Upload
fern
View
40
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
BEYOND GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION (EXPERIMENTAL). W. KITTEL Radboud University Nijmegen. Some History A.Wr óblewski (ISMD’77): BEC does not depend on energy BEC does not depend on type of particle (except AB) However: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
BEYOND GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION (EXPERIMENTAL)
W. KITTELRadboud University Nijmegen
Some History
A.Wróblewski (ISMD’77):BEC does not depend on energyBEC does not depend on type of particle (except AB)However:BEC does depend on statistics of experiment! (R increases with increasing Nev)
G.Thomas (PRD77), P.Grassberger (NP77): ρ-decay will make it steeper
J.Masarik, A.Nogová, J.Pišút, N.Pišútova (ZP97): more resonances even power-like
Some More History
B.Andersson + W.Hofmann (PLB’86): string makes it steeper than Gaussian (approximately exponential)
A. Białas (NPA’92, APPB’92): power law if size of source fluctuates from event to event and/or the source itself is a self-similar (fractal-type) object (see also previous talk)
UA1 (1994)NA22 (1993)
Power law, indeed!
Higher Orders
NA22 (ZPC’93):multi-Gaussian fits according to M.Biyajima et al. (’90, ’92)
as a function of Q2 : “reasonable” fitsAs a function of –lnQ2 : steeper than Gaussian
UA1 (ZPC’93, Eggers, Lipa, Buschbeck PRL’97)compared to Andreev, Plümer, Weiner (1993)
Gaussian clearly excluded => power law
Edgeworth and Laguerre Expansion
Csörgő + Hegyi (PLB 2000):
Edgeworth:
R2(Q) = γ ( 1 + λ*exp(-Q2r2) [ 1 + κ3H3(2½Qr)/3! + · · · ]
with κ3= third-order cumulant moment H3= third-order Hermite polynomial
Laguerre:
Replace Gaussian by exponential and Hermite by Laguerre
fits by Csörgő and Hegyi: dashed = Gauss full = Edgeworth
fits again by Csörgő and Hegyi: dashed = exponential full = Laguerre
but: low-Q points still systematically above and power law equally good (with fewer parameters)
Higher Dimensionality
L3 (PLB 1999):
Bertsch-Pratt parametrization (QL, Qside, Qout)
Gaussian : CL = 3%Edgeworth : = 30%
Lévy-stable Distributions
Csörgő, Hegyi , Zajc (EPJC 2004):(see also Brax and Peschanski 91)Lévy-stable distributions describe functions with non-finitevariance which behave as
f(r) = |r| -1- for |r| ∞ ( 0 µ 2)
Particularly useful feature: “characteristic function” (i.e. the Fourier transform) of a symmetric stable distribution is
F(Q) = exp(iQδ - |γQ|μ)
R2(Q) = 1 + exp(-|rQ|μ) with r = 21/μγ
(see following talks )
Conclude
Correlation functions at small Q in general steeper thanGaussian
Edgeworth (and Laguerre) better, but what is the physics?
Power law not excluded
Lévy-stable functions allow to interpolate. Are they asolution?
Questions
• Elongation ( rside/rL < 1) Qinv versus directional dependence
• rout rside
Boost invariance
• mT dependence (also in e+e-) factor 0.5 from mπ to 1GeV. Space-momentum correlation
• non-Gaussian behavior Edgeworth, power law, Lévy-stability Connection to intermittency
• 3-particle correlations Phase versus higher-order suppression Strength parameter λ
• Source image reconstruction
• Overlapping systems (WW, 3-jet, nuclei) HBT versus string
• Dependence on type of collision (no, except for heavy nuclei) • Energy (virtuality) dependence (no, except for rL)
• Multiplicity Dependence r increases λ decreases
• effect on multiplicity and single-particle distribution