeting such viability gap funding with the Ministry of Finance.
4) Application for the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project
Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is one of the methods for financing the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project. However, financial viability (FIRR) analyzed in Section 9.3 was very low and together with the issues raised in the preceding section and Section 7.3.3, it is not recommended to apply Public-Private Partnership (PPP).
(3) Financing Plan
Table 10.7.1 and Figure 10.7.2 indicate the financing plan for the project in the case of amplification of Japanese ODA facility (JBIC soft loan) by alternative implementation plan with assumptions that:
* 100% of the costs of civil works, consulting services and contingencies are financed by an external soft loan
* GOI finances the land acquisition/resettlement, administration cost and tax (VAT), which are not eligible for the JBIC loan
* The assumed currency exchange rate is US$ 1.00=¥120=Rp.9,322 (as of May 2007).
The project cost is estimated at Rp 1,651 billion for Alternative A including VAT and inflation. The total project cost for Alternative B is estimated at Rp 1,757 billion (Rp 888 billion for Phase 1 and Rp 869 billion for Phase 2). The loan amount for the project, which is the total of the civil works, consulting services and contingencies, is estimated to be US$ 132.3 million, 72.7 million and 67.7 million by alternative plan, respectively. The rest of the project cost, namely the land acquisition cost, administration cost and tax cost, estimated to be Rp 448 billion, Rp 227 billion and Rp 254 billion respectively, is needed to be financed by the local budget (APBN and APBD). The loan can cover 71% - 75% of the project cost.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-25
Table 10.7.1 Project Cost and Loan Amount by Alternative Implementation Plan
Phase 1 Phase 2 Total
External Soft Loan (US $ million) - Civil Works 112.7 61.9 57.6 119.5 61.9 - Consulting Services 8.4 4.6 4.3 8.9 5.7 - Contingencies 11.3 6.2 5.8 11.9 6.2
Total 132.3 72.7 67.7 140.4 73.8GOI APBN / APBD (Rp billion) - Land Acquisition 309.6 151.2 183.9 335.1 151.2 - Administration Cost 16.8 9.2 7.6 16.8 9.2 - Tax (VAT) 121.7 66.8 62.2 129.0 67.8
Total 448.1 227.2 253.7 480.9 228.2Grand Total (Rp billion) 1,651.2 888.0 868.9 1,756.9 899.0Note: * The detailed design for Phase 2 will be carried out during the Phase 1 work.Source: JICA Study Team
Alternative AActual
Implementaionfor Phase 1*
Alternative B
For the earliest start of the land acquisition for the Phase 2 project, the detailed design for the Phase 1 and Phase 2 should be carried out at the same time.
Source: JICA Study Team
External Soft Loan(100%)
Civil Works
ConsultancyServices
Land Acquisition& Resettlement
GOI (APBN / APBD) AdministrationCost
Tax (VAT)
Loan Amount
61.9 57.6
8.4
4.64.3
11.3
6.25.8
112.7
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
Alt.A Alt.B (Phase 1) Alt.B (Phase 2)
US
$ (m
illio
n)
Contingencies
Consulting Services
Civil Works
APBN/APBD
309.6
151.2183.9
16.8
9.27.6
121.7
66.862.2
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
Alt.A Alt.B (Phase 1) Alt.B (Phase 2)
RP
(bi
llion)
Tax (VAT)
Administration Cost
Land Acquisition
Figure 10.7.2 Financing Plan for Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project
(4) Annual Fund Requirements
The financing plan is further broken down by annual fund requirements based on the implementation schedule as indicated in Tables 10.7.2, 10.7.3 and 10.7.4 for the implementation plan Alternative A, Alternative B (Phase 1) and Alternative B (Phase 2), respectively. In the
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-26
schedule, the foreign currency component is assumed to be 50% of the civil works and consultancy service costs and the rest is the local currency component. Price escalation is assumed to be 2% and 6% per year for the foreign and local components, respectively.
Note: The detailed design for Phase 1 and Phase 2 should be carried out at the same time in order to commence the ROW acquisition (see the table below) for Phase 2 as soon as possible.
Table 10.7.2 Disbursement Schedule for Implementation Plan Alternative A
Category Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013(I) Foreign Currency Portion (Mil US$)
Civil Works (Base Cost) 46.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.17 16.17 13.86 0.00Price Escalation 2.0% 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.33 1.68 1.75 0.00Physical Contingency 10.0% 5.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75 1.78 1.56 0.00
Sub-Total 56.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.25 19.63 17.17 0.00Consulting Services (Base Cost) 3.23 0.00 0.00 1.29 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.00Price Escalation 2.0% 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.00Physical Contingency 10.0% 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.00
Sub-Total 3.87 0.00 0.00 1.51 0.77 0.79 0.80 0.00Total 59.92 0.00 0.00 1.51 20.02 20.42 17.97 0.00
(II) Local Currency Portion (Bil Rp.)Civil Works (Base Cost) 419.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 146.97 146.97 125.98 0.00Price Escalation 6.0% 141.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 38.58 49.71 52.72 0.00Physical Contingency 10.0% 56.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.55 19.67 17.87 0.00
Sub-Total 617.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 204.10 216.35 196.57 0.00Consulting Services (Base Cost) 29.40 0.00 0.00 11.76 5.88 5.88 5.88 0.00Price Escalation 6.0% 8.24 0.00 0.00 2.25 1.54 1.99 2.46 0.00Physical Contingency 10.0% 3.76 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.74 0.79 0.83 0.00
Sub-Total 41.40 0.00 0.00 15.40 8.16 8.65 9.17 0.00Land Acquisition and Resettlement 260.34 13.02 78.10 78.10 91.12 0.00 0.00 0.00Price Escalation 6.0% 49.27 0.78 9.65 14.92 23.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 309.61 13.80 87.76 93.02 115.04 0.00 0.00 0.00Administration Cost 16.80 0.00 0.00 4.20 4.20 4.20 4.20 0.00
Total 984.83 13.80 87.76 112.63 331.50 229.20 209.94 0.00(III) VAT Tax Portion (Bil Rp.)
