BG SUBSTITUTES

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    1/29

    Bone Graft and its substitutes

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    2/29

    Introduction

    Need for bone grafting: To replace skeletal defects

    To augment bony recontruction

    Bridge joints in arthrodesis

    To provide bone blocks to limit joint motion [arthroereisis]

    Establish union in pseudoarthrosis

    To promote union : in fresh #s, delayed unions, non

    unions and osteotomies.

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    3/29

    Bone Graft Terminology

    Based on anatomic placement: Orthotopic: Transplantation to similar anatomic site

    Heterotopic: Grafting to anatomically dissimilar site

    Based on tissue architecture: Cortical, cancellous,corticocancellous, Osteochondral

    Based on source: Autograft: same individual,different sitea] non vascularised b]

    vascularised

    Allograft: same species but genetically different individual

    Xenograft: different species

    Isograft: monozygotic twin

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    4/29

    Bone Graft Function

    Osteogenesis

    Mechanical support

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    5/29

    Biology of Bone Grafts

    Bone regeneration: Osteoinduction

    Osteoconduction

    Osteoprogenetor cells

    Osteoinduction: stimulation of host bed to synthesise new bone.-Graft derived Low molecular wgt protiens stimulate mesenchymal stem cellsto differentiate into bone forming cells.

    This induction of stem cells does not require viable graft cells because it is aproperty of bone matrix.

    Osteoconduction:The Matrix/ scaffolding that permits cellinfiltration and ingrowth of new host bone, this process is reffered asosteoconduction. A three dimentional configuration for ingrowth into graft ofhost capillaries, perivascular tissues, and osteoproginator cells from therecepient. [creeping sunstitution]

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    6/29

    Incorporation of the graft

    Haematoma formation Inflamatory response releaseof cytokines and growth factors.

    Osteoinduction drives chemotaxis, mitosis, anddifferentiation of osteoproginetor cells

    Day5

    chondrocyts form

    Day 10- osteoblasts

    Host blood vessels infiltrate through harvesian andvolkmanns canals and bring with them osteoclasts forresorption.

    Remodelling occurs along the lines of biomechanicalforces.

    Hence succesful incorporation needs: good bloodsupply, osteogenesis, grafts response to load applied.

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    7/29

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    8/29

    Cancellous autografts

    Larger surface area

    Faster incorporation [ 4 weeks- healing 6 months complete remodelling]

    Good osteoinductive, osteoconductive

    and osteogenetic properties.

    No ability to confer structural strength

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    9/29

    Cortical Autografts

    Due to density- revascularisation andremodelling are slower

    Unlike cancellous grafts these are

    incorporated by appositional bone growthover a necrotic area.

    Good structural support

    Minimal osteogenetic, moderateosteoinductive and conductive properties

    Types: Vascularised , non vascularised.

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    10/29

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    11/29

    Disadvantages of autografts

    A separate donor site is required

    Increased surgical time

    Another potential site for infection created

    Additional amount of blood loss Weaknening of normal structure

    Local complications

    Limited availability

    relative paucity of osteogenic cells in the graft inolder individuals

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    12/29

    Vascularised auto graft

    Incorporates independent of host bed andfunctions even in biologically defecient hostenvironment

    Advantages: Compromised vascularity in the host bed causing poor osteogenic

    cells, poor surrounding tissues

    If infection at surgical site

    poor soft tissue coverage

    Systemic chemotherapy

    Disadvantages: Time consuming

    Technically very demanding

    Limited donor sites [ proximal fibula, ribs]

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    13/29

    Allografts

    Graft taken from two genetically different

    individuals of the same species.

