Busan - supplychainindonesia.com · 4 CNTR Terminal Operators 8m TEU Capacity 20 berths New Port ... Laem Chabang Laem Chabang Laem Chabang Tanjung Priok Tanjung Priok ... Feasibility

Busan

Current Status

Contents

1. Current Status of Busan Port

2. Busan New Port Development Project

3. Distripark Development Project

4. Busan North Port Redevelopment Project

Contents

Current Status of Busan Port 1

Current Status of Busan Port

History of Busan Port

1876 1940 21st Century 1970

1950’s 1970’s

Present


Busan Port

25km

5

North Port(Old Port)

New Port


Busan Port (Old Port, north port)


Busan Port (New Port)


North Port & New Port

8

North Port

◈ 4 CNTR Terminal Operators ◈ 8m TEU Capacity ◈ 20 berths

New Port

◈ 5 CNTR Terminal Operators ◈ 12m TEU Capacity ◈ 23 berths


Busan Port T/put (2009~2014)

11,980

14,194

16,185 17,046 17,686

18,652

6,569 7,836

8,832 8,898 8,938

9,238

5,372 6,276

7,353 8,148

8,748 9,414

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

'09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14

Total Local T/S

(50.5%) (49.5%)

(47.8%) (45.4%)

(44.2%) (44.8%)

(Unit : ‘000 TEU)


Domestic CNTR Market Share in 2014

Total T/put in Korea : 24.73million TEU

BUSAN 18,652 (75.4%)

Gwangyang (9.4%)

Incheon (9.4%)

Pyungtaek (2.2%)

Ulsan (1.6%)

Pohang (0.4%) Others

(1.4%)

※ Busan Share 2010 (73%) → 2014 (75.4%)

(Unit : ‘000 TEU)


Domestic Market Share (Local vs T/S)

Transshipment

Import&Export

BUSAN 63.4%

Incheon 15.9%

Gwangyang 12.5%

Ulsan 2.6% Pyungtaek

3.7%

Others 1.8%

BUSAN 94.3%

Gwangyang 5.2% Incheon 0.2%

Others 0.1%


World’s Top 10 Container Ports

No. Port Country 2013 2014

1 Shanghai China 33.62 35.28

2 Singapore Singapore 32.58 33.87

3 Shenzhen China 23.28 24.04

4 Hong Kong China 22.35 22.28

5 Ningbo-zhoushan China 17.33 19.45

6 Busan South Korea 17.68 18.65

7 Qingdao China 15.66 16.70

8 Guangzhou China 15.32 15.69

9 Jebel Ali UAE 13.64 15.20

10 LA/LB USA 14.60 15.16

(Unit : million TEU)

• source : Port Authority Websites, Alphaliner • (2014) Qingdao, Guangzhou, Jebel Ali = estimation

7 out of 10 world’s busiest ports are in N.E. ASIA

World’s top 10 Container Ports 1985 1990 1995 2000 2002 2004 2008 2010 2012 2013 2014

1 Rotterdam

Singapore

Hong Kong

Hong Kong

Hong Kong

Hong Kong

Singapore

Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai

(2,655) (5,224) (12,550) (18,090) (19,144) (21,932) (29,918) (29,069) (32,529) (33,617) (35,285)

2 NY/NJ

Hong Kong

Singapore

Singapore

Singapore

Singapore

Shanghai

Singapore Singapore Singapore Singapore

(2,367) (5,101) (11,830) (17,090) (16,941) (21,329) (27,980) (28,431) (31,649) (32,579) (33,868)

3 Hong Kong

Rotterdam

Kaohsiung

Busan

Busan

Shanghai

Hong Kong

Hong Kong Hong Kong Shenzhen Shenzhen

(2,289) (3,667) (5,232) (7,540) (9,453) (14,557) (24,248) (23,532) (23,097) (23,278) (24,030)

4 Kobe

Kaohsiung

Rotterdam

Kaohsiung

Shanghai

Shenzhen

Shenzhen

Shenzhen Shenzhen Hong Kong Hong Kong

(1,519) (3,495) (4,787) (7,426) (8,620) (13,650) (21,400) (22,509) (22,941) (22,288) (22,270)