Civil Works (Base Cost) 85.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.77 29.77 25.52 0.00Price Escalation 18.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.10 6.54 6.90 0.00Physical Contingency 10.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.49 3.63 3.24 0.00
Sub-Total 113.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 38.35 39.94 35.66 0.00Consulting Services (Base Cost) 5.95 0.00 0.00 2.38 1.19 1.19 1.19 0.00Price Escalation 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.20 0.26 0.32 0.00Physical Contingency 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.00
Sub-Total 7.74 0.00 0.00 2.95 1.53 1.60 1.66 0.00Total 121.70 0.00 0.00 2.95 39.89 41.54 37.32 0.00
(IV) Total Project Cost (Bil Rp.)1,665.07 13.80 87.76 129.65 558.01 461.09 414.76 0.00
Eligible Portion (Loan Amount) 1,216.96 0.00 0.00 29.48 398.89 415.36 373.23 0.0073.1%
Note: Currency Exchange Rates US$ 1.00= Rp. 9,322 = 120 J.YenRp 1.00= US$ 0.00011 = 0.013 J.Yen
Source: JICA Study Team
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-27
Table 10.7.3 Disbursement Schedule for Implementation Plan Alternative B (Phase 1) Category Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
(I) Foreign Currency Portion (Mil US$)Civil Works (Base Cost) 25.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.88 8.88 7.61 0.00 0.00 0.00Price Escalation 2.0% 2.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.92 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00Physical Contingency 10.0% 2.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.98 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 30.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.57 10.78 9.43 0.00 0.00 0.00Consulting Services (Base Cost) 1.78 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00Price Escalation 2.0% 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00Physical Contingency 10.0% 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00Total 32.91 0.00 0.00 0.83 10.99 11.21 9.87 0.00 0.00 0.00
(II) Local Currency Portion (Bil Rp.)Civil Works (Base Cost) 230.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.71 80.71 69.18 0.00 0.00 0.00Price Escalation 6.0% 77.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.19 27.30 28.95 0.00 0.00 0.00Physical Contingency 10.0% 30.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.19 10.80 9.81 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 338.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 112.09 118.81 107.95 0.00 0.00 0.00Consulting Services (Base Cost) 16.15 0.00 0.00 6.46 3.23 3.23 3.23 0.00 0.00 0.00Price Escalation 6.0% 4.52 0.00 0.00 1.23 0.85 1.09 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.00Physical Contingency 10.0% 2.07 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.41 0.43 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 22.74 0.00 0.00 8.46 4.48 4.75 5.04 0.00 0.00 0.00Land Acquisition and Resettlement 127.13 6.36 38.14 38.14 44.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Price Escalation 6.0% 24.06 0.38 4.71 7.29 11.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 151.19 6.74 42.85 45.42 56.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Administration Cost 9.22 0.00 0.00 2.31 2.31 2.31 2.31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 522.00 6.74 42.85 56.19 175.05 125.87 115.29 0.00 0.00 0.00(III) VAT Tax Portion (Bil Rp.)
Civil Works (Base Cost) 46.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.35 16.35 14.01 0.00 0.00 0.00Price Escalation 10.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.80 3.59 3.79 0.00 0.00 0.00Physical Contingency 5.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.91 1.99 1.78 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 62.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.06 21.93 19.58 0.00 0.00 0.00Consulting Services (Base Cost) 3.27 0.00 0.00 1.31 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00Price Escalation 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.11 0.14 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00Physical Contingency 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 4.25 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.84 0.88 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00Total 66.83 0.00 0.00 1.62 21.91 22.81 20.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
(IV) Total Project Cost (Bil Rp.)895.57 6.74 42.85 65.54 299.45 253.22 227.77 0.00 0.00 0.00
Eligible Portion (Loan Amount) 668.33 0.00 0.00 16.19 219.06 228.11 204.97 0.00 0.00 0.0074.6%
Note: Currency Exchange Rates US$ 1.00= Rp. 9,322 = 120 J.YenRp 1.00= US$ 0.00011 = 0.013 J.Yen
Source: JICA Study Team
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-28
Table 10.7.4 Disbursement Schedule for Implementation Plan Alternative B (Phase 2) Category Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
(I) Foreign Currency Portion (Mil US$)Civil Works (Base Cost) 20.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.93 6.93 6.96Price Escalation 2.0% 3.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.03 1.19 1.36Physical Contingency 10.0% 2.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.81 0.83
Sub-Total 26.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.76 8.94 9.14Consulting Services (Base Cost) 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.47 0.29 0.29 0.29Price Escalation 2.0% 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.06Physical Contingency 10.0% 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.03
Sub-Total 1.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.58 0.37 0.38 0.38Total 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.58 9.13 9.31 9.53
(II) Local Currency Portion (Bil Rp.)Civil Works (Base Cost) 189.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.04 63.04 63.23Price Escalation 6.0% 112.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.75 37.44 43.59Physical Contingency 10.0% 30.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.48 10.05 10.68
Sub-Total 332.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 104.27 110.52 117.50Consulting Services (Base Cost) 13.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 4.24 2.65 2.65 2.65Price Escalation 6.0% 6.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 1.77 1.33 1.57 1.83Physical Contingency 10.0% 2.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.60 0.40 0.42 0.45
Sub-Total 22.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.56 6.62 4.38 4.65 4.92Land Acquisition and Resettlement 133.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.30 33.30 33.30 33.30 0.00 0.00Price Escalation 6.0% 50.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.74 11.26 13.94 16.77 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 183.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.04 44.57 47.24 50.07 0.00 0.00Administration Cost 7.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 1.68 1.68 1.68 1.68
Total 545.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.04 46.97 55.54 160.40 116.85 124.11(III) VAT Tax Portion (Bil Rp.)
