C4E for Citywide

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    1/19

    Contracts for Excellence:

    New York Citys failures and violations of law

    as regards class size

    November 15, 2011

    Leonie Haimson, Class Size Matters

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    2/19

    Contracts for Excellence

    In April 2007, NY State settled the Campaign for Fiscal lawsuit by passingthe Contracts for Excellence (C4E) law. State agreed to send billions inadditional aid to NYC & other high needs school districts; which they wouldhave to spend in six approved areas, including class size reduction.*

    In addition, NYC had to submit a plan to reduce class size in all grades.

    In fall of 2007, the state approved DOEs plan to reduce class sizes onaverage to no more than 20 students per class in K-3; 23 in grades 4-8 and25 in core HS classes.

    In return, NYS has sent $2.4 billion in C4E funds to NYC since 2007.

    *other allowed programs include Time on Task; Teacher & Principal Quality; Middle & HSRestructuring; Full-Day Pre-K; & Model Programs for English Language Learners

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    3/19

    Yet despite citys promise, class sizes have risen

    sharply in K-3; this year, the 5th year of CSR plan, byone student per class, far above C4E goals

    This years class size data at http://schools.nyc.gov/AboutUs/data/classsize/classsize.htm

    2120.7

    20.520.3

    20.119.9

    21 20.9

    21.4

    22.1

    22.9

    23.9

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    Baseline 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

    NYC class sizes K-3actuals vs. C4E goals

    C4E goals

    Citywide actual

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    4/19

    24.9

    23.2

    22.422.1

    21.721.6

    21.321.1

    21.0 20.9

    21.4

    22.1

    22.9

    23.9

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    K-3 Class sizes largest since 1998(data sources: IBO 1998-2005; DOE 2006-11)

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    5/19

    Also in grades 4-8,class sizes have continued to increase

    far above C4E goals

    25.6

    24.824.6

    23.8

    23.3

    22.9

    25.6

    25.125.3

    25.8

    26.326.6

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    students

    perclass

    NYC class sizes 4th-8thactuals vs. C4e goals

    C4E target

    Citywide actual

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    6/19

    Also in HS: average class sizeshave risen far above goals

    25.6

    26.1 26.2

    26.627

    26

    25.7

    25.2

    24.8

    24.5

    23

    23.5

    24

    24.5

    25

    25.5

    26

    26.5

    27

    27.5

    2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

    students

    perclass

    HS core class sizesactuals vs. C4E goals

    Actual

    C4E targets

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    7/19

    Why is class size important?

    Class size reduction one of 4 reforms proven to work throughrigorous evidence, acc. to Inst. Education Sciences, research arm ofUS Ed Dept. *

    Benefits especially large for disadvantaged & minority students, veryeffective at narrowing the achievement gap.

    NYC schools have largest class sizes in state; in 2003, NYs highestcourt said students denied constitutional right to adequate educationas a result of excessive class sizes (Campaign for Fiscal Equitydecision).

    86% of NYC principals say cannot provide a quality educationbecause of excessive class sizes.

    Smaller classes are top priority of parents on DOE learningenvironment surveys every year.

    *Other three K-12 evidence-based reforms, are one-on-one tutoring by qualified tutors for at-risk readers

    in grades 1-3, Life-Skills training for junior high students, and instruction for early readers in phonemicawareness and phonics.

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    8/19

    23.7

    22.6

    24.7

    23.7

    24.7

    21.5

    22

    22.5

    23

    23.5

    24

    24.5

    25

    Brooklyn Manhattan Queens Bronx Staten I

    2011 average K-3 class size by Borough

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    9/19

    26.2

    25.3

    27.7

    25.8

    28.5

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    29

    Brooklyn Manhattan Queens Bronx Staten I

    2011 average class size 4-8 by Borough

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    10/19

    No. of Kindergarten students in very largeclasses has increased sharply

    This year 42% (29797) of Kindergarten students inclasses of 25 or more (25 is UFT contractual max);

    Last year, for 1st time since 2000, there were more Kstudents in classes of 25 or more than in classes of 20 orless;

    This year, for 1st

    time since 1999, there were as many Kstudents in classes of 20 or less (C4E goals) than inclasses HIGHER than 25.

