Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
CFD Study of a Darreous Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
Md Nahid Perveza and Wael Mokhtar
b
a Graduate Assistant
b PhD. Assistant Professor
Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49504
E-mail: , [email protected]
Introduction
GO GREEN! – is a widely used ‘buzzword’ of these days for most of the companies and even
for the policy makers. Some significant steps for saving the environment are - recycling the pop
cans, using bio-degradable packaging materials, reducing the wastage of papers, using more
efficient electric appliances, and using more efficient cars. But how far are we in the journey to
‘going green’? In the year 2010 only eight percent of the total 98.1 quads of energy consumption
of US came from renewable energy sources 1 which roughly is eight quads, in which only 12%
of the energy is from the wind energy 1. So the statistics tell us that we still have a long way to
go. US government has a plan to obtain 20% of the total electric energy supply from renewable
energy sources by the year 2030 2. Wind energy offers a promising renewable energy source and
wind turbines are the only way to extract energy from the wind. HAWT (Horizontal Axis Wind
Turbines) are widely used from the early days to harvest the wind energy. However VAWT
(Vertical Axis Wind Turbine) are relatively new technology and proved to be very effective in
lower wind speed locations such as cities. CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) is a very
powerful tool for examining the flow characteristics of a complex system like the HAWT. In this
paper, flow characteristics around a VAWT is presented using CFD tool.
Literature Review
A technical study was presented by D. Ayhan et. al. 3 about the wind speed variations and flow
characteristics in city area. The boundary layer in a city, effect of building geometry on the
boundary layer and the micro wind flow around the buildings were presented with the help of
CFD tools. Different types of turbines for harnessing the energy were also suggested in that
paper.
An experimental study was done by R. Howell et. al. 4. The airfoil analyzed in that study was
NACA 0022. The chord length of the turbine was 100 mm and the length was limited to 400
mm. they did experiment on both 2 bladed (solidity of 1) and 3 bladed turbines (solidity of 0.67).
The low speed wind tunnel where the tests were performed had a square test section of 1.2m X
1.2m dimension. The reason for that experiment was to get a set of experimental results to
compare with a CFD model. From the study it was found that the predicted performance from
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
the 2D study was much higher than the 3D experimental results. Dynamic behavior of vortices
over the tip of the turbine blade is responsible for that, according to the authors.
A CFD study of an unconventionally designed VAWT was presented by S. McTavish et. al. 5.
The authors made a CFD model of a wind turbine of novel design for mainly micro scale power
generation.
Several modifications of a VAWT are experimented and studied to improve the power
coefficient of the VAWT. One particular modification is incorporating a stator guide vane. A
CFD study on that is presented by K. Pope et. al. 6. A zephyr made VAWT was studied in that
paper.
One particular problem of a VAWT is, it is not self-starting. To eliminate this problem
asymmetric airfoils are used normally. An experimental study was performed on a VAWT with
asymmetric airfoil by M. Takao et. al. 7. The airfoil used in that study was NACA4518 with
stator guide vane.
Present Work
For the simulation of a VAWT, a step by step work flow was maintained. In the beginning, a 2D
analysis was performed for the NACA4518 airfoil and its performance was observed for low
speed wind. A profile of a NACA4518 is shown in figure 1.
Figure 1: Profile of a NACA4518 airfoil
As the airfoil was a blade of a VAWT, it would be subjected to positive and negative angle of
attack. So the angle of attack was varied from -12° to +12°. And the results are presented. Then a
3D model of an airfoil was simulated. Like the 2D analysis, the results of negative and positive
angle of attack are presented. And finally a simplified 3D model of a VAWT with 3 blades was
simulated. The airflow structure and other major flow characteristics around the turbine were
presented. All of the models of the wind turbine used in the study were done by the CAD
software SolidWorksTM
. The length of the wind turbine was 1.514 m (5 feet). The chord length
was 0.127 m (5 inch). CAD models are shown in figures 2, 3 and 4.
-10
0
10
20
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
NACA 4518
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
Figure 2 2D model Figure 3 3D model Figure 4 Simplified turbine model
The applicability of VAWT in the city area is promising. So throughout the analysis the wind
speed was maintained at 6.71 m/s (15 mph). It is the average speed of the city of Johnston Island,
PC 8. The reason for this city is, it has a very decent wind speed throughout the year 8.
Same wind speed was maintained for the 2D, 3D and simplified turbine model. The angle of
attack was varied to observe the characteristics for 2D and 3D. Table 1 displays a summary of
the different simulations.
Table 1
Simulation Type Angle of Attack Speed (m/s)
2D Model -12°, -8°, -4°, 0°, 4°, 8°, 12° 6.71
3D Model -8°, -4°, 0°, 4°, 8° 6.71
Rotation of the simplified turbine model was simulated by applying a tangential velocity at the
walls of the rotor. The rotational velocity was 100 rpm. The orientation of the simplified model
of the turbine was rotated from 0° to 120°. The full performance in the whole 360° region is
found by just repeating the results from 0° to 120°. Table 2 shows the different orientations of
the rotor that were simulated.