Civil Works (Base Cost) 38.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.77 12.77 12.81Price Escalation 14.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.14 4.85 5.62Physical Contingency 5.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.76 1.84
Sub-Total 58.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.59 19.38 20.27Consulting Services (Base Cost) 2.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.86 0.54 0.54 0.54Price Escalation 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.23 0.17 0.20 0.24Physical Contingency 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.08
Sub-Total 3.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 1.20 0.78 0.81 0.85Total 62.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 1.20 19.38 20.20 21.12
(IV) Total Project Cost (Bil Rp.)875.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.04 48.58 62.12 264.89 223.86 234.04
Eligible Portion (Loan Amount) 621.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.88 12.00 193.76 201.98 211.2371.0%
Note: Currency Exchange Rates US$ 1.00= Rp. 9,322 = 120 J.YenRp 1.00= US$ 0.00011 = 0.013 J.Yen
Source: JICA Study Team
10.7.2 Mamminasa Bypass Project, Hertasning Road Project and Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road Project
(1) Financing Methods
1) Mamminasa Bypass and Hertasning Road
Figure 10.7.3 summarizes the general financing methods studied for the Mamminasa Bypass and Hertasning Road Projects (provincial road).
Note: As the Maros bypass section could be changed to a national road after construction, its financial method would be similar to that of the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project.
Since both the Mamminasata Bypass and the Hertasning Road will be developed as provincial roads, the construction and consultancy services will be financed by APBD I (the provincial budget) and possibly by APBN as these are arterial road links in the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area. External soft loan may be used for the development of the Mamminasa Bypass Project possibly covering a substantial part on a granting basis from the central government. Maintenance will be financed by APBD I since the roads are provincial roads, but there may be a possible option in the future that the maintenance of the roads may be financed through the Road Fund which will be established for the maintenance of public roads throughout the country.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-29
Source: JICA Study Team
MaintenanceConstruction
APBN/APBD I
Land Acquisition
Civil Works
ConsultancyServices
APBD I / APBD II Road Fund (in future)
APBD I
Figure 10.7.3 General Financing Method for Mamminasa Bypass and Hertasning Road Projects
As the middle part of the Mamminasa Bypass is an arterial road planned for a new satellite town, it might be possible to be constructed by a private investor who will participate in the new satellite town development.
2) Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
Figure 10.7.4 summarizes the general financing methods studied for the Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road Project.
Since the Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road will not be categorized as a provincial road, the Makkassar portion of the road will be developed by the Makassar City using its own APBD II (Kota Budget) and possibly with the support of APBN and APBD I. The road section in Kabupaten Maros and Kabupaten Gowa is recommended to be developed as a strategic road of South Sulawesi Province as this is a direct access to the new satellite town, by financing from APBD I and support from APBN. As for the maintenance, APBD I will be used and at the same time the Road Fund may also be used in the same manner as planned for the Mamminasa Bypass and Hertasning Road Projects in future.
Source: JICA Study Team
MaintenanceConstruction
APBN / APBD I/ APBD II
Land Acquisition
Civil Works
ConsultancyServices
APBD I / APBD II Road Fund (in future)
APBD I / APBD II
Figure 10.7.4 General Financing Method for Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road Project
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-30
As the Kabupaten Gowa/Maros section is an arterial road directly accessing to a satellite town, it might be possible to be constructed by a private investor who participates in the new satellite town development.
(2) Potential Funding Sources for the Development of Regional Roads
There are following potential funding sources which could be utilized for the development of regional roads:
1) Funding from the Line Ministry (APBN): The national budget of Bina Marga for the road sector (APBN) is allocated mainly for the development of national roads, but sometimes it is allocated for the development of provincial roads.
2) External Loan/Grant via the same route as above (APBN): The Ministry of Finance has already prepared the decrees on both cases of granting external loan from GOI to regional governments (PMK 52 /2006: Peraturan Menteri Keuangan, Nomor 52/PMK 010 /2006) and lending external loan (PMK 53 /2006). However, due to the limited financial capacity of the regional governments, only the external loan granting practice has been adopted so far. External loan granting may be extended to both provincial and Kabupaten/Kota governments. The ERITP II project is implemented on the granting basis with 30% - 90% of the project cost being provided by the central government.
3) DAK (Special Allocation Fund: APBD): DAK is one category of balancing fund from GOI to regional governments. DAK has been allocated to cover the road sector expenditures of Kabupaten/Kota governments in the last two years based on the proposal from these governments. However, DAK allocated to the road sector should be used in accordance with PU’s instruction (Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor: 39 /PRT/M/2006), that is 70% for the maintenance and 30% for the improvement/construction.
4) General Regional Budget (APBD I: Province and APBD II: Kabupaten/Kota): The General Regional Budget (APBD I and APBD II) is, although limited, the major funding source for both the development/improvement and maintenance of regional roads. APBD I and APDB II are financed by own regional tax/levy revenue and the balancing fund from GOI such as the Revenue Sharing, the General Allocation Fund (DAU) and the Special Allocation Fund (DAK).