5 Antwerp

Kobe

Busan

Rotterdam

Kaohsiung

Busan

Busan

Busan Busan Busan Ningbo

(1,350) (2,596) (4,503) (6,274) (8,493) (11,492) (13,453) (14,194) (17,041) (17,686) (19,450)

6 Yokohama

LA

Hamburg

Shanghai

Shenzhen

Kaohsiung

Dubai

Ningbo Ningbo Ningbo Busan

(1,327) (2,587) (2,890) (5,613) (7,614) (9,710) (12,000) (13,144) (16,830) (17,327) (18,652)

7 Hamburg

Busan

LongBeach

LA

Rotterdam

Rotterdam

Ningbo

Guangzhou Guangzhou Qingdao Qingdao

(1,159) (2,348) (2,844) (4,879) (6,506) (8,300) (11,226) (12,550) (14,743) (15,520) (16,624)

8 Keelung

Hamburg

Yokohama

LongBeach

LA

LA

Guangzhou

Qingdao Qingdao Guangzhou Guangzhou

(1,158) (1,969) (2,757) (4,601) (6,106) (7,321) (11,001) (12,012) (14,500) (15,309) (16,160)

9 Busan

NY/NJ

LA

Hamburg

Hamburg

Hamburg

Rotterdam

Dubai Dubai Dubai Dubai

(1,148) (1,872) (2,555) (4,248) (5,374) (7,003) (10,830) (11,600) (13,265) (13,641) (15,249)

10 LongBeach

Keelung

Antwerp

Antwerp

Antwerp

Dubai

Qingdao

Rotterdam Tianjin Tianjin Tianjin

(1,141) (1,828) (2,329) (4,082) (4,777) (6,429) (10,320) (11,146) (12,295) (13,000) (14,050)


Europe Top-5 Container Ports (1970~2013)

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013

Rotterdam (242)

Rotterdam (1,901)

Rotterdam (3,666)

Rotterdam (6,280)

Rotterdam (11,146)

Rotterdam (11,621)

Antwerp (215)

Hamburg (783)

Hamburg (1,969)

Hamburg (4,248)

Antwerp (8,468)

Hamburg (9,302)

Belfast (210)

Antwerp (724)

Antwerp (1,549)

Antwerp (4,082)

Hamburg (7,900)

Antwerp (8,578)

Bremerhaven (195)

Bremerhaven (702)

Felixstowe (1,417)

Felixstowe (2,853)

Bremerhaven (4,536)

Bremerhaven (5,830)

Tilbury (155)

Le Havre (507)

Bremen/Bremerhaven (1,198)

Bremen/Bremerhaven (2,752)

Valencia (3,654)

Algeciras (4,500)

∙ ( ) : ‘000 TEU ∙∙ Source : Containerisation International

Asia Top-5 Container Ports (1970~2013)

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013

Kobe (90)

Hong Kong (1,465)

Singapore (5,223)

Hong Kong (18,098)

Shanghai (29,069)

Shanghai (33,617)

Tokyo (54)

Kaohsiung (979)

Hong Kong (5,100)

Singapore (17,087)

Singapore (28,431)

Singapore (32,240)

Nagoya (44)

Singapore (917)

Kaohsiung (24,384)

Singapore(PSA) (17,040)

Hong Kong (23,532)

Shenzhen (23,278)

Hong Kong (35)

Kobe (727)

Kobe (3,495)

Busan (7,540)

Shenzhen (22,509)

Hong Kong (22,352)

Osaka (30)

Yokohama (722)

Busan (2,596)

Kaohsiung (7,426)

Busan (14,157)

Busan (17,686)

∙ ( ) : ‘000 TEU ∙∙ Source : Containerisation International


Container Volume Forecast

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

900,000

1 2 3 4 5 6

243,374 259,600 279,456

301,242 324,120

348,696

616,234 646,789

686,596 730,817

778,431

829,377

Ser…

Ser…

N.E.Asia

World

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

(Unit : ‘000 TEU)

