Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cancer Survivorship:Research and Practice
Dr. Amanda Ward, Cancer Rehabilitation, Sociobehavioural Research Centre,
BC Cancer Agency
1. Defining survivorship2. Overview of research and practice3. BCCA/SRC projects4. Discussion
‘Disease Free’Remission
Managed Chronic or Intermittent
Disease
Treatment Failure
Recurrence/ Second Cancer
Treatment with Intent to Cure
Palliative Treatment
Diagnosis and Staging
DeathSurvivorship CareLate effects management and surveillance for recurrence and second cancers
From diagnosis until end of life
Survivorship
Quantity:one million survivors in Canadagrowth rate = 2.5% year5 yr survival rate = 60%
Quality:75% survivors have health problems>50% live with chronic painUp to 45% report emotional distress
Areas of Need
Physical
PracticalSpiritual
Social
Emotional
IndividualInformational
Individual level: physical problems, psychosocial adjustment, practical concerns
Population level: changes over time (patterns), identify high‐risk subgroups, co‐morbidities
System level: service availability, resource allocation, care strategies, policy implementation
Optimal Survivorship Care?
The fundamental question for living beyond cancer is how the optimal care should be delivered, by whom, in what setting, to what guidelines and best practices?
(Rowland 2006)
Recommendations
• Awareness and Advocacy• Standards and Guidelines• Screening and Assessment Tools• Referral Pathways and Care Plans• Surveillance and Prevention of second cancers and other late effects– Interventions/Programs– Promotion of healthy behaviours
• Research Evaluation: monitoring of outcomes to guide clinical practice
Barriers?
Practice• No uniform, evidence‐based guidelines• No care plans: unstructured continuity of care• Lack of understanding about roles and responsibility
Research• Limited tools to assess needs and outcomes• Deficit in evidence‐based research to guide practice
Vision and Leadership in Survivorship
Practice Development and Application
Generation of Evidence Based Research
Recognition of ImportanceAwareness and Receptiveness
Health Practice PriorityInvestment and Sustainability
Discovery
Clinical Validation
PopulationApplication
Research and Practice Model
Initiatives
Practice and Research
• Independent/local
• Provincial
• National
• International
Provincial (BCCA)
• Medical follow‐up– Clinic: paediatric & adolescents
• Education & resources: Nursing
• Patient & Family CounsellingSupport Groups, Vocational Rehab, Resources
Intervention: Cancer Transitions Program
• Prevention: health promotion
• Links to community based organizations
National
Cancer Agencies/ Community‐based Organizations Programs, workshops, PF counselling, support gps, rehabilitation servicesPrincess Margaret Hospital: Breast Cancer Survivorship Program/Clinic
‐ Clinical assessment and care planning‐ Website calendar: programs etc. ‐ Rehabilitation clinic ‐ Community engagement‐ Research
International
• UK
National initiative –improve services/research
• USA
Cancer Centres (LAF), physical & psychosocial care
Research
Imperative• > number of survivors• Problems post‐treatment• Opportunities to improve quality of life• Challenges for continuity in care• Potential to reduce system costs• Limited research in this area• Research advancing practice
Research
National
• National Invitational Cancer Survivorship Workshop, 2008
• Pan‐Canadian Invitational Workshop, Vancouver, 2009
• Canadian Cancer Research Alliance, Toronto, 2010
• Research Consortium Meeting, Vancouver, 2010
International
• Workshop, MASCC, Vancouver, 2010
Research Priorities
Health services research• Operational Models of CareClinical research• Effective InterventionsBiological research• Mechanisms underlying long‐term
late effectsPopulation research• High risk sub‐groups: needs and
characteristics
Tool Development
Data Collection
Measuring Outcomes
Research Question?
What are the risk factors that predispose a survivor to recurrence or second primary?