5) Mamminasata Metropolitan Area: Strategic and priority infrastructures in the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area might be financed by the national budget in future.
(3) Financing Methods for the F/S Roads except the TSMR Project
Figure 10.7.5 shows the optional financing methods applicable for the Mamminasa Bypass, Hertasning Road and Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road projects. If preferable incentives and conditions are given and secured, private investors may participate in some part of the road development.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-31
Option 1: Public Investment
Note:
Note:
Option 2: Private Sector Participation
Note: Excluding VAT and Administration costSource: JICA Study Team
These road sections should bedesignated as provincial strategicroads for new satellite towndevelopment
Construction Operation andMaintenance
Applicable FS RoadSection
After construction, this road sectionbe changed to national road
External Soft Loan(100%)
GovernmentInvestment Land Acquisition
Civil Works
ConsultancyServices
GOI (APBD I & II)
GOI (APBD I & II)Land Acquisition
Civil WorksPrivate Sector
ConsultancyServices
Road Sections inand access to thenew satellite town
Provincial RoadSection
Private SectorInvestment forDeveloper ofSatellite Town
Private Sector
GovernmentInvestment Land Acquisition
Civil Works
ConsultancyServices
GOI (APBN / APBDI & II)
National RoadSection
GOI (APBN) Maros Town BypassSection
Mamminasa Bypass
GOI (APBN)
Middle Section
Mamminasa Bypass
Kab.Maros & GowaSection
A.D. Sirua Road
GovernmentInvestment Land Acquisition
Civil Works
ConsultancyServices
GOI (APBD I & II)
Provincial RoadSection
GOI (APBD I) Middle North Section &South Section
Mamminasa Bypass
Kab.Maros & GowaSection
A.D. Sirua Road
GOI (APBN)
GOI (APBN / APBD I)
Section D
Hertasning Road
Mamminasa Bypass
Middle Section
GovernmentInvestment Land Acquisition
Civil Works
ConsultancyServices
GOI (APBD I & II)
Makassar CitySection
GOI (APBDII)
GOI (APBD I & II)
Makassar City Section
A.D. Sirua Road
APBN & APBD I
Private Sector
GOI (APBD I)
Note:These road sections might be constructed byprivate sector of new satellite town development.
Figure 10.7.5 Optional Financing Methods for Mamminasa Bypass, Hertasning Road and Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road Projects
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-32
(4) Financing Plan for Mamminasa Bypass
There may be two possible funding options for the development and maintenance of the Mamminasa Bypass Project as illustrated in Table 10.7.5. Option A is to finance the project based on the use of as much local funding as possible, where the project will be developed and maintained as aprovincial road. On the other hand Option B utilizes the funding from GOI as much as possible.
In Option A, the provincial budget of South Sulawesi Province (APBD I) will be used for the construction and maintenance of the project whereas the land acquisition cost will be covered by both APBD I and APBD II (Maros, Gowa and Takalar) and the administration cost also will be covered by both APBD I and APBD II.
Table 10.7.5 Base Project Cost and Funding Options – Mamminasa Bypass Base Cost
Option A Option B B Rp.
1. Civil Works APBD I APBN/ExternalLoan 707.7
2. Consulting Services APBD I APBN/ExternalLoan 49.5
3. Land Acquisition APBD I/APBD II APBD I/APBD II 83.1
4. Administration Cost APBD I/APBD II APBD I/APBD II 14.2
Total 854.55. Routine Maintenance/yr APBD I APBD I 2.06. Periodic Maintenance /5yrs APBD I APBD I 40.4Note: VAT, Price Escalation and Contingency are not included.Source: JICA Study Team
Funding Option
However, the annual size of the road development budget for South Sulawesi Province has been Rp. 50 to Rp. 70 billion in recent years. As indicated in Table 10.7.6, the annual requirement of civil works cost alone for several years will exceed that budget level. The funding requirement of Rp 40 billion will also be heavy for South Sulawesi Province. Therefore, South Sulawesi Province seems to be in difficulty to finance the project by itself. The annual requirement of the land acquisition cost of Rp. 10 billion will also be very high for Kabupaten Maros, Gowa and Takalar since their total road sector budget has been at the Rp. 30 to Rp. 50 billion level.
Table 10.7.6 Annual Distribution of Base Project Cost – Mamminasa Bypass (B Rp.)
Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 20231. Civil Works 707.7 0.0 0.0 84.0 112.0 84.0 43.8 43.8 0.0 50.0 50.0 77.1 86.1 77.1
2. Consulting Services 49.5 0.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 6.7 2.1 2.1 2.9 2.9 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
3. Land Acquisition 83.1 9.6 19.2 19.2 2.2 4.3 4.3 1.9 3.7 6.7 6.1 6.1 0.0 0.0
4. Administration Cost 14.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.6 1.6 0.4 1.2 0.7 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
Total 854.5 10.7 25.2 109.2 120.6 96.6 50.7 48.9 7.3 60.7 61.6 88.7 91.7 82.7Note: VAT is not included.Source: JICA Study Team
In Option B, external soft loan funding will be used for the civil works and consultancy services by DGH and then provided on a granting basis to South Sulawesi Province. Both the land acquisition cost and the administration cost will be supported fully by APBD I.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-33
(5) Financing Plan for Hertasning Road (Section D)
There may be two possible funding options for the development and maintenance of the Hertasning Road Project as indicated in Table 10.7.7. Option A is to finance the project based on the use of as much local funding as possible, where the project will be developed and maintained as a provincial road. The provincial budget of South Sulawesi Province (APBD I) will be used for the construction and maintenance of the project whereas the land acquisition cost will be covered by both APBD I and APBD II (Gowa). The administration cost also will be covered by both APBD I and APBD II.