Table 2
Simulation Type Orientation Angle Speed (m/s)
Simplified 3D model of the
turbine rotor.
0°, 15° ,30° ,45° ,60° ,75° ,90°
,105° ,120°
6.71
Computational Method
The simulations were performed using STAR CCM+TM
commercial software. It was developed
by CD-Adapco, Inc. and uses computational finite volume method for solving. For this study
segregated flow solver was used. SST k-� turbulence model was used for turbulence model.
For the 2D study the numerical domain had a thickness of one chord length of the airfoil. The
size of the numerical domain was large enough so that the domain boundary do not affect the
simulation results. Figure 5 shows the meshed numerical domain with the airfoil inside it. Note
that the mesh on that figure 5 is the surface mesh. For the surface mesh, surface remesher model
was used. Trimmer volume mesh model was used to generate the volume mesh. The cells were
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
clustered to capture the curvature of the airfoil. Figure 7 shows the growth rate of the mesh as it
moves outward in the domain. Figures 6 and 7 show the surface and volume mesh of the 2D
airfoil respectively.
Figure 5 2D surface mesh of numerical domain
Figure 6 2D surface mesh of airfoil
Figure 7 2D volume mesh of numerical domain Figure 8 2D volume mesh of airfoil
Near the airfoil, to capture the boundary layer, prism layers were used. The thickness of the
boundary layer was determined by repetitive trials so that it can capture the physics of boundary
layer. Volumetric control was also used to cluster the cells around the airfoil to capture the
turbulence and flow separation. Figures 9 and 10 show the boundary layer and the volumetric
control region of the 2D study respectively.
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
Figure 9 Prism layers to capture boundary layer Figure 10 Volumetric control to cluster cells around
the airfoil
Similar approach was followed to simulate the 3D airfoil. For the 3D case only half of the airfoil
simulated with a symmetric boundary to reduce the computational time. Figures 11 and 13 show
the numerical domain with surface mesh and volume mesh for 3D case respectively. Figures 12
and 14 show the airfoil with surface mesh and volume mesh respectively.
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
Figure 11 Surface mesh of domain of 3D model
Figure 12 Surface mesh of airfoil of 3D model
Figure 13 Volume mesh of domain of 3D model
Figure 14 Volume mesh of airfoil of 3D model
For the simplified turbine model the numerical domain had a shape of cylinder. Volumetric
control was used to cluster the cells around the turbine to capture the physics more accurately.
Boundary layer was used to capture the boundary layer. Figures 15 and 16 show the surface
meshes of the numerical domain and the rotor and figures 17 and 18 show the volume mesh of
those.
Figure 15 Surface mesh of numerical domain
Figure 16 Surface mesh of simplified turbine
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
Figure 17 Volume mesh of numerical domain
Figure 18 Volume mesh of simplified turbine
The cell size was increased as it moves outward from the turbine. Figure 19 show the volumetric
control of the cell and gradual increase of the cell size.
Figure 19 Volumetric control to cluster cells around the turbine
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
The major parameters of the 2D and 3D cases are tabulated in table 3.
Table 3
Parameters 2D Airfoil 3D airfoil Simplified Turbine
Geometry:
� Chord length : 0.127
m (5 inch)
� Speed: 6.71 m/s (15
mph)
� Reynolds number:
58300
� Chord length : 0.127
m (5 inch)
� Length : 0.762 m (2.5
feet)
� Speed: 6.71 m/s (15
mph)
� Reynolds number:
58300
� Chord length : 0.127
m (5 inch)
� Length : 1.524 m (5
feet)
� L/D ratio: 12
� Width of the turbine:
3 feet
� Speed: 6.71 m/s (15
mph)
Model: � Trimmer volume
mesh
� Number of cells:
216840
� Segregated flow
� SST k-ω turbulence
model
� Trimmer volume
mesh
� Number of cells:
883204
� Segregated flow
� SST k-ω turbulence
model
� Trimmer volume
mesh
� Number of cells:
623416
� Segregated flow
� SST k-ω turbulence
model
Solver: � AMG linear solver � AMG linear solver � AMG linear solver
CFD Results and Discussions
The 2D analysis was performed to characterize the performance of the airfoil. One of the major
challenges for CFD is to capture the boundary layer and separation region properly. Figure 20
shows the boundary layer and the prism layers used to capture it.
Figure 20 Prism layers capturing the boundary layer
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
From the pressure contour (figure 21) and the velocity vector around the airfoil (figure 22) the
stagnation point is visible. A minute separation region is also found from the velocity vector
(figure 22). Figure 23 show the stream line around the airfoil. Note that all of the results are of
the 0 angle of attack simulation.
