Upload
hilary-thornton
View
223
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BudgetChapter 10 in Guthrie
Dr. Len Elovitz
Objectives TLWDTAT:
Articulate a standard budget cycle
Evaluate the merits of various budget models
Discuss the impact of the political process on the budget process
What’s a Budget
A plan for acquiring and spending financial resources
Revenue & Expenditures
Balance
Line Item Budget Groups appropriations under major headings
Utilizes a cart of accounts
Most school districts utilize Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
NJ accounting history Fund Accounting POB GAAP
What does a budget look like
Bloomfield Budget 2012-13
See other district budgets at http://www.state.nj.us/education/finance/fp/ufb/2012/01.html
Program Budget
BUDGET CODES
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
GAA vitz
GAAP
BUDGET CODES
FUND
XX
11
CURRENT EXPENSE
PROGRAM/PROJECT
XXX
190
REGULAR
BUDGET CODES FUNCTION
XXX
100
INSTRUCTION
OBJECT
XXX
610
SUPPLIES
BUDGET CODES Location
XX
41
MIDDLE SCHOOL
Program Area
XX
28
SOCIAL STUDIES
BUDGET CODES
MIDDLE SCHOOL SOCIAL STUDIES SUPPLIES
11.190.100.610.41.28
Fund.Program.Function.Object.Location.Program Area
Uniform Chart of Accounts
Budgeting Basic Concepts: Assumptions, Power, and Methods
Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009
Budgeting aligns resources with purposes Forges a link between planning and evaluation Shows more than how monies will be spent Involves political activity of give and take
Basic Budget Concepts
Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009
An instrument of control The budget translates into who has the power
and control It reflects the organization’s objectives and
goals
The Budget Cycle Planning for the needs of the district
Seeking Adequate Funding
Receiving and spending funds
Evaluating the process and results
Planning
The translation of educational needs into a financial plan
A management function that involves systemic determination of future resource allocation
Organizational Perspectives on planning, budgeting, and evaluation
Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009
There are three contrasting perspectives on the budgetary process Rational: assumes stakeholders work in a
logical fashion to improve student outcomes Bureaucratic: standard patterns of behaviors
based on the rules and regulations of a “top-down” hierarchy
Political: budgeting is a power play among actors seeking organizational rewards
Budget Planning Approaches
Rational Assumptions: development of an educational plan and budget that logically improves student outcomes
Planners have an appropriate knowledge and authority to develop a plan centered on student outcomes as a primary criterion
Planners operate with technical efficiency, which requires that those involved strive to produce a maximum level of outcomes with financial, organizational, and legal constraints
Bureaucratic Assumptions: planning focuses on sustaining or increasing previous year’s spending base
School or school district’s educational goals and objectives are secondary
Planners support existing organizational processes - status quo is maintained from one year to the next
Political Assumptions: budgeting is bargaining among self-interested individuals and groups
The development of the education plan and budget is a political activity. Student outcomes are seldom considered.
Conflict is seen as normalPower players develop goalsPlans are subjective without formal measures
19Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon
2009
Budget Planning Process First step is planning how to plan
Who will be involved What is the planning time frame
Planning may be centralized or decentralized, depending on leadership style, involvement of the BOE, relationships with the community and/or organizational history.