Table 10.7.7 Base Project Cost and Funding Options - Hertasning Road
Base CostOption A Option B B Rp.
1. Civil Works APBD I APBN* 61.02. Consulting Services APBD I APBN* 4.33. Land Acquisition APBD I/APBD II APBD I/APBD II 9.84. Administration Cost APBD I/APBD II APBD I/APBD II 1.2
Total 76.35. Routine Maintenance/yr APBD I APBD I 0.26. Periodic Maintenance /5yrs APBD I APBD I 4.0Notes: 1. * as this road is used as access road to solid-waste land fill, it might be possible to be financed by APBN. 2. VAT, Price Escalation and Contingency are not included.
Funding Option
Option B is to use APBN since this road is constructed as a main access road for the solid waste landfill planned to be located behind Mt. Moncongloe in Kabupaten Gowa under the central government initiative.
(6) Financing Plan for Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
1) Makassar City Section
The Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road would not have a status of provincial road in accordance with the Law No. 38 of 2004 concerning Roads. There may be two possible funding options for the development and maintenance of the Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road Project as illustrated in Table 10.7.8. Option A is to finance the project based on the use of as much local funding as possible, where the project will be developed and maintained as a Makassar City road. In Option A, Makassar City bears the construction, land acquisition and maintenance costs. On the other hand, Option B is to use the funding from South Sulawesi Province (APBD I) and/or APBN as much as possible.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-34
Table 10.7.8 Base Project Cost and Funding Options - Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
Base Cost Base CostOption A Option B B Rp. Option A Option B B Rp.
1. Civil Works APBD II APBD I/APBDII 91.2 APBD II APBD I/APBN 124.22. Consulting Services APBD II APBD I/APBDII 6.4 APBD II APBD I/APBN 8.73. Land Acquisition APBD II APBD I/APBDII 31.5 APBD II APBD I/APBD II 5.44. Administration Cost APBD II APBD I/APBDII 1.8 APBD II APBD I/APBD II 2.2
Total 130.9 140.55. Routine Maintenance/yr APBD II APBD II 0.2 APBD II APBD I/APBD II 0.26. Periodic Maintenance /5yrs APBD II APBD I/APBD II 1.0 APBD II APBD I 3.9Note: VAT, Price Escalation and Contingency are not included.
Source: JICA Study Team
Makassar City Section Kabupaten Maros and Gowa SectionFunding Option Funding Option
The annual size of the road construction/betterment budget for Makassar has been Rp. 30 to Rp. 50 billion in recent years whereas the annual funding requirement for the civil works and the consultancy services of the project will be Rp 30 to Rp 40 billion. Therefore, it is not likely that Makassar City will be capable of funding the project by itself.
In Option B, APBN will be used for the civil works and consultancy services from DGH through South Sulawesi Province. Both the land acquisition cost and the administration cost will be supported by APBD I and II.
2) Kabupaten Maros and Gowa Section
Option A envisages project financing by Kabupaten Maros and Gowa by APBD II. However, Kabupaten Maros and Gowa do not have capacity for funding the project.
This road should be financed by the province (APBN I) as a provincial strategic road and/or by APBN as this is a strategic road for the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area. In Option B, APBN and APBD I will be used for the civil works and consultancy services from DGH through South Sulawesi Province. Both the land acquisition cost and the administration cost will be supported by APBD I/APBD II.
As the Maros/Gowa section of the Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road is for inducing the creation of a new satellite town, it might be possible to find private investors who participate in the town development to construct the Maros and Gowa section as an access road.
(6) Private Sector Investment
As the central section of the Mamminasa Bypass and the Kabupaten Maros/Gowa section of the Abdullah Daeng Sirua road are for inducing the creation of a new satellite town, it might be possible to find private investors who participate in the new town development to construct these roads as a part of the new town facilities.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-35
10.7.3 External Soft Loan for Mamminasa Bypass and Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
(1) Base Cost
It may be possible to introduce an external soft loan for the central section of the Mamminasa Bypass and the Kabupaten Maros/Gowa section of the Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road as those are for inducing the creation of a new satellite town in accordance with the Mamminasata Spatial Plan.
Table 10.7.9 Base Project Cost for External Financing
Unit: Rp Bill.Item Mamminasa Bypass Abdullah Daeng Sirua
RoadTotal
Middle Section Kab. Maros/GowaSection
Civil Works 279.93 124.20 404.13Consulting Services 19.60 8.70 28.29Land Acquisition 47.91 5.43 53.33Administration Cost 5.60 2.21 7.81
Total 353.03 140.53 493.56Source: JICA Study Team
(2) Project Cost and Loan Amount
Table 10.7.10 shows the financing plan for the project utilizing the external soft loan prepared on the basis of the following assumptions:
* 100% of the costs of civil works, consulting services and contingencies are financed by an external soft loan
* GOI finances the land acquisition/resettlement, administration cost and tax (VAT), which are not eligible for the JBIC loan
* The assumed currency exchange rate is US$ 1.00=¥120=Rp.9,322.