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    11/19

    58% 58%

    39%

    31%

    20%

    17%

    20%

    26%

    33%

    42%

    30%

    27%

    16%

    11%7% 6% 6%

    8% 11% 16%8% 9%

    23%

    33%

    41% 40%38%

    27%

    24%

    16%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    % Kindergarten classes, large, very large &small since 1998

    % at 25 or more

    % over 25

    % at 20 or less

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    12/19

    Why is this important?

    When Bloomberg first ran for office,promised that he would reduce class sizein grades K-3 to 20 or less.

    Recent study shows that students insmaller classes in K are more likely to

    graduate from college, own home andhave 401K3 more than 20 years later.*

    *Raj Chetty et. al. How Does your Kindergarten classroom affect your earnings? Evidence from Project Star, NBER Working Paper 16381

    http://www.classsizematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Chetty-et-al3.pdfhttp://www.classsizematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Chetty-et-al3.pdfhttp://www.classsizematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Chetty-et-al3.pdfhttp://www.classsizematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Chetty-et-al3.pdfhttp://www.classsizematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Chetty-et-al3.pdfhttp://www.classsizematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Chetty-et-al3.pdfhttp://www.classsizematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Chetty-et-al3.pdf
  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    13/19

    What happened to the C4Eprogram?

    Despite more than $2 billion in C4E funds and higheroverall spending, city has cut school budgets about 14%since 2007.

    Maintenance of effort provision in C4E law was ignored(city cut funding to schools when state increasedspending despite prohibition of supplanting)

    Overcrowding in many schools worsened by growingenrollment & damaging co-locations.

    C4E state funding never reached full level & has now

    flat-lined or slightly decreased.

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    14/19

    But even when state C4E spendingincreased; class sizes grew !

    0

    258

    645 645

    531

    21 20.9

    21.4

    22.1

    22.9

    18

    18.5

    19

    19.5

    20

    20.5

    21

    21.5

    22

    22.5

    23

    23.5

    $-

    $100

    $200

    $300

    $400

    $500

    $600

    $700

    2006-7 2007-2008 2008-9 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

    C4Espending(inmillions)

    K-3averageclasssize

    C4E

    goals

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    15/19

    Why? administration had otherpriorities

    Between 2002-9, while out-of-classroom positions grewby over 10 thousand, general ed classroom teachersshrunk by more than 1600.*

    In 2010, there were 2,000 fewer teaching positions and18,000 more students.

    This year, there are 2,500 fewer teachers and 20,000more students.

    Spending on testing, contracts, consultants, and morebureaucrats have all risen sharply.

    (including principals, secretaries, APs, literacy coaches, etc. NY Times, With More Money, City Schools AddedJobs, June 30, 2009).

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    16/19

    But can we afford to reduce class size?

    In 2009, DOE estimated that it would cost $358million per year to achieve average C4E class sizegoals across the city;

    DOE estimated it would cost $448 million per year instaffing to achieve class size goals in ALL schools;plus more in capital costs for school construction.

    This year, NYC is to receive more than $530 millionin C4E funds.

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    17/19

    Other questions re citys plan

    State ed allocated $530.8M in C4E funds to city thisyear. Yet citys plan only includes $348M; whathappened to rest of these funds?

    Why did the city choose not to centrally allocate a pennyof C4E funds to class size reduction, given they had alegal obligation to lower class size ?

    Only C4E district-wide initiative that DOE claims asclass size reduction is to expand CTT classes, which

    does not lower class size.

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    18/19

    Problems with public process

    This year, C4E meetings happening too late in the school year;supposed to happen before money spent, so public can have input.

    This yr., SED asked to pre-approve plan; but state law says citysplan should be submitted to state only after public hearingsoccurred, so that public comments can help guide decision as towhether plan needs changing.

    C4E law requires for borough hearings as well as CEC

    presentations; but DOE has refused to do this since 2008.

    See letter to Commissioner King from CSM & UFT, pointing out themany violations of law in public process this year.

  • 8/3/2019 C4E for Citywide

    19/19

    Contractual limits vs.C4E class size goals

    UFT Contract limits

    C4E Class Size goals

    by 2011Kindergarten 25 19.9

    1-3 grades 28 19.9

    4-5 (Title 1

    Schools)32 22.9

    4-5 (Non-Title 1) 32 22.9

    6-8 (Title 1

    Schools)30 22.9

    6-8 (Non-Title 1) 33 22.9

    9-12 (core

    classes)34 24.5