Budget and Power:Budget control is organizational control
Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009
Centralized Top down Superintendent and
key district personnel Schools given a
specific amount and must account for spending
All students treated the same in the budget
Decentralized Site-based budgeting Participatory
budgeting process Lump sum given to
schools according to site-developed plan
Attends to individual student
In actuality there exists a continuum from centralized to decentralized
Fundamental Budgeting Assumptions:annularity, comprehensiveness, balanceAnnularity Comprehensiveness Balance
An agreed upon span of time over which resource allocation and financial administration can occur
Process encompasses all revenues received by and monies spent by an organization regardless of source or purpose
Assumes explicit organizational knowledge of resources and obligations with the two matching
Remains constant Can keep track of a variety of funds and accounts in a variety of ways
Can borrow resources to construct long-lasting capacity
Usually set for a year, but not usually a calendar year
Tracks the input and output of resources to know where all monies are used
If what is spent exceeds what is received, the organization is out of control
Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009
Budgeting Methods
Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009
Each method provides structure for budget estimates and budget documents
Considerations for choosing a method Individual needs of the school or the district Legal restrictions Size of the district District financal condition School governance structure
Incremental Budgeting
Each budget line receives same increase or decrease
Gives little attention to how budget fits education plan
Incremental Budgeting at 4%
KEAN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SCHOOL: 41 - MIDDLE
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 INCREASE
CODE EXPENDED BUDGETED PROPOSED (DECREASE)
FUND 11
Contracted Services 420 $106,908.17 107,300 111,592 4,292
Lease/Purchases 440 $23,336.84 29,000 30,160 1,160
Communication/Postage 530 $4,271.60 4,700 4,888 188
Travel/Conferences 580 $3,600.00 4,000 4,160 160
Supplies 610 $85,178.40 74,427 77,404 2,977
Textbooks 640 $20,673.97 22,508 23,408 900
Miscellaneous Expenses 890 $6,787.09 13,726 14,275 549
Sub-Total Fund 11 $250,756.07 255,661 265,887 10,226
FUND 12
Equipment, Instructional 731 $14,009.14 18,412 19,148 736
Equipment, Non-instructional 732 $6,321.36 7,324 7,617 293
Sub-Total Fund 12 $20,330.50 25,736 26,765 1,029
TOTAL $271,086.57 281,397 292,653 11,256
Line-Item Budgeting
Line-item is the basis for expenditure
Uses workload and inflationary increases with last year’s numbers
KEAN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SCHOOL: 41 - MIDDLE
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 INCREASE
CODE EXPENDED BUDGETED PROPOSED (DECREASE)
FUND 11
Contracted Services 420 $106,908.17 107,300 108,373 1,073
Lease/Purchases 440 $23,336.84 29,000 29,000 0
Communication/Postage 530 $4,271.60 4,700 4,888 188
Travel/Conferences 580 $3,600.00 4,000 4,160 160
Supplies 610 $85,178.40 74,427 78,893 4,466
Textbooks 640 $20,673.97 22,508 23,858 1,350
Miscellaneous Expenses 890 $6,787.09 13,726 14,275 549
Sub-Total Fund 11 $250,756.07 255,661 263,447 7,786
FUND 12
Equipment, Instructional 731 $14,009.14 18,412 19,148 736
0
Equipment, Non-instructional 732 $6,321.36 7,324 7,617 293
0
Sub-Total Fund 12 $20,330.50 25,736 26,765 1,029
0
0
TOTAL $271,086.57 281,397 290,213 8,816
Line Item Budgeting at 4% + 2% for Increased Enrollment
Formula Funding
Major functions budgeted centrally
Budget formula used for schools includes enrollment
Principal is not the decision maker
KEAN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SCHOOL: 41 - MIDDLE
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 INCREASE
CODE EXPENDED BUDGETED PROPOSED (DECREASE)
FUND 11
Contracted Services 420 $106,908.17 107,300 108,373 1,073
Lease/Purchases 440 $23,336.84 29,000 29,000 0
Communication/Postage 530 $4,271.60 4,700 4,888 188
Travel/Conferences 580 $3,600.00 4,000 4,160 160
Supplies 610 $85,178.40 74,427 78,893 4,466
Textbooks 640 $20,673.97 22,508 23,858 1,350
Miscellaneous Expenses 890 $6,787.09 13,726 14,275 549
Sub-Total Fund 11 $250,756.07 255,661 263,447 7,786
FUND 12
Equipment, Instructional 731 $14,009.14 18,412 16,571 (1,841)
0
Equipment, Non-instructional 732 $6,321.36 7,324 6,592 (732)
0
Sub-Total Fund 12 $20,330.50 25,736 23,162 (2,574)
0
0
TOTAL $271,086.57 281,397 286,610 5,213
Formula Budgeting at 4% + 2% for Increased Enrollment - 10% for Equipment
Programming, Planning & Budgeting Systems
Builds a budget to execute the educational plan
Budget reflects estimated costs of meeting objectives
Alternatives investigated
Last year’s numbers are only a guide
Proposed Budget
Zero-based Budgeting
Builds a budget with little regard to the previous year
No guarantees that an item continues from one year to the next
Forces careful consideration of priorities and goals
ZBB Steps
Define decision units – school, dept., etc. Develop decision packages to include:
Goals to be achieved Alternative means of meeting the goal Levels of effort needed to reach each alternative Cost & benefits of each alternative The technical & operational feasibility of each
alternative The consequences of not funding each alternative
Rank decision packets Approve and fund decision packets
School Based Budgeting
Decentralized process that involves various school personnel and the local community
School makes choices on most things except capital projects
Principal is given varying degrees of power over budget allocations