The total project cost is estimated at Rp 814 billion. The loan amount for the project, which is the total cost of civil works, consulting services and contingencies, is estimated to be US$ 72.2 million. The rest of the project cost, namely the land acquisition cost, administration cost and tax cost, estimated to be Rp 150 billion, will be financed by the local budget (APBN and APBD). The loan can cover 81.5% of the project cost.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-36
Table 10.7.10 Project Cost and Loan Amount for Middle Section of Mamminasa Bypass and Kab.Maros/Gowa Section of A.D.Sirua Road (Option of External Loan)
Loan Amount (Allocation of Loan)Category Loan Amount % of Eligible Expenditure
(Million US$) to be financed(A) Civil Works $61.4 100%(B) Consulting Services $4.6 100%(C) Contingencies $6.1
Total $72.2
Breakdown of Loan AmountCategory F.Currency L.Currency Total
(Million US$) (Billion Rp.) (Equiv.Million US$)1. Civil Works $22.23 202.1 $44.452. Price Escalation $3.81 119.9 $16.993. Physical Contingency $2.60 32.2 $6.14 for Civil Works4. Consulting Services $1.99 24.1 $4.64 Incl. Contingencies5. Land Acquisition $0.00 76.4 $8.406. Administration Cost $0.00 7.8 $0.86 Not eligible for 7. Tax $0.00 66.4 $7.30 JBIC Loan
Total $30.62 528.8 $88.79Note: (Equiv. Rp. 807 billion)
Currency Exchange RatesRp 1.00 = ¥0.0130 = US$ 0.000110US$1.00= ¥120 = Rp. 9,322
Civil Works
(3) Annual Fund Requirements
The financing plan is further broken down by annual fund requirements based on the implementation schedule as indicated in Table 10.7.11. In the schedule, the foreign currency component is assumed to be 50% of the civil works and consultancy services costs and the rest is the local currency component. Price escalation is assumed to be 2% per year for the foreign currency component and 6% for the local currency component.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
10-37
Table 10.7.11 Disbursement Schedule for Middle Section of Mamminasa Bypass and Kab.Maros/Gowa Section of A.D.Sirua Road (Option of External Soft Loan)
Category Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015(I) Foreign Currency Portion (Mil US$)
Civil Works (Base Cost) 22.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.22 8.34 6.67Price Escalation 2.0% 3.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 1.43 1.30Physical Contingency 10.0% 2.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.98 0.80
Sub-Total 28.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.12 10.75 8.77Consulting Services (Base Cost) 1.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39Price Escalation 2.0% 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08Physical Contingency 10.0% 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05
Sub-Total 1.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51Total 30.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 9.61 11.25 9.28
(II) Local Currency Portion (Bil Rp.)Civil Works (Base Cost) 202.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.63 75.82 60.62Price Escalation 6.0% 119.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.05 45.02 41.80Physical Contingency 10.0% 32.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.87 12.08 10.24
Sub-Total 354.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 108.55 132.92 112.66Consulting Services (Base Cost) 14.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.54 3.54 3.54 3.54Price Escalation 6.0% 7.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.48 1.78 2.10 2.44Physical Contingency 10.0% 2.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.53 0.56 0.60
Sub-Total 24.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.52 5.85 6.20 6.57Land Acquisition and Resettlement 53.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 11.12 20.88 20.43 0.00 0.00Price Escalation 6.0% 23.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 3.76 8.74 10.29 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 76.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 14.88 29.62 30.71 0.00 0.00Administration Cost 7.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56
Total 462.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 16.44 36.70 146.67 140.69 120.79(III) VAT Tax Portion (Bil Rp.)
Civil Works (Base Cost) 40.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.29 15.36 12.28Price Escalation 15.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.31 5.84 5.39Physical Contingency 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.76 2.12 1.77
Sub-Total 62.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.36 23.31 19.44Consulting Services (Base Cost) 2.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72Price Escalation 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.23 0.27 0.31Physical Contingency 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10
Sub-Total 4.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 1.09 1.13Total 66.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 20.40 24.40 20.57
(IV) Total Project Cost (Bil Rp.)814.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 16.44 42.19 256.69 269.96 227.85
Eligible Portion (Loan Amount) 663.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.01 204.01 244.00 205.7181.5%
Note: Currency Exchange Rates US$ 1.00= Rp. 9,322 = 120 J.YenRp 1.00= US$ 0.00011 = 0.013 J.Yen
Source: JICA Study Team
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
11-1
CHAPTER 11 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
11.1 Conclusions on F/S Roads
11.1.1 Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road
(1) The Study Team identified that the Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road (TSMR) is the highest priority road link among the four F/S roads. It will directly contribute to the development of the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area by:
improving the present urban road network;
coping with the increasing traffic demand;
enhancing regional development; and
supporting logistic flow for inducing trade, investment and industrial development.
It also will indirectly contribute to:
expanding development to the whole eastern regions of Indonesia; and
reducing poverty and regional development gaps.
(2) The feasibility study for the TSMR has shown that the Project is highly viable in both technical and economic aspects (EIRR: 28.5-30.2%). Therefore, it is recommended that the Project be implemented at an earliest date for the benefit of national and regional economy.
(3) As to the construction plan, a full access-controlled express highway for the Middle Ring Road section under PPP (Public Private Partnership) scheme is judged not feasible because its FIRR is only 6.5%. Thus this project should better be implemented in the category of public financing (Government) projects.
(4) Collection of low user charges at the toll gates installed at access points (Tallo River Bridge and Jeneberang River Bridges) to Makassar City could raise a sufficient fund for covering the maintenance costs required for the TSMR.
(5) The current progress of ROW acquisition for the Middle Ring Road (Section B) is approximately 60-70%.
(6) EIA (AMDAL) report on the TSMR Project was approved by the Governor of South Sulawesi Province in September 2007.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
11-2
11.1.2 Mamminasa Bypass
(1) The Study Team identified that the Mamminasa Bypass is the second highest priority road link among the four F/S roads.