(38.4%)

(38.8%) (39.5%) (40.1%) (41.6%) (42.0%)

Rising Portion in N.E. ASIA expected

* Source : Drewry Maritime Research

Capacity deployed on intra-Far East routes

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

4,000-5,099TEU

3,000-3,999TEU

2,000-2,999TEU

1,000-1,999TEU

100-999TEU

Million TEU

Source : Alphaliner Weekly Newsletter Volume 2015 Issue 21

South East Asian Top 15 Ports

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Singapore Singapore Singapore Singapore Singapore

Port Klang Port Klang Port Klang Port Klang Port Klang

Tanjung Pelepas Tanjung Pelepas Tanjung Pelepas Tanjung Pelepas Tanjung Pelepas

Laem Chabang Laem Chabang Laem Chabang Tanjung Priok Tanjung Priok

Jawaharlal Nehru Jawaharlal Nehru Tanjung Priok Laem Chabang Laem Chabang

Tanjung Priok Tanjung Priok Ho Chi Minh Ho Chi Minh Ho Chi Minh

Ho Chi Minh Colombo Colombo Jawaharlal Nehru Colombo

Colombo Ho Chi Minh Jawaharlal Nehru Colombo Jawaharlal Nehru

Manlia Manlia Manlia Manlia Manlia

Tanjung Perak Tanjung Perak Tanjung Perak Tanjung Perak Tanjung Perak

Karachi Chennai Chennai Mundra Mundra

Bangkok Bangkok Bangkok Chennai Karachi

Chennai Karachi Karachi Karachi Chittagong

Chittagong Chittagong Chittagong Chittagong Bangkok

Mundra Mundra Mundra Bangkok Chennai

000 TEU

Source : IAPH Statistics

1. Location

2. International network

3. Service (Productivity & etc.)

4. Cost

What will ensure sustainability of port ?


Location : Between the World’s Factory & 3rd Largest Economy

Competitiveness of Busan Port

Singapore

Hong Kong

Qingdao

Zarubino

Vladivostok

35,286 33,869

24,037

22,283 19,450

18,652 16,700

Shanghai Singapore Shenzhen Hong

Kong Busan Ningbo Qingdao

※Source : Alphaliner

(Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2014)

N.America: 57

Korea

S.America : 33

Russia : 11

Chaina : 43

S.E. Asia : 85

Japan : 71 Europe : 37

Oceania : 25

M.East : 12

Africa : 1

Connectivity(Ocean-going) 368 weekly services

※As of the end of 2013





33,617 32,579

23,278

22,352

17,327 15,520


Kong Ningbo Qingdao

※Source : BPA

(Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013)

1D

1.5D

1.5D

9D

25 D

2D

2D

Japan : 60 ports China : 45 ports Russia : 5 ports

Connectivity (Feeder Network)



33,617 32,579

23,278

22,352

17,327 15,520


Kong Ningbo Qingdao

※Source : BPA

(Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013)

Free from Natural Influence of Fog, Wind, etc.

Stability

Well Sheltered Natural Harbor

Transhipment HUB Port



33,617 32,579

23,278

22,352

17,327 15,520


Kong Ningbo Qingdao

※Source : BPA

(Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013)

Deep Water ★ Water Depth : 15~16m (17m by 2016) ★ Little Tidal Difference : 1.3m

The World’s Largest vessels calling at Busan Port

18,270 TEU vessel

“Maersk MC-Kinney

Moller”

(July 15, 2013)

19,224 TEU vessel

“MSC Oscar”

(Jan. 8, 2015)

Busan New Port Development Project

2


Busan New Port

33,617 32,579

23,278

22,352

17,327 15,520


Kong Ningbo Qingdao

※Source : BPA

(Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013)

◈ 5 Container & 1 Multipurpose ◈ 23 berth(CNTR 21 + Multi 2)

◈ Quay Length : 7.5km ◈ 12m TEU capacity

◈ Period : 1995~2020 ◈ Total Budget : USD 16.7 billion ◈ 45 berth(CNTR 40 + General 5)