Biological Psychosocial
Research Priorities Practice
Survivorship Research Program
Measurement/ToolDevelopment
Needs/Characteristics of Unique Pop
Evaluation of EffectiveModels of Care
Development of Effective Interventions
Mechanisms Underlying
Long-term Effects
SurvivorshipDatabase
NavigationSurvivorship Care Plans
InterventionsCancer
TransitionsEmpower
Screening TargetOutcomes
2008 ‐ 2012 Cancer Transitions
2010 ‐ 2012 Empower
2010 ‐ 2012 Survivorship Care Plans
2008 ‐ 2012
Education & support • Life Beyond Cancer• Exercise• Emotional Health• Nutrition• Medical Management
Self‐management: practical tools to encourage goal setting for physical and emotional well‐being
CBO: Community Based OrganizationCBOBarrie, ONGildaʹs ClubCancer CenterSaskatoon, SKSaskatchewan Cancer AgencyCancer CenterTrail, BCKootney Boundary HospitalCancer CenterCape Breton, NSCape Breton Cancer CentreCancer CenterSudbury, ONSudbury Regional HospitalCancer CenterVancouver, BCBC Cancer Agency‐ VCCCancer CenterWinnipeg, MBCancer Care ManitobaCancer CenterVanderhoof, BCNorthern Health‐ St. Johnʹs HospitalCancer CenterHalifax, NSCapital Health Cancer CentreCBOOttawa, ONOttawa Regional FoundationCBOMontreal, QCHope & CopeCBOToronto, ONWellspring
Cancer CenterPrince George, BCNorthern Health
Cancer CenterVictoria, BCBCCA‐ Vancouver Island
Organization TypeLocationSite
Demographics and Medical HistoryAge = 55
7 months post treatment
White (90%), Female (90%), Breast (58%)
Married (65%), Bachelors (50%)
Retired/unemployed (40%), > $40,000 (70%)
Colorectal, lymphoma, prostate, lung (5 – 10%)
Co‐morbid conditions (60%)
N = 116
Measuring Outcomes
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25
Avoid fat as flavouring
Substitute lower fat products
Replace with fruits andvegetables
Replace meats
Increase fruits and vegetables
Substitute with higher fiber
Whole grains
Modify meats
Overall
Mean improvement (%)
3 months6 weeks
*
* p< 0.05
*
*
*
*
**
*
Eating Patterns Physical Activity
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Total physical activity
Low
Moderate
High
Mean improvement (mins/week)
3 months6 weeks
*
* p<0.05
Physical Activity
*
Measuring Outcomes
*
*
*
*p < 0.05
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Physical functioning
Physical accomplishment
Bodily pain
General health
Vitality
Social functioning
Emotionalaccomplishment
Mental health
Mean improvement (%)
3 months6 weeks
**
**
*
*
*
*
Impact of Cancer Health Related Quality of Life
*
*
0 5 10 15 20
Negative body image
Negative self-evaluation
Negative outlook
Life interferences
Health worry
Mean improvement (%)
3 months6 weeks
*
* p < 0.05
*
*
*
Program Materials
Group Topics
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
CancerTransitionsParticipantWorkbook
Exercise Log Food Diary Action Plan The Road toSurvivorship:Living After
CancerTreatmentBrochure
LIVESTRONGCancer
Survivors HealthJournal
LIVESTRONGCancer
Survivor'sMedical
TreatmentSummary
%
Program Materials
57How you feel when others express fear, sadness, or anger
10
58Encouraging each other to be more assertive
9
62One’s accomplishments8
65Confronting difficult problems and fears7
68Direct advice about physicians, treatments, side effects
6
73Recreation5
74Details of treatment or side effects4
78Communication with physicians and medical personnel
3
79Access to resources for coping with cancer2
81Thinking positively1
Overall %Overall Ranking
1 to 10
Most frequently discussed group topics
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 Session 5 Session 6
Attendance %
Attendance
Empowerment for Survivorship
Emotional Well‐Being: Coping and Communication
Medical Management, Practical Issues, and Finding Meaning
2010‐2012
Demographics• Age = 56
• Survivor = 8.5m post treatment
• White (93%), Male/Female (50%)
• Married (60%)
• Retired/home (42%), full‐time (25%), part‐time (17%), sick/disability (16%)
• Supporting: Breast survivor (67%)Recruitment and evaluation ongoing
Delivering Cancer Survivorship Care to Rural and Remote Communities in
Northern British Columbia2010 - 2012
Survivorship Care Plan– Treatment summary
– Schedule of follow‐up appointments
– Potential side effects
– Symptoms of recurrence
– Healthy lifestyle choices
– Directory of supportive care services
– Additional resources
Determine unmet needs of survivors– Six partner communities– Health care provider & survivor
Develop and pilot survivorship care planDelivery methods– Navigation model– Self‐management model (self‐directed)
Research Evaluation– Pre and post‐evaluation– Feasibility of effective delivery– Measurable Outcomes for cancer survivors– Impact on health care system
Dawson Creek
Smithers
Terrace
Vanderhoof
Takla Landing
Tsay Keh Village
Future BCCA Priorities
• Inventory of current survivorship activities• Implement post treatment standards & guidelines• Implement and evaluate screening for distress• Screening & Prevention: recurrence/second primary• Create interdisciplinary research activity/ teams• Liaise survivor advocacy groups to align priorities• Establishing an Endowed Chair in Cancer Survivorship• Recruiting for a Survivorship Program Coordinator• Building a Canadian Consortium for Survivorship Research
Awareness and Receptiveness
Investment and Sustainability
Thank you!
Questions?
Discussion