22
Liberty Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

LibertyLibertyDr. Len Elovitz

Chapter 15 in Guthrie

1

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Page 2: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

2

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Purpose of the ChapterPurpose of the Chapter

To understand how the manner in which educational choice might affect the lived reality of parents

Who has liberty to do what at whose expense?

Page 3: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

3

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

LibertyLiberty

Liberty is at the heart of the American experience. The associated freedom to choose includes personal choice in political, philosophical, and economic alternatives.

The “rub” arises when applied to schooling. The tension lies between benefiting the individual or society.

Is the student a creature of the family, the state, or the individual?

Page 4: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

4

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Cathy’s ChoiceCathy’s Choice

Refer to the case in your text pages 327 7 328 The idea of a common school system benefiting

all students is an American model. Yet, Americans are uncomfortable with uniformity as well as policy that directly affects their situation.

“Of course we should diversify my daughter’s school, but if we are adversely affected by rezoning, we will go private (or sue all the way to the Supreme Court!).”

Page 5: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

5

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Differing View of LibertyDiffering View of Liberty

The debate centers on the assumption that government is best when at its least and if asked to govern, does so closest to the people.– Negative liberty

Seeks to free an agent Much of education focuses breaking down barriers within

the system to make education possible for all impossible

– Positive liberty Seeks barriers necessary to protect choice of a greater

number of people– Speed limit is an example

Page 6: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

6

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Liberty Argument with Three Agents: Liberty Argument with Three Agents: state, local district, and individual state, local district, and individual familiesfamilies Public provision of education increases bureaucracy and

restricts choice Teacher assignment done by the bureaucracy without

parental input Parents not included in curricular or instructional

decisions. Attendance compulsory without regard to family need School year calendar imposes vacation times on the

family Students bound to the system through ages 16 or 18

irregardless of system’s capacity to deliver the core technology

Page 7: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

7

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

The Liberty Argument & The The Liberty Argument & The Administration of SchoolsAdministration of SchoolsSome feel the level above them cause the

negative liberty, hampering the ability of providing choice for students and their families

All levels use the argument in an attempt to implement personal or collective preferences contending that they will lead to an improved educational experience

Page 8: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

8

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

State Liberty and the Federal RoleState Liberty and the Federal Role

Article 10 of the Bill of Rights allocates the responsibility of education to states, implicitly

Until the 1954 Brown V. Board of Education Supreme Court case, the federal government stayed silent on matter of public education

Using the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, the federal government’s role in the governance of public education has grown

Page 9: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

9

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

District-Level and the State RoleDistrict-Level and the State Role

Ultimate responsibility for public education rests on the state

State educational agencies dictate a range of issues– Curriculum– Facilities– Financial management– Allocation of resources

Page 10: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

10

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Family-Level Liberty: School Family-Level Liberty: School ChoiceChoiceHousehold is the closest available unit of

governanceMost invested in student outcomesGreatest empowerment of educational

choices for students

Page 11: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

11

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

SubsidiaritySubsidiarity

This is the idea that the lowest decision unit that is closest to the client: individual, family, school, district, county, state, or nation that has the primary decision authority

The family is a unit of governance Decisions should be made at this level unless

there is a compelling reason– National defense

There is a tension between family wants and educators’ knowledge and skill sets as to deciding what is best for the student

Page 12: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

12

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Incremental Means for Enhancing Incremental Means for Enhancing School ChoiceSchool ChoiceMagnet Schools

– 1970’s schools of specialization– Open enrollment or lottery systems– Receive additional funding– Appeals to parents– No transportation provided– At times, used to racially integrate systems

Page 13: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

13

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Incremental Means for Enhancing Incremental Means for Enhancing School Choice School Choice (cont’d)(cont’d) Intradistrict Choice

– Market within a district

– Parents free to choose any public school within zone or district

– Desegregation method under unitary status

– Tradeoffs Resegregation Benefits dependent on demographic of the district Increased transportation costs Decreases efficiency of the school district and their budgets

Page 14: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

14

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Enhancing School ChoiceEnhancing School Choice

Charter Schools– Charter laws vary from state to state determining

liberty of school governance, resources, instruction, and operation

– While the model varies greatly, several common elements have emerged:

A governance structure independent of the district Reduced or eliminated state regulations Direct parental control A mandate to succeed with sanctions for failure

Page 15: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

15

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Charter SchoolsCharter Schools

A national survey of charter school parents revealed in the following characteristics were important drivers in choice of a charter– Small school and class size– Safe environment– Quality academic programs– High standards– Specialized curricular focus

Page 16: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

16

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Charter SchoolsCharter Schools

The impact of the charter school model on student achievement is mixed. Some of the charters have been revoked by their state. Many non-renewals are blamed on lack of business savvy versus concerns over curriculum or instruction.

Charter research still lacks a depth needed for real evaluation of the program, but some innovation taken place in the charters is finding its way to the traditional public schools.

Page 17: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

17

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Enhancing School ChoiceEnhancing School Choice

Vouchers– Milton Friedman’s concept of liberty and public

education– Family is an economic unit subject to free markets for

goods and services– Education funds travel with the student– Model of horizontal equity– Household has ultimate control over schooling– Supreme Court ruled vouchers constitutional in

Zelman v. Simmons-Harris

Page 18: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

18

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

VouchersVouchers

Challenges– Communitarian concerns– Ethnic and socioeconomic balkanization– Elites will out price certain students– Private concerns - tensions profit v.

educational interests– Violation of church and state - Zelman v.

Simmons-Harris

Page 19: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

19

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Enhancing School ChoiceEnhancing School Choice

Tuition Tax Credits– Enfranchises households as decision maker– Less governmental regulation– Parents get a tax credit for attendance at

nonpublic schools– Tax credits can be graduated in terms of

schooling level or by taxpayer income bracket– Effect seems less attractive than state

provision of transportation

Page 20: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

20

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Enhancing School ChoiceEnhancing School Choice

Other Market Mechanisms– Added efficiency from use of market

mechanisms– Contract providers for cafeteria services– Decentralize budget for staff development and

curriculum assistance to school sites– Increase accountability and control at school

sites

Page 21: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

21

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Liberty as Aspiration and Policy:Liberty as Aspiration and Policy:NCLB and the Future of School ChoiceNCLB and the Future of School Choice Historically, liberty has been seen as an outcome,

now paradigm shift to view it as an input in the schooling process

NCLB gives “teeth” to Florida’s use of vouchers making this the first time a viable choice option has been tied to a greater education policy on a national scale

Implications– Replaces bureaucratic “government schools”– May harm political will to fund community schools– Choice options brought into sharpen and supplement

failing public education schools

Page 22: Liberty Dr. Len Elovitz Chapter 15 in Guthrie 1 Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

22

Peabody College Series. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

SummarySummary Choice replicates the policy improvements of the

past in its untried and dangerous setting The introduction of choice has prompted a

groundswell of empirical research all aimed at finding out what makes an effective school….effective

Educators, policymakers, and parents are learning of the costs and benefits associated with a move toward greater liberty in public schools

The issue of choice provides substantial material for debate in conversations surrounding the future of the American education system