◈ Quay Length : 14.71km ◈ 25m TEU H/Capacity


Busan New Port

33,617 32,579

23,278

22,352

17,327 15,520


Kong Ningbo Qingdao

※Source : BPA

(Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013)

The World’s Largest Container Vessel MSC Oscar (19,224TEU)

Maiden Call at Busan New Port 8 Jan 2015


Busan New Port Development Plan

33,617 32,579

23,278

22,352

17,327 15,520


Kong Ningbo Qingdao

※Source : BPA

(Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013)

Phase 2-5 (3)

Phase 2-6 (2)

BPA Concession

Private Investment

HJNC (4)

Future Plan

HJNC(4) PNC(6) PNIT(3)

Multipurpose TML

◈ 3 berths, Length : 1,050m ◈ Capacity : 1.8m TEU/year ◈ Budget : KRW 6446.6 billion ◈ BTO Development ◈ 4-year Construction(by 2019) ◈ 30-year Operation

To-island Removal Dredging Plan

◈ Size : 24,496㎡ ◈ Island removed by 2017

◈ 15m→17m(2013~2016)


Accomodating Bigger Vessels


Busan New Port in 2020


Busan New Port Summary l

Strong Industrial Back Ground Synergy Effect by Complex of

Logistics Geographic Stability


Busan New Port Summary ll

High-tech New Terminal Competitive Distribution Center Bunker Station Ship Repair dry-dock

Distripark Development Project

3


Distripark Development

- Northern Distripark

Western Distripark

Southern Distripark

Total

Size (‘000㎡)

Whole 3,074 6,402 1,421 10,896

For Lease

1,704 3,579 1,421 6,704

Period 2001~2011 2006~2020 2006 ~ 2015

Budget (million US$)

470 864 409 1,743

Remark Completed, 30 tenants

in operation

28 tenants selected for Phase 1-1

& 1-2

Under Feasibility

Study


North Distripark

Number of Tenant

Investment Total

Size Cargo

Generation (2013)

Employment (2013)

30 USD 355.4M 1,704K ㎡ 908K TEU 1,959


Business Model

Overseas Busan Port Distripark

(FTZ)

Overseas


Functions of Distripark

Applicable Business Tax Incentive & Benefits

Assembling Packaging

Storage Labeling

◈ Lease Terms and Conditions

- Lease Period : Max 50 years

- Lease Fee : 29~44cents/ ㎡/month

◈ Direct Tax

- 100% exemption for first 3 years

- 50% exemption for next 2 years

◈ Indirect Tax

- 100% exemption

- Zero VAT

Busan North Port Redevelopment Project

4


Project Outline

HBCT

DPCT

BIT

KBCT

UTC

Pier 1

Pier 2

Central Pier

Pier 3

Pier 4

◈ Size : 1,511,450㎡ ◈ Total Budget : USD 8.5 billion ◈ Period : 2009~2019 (Infra + Superstructure)

Redevelopment Target Area


New International Passenger Terminal

Total Budget

Period Wharf Terminal Building

Est Yearly Passengers

234mUS$ 2011~2015 One 100,000 G/T-Cruiseship Five 20,000 G/T-Passengership Six 500-Speed Ship

5-story Building, 92,826㎡

2.8m

http://www.google.co.kr/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=OjYFjrT4t409zM&tbnid=6OpSyvQCOpN1sM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://news20.busan.com/controller/newsController.jsp?newsId=20131105000115&ei=uyIMU8KeJ4rRlAX024CgAg&bvm=bv.61725948,d.dGI&psig=AFQjCNFgP1mGp88I7tDxupKiJPz97uDdNw&ust=1393390642269604


Cruise Terminal


Busan North Port Redevelopment Area in 2020

BPA Busan Stn.

Intnl. Passenger TML

Busan Metropolitan City

Beautiful City Busan

Busan Metropolitan City

Beautiful City Busan

Thank you

#

Documents

Busan - supplychainindonesia.com · 4 CNTR Terminal Operators 8m TEU Capacity 20 berths New Port ... Laem Chabang Laem Chabang Laem Chabang Tanjung Priok Tanjung Priok ... Feasibility