(2) The Mamminasa Bypass should be constructed as a new road. The appropriate route is that passing through appropriate topography and location where a new satellite town can be developed. The north section of the Mamminasa Bypass should be planned as a bypass for Maros Town while avoiding a planned flood retarding basin of the Maros River. The southern route should be connected to Jl.Tj.Metro Bunga where many development projects are in progress or under planning.
(3) It will directly contribute to the development of the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area by:
inducing a new satellite town at the east of Makassar City and the west foot of Mt. Moncongloe, where flood free 4,000 ha of land could be available for regulated urban development; and
enhancing regional development, especially contributing to the development of KIWA (planned new industrial area of Gowa Regency).
(4) The feasibility study for the Mamminasa Bypass has shown that the Project is viable on both technical and economic aspects (EIRR: 22.4%). Therefore, it is recommended that the Project be implemented at an earliest date for the benefit of national and regional economy.
(5) As the middle section of the Mamminasa Bypass and the Maros/Gowa Regency section of the Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road are intended to serve directly the planned new satellite town, they might be constructed with cooperation of private investors who will participate in the new satellite town development.
(6) EIA (AMDAL) report on the Mamminasa Bypass Project needs to be approved by the Governor of South Sulawesi Province.
11.1.3 Hertasning Road
(1) The Study Team identified that the Hertasning Road is an important arterial road link for the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area.
(2) The Hertasning Road construction project is an ongoing development project under South Sulawesi Government. It is divided into four sections: Sections A, B, C and D. Section A has already been completed and Section B is under construction. The detailed design for Section C has been completed. Therefore, only Section D was subject to F/S.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
11-3
(3) The Hertasning Road has the following functions:
Direct access road from the east suburbs to the Makassar City center as one of the radial roads.
A main access road to TPA (new final waste disposal area planned at Pattallassang in Gowa Regency).
Enhancement of regional development, especially contributing to the development of KIWA (new industrial area of Gowa Regency).
A short cut route for the Bili-bili Dam and Malino.
(4) The feasibility study for the Hertasning Road has shown that the Project is viable on both technical and economic aspects (EIRR: 33.8%) and it will contribute to national and regional economy.
11.1.4 Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
(1) The Study Team identified that the Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road is one of the important arterial road links for the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area.
(2) The Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road construction project is an ongoing development project under Makassar City. It is divided into six sections: Sections A, B, C, D, E and F, and Section B is under construction. Sections E and F are in the Maros/Gowa Regency
(3) It will directly contribute to the development of the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area by:
inducing a new satellite town at the east of Makassar City and the west foot of Mt. Moncongloe, where flood free 4,000 ha of land could be available for regulated urban development;
providing direct access for the residents staying in the east suburbs of Makassar City; and
enhancing regional development, especially contributing to the development of KIWA (new industrial area of Gowa Regency).
(4) The feasibility study for the Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road has shown that the Project is viable on both technical and economic aspects (EIRR: 31.0%). Therefore, it is recommended that the Project be continued for the benefit of national and regional economy.
(5) As the Maros and Gowa Regency sections are intended to serve directly the planned new satellite town, they might be constructed with cooperation of private investors who will participate in the new satellite town development.
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
11-4
11.2 Recommendations on F/S Roads
11.2.1 Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road
(1) The Trans-Sulawesi Mamminasata Road Project (the TSMRP) should be implemented as a national strategic road link since it is a part of the Trans-Sulawesi West Corridor and an arterial road for the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area.
(2) The TSMRP should be implemented in two phases: Phase 1 for Sections B and C (Middle Ring Road and its southern extension), and Phase 2 for Section A (Maros-Jl.Tol.Ir.Sutami IC) and Section D (Sungguminasa - Takalar).
(3) The Directorate General of Highways (DGH) should request Bappenas to list the TSMRP in the Blue Book for foreign funding assistance.
(4) DGH should conduct an appropriate project evaluation process and propose, preferably to the Government of Japan, for extension of a soft loan for the implementation of the TSMRP, through PU, Bappenas and MOF as soon as possible.
(5) The central and regional governments should negotiate and allocate sufficient budget required for ROW acquisition and resettlement for the project preparation. The ROW acquisition for the Middle Ring Road should be continued.
(6) DGH should make environmental management and monitoring in accordance with the environmental management and monitoring plans established in the EIA Report in cooperation with the agencies concerned.
11.2.2 Mamminasa Bypass
(1) The Mamminasa Bypass Project (the MBP) should be implemented as a provincial strategic road or a national strategic road since it is an arterial road for inducing the creation of a new satellite town for the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area.
(2) The MBP should be implemented in four phases. The middle part of the Mamminasa Bypass should be constructed in the first phase since it is an arterial road for the planned new satellite town.
(3) An external funding would be necessary and, therefore, South Sulawesi Government should request Bappenas to list the MBP in the Blue Book.
(4) A separate study should be conducted for establishment of a satellite town development plan. The private sector should be encouraged to participate in the required infrastructure construction, including access road for the new satellite town development.
(5) The regional governments should control housing and other development on the route of
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
11-5
the Mamminasa Bypass and the planned new town area to secure the land for these developments.
(6) The regional governments should make environmental management and monitoring in accordance with the environmental management and monitoring plans established in the EIA Report in cooperation with the agencies concerned.
11.2.3 Hertasning Road
(1) Implementation of the Hertasning Road Project (the HRP) should be continued by South Sulawesi Province as a provincial strategic road since it is an arterial road of the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area.