    Mode of availability: Frozen

    Freeze dried [morcellised]

    Cancellous allografts: mainly to fill the

    cavitory defects Cortical allografts: for structural support

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    14/29

    How are they Preserved

    Freezing

    Freeze drying

    [ helps in better incorporation as it reducesimmunogenecity]

    Decalcification and demineralisation

    [ these grafts have not much mechanicalstrength]

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    15/29

    Sterilisation techniques

    Irradiation : destroys osteoinductive

    property

    Chemosterilisation

    Autolysed

    Antigen extraction

    [ last three has good osteoinduction but poormechanical strength]

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    16/29

    Advantages

    Abundantly available in amount, shapesand sizes

    No donor site morbidity

    Good mechanical strength

    Good Osteoconductive property

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    17/29

    Disadvantages

    Immunogenic

    Higher failure rate notes

    Graft incorporation very much delayed

    [ more than 2 yrs]

    Risk of disease transmission

    Low osteoinductive property If these grafts fracture unlikely to heal

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    18/29

    Bone Banking

    Tissues recovered under sterile conditions fromyoung donors with strong bone after carefulscreening for neoplasm and infection

    If cartilage present graft is first treated by

    dimethylsulfoxide and later freezed to preservethe viability of chondrocytes

    The muscular, teninous, and ligamentousattachments are preserved

    After biplanar radiographs taken, specimens arecultured, rapidly frozen, and maintained at -80*cuntil they are used

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    19/29

    Factors for success of a bone

    grafting Clean, well vascularised host bed is critical

    Wide excision of scar tissue

    Treatment of infection

    Protection of blood supply Satisfactory soft tissue coverage

    Appropriate selection of graft material as per thedesired clinical function

    Firmly/ tight apposition of graft bone and hostbone

    Stable fixation of the graft

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    20/29

    Bone Substitutes

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    21/29

    Types

    Naturally Derived Substitutes: Demineralised Bone Matrix [DBM]

    Bone Marrow and Bone Marrow Products

    Synthetically derived substitutes Calcium sulphates

    Tricalcium Phosphates

    Calcium phosphate cements

    Corralline based hydroxyapatites

    Bone Morphogenetic Proteins

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    22/29

    Synthetically derived substitutes

    Less chances of viral transmission

    compared to natural derived substitutes

    Less variability

    They are tested rigorously for safety and

    efficacy

    It mainly provides a scaffold forosteoproginetor cells to proliferate and

    differentiate.

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    23/29

    Calcium sulphates [POP]

    First used in in 1892 complete healing of nine

    cavitory lesions

    Has no weight bearing ability

    Resorbs very quickly [6 weeks] [i.e: dissappearsfrom implantation site whether bone formation

    has taken place or not]

    A promising carrier for antibiotics,DBMs,BMPs,or any other molecules being

    delivered to defect site.

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    24/29

    Tricalcium Phosphates

    TCPs Less crystalline

    Two types: Alpha and beta

    Alpha soluble and resorbs fast

    Beta less soluble and resorbs by

    osteoclastic activity only : hence it will

    disappear only after new bone formation

    Has only osteoconductive property

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    25/29

    Calcium Phosphate Cements

    No weight bearing capability

    Powder and solvent is mixed and the resultantceremic paste injected/ moulded into non weight

    bearing defect. Setting time 10 to 30 minutes depending on

    formulations

    After curing they form a apatitic compound

    similar to bone mineral These cements do not degrade during a patients

    lifetime.

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    26/29

    Coral based hydroxyapatite

    Calcium carbonate exoskeleton of reef buildingmarine corals processed to form calciumphosphates.

    Corals of scleractinian genus used

    Goniopora species- first used- its pores aresimilar to cancellous bone pores- 500 to600microm

    Porites species similar to cortical bone pore

    diameter- 200microm. Useful to fill defects after tumour excision with

    wide defects.

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    27/29

    Collagen Based technology

    Type 1 collagen extracted from animal

    source, mostly from bovine source

    Good osteoconductive property

    Disadv:

    Hypersensitivity to bovine collagen

    Uses: Mainly as a carrier along with other

    materials.

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    28/29

    Naturally Derived

    Available clinically from 1990s.

    Disadv:

    High tissue variability

    Viral transmission

  • 7/30/2019 BG SUBSTITUTES

    29/29