The most important aspect is power over staffing Total Student Load and NYC
Budgeting Methods
Incremental Budgeting
Line-Item Budgeting
Formula Funding
Programming, Planning & Budgeting Systems
Zero-based Budgeting
School Based Budgeting
Most common approach previous year builds budget
Commonly used with more specificity than incremental
Used by large districtsPerceived as fair and efficient
Builds a budget to execute the educational plan
Builds a budget with little regard to the previous year
Decentralized process that involves various school personnel and the local community
Each budget line receives same increase or decrease
Line-item proper basis for expenditure
Major functions budgeted centrally
Resource allocation is more complex
No guarantees that an item continues from one year to the next
More consistent with current research on productivity
Gives little attention to how budget fits ed. plan
Uses workload and inflationary increases with last year’s numbers
Budget formula used for schools includes enrollment
Budget reflects estimated costs of objectives, alternatives investigated
Forces careful consideration of priorities and goals
School makes choices on most things except capital projects
Focus on inputs Little attention to how budget fits ed plan
Principal is not the decision maker in this model
Used by large systems with capacity to use this method
Method is time consuming and expensive
Increased popularity with new accountability
Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009
Schroeder-Elovitz Method of Budgeting-schools1. Determine approximate increase percentage that
might fly2. Complete enrollment projections for each building
and each course at HS & MS3. Develop Building budget base for each building by
increasing this year’s base per student by the projected number of students
4. Provide principals with their base amounts and projected enrollments
5. Provide principals with program budget sheets6. Principals submit completed budget requests and
decision packets for expenditures beyond the base
7. Principals and other purchase center heads meet with supt, sba, asst. sups. To defend their budget requests (may bring dept heads)
8. Items inside the BBB are reviewed and approved
9. Decision packets are presented and approved or rejected
10. Approved appropriations are folded into the district proposed budget
Pesonnel1. Cost of guides are determined by moving
each staff member up a step on the appropriate guide.
2. If in negotiations, reasonable expected settlement is included
3. Known retirees are deducted and replaced with step 3 on the guide
4. Additions and RIF’s that are are determined at individual defenses are factored in
5. SBA determines benefit costs6. Appropriations are folded into the budget
Salaries Guides
Increments
Retirees Level Changes Don’t forget benefits
Physical Plant Needs Principals and facilities director submit project
requests to SBA SBA and facilities director tour the buildings
with principals SBA and facilities director prioritize list SBA and facilities director present list and
other building operation requests at budget defense
Appropriations are folded into the budget
Other CO administrators and supervisor present and defend program sheets
1. Transportation2. Curriculum & Instruction3. Technology4. Special Education5. Approved appropriations are folded into the
budget
Preliminary budget1. Developed from totaling the program sheets
into appropriate lines2. Presented to the Board per their request3. Modifications are made per Board direction4. Proposed budget presented at public hearing5. Board may modify again and approves for
presentation to NJDOE.6. Election
Budget Calendar
July – Fiscal year begins – closeout previous year Begin to administer current budget
October Enrollment projections Staff needs projection Facility needs projections
November Current budget revision Central office input on needs and changes Maintenance & operations requests
Budget Calendar
January Principal and Purchase center requests
February Compile budget draft Prioritize and adjust to reach desired level
March Present Budget to the BOE Revise as necessary
April Get state approval Budget hearing - Adoption Local approval or Appeal
Budget Calendar
May – Establish tax rate
July – Start again
Superintendents Role Evaluate economic climate - talk to the board Estimate other revenues Come up with an idea of what might fly in terms of percentage Translate into building budget base Consider enrollment projections Provide principals and other purchase center heads with their base
and budget planning forms Personnel Principal defense Compile budget Make adjustments Present to Board Get Board approval “sell” the budget Election/Board of School Estimate Pass/Fail
Selling the Budget Linden 2011-12 budget presentation
Cutting the Budget Determine the amount to be cut
Develop Decision Packets
Prioritize
Prepare list of cuts
Budget Reduction Methods similar to Budget development
Incremental – all lines reduced by same percentage Line Item – lines are reduced by determined
amounts that add up to reduction Formula – budget reductions based on formula
usually driven by enrollment PPBS – Objectives and their funding are delayed or
eliminated ZBB – Decision packets are prioritized into proposed
cuts SBB – Principal is given the amount and he/she
determines what will be cut
Line Budget Reduction
Summary
Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009
Although often considered as a concrete activity, budgeting is an area of school finance that is heavily influenced by the values and philosophies with which one approaches the endeavor.