(2) The remaining sections of the HRP (Sections C and D) might be implemental as an access road for TPA (new final waste disposal area planned at Pattallassang in Gowa Regency).
(3) A stage construction approach might be applied for Sections C and D of HRP taking tight budget required for both ROW acquisition and construction into consideration. The 1st Stage is widening of the existing 4.5m travelway (carriageway) to a 7.0 m standard road. The 2nd stage is further widening from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with a median.
(4) The regional governments should control housing and other developments within the planned ROW.
(5) The regional governments should make environmental management and monitoring in accordance with the environmental management and monitoring plans etablished in the EIA Report in cooperation with the agencies concerned.
11.2.4 Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road
(1) Makassar City Section
1) Implementation of the Abdullah Daeng Sirua Road Project (the ADSRP) should be continued by Makassar City up to the border of Makassar City and Gowa Regency as a strategic road.
2) Financial assistance by both provincial and central governments should be made since this is an arterial road of the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area.
3) As ROW acquisition is difficult for the beginning section of the ADSRP (Section A) which is located in a densely populated urban area, one-way traffic control should be applied rather than widening it to a 4-lane road, considering the environmental aspect.
4) The construction of the road sections in the semi-urban and residential area should be made by utilizing the ROW of PDAM as much as possible. However, the PDAM canal
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
11-6
should be kept open as much as possible for securing a green and water front environment.
5) The regional governments should make environmental management and monitoring in accordance with the environmental management and monitoring plans established in the EIA Report in cooperation with the agencies concerned.
(2) Maros/Gowa Regency Section
1) The ADSRP in the Maros/Gowa Regency section should be implemented as a provincial strategic road or a national strategic road since it is an arterial road for inducing the creation of a new satellite town for the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area.
2) An external funding would be necessary for the Maros/Gowa Regency section and, therefore, South Sulawesi Government should request Bappenas to list up the ADSRP on the Blue Book, as a package with the middle part of the Mamminasa Bypass.
3) The regional governments should control housing and other developments within the planned ROW.
4) The regional governments should make environmental management and monitoring in accordance with the environmental management and monitoring plans established in the EIA Report in cooperation with the agencies concerned.
11.3 Conclusion and Recommendations on Other Roads
11.3.1 Outer Ring Road
(1) The Outer Ring Road is one of the important links in the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area arterial road network and its expected functions are as follows:
Ring road to contribute to harmonizing urban development;
Logistic route for the coming in and out traffic from/to the southern area of South Sulawesi Province to/from KIMA, Makassar Port, new industrial areas along Jl.Tol.Ir.Sutami; and
Connection between the north educational center and the south educational center.
(2) The Outer Ring Road consists of three parts. The north section is the part accessing to KIMA, Jl.Tol.Ir.Sutami and Makassar Port. The middle section runs along the Tallo River and the south section is a connection to the Sungguminasa and Mamminasa Bypass. The Outer Ring Road and the Mamminasa Bypass share the same road at their southern part to connect to the Tj. Bunga Development Area.
(3) The northern section between Jl.Tol.Ir.Sutami and Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan through the New Industrial Area (Kawasan Pergudangan dan Industri Parangloe Indah) is under
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
11-7
construction by a private investor and will be completed as planned.
(4) Intersections for Jl.Tol.Ir.Sutami and the Outer Ring Road should be constructed under the on-going BOT project.
(5) A 500-700 m buffer zone should be provided between the route of the on-going north section and the Tallo River to avoid negative effects to the river environment.
(6) As the project is vital on both technical and economic aspects (EIRR: 27%), it is recommended to conduct a feasibility study including EIA for its implementation .
11.3.2 Tj.Bunga – Takalar Road (Jalan Lintas Barat Makassar - Takalar)
(1) As floods do not occur at the Jeneberang River estuary after the Bili-bili dam construction, many development projects have been implemented. Since the completion of a bridge at the mouth of the Jeneberang River in 2005, development has expanded to the south. An earliest improvement of the Tj.Bunga - Takalar Road (Lintas Barat) is recommended to regulate the sprawled urban development in the area.
(2) This road link constitutes one of the radial roads (south radial road) in the Mamminasata Urban Arterial Road Network System and it connects the Galesong Port in Takalar. It is recommended to upgrade this road status from Kabupaten road to provincial road as it connects Makassar City to Takalar (Capital of Takalar Regency) along the west coast.
(3) This road will be an alternative route of the Trans-Sulawesi Road from/to Makassar City to/from the southern part of South Sulawesi Province and contribute to reducing the traffic jam at Sungguminasa.
(4) As the economic analysis has shown a very high EIRR of 41.4%, it is recommended that the Project be implemented for the benefit of national and regional economy
(5) Financing for the project implementation should be made by both provincial and central governments since this is an arterial road of the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area.
11.4 Recommendation on Establishment of Coordination Committee for Project Implementation of the F/S Roads
The Study Team understands that good cooperation and coordination between the central governments (Bappenas, MOF and MPW) and regional governments (South Sulawesi Province, Makassar City and Regencies of Maros, Gowa and Takalar) are very important for implementation of the F/S road projects as these are part of the arterial road network for the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area.
The Study Team recommends establishment of a “Project Implementation Committee for Arterial Road Network Development for the Mamminasata Metropolitan Area”. The committee, comprised of the representatives of concerned central and regional governments,
Final Report The Study on Arterial Road Network Development Plan for Sulawesi Island and Feasibility Study on Priority Arterial Roads in South Sulawesi Province March 2008
11-8
holds periodic meetings for monitoring progress of the project implementation, discusses on problems and measures to solve and takes required actions for smooth implementation of the projects.