Figure 21 Pressure contours around the airfoil for
2D case
Figure 22 Velocity distribution around the airfoil for 2D case
Figure 23 Streamline around the airfoil for 2D case
The coefficient of lift is the most important result for this simulation. The airfoil will be
subjected to a variable angle of attack both in positive and negative direction. So both positive
and negative angle of attack cases were simulated. Coefficients of lift for different angles of
attack are shown in figure 24 for 2D simulation.
Figure 24 Lift of coefficient for 2D simulation
Figure 25 Lift of coefficient for 3D simulation
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-20 -10 0 10 20Lif
t co
effi
cien
t
Angle of attack
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-10 0 10
Lif
t C
oef
fici
ent
Angle of attack
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
The 3D simulations were done in a similar fashion. The coefficients of lift for different angles of
attack can be found in figure 25. Notable fact is that, the performance parameter which is the
coefficients of lift of the airfoil decreases in 3D simulation cases. The coefficient of lift has the
highest value of 0.75 in 3D case where in 2D case the highest value was 0.84.
One of the main objectives of this study was to visualize the flow structure around the VAWT
wind turbine. The complexity of the flow structure makes it hard to visualize. Figure 26 shows
the stream lines around the turbine. The turbine blades were used to seed the streamlines.
Figure 26 Streamline around the simplified turbine
The velocity magnitude around the turbine in figure 27 shows a large separation of flow region
due to the orientation of the airfoil. The lift generated by the wing would provide the moment or
torque to rotate. So at different orientations the torque would be different. In current orientation,
among the three blades one blade is facing the wind in a perpendicular position which is creating
a huge separation region.
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
Figure 27 Velocity profile around the turbine
The pressure contour around the rotor in figure 28 is supporting the fact of separation of flow
due to orientation of the blades.
Figure 28 Pressure contours around the turbine
The rotational velocity of the simplified turbine was simulated by adding a tangential velocity. A
closer look on the velocity vector around the blades from figure 29 shows the tangential velocity.
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
Figure 29 Velocity distribution at the vicinity of the turbine wall
The moment is the main indicator for the turbine power generation. But the moment varies due
to the different orientation of the blades. The wind direction was varied from 0° to 120° and the
moment around the rotor calculated from the simulation. As it is a 3 bladed rotor, the moments at
other angles were found by repeating the results. Figure 30 show moments generated by the
rotor.
Figure 30 Moment generated by turbine
The average torque was found 0.1144 N-m at 100 rpm. The turbine produces 1.198 watt of
power. The results show that the turbine has a very low efficiency. Further modification of the
turbine structure and proper modeling of the turbine in CFD will provide more accurate results.
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Moment at angle
Average moment
Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Copyright © 2012, American Society for Engineering Education
Conclusion
CFD is very effective for visualizing the complex flow structure around the vertical axis wind
turbine. This study had primary objective to visualize the flow structure, analyze the
performances of the airfoil NACA 4518 and act as preliminary study for a complex unsteady
analysis of a VAWT. 2D, 3D and simplified model of a VAWT is simulated and results are
presented in this study. The flow structure is presented for the simplified turbine in the form of
streamlines. Performance parameter which is the coefficient of lift is presented for different
angle of attacks. Performance differences in 2D and 3D studies are also observed. For simplicity,
the rotational motion of the turbine was simulated by adding tangential velocity on the walls of
the rotor. This is a simplified approach to a complex fluid-solid interaction problem. From th
performance of the VAWT is relatively lower than that of a HAWT. However significant
structural modifications and proper mathematical modeling will provide accurate results.
References
1. U. S. DOE, Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2011) Monthly Energy Review
September 2011
2. U. S.DOE, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 20% Wind Energy by 2030 July 2008
3. Ayhan, D., Saglam, S., “A technical review of building-mounted power systems and a
sample simulation model”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16 (2012) 1040-
1049
4. Howell, R., Qin, N., Edwards, J., Durrani, N., “Wind tunnel and numerical study of a small
vertical axis wind turbine”, Renewable Energy 35 (2010) 412-422
5. Mctavish, S., Feszty, D., Sankar, T., “Steady and rotating computational fluid dynamics
simulations of a novel vertical axis wind turbine for small-scale power generation”,
Renewable Energy 41 (2012) 171-179
6. Pope, K., Rodrigues, V., Doyle, R., Tsopelas, A., Gravelsins, R., Naterer, G. F., Tsang, E.,
“Effect of stator vanes on power coefficients of a zephyr vertical axis wind turbine”,
Renewable Energy 35 (2010) 1043-1051
7. Takao, M., Kuma, H., Maeda, T., Kamada, Y., Oki, M., Minoda, A., “A Straight-bladed
Vertical Axis Wind Turbine with a Direct Guide Vane Row – Effect of Guide Vane
Geometry on the Performance”, Journal of thermal Science Vol. 18, No. 1 (2009) 54-57
8. Comparative Climatic Data , Wind – Average Wind Speed – (MPH), Retrieved from the web
on December 2011, site: http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/online/ccd/avgwind.html,
National Climatic Data Center, U. S. Department of Commerce.